Where can I buy a large analogue meter?...

On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 03:21:52 +0100, whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com> wrote:

On Sunday, April 17, 2022 at 7:52:51 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Monday, April 18, 2022 at 10:20:33 AM UTC+10, whit3rd wrote:
On Sunday, April 17, 2022 at 3:36:35 PM UTC-7, Commander Kinsey wrote:

Nobody does anything critical with a Mac anyway. They\'re just for arty folk.

Not an uncommon view, but inaccurate. Excel, for example, started life
as macintosh-only code; the Windows version was an afterthought, ported
over.
Isn\'t Excel just a Windows steal of Viscalc? Lotus 1-2-3 came next, so Excel is more a Chinese copy of that that exploited the Widows graphical user interface - and of course the MacIntosh had the first commercial graphical user interface, copied from the Xerox PARC Alto machines (of which there were a couple of thousand, although it was never marketed).

Visicalc was the killer application for the original Apple 2 computer. Dan Flystra made a lot of money out of it - I had an acquaintance at MIT at the time, who had run into Flystra who was also active in starting up Byte (which was how I got to be foundation subscriber to the magazine).

The Visicalc clone by Microsoft was MultiPlan; it was Mac users of Excel that convinced \'em to start over
as they Windows-ed up their application, and Excel 2 for Windows was their first Intel-processor release.
Apple\'s big win came with LaserWriters that could do the WYSIWYG thing, along with inexpensive
local networking.

I\'m guessing you never tried to use appletalk.
 
On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 03:51:35 +0100, whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com> wrote:

On Monday, April 18, 2022 at 1:28:51 PM UTC-7, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 18:45:36 +0100, Ricky <gnuarm.del...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Monday, April 18, 2022 at 12:27:14 PM UTC-4, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 17:02:18 +0100, charles <cha...@candehope.me.uk> wrote:

Wirewrap used to be the standard for GPO wiring blocks.
Which is why they went wrong so often. Yeah lets just hope two things touching with no solder or pressure just happen to conduct. It\'s the way kids make stuff. Twist the wires together and hope for the best.

It is one thing to be ignorant. It is another to publicly declare your ignorance for all to see.

It doesn\'t take much effort at all for you to do a little research and find that wirewrap is actually a highly reliable technique if done according to the guidelines.
Touching things cannot be as good as welded together things.

Wrong. Crimping and welding are both entirely acceptable for high reliability,
with solder just a little behind. Wire-wrap is a variable entity, because there\'s lots of
wire and lots of posts, and some combinations are just dandy, like crimping.

You have to hope those two pieces of metal are always in contact. I don\'t with solder, because they are \"the same\" piece of metal.

Plus if you get a bit of corrosion, you get a voltage drop. You even get that in high current plugs - a 13A mains plug or a 30A GPU power plug.

A PC power supply is always two or more circuit boards, because the required
components aren\'t reliably joined under ONE solder temperature profile, you gotta
use two or more different soldering methods to mass produce \'em. Solder,
when it works, is cheap, not excessively reliable.

Just had a look inside one, just one circuit board. Only the odd large component isn\'t on the board and is soldered on by wires.
 
On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 07:27:39 +0100, Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote:

On a sunny day (Mon, 18 Apr 2022 21:22:26 +0100) it happened \"Commander
Kinsey\" <CK1@nospam.com> wrote in <op.1kt77op7mvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:

On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 17:59:54 +0100, Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote:

On a sunny day (Mon, 18 Apr 2022 15:58:45 +0100) it happened \"Commander
Kinsey\" <CK1@nospam.com> wrote in <op.1kts77xamvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:

Mine appear to be limited by the CPU speed, one core is all the program will allocate per camera, so I only get 15 fps max.
Usually 7 fps as the computer is very busy running Boinc.

yes I keep several weeks.
Been playing with the Pimoroni IR camera module on Raspberry, low resolution but detects body heat.
That has now passed the \'several weeks 24/7 on\' test.
http://panteltje.com/panteltje/newsflex/download.html#xflir

I got some cheap shit from China. It\'s never the resolution advertised, but that means they\'ll panic and give you 50% off
the
already low price.

4 security cams go into one of those 4 channel security recorders from China
Works very well, it does not record anything, I take the output via the LAN and re-encode it with ffmpeg,

How complicated, mine are just USB cams, plug straight into the PC and it records.

Well, these are Sony \'starlight\' SUPERHAD 0.01 lux PAL/NTSC cameras, need no IR LEDs, can see in the near dark,
I use those for many things (shooting down F35s comes to mind).

Yeah the low lux would be nice. I tried IR but couldn\'t find a bright enough IR light. Considering just a PIR powered white light.

But I\'m guessing you paid a lot for a Sony camera.

> USB cams over twenty meters or more cable?

I could do 100m if I wanted, what makes you think this is a problem?

The intersting things is that one Raspberry Pi 4 with 4 GB memory records
those 4 cams, plus 2 other IP cameras plus 2 audio tracks and the
procesor load is still very low,
plays background mp3 music without hickups at the same time!
and I can browse the web with chromium at the same time.
Raspi is a quad core.

Tasks: 207 total, 1 running, 206 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
%Cpu(s): 6.7 us, 4.2 sy, 2.7 ni, 85.9 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.5 si, 0.0 st
MiB Mem : 3906.0 total, 2494.6 free, 443.2 used, 968.3 buff/cache
MiB Swap: 100.0 total, 100.0 free, 0.0 used. 3268.2 avail Mem

PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
32764 root 25 5 33144 12040 2412 S 8.2 0.3 35:19.57 xgpspc_mon
513 root 20 0 222132 40308 24808 S 7.6 1.0 34:25.54 ffmpeg
25093 root 20 0 222140 40160 24668 S 5.9 1.0 42:42.68 ffmpeg
512 root 20 0 16300 11504 3640 S 5.6 0.3 31:34.56 mcamip
25092 root 20 0 16300 11316 3468 S 5.6 0.3 40:53.77 mcamip2
32765 root 25 5 222044 40496 24724 S 3.6 1.0 15:52.81 ffmpeg
25786 root 20 0 148216 30692 23816 S 2.3 0.8 0:43.54 ffmpeg
25783 root 20 0 148348 31372 24184 S 1.6 0.8 0:42.82 ffmpeg
25784 root 20 0 147904 30724 23832 S 1.6 0.8 0:43.37 ffmpeg
25785 root 20 0 147912 31064 24172 S 1.6 0.8 0:42.52 ffmpeg
12871 root 20 0 4820 3316 2872 S 1.3 0.1 4:24.67 mpg123
25090 root 20 0 9764 3800 3396 S 1.3 0.1 7:01.93 wget2
25091 root 20 0 179936 29736 23628 S 1.3 0.7 6:35.35 ffmpeg

raspi95: /mnt/sda2/security/video # temperature
temp=48.0\'C

This raspi has alu housing and a fan
result:

In crontab new instances are started at different times with new serial number.
rw-r--r-- 1 root root 577241088 Apr 18 18:49 bp1.ts
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 853278720 Apr 18 18:49 camera6-1809.mp2
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1194590208 Apr 18 18:49 mcam-2.ts
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 954728448 Apr 18 18:49 camera6-1809.ts
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 574967920 Apr 18 18:49 hcam_4_2822.ts
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 575615956 Apr 18 18:49 hcam_3_154.ts
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 574837824 Apr 18 18:49 hcam_1_2989.ts
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 576117352 Apr 18 18:49 hcam_2_3011.ts

Uh ok. I\'m a human not a geek, you\'ve just posted greek. I use a GUI.

I have 9 virtual desktops, 1 has some icons you can click on, one has a browser, one has a Usenet newsreader, one has an audio mixer,
and 8 actually have a terminal.

Can\'t you afford real ones? I just have 5 monitors. I can see them all at once.

> GUI is for dummies, like going to a supermarket and searching on the shelves for what you need from what is plonked down there.

It\'s the way the human mind works, at least normal ones. If I showed you 50 pictures and asked you to find the widget, you could do it far faster than finding the word widget in a pile of 50 words.

> My computah speaks English and I can just type commands.

It isn\'t English.

> Much simpler and faster than mousing around in menus (if what you want is there at all).

Menus make it easy to find things. For common stuff keyboard shortcuts are always available.

> Of course you need to know Unix...

No need to learn that shit.

It is like going to a hardware store and asking \'I need this\' and the guy will get it for you.
But of course you need to know about what you want,

If I want a 7mm widget, maybe they have a 7.2mm one which would be better. Maybe the guy is busy, maybe he doesn\'t know exactly what I need. Very easy to walk down the aisle that contains widgets and pick the one I need. The largest part of the human brain is devoted to sight.

Maybe in the US these days reading and writing is on the way out (if it ever was in there ;-) )
and people will carry a book with pictures and take it and point to one to commie-nukate or whatever it was .
Its a SLOW way, but was already used in the [flint]stone age as drawings on rocks have shown.

Some people read comics (like poopeye), some read datasheets, some read code, and some just read what their computah says.

You are abnormal.
 
On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 07:11:53 +0100, Ricky <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote:

On Tuesday, April 19, 2022 at 1:51:35 AM UTC-4, erichp...@hotmail.com wrote:
On 18/04/2022 21:28, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 18:45:36 +0100, Ricky
gnuarm.del...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Monday, April 18, 2022 at 12:27:14 PM UTC-4, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 17:02:18 +0100, charles <cha...@candehope.me.uk
wrote:

In article <op.1kts3...@ryzen.lan>,
Commander Kinsey <C...@nospam.com> wrote:
On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 08:02:11 +0100, Jan Panteltje
pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote:

On a sunny day (Sun, 17 Apr 2022 14:08:22 -0600) it happened
rbowman
bow...@montana.com> wrote in <jc3adk...@mid.individual.net>:

On 04/17/2022 10:51 AM, Jan Panteltje wrote:
What\'s a modern programmer? One that uses that snake language
\'python\' or so?
I like to code in asm for Microchip PIC micros, there is a lot
you can do with 256 bytes RAM and 16 kB ROM.
http://panteltje.com/panteltje/pic/scope_pic/
http://panteltje.com/panteltje/pic/index.html

While I prefer the AVR series I definitely agree. My day job is
C/C++/C#
and increasingly JavaScript with a new Angular product but when
I get
home I like to keep in simple like when I could wire-wrap up a
working
Z80 board.

Have dot doen wirewrap in ages...
http://panteltje.com/panteltje/raspberry_pi_dvb-s_transmitter/

soldering....
:)

Isn\'t wirewrap what amateurs do that can\'t solder?

Wirewrap used to be the standard for GPO wiring blocks.
Which is why they went wrong so often. Yeah lets just hope two things
touching with no solder or pressure just happen to conduct. It\'s the
way kids make stuff. Twist the wires together and hope for the best.

It is one thing to be ignorant. It is another to publicly declare
your ignorance for all to see.

It doesn\'t take much effort at all for you to do a little research and
find that wirewrap is actually a highly reliable technique if done
according to the guidelines.

Touching things cannot be as good as welded together things.
Except wire wrap isn\'t just touching. The posts are square and the wire
wrapped under tension so the post corners bite deeply into the wire and
the torque built up in the post maintains constant high pressure gas
tight cold weld contacts. Dozens of them all in parallel. Wire wrapping
can be more reliable than soldering over temperature cycling. Voyager
and Apollo used a lot of wire wrap. And it is very quick - I used to
wire wrap prototypes faster than I could solder and needs no defluxing
after.

Are you saying NASA flew wire wrap in space missions?

Only because soldering hadn\'t been invented. Look in your stereo, now look in one from 40 years ago. They wouldn\'t change if it wasn\'t better.
 
On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 06:51:25 +0100, piglet <erichpwagner@hotmail.com> wrote:

On 18/04/2022 21:28, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 18:45:36 +0100, Ricky
gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote:

On Monday, April 18, 2022 at 12:27:14 PM UTC-4, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 17:02:18 +0100, charles <cha...@candehope.me.uk
wrote:

In article <op.1kts3...@ryzen.lan>,
Commander Kinsey <C...@nospam.com> wrote:
On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 08:02:11 +0100, Jan Panteltje
pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote:

On a sunny day (Sun, 17 Apr 2022 14:08:22 -0600) it happened
rbowman
bow...@montana.com> wrote in <jc3adk...@mid.individual.net>:

On 04/17/2022 10:51 AM, Jan Panteltje wrote:
What\'s a modern programmer? One that uses that snake language
\'python\' or so?
I like to code in asm for Microchip PIC micros, there is a lot
you can do with 256 bytes RAM and 16 kB ROM.
http://panteltje.com/panteltje/pic/scope_pic/
http://panteltje.com/panteltje/pic/index.html

While I prefer the AVR series I definitely agree. My day job is
C/C++/C#
and increasingly JavaScript with a new Angular product but when
I get
home I like to keep in simple like when I could wire-wrap up a
working
Z80 board.

Have dot doen wirewrap in ages...
http://panteltje.com/panteltje/raspberry_pi_dvb-s_transmitter/

soldering....
:)

Isn\'t wirewrap what amateurs do that can\'t solder?

Wirewrap used to be the standard for GPO wiring blocks.
Which is why they went wrong so often. Yeah lets just hope two things
touching with no solder or pressure just happen to conduct. It\'s the
way kids make stuff. Twist the wires together and hope for the best.

It is one thing to be ignorant. It is another to publicly declare
your ignorance for all to see.

It doesn\'t take much effort at all for you to do a little research and
find that wirewrap is actually a highly reliable technique if done
according to the guidelines.

And very time consuming.

Touching things cannot be as good as welded together things.

Except wire wrap isn\'t just touching. The posts are square and the wire
wrapped under tension so the post corners bite deeply into the wire and
the torque built up in the post maintains constant high pressure gas
tight cold weld contacts. Dozens of them all in parallel. Wire wrapping
can be more reliable than soldering over temperature cycling. Voyager
and Apollo used a lot of wire wrap. And it is very quick - I used to
wire wrap prototypes faster than I could solder and needs no defluxing
after.

And you just hope they don\'t waggle loose or change size a bit under temperature and lose that tension.
 
On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 12:16:12 +0100, Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> wrote:

On 18/04/2022 17:51, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 17:40:01 +0100, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:

I\'ve still got the tools and an assortment of wirewrap sockets but
haven\'t done a project in a long time. I got away from hardware when
surface mount came in. Even with magnifiers I don\'t have the vision to
deal with that anymore.

I astonished someone at work when he was trying to read a surface mount
resistor value through a magnifying glass. I glanced at it without one
and told him the value. Apparently I have the eyesight and the hearing
of a 16 year old. Unfortunately not the body.

Perhaps you are short sighted and took your glasses off.

No, I don\'t need any glasses. Why would I need to be short sighted to focus on something close? What\'s the closest you can focus? I can focus an inch from the end of my nose. Not that I needed to move that close, you must have really low resolution retinas.

(Wasn\'t there a disc jockey who got into \"trouble\" for saying, \"I feel
like a 16-year-old boy... but where can I get one at this time?\" (That
would be legal now. I hope Gordon Brown apologised.))

It\'s not legal in the USA in half the states. Did it used to be illegal here?
 
On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 07:30:23 +0100, Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote:

On a sunny day (Mon, 18 Apr 2022 21:27:22 +0100) it happened \"Commander
Kinsey\" <CK1@nospam.com> wrote in <op.1kt8fwismvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:

Surely reading glasses are not the same as magnifying glasses?

Same thing if positive.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lens

Surely reading glasses don\'t just magnify, they change the focusing distance. Someone who needs reading glasses is usually long sighted, so it needs to look to their eye as though the book etc is several feet away. Not necessary with a magnifying glass.
 
On a sunny day (Tue, 19 Apr 2022 17:56:08 +0100) it happened \"Commander
Kinsey\" <CK1@nospam.com> wrote in <op.1kvtbupfmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:

On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 07:27:39 +0100, Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote:

On a sunny day (Mon, 18 Apr 2022 21:22:26 +0100) it happened \"Commander
Kinsey\" <CK1@nospam.com> wrote in <op.1kt77op7mvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:

On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 17:59:54 +0100, Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote:

On a sunny day (Mon, 18 Apr 2022 15:58:45 +0100) it happened \"Commander
Kinsey\" <CK1@nospam.com> wrote in <op.1kts77xamvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:

Mine appear to be limited by the CPU speed, one core is all the program will allocate per camera, so I only get 15 fps
max.
Usually 7 fps as the computer is very busy running Boinc.

yes I keep several weeks.
Been playing with the Pimoroni IR camera module on Raspberry, low resolution but detects body heat.
That has now passed the \'several weeks 24/7 on\' test.
http://panteltje.com/panteltje/newsflex/download.html#xflir

I got some cheap shit from China. It\'s never the resolution advertised, but that means they\'ll panic and give you 50% off
the
already low price.

4 security cams go into one of those 4 channel security recorders from China
Works very well, it does not record anything, I take the output via the LAN and re-encode it with ffmpeg,

How complicated, mine are just USB cams, plug straight into the PC and it records.

Well, these are Sony \'starlight\' SUPERHAD 0.01 lux PAL/NTSC cameras, need no IR LEDs, can see in the near dark,
I use those for many things (shooting down F35s comes to mind).

Yeah the low lux would be nice. I tried IR but couldn\'t find a bright enough IR light. Considering just a PIR powered white
light.

But I\'m guessing you paid a lot for a Sony camera.

Well, what\'s a lot?
about 35 USD


USB cams over twenty meters or more cable?

I could do 100m if I wanted, what makes you think this is a problem?

Lots of loss in voltage over USB cables.
google: \'USB maximum cable length\'


Uh ok. I\'m a human not a geek, you\'ve just posted greek. I use a GUI.

I have 9 virtual desktops, 1 has some icons you can click on, one has a browser, one has a Usenet newsreader, one has an audio
mixer,
and 8 actually have a terminal.

Can\'t you afford real ones? I just have 5 monitors. I can see them all at once.

No need for that,


GUI is for dummies, like going to a supermarket and searching on the shelves for what you need from what is plonked down
there.

It\'s the way the human mind works, at least normal ones. If I showed you 50 pictures and asked you to find the widget, you
could do it far faster than finding the word widget in a pile of 50 words.

I can tyoe \'widgetENTER\' faster than you can find the icon, even without looking.
On top of that I use zsh as shell, so usually if I did use a command before it is just cursor up a few times and ENTER,
or the first character of the command, cursur up ENTER



My computah speaks English and I can just type commands.

It isn\'t English.

You can make it as English (or any other language) you want by writing scripts for more complex stuff
I have many of such scripts.


Much simpler and faster than mousing around in menus (if what you want is there at all).

Menus make it easy to find things. For common stuff keyboard shortcuts are always available.

Of course you need to know Unix...

No need to learn that shit.

Bye
 
On 19/04/2022 17:58, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 06:51:25 +0100, piglet <erichpwagner@hotmail.com
wrote:

On 18/04/2022 21:28, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 18:45:36 +0100, Ricky
gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote:

On Monday, April 18, 2022 at 12:27:14 PM UTC-4, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 17:02:18 +0100, charles <cha...@candehope.me.uk
wrote:

In article <op.1kts3...@ryzen.lan>,
Commander Kinsey <C...@nospam.com> wrote:
On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 08:02:11 +0100, Jan Panteltje
pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote:

On a sunny day (Sun, 17 Apr 2022 14:08:22 -0600) it happened
rbowman
bow...@montana.com> wrote in <jc3adk...@mid.individual.net>:

On 04/17/2022 10:51 AM, Jan Panteltje wrote:
What\'s a modern programmer? One that uses that snake language
\'python\' or so?
I like to code in asm for Microchip PIC micros, there is a lot
you can do with 256 bytes RAM and 16 kB ROM.
http://panteltje.com/panteltje/pic/scope_pic/
http://panteltje.com/panteltje/pic/index.html

While I prefer the AVR series I definitely agree. My day job is
C/C++/C#
and increasingly JavaScript with a new Angular product but when
I get
home I like to keep in simple like when I could wire-wrap up a
working
Z80 board.

Have dot doen wirewrap in ages...
http://panteltje.com/panteltje/raspberry_pi_dvb-s_transmitter/

soldering....
:)

Isn\'t wirewrap what amateurs do that can\'t solder?

Wirewrap used to be the standard for GPO wiring blocks.
Which is why they went wrong so often. Yeah lets just hope two things
touching with no solder or pressure just happen to conduct. It\'s the
way kids make stuff. Twist the wires together and hope for the best.

It is one thing to be ignorant.  It is another to publicly declare
your ignorance for all to see.

It doesn\'t take much effort at all for you to do a little research and
find that wirewrap is actually a highly reliable technique if done
according to the guidelines.

And very time consuming.

Touching things cannot be as good as welded together things.

Except wire wrap isn\'t just touching. The posts are square and the wire
wrapped under tension so the post corners bite deeply into the wire and
the torque built up in the post maintains constant high pressure gas
tight cold weld contacts. Dozens of them all in parallel. Wire wrapping
can be more reliable than soldering over temperature cycling. Voyager
and Apollo used a lot of wire wrap. And it is very quick - I used to
wire wrap prototypes faster than I could solder and needs no defluxing
after.

And you just hope they don\'t waggle loose or change size a bit under
temperature and lose that tension.

Very true however solder joint fatigue and cracking over extreme
temperature cycling was an even more serious problem. Back in the day
many studies placed wire wrap well ahead of solder for reliability. One
of the (few) benefits of RoHS is that lead free solders tend to perform
better over extreme thermal cycling.

piglet
 
On 19/04/2022 17:57, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 07:11:53 +0100, Ricky
gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote:

On Tuesday, April 19, 2022 at 1:51:35 AM UTC-4, erichp...@hotmail.com
wrote:
On 18/04/2022 21:28, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 18:45:36 +0100, Ricky
gnuarm.del...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Monday, April 18, 2022 at 12:27:14 PM UTC-4, Commander Kinsey
wrote:
On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 17:02:18 +0100, charles <cha...@candehope.me.uk
wrote:

In article <op.1kts3...@ryzen.lan>,
Commander Kinsey <C...@nospam.com> wrote:
On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 08:02:11 +0100, Jan Panteltje
pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote:

On a sunny day (Sun, 17 Apr 2022 14:08:22 -0600) it happened
rbowman
bow...@montana.com> wrote in <jc3adk...@mid.individual.net>:

On 04/17/2022 10:51 AM, Jan Panteltje wrote:
What\'s a modern programmer? One that uses that snake language
\'python\' or so?
I like to code in asm for Microchip PIC micros, there is a
lot
you can do with 256 bytes RAM and 16 kB ROM.
http://panteltje.com/panteltje/pic/scope_pic/
http://panteltje.com/panteltje/pic/index.html

While I prefer the AVR series I definitely agree. My day
job is
C/C++/C#
and increasingly JavaScript with a new Angular product but
when
I get
home I like to keep in simple like when I could wire-wrap up a
working
Z80 board.

Have dot doen wirewrap in ages...
http://panteltje.com/panteltje/raspberry_pi_dvb-s_transmitter/

soldering....
:)

Isn\'t wirewrap what amateurs do that can\'t solder?

Wirewrap used to be the standard for GPO wiring blocks.
Which is why they went wrong so often. Yeah lets just hope two
things
touching with no solder or pressure just happen to conduct. It\'s the
way kids make stuff. Twist the wires together and hope for the best.

It is one thing to be ignorant.  It is another to publicly declare
your ignorance for all to see.

It doesn\'t take much effort at all for you to do a little research
and
find that wirewrap is actually a highly reliable technique if done
according to the guidelines.

Touching things cannot be as good as welded together things.
Except wire wrap isn\'t just touching. The posts are square and the wire
wrapped under tension so the post corners bite deeply into the wire and
the torque built up in the post maintains constant high pressure gas
tight cold weld contacts. Dozens of them all in parallel. Wire wrapping
can be more reliable than soldering over temperature cycling. Voyager
and Apollo used a lot of wire wrap. And it is very quick - I used to
wire wrap prototypes faster than I could solder and needs no defluxing
after.

Are you saying NASA flew wire wrap in space missions?

Only because soldering hadn\'t been invented.  Look in your stereo, now
look in one from 40 years ago.  They wouldn\'t change if it wasn\'t better.

There is no mass wrapping system like there is flow or wave soldering so
wrapping was always a niche technique not much seen in the mass market.

piglet
 
On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 17:12:13 GMT, Jan Panteltje, another absolutely brain
dead, troll-feeding senile ASSHOLE blathered again:


> Bye

??? You mean you are going to pull your thick head out of the unwashed
Scottish wanker\'s arse? I\'m sure he\'ll soon return and try his luck with you
again! <BG>
 
On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 18:08:01 +0100, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:

On 04/18/2022 08:54 AM, Commander Kinsey wrote:
11 of course. Why not take it as it\'s free? I bypassed the stupid TPM
requirement (which only 1 of my 7 machines passed) using something
called Rufus.

I\'ve used rufus to create bootable USB sticks for Linux distros. Same rufus?

[change of subject]

Ever fired a gun this small?
https://youtu.be/w3PHD__2wsE
FFWD to 6:10 to see a lego man being killed.
 
piglet wrote:
On 19/04/2022 17:57, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 07:11:53 +0100, Ricky
gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote:

On Tuesday, April 19, 2022 at 1:51:35 AM UTC-4, erichp...@hotmail.com
wrote:
On 18/04/2022 21:28, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 18:45:36 +0100, Ricky
gnuarm.del...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Monday, April 18, 2022 at 12:27:14 PM UTC-4, Commander Kinsey
wrote:
On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 17:02:18 +0100, charles
cha...@candehope.me.uk
wrote:

In article <op.1kts3...@ryzen.lan>,
Commander Kinsey <C...@nospam.com> wrote:
On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 08:02:11 +0100, Jan Panteltje
pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote:

On a sunny day (Sun, 17 Apr 2022 14:08:22 -0600) it happened
rbowman
bow...@montana.com> wrote in <jc3adk...@mid.individual.net>:

On 04/17/2022 10:51 AM, Jan Panteltje wrote:
What\'s a modern programmer? One that uses that snake
language
\'python\' or so?
I like to code in asm for Microchip PIC micros, there is
a lot
you can do with 256 bytes RAM and 16 kB ROM.
http://panteltje.com/panteltje/pic/scope_pic/
http://panteltje.com/panteltje/pic/index.html

While I prefer the AVR series I definitely agree. My day
job is
C/C++/C#
and increasingly JavaScript with a new Angular product but
when
I get
home I like to keep in simple like when I could wire-wrap
up a
working
Z80 board.

Have dot doen wirewrap in ages...
http://panteltje.com/panteltje/raspberry_pi_dvb-s_transmitter/

soldering....
:)

Isn\'t wirewrap what amateurs do that can\'t solder?

Wirewrap used to be the standard for GPO wiring blocks.
Which is why they went wrong so often. Yeah lets just hope two
things
touching with no solder or pressure just happen to conduct. It\'s
the
way kids make stuff. Twist the wires together and hope for the
best.

It is one thing to be ignorant.  It is another to publicly declare
your ignorance for all to see.

It doesn\'t take much effort at all for you to do a little
research and
find that wirewrap is actually a highly reliable technique if done
according to the guidelines.

Touching things cannot be as good as welded together things.
Except wire wrap isn\'t just touching. The posts are square and the wire
wrapped under tension so the post corners bite deeply into the wire and
the torque built up in the post maintains constant high pressure gas
tight cold weld contacts. Dozens of them all in parallel. Wire wrapping
can be more reliable than soldering over temperature cycling. Voyager
and Apollo used a lot of wire wrap. And it is very quick - I used to
wire wrap prototypes faster than I could solder and needs no defluxing
after.

Are you saying NASA flew wire wrap in space missions?

Only because soldering hadn\'t been invented.  Look in your stereo, now
look in one from 40 years ago.  They wouldn\'t change if it wasn\'t better.

There is no mass wrapping system like there is flow or wave soldering so
wrapping was always a niche technique not much seen in the mass market.

piglet

When I was a grad student at Ginzton Lab, Grinnell Systems donated a
brand new video processor to our group. It was about a 5-foot rack,
with an all-wirewrap backplane. Pretty impressive monstrosity at the
time (1984ish).

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal Consultant
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510

http://electrooptical.net
http://hobbs-eo.com
 
On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 18:12:13 +0100, Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo..com> wrote:

On a sunny day (Tue, 19 Apr 2022 17:56:08 +0100) it happened \"Commander
Kinsey\" <CK1@nospam.com> wrote in <op.1kvtbupfmvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:

On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 07:27:39 +0100, Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote:

On a sunny day (Mon, 18 Apr 2022 21:22:26 +0100) it happened \"Commander
Kinsey\" <CK1@nospam.com> wrote in <op.1kt77op7mvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:

On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 17:59:54 +0100, Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote:

On a sunny day (Mon, 18 Apr 2022 15:58:45 +0100) it happened \"Commander
Kinsey\" <CK1@nospam.com> wrote in <op.1kts77xamvhs6z@ryzen.lan>:

Mine appear to be limited by the CPU speed, one core is all the program will allocate per camera, so I only get 15 fps
max.
Usually 7 fps as the computer is very busy running Boinc.

yes I keep several weeks.
Been playing with the Pimoroni IR camera module on Raspberry, low resolution but detects body heat.
That has now passed the \'several weeks 24/7 on\' test.
http://panteltje.com/panteltje/newsflex/download.html#xflir

I got some cheap shit from China. It\'s never the resolution advertised, but that means they\'ll panic and give you 50% off
the
already low price.

4 security cams go into one of those 4 channel security recorders from China
Works very well, it does not record anything, I take the output via the LAN and re-encode it with ffmpeg,

How complicated, mine are just USB cams, plug straight into the PC and it records.

Well, these are Sony \'starlight\' SUPERHAD 0.01 lux PAL/NTSC cameras, need no IR LEDs, can see in the near dark,
I use those for many things (shooting down F35s comes to mind).

Yeah the low lux would be nice. I tried IR but couldn\'t find a bright enough IR light. Considering just a PIR powered white
light.

But I\'m guessing you paid a lot for a Sony camera.

Well, what\'s a lot?
about 35 USD

That\'s not a lot. I didn\'t think Sony made them that cheap. But what resolution?

USB cams over twenty meters or more cable?

I could do 100m if I wanted, what makes you think this is a problem?

Lots of loss in voltage over USB cables.
google: \'USB maximum cable length\'

Obviously I don\'t power the camera from this end! The USB cable is for the data.

Uh ok. I\'m a human not a geek, you\'ve just posted greek. I use a GUI.

I have 9 virtual desktops, 1 has some icons you can click on, one has a browser, one has a Usenet newsreader, one has an audio
mixer,
and 8 actually have a terminal.

Can\'t you afford real ones? I just have 5 monitors. I can see them all at once.

No need for that,

Yes here is, it means I can see everything at once. And by the way I only paid £50 for one and the other 4 were free.

GUI is for dummies, like going to a supermarket and searching on the shelves for what you need from what is plonked down
there.

It\'s the way the human mind works, at least normal ones. If I showed you 50 pictures and asked you to find the widget, you
could do it far faster than finding the word widget in a pile of 50 words.

I can tyoe \'widgetENTER\' faster than you can find the icon, even without looking.

You have to open the command prompt first or make it in focus.

And actually, I can just press the windows key, then enter widget (or even wid would do) then press ENTER.

To open VLC media player, I only have to press WINDOWS V L ENTER.

> On top of that I use zsh

Why does linux have such weird names? Some of the disk programs I\'m sure they deliberately made them almost the word fuck.

as shell, so usually if I did use a command before it is just cursor up a few times and ENTER,
or the first character of the command, cursur up ENTER

So exactly like windows and DOS have always done. You had to get a special shell to have command history?

My computah speaks English and I can just type commands.

It isn\'t English.

You can make it as English (or any other language) you want by writing scripts for more complex stuff
I have many of such scripts.

Writing programs to make a computer work ROTFPMSL!

Much simpler and faster than mousing around in menus (if what you want is there at all).

Menus make it easy to find things. For common stuff keyboard shortcuts are always available.

Of course you need to know Unix...

No need to learn that shit.

Bye

Ooooh you got the last word in, how childish.
 
On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 19:08:17 +0100, piglet <erichpwagner@hotmail.com> wrote:

On 19/04/2022 17:58, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 06:51:25 +0100, piglet <erichpwagner@hotmail.com
wrote:

On 18/04/2022 21:28, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 18:45:36 +0100, Ricky
gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote:

On Monday, April 18, 2022 at 12:27:14 PM UTC-4, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 17:02:18 +0100, charles <cha...@candehope.me.uk
wrote:

In article <op.1kts3...@ryzen.lan>,
Commander Kinsey <C...@nospam.com> wrote:
On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 08:02:11 +0100, Jan Panteltje
pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote:

On a sunny day (Sun, 17 Apr 2022 14:08:22 -0600) it happened
rbowman
bow...@montana.com> wrote in <jc3adk...@mid.individual.net>:

On 04/17/2022 10:51 AM, Jan Panteltje wrote:
What\'s a modern programmer? One that uses that snake language
\'python\' or so?
I like to code in asm for Microchip PIC micros, there is a lot
you can do with 256 bytes RAM and 16 kB ROM.
http://panteltje.com/panteltje/pic/scope_pic/
http://panteltje.com/panteltje/pic/index.html

While I prefer the AVR series I definitely agree. My day job is
C/C++/C#
and increasingly JavaScript with a new Angular product but when
I get
home I like to keep in simple like when I could wire-wrap up a
working
Z80 board.

Have dot doen wirewrap in ages...
http://panteltje.com/panteltje/raspberry_pi_dvb-s_transmitter/

soldering....
:)

Isn\'t wirewrap what amateurs do that can\'t solder?

Wirewrap used to be the standard for GPO wiring blocks.
Which is why they went wrong so often. Yeah lets just hope two things
touching with no solder or pressure just happen to conduct. It\'s the
way kids make stuff. Twist the wires together and hope for the best.

It is one thing to be ignorant. It is another to publicly declare
your ignorance for all to see.

It doesn\'t take much effort at all for you to do a little research and
find that wirewrap is actually a highly reliable technique if done
according to the guidelines.

And very time consuming.

Touching things cannot be as good as welded together things.

Except wire wrap isn\'t just touching. The posts are square and the wire
wrapped under tension so the post corners bite deeply into the wire and
the torque built up in the post maintains constant high pressure gas
tight cold weld contacts. Dozens of them all in parallel. Wire wrapping
can be more reliable than soldering over temperature cycling. Voyager
and Apollo used a lot of wire wrap. And it is very quick - I used to
wire wrap prototypes faster than I could solder and needs no defluxing
after.

And you just hope they don\'t waggle loose or change size a bit under
temperature and lose that tension.

Very true however solder joint fatigue and cracking over extreme
temperature cycling was an even more serious problem. Back in the day
many studies placed wire wrap well ahead of solder for reliability. One
of the (few) benefits of RoHS is that lead free solders tend to perform
better over extreme thermal cycling.

If you have something in the centre of the sun, maybe so. Still, why not wrap then solder?
 
On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 19:20:10 +0100, piglet <erichpwagner@hotmail.com> wrote:

On 19/04/2022 17:57, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 07:11:53 +0100, Ricky
gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote:

On Tuesday, April 19, 2022 at 1:51:35 AM UTC-4, erichp...@hotmail.com
wrote:
On 18/04/2022 21:28, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 18:45:36 +0100, Ricky
gnuarm.del...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Monday, April 18, 2022 at 12:27:14 PM UTC-4, Commander Kinsey
wrote:
On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 17:02:18 +0100, charles <cha...@candehope.me.uk
wrote:

In article <op.1kts3...@ryzen.lan>,
Commander Kinsey <C...@nospam.com> wrote:
On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 08:02:11 +0100, Jan Panteltje
pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote:

On a sunny day (Sun, 17 Apr 2022 14:08:22 -0600) it happened
rbowman
bow...@montana.com> wrote in <jc3adk...@mid.individual.net>:

On 04/17/2022 10:51 AM, Jan Panteltje wrote:
What\'s a modern programmer? One that uses that snake language
\'python\' or so?
I like to code in asm for Microchip PIC micros, there is a
lot
you can do with 256 bytes RAM and 16 kB ROM.
http://panteltje.com/panteltje/pic/scope_pic/
http://panteltje.com/panteltje/pic/index.html

While I prefer the AVR series I definitely agree. My day
job is
C/C++/C#
and increasingly JavaScript with a new Angular product but
when
I get
home I like to keep in simple like when I could wire-wrap up a
working
Z80 board.

Have dot doen wirewrap in ages...
http://panteltje.com/panteltje/raspberry_pi_dvb-s_transmitter/

soldering....
:)

Isn\'t wirewrap what amateurs do that can\'t solder?

Wirewrap used to be the standard for GPO wiring blocks.
Which is why they went wrong so often. Yeah lets just hope two
things
touching with no solder or pressure just happen to conduct. It\'s the
way kids make stuff. Twist the wires together and hope for the best.

It is one thing to be ignorant. It is another to publicly declare
your ignorance for all to see.

It doesn\'t take much effort at all for you to do a little research
and
find that wirewrap is actually a highly reliable technique if done
according to the guidelines.

Touching things cannot be as good as welded together things.
Except wire wrap isn\'t just touching. The posts are square and the wire
wrapped under tension so the post corners bite deeply into the wire and
the torque built up in the post maintains constant high pressure gas
tight cold weld contacts. Dozens of them all in parallel. Wire wrapping
can be more reliable than soldering over temperature cycling. Voyager
and Apollo used a lot of wire wrap. And it is very quick - I used to
wire wrap prototypes faster than I could solder and needs no defluxing
after.

Are you saying NASA flew wire wrap in space missions?

Only because soldering hadn\'t been invented. Look in your stereo, now
look in one from 40 years ago. They wouldn\'t change if it wasn\'t better.

There is no mass wrapping system like there is flow or wave soldering so
wrapping was always a niche technique not much seen in the mass market.

Yeah we don\'t hand carve car chassises any more either.
 
On 04/19/2022 01:14 PM, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 18:08:01 +0100, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:

On 04/18/2022 08:54 AM, Commander Kinsey wrote:
11 of course. Why not take it as it\'s free? I bypassed the stupid TPM
requirement (which only 1 of my 7 machines passed) using something
called Rufus.

I\'ve used rufus to create bootable USB sticks for Linux distros. Same
rufus?

[change of subject]

Ever fired a gun this small?
https://youtu.be/w3PHD__2wsE
FFWD to 6:10 to see a lego man being killed.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eB-vaGV8wy0

Small as I need to go... A friend had one and you can get more accuracy
than you would think. More than one human man has been killed with a .22.
 
On Wed, 20 Apr 2022 01:07:44 +0100, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:

On 04/19/2022 01:14 PM, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 18:08:01 +0100, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:

On 04/18/2022 08:54 AM, Commander Kinsey wrote:
11 of course. Why not take it as it\'s free? I bypassed the stupid TPM
requirement (which only 1 of my 7 machines passed) using something
called Rufus.

I\'ve used rufus to create bootable USB sticks for Linux distros. Same
rufus?

[change of subject]

Ever fired a gun this small?
https://youtu.be/w3PHD__2wsE
FFWD to 6:10 to see a lego man being killed.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eB-vaGV8wy0

Small as I need to go... A friend had one and you can get more accuracy
than you would think. More than one human man has been killed with a .22.

I laugh at Americans killing each other. At least it keeps your numbers down to the same level as your intelligence.
 
On 04/19/2022 06:31 PM, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Wed, 20 Apr 2022 01:07:44 +0100, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:

On 04/19/2022 01:14 PM, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 18:08:01 +0100, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:

On 04/18/2022 08:54 AM, Commander Kinsey wrote:
11 of course. Why not take it as it\'s free? I bypassed the stupid
TPM
requirement (which only 1 of my 7 machines passed) using something
called Rufus.

I\'ve used rufus to create bootable USB sticks for Linux distros. Same
rufus?

[change of subject]

Ever fired a gun this small?
https://youtu.be/w3PHD__2wsE
FFWD to 6:10 to see a lego man being killed.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eB-vaGV8wy0

Small as I need to go... A friend had one and you can get more accuracy
than you would think. More than one human man has been killed with a .22.

I laugh at Americans killing each other. At least it keeps your numbers
down to the same level as your intelligence.

Unfortunately it doesn\'t work that way. If you read about a mass
shooting event with many wounded and few, if any, fatalities, the
shooter(s) were black. If there were many fatalities usually the
shooter(s) were white.
 
On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 18:07:44 -0600, lowbrowwoman, the endlessly driveling,
troll-feeding, senile idiot, blabbered again:


Small as I need to go... A friend had one and you can get more accuracy
than you would think. More than one human man has been killed with a .22.

Well, is it smaller than the Scottish wanker\'s cock in your mouth, you old
cocksucking bigmouthed Yankee whore?

--
More of the senile gossip\'s absolutely idiotic senile blather:
\"I stopped for breakfast at a diner in Virginia when the state didn\'t do
DST. I remarked on the time difference and the crusty old waitress said
\'We keep God\'s time in Virginia.\'

I also lived in Ft. Wayne for a while.\"
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top