The proper way to post to a group

Dittos ya "tube steak parasite"......


"DarkMatter" <DarkMatter@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:2ri9pvgdbq9m8ps36pd4sckh36174lnded@4ax.com...
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 04:59:38 GMT, "Ross Mac"
macroeng@example.invalid> Gave us:


Cute quote...but what does that have to do with the price of tea in
China.......nice try....whoever you are?......


As if you or anything that you say fucking matters... Jackass.
 
No doubt.....and ya gotta laugh at the munged address...
"The Bar At The End Of The Universe"....
More like "The Bong At The End Of The Universe!"
He just keeps typing the same old tire crap until he sees double or triple
then lays off for a few hours to sleep it off!
Good thing for him he has the rubber helmet and knee pads!

"Baphomet" <fandaDEATH2SPAMMERS@catskill.net> wrote in message
news:vpa684l4og5g33@corp.supernews.com...
"DarkMatter" <DarkMatter@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:2ri9pvgdbq9m8ps36pd4sckh36174lnded@4ax.com...
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 04:59:38 GMT, "Ross Mac"
macroeng@example.invalid> Gave us:


Cute quote...but what does that have to do with the price of tea in
China.......nice try....whoever you are?......


As if you or anything that you say fucking matters... Jackass.

And this from the master of nothing that matters.
 
There is a big difference between knowing a subject and just doing a "cut
and paste" from the internet.....
I could cut and past pieces from and article on motion control and not
really understand the concepts involved...It is not about memorization....it
is about understanding the concepts invovled...
That is what I meant!

"Mjolinor" <mjolinor@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:NY6lb.162$gJ5.182675@newsfep1-win.server.ntli.net...
"Mjolinor" <mjolinor@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:NKNkb.205$aw2.58@newsfep1-gui.server.ntli.net...

"Ross Mac" <macroeng@example.invalid> wrote in message
news:FMHkb.185922$0v4.14350786@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
By Google poster, your assholyness, I mean that you run to Google to
get
answers to technical questions. You have no ability to answer from
knowledge
or experience.
Just the usual, TardBoy dribble....the 4 or 5 word vocabulary that
is
from
group to group..you leave a snail trail a mile long ya little
parasite!

The single most important thing you learn from an education is that
you
commit nothing to memory unless there is no other way of having access
to
that information. Replying to posts from memory, unless they are
problems
you deal with every day, without using the facilities at your disposal
shows
(to me) that you are wasting the brain that you have. Better to
remember
how
to retrieve the information you need rather than remembering the
information, you get a whole lot more into your head that way.

"Ross Mac" <macroeng@example.invalid> wrote in message
news:_23lb.8917$Ec1.817927@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
Cute quote...but what does that have to do with the price of tea in
China.......nice try....whoever you are?......

Nothing to do with the price of tea in Chine as this would be the wrong
group for that. It was just my personal thoughts on the use of the
Internet
to solve problems. There is no difference between information posted here
from memory and posted here having been read via a Google search. The
difference is that the poster is or isn't the originator of the
information.
Either road up the information is valid and the question answered.

Dr John Dickinson
English (not British)
48 years old
Male
Married
Two children (one male 10, one female 13)
Own my own home
Drive a mercedes
Diabetic
Communication research engineer working for an American company in Europe
(they do pay well)

That's who I am if you don't like Mjolinor, if there isn't enough about me
ask again and I will reply, from memory probably without the use of Google
unless you ask me about technical publications.
 
Gurgle....cough...Gurgle.....I hear the "DarkBonger" getting charged up for
another post!
Tighten up your Huggies....I'd hate to see ya load your britches kid!!!

"DarkMatter" <DarkMatter@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:jei9pv0l6t2q9e8ahbp2dtd9stqp8tv4n1@4ax.com...
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 22:23:55 GMT, "Ross Mac"
macroeng@example.invalid> Gave us:

..(I can hear the
little dweeb bonging with his buddies as these kids compose this childish
crap).....

You're an idiot.
 
Exactly!!!! As usual the "DarkBonger" contradicts himself!
Let me guess what is next.....I will leave the 5 usual responses for him to
cut and past...then he can post when he's seeing double!...A couple a
drinks, a couple of bongs....Time to post "TardMatter"!!

1. dipshit
2. useless top posting retard
3. troll
4. shut up (Now that one makes sense?)
5. idiot
Now which one will "DarkPondScum" pick?????


"Baphomet" <fandaDEATH2SPAMMERS@catskill.net> wrote in message
news:vpa6e75vn823b2@corp.supernews.com...
"DarkMatter" <DarkMatter@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:fji9pv8r52cds6dpetp6o6jlfa9rlhe4f4@4ax.com...
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 00:24:59 +0200, "Dimitrij Klingbeil"
dklingb@cs.tu-berlin.de> Gave us:

well, I had to read the post I'm referring to to
first understand it correctly.

The question is, did you read the post to the original twit that
accused me of looking my answer up on google?

If not, shut the fuck up.

Oh, you mean the posts that you don't make, aren't archived by Google, and
if they are, are forged by someone other than yourself? Those posts?
 
"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:8i59pvkimohnuaj59i453ko9ohfb9jcojt@4ax.com...
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 00:57:44 GMT, "John Fortier"
jfortier@rochester.rr.com> wrote:



---
You pretend to be a benign, benevolent, facilitator, when what
you really are is a petty, bourgeois, dictator with such deep-seated
insecurities that you feel threatened whenever you're not in control of
a situation.
---
Since you have just demonstrated you ability to be lucid and able to use the
english language relatively well, why do you constantly descend to the use
of stupid, pointless insult and invective? It isn't even productive.

Actually, Jonny, I don't pretend to be a "benign, benevolent facilitator".
I do attempt to be reasonable and polite as long as that is possible, and,
unkile you, I don't descend to swearing and scatological excesses whenever
someone disagrees with me.

Benign - well, I don't go out of my way to hurt people
Benevolent - yes, I try to help people
facilitator - remains to be seen. Still have toget the new group up and
running.

Sorry Jonny, but "a petty, bourgeois, dictator with such deep-seated
insecurities that you feel threatened whenever you're not in control of a
situation." is a better description of your behaviour than mine. Describing
others in terms of your own behaviour seems to be a habit of yours.

However, you are without doubt a badly mannered, foul mouthed, bullying
individual, so asking the above of you is probably a futile exercise.

---
Unlike you, (so far) I can be badly mannered, foulmouthed, and abusive
when I choose to be, and I suspect that you'd also like to be if you
could get away with it. As a result of that I can present imagery which
you can't and which I can use to gain an advantage when I want one.
---
Oh, Jonny, Jonny, there's no advantage in being bad mannered, foul mouthed
and abusive. It just reveals you for what you are. You can't make your
arguments cogently, so you revert to type. The fact remains, that you are a
foul mouthed schoolyard bully who can't handle being stood up to. Pitiful,
really.

It is quite true to say that this newsgroup is moderated. As has been
pointed out before, it is moderated by you and your intolerant ilk. Your
bullying tactics are designed for one purpose alone; to convince you that
you are the most important individual in the newsgroup and that all
others
had better conform to your standards or face being denigrated.

---
Just because you say this newsgroup is moderated doesn't mean it is, and
your claims that it is are not based in fact, but rather because you
feel that this newsgroup isn't being "run" like it should be and if only
you were in control of it everything would be ever so much better. If
you'd stop pretending to know what I'm about and review my posting
history before opening your uninformed mouth you might find that my
"bullying tactics" are for the purpose of bringing down bullshit artists
and posers like you. I find that to be great fun, especially the part
where you take the bait and can't get loose.
Jonny, I do know what you're about. You're about putting down anyone who
has the nerve to stand up to your bullying. You have used your tactics for
far too long and tried to make this and other newsgroups conform to your
ideas of what is acceptable. It's not going to work any longer and
shouldn't have been allowed in the first place.

Such petulant hostility to the idea of a minimally moderated newsgroup
where, if you are accepted at all, you'll have to show a miniumum amount of
restraint and politeness. It sure is frightening, isn't it Jonny?
---

I have tried very hard to be civil to you and you have responded every
time
by being boorish and abusive. So, since this is, from now on, an
unmoderated newsgroup, hopefully free of your domineering smear tactics,
I
give you far warning; knock it off or get used to being constantly
corrected, having your faults pointed out in embarrassing detail and
being
held up to the ridicule you so richly deserve. And don't try your bully
tactics on me, sonny; I've dealt with better than you will ever be and
come
out ahead.

---
I'm sure it's quite a struggle for you to be civil, period, whenever
you're crossed. Probably stems from your stint in the Army where you
found yourself in a chain of command you could easily understand. Take
shit from your superiors and give shit to your inferiors won't work
here, though, since nobody's in charge. Scary, huh, Sarge?
Actually, if you want to address me by my final rank, it's Captain.

You really don't understand the army, or any military organisation, do you
Jonny. This is a pity since you could obviously benefit from some self
discipline. Those who dish out shit to those below them tend to have
remarkably short careers. And, quite frankly, you wouldn't last five
minutes.
I don't know where you got the idea that this was _ever_ a moderated
group, so all it'll be from now on is still unmoderated, and it's not
going to be free of _anything_ that was here before.
Jonny, you've been moderating it for far too long. You spoil it for others
because you think you have the "right" to do so or because it's "fun". One
of the reasons for a moderated group to succeed will be your absense.

As for the rest of
your pipe dream, you pathetic drunken wretch, you might as well resign
yourself to the fact that you can't win and you can't even break even,
so you better quit before you're you're forced to take a look at that
animal that lives in your skin and will leave here with its tail between
its legs
This silliness doesn't even warrant a reply.
Go away Fields, nobody needs you.

Maybe so, but nobody _wants_ you.

--
John Fields
You may not want me, Jonny, but it's nice to see that you actually realise
that nobody needs you.
 
"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:ac49pvgrnn4fvepouu4g2numsuj94s37rb@4ax.com...
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 01:14:41 GMT, "John Fortier"
jfortier@rochester.rr.com> wrote:


"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:7co8pvogk8cs2gqg6q5udr8731m4a1t5lq@4ax.com...
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 20:45:45 GMT, "John Fortier"
jfortier@rochester.rr.com> wrote:


That's Mr. Fortier to you, Fields.

---
I give the respect I get, Fartier.

--
John Fields

This is clever repartee?!

---
No, it's not, but I'm not surprised you had to ask, what with your also
having to ask John Larkin whom he was quoting when, clearly, he was
quoting himself.
Quoting himself! That's not quoting, that't just talking.
---

You know, the first time I got called that was in 4th grade.

---
Funny, I kind of had you figured out as having left the third grade
longer than two years ago.
Well, yes, I did, quite a lot longer than two years ago.

Sort of puts
Fields' level of discourse in perspective, doesn't it!

---
Of course. I have to limit my discourse severely in order to supply you
with concepts your crippled intellect can handle.
Why? If I have a crippled intellect, why not just overwhelm me with your
superior logic and your own immense intellect?
---

Jonny must try harder. 3/10

---
Well, I promise if he does I'll not
make it too difficult for him.
Nice to see that you've kept your promise. Calling me "fartier" has the
intelectual content of a discourse between moluscs.

John Fortier
 
"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message
news:3F94B8D4.576B@armory.com...
John Fortier wrote:

"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:ced5pv0l7mum7k3v48agqtlso13gk19h8k@4ax.com...
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 11:56:48 -0700, "Baphomet"
fandaDEATH2SPAMMERS@catskill.net> wrote:


As your posts on this topic are more likely to lead to a moderated
newsgroup
than less, I can only thank you for your "closeted" support :)

---
You're welcome!^)

Regardless of how I post, _this_ newsgroup won't be moderated, and I
could care less what Fortier does with any groups he chooses to start.

--
John Fields

That's Mr. Fortier to you, Fields.
----------------------
Not a bit, you shit-faced little needle-dick.

-Steve
This is the best you can do?
 
"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:1h85pvsal5s129s8urngf3tronumkc21ic@4ax.com...
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 03:21:13 GMT, "John Fortier"
jfortier@rochester.rr.com> wrote:


"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:t2g2pvs7s2db1r09r9b7vafu237amfskou@4ax.com...
On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 02:01:42 GMT, "John Fortier"
jfortier@rochester.rr.com> wrote:


PS darkmatter, don't bother replying, I'll ignore you and you won't
ever
know if you have managed to annoy me.

---
Can you say "hypocrite"?

If you're going to ignore someone (and you mean it) you can't write to
them to let them know that you're ignoring them!^)

--
John Fields

Why not? I already did. The ignoring is in affect from the time of
posting
^^^^^^
effect?
the message.

Try it, It's actually very satisfying!

---
Perhaps, if what you're trying to do is elicit further responses from
the ignoree...

Besides, if you read someone you're not really _ignoring_ them, you're
just not responding to their posts.

--
John Fields
The idea, Jonny, is to let them know you're not responding and thereby build
up their frustration.

You see, darkmatter can be safely ignored. It has no effect on me. You, on
the other hand, need to be told your fortune occasionally.

By the way, Jonny, does your boss know you use your work PC to post your
diatribes to the newsgroups?
 
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 07:22:49 -0700, "Baphomet"
<fandaDEATH2SPAMMERS@catskill.net> wrote:


You are truly a legend in your own mind John,
---
Gee, that's original...
---

even if in no one elses.
---
For a non-Neanderthal, your punctuation leaves something to be desired.
---

Are
your pathetic responses to both Fortier, myself and others what you consider
making it to difficult?
---
For a non-Neanderthal, the difference between 'to' and 'too' and the
proper use of either should be readily apparent.
---

Go work on your Claris templated website John. It is, much like your posts,
amature hour.
---
For a non-Neanderthal, the spelling of 'amateur' should come to mind
immediately. For a knuckle-dragger, probably not.
---

You are old enough to know that you only get one shot at
making a good first impression. Or are you just too anal retentive to pay a
designer to come up with a real website for your company?
---
No, just lazy.

I get plenty of work with everything just the way it is, thank you very
much. However, I've been thinking of updating it to include an s.e.d
page (like Jim Thomson's site) and a little more glitz, and if it ever
happens I'll be sure to let you know so you can get in on some cutting
edge 555 technology.

--
John Fields
 
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 07:25:00 -0700, "Baphomet"
<fandaDEATH2SPAMMERS@catskill.net> wrote:


Why does it always come down to doo doo ca ca name calling with people like
you, Dark Matter, and Fortier?
---
That's easy...

They calls 'em the way they sees 'em.


--
John Fields
 
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 07:27:59 -0700, "Baphomet"
<fandaDEATH2SPAMMERS@catskill.net> wrote:


Better three quality posts than the endless amount of baby dribble you
contribute.
---
If you really believed that you'd have to stop posting.

--
John Fields
 
On 21 Oct 2003 02:28:36 -0700, bill.sloman@ieee.org (Bill Sloman) wrote:


Keith, John Fields is a minor - if all too regular - contributor, and
his field of expertise - applications of the 555 - is not all that
demanding. Offending him is not difficult, and he generates so many
offensive postings that one is more or less obliged to take every
possible opportunity give him a dose of his own medicine.

That you can see him as a "core" contributor doesn't say anything good
about the quality of your perceptions. Or maybe your apples have worms
in their cores?
---
Sour grapes, Bill.

--
John Fields
 
"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:ac49pvgrnn4fvepouu4g2numsuj94s37rb@4ax.com...
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 01:14:41 GMT, "John Fortier"
jfortier@rochester.rr.com> wrote:


"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:7co8pvogk8cs2gqg6q5udr8731m4a1t5lq@4ax.com...
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 20:45:45 GMT, "John Fortier"
jfortier@rochester.rr.com> wrote:


That's Mr. Fortier to you, Fields.

---
I give the respect I get, Fartier.

--
John Fields

This is clever repartee?!

---
No, it's not, but I'm not surprised you had to ask, what with your also
having to ask John Larkin whom he was quoting when, clearly, he was
quoting himself.
---

You know, the first time I got called that was in 4th grade.

---
Funny, I kind of had you figured out as having left the third grade
longer than two years ago. Perhaps you spent more time there than most?
---

Sort of puts
Fields' level of discourse in perspective, doesn't it!

---
Of course. I have to limit my discourse severely in order to supply you
with concepts your crippled intellect can handle.
---

Jonny must try harder. 3/10

---
Well, he should if he wants to play, and I promise if he does I'll not
make it too difficult for him.
You are truly a legend in your own mind John, even if in no one elses. Are
your pathetic responses to both Fortier, myself and others what you consider
making it to difficult?

Go work on your Claris templated website John. It is, much like your posts,
amature hour. You are old enough to know that you only get one shot at
making a good first impression. Or are you just too anal retentive to pay a
designer to come up with a real website for your company?
 
"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message
news:3F94B8D4.576B@armory.com...
John Fortier wrote:

"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:ced5pv0l7mum7k3v48agqtlso13gk19h8k@4ax.com...
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 11:56:48 -0700, "Baphomet"
fandaDEATH2SPAMMERS@catskill.net> wrote:


As your posts on this topic are more likely to lead to a moderated
newsgroup
than less, I can only thank you for your "closeted" support :)

---
You're welcome!^)

Regardless of how I post, _this_ newsgroup won't be moderated, and I
could care less what Fortier does with any groups he chooses to start.

--
John Fields

That's Mr. Fortier to you, Fields.
----------------------
Not a bit, you shit-faced little needle-dick.
Why does it always come down to doo doo ca ca name calling with people like
you, Dark Matter, and Fortier?
 
"DarkMatter" <DarkMatter@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:aej9pvo8bekk3rausttvs8r67r7u77c98s@4ax.com...
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 11:56:48 -0700, "Baphomet"
fandaDEATH2SPAMMERS@catskill.net> Gave us:


"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:l3c5pvo724e2147jva8nv90h7sdofns0po@4ax.com...
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 08:32:25 -0700, "Baphomet"
fandaDEATH2SPAMMERS@catskill.net> wrote:


Now I just knew that if only we could all be sufficiently patient, you
(Dark
Matter) would and could rise to the occasion with a coherent answer
somewhere above the crude monosyllabic responses for which you have
become
infamous. Keep up the good work; there may yet be a place for you in
the
family homo erectus.

---
What the fuck is it with you two-faced assholes?

The guy does a good thing and instead of just acknowledging it you have
to throw shit into the game with your left-handed compliments and snide
slurs.

--
John Fields

As your posts on this topic are more likely to lead to a moderated
newsgroup
than less, I can only thank you for your "closeted" support :)

You're an idiot. Your "moderated group" will get three posts a
week, and this one will keep going along, just fine.

Bwuahahahahahahaha....
Better three quality posts than the endless amount of baby dribble you
contribute.
 
"DarkMatter" <DarkMatter@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:vbj9pvg0i6f0n2naren42ugsqnsa0e5g3h@4ax.com...
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 10:45:05 -0500, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> Gave us:

On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 08:32:25 -0700, "Baphomet"
fandaDEATH2SPAMMERS@catskill.net> wrote:


Now I just knew that if only we could all be sufficiently patient, you
(Dark
Matter) would and could rise to the occasion with a coherent answer
somewhere above the crude monosyllabic responses for which you have
become
infamous. Keep up the good work; there may yet be a place for you in the
family homo erectus.

---
What the fuck is it with you two-faced assholes?

The guy does a good thing and instead of just acknowledging it you have
to throw shit into the game with your left-handed compliments and snide
slurs.


Then, they wonder why I call them stupid.

In truth, they are stupid on *so many* levels.
You wouldn't recognize the truth if it bit you in the butt, and even if you
did, you wouldn't know how to handle it.
 
"DarkMatter" <DarkMatter@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:2ri9pvgdbq9m8ps36pd4sckh36174lnded@4ax.com...
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 04:59:38 GMT, "Ross Mac"
macroeng@example.invalid> Gave us:


Cute quote...but what does that have to do with the price of tea in
China.......nice try....whoever you are?......


As if you or anything that you say fucking matters... Jackass.
And this from the master of nothing that matters.
 
"DarkMatter" <DarkMatter@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:fji9pv8r52cds6dpetp6o6jlfa9rlhe4f4@4ax.com...
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 00:24:59 +0200, "Dimitrij Klingbeil"
dklingb@cs.tu-berlin.de> Gave us:

well, I had to read the post I'm referring to to
first understand it correctly.

The question is, did you read the post to the original twit that
accused me of looking my answer up on google?

If not, shut the fuck up.
Oh, you mean the posts that you don't make, aren't archived by Google, and
if they are, are forged by someone other than yourself? Those posts?
 
"DarkMatter" <DarkMatter@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:83kmovgr53sgbf46eeb2jj2critecse5m7@4ax.com...
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 14:28:45 -0700, "Baphomet"
fandaDEATH2SPAMMERS@catskill.net> Gave us:



And who would know better? :)

More proof that you have no clue about usenet.
The usual intellectual and pithy response we have all come to know and love
from the emotionally, culturally and spiritually arrested.
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top