D
dechucka
Guest
"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
news:jp8maf$mrf$1@dont-email.me...
news:jp8maf$mrf$1@dont-email.me...
you mean the aus museum was wrong? Oh the shock horror"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:qrGdncN5hfYFYyvSnZ2dnUVZ_qWdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
"RD Sandman" <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:XnsA05796FE471E0hopewell@216.196.121.131...
"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:TqSdnR6iKajCJyvSnZ2dnUVZ_qGdnZ2d@westnet.com.au:
"RD Sandman" <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:XnsA0576D5A548C5hopewell@216.196.121.131...
"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:I5idndRGatsQ4CjSnZ2dnUVZ_qydnZ2d@westnet.com.au:
"RD Sandman" <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:XnsA0556CFB72031hopewell@216.196.121.131...
"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:SOqdnR09tcqRYS_SnZ2dnUVZ_gGdnZ2d@westnet.com.au:
"RD Sandman" <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:XnsA0547FDA5117Ehopewell@216.196.121.131...
"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:Z5GdnYSkEInBWSzSnZ2dnUVZ_hudnZ2d@westnet.com.au:
"RD Sandman" <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote in
message news:XnsA053B28F72090hopewell@216.196.121.131...
"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in
news_-dnXj0qYRRECzSnZ2dnUVZ_v-dnZ2d@westnet.com.au:
"SaPeIsMa" <SaPeIsMa@HotMail.com> wrote in message
news:2KadnVq-xtRUdC3SnZ2dnUVZ_oWdnZ2d@bright.net...
"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:NeGdnWgW37HfPy3SnZ2dnUVZ_vGdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
"RD Sandman" <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote in
message news:XnsA0506BFDD5B39hopewell@216.196.121.131...
"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in
newsoWdnR6JY6sg1zHSnZ2dnUVZ_uWdnZ2d@westnet.com.au:
"RD Sandman" <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote in
message news:XnsA04F938AEA2Bhopewell@216.196.121.131...
"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:vNSdnZU7RcH6rTHSnZ2dnUVZ_oadnZ2d@westnet.com.au:
"RD Sandman" <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote
in message
news:XnsA04F6892E61A7hopewell@216.196.121.131...
"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:bZudnapp8ew5aTfSnZ2dnUVZ_vednZ2d@westnet.com.au:
"RD Sandman" <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote
in message
news:XnsA04E90C996F17hopewell@216.196.121.131...
"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:rK-dnQBqZ-
XwTTfSnZ2dnUVZ_sSdnZ2d@westnet.com.au:
"RD Sandman" <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net
wrote in message
news:XnsA04E5FE98F640hopewell@216.196.121.131...
"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:m7adne2oxu3wLzTSnZ2dnUVZ_hSdnZ2d@westnet.com.au
:
"SaPeIsMa" <SaPeIsMa@HotMail.com> wrote in message
news:h4-dnUd6eenmzz7SnZ2dnUVZ_gednZ2d@bright.net...
"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in
message
news:X62dnRCZRYHxqD7SnZ2dnUVZ_qudnZ2d@westnet.com.au..
.
"SaPeIsMa" <SaPeIsMa@HotMail.com> wrote in
message
news:d8qdnZZqRe_FrT7SnZ2dnUVZ_v6dnZ2d@bright.net.
..
"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in
message
news:z9qdnXzjO_q9lz7SnZ2dnUVZ_gWdnZ2d@westnet.com.au
.. .
"SaPeIsMa" <SaPeIsMa@HotMail.com> wrote in
message
news:q_
6dneF1ZoQo8T_SnZ2dnUVZ_rudnZ2d@bright.net...
"dechucka" <dechucka1@hotmail.com> wrote in
message
news:UsmdnWMdjZHsITzSnZ2dnUVZ_r2dnZ2d@westnet.com.
au .. .
snip
Dealing with a 5 stupid year old is
easier Which current gun licensing laws
in
Australia
Be SPECIFIC, instead of trying to
weasel with vague
generalizations.
that is specific as one can get
I'll accept that as an admission you don't
know
as a gun owner I do and those are the laws
fyi
http://www.legislation.nsw.gov.au/fullhtml/inforc
e/ su bord le g+
512+
2006+FIRST+0+N
LOL
You need a permission to own a paint-ball
gun You need a permit to stage paint-ball
games
Talk about a nanny state.
Ironic that since gun control was clamped
down post Port Arthur, things have gotten
worse.
have they?
Yes they have
http://gunowners.org/sk0703.htm
* Australia: Readers of the USA Today
newspaper discovered
in 2002 that, "Since Australia's 1996
laws banning most
guns
and making it a crime to use a gun
defensively,
armed robberies rose by 51%,
unarmed robberies by 37%,
assaults by 24%
and kidnappings by 43%.
While murders fell by 3%,
manslaughter rose by 16%."
Dr. John R. Lott, Jr., "Gun laws don't reduce
crime,"
USA Today (May 9, 2002).
See also Rhett Watson and Matthew Bayley,
"Gun crime up 40pc since Port Arthur,"
The Daily Telegraph (April 28, 2002).
I'll stop there because that statement is BS
Prove it, false weasel-boi
But remember
If you get punished for keeping a loaded gun
for self defense,
you
have
effectively made it illegal to use a gun
defensively,
by making it IMPOSSIBLE UNLESS you already have a
loaded gun at hand.
In which case the government can come after
you for using that
gun
defensively.
it is not illegal to use a gun defensively in
Australia, most guns in Aus were not banned post
1996
While that is true, it is illegal in Oz to purchase
or to carry one
for
the stated purpose of self defense.
correct in all but very limited cases
With a few million citizens, "all but very limited"
doesn't help much.
but not really needed in Aus
Ahhhh, no one is ever murdered or a victim of violent
crime
in OZ? Methinks you are full of shit.
and the consequences of "carry for
protection" laws in the US can be seen by the mess
they are in.
What mess is that?
Interestingly it is very hard to find info on
defensive gun use in the US, one figure put around is
2.5 million per year but the crimes that led to guns
being drawn
don't
seem to be reported to the authorities
You can look at Gary Kleck's study.....that is where
the .25 million number
comes from.
You can look at the NCVS (National Crime Victimization
Study) it comes up with 80,000 to 108,000 per year and
never asks about DGUs. You can also look at the
following surveys:
Field 1976 3,052,717
Burdua 1977 1,414,544
DM1a 1978 2,141,512
DM1b 1978 1,098,409
Hart 1981 1,797,461
Ohio 1982 771,043
Mauser 1990 1,487,342
Gallup 1991 777,153
Gallup 1993 1,621,682
LA Times 1994 3,609,682
Tarrance 1994 764,036
so it isn't really that big a safeguard
Oh, I don't know. I would much rather be part of those
in the surveys above than one of the 10-12,000 who die
from
some
street scab with a gun.
Sorry and should add that if these figures are
correct than surely police data would back them up
When even as you suggested, most of these involve no shots
fired or the police? How would the police generate data if
they are not involved?
People are so threatened they draw a gun but don't report it
thus letting crims run free. bizarre argument
Silly dedummy.
Presumes that making a police report automatically results in
an arrest.
strawman arguement. If you report the crime there is a better
chance of an arrest
In some areas that would mean the chances would go from less
than 1% to just over 1%.
a great benefit. I'm more and more believing that DGU figures by
survey are complete and utter BS
You may feel free to believe what you want. As am I. I find my
gun to be of a great benefit and, guess what? It is always there,
it is always ready, I don't need to dial 911 and I don't have to
wait. I have been in situations before and it has never failed me
or failed to show up.
yet you don't report these crimes
The police HAVE failed to show up.
really? but probably a threat by a bear is more a wildlife situation
We sometimes get them in towns. We also sometimes get mountain
lions, coyotes,
nice puppy dogs, we get wild dogs as well
javelinas,
did the nasty piggy thing eat your veggies, my .222 took out the wild
pigs on my place
bobcats, etc..
we have feral cats bigger than that
anyhow isn't shooting wildlife in town considered illegal?
I don't live in town.
you're lucky you don't live in Aus because apart from all the snakes
spiders dingoes etc we have these
http://australianmuseum.net.au/Drop-Bear and I live in an area with lots
of gums
Right...you're afraid of an imaginary animal...
Well, that does fit in with the rest of your paranoia and phobias.