Trevor Tosspot admits he seeks a total ban on the private ow

"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:WpGdnbKsBp995QXSnZ2dnUVZ_oGdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
"SaPeIsMa" <SaPeIsMa@HotMail.com> wrote in message
news:IsKdnRUxNveRDQrSnZ2dnUVZ_jGdnZ2d@bright.net...

"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:RdSdnbD8f_FIqQrSnZ2dnUVZ_qqdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
news:jn5qdh$ch4$1@dont-email.me...


"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:cISdnUtiDZj1jQvSnZ2dnUVZ_qednZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:b5olr.6130$%E2.1787@viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com...
dechucka wrote:

"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:SVmlr.6034$v14.1894@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com...
dechucka wrote:
Would pre Howard gun laws done anything to stop the current
violence?


The current ones have not, so why were they changed?

You forgot to answer the question. Haven't seen any long arm
massacres
since Port Arthur iirc


the total homicides are not decreasing by any appreciable amount.

keep squirming


Don't need to, statistics beats phobic paranoid rhetoric.

Main statistic is no massacres using long arms since Port Arther,
rather
destroys your pov don't you think

people who seem to think that removal of the method of homicide that
they have a phobia about without altering the total homicides just
demonstrate their irrational fear about that particular inanimate
object.
What we have to do as a people is concentrate on the real causes of
homicide not what is used to commit them.

I totally agree with you. As a gun owner I am happy enough with the
current gun law but actually think that the "ban" on semi automatics
is a bit silly. Lets face it most people in Australia don't need guns
so licensing should be on a needs basis as it is now. One group who
should never be allowed to own guns imho is the "self defense lobby".

I see. So you are stating that self defense wouldn't be a legitimate
need?

In the vast majority of cases yes and those needs are covered by current
laws

LOL
A weasel response.
chuckles is dancing around like a devil in holy water

DO tell us which laws are those...

The current gun licensing laws. Try and keep up
Which current gun licensing laws ?
Be SPECIFIC, instead of trying to weasel with vague generalizations.
 
"SaPeIsMa" <SaPeIsMa@HotMail.com> wrote in message
news:wrydndRAsMbNEz3SnZ2dnUVZ_u6dnZ2d@bright.net...
"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:WpGdnbKsBp995QXSnZ2dnUVZ_oGdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"SaPeIsMa" <SaPeIsMa@HotMail.com> wrote in message
news:IsKdnRUxNveRDQrSnZ2dnUVZ_jGdnZ2d@bright.net...

"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:RdSdnbD8f_FIqQrSnZ2dnUVZ_qqdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
news:jn5qdh$ch4$1@dont-email.me...


"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:cISdnUtiDZj1jQvSnZ2dnUVZ_qednZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:b5olr.6130$%E2.1787@viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com...
dechucka wrote:

"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:SVmlr.6034$v14.1894@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com...
dechucka wrote:
Would pre Howard gun laws done anything to stop the current
violence?


The current ones have not, so why were they changed?

You forgot to answer the question. Haven't seen any long arm
massacres
since Port Arthur iirc


the total homicides are not decreasing by any appreciable
amount.

keep squirming


Don't need to, statistics beats phobic paranoid rhetoric.

Main statistic is no massacres using long arms since Port Arther,
rather
destroys your pov don't you think

people who seem to think that removal of the method of homicide that
they have a phobia about without altering the total homicides just
demonstrate their irrational fear about that particular inanimate
object.
What we have to do as a people is concentrate on the real causes of
homicide not what is used to commit them.

I totally agree with you. As a gun owner I am happy enough with the
current gun law but actually think that the "ban" on semi automatics
is a bit silly. Lets face it most people in Australia don't need guns
so licensing should be on a needs basis as it is now. One group who
should never be allowed to own guns imho is the "self defense lobby".

I see. So you are stating that self defense wouldn't be a legitimate
need?

In the vast majority of cases yes and those needs are covered by
current laws

LOL
A weasel response.
chuckles is dancing around like a devil in holy water

DO tell us which laws are those...

The current gun licensing laws. Try and keep up

Which current gun licensing laws ?
Australia's


Be SPECIFIC, instead of trying to weasel with vague generalizations.
 
"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
news:jnq0pt$1ps$1@dont-email.me...
"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3p6dnb6-D6U_2j3SnZ2dnUVZ_oSdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"SaPeIsMa" <SaPeIsMa@HotMail.com> wrote in message
news:Yv-dnbXMHI8xpj3SnZ2dnUVZ_jmdnZ2d@bright.net...

"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:lsSdnXf5w4phswLSnZ2dnUVZ_rednZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"SaPeIsMa" <SaPeIsMa@HotMail.com> wrote in message
news:aOCdnREuPbtMIQPSnZ2dnUVZ_r8AAAAA@bright.net...

"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:r5udnZn34t9o-QXSnZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"SaPeIsMa" <SaPeIsMa@HotMail.com> wrote in message
news:1OidnS-dts1yfArSnZ2dnUVZ_qWdnZ2d@bright.net...

"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:wbOdnXDFhoEPMArSnZ2dnUVZ_qqdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
message news:jn7mp2$b8n$1@dont-email.me...


"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:pZqdnQ5a9KXv1wrSnZ2dnUVZ_r2dnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
The problems caused by having the population wandering around
outways the risks of an individual benefiting from defensive
gun us

Ok....let's see your evidence for that then.

----> Insert facts, figures, other evidence, and cites for all
of it here.

US verses Australia overall homicide rate and injury and death by
gunshot

Sorry, at best that establishes a correlation, and a cherry picked
one at that.

Let's throw Mexico in there and see if your claims hold up.

Why do you want to compare the US to some 3rd world shithole unless
you consider the US that? Why don't you compare it ap[ples with
apples to a country like Canada which shares your culture and
values ecept for the gun laws


Nope?

I'd prefer apples with apples


Looks like your theory is wrong then.

no just compare it with your culurally alike northern neieghbour

Been done.
Go read:
The Samurai, the Mountie, and the Cowboy:
Should America Adopt the Gun Controls of Other Democracies
David B. Kopel

famous for "Simply put, if not for gun control, Hitler would not have
been able to murder 21 million people"


And ?
Were it not for gun-control in ALL those countries where disarmed
people were slaughtered by their own governments, would have probably
failed in the attempt

doesn't seem to be working in Syria.

So do you have ANY evidence that people in Syria are free to own arms ?
Or have they recently armed themselves to finally resist the Assad
dictatorship after decades ?

Are you seriously suggesting that you could take on the goverement with
the weapons you're allowed :)

1) You really should stop using those smileys whenever you post
something stupid
It just confirms you're being stupid
2) Armed citizens outnumber BY FAR the number of Police and Military
in the US.
As a matter of fact, States like Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan
and Pennsylvania individually have enough hunters to qualify as the 8th
largest army in the world.

rifles against armoure vehicles and the Airforce WOW

Yep... because the people in those vehicles and aircraft aren't bullet
proof and sooner or later they do have to get out.

What good is your air force when all your pilots are dead?

What good is the best fighter in the world when someone pumps a few rounds
through the engine during takeoff?

Maybe get to the fuel and add a few adulterants to it that will eventually
destroy the engine using that fuel?

After all, the military and police are dependent upon a civilian
infrastructure for their needs from food to ammo. Without them all the
best geewhizz toys in the world won't keep them from defeat.
I think the armed forces given their experience may know about these dangers
 
"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:baKdnZM1LMR6Bz3SnZ2dnUVZ_uWdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
news:jnq0pt$1ps$1@dont-email.me...


"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3p6dnb6-D6U_2j3SnZ2dnUVZ_oSdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"SaPeIsMa" <SaPeIsMa@HotMail.com> wrote in message
news:Yv-dnbXMHI8xpj3SnZ2dnUVZ_jmdnZ2d@bright.net...

"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:lsSdnXf5w4phswLSnZ2dnUVZ_rednZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"SaPeIsMa" <SaPeIsMa@HotMail.com> wrote in message
news:aOCdnREuPbtMIQPSnZ2dnUVZ_r8AAAAA@bright.net...

"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:r5udnZn34t9o-QXSnZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"SaPeIsMa" <SaPeIsMa@HotMail.com> wrote in message
news:1OidnS-dts1yfArSnZ2dnUVZ_qWdnZ2d@bright.net...

"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:wbOdnXDFhoEPMArSnZ2dnUVZ_qqdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
message news:jn7mp2$b8n$1@dont-email.me...


"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:pZqdnQ5a9KXv1wrSnZ2dnUVZ_r2dnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
The problems caused by having the population wandering around
outways the risks of an individual benefiting from defensive
gun us

Ok....let's see your evidence for that then.

----> Insert facts, figures, other evidence, and cites for all
of it here.

US verses Australia overall homicide rate and injury and death
by gunshot

Sorry, at best that establishes a correlation, and a cherry
picked one at that.

Let's throw Mexico in there and see if your claims hold up.

Why do you want to compare the US to some 3rd world shithole
unless you consider the US that? Why don't you compare it ap[ples
with apples to a country like Canada which shares your culture and
values ecept for the gun laws


Nope?

I'd prefer apples with apples


Looks like your theory is wrong then.

no just compare it with your culurally alike northern neieghbour

Been done.
Go read:
The Samurai, the Mountie, and the Cowboy:
Should America Adopt the Gun Controls of Other Democracies
David B. Kopel

famous for "Simply put, if not for gun control, Hitler would not
have been able to murder 21 million people"


And ?
Were it not for gun-control in ALL those countries where disarmed
people were slaughtered by their own governments, would have probably
failed in the attempt

doesn't seem to be working in Syria.

So do you have ANY evidence that people in Syria are free to own arms ?
Or have they recently armed themselves to finally resist the Assad
dictatorship after decades ?

Are you seriously suggesting that you could take on the goverement
with the weapons you're allowed :)

1) You really should stop using those smileys whenever you post
something stupid
It just confirms you're being stupid
2) Armed citizens outnumber BY FAR the number of Police and Military
in the US.
As a matter of fact, States like Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan
and Pennsylvania individually have enough hunters to qualify as the 8th
largest army in the world.

rifles against armoure vehicles and the Airforce WOW

Yep... because the people in those vehicles and aircraft aren't bullet
proof and sooner or later they do have to get out.

What good is your air force when all your pilots are dead?

What good is the best fighter in the world when someone pumps a few
rounds through the engine during takeoff?

Maybe get to the fuel and add a few adulterants to it that will
eventually destroy the engine using that fuel?

After all, the military and police are dependent upon a civilian
infrastructure for their needs from food to ammo. Without them all the
best geewhizz toys in the world won't keep them from defeat.

I think the armed forces given their experience may know about these
dangers
Know about them?

Certainly

Able to do much about them?

That's really the problem, isn't it?
 
"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
news:jnq8ca$5dl$1@dont-email.me...
"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:baKdnZM1LMR6Bz3SnZ2dnUVZ_uWdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
news:jnq0pt$1ps$1@dont-email.me...


"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3p6dnb6-D6U_2j3SnZ2dnUVZ_oSdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"SaPeIsMa" <SaPeIsMa@HotMail.com> wrote in message
news:Yv-dnbXMHI8xpj3SnZ2dnUVZ_jmdnZ2d@bright.net...

"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:lsSdnXf5w4phswLSnZ2dnUVZ_rednZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"SaPeIsMa" <SaPeIsMa@HotMail.com> wrote in message
news:aOCdnREuPbtMIQPSnZ2dnUVZ_r8AAAAA@bright.net...

"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:r5udnZn34t9o-QXSnZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"SaPeIsMa" <SaPeIsMa@HotMail.com> wrote in message
news:1OidnS-dts1yfArSnZ2dnUVZ_qWdnZ2d@bright.net...

"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:wbOdnXDFhoEPMArSnZ2dnUVZ_qqdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
message news:jn7mp2$b8n$1@dont-email.me...


"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:pZqdnQ5a9KXv1wrSnZ2dnUVZ_r2dnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
The problems caused by having the population wandering around
outways the risks of an individual benefiting from defensive
gun us

Ok....let's see your evidence for that then.

----> Insert facts, figures, other evidence, and cites for all
of it here.

US verses Australia overall homicide rate and injury and death
by gunshot

Sorry, at best that establishes a correlation, and a cherry
picked one at that.

Let's throw Mexico in there and see if your claims hold up.

Why do you want to compare the US to some 3rd world shithole
unless you consider the US that? Why don't you compare it ap[ples
with apples to a country like Canada which shares your culture
and values ecept for the gun laws


Nope?

I'd prefer apples with apples


Looks like your theory is wrong then.

no just compare it with your culurally alike northern neieghbour

Been done.
Go read:
The Samurai, the Mountie, and the Cowboy:
Should America Adopt the Gun Controls of Other Democracies
David B. Kopel

famous for "Simply put, if not for gun control, Hitler would not
have been able to murder 21 million people"


And ?
Were it not for gun-control in ALL those countries where disarmed
people were slaughtered by their own governments, would have
probably failed in the attempt

doesn't seem to be working in Syria.

So do you have ANY evidence that people in Syria are free to own arms
?
Or have they recently armed themselves to finally resist the Assad
dictatorship after decades ?

Are you seriously suggesting that you could take on the goverement
with the weapons you're allowed :)

1) You really should stop using those smileys whenever you post
something stupid
It just confirms you're being stupid
2) Armed citizens outnumber BY FAR the number of Police and
Military in the US.
As a matter of fact, States like Minnesota, Wisconsin,
Michigan and Pennsylvania individually have enough hunters to qualify
as the 8th largest army in the world.

rifles against armoure vehicles and the Airforce WOW

Yep... because the people in those vehicles and aircraft aren't bullet
proof and sooner or later they do have to get out.

What good is your air force when all your pilots are dead?

What good is the best fighter in the world when someone pumps a few
rounds through the engine during takeoff?

Maybe get to the fuel and add a few adulterants to it that will
eventually destroy the engine using that fuel?

After all, the military and police are dependent upon a civilian
infrastructure for their needs from food to ammo. Without them all the
best geewhizz toys in the world won't keep them from defeat.

I think the armed forces given their experience may know about these
dangers

Know about them?

Certainly

Able to do much about them?

That's really the problem, isn't it?
given the weaponry on each side I know who I'd put my money on
 
"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:r56dnTl_1svM4AXSnZ2dnUVZ_vGdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
"SaPeIsMa" <SaPeIsMa@HotMail.com> wrote in message
news:S9SdnZRWKeWnDArSnZ2dnUVZ_uOdnZ2d@bright.net...

"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:rrSdnTVG9PlsqgrSnZ2dnUVZ_o-dnZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"atec77" <"atec77 "@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:jn5p64$4u6$1@dont-email.me...
On 24/04/2012 6:28 PM, dechucka wrote:

"Rheilly Phoull" <rheilly@bigslong.com> wrote in message
news:vYSdnT-wx62VvQvSnZ2dnUVZ_u-dnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
On 4/24/2012 5:01 AM, dechucka wrote:

"Rheilly Phoull" <rheilly@bigslong.com> wrote in message
news:xI-dna1zJveMJQnSnZ2dnUVZ_vCdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
On 4/22/2012 3:35 PM, dechucka wrote:

"Rheilly Phoull" <rheilly@bigslong.com> wrote in message
news:bPydnYXHCvDk1w7SnZ2dnUVZ_s-dnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
On 4/22/2012 7:30 AM, John-Melb wrote:
On Apr 22, 4:33 am, Trevor
Wilson<tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au
wrote:

**No, we do not. Handguns are unnecessary in modern society
(despite
the
delusions that afflict your good wife). The sooner they are
banned
completely and possession laws can then be stengthened, the
better.
Naturally, semi-auto and auto handguns must be banned
immediately.

--
Trevor Wilsonwww.rageaudio.com.au

With apologies to the Reverend Neimoller.

First they come for the semi-auto's, I didn't speak out, I
didn't
own



It should be up to the individual to have that choice should they
feel
the need.

No it shouldn't because by feeling the need they automatically show
themselves to unsuitable to hold a gun license
Liar , the desire to protect ones self and family IS the very reason to
own small arms , passing a fair test for carry is terribly difficult
and determines well that the permit holder is reliable and safe in
ownership

So those who don't pass this test don't have the right to protect their
families? That is sick.


You just blew your original position out of the water, chuckles
After all YOU are the one claiming that
" feeling the need (to be armed for self-defense)
they automatically show themselves
to (be) unsuitable to hold a gun license"
By your definition ANYONE who feels the need to prepare to protect their
families are
"unsuitable to hold a gun license"(your words)


Kid down my way nearly got abducted should he have the right to carry
for protection?

More intellectual dishonesty from chuckles
There is a difference between adults and kids
Although your false argument basically ignores that

Come on don't kids have the right to protection by carrying?
"..right to protection by carrying" ?
Carrying what, chucklehead ?

It takes a real idiot to keep repeating the same ignorant cant
Why do you need to prove you're an idiot ?

Kids have a right to be protected while they are too small or young to
protect themselves
And the adults around them have a moral duty to provide that
"protection" for the kids as long as they are too small or young to protect
themselves

You on the other had fall into the "incompetent" category for adults.
You also must be "protected" by society, since you are too stupid to
"protect yourself", not to mention reproduce.



Come on it is all in if guns are for protection

What is that nonsense phrase supposed to mean ?

If guns are a valid form of protection and don't cause any other problems
than the entire population should have the right to carry
False argument again
There are members of society, such as the young, the aged and the infirm who
for some reason or other are unable to protect themselves even though they
do have a right to "protection"
They are supposed to be protected by the rest of society.
You most clearly fall into the "infirm" category.
 
"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:LrKdnTOXKsORLQXSnZ2dnUVZ_smdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
news:jna8b7$1a6$1@dont-email.me...


"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:wbOdnXDFhoEPMArSnZ2dnUVZ_qqdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
news:jn7mp2$b8n$1@dont-email.me...


"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:pZqdnQ5a9KXv1wrSnZ2dnUVZ_r2dnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
The problems caused by having the population wandering around
outways the risks of an individual benefiting from defensive gun us

Ok....let's see your evidence for that then.

----> Insert facts, figures, other evidence, and cites for all of it
here.

US verses Australia overall homicide rate and injury and death by
gunshot

Sorry, at best that establishes a correlation, and a cherry picked one
at that.

Let's throw Mexico in there and see if your claims hold up.

Why do you want to compare the US to some 3rd world shithole

Because you claim it's all about the gun control. As such it shouldn't
matter what sort of country it is.

Are you saying your theories only work if you cherry pick the countries?

But since you want to use 1st world countries...

Then let's compare to South Africa then.

It's a first world nation with strict gun control and another example of
the wonderfully low murder rates you claim always results from that.

Classic cherry picking on your part. You seem to enjoy the exceptions not
the norms
It's no more cherry-picking than you trying to cherry-pick with Australia or
Canada
In this case, South Africa, as a First-World country, CLEARLY counters your
objection to Mexico.
It also CLEARLY blows out your claim that gun-laws will make you safer
You can also use Switzerland or Finland, 2 other First-World countries with
loose gun laws and low crime and homicide rates.
The only one trying to cherry-pick here is you.
There is NO CAUSATIVE data to support your claim that gun-control has ANY
effect on the crime rate.
All you have is the odd correlation, and that proves NOTHING.




unless you consider the US that?

In some ways I do.

Why don't you compare it ap[ples with apples to a
country like Canada which shares your culture and values ecept for the
gun laws

Canada doesn't share our culture and values, nor is it the same in
everything except gun control.

A lot closer than Mexico
PROVE IT


Your claim that it is clearly shows your denial of the differences that
exist. Social differences, Economic Differences. Political differences.
Demographic differences. Enforcement differences. All are differences
that impact crime and crime rates.

you forgot gun control differences

Too bad that both the CDC and NAS in separate and independent studies
concluded that there is NO EVIDENCE to support the claim that gun-control
has an effect on the crime rate.
And the CDC had it's knuckles rapped by Congress a few years before it made
that study for putting forth gun-control propaganda that was not based on
hard or valid data.
 
"F Murtz" <haggiszzz@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jnadpu$mei$1@dont-email.me...
dechucka wrote:

"SaPeIsMa" <SaPeIsMa@HotMail.com> wrote in message
news:S9SdnZRWKeWnDArSnZ2dnUVZ_uOdnZ2d@bright.net...

"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:rrSdnTVG9PlsqgrSnZ2dnUVZ_o-dnZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"atec77" <"atec77 "@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:jn5p64$4u6$1@dont-email.me...
On 24/04/2012 6:28 PM, dechucka wrote:

"Rheilly Phoull" <rheilly@bigslong.com> wrote in message
news:vYSdnT-wx62VvQvSnZ2dnUVZ_u-dnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
On 4/24/2012 5:01 AM, dechucka wrote:

"Rheilly Phoull" <rheilly@bigslong.com> wrote in message
news:xI-dna1zJveMJQnSnZ2dnUVZ_vCdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
On 4/22/2012 3:35 PM, dechucka wrote:

"Rheilly Phoull" <rheilly@bigslong.com> wrote in message
news:bPydnYXHCvDk1w7SnZ2dnUVZ_s-dnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
On 4/22/2012 7:30 AM, John-Melb wrote:
On Apr 22, 4:33 am, Trevor
Wilson<tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au
wrote:

**No, we do not. Handguns are unnecessary in modern society
(despite
the
delusions that afflict your good wife). The sooner they are
banned
completely and possession laws can then be stengthened, the
better.
Naturally, semi-auto and auto handguns must be banned
immediately.

--
Trevor Wilsonwww.rageaudio.com.au

With apologies to the Reverend Neimoller.

First they come for the semi-auto's, I didn't speak out, I
didn't
own



It should be up to the individual to have that choice should they
feel
the need.

No it shouldn't because by feeling the need they automatically show
themselves to unsuitable to hold a gun license
Liar , the desire to protect ones self and family IS the very reason
to own small arms , passing a fair test for carry is terribly
difficult and determines well that the permit holder is reliable and
safe in ownership

So those who don't pass this test don't have the right to protect
their families? That is sick.


You just blew your original position out of the water, chuckles
After all YOU are the one claiming that
" feeling the need (to be armed for self-defense)
they automatically show themselves
to (be) unsuitable to hold a gun license"
By your definition ANYONE who feels the need to prepare to protect
their families are
"unsuitable to hold a gun license"(your words)


Kid down my way nearly got abducted should he have the right to carry
for protection?

More intellectual dishonesty from chuckles
There is a difference between adults and kids
Although your false argument basically ignores that

Come on don't kids have the right to protection by carrying?



Come on it is all in if guns are for protection

What is that nonsense phrase supposed to mean

If guns are a valid form of protection and don't cause any other
problems than the entire population should have the right to carry

I think that there are places in America where that is almost the case,
they seem to have few firearm problems.
Vermont has been that way since it was founded.
Minimal restrictions on where and how to carry
One of the lowest crime rates in the country
Alaska has recently amended it's State Constitution to what Vermont has.

But chucklehead is trying to play word games.
Elsewhere he posted that children (of any age) should have the right to
carry.
It's some kind of stupid attempt to argue all or nothing.
 
"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:sbydnYzoNobReATSnZ2dnUVZ_umdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
news:jncm8k$rjj$1@dont-email.me...


"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:-uadnRQLBZj1dQXSnZ2dnUVZ_g6dnZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
news:jnaftj$v23$1@dont-email.me...


"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:LrKdnTOXKsORLQXSnZ2dnUVZ_smdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
news:jna8b7$1a6$1@dont-email.me...


"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:wbOdnXDFhoEPMArSnZ2dnUVZ_qqdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
news:jn7mp2$b8n$1@dont-email.me...


"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:pZqdnQ5a9KXv1wrSnZ2dnUVZ_r2dnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
The problems caused by having the population wandering around
outways the risks of an individual benefiting from defensive gun
us

Ok....let's see your evidence for that then.

----> Insert facts, figures, other evidence, and cites for all of
it here.

US verses Australia overall homicide rate and injury and death by
gunshot

Sorry, at best that establishes a correlation, and a cherry picked
one at that.

Let's throw Mexico in there and see if your claims hold up.

Why do you want to compare the US to some 3rd world shithole

Because you claim it's all about the gun control. As such it
shouldn't matter what sort of country it is.

Are you saying your theories only work if you cherry pick the
countries?

But since you want to use 1st world countries...

Then let's compare to South Africa then.

It's a first world nation with strict gun control and another example
of the wonderfully low murder rates you claim always results from
that.

Classic cherry picking on your part. You seem to enjoy the exceptions
not the norms

I see... First I pick a close neighbor of the US and you say that's not
right because I should pick a 1st world nation

So I pick a first world nation, and again you're unhappy.


no I am perfectly happy for you to discuss the situation in SA. I'll
discuss Aus, NZ, Canada, France, Germany etc etc

Go right ahead....one case is all that is needed to disprove your theory
and since you've accepted one that means your theory as it stands is
crap.

so one exception proves the rule does it?
LOL
Not even smart enough to get that right.
It's ONE exception is ALL IT TAKES to DISprove the rule.

Poor chucklehead.


Try again when you can come up with a theory that accounts for all the
known facts.

your may be correct and Americans are just homicidal maniacs who would
find other ways to kill each other at such a high rate without guns
LOL
Now we know the source of your stupidity
Blind bigotry
 
"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Tuednenv-fLfZwTSnZ2dnUVZ_rWdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
news:jncr4m$ht5$1@dont-email.me...


"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:sbydnYzoNobReATSnZ2dnUVZ_umdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
news:jncm8k$rjj$1@dont-email.me...


"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:-uadnRQLBZj1dQXSnZ2dnUVZ_g6dnZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
news:jnaftj$v23$1@dont-email.me...


"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:LrKdnTOXKsORLQXSnZ2dnUVZ_smdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
news:jna8b7$1a6$1@dont-email.me...


"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:wbOdnXDFhoEPMArSnZ2dnUVZ_qqdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
message news:jn7mp2$b8n$1@dont-email.me...


"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:pZqdnQ5a9KXv1wrSnZ2dnUVZ_r2dnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
The problems caused by having the population wandering around
outways the risks of an individual benefiting from defensive
gun us

Ok....let's see your evidence for that then.

----> Insert facts, figures, other evidence, and cites for all
of it here.

US verses Australia overall homicide rate and injury and death
by gunshot

Sorry, at best that establishes a correlation, and a cherry
picked one at that.

Let's throw Mexico in there and see if your claims hold up.

Why do you want to compare the US to some 3rd world shithole

Because you claim it's all about the gun control. As such it
shouldn't matter what sort of country it is.

Are you saying your theories only work if you cherry pick the
countries?

But since you want to use 1st world countries...

Then let's compare to South Africa then.

It's a first world nation with strict gun control and another
example of the wonderfully low murder rates you claim always
results from that.

Classic cherry picking on your part. You seem to enjoy the
exceptions not the norms

I see... First I pick a close neighbor of the US and you say that's
not right because I should pick a 1st world nation

So I pick a first world nation, and again you're unhappy.


no I am perfectly happy for you to discuss the situation in SA. I'll
discuss Aus, NZ, Canada, France, Germany etc etc

Go right ahead....one case is all that is needed to disprove your
theory and since you've accepted one that means your theory as it
stands is crap.

so one exception proves the rule does it?

It certainly does disprove the theory though.

Try again when you can come up with a theory that accounts for all the
known facts.

your may be correct and Americans are just homicidal maniacs who would
find other ways to kill each other at such a high rate without guns

That's probably the truest thing you've said yet.

See, it's not the presence of weapons that makes people kill.....but the
willingness to do so.

We need to address those with that willingness as a short term solution
and the causes of what produces that willingness as a long term solution.

IMO, a lot of our problem ties into the War on Drugs which fuels all
manner of violence in our society. From people committing violent crimes
to finance their 'fix' to dealers killing each other over 'turf' to drug
lords fighting with law enforcement to protect their 'product'.

I've seen statistics in the US that indicate that over 50% of all violent
crime (including homicide) involves illegal drugs and that some 90% of
violent criminals have detectable levels of illegal drugs in their system
when arrested.

A similar massive violence occurred with prohibition, and largely ended
with the repeal of prohibition.

Now don't get me wrong. I have absolutely no use for illegal drugs, and I
believe those that use them tend towards the stupid, but it does IMO do
much to create the elements necessary for much of our violent crime and
homicides.

We've been trying to control illegal drugs going on 60 years now without
success. Maybe it's time to consider doing something else instead?

unfortunately guns give a hands off and to a certain extent an impersonal
way of killing
Another statement shows how ignorant you are
Most shootings can be summarized by the rule "3 shots, 3 yards, 3 seconds"
At 3 yards or less, shooting someone is neither "hands off" or "impersonal".
 
"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:dKGdnSGFaLCVjAfSnZ2dnUVZ_sqdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
news:jncvjf$5bq$1@dont-email.me...


"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Tuednenv-fLfZwTSnZ2dnUVZ_rWdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
news:jncr4m$ht5$1@dont-email.me...


"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:sbydnYzoNobReATSnZ2dnUVZ_umdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
news:jncm8k$rjj$1@dont-email.me...


"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:-uadnRQLBZj1dQXSnZ2dnUVZ_g6dnZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
news:jnaftj$v23$1@dont-email.me...


"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:LrKdnTOXKsORLQXSnZ2dnUVZ_smdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
message news:jna8b7$1a6$1@dont-email.me...


"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:wbOdnXDFhoEPMArSnZ2dnUVZ_qqdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
message news:jn7mp2$b8n$1@dont-email.me...


"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:pZqdnQ5a9KXv1wrSnZ2dnUVZ_r2dnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
The problems caused by having the population wandering
around outways the risks of an individual benefiting from
defensive gun us

Ok....let's see your evidence for that then.

----> Insert facts, figures, other evidence, and cites for
all of it here.

US verses Australia overall homicide rate and injury and death
by gunshot

Sorry, at best that establishes a correlation, and a cherry
picked one at that.

Let's throw Mexico in there and see if your claims hold up.

Why do you want to compare the US to some 3rd world shithole

Because you claim it's all about the gun control. As such it
shouldn't matter what sort of country it is.

Are you saying your theories only work if you cherry pick the
countries?

But since you want to use 1st world countries...

Then let's compare to South Africa then.

It's a first world nation with strict gun control and another
example of the wonderfully low murder rates you claim always
results from that.

Classic cherry picking on your part. You seem to enjoy the
exceptions not the norms

I see... First I pick a close neighbor of the US and you say that's
not right because I should pick a 1st world nation

So I pick a first world nation, and again you're unhappy.


no I am perfectly happy for you to discuss the situation in SA. I'll
discuss Aus, NZ, Canada, France, Germany etc etc

Go right ahead....one case is all that is needed to disprove your
theory and since you've accepted one that means your theory as it
stands is crap.

so one exception proves the rule does it?

It certainly does disprove the theory though.

Try again when you can come up with a theory that accounts for all
the known facts.

your may be correct and Americans are just homicidal maniacs who would
find other ways to kill each other at such a high rate without guns

That's probably the truest thing you've said yet.

See, it's not the presence of weapons that makes people kill.....but
the willingness to do so.

We need to address those with that willingness as a short term solution
and the causes of what produces that willingness as a long term
solution.

IMO, a lot of our problem ties into the War on Drugs which fuels all
manner of violence in our society. From people committing violent
crimes to finance their 'fix' to dealers killing each other over 'turf'
to drug lords fighting with law enforcement to protect their 'product'.

I've seen statistics in the US that indicate that over 50% of all
violent crime (including homicide) involves illegal drugs and that some
90% of violent criminals have detectable levels of illegal drugs in
their system when arrested.

A similar massive violence occurred with prohibition, and largely ended
with the repeal of prohibition.

Now don't get me wrong. I have absolutely no use for illegal drugs, and
I believe those that use them tend towards the stupid, but it does IMO
do much to create the elements necessary for much of our violent crime
and homicides.

We've been trying to control illegal drugs going on 60 years now
without success. Maybe it's time to consider doing something else
instead?

unfortunately guns give a hands off and to a certain extent an
impersonal way of killing

So do bombs, traps, crossbows, cars, and a multitude of other means.

If this is the extent of your opposition to the points I've made, then
perhaps I've made a slight difference.

IMO we need to focus our attention and energy on the actual problem and
causes of that problem and quit wasting time and resources trying to deal
with one means of instrumentality.

There is no way that the situation re guns in the US will be solved. The
killing will continue
What killings are you babbling about now ?
Criminals killing each other ?
That's usually turf wars between gangs
Criminals killing civilians ?
So far gun-control has had NO IMPACT on that
Civilians killing criminals ?
What's the problem with that ?
I consider that a social benefit in a healthy society that is able to
control it's vermin.
 
"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:-uadnRQLBZj1dQXSnZ2dnUVZ_g6dnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
news:jnaftj$v23$1@dont-email.me...


"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:LrKdnTOXKsORLQXSnZ2dnUVZ_smdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
news:jna8b7$1a6$1@dont-email.me...


"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:wbOdnXDFhoEPMArSnZ2dnUVZ_qqdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
news:jn7mp2$b8n$1@dont-email.me...


"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:pZqdnQ5a9KXv1wrSnZ2dnUVZ_r2dnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
The problems caused by having the population wandering around
outways the risks of an individual benefiting from defensive gun
us

Ok....let's see your evidence for that then.

----> Insert facts, figures, other evidence, and cites for all of
it here.

US verses Australia overall homicide rate and injury and death by
gunshot

Sorry, at best that establishes a correlation, and a cherry picked
one at that.

Let's throw Mexico in there and see if your claims hold up.

Why do you want to compare the US to some 3rd world shithole

Because you claim it's all about the gun control. As such it shouldn't
matter what sort of country it is.

Are you saying your theories only work if you cherry pick the
countries?

But since you want to use 1st world countries...

Then let's compare to South Africa then.

It's a first world nation with strict gun control and another example
of the wonderfully low murder rates you claim always results from that.

Classic cherry picking on your part. You seem to enjoy the exceptions
not the norms

I see... First I pick a close neighbor of the US and you say that's not
right because I should pick a 1st world nation

So I pick a first world nation, and again you're unhappy.


no I am perfectly happy for you to discuss the situation in SA. I'll
discuss Aus, NZ, Canada, France, Germany etc etc


Seems you wont be happy unless the country selected agrees with your
theories....

But isn't that cherry picking?

no I think choosing SA and Mexico is
I just figured out your problem
The first 3 words of your phrase
" no I think"
We have seen no evidence of that
You >>BELIEVE<< but you don't think.


unless you consider the US that?

In some ways I do.

Why don't you compare it ap[ples with apples to a
country like Canada which shares your culture and values ecept for the
gun laws

Canada doesn't share our culture and values, nor is it the same in
everything except gun control.

A lot closer than Mexico

And South Africa is also closer since it's also a 1st world nation.

Yet, you're still unhappy.

Perfectly happy for you to keep cherry picking
And your cherry-picking of Canada and Australia and denying Mexico is OK ???
Talk about dishonest and hypocritical.


Why don't you try moving the goalpost yet again?

Your claim that it is clearly shows your denial of the differences that
exist. Social differences, Economic Differences. Political differences.
Demographic differences. Enforcement differences. All are differences
that impact crime and crime rates.

you forgot gun control differences

You don't deny those difference.
 
"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:f9ednQLh37t79wfSnZ2dnUVZ_qWdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
news:jndekj$23u$1@dont-email.me...


"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:dKGdnSGFaLCVjAfSnZ2dnUVZ_sqdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
news:jncvjf$5bq$1@dont-email.me...


"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Tuednenv-fLfZwTSnZ2dnUVZ_rWdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
news:jncr4m$ht5$1@dont-email.me...


"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:sbydnYzoNobReATSnZ2dnUVZ_umdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
news:jncm8k$rjj$1@dont-email.me...


"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:-uadnRQLBZj1dQXSnZ2dnUVZ_g6dnZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
message news:jnaftj$v23$1@dont-email.me...


"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:LrKdnTOXKsORLQXSnZ2dnUVZ_smdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
message news:jna8b7$1a6$1@dont-email.me...


"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:wbOdnXDFhoEPMArSnZ2dnUVZ_qqdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
message news:jn7mp2$b8n$1@dont-email.me...


"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:pZqdnQ5a9KXv1wrSnZ2dnUVZ_r2dnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
The problems caused by having the population wandering
around outways the risks of an individual benefiting from
defensive gun us

Ok....let's see your evidence for that then.

----> Insert facts, figures, other evidence, and cites for
all of it here.

US verses Australia overall homicide rate and injury and
death by gunshot

Sorry, at best that establishes a correlation, and a cherry
picked one at that.

Let's throw Mexico in there and see if your claims hold up.

Why do you want to compare the US to some 3rd world shithole

Because you claim it's all about the gun control. As such it
shouldn't matter what sort of country it is.

Are you saying your theories only work if you cherry pick the
countries?

But since you want to use 1st world countries...

Then let's compare to South Africa then.

It's a first world nation with strict gun control and another
example of the wonderfully low murder rates you claim always
results from that.

Classic cherry picking on your part. You seem to enjoy the
exceptions not the norms

I see... First I pick a close neighbor of the US and you say
that's not right because I should pick a 1st world nation

So I pick a first world nation, and again you're unhappy.


no I am perfectly happy for you to discuss the situation in SA.
I'll discuss Aus, NZ, Canada, France, Germany etc etc

Go right ahead....one case is all that is needed to disprove your
theory and since you've accepted one that means your theory as it
stands is crap.

so one exception proves the rule does it?

It certainly does disprove the theory though.

Try again when you can come up with a theory that accounts for all
the known facts.

your may be correct and Americans are just homicidal maniacs who
would find other ways to kill each other at such a high rate without
guns

That's probably the truest thing you've said yet.

See, it's not the presence of weapons that makes people kill.....but
the willingness to do so.

We need to address those with that willingness as a short term
solution and the causes of what produces that willingness as a long
term solution.

IMO, a lot of our problem ties into the War on Drugs which fuels all
manner of violence in our society. From people committing violent
crimes to finance their 'fix' to dealers killing each other over
'turf' to drug lords fighting with law enforcement to protect their
'product'.

I've seen statistics in the US that indicate that over 50% of all
violent crime (including homicide) involves illegal drugs and that
some 90% of violent criminals have detectable levels of illegal drugs
in their system when arrested.

A similar massive violence occurred with prohibition, and largely
ended with the repeal of prohibition.

Now don't get me wrong. I have absolutely no use for illegal drugs,
and I believe those that use them tend towards the stupid, but it
does IMO do much to create the elements necessary for much of our
violent crime and homicides.

We've been trying to control illegal drugs going on 60 years now
without success. Maybe it's time to consider doing something else
instead?

unfortunately guns give a hands off and to a certain extent an
impersonal way of killing

So do bombs, traps, crossbows, cars, and a multitude of other means.

If this is the extent of your opposition to the points I've made, then
perhaps I've made a slight difference.

IMO we need to focus our attention and energy on the actual problem and
causes of that problem and quit wasting time and resources trying to
deal with one means of instrumentality.

There is no way that the situation re guns in the US will be solved. The
killing will continue

Of course, because the situation with killing in the US isn't about the
guns.

I predict that even if somehow every gun on the planet were to disappear
and the knowledge of how to make guns was utterly eliminated....the
killing could continue basically unchanged....except for the means used.

I doubt it very much
That's because you're an absolute idiot who has no knowledge of history
People have been happily killing each other since Abel and Cain.
And for a long time there were no guns to facilitate the process..


See...the problem isn't guns, or even weapons. It's with people willing
to kill. Until you address that and do something about that...the killing
will continue no matter what the gun control laws are.

Something that there is evidence of. After all, everyplace have knives
and few have any sort of knife control, but I bet if you look you will
find a similar level of disparity in fatal stabbings as well. Of course,
the match isn't perfect since there is the well known (at least for most
people) substitution effect, but I would bet the number of murders
involving a knife in Canada is a fraction of those in the US. Is that
because Canada has strict knife control? I doubt it.

So how exactly does your theory explain why the other means of murder are
also much lower in many of the countries you consider "comparable" to the
US?

Your theory can't handle that, and I doubt you even care because IMO
pointing at homicides is just your excuse. You don't care whether it
makes sense or not. You want to prohibit guns and you're looking for an
excuse to do it.

Notice how the chucklehead is in denial
Completely ignores the rest of the argument that doesn't line up with his
fantasy universe.
 
"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3p6dnb6-D6U_2j3SnZ2dnUVZ_oSdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
"SaPeIsMa" <SaPeIsMa@HotMail.com> wrote in message
news:Yv-dnbXMHI8xpj3SnZ2dnUVZ_jmdnZ2d@bright.net...

"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:lsSdnXf5w4phswLSnZ2dnUVZ_rednZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"SaPeIsMa" <SaPeIsMa@HotMail.com> wrote in message
news:aOCdnREuPbtMIQPSnZ2dnUVZ_r8AAAAA@bright.net...

"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:r5udnZn34t9o-QXSnZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"SaPeIsMa" <SaPeIsMa@HotMail.com> wrote in message
news:1OidnS-dts1yfArSnZ2dnUVZ_qWdnZ2d@bright.net...

"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:wbOdnXDFhoEPMArSnZ2dnUVZ_qqdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
news:jn7mp2$b8n$1@dont-email.me...


"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:pZqdnQ5a9KXv1wrSnZ2dnUVZ_r2dnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
The problems caused by having the population wandering around
outways the risks of an individual benefiting from defensive gun
us

Ok....let's see your evidence for that then.

----> Insert facts, figures, other evidence, and cites for all of
it here.

US verses Australia overall homicide rate and injury and death by
gunshot

Sorry, at best that establishes a correlation, and a cherry picked
one at that.

Let's throw Mexico in there and see if your claims hold up.

Why do you want to compare the US to some 3rd world shithole unless
you consider the US that? Why don't you compare it ap[ples with
apples to a country like Canada which shares your culture and values
ecept for the gun laws


Nope?

I'd prefer apples with apples


Looks like your theory is wrong then.

no just compare it with your culurally alike northern neieghbour

Been done.
Go read:
The Samurai, the Mountie, and the Cowboy:
Should America Adopt the Gun Controls of Other Democracies
David B. Kopel

famous for "Simply put, if not for gun control, Hitler would not have
been able to murder 21 million people"


And ?
Were it not for gun-control in ALL those countries where disarmed
people were slaughtered by their own governments, would have probably
failed in the attempt

doesn't seem to be working in Syria.

So do you have ANY evidence that people in Syria are free to own arms ?
Or have they recently armed themselves to finally resist the Assad
dictatorship after decades ?

Are you seriously suggesting that you could take on the goverement with
the weapons you're allowed :)

1) You really should stop using those smileys whenever you post
something stupid
It just confirms you're being stupid
2) Armed citizens outnumber BY FAR the number of Police and Military
in the US.
As a matter of fact, States like Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan
and Pennsylvania individually have enough hunters to qualify as the 8th
largest army in the world.

rifles against armoure vehicles and the Airforce WOW
And you think those people would be stupid enough to line up in formations
against armored vehicles. or aircraft ?
WOW is right, but only for your stupidity



And they are all equipped with "high powered sniper rifles".
3) Also in the US, it's ILLEGAL for the military to act as Police
(look up Posse Commitatus).

The goverement is out to get you they will use their resources
You really don't know shit..
You're just blabbering your ignorance.


4) A great many of the police would also refuse to act illegally
against the citizens.

but the army to save America
??
Why don't you try writing complete sentences that actually make sense


5) Read up on the Battle of Athens Tennessee.
Resistance to abusive government actions has been consistent
behavior in the US
Hell, even the peace movement of the 70s was resistance to the
Government.

didn't need gums for their victory
So imagine what would happen if the guns came out
And key figures in a treasonous government start getting taken out ?
How long do you imagine that government will continue a losing battle
against the very people it was created to serve ?
Because unlike your government which was created top-down by the crown to
control it's subjects
The US government has ALWAYS been there to serve the people.
 
"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:baKdnZM1LMR6Bz3SnZ2dnUVZ_uWdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
news:jnq0pt$1ps$1@dont-email.me...


"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3p6dnb6-D6U_2j3SnZ2dnUVZ_oSdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"SaPeIsMa" <SaPeIsMa@HotMail.com> wrote in message
news:Yv-dnbXMHI8xpj3SnZ2dnUVZ_jmdnZ2d@bright.net...

"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:lsSdnXf5w4phswLSnZ2dnUVZ_rednZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"SaPeIsMa" <SaPeIsMa@HotMail.com> wrote in message
news:aOCdnREuPbtMIQPSnZ2dnUVZ_r8AAAAA@bright.net...

"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:r5udnZn34t9o-QXSnZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"SaPeIsMa" <SaPeIsMa@HotMail.com> wrote in message
news:1OidnS-dts1yfArSnZ2dnUVZ_qWdnZ2d@bright.net...

"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:wbOdnXDFhoEPMArSnZ2dnUVZ_qqdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
message news:jn7mp2$b8n$1@dont-email.me...


"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:pZqdnQ5a9KXv1wrSnZ2dnUVZ_r2dnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
The problems caused by having the population wandering around
outways the risks of an individual benefiting from defensive
gun us

Ok....let's see your evidence for that then.

----> Insert facts, figures, other evidence, and cites for all
of it here.

US verses Australia overall homicide rate and injury and death
by gunshot

Sorry, at best that establishes a correlation, and a cherry
picked one at that.

Let's throw Mexico in there and see if your claims hold up.

Why do you want to compare the US to some 3rd world shithole
unless you consider the US that? Why don't you compare it ap[ples
with apples to a country like Canada which shares your culture and
values ecept for the gun laws


Nope?

I'd prefer apples with apples


Looks like your theory is wrong then.

no just compare it with your culurally alike northern neieghbour

Been done.
Go read:
The Samurai, the Mountie, and the Cowboy:
Should America Adopt the Gun Controls of Other Democracies
David B. Kopel

famous for "Simply put, if not for gun control, Hitler would not
have been able to murder 21 million people"


And ?
Were it not for gun-control in ALL those countries where disarmed
people were slaughtered by their own governments, would have probably
failed in the attempt

doesn't seem to be working in Syria.

So do you have ANY evidence that people in Syria are free to own arms ?
Or have they recently armed themselves to finally resist the Assad
dictatorship after decades ?

Are you seriously suggesting that you could take on the goverement
with the weapons you're allowed :)

1) You really should stop using those smileys whenever you post
something stupid
It just confirms you're being stupid
2) Armed citizens outnumber BY FAR the number of Police and Military
in the US.
As a matter of fact, States like Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan
and Pennsylvania individually have enough hunters to qualify as the 8th
largest army in the world.

rifles against armoure vehicles and the Airforce WOW

Yep... because the people in those vehicles and aircraft aren't bullet
proof and sooner or later they do have to get out.

What good is your air force when all your pilots are dead?

What good is the best fighter in the world when someone pumps a few
rounds through the engine during takeoff?

Maybe get to the fuel and add a few adulterants to it that will
eventually destroy the engine using that fuel?

After all, the military and police are dependent upon a civilian
infrastructure for their needs from food to ammo. Without them all the
best geewhizz toys in the world won't keep them from defeat.

I think the armed forces given their experience may know about these
dangers
They may know about them, but since they rely on the local suppliers to
supply them, how long do you think they will last if the turn on the very
people they are supposed to protect ?
 
"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:24mdnQqYroI5LD3SnZ2dnUVZ_qydnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
news:jnq8ca$5dl$1@dont-email.me...


"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:baKdnZM1LMR6Bz3SnZ2dnUVZ_uWdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
news:jnq0pt$1ps$1@dont-email.me...


"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3p6dnb6-D6U_2j3SnZ2dnUVZ_oSdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"SaPeIsMa" <SaPeIsMa@HotMail.com> wrote in message
news:Yv-dnbXMHI8xpj3SnZ2dnUVZ_jmdnZ2d@bright.net...

"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:lsSdnXf5w4phswLSnZ2dnUVZ_rednZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"SaPeIsMa" <SaPeIsMa@HotMail.com> wrote in message
news:aOCdnREuPbtMIQPSnZ2dnUVZ_r8AAAAA@bright.net...

"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:r5udnZn34t9o-QXSnZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"SaPeIsMa" <SaPeIsMa@HotMail.com> wrote in message
news:1OidnS-dts1yfArSnZ2dnUVZ_qWdnZ2d@bright.net...

"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:wbOdnXDFhoEPMArSnZ2dnUVZ_qqdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
message news:jn7mp2$b8n$1@dont-email.me...


"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:pZqdnQ5a9KXv1wrSnZ2dnUVZ_r2dnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
The problems caused by having the population wandering
around outways the risks of an individual benefiting from
defensive gun us

Ok....let's see your evidence for that then.

----> Insert facts, figures, other evidence, and cites for
all of it here.

US verses Australia overall homicide rate and injury and death
by gunshot

Sorry, at best that establishes a correlation, and a cherry
picked one at that.

Let's throw Mexico in there and see if your claims hold up.

Why do you want to compare the US to some 3rd world shithole
unless you consider the US that? Why don't you compare it
ap[ples with apples to a country like Canada which shares your
culture and values ecept for the gun laws


Nope?

I'd prefer apples with apples


Looks like your theory is wrong then.

no just compare it with your culurally alike northern neieghbour

Been done.
Go read:
The Samurai, the Mountie, and the Cowboy:
Should America Adopt the Gun Controls of Other Democracies
David B. Kopel

famous for "Simply put, if not for gun control, Hitler would not
have been able to murder 21 million people"


And ?
Were it not for gun-control in ALL those countries where disarmed
people were slaughtered by their own governments, would have
probably failed in the attempt

doesn't seem to be working in Syria.

So do you have ANY evidence that people in Syria are free to own arms
?
Or have they recently armed themselves to finally resist the Assad
dictatorship after decades ?

Are you seriously suggesting that you could take on the goverement
with the weapons you're allowed :)

1) You really should stop using those smileys whenever you post
something stupid
It just confirms you're being stupid
2) Armed citizens outnumber BY FAR the number of Police and
Military in the US.
As a matter of fact, States like Minnesota, Wisconsin,
Michigan and Pennsylvania individually have enough hunters to qualify
as the 8th largest army in the world.

rifles against armoure vehicles and the Airforce WOW

Yep... because the people in those vehicles and aircraft aren't bullet
proof and sooner or later they do have to get out.

What good is your air force when all your pilots are dead?

What good is the best fighter in the world when someone pumps a few
rounds through the engine during takeoff?

Maybe get to the fuel and add a few adulterants to it that will
eventually destroy the engine using that fuel?

After all, the military and police are dependent upon a civilian
infrastructure for their needs from food to ammo. Without them all the
best geewhizz toys in the world won't keep them from defeat.

I think the armed forces given their experience may know about these
dangers

Know about them?

Certainly

Able to do much about them?

That's really the problem, isn't it?

given the weaponry on each side I know who I'd put my money on
Which just goes to show how really stupid you are.
Fighting an insurgency on some foreign country is nothing compared to
fighting it in your own or more importantly your neighbors backyard
Basically, you would be cut off from the very sources of your support and
all hands would be turned against you.
 
"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:qOmdnd--8vib1T3SnZ2dnUVZ_tWdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
"Addinall" <addinall@addinall.net> wrote in message
news:313db864-d1b1-4364-9cdc-82755e175881@a8g2000pbe.googlegroups.com...
On May 1, 2:47 pm, "dechucka" <dechuc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Addinall" <addin...@addinall.net> wrote in message

news:2e0d7846-80ce-4870-bed8-cb32ba305a46@l4g2000pbv.googlegroups.com...
On May 1, 10:31 am, "dechucka" <dechuc...@hotmail.com> wrote:









"SaPeIsMa" <SaPeI...@HotMail.com> wrote in message

news:aOCdnREuPbtMIQPSnZ2dnUVZ_r8AAAAA@bright.net...

"dechucka" <dechuc...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:r5udnZn34t9o-QXSnZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"SaPeIsMa" <SaPeI...@HotMail.com> wrote in message
news:1OidnS-dts1yfArSnZ2dnUVZ_qWdnZ2d@bright.net...

"dechucka" <dechuc...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:wbOdnXDFhoEPMArSnZ2dnUVZ_qqdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"Scout" <me4g...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
message
news:jn7mp2$b8n$1@dont-email.me...

"dechucka" <dechuc...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:pZqdnQ5a9KXv1wrSnZ2dnUVZ_r2dnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
The problems caused by having the population wandering around
outways the risks of an individual benefiting from defensive
gun
us

Ok....let's see your evidence for that then.

----> Insert facts, figures, other evidence, and cites for all
of
it
here.

US verses Australia overall homicide rate and injury and death
by
gunshot

Sorry, at best that establishes a correlation, and a cherry
picked
one
at that.

Let's throw Mexico in there and see if your claims hold up.

Why do you want to compare the US to some 3rd world shithole
unless
you
consider the US that? Why don't you compare it ap[ples with apples
to
a
country like Canada which shares your culture and values ecept for
the
gun laws

Nope?

I'd prefer apples with apples

Looks like your theory is wrong then.

no just compare it with your culurally alike northern neieghbour

Been done.
Go read:
The Samurai, the Mountie, and the Cowboy:
Should America Adopt the Gun Controls of Other Democracies
David B. Kopel

famous for "Simply put, if not for gun control, Hitler would not
have
been able to murder 21 million people"

And ?
Were it not for gun-control in ALL those countries where disarmed
people
were slaughtered by their own governments, would have probably failed
in
the attempt

doesn't seem to be working in Syria. Are you seriously suggesting that
you
could take on the goverement with the weapons you're allowed :)

http://www.mcmfamily.com/mcmillan-rifles-tactical-tac-50.phphttp://www.mcmfamily.com/mcmillan-rifles-tactical-tac-308.php
=================================================

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_land_vehicles_of_the_U.S._Armed_...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SPtvGCeE7zI

===================================================

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ODDSOpNkbIY&feature=fvst
And your point was what exactly ?
And Abrams tank is quite helpless if not downright useless in an insurgency
Just look at how the Soviets fared against unarmed citizens in Budapest in
1956
It wasn't until the Soviet sent in BOTH tanks and troops against a very
poorly armed and trained population.
But the US population is not that poorly armed, nor is it untrained.

The current US military is about 2,000,000 active duty and reserve
personnel.
There are about 800,000 police at all levels of government

Four out of 50 states have more armed personnel than that
And the odds are good, that not all of the above military and police would
follow illegal orders.

As to equipment, you need qualified personnel to operate and maintain it.
IF half the military personnel fail to report for duty how many military
units will be combat effective for a nationwide insurgency ?
 
"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:BbWdnYINL8zXswLSnZ2dnUVZ_tmdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:r5udnZn34t9o-QXSnZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"SaPeIsMa" <SaPeIsMa@HotMail.com> wrote in message
news:1OidnS-dts1yfArSnZ2dnUVZ_qWdnZ2d@bright.net...

"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:wbOdnXDFhoEPMArSnZ2dnUVZ_qqdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
news:jn7mp2$b8n$1@dont-email.me...


"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:pZqdnQ5a9KXv1wrSnZ2dnUVZ_r2dnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
The problems caused by having the population wandering around
outways the risks of an individual benefiting from defensive gun us

Ok....let's see your evidence for that then.

----> Insert facts, figures, other evidence, and cites for all of it
here.

US verses Australia overall homicide rate and injury and death by
gunshot

Sorry, at best that establishes a correlation, and a cherry picked one
at that.

Let's throw Mexico in there and see if your claims hold up.

Why do you want to compare the US to some 3rd world shithole unless you
consider the US that? Why don't you compare it ap[ples with apples to a
country like Canada which shares your culture and values ecept for the
gun laws


Nope?

I'd prefer apples with apples


Looks like your theory is wrong then.

no just compare it with your culurally alike northern neieghbour

Been done.
Go read:
The Samurai, the Mountie, and the Cowboy:
Should America Adopt the Gun Controls of Other Democracies
David B. Kopel

famous for "Simply put, if not for gun control, Hitler would not have
been able to murder 21 million people"

I prefer his CANADIAN GUN CONTROL: SHOULD THE UNITED STATES LOOK NORTH
FOR A SOLUTION TO ITS FIREARMS PROBLEM?. Interesting conclusion it is not
only Canadian gun laws but that Americans are homicidal maniacs that
causes the differences


what a load of crap
Indeed chuckles
Your response TO YOUR OWN POST
WAS A LOAD OF CRAP
(as usual)
 
"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:UL6dnTj78cvpBz3SnZ2dnUVZ_jidnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
"SaPeIsMa" <SaPeIsMa@HotMail.com> wrote in message
news:wrydndRAsMbNEz3SnZ2dnUVZ_u6dnZ2d@bright.net...

"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:WpGdnbKsBp995QXSnZ2dnUVZ_oGdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"SaPeIsMa" <SaPeIsMa@HotMail.com> wrote in message
news:IsKdnRUxNveRDQrSnZ2dnUVZ_jGdnZ2d@bright.net...

"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:RdSdnbD8f_FIqQrSnZ2dnUVZ_qqdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
news:jn5qdh$ch4$1@dont-email.me...


"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:cISdnUtiDZj1jQvSnZ2dnUVZ_qednZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:b5olr.6130$%E2.1787@viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com...
dechucka wrote:

"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:SVmlr.6034$v14.1894@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com...
dechucka wrote:
Would pre Howard gun laws done anything to stop the current
violence?


The current ones have not, so why were they changed?

You forgot to answer the question. Haven't seen any long arm
massacres
since Port Arthur iirc


the total homicides are not decreasing by any appreciable
amount.

keep squirming


Don't need to, statistics beats phobic paranoid rhetoric.

Main statistic is no massacres using long arms since Port Arther,
rather
destroys your pov don't you think

people who seem to think that removal of the method of homicide
that they have a phobia about without altering the total homicides
just demonstrate their irrational fear about that particular
inanimate object.
What we have to do as a people is concentrate on the real causes of
homicide not what is used to commit them.

I totally agree with you. As a gun owner I am happy enough with the
current gun law but actually think that the "ban" on semi automatics
is a bit silly. Lets face it most people in Australia don't need
guns so licensing should be on a needs basis as it is now. One group
who should never be allowed to own guns imho is the "self defense
lobby".

I see. So you are stating that self defense wouldn't be a legitimate
need?

In the vast majority of cases yes and those needs are covered by
current laws

LOL
A weasel response.
chuckles is dancing around like a devil in holy water

DO tell us which laws are those...

The current gun licensing laws. Try and keep up

Which current gun licensing laws ?


Be SPECIFIC, instead of trying to weasel with vague generalizations.





Australia's

<sigh>
Dealing with a 5 stupid year old is easier
Which current gun licensing laws in Australia
Be SPECIFIC, instead of trying to weasel with vague generalizations.
 
"SaPeIsMa" <SaPeIsMa@HotMail.com> wrote in message
news:H6-dncn-5LISCjzSnZ2dnUVZ_j6dnZ2d@bright.net...
"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:UL6dnTj78cvpBz3SnZ2dnUVZ_jidnZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"SaPeIsMa" <SaPeIsMa@HotMail.com> wrote in message
news:wrydndRAsMbNEz3SnZ2dnUVZ_u6dnZ2d@bright.net...

"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:WpGdnbKsBp995QXSnZ2dnUVZ_oGdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"SaPeIsMa" <SaPeIsMa@HotMail.com> wrote in message
news:IsKdnRUxNveRDQrSnZ2dnUVZ_jGdnZ2d@bright.net...

"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:RdSdnbD8f_FIqQrSnZ2dnUVZ_qqdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
news:jn5qdh$ch4$1@dont-email.me...


"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:cISdnUtiDZj1jQvSnZ2dnUVZ_qednZ2d@westnet.com.au...

"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:b5olr.6130$%E2.1787@viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com...
dechucka wrote:

"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:SVmlr.6034$v14.1894@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com...
dechucka wrote:
Would pre Howard gun laws done anything to stop the current
violence?


The current ones have not, so why were they changed?

You forgot to answer the question. Haven't seen any long arm
massacres
since Port Arthur iirc


the total homicides are not decreasing by any appreciable
amount.

keep squirming


Don't need to, statistics beats phobic paranoid rhetoric.

Main statistic is no massacres using long arms since Port Arther,
rather
destroys your pov don't you think

people who seem to think that removal of the method of homicide
that they have a phobia about without altering the total homicides
just demonstrate their irrational fear about that particular
inanimate object.
What we have to do as a people is concentrate on the real causes
of homicide not what is used to commit them.

I totally agree with you. As a gun owner I am happy enough with the
current gun law but actually think that the "ban" on semi
automatics is a bit silly. Lets face it most people in Australia
don't need guns so licensing should be on a needs basis as it is
now. One group who should never be allowed to own guns imho is the
"self defense lobby".

I see. So you are stating that self defense wouldn't be a legitimate
need?

In the vast majority of cases yes and those needs are covered by
current laws

LOL
A weasel response.
chuckles is dancing around like a devil in holy water

DO tell us which laws are those...

The current gun licensing laws. Try and keep up

Which current gun licensing laws ?


Be SPECIFIC, instead of trying to weasel with vague generalizations.





Australia's


sigh
Dealing with a 5 stupid year old is easier
Which current gun licensing laws in Australia
Be SPECIFIC, instead of trying to weasel with vague generalizations.
that is specific as one can get
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top