R
rbowman
Guest
On 04/18/2022 05:44 AM, Commander Kinsey wrote:
That\'s not a general problem. There was a period with the early Athlons
that didn\'t implement some of the new Intel instructions but I\'ve leaned
towards AMD with no problem.
It wasn\'t AMD but I recall one processor that ran CP/M and DOS, both
rather poorly. National maybe?
On Sun, 17 Apr 2022 01:38:34 +0100, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
On 04/16/2022 05:20 PM, Jasen Betts wrote:
On 2022-04-16, Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:
On Sat, 16 Apr 2022 13:31:06 +0100, RJH <patchmoney@gmx.com> wrote:
On 16 Apr 2022 at 11:52:08 BST, \"The Natural Philosopher\"
tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 16/04/2022 11:35, RJH wrote:
On 16 Apr 2022 at 11:06:34 BST, \"The Natural Philosopher\"
tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 15/04/2022 21:28, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
On 2022-04-15, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid
wrote:
BEVs are very mature technology. There is only a bit left to
improve.
Like aircraft and cars in general.
Yeah, they keep saying that about computers, too. And they\'re
constantly proved wrong.
They are completely right about computers. They cant be clocked any
faster, they cant be made to work with much less power - all
they can do
is add more cores.
The new(ish) Apple processors use a fraction (between and half
and a third) of
the power used by an Intel equivalent.
That by itself, says nothing
A Z80 uses way less power than a pentium
A motorcycle uses way less power than a ferrari.
It says everything. Less power for the same load - google Apple M1
I prefer things designed for adults.
I very much doubt Apple can beat Intel anyway.
It\'s not Apple vs Intel it\'s TSMC vs Intel.
True, but possibly not the way you meant it. AMD is partnered with TSMC
and the Zen 3+ design on TSMC 6nm capabilities is currently kicking
Intel ass.
There is a problem with AMD. Their implementation of VT-D
(virtualization to use two OSes on one CPU) sux. It slows the system
right down and it\'s hard to interact with it.
That\'s not a general problem. There was a period with the early Athlons
that didn\'t implement some of the new Intel instructions but I\'ve leaned
towards AMD with no problem.
It wasn\'t AMD but I recall one processor that ran CP/M and DOS, both
rather poorly. National maybe?