SA Greenies

[Petzl]

On Mon, 13 Feb 2017 22:05:51 +1100, Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au>
wrote:

**Don't tell Murtz that. He still doesn't accept the words of every
climatologist on the planet.

Not seen ANY government appointed State or Federal "protection" agency
as employable. All have heads stuffed with wool and a political
doctrine. Time to fire them.
Remember Scientist Tim Flannery who was going to wipe out life on
Earth with his proposal?
http://www.smh.com.au/news/global-warming/radical-climate-action-would-change-skys-colour/2008/05/19/1211182695948.html
https://is.gd/KIouqL
All the other Government employees are much the same, I have found all
are unemployable and cannot get real jobs. Look at Australia post? Yet
the nonsensical "CEO" (Ahmed Fahour) gets 6 million a year on a job
he can't get fired from and would not find employment in real world!

I think you will find that *any government employee* can be fired. This
has always been the case. The only variable is the degree of difficulty
associated with doing so. These days it is very easy.

In reality the fireing of Government "shiny arses" has never happened!
You can cite were I am wrong?
--
Petzl
"To Be A Politician You Need Three Things. Be a Good Liar, A Great Cheat
and a Brilliant Thief." Malcolm Turnbull

Its time for Malcolm to kick some arse....his own!!!

Australian MPs now among the highest paid in the world
http://www.news.com.au/national/australian-mps-now-among-the-highest-paid-in-the-world/story-fncynjr2-1226681596923
https://is.gd/nOyfr9

Turnbull draing the swamp!
http://cdn.newsapi.com.au/image/v1/cc61ccd180d35f931bae6ced5e4febaf?width=1024

ALWAYS Vote oligarchies Coalition, Labor, "Greens"
*LAST*, Federal State and Council!
Or you are voting for Islam and Sharia.

For Turnbull, ‘multi-faith’ only means Islam
https://is.gd/bunwYB

 

felix <me@nothere.invalid> live on stage:

the reason governments have to sell assets is because stupid voters keep
voting in Labor governments who run up massive debt

I guess you don't share the LNP's ideological free marketeering
privatisation mania.
Yet your voting preferences help keep returning them to power.

Oh, well. I would not expect from your ilk any deeper kind of
understanding of left politics, nor possessing an intact logical
reasoning ability.

--
Ördög (Your scary shadow that says "Booo" in the dark)

 

[Trevor Wilson]

On 13/02/2017 9:40 PM, Petzl wrote:

On Mon, 13 Feb 2017 20:00:39 +1100, Trevor Wilson
trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote:

On 13/02/2017 7:41 PM, Xeno wrote:
On 13/02/2017 6:34 PM, Je?us wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2017 18:27:23 +1100, Clifford Heath
no.spam@please.net> wrote:

On 13/02/17 13:44, Je?us wrote:
On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 12:09:38 +1100, Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote:

On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 11:24:48 +1100, Jeßus <j@j.net> wrote:

On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 10:00:01 +1100, Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote:


Repairs to Basslink cable were happenining and the hydro dams were
getting loow. But the survived

That Basslink cable is one of the dumbest ideas ever. Personally
speaking, I'd like to see it chopped up into a thousand pieces and
forgotten about. Tasmania would be, on the whole, far better off
without it.

Well tasmania needs 100Mw generator without it.
Latest tech Wind Generation could do this?
http://reneweconomy.com.au/super-conductor-turbines-could-slash-australian-wind-energy-costs-84828/

https://is.gd/sbtNM1

Tasmania is perfectly capable of generating more power than it needs
with just hydro and wind alone,

That was true before they had a ten-year drought.

It was true before, during and after the 'drought'. The problem is/was
that the water is poorly managed.

It's very hard to *manage water* when it doesn't fall from the sky and
fill the dams. The drought in Tasmania was unprecedented. Even the
easterly wind rains that fed the entire Midlands area failed and rivers
dried up. The Macquarie River being one such notable river - it just
disappeared. That 10 year drought will not be the last. Worse droughts
are to come.


**Don't tell Murtz that. He still doesn't accept the words of every
climatologist on the planet.

Not seen ANY government appointed State or Federal "protection" agency
as employable. All have heads stuffed with wool and a political
doctrine. Time to fire them.
Remember Scientist Tim Flannery who was going to wipe out life on
Earth with his proposal?
http://www.smh.com.au/news/global-warming/radical-climate-action-would-change-skys-colour/2008/05/19/1211182695948.html
https://is.gd/KIouqL
All the other Government employees are much the same, I have found all
are unemployable and cannot get real jobs. Look at Australia post? Yet
the nonsensical "CEO" (Ahmed Fahour) gets 6 million a year on a job
he can't get fired from and would not find employment in real world!

**You are so wrong, in every single way possible.

--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au

 

[F Murtz]

Trevor Wilson wrote:

On 13/02/2017 9:40 PM, Petzl wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2017 20:00:39 +1100, Trevor Wilson
trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote:

On 13/02/2017 7:41 PM, Xeno wrote:
On 13/02/2017 6:34 PM, Je?us wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2017 18:27:23 +1100, Clifford Heath
no.spam@please.net> wrote:

On 13/02/17 13:44, Je?us wrote:
On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 12:09:38 +1100, Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote:

On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 11:24:48 +1100, Jeßus <j@j.net> wrote:

On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 10:00:01 +1100, Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com
wrote:


Repairs to Basslink cable were happenining and the hydro dams
were
getting loow. But the survived

That Basslink cable is one of the dumbest ideas ever. Personally
speaking, I'd like to see it chopped up into a thousand pieces and
forgotten about. Tasmania would be, on the whole, far better off
without it.

Well tasmania needs 100Mw generator without it.
Latest tech Wind Generation could do this?
http://reneweconomy.com.au/super-conductor-turbines-could-slash-australian-wind-energy-costs-84828/


https://is.gd/sbtNM1

Tasmania is perfectly capable of generating more power than it needs
with just hydro and wind alone,

That was true before they had a ten-year drought.

It was true before, during and after the 'drought'. The problem is/was
that the water is poorly managed.

It's very hard to *manage water* when it doesn't fall from the sky and
fill the dams. The drought in Tasmania was unprecedented. Even the
easterly wind rains that fed the entire Midlands area failed and rivers
dried up. The Macquarie River being one such notable river - it just
disappeared. That 10 year drought will not be the last. Worse droughts
are to come.


**Don't tell Murtz that. He still doesn't accept the words of every
climatologist on the planet.

Especially the ones that deliberately make false reports

Not seen ANY government appointed State or Federal "protection" agency
as employable. All have heads stuffed with wool and a political
doctrine. Time to fire them.
Remember Scientist Tim Flannery who was going to wipe out life on
Earth with his proposal?
http://www.smh.com.au/news/global-warming/radical-climate-action-would-change-skys-colour/2008/05/19/1211182695948.html

https://is.gd/KIouqL
All the other Government employees are much the same, I have found all
are unemployable and cannot get real jobs. Look at Australia post? Yet
the nonsensical "CEO" (Ahmed Fahour) gets 6 million a year on a job
he can't get fired from and would not find employment in real world!


**You are so wrong, in every single way possible.

 

[F Murtz]

Clifford Heath wrote:

On 13/02/17 13:44, Je�us wrote:
On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 12:09:38 +1100, Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote:

On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 11:24:48 +1100, Jeßus <j@j.net> wrote:

On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 10:00:01 +1100, Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote:


Repairs to Basslink cable were happenining and the hydro dams were
getting loow. But the survived

That Basslink cable is one of the dumbest ideas ever. Personally
speaking, I'd like to see it chopped up into a thousand pieces and
forgotten about. Tasmania would be, on the whole, far better off
without it.

Well tasmania needs 100Mw generator without it.
Latest tech Wind Generation could do this?
http://reneweconomy.com.au/super-conductor-turbines-could-slash-australian-wind-energy-costs-84828/

https://is.gd/sbtNM1

Tasmania is perfectly capable of generating more power than it needs
with just hydro and wind alone,

That was true before they had a ten-year drought.

It was all the fault of the liberals and AGW that the liberals and
non greens caused

 

[Trevor Wilson]

On 14/02/2017 11:46 AM, F Murtz wrote:

Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 13/02/2017 9:40 PM, Petzl wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2017 20:00:39 +1100, Trevor Wilson
trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote:

On 13/02/2017 7:41 PM, Xeno wrote:
On 13/02/2017 6:34 PM, Je?us wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2017 18:27:23 +1100, Clifford Heath
no.spam@please.net> wrote:

On 13/02/17 13:44, Je?us wrote:
On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 12:09:38 +1100, Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote:

On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 11:24:48 +1100, Jeßus <j@j.net> wrote:

On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 10:00:01 +1100, Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com
wrote:


Repairs to Basslink cable were happenining and the hydro dams
were
getting loow. But the survived

That Basslink cable is one of the dumbest ideas ever. Personally
speaking, I'd like to see it chopped up into a thousand pieces
and
forgotten about. Tasmania would be, on the whole, far better off
without it.

Well tasmania needs 100Mw generator without it.
Latest tech Wind Generation could do this?
http://reneweconomy.com.au/super-conductor-turbines-could-slash-australian-wind-energy-costs-84828/



https://is.gd/sbtNM1

Tasmania is perfectly capable of generating more power than it
needs
with just hydro and wind alone,

That was true before they had a ten-year drought.

It was true before, during and after the 'drought'. The problem
is/was
that the water is poorly managed.

It's very hard to *manage water* when it doesn't fall from the sky and
fill the dams. The drought in Tasmania was unprecedented. Even the
easterly wind rains that fed the entire Midlands area failed and
rivers
dried up. The Macquarie River being one such notable river - it just
disappeared. That 10 year drought will not be the last. Worse droughts
are to come.


**Don't tell Murtz that. He still doesn't accept the words of every
climatologist on the planet.

Especially the ones that deliberately make false reports

**Name the ones who have allegedly made false reports. Cite the fake
report.

Not seen ANY government appointed State or Federal "protection" agency
as employable. All have heads stuffed with wool and a political
doctrine. Time to fire them.
Remember Scientist Tim Flannery who was going to wipe out life on
Earth with his proposal?
http://www.smh.com.au/news/global-warming/radical-climate-action-would-change-skys-colour/2008/05/19/1211182695948.html


https://is.gd/KIouqL
All the other Government employees are much the same, I have found all
are unemployable and cannot get real jobs. Look at Australia post? Yet
the nonsensical "CEO" (Ahmed Fahour) gets 6 million a year on a job
he can't get fired from and would not find employment in real world!


**You are so wrong, in every single way possible.

--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au

 

[Trevor Wilson]

On 14/02/2017 11:53 AM, F Murtz wrote:

Clifford Heath wrote:
On 13/02/17 13:44, Je�us wrote:
On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 12:09:38 +1100, Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote:

On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 11:24:48 +1100, Jeßus <j@j.net> wrote:

On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 10:00:01 +1100, Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote:


Repairs to Basslink cable were happenining and the hydro dams were
getting loow. But the survived

That Basslink cable is one of the dumbest ideas ever. Personally
speaking, I'd like to see it chopped up into a thousand pieces and
forgotten about. Tasmania would be, on the whole, far better off
without it.

Well tasmania needs 100Mw generator without it.
Latest tech Wind Generation could do this?
http://reneweconomy.com.au/super-conductor-turbines-could-slash-australian-wind-energy-costs-84828/


https://is.gd/sbtNM1

Tasmania is perfectly capable of generating more power than it needs
with just hydro and wind alone,

That was true before they had a ten-year drought.

It was all the fault of the liberals and AGW that the liberals and
non greens caused

**Idiot. AGW has caused the drought in Tasmania. A fault in the Basslink
cable caused the other part of the problem. It could be said that,
perhaps, Tasmania should consider another back-up system, should both
problems occur again.

--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au

 

[Xeno]

On 14/02/2017 11:59 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote:

On 14/02/2017 11:53 AM, F Murtz wrote:
Clifford Heath wrote:
On 13/02/17 13:44, Je�us wrote:
On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 12:09:38 +1100, Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote:

On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 11:24:48 +1100, Jeßus <j@j.net> wrote:

On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 10:00:01 +1100, Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote:


Repairs to Basslink cable were happenining and the hydro dams were
getting loow. But the survived

That Basslink cable is one of the dumbest ideas ever. Personally
speaking, I'd like to see it chopped up into a thousand pieces and
forgotten about. Tasmania would be, on the whole, far better off
without it.

Well tasmania needs 100Mw generator without it.
Latest tech Wind Generation could do this?
http://reneweconomy.com.au/super-conductor-turbines-could-slash-australian-wind-energy-costs-84828/



https://is.gd/sbtNM1

Tasmania is perfectly capable of generating more power than it needs
with just hydro and wind alone,

That was true before they had a ten-year drought.

It was all the fault of the liberals and AGW that the liberals and
non greens caused

**Idiot. AGW has caused the drought in Tasmania. A fault in the Basslink
cable caused the other part of the problem. It could be said that,
perhaps, Tasmania should consider another back-up system, should both
problems occur again.

Wind generators on the west coast would be the most likely source. The
west coast is the most consistently windy part of the state due to the
Roaring Forties which blast onto the coast there. I used to work on the
west coast of Tasmania some 4 decades ago and the most consistent
features of life there was the incessant rain and the equally incessant
wind. They measure rainfall over there in metres.

--

Xeno

First they ignore you,
Then they ridicule you,
Then they fight you,
Then you win.

Mahatma Ghandi

 

[Trevor Wilson]

On 14/02/2017 12:24 PM, Xeno wrote:

On 14/02/2017 11:59 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 14/02/2017 11:53 AM, F Murtz wrote:
Clifford Heath wrote:
On 13/02/17 13:44, Je�us wrote:
On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 12:09:38 +1100, Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote:

On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 11:24:48 +1100, Jeßus <j@j.net> wrote:

On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 10:00:01 +1100, Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote:


Repairs to Basslink cable were happenining and the hydro dams were
getting loow. But the survived

That Basslink cable is one of the dumbest ideas ever. Personally
speaking, I'd like to see it chopped up into a thousand pieces and
forgotten about. Tasmania would be, on the whole, far better off
without it.

Well tasmania needs 100Mw generator without it.
Latest tech Wind Generation could do this?
http://reneweconomy.com.au/super-conductor-turbines-could-slash-australian-wind-energy-costs-84828/




https://is.gd/sbtNM1

Tasmania is perfectly capable of generating more power than it needs
with just hydro and wind alone,

That was true before they had a ten-year drought.

It was all the fault of the liberals and AGW that the liberals and
non greens caused

**Idiot. AGW has caused the drought in Tasmania. A fault in the Basslink
cable caused the other part of the problem. It could be said that,
perhaps, Tasmania should consider another back-up system, should both
problems occur again.

Wind generators on the west coast would be the most likely source. The
west coast is the most consistently windy part of the state due to the
Roaring Forties which blast onto the coast there. I used to work on the
west coast of Tasmania some 4 decades ago and the most consistent
features of life there was the incessant rain and the equally incessant
wind. They measure rainfall over there in metres.

**That would be unacceptable to Murtz. He has a pathological and
irrational hatred of any form of renewable energy system.

--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au

 

[SG1]

"Fran Snortilus" <ask@itsahoot.com> wrote in message
news7u6j8$67k$1@dont-email.me...

On 14/02/2017 1:27 PM, SG1 wrote:


Especially the ones that deliberately make false reports

**Name the ones who have allegedly made false reports. Cite the fake
report.


Recently (last 2 years) the BoM has been caught fudging figures.


**Cite.

Whatever you cite, I will take up with my partner. She works for BoM.
I can assure you that she is under strict instructions to publish
facts only. As are all BoM employees.


This from a quick search.
http://joannenova.com.au/2014/08/the-heat-is-on-bureau-of-meteorology-altering-climate-figures-the-australian/

I see that she quotes Jennifer Marohasy! former well known IPA skeptic.
Nuff said.

I also worked for bom for nearly 30 years.

So did you fudge figures or are you claiming that the BOM does?
I did work in National Climate Centre for a while.

I heard about it on the news at the time. I make no claim as to the bom
fudging figures, but some
organisations claim otherwise. There is an article in the Oz that maybe
Pretzel can read for us. Oh
and not change the content hahaha.

 

[SG1]

"Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message
news:egf39iFblnpU2@mid.individual.net...

On 14/02/2017 11:46 AM, F Murtz wrote:
Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 13/02/2017 9:40 PM, Petzl wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2017 20:00:39 +1100, Trevor Wilson
trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote:

On 13/02/2017 7:41 PM, Xeno wrote:
On 13/02/2017 6:34 PM, Je?us wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2017 18:27:23 +1100, Clifford Heath
no.spam@please.net> wrote:

On 13/02/17 13:44, Je?us wrote:
On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 12:09:38 +1100, Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com
wrote:

On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 11:24:48 +1100, Jeßus <j@j.net> wrote:

On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 10:00:01 +1100, Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com
wrote:


Repairs to Basslink cable were happenining and the hydro dams
were
getting loow. But the survived

That Basslink cable is one of the dumbest ideas ever. Personally
speaking, I'd like to see it chopped up into a thousand pieces
and
forgotten about. Tasmania would be, on the whole, far better off
without it.

Well tasmania needs 100Mw generator without it.
Latest tech Wind Generation could do this?
http://reneweconomy.com.au/super-conductor-turbines-could-slash-australian-wind-energy-costs-84828/



https://is.gd/sbtNM1

Tasmania is perfectly capable of generating more power than it
needs
with just hydro and wind alone,

That was true before they had a ten-year drought.

It was true before, during and after the 'drought'. The problem
is/was
that the water is poorly managed.

It's very hard to *manage water* when it doesn't fall from the sky
and
fill the dams. The drought in Tasmania was unprecedented. Even the
easterly wind rains that fed the entire Midlands area failed and
rivers
dried up. The Macquarie River being one such notable river - it just
disappeared. That 10 year drought will not be the last. Worse
droughts
are to come.


**Don't tell Murtz that. He still doesn't accept the words of every
climatologist on the planet.

Especially the ones that deliberately make false reports

**Name the ones who have allegedly made false reports. Cite the fake
report.

Recently (last 2 years) the BoM has been caught fudging figures.

Not seen ANY government appointed State or Federal "protection" agency
as employable. All have heads stuffed with wool and a political
doctrine. Time to fire them.
Remember Scientist Tim Flannery who was going to wipe out life on
Earth with his proposal?
http://www.smh.com.au/news/global-warming/radical-climate-action-would-change-skys-colour/2008/05/19/1211182695948.html


https://is.gd/KIouqL
All the other Government employees are much the same, I have found all
are unemployable and cannot get real jobs. Look at Australia post? Yet
the nonsensical "CEO" (Ahmed Fahour) gets 6 million a year on a job
he can't get fired from and would not find employment in real world!


**You are so wrong, in every single way possible.




--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au

 

[Trevor Wilson]

On 14/02/2017 12:54 PM, SG1 wrote:

"Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message
news:egf39iFblnpU2@mid.individual.net...
On 14/02/2017 11:46 AM, F Murtz wrote:
Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 13/02/2017 9:40 PM, Petzl wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2017 20:00:39 +1100, Trevor Wilson
trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote:

On 13/02/2017 7:41 PM, Xeno wrote:
On 13/02/2017 6:34 PM, Je?us wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2017 18:27:23 +1100, Clifford Heath
no.spam@please.net> wrote:

On 13/02/17 13:44, Je?us wrote:
On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 12:09:38 +1100, Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com
wrote:

On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 11:24:48 +1100, Jeßus <j@j.net> wrote:

On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 10:00:01 +1100, Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com
wrote:


Repairs to Basslink cable were happenining and the hydro dams
were
getting loow. But the survived

That Basslink cable is one of the dumbest ideas ever.
Personally
speaking, I'd like to see it chopped up into a thousand pieces
and
forgotten about. Tasmania would be, on the whole, far better
off
without it.

Well tasmania needs 100Mw generator without it.
Latest tech Wind Generation could do this?
http://reneweconomy.com.au/super-conductor-turbines-could-slash-australian-wind-energy-costs-84828/




https://is.gd/sbtNM1

Tasmania is perfectly capable of generating more power than it
needs
with just hydro and wind alone,

That was true before they had a ten-year drought.

It was true before, during and after the 'drought'. The problem
is/was
that the water is poorly managed.

It's very hard to *manage water* when it doesn't fall from the
sky and
fill the dams. The drought in Tasmania was unprecedented. Even the
easterly wind rains that fed the entire Midlands area failed and
rivers
dried up. The Macquarie River being one such notable river - it just
disappeared. That 10 year drought will not be the last. Worse
droughts
are to come.


**Don't tell Murtz that. He still doesn't accept the words of every
climatologist on the planet.

Especially the ones that deliberately make false reports

**Name the ones who have allegedly made false reports. Cite the fake
report.


Recently (last 2 years) the BoM has been caught fudging figures.

**Cite.

Whatever you cite, I will take up with my partner. She works for BoM. I
can assure you that she is under strict instructions to publish facts
only. As are all BoM employees.


--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au

 

[Petzl]

On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 16:57:42 +1100, Fran Snortilus <ask@itsahoot.com>
wrote:

On 14/02/2017 11:46 AM, F Murtz wrote:
Trevor Wilson wrote:


**Don't tell Murtz that. He still doesn't accept the words of every
climatologist on the planet.

Especially the ones that deliberately make false reports

Name one or give a cite.

http://jennifermarohasy.com/about/
Jennifer Marohasy brought the BoM figuring into question
This story
http://jennifermarohasy.com/2015/09/you-dont-know-the-half-of-it-temperature-adjustments-and-the-australian-bureau-of-meteorology/
https://is.gd/WEBj8n
--
Petzl
Don't be "sheep to the slaughter"
ALWAYS Vote oligarchies Coalition, Labor, "Greens"
*LAST*, Federal State and Council!
Or you are voting for Islam and Sharia.

For Turnbull, ‘multi-faith’ only means Islam
https://is.gd/bunwYB

 

[Petzl]

On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 16:11:50 +1000, "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> wrote:

This from a quick search.
http://joannenova.com.au/2014/08/the-heat-is-on-bureau-of-meteorology-altering-climate-figures-the-australian/

I see that she quotes Jennifer Marohasy! former well known IPA skeptic.
Nuff said.

I also worked for bom for nearly 30 years.

So did you fudge figures or are you claiming that the BOM does?
I did work in National Climate Centre for a while.

I heard about it on the news at the time. I make no claim as to the bom
fudging figures, but some
organisations claim otherwise. There is an article in the Oz that maybe
Pretzel can read for us. Oh
and not change the content hahaha.

http://jennifermarohasy.com/about/
Jennifer Marohasy brought the BoM figuring into question
This story
http://jennifermarohasy.com/2015/09/you-dont-know-the-half-of-it-temperature-adjustments-and-the-australian-bureau-of-meteorology/
https://is.gd/WEBj8n
--
Petzl
Don't be "sheep to the slaughter"
ALWAYS Vote oligarchies Coalition, Labor, "Greens"
*LAST*, Federal State and Council!
Or you are voting for Islam and Sharia.

For Turnbull, ‘multi-faith’ only means Islam
https://is.gd/bunwYB

 

[Fran Snortilus]

On 14/02/2017 1:27 PM, SG1 wrote:

"Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message
news:egf6lrFc7t9U1@mid.individual.net...
On 14/02/2017 12:54 PM, SG1 wrote:

"Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message
news:egf39iFblnpU2@mid.individual.net...
On 14/02/2017 11:46 AM, F Murtz wrote:
Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 13/02/2017 9:40 PM, Petzl wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2017 20:00:39 +1100, Trevor Wilson
trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote:

On 13/02/2017 7:41 PM, Xeno wrote:
On 13/02/2017 6:34 PM, Je?us wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2017 18:27:23 +1100, Clifford Heath
no.spam@please.net> wrote:

On 13/02/17 13:44, Je?us wrote:
On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 12:09:38 +1100, Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com
wrote:

On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 11:24:48 +1100, Jeßus <j@j.net> wrote:

On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 10:00:01 +1100, Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com
wrote:


Repairs to Basslink cable were happenining and the hydro
dams
were
getting loow. But the survived

That Basslink cable is one of the dumbest ideas ever.
Personally
speaking, I'd like to see it chopped up into a thousand
pieces
and
forgotten about. Tasmania would be, on the whole, far better
off
without it.

Well tasmania needs 100Mw generator without it.
Latest tech Wind Generation could do this?
http://reneweconomy.com.au/super-conductor-turbines-could-slash-australian-wind-energy-costs-84828/





https://is.gd/sbtNM1

Tasmania is perfectly capable of generating more power than it
needs
with just hydro and wind alone,

That was true before they had a ten-year drought.

It was true before, during and after the 'drought'. The problem
is/was
that the water is poorly managed.

It's very hard to *manage water* when it doesn't fall from the
sky and
fill the dams. The drought in Tasmania was unprecedented. Even the
easterly wind rains that fed the entire Midlands area failed and
rivers
dried up. The Macquarie River being one such notable river - it
just
disappeared. That 10 year drought will not be the last. Worse
droughts
are to come.


**Don't tell Murtz that. He still doesn't accept the words of every
climatologist on the planet.

Especially the ones that deliberately make false reports

**Name the ones who have allegedly made false reports. Cite the fake
report.


Recently (last 2 years) the BoM has been caught fudging figures.


**Cite.

Whatever you cite, I will take up with my partner. She works for BoM.
I can assure you that she is under strict instructions to publish
facts only. As are all BoM employees.


This from a quick search.
http://joannenova.com.au/2014/08/the-heat-is-on-bureau-of-meteorology-altering-climate-figures-the-australian/

I see that she quotes Jennifer Marohasy! former well known IPA skeptic.
Nuff said.

> I also worked for bom for nearly 30 years.

So did you fudge figures or are you claiming that the BOM does?

 

[Fran Snortilus]

On 14/02/2017 12:54 PM, SG1 wrote:

"Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message

**Name the ones who have allegedly made false reports. Cite the fake
report.


Recently (last 2 years) the BoM has been caught fudging figures.

Cite?

 

[Fran Snortilus]

On 14/02/2017 11:58 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote:

On 14/02/2017 11:46 AM, F Murtz wrote:
Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 13/02/2017 9:40 PM, Petzl wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2017 20:00:39 +1100, Trevor Wilson
trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote:

On 13/02/2017 7:41 PM, Xeno wrote:
On 13/02/2017 6:34 PM, Je?us wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2017 18:27:23 +1100, Clifford Heath
no.spam@please.net> wrote:

On 13/02/17 13:44, Je?us wrote:
On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 12:09:38 +1100, Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com
wrote:

On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 11:24:48 +1100, Jeßus <j@j.net> wrote:

On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 10:00:01 +1100, Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com
wrote:


Repairs to Basslink cable were happenining and the hydro dams
were
getting loow. But the survived

That Basslink cable is one of the dumbest ideas ever. Personally
speaking, I'd like to see it chopped up into a thousand pieces
and
forgotten about. Tasmania would be, on the whole, far better off
without it.

Well tasmania needs 100Mw generator without it.
Latest tech Wind Generation could do this?
http://reneweconomy.com.au/super-conductor-turbines-could-slash-australian-wind-energy-costs-84828/




https://is.gd/sbtNM1

Tasmania is perfectly capable of generating more power than it
needs
with just hydro and wind alone,

That was true before they had a ten-year drought.

It was true before, during and after the 'drought'. The problem
is/was
that the water is poorly managed.

It's very hard to *manage water* when it doesn't fall from the sky
and
fill the dams. The drought in Tasmania was unprecedented. Even the
easterly wind rains that fed the entire Midlands area failed and
rivers
dried up. The Macquarie River being one such notable river - it just
disappeared. That 10 year drought will not be the last. Worse
droughts
are to come.


**Don't tell Murtz that. He still doesn't accept the words of every
climatologist on the planet.

Especially the ones that deliberately make false reports

**Name the ones who have allegedly made false reports. Cite the fake
report.

We both asked the same thing. ) If only I'd waited till I read the
very next post.........

 

[Fran Snortilus]

On 14/02/2017 11:46 AM, F Murtz wrote:

Trevor Wilson wrote:

**Don't tell Murtz that. He still doesn't accept the words of every
climatologist on the planet.

Especially the ones that deliberately make false reports

Name one or give a cite.

 

[Petzl]

On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:15:34 +1000, "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> wrote:

This from a quick search.
http://joannenova.com.au/2014/08/the-heat-is-on-bureau-of-meteorology-altering-climate-figures-the-australian/


I also worked for bom for nearly 30 years.

**Then I don't need to tell you about the integrity of the staff and the
data presented.

JoNova is full of shit BTW. She has zero integrity and zero honesty. Her
site has been debunked and called on it's accuracy many, many times. I am
stunned that you would present lies as fact. Do you work for Donald Trump?

As I have never heard of that person, she was the first in the search.
http://r.duckduckgo.com/l/?kh=-1&uddg=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theaustralian.com.au%2Fnational-affairs%2Fclimate%2Fbureau-of-meteorology-altering-climate-figures%2Fnews-story%2F5bccf49433ae80f23b332d3493437106

as I don't subscribe to the Oz I don't know what this one says but it
appears to make the accusation.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/climate/bureau-of-meteorology-altering-climate-figures/news-story/5bccf49433ae80f23b332d3493437106
https://is.gd/P3WwHq
THE Bureau of Meteorology has been accused of manipulating historic
temperature records to fit a predetermined view of global warming.

Researcher Jennifer Marohasy claims the adjusted records resemble
“propaganda” rather than science.

Dr Marohasy has analysed the raw data from dozens of locations across
Australia and matched it against the new data used by BOM showing that
temperatures were progressively warming.

In many cases, Dr Marohasy said, temperature trends had changed from
slight cooling to dramatic warming over 100 years.

--
Petzl
--
Petzl
what Australians think about the allegations of torture of suspected terrorists
'If hooking up one rag-head terrorist's testicles to a car battery gets the truth out of the lying little camel shagger to save just one Australian soldiers life,
then I have only three things to say;
Red is positive, Black is negative and make sure his nuts are wet!

 

[SG1]

"Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message
news:egfc1uFd4qiU1@mid.individual.net...

On 14/02/2017 1:27 PM, SG1 wrote:

"Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message
news:egf6lrFc7t9U1@mid.individual.net...
On 14/02/2017 12:54 PM, SG1 wrote:

"Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message
news:egf39iFblnpU2@mid.individual.net...
On 14/02/2017 11:46 AM, F Murtz wrote:
Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 13/02/2017 9:40 PM, Petzl wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2017 20:00:39 +1100, Trevor Wilson
trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote:

On 13/02/2017 7:41 PM, Xeno wrote:
On 13/02/2017 6:34 PM, Je?us wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2017 18:27:23 +1100, Clifford Heath
no.spam@please.net> wrote:

On 13/02/17 13:44, Je?us wrote:
On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 12:09:38 +1100, Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com
wrote:

On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 11:24:48 +1100, Jeßus <j@j.net> wrote:

On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 10:00:01 +1100, Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com
wrote:


Repairs to Basslink cable were happenining and the hydro
dams
were
getting loow. But the survived

That Basslink cable is one of the dumbest ideas ever.
Personally
speaking, I'd like to see it chopped up into a thousand
pieces
and
forgotten about. Tasmania would be, on the whole, far better
off
without it.

Well tasmania needs 100Mw generator without it.
Latest tech Wind Generation could do this?
http://reneweconomy.com.au/super-conductor-turbines-could-slash-australian-wind-energy-costs-84828/





https://is.gd/sbtNM1

Tasmania is perfectly capable of generating more power than it
needs
with just hydro and wind alone,

That was true before they had a ten-year drought.

It was true before, during and after the 'drought'. The problem
is/was
that the water is poorly managed.

It's very hard to *manage water* when it doesn't fall from the
sky and
fill the dams. The drought in Tasmania was unprecedented. Even
the
easterly wind rains that fed the entire Midlands area failed and
rivers
dried up. The Macquarie River being one such notable river - it
just
disappeared. That 10 year drought will not be the last. Worse
droughts
are to come.


**Don't tell Murtz that. He still doesn't accept the words of
every
climatologist on the planet.

Especially the ones that deliberately make false reports

**Name the ones who have allegedly made false reports. Cite the fake
report.


Recently (last 2 years) the BoM has been caught fudging figures.


**Cite.

Whatever you cite, I will take up with my partner. She works for BoM.
I can assure you that she is under strict instructions to publish
facts only. As are all BoM employees.


This from a quick search.
http://joannenova.com.au/2014/08/the-heat-is-on-bureau-of-meteorology-altering-climate-figures-the-australian/


I also worked for bom for nearly 30 years.

**Then I don't need to tell you about the integrity of the staff and the
data presented.

JoNova is full of shit BTW. She has zero integrity and zero honesty. Her
site has been debunked and called on it's accuracy many, many times. I am
stunned that you would present lies as fact. Do you work for Donald Trump?

As I have never heard of that person, she was the first in the search.
http://r.duckduckgo.com/l/?kh=-1&uddg=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theaustralian.com.au%2Fnational-affairs%2Fclimate%2Fbureau-of-meteorology-altering-climate-figures%2Fnews-story%2F5bccf49433ae80f23b332d3493437106

as I don't subscribe to the Oz I don't know what this one says but it
appears to make the accusation.

--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au