B
Bob Engelhardt
Guest
On 7/12/2016 11:16 PM, Danny D. wrote:
....
A more-capacitance cap would have a lower impedance and allow more
current to flow. More current in a motor means more torque.
There is still the possibility that the original cap is defective. That
the parts-place check did not measure capacitance, or if it did, it
wrongly concluded that the capacitance that it measured was the needed
value.
....
a. The old equipment tested good (as far as I could tell)
b. The jumper rig should have bypassed the relay (but not the OEM cap)
c. All this 3n1 "hard-start kit" did was replace those two things
Maybe it's a "bigger" capacitor?
http://i.cubeupload.com/8YQ1wK.jp
There's no mention on the package of how big the cap is, but physically,
the combination unit is far beefier than the OEM unit. So I dunno...
http://i.cubeupload.com/VD0haS.jpg
Do you think it could be as simple as the compressor just needed a
"beefier" cap?
Why would it need a beefier cap?
A more-capacitance cap would have a lower impedance and allow more
current to flow. More current in a motor means more torque.
There is still the possibility that the original cap is defective. That
the parts-place check did not measure capacitance, or if it did, it
wrongly concluded that the capacitance that it measured was the needed
value.