Toshiba TV29C90 problem; Image fades to black...

[Lizard Blizzard]

Matthew Montchalin wrote:

I looked around a little bit, but must have missed it, wherever it
is.

Does anybody know of a source for variable speed, tape-to-tape
duplicators (or at the least, a good magazine article somewhere for
building your own), where the tapes to be duplicated are those little
micro or miniature tape cassettes used in answering machines? I know
I will need a transport mechanism of some kind, for advancing the
tape and running it past a read/write head, so where should I look
first, and what would be a good bargain for me?

Now, in case the thing I have described is so trivial a thing to do,
how about a row of such tape-to-tape duplicators, with slide pots so
I can adjust the volumes for a whole row of such micro-sized tape
cassettes being duplicated?

The end result would be used for mixing the tapes together on a
single tape.

We have something like that, only it's for a regular compact cassette.
It's a high speed dupe, that can dupe at double or more speed. But
you're probably better off getting a service to do it.

But nowadays, almost everyone has converted to CDs. You can get those
little CDs that take up a lot less room, and cost very little to duplicate.

--
----------------(from OED Mini-Dictionary)-----------------
PUNCTUATION - Apostrophe
Incorrect uses: (i) the apostrophe must not be used with a plural
where there is no possessive sense, as in ~tea's are served here~;
(ii) there is no such word as ~her's, our's, their's, your's~.

Confusions: it's = it is or it has (not 'belonging to it'); correct
uses are ~it's here~ (= it is here); ~it's gone~ (= it has gone);
but ~the dog wagged its tail~ (no apostrophe).
----------------(For the Apostrophe challenged)----------------
From a fully deputized officer of the Apostrophe Police!

<<Spammers use Weapons of Mass Distraction!>>

I bought some batteries, but they weren't included,
so I had to buy them again.
-- Steven Wright

F
o
d
d
e
r

f
o
r

s
t
u
p
i
d

n
o
t

e
n
o
u
g
h

i
n
c
l
d
u
d
e
d

t
e
x
t

e
r
r
o
r

m
s
g
..

 

[Laceby.Man]

It is possible for a dirty head to record ok but playback very poorly i.e.
Below the video mute level "Panasonic blue screen" That is because on record
the signal is a relatively high applied current generating a large magnetic
field but on playback only a very small signal is picked up from the tape.
Also remember that this applies to all the heads on the tape path so don't
forget to clean the control head as well as the video heads. This is the one
on the bottom of the last head assembly before the pinch roller.
Hope this helps John.

 

[Matthew Montchalin]

Lizard Blizzard wrote:
|Matthew Montchalin wrote:
|> I looked around a little bit, but must have missed it, wherever it
|> is.
|>
|> Does anybody know of a source for variable speed, tape-to-tape
|> duplicators (or at the least, a good magazine article somewhere for
|> building your own), where the tapes to be duplicated are those little
|> micro or miniature tape cassettes used in answering machines? I know
|> I will need a transport mechanism of some kind, for advancing the
|> tape and running it past a read/write head, so where should I look
|> first, and what would be a good bargain for me?
|>
|> Now, in case the thing I have described is so trivial a thing to do,
|> how about a row of such tape-to-tape duplicators, with slide pots so
|> I can adjust the volumes for a whole row of such micro-sized tape
|> cassettes being duplicated?
|>
|> The end result would be used for mixing the tapes together on a
|> single tape.
|
|We have something like that, only it's for a regular compact cassette.

That's a step in the right direction.

|It's a high speed dupe, that can dupe at double or more speed.

Ah.

|But you're probably better off getting a service to do it.

They probably charge an arm and a leg, and I would like to experiment
a little bit with different speeds.

|But nowadays, almost everyone has converted to CDs.

Yes, that's true. But what shall I do with a bucket of old miniature
cassettes from years ago?

|You can get those little CDs that take up a lot less room, and cost
|very little to duplicate.

What is the typical price range for duplicating these things?

 

[Lizard Blizzard]

Matthew Montchalin wrote:

Lizard Blizzard wrote:
|Matthew Montchalin wrote:
|> I looked around a little bit, but must have missed it, wherever it
|> is.
|
|> Does anybody know of a source for variable speed, tape-to-tape
|> duplicators (or at the least, a good magazine article somewhere for
|> building your own), where the tapes to be duplicated are those little
|> micro or miniature tape cassettes used in answering machines? I know
|> I will need a transport mechanism of some kind, for advancing the
|> tape and running it past a read/write head, so where should I look
|> first, and what would be a good bargain for me?
|
|> Now, in case the thing I have described is so trivial a thing to do,
|> how about a row of such tape-to-tape duplicators, with slide pots so
|> I can adjust the volumes for a whole row of such micro-sized tape
|> cassettes being duplicated?
|
|> The end result would be used for mixing the tapes together on a
|> single tape.
|
|We have something like that, only it's for a regular compact cassette.

That's a step in the right direction.

|It's a high speed dupe, that can dupe at double or more speed.

Ah.

|But you're probably better off getting a service to do it.

They probably charge an arm and a leg, and I would like to experiment
a little bit with different speeds.

|But nowadays, almost everyone has converted to CDs.

Yes, that's true. But what shall I do with a bucket of old miniature
cassettes from years ago?

|You can get those little CDs that take up a lot less room, and cost
|very little to duplicate.

What is the typical price range for duplicating these things?

You do it yourself on your CD-RW. What is it now? Ten or twenty bucks
for a spindle of fifty? Or is that a hundred?



--
----------------(from OED Mini-Dictionary)-----------------
PUNCTUATION - Apostrophe
Incorrect uses: (i) the apostrophe must not be used with a plural
where there is no possessive sense, as in ~tea's are served here~;
(ii) there is no such word as ~her's, our's, their's, your's~.

Confusions: it's = it is or it has (not 'belonging to it'); correct
uses are ~it's here~ (= it is here); ~it's gone~ (= it has gone);
but ~the dog wagged its tail~ (no apostrophe).
----------------(For the Apostrophe challenged)----------------
From a fully deputized officer of the Apostrophe Police!

<<Spammers use Weapons of Mass Distraction!>>

I bought some batteries, but they weren't included,
so I had to buy them again.
-- Steven Wright

F
o
d
d
e
r

f
o
r

s
t
u
p
i
d

n
o
t

e
n
o
u
g
h

i
n
c
l
d
u
d
e
d

t
e
x
t

e
r
r
o
r

m
s
g
..

 

[Bob D]

.... makes perfect sense. Thank you, John. I will try cleaning those heads
again.
Regards,
Bob.

"Laceby.Man" <Johnferrier@irish4ever.com> wrote in message
news:tkKJa.2899$nG4.2474@newsfep4-winn.server.ntli.net...

It is possible for a dirty head to record ok but playback very poorly i.e.
Below the video mute level "Panasonic blue screen" That is because on
record
the signal is a relatively high applied current generating a large
magnetic
field but on playback only a very small signal is picked up from the tape.
Also remember that this applies to all the heads on the tape path so don't
forget to clean the control head as well as the video heads. This is the
one
on the bottom of the last head assembly before the pinch roller.
Hope this helps John.

 

[Laurence Payne]

thanks for your reply; yes, I cleaned it with one of those cleaning tapes
for a minute or so.
What I don't understand is: if it was dirty head, then the thing wouldn't
record properly either, would it? The same head is used to do writing, as it
is to do reading. Yet, the recorded tape is played back perfectly OK on my
other video... The thing seems to have no problems writing, but it failes
when it comes to playing the tape back ( - any tape: its own recording,
rented tapes, etc), it just failes...
Seems to me that dirty heads couldn't explain that kind of fault - or am I
wrong?

That silver drum isn't the head. It's the carrier for several heads.
Some machines have separate record and playback heads. You may be
lucky.

 

[Eric R.]

bobmarlow@postmaster.co.uk (Bob Marlow) wrote in message

System Developer position wanted in Scientific/Engineering
company or organisation.

No agencies or Mickey-Mouse speculative companies (you know
who you are) need apply.

Excellent job search strategy. Nothing says "hire me" quite like
posting off-topic on internet newsgroups asking companies to apply *TO
YOU*, and including an arrogant finish to boot. With an approach like
that, you should have no trouble in such a crappy job market.

-Eric

 

[R. Steve Walz]

idlemuse wrote:

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message news:<3EF654B3.708C@armory.com>...
idlemuse wrote:

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message

You didn't address the issue. Why does labor produce an item of
capital? Is it so they can use it or so they can sell it? Who buys
it?
---------------------------
Capital is imaginary because it is the spending of as yet unworked
available labor which is extra over that needed for common subsistence
at the current level.

This is nonsense. The economic value of a tool that amplifies
productivity 1000 times is imaginary?
-----------
Absolute contrived pseudo-incredible doctrinaire nonsense. The ONLY
thing that produces anything is labor, capital is no "amplifier" of
anything, it has nothing to amplify WITH, no "power supply".

That is a truly asinine statement.
---------------------

No, YOU'RE simply asinine.

Try building a bird house with
your
hands alone, then try it with a hammer and saw, and tell me that
again.
-----------------------------

I didn't say Just MY labor, you idiot, I said labor!
Lots of people's:
The miner, the tool maker, the truck manufacturer, the steel maker,
the lumberjack, the milling crew, the delivery truck drivers, etc.
ALL of what we get is the product of nothing but LABOR!!!

An item of capital is the
result of labor, but the question is *whose* labor?
-----------
The rich person who stole it from the laborer who produced it?
Nope, possession of lost or stolen property is a crime!


It is not imaginary to the guy who spent 5 years building it,
----------
You mean waiting for it to be built, and standing around while
someone else did the actual work?


nor to the guy who
designed it on a blackboard.
---------
He worked. Is it his, or his "owners"??

It is his if he pays the costs of production.
-------------------------

If he does it with wealth he steals from us all! He did NOTHING!

It is his until he
decides to trade it for cash. The producers of tools don't produce
tools so they can use them, they produce tools for exchange. The only
reason a factory is produced is because SOMEONE is paying an exchange
value for it to the producers that they found acceptable. Why is this
so hard for you to grasp? Why do you want the producer of the factory
not to be paid?
------------------------

You're an idiot. We all need factories, what we do NOT need is anyone
rich to OWN them!!

It is certainly not imaginary to the
folks who find themselves able to produce above subsistence solely
because someone else invested in this imaginary critter.
-----------
Stuff is not "capital", because the stuff used to attempt a new
endeavor that won't produce yet is building material and tools,
sure, but without the labor added these materiale are merely a
pile of stuff.

But it is a pile of stuff with potentially huge value. The stuff is so
valuable that it is in fact your gripe that everyone should be able to
use the stuff whether they invested in its creation or not.
---------------------------------

Those things that are a result of all previous building as a species by
our dead relatives MUST be divided fairly! They were often not produced
fairly or equitably, but we all have enough dead relatives
who were part of any faction involved to justify dividing them equally
and owning everything but our homes collectively as a People. And the
planet is automatically ours as a Species.

And the labor that made THEM is ALSO labor being
put to that new endeavor.

Uhh, no. The builder of the boat is not the fisherman. The builder of
the boat only wants the exchange value of his boat, he doesn't want to
fish. If he did, he would not accept an exchange offer for his boat
and would use it to fish himself. Once the builder has exchanged, he
can't claim a portion of the fisherman's take. The builder may choose
to lease the boat under these terms, but then he has not been paid for
it as an item of capital. He can't have it both ways.
------------------------------------

None of that is necessary. The People own all boats, the fisherman and
the boat builder work for the People. No one needs to lease anything,
he gets his commission to use Public Property for the benefit of the
Public, and so he can do his chosen work and earn his food so he doesn't
starve. Can he eat nothing but fish? Who wants to for long?

So any new endeavor will be some already
worked labor and a lot of as yet unworked labor at its inception.
And it is NOTHING ELSE!! And the worked labor is not very old,
often no more than a couple DAYS prior, as the materiale is
delivered concurrently.

The already worked labor has been paid for. The pay was the only
reason they showed up to work. If they paid the costs of production
themselves, they would own the endeavor, but if they elected to
exchange their labor for a wage and have someone else pay startup, the
person who paid owns the endeavor.
----------------------------------

The People own all of it anyway, because it is the People who decide
to defend property and under what conditions of ownership. The
ownership of the means of production belongs to Everyone, because
otherwise they can be blackmailed for their very life, and into any
slavery the blackmailer chooses, just to eat! This is how the serfs
were captured into feudalistic durance vile! The rich sent bully-boys
to burn the tribes out and claimed the land and then they prevented
them using the land unless they agreed to their slavery. The rich
"owned" the "means of production". That is the danger!!

Further, it isn't the spending of 'as yet unworked available labor'.
If that were the case, there would be no need for start up capital.
-------------------
The "start up capital" is the wage to pay for the unworked and worked
labor, as it is needed, but before it produces a social good. So it
is nothing but labor. All any society must do is authorize it, namely,
agree to feed and pay those workers while they build up that new
endeavor which is not yet producing a social good, and however the
society can decide to allocate that labor IS SUFFICIENT!

Sufficient according to who?
-------------

The People.

I don't see you building the factory,
-------------

I don't see the rich doing ANYTHING.

just telling other people what to build.
-------------

If I work hard at engineering and the People like it, then they'll
give me a fair share.

What is wrong with labor
contracting to build something without you putting your nose in it?
--------------

It is subject to fraud and theft by YOU shit who would blackmail
them into an unfair trade using their poverty. UNFAIR! The People
must STOP it!

The party who pays the costs of construction, including the exchange
value of raw materials and labor, owns the endeavor.
--------------

Not if they stole the wealth they used!! AND they DID!!

Any other arrangement is looting.
-------------

No, that's what the rich had their bully-boys did to start feudalism.
What we do to end it is NOT looting!

If 'society' decides to foot the bill for a
factory, and everyone pays for startup, then 'society' owns the
endeavor.
---------------------

Yup.

That has absolutely no bearing on a situation in which some
guy decides to foot the bill, then 'society' decides to free ride on
his investment and loot ownership from him.
-----------------------

Nope, they reclaim their rightful ownership from he who usurped it!!
The rich got rich by theft. NO one can obtain that much money in a
lifetime by earning a fair wage, and ALL OTHER means of obtaining
money ARE THEFT from the rest of us!!

Who pays the bills gets the goods.
-----------------------

Unless he stole, then we rob him, strip him, and send him packing,
or just kill him.
-Steve
--
-Steve Walz rstevew@armory.com ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public

 

[R. Steve Walz]

John Kimball wrote:

On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 02:22:09 GMT "R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com
wrote in Message id: <3EF7B61A.1F86@armory.com>:

We understand just fine, in fact AS a MAJORITY we VOLUNTARAILY GANG-UP
on ALL YOU Capitalist THIEVES in order to OUTLAW AND PREVENT YOUR
supposedly "voluntary", but actually COERCED THEFTS from the rest of
us!! IOWs, We VOLUNTARILY CONTRACT to SUPPRESS YOUR CRIMINALITY AS A
MAJORITY!! WE understand Voluntary Interaction JUST FINE! THANKS!!
IN FACT WE bring it to it's ULTIMATE HISTORICAL HUMAN FRUITION!!!

YOU SEE: *YOU* ignore the fact that the MAJORITY not ONLY outnumber
others, BUT that the Majority are ALSO the ONLY ELIGIBLE AUTHORITY
TO DECLARE AND ESTABLISH *WHICH* rights that each may claim, AND
DECIDE NOT TO PERMIT some supposedly "voluntary" forms of CHEATING
PEOPLE!! Just like current laws against FRAUD!!

YOU SEE: Individuals have NO right to decide or impose WHAT "RIGHTS"
are THEIR OWN OR ANYONE ELSE'S BEFORE the POWER of the MAJORITY of
ALL these Individuals TOGETHER! *WE* *ALL* DECIDE, AS A MAJORITY!!
And soon we're going to decide that you DON'T have the right to
cheat ANYONE, EVER, IN ANY WAY!! And your little Capitalist bully
game of "stealer's keepers, loser's weepers" will be OVER!!!

Nice rant, you kook. Out of mild curiosity, why is it that every time you
delve into your "store of knowledge", all you find is a handful of ass
lint?
---------------

So I see you don't actually have any brains to use, you poor wretch!!
-Steve
--
-Steve Walz rstevew@armory.com ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public

 

[R. Steve Walz]

Carlos Antunes wrote:

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message
news:3EF7AA17.4A40@armory.com...

THE MAJORITY will invariably come together


Majorities are dumb and, as such, cannot be trusted.
----------------

The minority of you rich criminals even less so.

Why don't you actually try to analyze and convince someone at LEAST!?


Why? I'm not a freaking Jehovah Witness!
-------------------

You're NOT?

Or are you admitting your crap is trivial and superficial?


I'm admitting the information is out there and everyone with half a neuron
is able to at least read it.

Carlos Antunes
-----------------

They can read garbage the rich paid lots of money to seed our society
with to quell questions, but you can't find a hell of a lot else, they
spend YOUR money to brainwash you too, doesn't that just gall your nuts
even a little??
-Steve
--
-Steve Walz rstevew@armory.com ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public

 

[R. Steve Walz]

Precious Pup wrote:

"R. Steve Walz" wrote:


Why don't you actually try to analyze and convince someone at LEAST!?

Smart people already know and you're too stupid and crazy anyway.
----------------------

Your opinion.
And THAT must ALSO mean that you think I'm a genius.
-Steve
--
-Steve Walz rstevew@armory.com ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public

 

[Keith R. Williams]

In article <3EF8EC57.7016@armory.com>, rstevew@armory.com says...

Precious Pup wrote:

"R. Steve Walz" wrote:


Why don't you actually try to analyze and convince someone at LEAST!?

Smart people already know and you're too stupid and crazy anyway.
----------------------
Your opinion.
And THAT must ALSO mean that you think I'm a genius.

THAT is some logic there steevie!

--
Keith

 

[R. Steve Walz]

Keith R. Williams wrote:

In article <3EF8EC57.7016@armory.com>, rstevew@armory.com says...
Precious Pup wrote:

"R. Steve Walz" wrote:


Why don't you actually try to analyze and convince someone at LEAST!?

Smart people already know and you're too stupid and crazy anyway.
----------------------
Your opinion.
And THAT must ALSO mean that you think I'm a genius.

THAT is some logic there steevie!

--
Keith
---------------------

Think about it, is he then a member of the set of "Smart People"?
-Steve
--
-Steve Walz rstevew@armory.com ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public

 

[Precious Pup]

Bill Sloman wrote:

Precious Pup <barking@wrongtree.org> wrote in message news:<3EF88727.CE65C4DD@wrongtree.org>...
"R. Steve Walz" wrote:


Why don't you actually try to analyze and convince someone at LEAST!?

Smart people already know and you're too stupid and crazy anyway.

Smart people already know - what?

"You're too stupid and crazy anyway" is not an answer to the question posted.

Retard, it is an answer, not that I could care less. If you weren't so dumb you might notice that I don't
really try to reason with you or Walznut. I might as well piss in the ocean and hope to see a difference.

RSW can at least manage coherence, which seems to beyond your feeble powers.

Okay Bill. Have it your way. Follow Steve.

 

[R. Steve Walz]

bigmike wrote:

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message
news:3EF90D1B.427D@armory.com...
Keith R. Williams wrote:

In article <3EF8EC57.7016@armory.com>, rstevew@armory.com says...
Precious Pup wrote:

"R. Steve Walz" wrote:


Why don't you actually try to analyze and convince someone at
LEAST!?

Smart people already know and you're too stupid and crazy anyway.
----------------------
Your opinion.
And THAT must ALSO mean that you think I'm a genius.

THAT is some logic there steevie!

--
Keith
---------------------
Think about it, is he then a member of the set of "Smart People"?
-Steve

Yes he is.
---------------

You missed the joke, it was an intelligence test for Rightist Retards.
They always fail, because they can't think even three levels deep.

He's a legend in his own mind, and yours being a mere subset of his,
I send you my condolences.
-Steve
--
-Steve Walz rstevew@armory.com ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public

 

[bigmike]

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message
news:3EF90D1B.427D@armory.com...

Keith R. Williams wrote:

In article <3EF8EC57.7016@armory.com>, rstevew@armory.com says...
Precious Pup wrote:

"R. Steve Walz" wrote:


Why don't you actually try to analyze and convince someone at
LEAST!?

Smart people already know and you're too stupid and crazy anyway.
----------------------
Your opinion.
And THAT must ALSO mean that you think I'm a genius.

THAT is some logic there steevie!

--
Keith
---------------------
Think about it, is he then a member of the set of "Smart People"?
-Steve

Yes he is.

 

[Carlos Antunes]

"Andrew VK3BFA" <ablight@alphalink.com.au> wrote in message
news:1fc7b362.0306250458.7e882924@posting.google.com...

So we have the nutty left battling it out with the psychotic right -
my, we have made a lot of progress in 2,000 years havent we.....

Andy, if you think I somewhat "represent" the right then you are dumber than
I initially thought.

Carlos Antunes

 

[John Kimball]

On 24 Jun 2003 14:28:38 -0700 bill.sloman@ieee.org (Bill Sloman) wrote in
Message id: <7c584d27.0306241328.630aa59f@posting.google.com>:

John Kimball <johnkimb@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<dtngfv81veqt8slnjihrt6km3vhl9s919q@4ax.com>...
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 02:22:09 GMT "R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com
wrote in Message id: <3EF7B61A.1F86@armory.com>:


We understand just fine, in fact AS a MAJORITY we VOLUNTARAILY GANG-UP
on ALL YOU Capitalist THIEVES in order to OUTLAW AND PREVENT YOUR
supposedly "voluntary", but actually COERCED THEFTS from the rest of
us!! IOWs, We VOLUNTARILY CONTRACT to SUPPRESS YOUR CRIMINALITY AS A
MAJORITY!! WE understand Voluntary Interaction JUST FINE! THANKS!!
IN FACT WE bring it to it's ULTIMATE HISTORICAL HUMAN FRUITION!!!

YOU SEE: *YOU* ignore the fact that the MAJORITY not ONLY outnumber
others, BUT that the Majority are ALSO the ONLY ELIGIBLE AUTHORITY
TO DECLARE AND ESTABLISH *WHICH* rights that each may claim, AND
DECIDE NOT TO PERMIT some supposedly "voluntary" forms of CHEATING
PEOPLE!! Just like current laws against FRAUD!!

YOU SEE: Individuals have NO right to decide or impose WHAT "RIGHTS"
are THEIR OWN OR ANYONE ELSE'S BEFORE the POWER of the MAJORITY of
ALL these Individuals TOGETHER! *WE* *ALL* DECIDE, AS A MAJORITY!!
And soon we're going to decide that you DON'T have the right to
cheat ANYONE, EVER, IN ANY WAY!! And your little Capitalist bully
game of "stealer's keepers, loser's weepers" will be OVER!!!

Nice rant, you kook. Out of mild curiosity, why is it that every time you
delve into your "store of knowledge", all you find is a handful of ass
lint?

Seems inappropriate to respond to such a nice rant with such a trivial
little insult, but trivial little minds can do no better.

If your "storehouse of knowledge" was something more than a short and
decaying list of primary school insults, you might have asked Steve
how his mythical majority was going to get together to make and
enforce these exciting decisions, but that would require thought - a
process foreign to the right-wing nerve nexus - while name-calling
merely requires the activation of a routine originally set up in
primary school, and still more or less functional after decades of
heavy use, while the higher intellectual functions have long since
atrophied from lack of use.

So, are you fuckheads two joined at the groin, or does it just appear that
way?

 

[bigmike]

"John Kimball" <johnkimb@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:gcnjfvomqlkt3pha3oq204hl1f5g8818mk@4ax.com...

On 24 Jun 2003 14:28:38 -0700 bill.sloman@ieee.org (Bill Sloman) wrote in
Message id: <7c584d27.0306241328.630aa59f@posting.google.com>:

John Kimball <johnkimb@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<dtngfv81veqt8slnjihrt6km3vhl9s919q@4ax.com>...
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 02:22:09 GMT "R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com
wrote in Message id: <3EF7B61A.1F86@armory.com>:


We understand just fine, in fact AS a MAJORITY we VOLUNTARAILY GANG-UP
on ALL YOU Capitalist THIEVES in order to OUTLAW AND PREVENT YOUR
supposedly "voluntary", but actually COERCED THEFTS from the rest of
us!! IOWs, We VOLUNTARILY CONTRACT to SUPPRESS YOUR CRIMINALITY AS A
MAJORITY!! WE understand Voluntary Interaction JUST FINE! THANKS!!
IN FACT WE bring it to it's ULTIMATE HISTORICAL HUMAN FRUITION!!!

YOU SEE: *YOU* ignore the fact that the MAJORITY not ONLY outnumber
others, BUT that the Majority are ALSO the ONLY ELIGIBLE AUTHORITY
TO DECLARE AND ESTABLISH *WHICH* rights that each may claim, AND
DECIDE NOT TO PERMIT some supposedly "voluntary" forms of CHEATING
PEOPLE!! Just like current laws against FRAUD!!

YOU SEE: Individuals have NO right to decide or impose WHAT "RIGHTS"
are THEIR OWN OR ANYONE ELSE'S BEFORE the POWER of the MAJORITY of
ALL these Individuals TOGETHER! *WE* *ALL* DECIDE, AS A MAJORITY!!
And soon we're going to decide that you DON'T have the right to
cheat ANYONE, EVER, IN ANY WAY!! And your little Capitalist bully
game of "stealer's keepers, loser's weepers" will be OVER!!!

Nice rant, you kook. Out of mild curiosity, why is it that every time
you
delve into your "store of knowledge", all you find is a handful of ass
lint?

Seems inappropriate to respond to such a nice rant with such a trivial
little insult, but trivial little minds can do no better.

If your "storehouse of knowledge" was something more than a short and
decaying list of primary school insults, you might have asked Steve
how his mythical majority was going to get together to make and
enforce these exciting decisions, but that would require thought - a
process foreign to the right-wing nerve nexus - while name-calling
merely requires the activation of a routine originally set up in
primary school, and still more or less functional after decades of
heavy use, while the higher intellectual functions have long since
atrophied from lack of use.

So, are you fuckheads two joined at the groin, or does it just appear that
way?

What gets me is how they are taking an extremely simple minded subject, and
trying to turn it into a complex, but meaningless one. They can't see the
forest for the trees, so to speak.

 

[margaret mcghee]

margaret@kingoodie.fsnet.co.uk (margaret mcghee) wrote in message news:<4519e27e.0306231930.96afe04@posting.google.com>...

margaret@kingoodie.fsnet.co.uk (margaret mcghee) wrote in message news:<4519e27e.0306231244.784f9567@posting.google.com>...
"Carlos Antunes" <spamtrap@localhost.> wrote in message news:<nrEJa.9952$VQ6.1297@lakeread01>...
"Lizard Blizzard" <NOSPAM@rsccd.org> wrote in message
news:bd73hg$334nl$3@hades.csu.net...

This is seriously off topic and you're invited to take your BS to the
proper newsgroup.


Oh boy, am I in trouble now?

Carlos Antunes


Not at all Carlos! you are in atunes with the rest of us now, but
you should
whisper only in the appropriate "sector", although if you should
renage once more you will not be banged up for any great length of
time perhaps a thousand lashes would suffice.


car lossed... nobody should dance to your antunes, this is not the sektor you
should try for education...however since you
here now i try explain to you car lowlife... the thousand lashes were 1KV.
from old sparkie V x 3 x 10 A x antunes = kar - lossed forver just a stinking
pile of smoking shite,

NB: Thought it best to include a hint of electricity to this Numpty.

Carlos,
you do not deserve most of my reply, you are certainely no numpty it's only
words... and most i should not have said irrespective of anyone's views.

Regards,
MAG.