The proper way to post to a group

"Baphomet" <fandaDEATH2SPAMMERS@catskill.net> wrote in message
news:vpa5obk7iv3i12@corp.supernews.com...
"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:ac49pvgrnn4fvepouu4g2numsuj94s37rb@4ax.com...
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 01:14:41 GMT, "John Fortier"
jfortier@rochester.rr.com> wrote:


"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:7co8pvogk8cs2gqg6q5udr8731m4a1t5lq@4ax.com...
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 20:45:45 GMT, "John Fortier"
jfortier@rochester.rr.com> wrote:


That's Mr. Fortier to you, Fields.

---
I give the respect I get, Fartier.

--
John Fields

This is clever repartee?!

---
No, it's not, but I'm not surprised you had to ask, what with your also
having to ask John Larkin whom he was quoting when, clearly, he was
quoting himself.
---

You know, the first time I got called that was in 4th grade.

---
Funny, I kind of had you figured out as having left the third grade
longer than two years ago. Perhaps you spent more time there than most?
---

Sort of puts
Fields' level of discourse in perspective, doesn't it!

---
Of course. I have to limit my discourse severely in order to supply you
with concepts your crippled intellect can handle.
---

Jonny must try harder. 3/10

---
Well, he should if he wants to play, and I promise if he does I'll not
make it too difficult for him.

You are truly a legend in your own mind John, even if in no one elses. Are
your pathetic responses to both Fortier, myself and others what you
consider
making it to difficult?

Go work on your Claris templated website John. It is, much like your
posts,
amature hour. You are old enough to know that you only get one shot at
making a good first impression. Or are you just too anal retentive to pay
a
designer to come up with a real website for your company?


Hey, I'd noticed that about their website as well. Looks like it was put
together by a bunch of 6th graders in their lunch break

And what does the company actually do? Well, apparently anything that will
turn a quick buck.

I wonder what Jonny does there; make coffee, sweep up? Resident 555 expert?

Or is he the CEO? He'd better be, because he uses the company PC to post
his dribble to the web.
 
"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:3j8apvsogv9774lt4vvokdam3f90mkg5re@4ax.com...
On 21 Oct 2003 02:06:23 -0700, bill.sloman@ieee.org (Bill Sloman) wrote:


He is trying harder, and his present level of semi-barbarism is a
tribute to his ambition to rise above his squalid environment. When
you compare his performance with that of other Texans who have tried
to compete in the real world (Dubbya comes to mind) he has achieved a
great deal. Unfortunately he still has a long way to go.

---
Ah, yesss...

The slimy Sloman Segues slickly from the subject at hand to Bush
bashing; apart from the occasional wank, his favorite tension reliever.

--
John Fields
2/10
 
"DarkMatter" <DarkMatter@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:kni9pvkcjpj6qfuefao716dck9q1nmn8gk@4ax.com...
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 18:25:58 -0700, "Baphomet"
fandaDEATH2SPAMMERS@catskill.net> Gave us:

Go get 'em Ross :)

You're a goddamned idiot for quoting 94 lines of shit to post your
one line of shit addition to it. You really are a usenet retard, eh?
S'matter D.M. (or is it B.M.) -

You post the same drivel over and over. We can't all be "experts" like
yourself. Believe that and I have Enron shares to sell.
 
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 13:44:28 GMT, "John Fortier"
<jfortier@rochester.rr.com> wrote:

The idea, Jonny, is to let them know you're not responding and thereby build
up their frustration.
---
OK, I get it. It's just a ploy to keep them on tenterhooks and
eventually have your way with them. A great moderator _you'd_ be!
---

You see, darkmatter can be safely ignored. It has no effect on me. You, on
the other hand, need to be told your fortune occasionally.
---
By a seer with 20-40 hindsight?
---

By the way, Jonny, does your boss know you use your work PC to post your
diatribes to the newsgroups?
---
Why? Do you plan on ratting me out, snitch?


--
John Fields
 
"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:1q7apv434qpg2nro5m5ahplbvg4gemcc7l@4ax.com...
On 21 Oct 2003 02:00:21 -0700, bill.sloman@ieee.org (Bill Sloman) wrote:


No. You give the respect *you* deserve.

Other people, whose expertise extends beyond 101 things a half-wit can
do with a 555, could reasonably expect more civilised behaviour, but
civilisation isn't expected to reach Texas until democracy is
established, so there is a while to go yet.

---
Geez, Bill, it seems to me that kicking down the door with both guns
blazing is hardly civilized behavior. At least it isn't considered to
be here in the wild and wooly south central US of A. Also, as far as
555's go, I've noticed that your "contributions" in that area are sorely
lacking. Perhaps when you get past the simple astable and monostable
configurations we can expect you to make some progress with the other
99?

--
John Fields
3.5/10

Why would anyone want to be an expert on an obsolescent chip which has more
information on it on the net than just about any other. Designing using the
555 is like designing using the 741 op amp; it may work, but there are so
many better ways to achieve what you need.

Obsolescent expertise, obsolescent thought processes; poor Jonny.
 
"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:gofapvg2oc23vb5vdv41d4dulruk51uugn@4ax.com...
On 21 Oct 2003 02:28:36 -0700, bill.sloman@ieee.org (Bill Sloman) wrote:


Keith, John Fields is a minor - if all too regular - contributor, and
his field of expertise - applications of the 555 - is not all that
demanding. Offending him is not difficult, and he generates so many
offensive postings that one is more or less obliged to take every
possible opportunity give him a dose of his own medicine.

That you can see him as a "core" contributor doesn't say anything good
about the quality of your perceptions. Or maybe your apples have worms
in their cores?

---
Sour grapes, Bill.

--
John Fields
2/10
 
"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:65fapv0glmvcsml7ob560k0uci4qol7k4m@4ax.com...
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 07:27:59 -0700, "Baphomet"
fandaDEATH2SPAMMERS@catskill.net> wrote:


Better three quality posts than the endless amount of baby dribble you
contribute.

---
If you really believed that you'd have to stop posting.

--
John Fields
2.5/10
 
"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:3j8apvsogv9774lt4vvokdam3f90mkg5re@4ax.com...
On 21 Oct 2003 02:06:23 -0700, bill.sloman@ieee.org (Bill Sloman) wrote:


He is trying harder, and his present level of semi-barbarism is a
tribute to his ambition to rise above his squalid environment. When
you compare his performance with that of other Texans who have tried
to compete in the real world (Dubbya comes to mind) he has achieved a
great deal. Unfortunately he still has a long way to go.

---
Ah, yesss...

The slimy Sloman Segues slickly from the subject at hand to Bush
bashing; apart from the occasional wank, his favorite tension reliever.
John posts more alliteration from the guru of the illiterati
 
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 15:00:31 GMT, "John Fortier"
<jfortier@rochester.rr.com> wrote:


Hey, I'd noticed that about their website as well. Looks like it was put
together by a bunch of 6th graders in their lunch break
---
We do KISS
---

And what does the company actually do?
---
It's all there. Can't you read without looking at pictures?
---

Well, apparently anything that will turn a quick buck.
---
Sure, as long as it adheres to our corporate charter, but we're
certainly not adverse to making money quickly. Is that a bad thing?
---

I wonder what Jonny does there; make coffee, sweep up? Resident 555 expert?
---
I take care of business.

--
John Fields
 
"Ross Mac" <macroeng@example.invalid> wrote in message
news:YD9lb.187857$0v4.14515330@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
You're a total idiot for counting them......get a life TardMaster......


"DarkMatter" <DarkMatter@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:kni9pvkcjpj6qfuefao716dck9q1nmn8gk@4ax.com...
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 18:25:58 -0700, "Baphomet"
fandaDEATH2SPAMMERS@catskill.net> Gave us:

Go get 'em Ross :)

You're a goddamned idiot for quoting 94 lines of shit to post your
one line of shit addition to it. You really are a usenet retard, eh?
We're the idiots for even responding to you B.M., oh master of the
insignificant.
 
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 15:06:50 GMT, "John Fortier"
<jfortier@rochester.rr.com> wrote:


Why would anyone want to be an expert on an obsolescent chip which has more
information on it on the net than just about any other. Designing using the
555 is like designing using the 741 op amp; it may work, but there are so
many better ways to achieve what you need.
---
Shirley you jest.

What with the introduction of the new 7555, so many possibilities have
opened up which were not viable using the classic workhorse 555 that it
boggles the mind.

--
John Fields
 
"John Fortier" <jfortier@rochester.rr.com> wrote in message
news:TBalb.40906$Sc7.36064@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message
news:3F94B8D4.576B@armory.com...
John Fortier wrote:

"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:ced5pv0l7mum7k3v48agqtlso13gk19h8k@4ax.com...
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 11:56:48 -0700, "Baphomet"
fandaDEATH2SPAMMERS@catskill.net> wrote:


As your posts on this topic are more likely to lead to a moderated
newsgroup
than less, I can only thank you for your "closeted" support :)

---
You're welcome!^)

Regardless of how I post, _this_ newsgroup won't be moderated, and I
could care less what Fortier does with any groups he chooses to
start.

--
John Fields

That's Mr. Fortier to you, Fields.
----------------------
Not a bit, you shit-faced little needle-dick.

-Steve

This is the best you can do?
Mind numbing, wouldn't you say John. I guess one of these days, we'll have
to get back to electronics but we might as well enjoy the flame war while
it's here, not that moronic responses like "you shit-faced little
needle-dick" are enjoyable or even mildly amusing.
 
"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:m1fapvs051ertjeih2mkeq2ir5bf94k6uc@4ax.com...
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 07:25:00 -0700, "Baphomet"
fandaDEATH2SPAMMERS@catskill.net> wrote:


Why does it always come down to doo doo ca ca name calling with people
like
you, Dark Matter, and Fortier?
How the hell did Fortier get in there. Mea culpa.

That's easy...

They calls 'em the way they sees 'em.
Such rapier like wit Fields.You really know how to hurt a guy. And you
accused me of an inadequate response? One day, both you and B.M. will grow
up, take a long, hard, dispassionate look at yourselves and if you survive
the trauma, be better people for it. Hope springs eternal for the hopeless.
 
"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:65fapv0glmvcsml7ob560k0uci4qol7k4m@4ax.com...
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 07:27:59 -0700, "Baphomet"
fandaDEATH2SPAMMERS@catskill.net> wrote:


Better three quality posts than the endless amount of baby dribble you
contribute.

---
If you really believed that you'd have to stop posting.
You would no doubt love that. That's the only way schmucks like you survive,
by wearing people down. Don't hold your breath.
 
"John Fortier" <jfortier@rochester.rr.com> wrote in message
news:0Lalb.40908$Sc7.15851@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:1h85pvsal5s129s8urngf3tronumkc21ic@4ax.com...
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 03:21:13 GMT, "John Fortier"
jfortier@rochester.rr.com> wrote:


"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:t2g2pvs7s2db1r09r9b7vafu237amfskou@4ax.com...
On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 02:01:42 GMT, "John Fortier"
jfortier@rochester.rr.com> wrote:
snip...snip...snip...

By the way, Jonny, does your boss know you use your work PC to post your
diatribes to the newsgroups?
You mean, I've been wasting my time with Fields and he doesn't even own the
company! How far I have fallen.
 
"John Fortier" <jfortier@rochester.rr.com> wrote in message
news:jSblb.55875$Hs.53128@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
"Baphomet" <fandaDEATH2SPAMMERS@catskill.net> wrote in message
news:vpa5obk7iv3i12@corp.supernews.com...

"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:ac49pvgrnn4fvepouu4g2numsuj94s37rb@4ax.com...
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 01:14:41 GMT, "John Fortier"
jfortier@rochester.rr.com> wrote:


"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:7co8pvogk8cs2gqg6q5udr8731m4a1t5lq@4ax.com...
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 20:45:45 GMT, "John Fortier"
jfortier@rochester.rr.com> wrote:


That's Mr. Fortier to you, Fields.

---
I give the respect I get, Fartier.

--
John Fields

This is clever repartee?!

---
No, it's not, but I'm not surprised you had to ask, what with your
also
having to ask John Larkin whom he was quoting when, clearly, he was
quoting himself.
---

You know, the first time I got called that was in 4th grade.

---
Funny, I kind of had you figured out as having left the third grade
longer than two years ago. Perhaps you spent more time there than
most?
---

Sort of puts
Fields' level of discourse in perspective, doesn't it!

---
Of course. I have to limit my discourse severely in order to supply
you
with concepts your crippled intellect can handle.
---

Jonny must try harder. 3/10

---
Well, he should if he wants to play, and I promise if he does I'll not
make it too difficult for him.

You are truly a legend in your own mind John, even if in no one elses.
Are
your pathetic responses to both Fortier, myself and others what you
consider
making it to difficult?

Go work on your Claris templated website John. It is, much like your
posts,
amature hour. You are old enough to know that you only get one shot at
making a good first impression. Or are you just too anal retentive to
pay
a
designer to come up with a real website for your company?


Hey, I'd noticed that about their website as well. Looks like it was put
together by a bunch of 6th graders in their lunch break

And what does the company actually do? Well, apparently anything that
will
turn a quick buck.

I wonder what Jonny does there; make coffee, sweep up? Resident 555
expert?

Or is he the CEO? He'd better be, because he uses the company PC to post
his dribble to the web.
:)
 
"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:9eiapvs78oap5h2ja73eivqat86ngpaiho@4ax.com...
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 13:44:28 GMT, "John Fortier"
jfortier@rochester.rr.com> wrote:

The idea, Jonny, is to let them know you're not responding and thereby
build
up their frustration.

---
OK, I get it. It's just a ploy to keep them on tenterhooks and
eventually have your way with them. A great moderator _you'd_ be!
---

You see, darkmatter can be safely ignored. It has no effect on me. You,
on
the other hand, need to be told your fortune occasionally.

---
By a seer with 20-40 hindsight?
---

By the way, Jonny, does your boss know you use your work PC to post your
diatribes to the newsgroups?

---
Why? Do you plan on ratting me out, snitch?
I doubt that Fortier would do that to you Johnny. Who would we have to laugh
at?
 
"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:9ckapv4di7r3bahtjtjvsljd998e0n7a54@4ax.com...
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 15:06:50 GMT, "John Fortier"
jfortier@rochester.rr.com> wrote:


Why would anyone want to be an expert on an obsolescent chip which has
more
information on it on the net than just about any other. Designing using
the
555 is like designing using the 741 op amp; it may work, but there are
so
many better ways to achieve what you need.

---
Shirley you jest.

What with the introduction of the new 7555, so many possibilities have
opened up which were not viable using the classic workhorse 555 that it
boggles the mind.
In all seriousness John (but just for a moment), what are the advantages of
the 7555? I haven't used a 555 for years but thought it was pretty special
when it was first introduced. It's refreshing to get a chance to get back to
electronics ;-)
 
The high level rhetoric is an attempt to take the focus off the facts!

"Baphomet" <fandaDEATH2SPAMMERS@catskill.net> wrote in message
news:vpa5sf2dprct5a@corp.supernews.com...
"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message
news:3F94B8D4.576B@armory.com...
John Fortier wrote:

"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:ced5pv0l7mum7k3v48agqtlso13gk19h8k@4ax.com...
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 11:56:48 -0700, "Baphomet"
fandaDEATH2SPAMMERS@catskill.net> wrote:


As your posts on this topic are more likely to lead to a moderated
newsgroup
than less, I can only thank you for your "closeted" support :)

---
You're welcome!^)

Regardless of how I post, _this_ newsgroup won't be moderated, and I
could care less what Fortier does with any groups he chooses to
start.

--
John Fields

That's Mr. Fortier to you, Fields.
----------------------
Not a bit, you shit-faced little needle-dick.

Why does it always come down to doo doo ca ca name calling with people
like
you, Dark Matter, and Fortier?
 
"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:rrjapv4v1vi4jpccdljgljcnvipcn0te4o@4ax.com...
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 15:00:31 GMT, "John Fortier"
jfortier@rochester.rr.com> wrote:


Hey, I'd noticed that about their website as well. Looks like it was put
together by a bunch of 6th graders in their lunch break

---
We do KISS
Emphasis on the last S
---

And what does the company actually do?

---
It's all there. Can't you read without looking at pictures?
There are no pictures
---

Well, apparently anything that will turn a quick buck.

---
Sure, as long as it adheres to our corporate charter, but we're
certainly not adverse to making money quickly. Is that a bad thing?
Depends how you make it. I hope those quick buck jobs provide your
customers with some sort of quality product.
---

I wonder what Jonny does there; make coffee, sweep up? Resident 555
expert?

---
I take care of business.
Yes, but what do you do?
--
John Fields
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top