C
Carlos E.R.
Guest
On 2023-04-29 05:59, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
It is a different contract, that works with their connected gadgets. You
share your data, you get data back. If you opt to not share, then you
also do not get real time data back. In a busy city it works pretty
well. In a village, not that well.
Depending on the particular gadget you buy, the contract is included or not.
But then, if there are few clients in the area, they don\'t have actual
time info for a road.
And mind, I was talking about the detour itself being OK, but the
joining back to the main road, which is a simple spot, is bad. This is
not just a question of timing cars, it is about having raw information
about the quality of a road and the crossings.
Then there is the case that many such detours may be marked in maps for
a speed limit of 90. When you get there, the actual limit is 30. Or it
is indeed 90, but it is full of potholes.
--
Cheers, Carlos.
On Saturday, April 29, 2023 at 9:03:14â¯AM UTC+10, Ricky wrote:
On Friday, April 28, 2023 at 1:30:27â¯PM UTC-4, Carlos E.R. wrote:
On 2023-04-28 16:27, Don Y wrote:
On 4/28/2023 5:18 AM, Carlos E.R. wrote:
That information would also be useful for gasoline cars. My country is
hilly, I would like to know the height profile of the proposed paths.
frown> I have found this, recently, *somewhere*. Though I can\'t
recall what I may have been looking for at the time.
That reminds me, that the TomTom never tells me to take a tunnel or
high pass. Says keep left or right instead (\"take the tunnel\" would be
way more useful). It has no information of the height I am at.
Yeah, navigation systems leave a lot to be desired. \"Local knowledge\"
is often keenly missing. They all tell me to head out \"the back way\"
for many of my destinations. But, the back way is (permanently) gated
shut -- as anyone who lives here would know.
The nav system in the car at least lets me add artificial \"keep outs\"
to prevent it from proposing those routes.
OTOH, there are times it tells me I am driving over \"grass\" because
it isn\'t aware of a new road or bridge, etc.
There is a parking lot near me, where it proposes a path right through
the wall of the basement, because it thinks I am at ground level.
I find the routes that say \"go through the traffic light, make a U-turn,
return to the light and then make a LEFT turn\" to be the most puzzling
(this, in stead of just turning RIGHT when you first approach the
intersection???)
Or going an intricate path in an unfamiliar city to find a \"turn left\"
(we drive on the right, remember ;-)) that is explicitly prohibited or
just impossible in the traffic.
I hate when it takes me on a \"TomTom detour\" that saves half a minute on
the map, just to find that I have to cross or join a very busy street,
which takes a minute or two to manage.
Strange. The navigators I use are measuring traffic times, so they take you on paths that don\'t have significant delays like this. When going to my hometown, I prefer to take a more back route. The navigator just looks at the trip times and usually wants me to go the main highway. But when the traffic is bad, it agrees with me and recommends the back route. I guess TomTom doesn\'t actually have real time data to work with. Try Google maps on your phone, or Waze.
Tom Tom does have real time data to work with. I think they get it by monitoring anonymised mobile phone locations as supplied by mobile phone networks. The last time I read the bumf, they talked about averaging one hour chunks over the busy parts of the day.
It is a different contract, that works with their connected gadgets. You
share your data, you get data back. If you opt to not share, then you
also do not get real time data back. In a busy city it works pretty
well. In a village, not that well.
Depending on the particular gadget you buy, the contract is included or not.
But then, if there are few clients in the area, they don\'t have actual
time info for a road.
And mind, I was talking about the detour itself being OK, but the
joining back to the main road, which is a simple spot, is bad. This is
not just a question of timing cars, it is about having raw information
about the quality of a road and the crossings.
Then there is the case that many such detours may be marked in maps for
a speed limit of 90. When you get there, the actual limit is 30. Or it
is indeed 90, but it is full of potholes.
--
Cheers, Carlos.