War on humanity

[John Fields]

On Sat, 08 May 2004 17:14:31 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote:

On a sunny day (Sat, 08 May 2004 06:00:35 GMT) it happened "R. Steve Walz"
rstevew@armory.com> wrote in <409C784F.899@armory.com>:


I have carefully poured over all primate research.

Chimp leadership is a separate issue entirely from sexual access,
and both issues are decided by the females by their influencing
their male supporters.
Even that sounds familiar...
Maybe we should not be fighting Bush, but the first lady?
Who else did she do it with?

---
You, Panteltje, are a disgusting pig to even hint that there is some
impropriety in the First Lady's behavior.

If you have some evidence, present it, otherwise shut your filthy
mouth.

--
John Fields

 

[Richard Henry]

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message
news:409C9CD9.7453@armory.com...

Richard Henry wrote:

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message
news:409C7EA8.814@armory.com...

Look them up yourself, search till you find them.

I know that scandalizes you, me demanding that you hunt up support
for MY argument, but what I claim is SO obvious and prevalent that
you actually SHOULD have to ACTUALLY do so before ever pretending
*I* can't!!

No one has to pretend you can't.
-----------------
Of coure they have. It's a favorite lie of the disingenuous

Disingenuous again! This month's offering from the word-of-the-month club?

to first
ignore whatever you cite, pretend you never did, or that it is not
sufficient, or they never heard of it, and then when you stop even
bothering with them to claim that you don't because you cannot.
They are merely engaging in a cynical tactic to waste your time.

You never did.

I stopped citing research over 7 years ago once I realized they
were simply playing a game. All of Anti-Science uses that tactic.

I'm not anti-science.

 

[Richard Henry]

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message
news:409CA05F.38A2@armory.com...

Richard Henry wrote:

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message
news:409C9C08.596F@armory.com...
Richard Henry wrote:

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message
news:409C7DC4.28A1@armory.com...

My claims are quite obvious.

In all the time you have been posting to usenet, has anyone ever
agreed
with
anything you said?
--------------------
I have lots of emails from people who agree with me consistently
over many years. The only ones who make negative noises are
the noisy damaged ones anyway.

I'll take that as a "no".
---------------------
Then you're nothing but a shitty little liar and must be dismissed.

Your calling me names does not prove your point - what was your point again?
Something about Communism or catching bullets in your bare hand?

 

[Rich Grise]

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message
news:409C7EA8.814@armory.com...

Rich Grise wrote:

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message
news:409AE5BF.5915@armory.com...

But what I DID say is documented elsewhere in countless places,

SO SHOW US ONE, LIAR!
------------------------
Look them up yourself, search till you find them.

I knew it. Can't do it.

Shut the fuck up, liar.

 

[Rich Grise]

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message
news:409C9CD9.7453@armory.com...

Richard Henry wrote:

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message
news:409C7EA8.814@armory.com...

Look them up yourself, search till you find them.

I know that scandalizes you, me demanding that you hunt up support
for MY argument, but what I claim is SO obvious and prevalent that
you actually SHOULD have to ACTUALLY do so before ever pretending
*I* can't!!

No one has to pretend you can't.
-----------------
Of coure they have.

No, you can't. It's that simple. You're a liar, and a fool.

You can't back up your lies.

If you could, you would have. But every chance we give you, you
just go off in some tantrum and start insulting people. Everyone
knows you're a liar - I'm just baiting you now, but that's becoming
less and less fun, because you're so easy.

And you consistently prove that you're wrong, and a liar.

That's the ONLY thing you've consistently demonstrated. If
this is not true, show a counterexample.

But you can't, or won't - ineffectual, impotent, stupid liar.

STFU.

 

[Rich Grise]

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message
news:409C784F.899@armory.com...

I have carefully poured over all primate research.

Poured what? Your booze?

 

[Rich Grise]

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message
news:409C7DC4.28A1@armory.com...

Rich Grise wrote:

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message
news:409AE8A0.32ED@armory.com...
Rich Grise wrote:

If so, let's see citations.

Put your money where your BS is.

feh.
------------------
Again you are doing nothing but posturing.

Do your own homework.
Nobody bothers with disingenuous Rightist cretins like you on here.

I knew you couldn't back up your bullshit.
----------------------
You merely posture and lie.
I have no interest in even bothering to oppose your simplex
pathological irrationality.

Of course you have "no interest." You can't. All you have is lies.

You have yet to show one single piece of evidence to back up any
of your specious claims.

You're clearly, if not a liar, then a simple dupe.

 

[Rich Grise]

"Richard Henry" <rphenry@home.com> wrote in message
news:ws0nc.23421$fE.13275@fed1read02...

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message
news:409C7DC4.28A1@armory.com...

My claims are quite obvious.

In all the time you have been posting to usenet, has anyone ever agreed
with
anything you said?


One time I agreed that he does, in fact, have schematics on his

website.

Cheers!
Rich

 

[Rich Grise]

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message
news:409C9C08.596F@armory.com...

Richard Henry wrote:

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message
news:409C7DC4.28A1@armory.com...

My claims are quite obvious.

In all the time you have been posting to usenet, has anyone ever agreed
with
anything you said?
--------------------
I have lots of emails from people who agree with me consistently
over many years. The only ones who make negative noises are
the noisy damaged ones anyway.

And, of course, you disdain to show us that, because we're
supposed to go out of our way to prove your lies to be the
truth.

Bullshit. You worthless lying piece of willessness.

You're not man enough to back up your lies - all you're "man"
enough to do is advocate child molestation and mass murder.

I don't know if you're actively, by intent, in cahoots with
the Prince of Lies, or merely a simple dupe.

 

[Rich Grise]

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message
news:409CA05F.38A2@armory.com...

Richard Henry wrote:

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message
news:409C9C08.596F@armory.com...
Richard Henry wrote:

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message
news:409C7DC4.28A1@armory.com...

My claims are quite obvious.

In all the time you have been posting to usenet, has anyone ever
agreed
with
anything you said?
--------------------
I have lots of emails from people who agree with me consistently
over many years. The only ones who make negative noises are
the noisy damaged ones anyway.

I'll take that as a "no".
---------------------
Then you're nothing but a shitty little liar and must be dismissed.

It'd be so simple to prove that your assertion is true - show us
ONE example.

You can't.

Blockhead.

 

[R. Steve Walz]

KR Williams wrote:

In article <ZZAmc.170878$L31.11346@nwrddc01.gnilink.net>,
null@example.net says...
"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message

If I need to go a mile in four minutes, I'll use a bicycle.

If King Walz allows you to have one.
------------------

Don't be stupid, I don't promote monarchies,
you cowardly disinformational fucking liar!!

Or a car. ;-)

A definite no-no in Walzland.
----------------------

A bus anywhere every 5 minutes, and dispatchable buses for planned
trips. Cars reserved for longer group trips.

If I need to lift a ton, I'll use a crane.

Nope. That would imply stealing someone's labor to build the
crane.
---------------------------

More lies. Can't you think?
Is this why you limit yourself to lying as a argumentative tactic??

If I need to design a digital signal processing system, I'll hire
somebody.

Not allowed in the Kingdom of Walz. You should be *shot* for
even thinking this way!
Keith
----------------------------

More of your cowardly ignorant lies.

-Steve
--
-Steve Walz rstevew@armory.com ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public

 

[R. Steve Walz]

Richard Henry wrote:

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message
news:409C9CD9.7453@armory.com...
Richard Henry wrote:

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message
news:409C7EA8.814@armory.com...

Look them up yourself, search till you find them.

I know that scandalizes you, me demanding that you hunt up support
for MY argument, but what I claim is SO obvious and prevalent that
you actually SHOULD have to ACTUALLY do so before ever pretending
*I* can't!!

No one has to pretend you can't.
-----------------
Of coure they have. It's a favorite lie of the disingenuous

Disingenuous again! This month's offering from the word-of-the-month club?
-----------------

It very effectively describes you using intentional lies as a phony
means of argument when you're not bright enough to think.

to first
ignore whatever you cite, pretend you never did, or that it is not
sufficient, or they never heard of it, and then when you stop even
bothering with them to claim that you don't because you cannot.
They are merely engaging in a cynical tactic to waste your time.

You never did.
-------------------------------

Nonsense. I gave up on your type of liar longer ago than you've been
around here.

I stopped citing research over 7 years ago once I realized they
were simply playing a game. All of Anti-Science uses that tactic.

I'm not anti-science.
--------------------------------

Then stop your disingenuous lying as a phony means of pseudo-argument
and undertake structural argument from reason and logic. Ah, but you'll
know that you'll lose the shit out of those, because you know that my
arguments are quite politically persuasive, and you have far too much
partisan political investment to lose to permit that.

-Steve
--
-Steve Walz rstevew@armory.com ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public

 

[R. Steve Walz]

Rich Grise wrote:

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message
news:409C7EA8.814@armory.com...
Rich Grise wrote:

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message
news:409AE5BF.5915@armory.com...

But what I DID say is documented elsewhere in countless places,

SO SHOW US ONE, LIAR!
------------------------
Look them up yourself, search till you find them.

Can't do it.
------------------------

I don't doubt that you're too stupid or lazy.

-Steve
--
-Steve Walz rstevew@armory.com ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public

 

[R. Steve Walz]

Rich Grise wrote:

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message
news:409C9CD9.7453@armory.com...
Richard Henry wrote:

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message
news:409C7EA8.814@armory.com...

Look them up yourself, search till you find them.

I know that scandalizes you, me demanding that you hunt up support
for MY argument, but what I claim is SO obvious and prevalent that
you actually SHOULD have to ACTUALLY do so before ever pretending
*I* can't!!

No one has to pretend you can't.
-----------------
Of coure they have.

No, you can't. It's that simple. You're a liar, and a fool.
----------------------

You desperately wish this were so, because you know you can't deal
logically, reasonably and honestly with my structural arguments.
And you KNOW it, or you wouldn't lie and disinform so wildly as
a means of avoiding real argument.

-Steve
--
-Steve Walz rstevew@armory.com ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public

 

[R. Steve Walz]

Rich Grise wrote:

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message
news:409C784F.899@armory.com...

I have carefully poured over all primate research.

Poured what? Your booze?
---------------

I don't drink.

-Steve
--
-Steve Walz rstevew@armory.com ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public

 

[R. Steve Walz]

Rich Grise wrote:

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message
news:409C7DC4.28A1@armory.com...
Rich Grise wrote:

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message
news:409AE8A0.32ED@armory.com...
Rich Grise wrote:

If so, let's see citations.

Put your money where your BS is.

feh.
------------------
Again you are doing nothing but posturing.

Do your own homework.
Nobody bothers with disingenuous Rightist cretins like you on here.

I knew you couldn't back up your bullshit.
----------------------
You merely posture and lie.
I have no interest in even bothering to oppose your simplex
pathological irrationality.

Of course you have "no interest." You can't. All you have is lies.
-----------------------

You desperately WISH this was so, because you KNOW you can't deal
with my arguments honestly. That's why you disinform so wildly
and so disingenuously.

-Steve
--
-Steve Walz rstevew@armory.com ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public

 

[R. Steve Walz]

Rich Grise wrote:

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message
news:409C9C08.596F@armory.com...
Richard Henry wrote:

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message
news:409C7DC4.28A1@armory.com...

My claims are quite obvious.

In all the time you have been posting to usenet, has anyone ever agreed
with
anything you said?
--------------------
I have lots of emails from people who agree with me consistently
over many years. The only ones who make negative noises are
the noisy damaged ones anyway.

And, of course, you disdain to show us that,
-----------------------

My personal emails? Why should I do that?
It's not even ethical.

because we're
supposed to go out of our way
------------------------

That's up to you and for your development.

to prove your lies to be the truth.
---------------------------

Now you're merely lying and weaseling disingenuously.
Disingenuous is a particularly good descriptive for your tactics,

because it means you are not only lying, but doing it intentionally
and without ethics and with connivance to disinform.

You're not man enough to back up your lies - all you're "man"
enough to do is advocate child molestation and mass murder.
----------------------------

That's nonsense and you're a bald-faced liar.

I don't know if you're actively, by intent, in cahoots with
the Prince of Lies, or merely a simple dupe.
----------------------------

And you believe such garbage??

-Steve
--
-Steve Walz rstevew@armory.com ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public

 

[Richard Henry]

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message
news:409D7B3F.664E@armory.com...

my arguments are quite politically persuasive,

Snork!

 

[R. Steve Walz]

Richard Henry wrote:

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message
news:409D7B3F.664E@armory.com...

my arguments are quite politically persuasive,

Snork!
----------

I know they are because they have never been reasonably refuted.

If not, then why are you so afraid that you need to lie as
your only form of argument?

-Steve
--
-Steve Walz rstevew@armory.com ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public

 

[KR Williams]

In article <409D7A27.108A@armory.com>, rstevew@armory.com says...

KR Williams wrote:

In article <ZZAmc.170878$L31.11346@nwrddc01.gnilink.net>,
null@example.net says...
"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message

If I need to go a mile in four minutes, I'll use a bicycle.

If King Walz allows you to have one.
------------------
Don't be stupid, I don't promote monarchies,
you cowardly disinformational fucking liar!!

Sure you do, bit won't admit it. If anyone in your kingdom
disagrees with you; "off with their head"! ...trial date to be
set next week. You've made that perfectly clear in your
rantings.

Or a car. ;-)

A definite no-no in Walzland.
----------------------
A bus anywhere every 5 minutes, and dispatchable buses for planned
trips. Cars reserved for longer group trips.

....or they're shot. Yep, that's the Walzland we've been hearing
so much about.

If I need to lift a ton, I'll use a crane.

Nope. That would imply stealing someone's labor to build the
crane.
---------------------------
More lies. Can't you think?
Is this why you limit yourself to lying as a argumentative tactic??

I'm just extending the "world according to Walz". SOmeone had to
pay for the labor that wen into that crane. Obviosly the one
that wanted the ton lifted didn't, since he didn't know he wanted
a ton lifted when the ore had to be mined for make the steel for
that crane.

If I need to design a digital signal processing system, I'll hire
somebody.

Not allowed in the Kingdom of Walz. You should be *shot* for
even thinking this way!
Keith
----------------------------
More of your cowardly ignorant lies.

Cowardly? ...and no lies. That's *exactly* the kingdom you've
been dreaming about for years. What a nice thing to dream; being
king of all humanity. Childish, but nice.

--
Keith