J
John Larkin
Guest
On Mon, 14 Nov 2022 12:29:14 +0000, Max Demian
<max_demian@bigfoot.com> wrote:
Consider a \"100% efficient\" gas or electric heater. A very hot element
warms room air.
But one could add a thermoelectric generator between the heat source
and the room air and get just as much hot air, but free electricity
too! Use that to make more heat.
<max_demian@bigfoot.com> wrote:
On 14/11/2022 00:27, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Thu, 10 Nov 2022 12:07:43 -0000, SteveW <steve@walker-family.me.uk
wrote:
On 09/11/2022 00:14, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Tue, 08 Nov 2022 12:35:03 -0000, Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com
wrote:
On 08/11/2022 01:22, Commander Kinsey wrote:
Even resistive heating is better than a furnace. Except for gas being
cheaper for some reason.
I find it hard to believe that you don\'t realise that this is due to
the
Second Law of Thermodynamics.
I know why it happens, just not why people use a furnace with gas. It\'s
a waste.
The highest efficiency gas fired power station is aroung 62% efficient.
Then there are 5% transmission losses.
A condensing gas boiler is over 90% efficient.
Then why don\'t they make the power station like the boiler?
Because of the Second Law of Thermodynamics, like I said. The turbines
in power stations are heat engines. Hot gas in one end; cooler gas out.
The maximum efficiency is the temperature difference between the hot and
the cold gases expressed as a percentage of the hot gas temperature,
using an absolute temperature scale like Kelvin.
Consider a \"100% efficient\" gas or electric heater. A very hot element
warms room air.
But one could add a thermoelectric generator between the heat source
and the room air and get just as much hot air, but free electricity
too! Use that to make more heat.