PRC as a amplifier in GPS question.

On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:27:09 +1000, Tom <tom@no.spam.invalid> wrote:

who where wrote:
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:06:17 +1000, Tom <tom@no.spam.invalid> wrote:

If it's only for rare use why not use sunlight.

I presume that means you've had success with that method. We've tried
it on the odd occasion over the years (Perth) and found nary a bit
nuked after a week out in the sun. YMMV but I wouldn't be wasting my
time trying it again.

Was that direct sunlight or through the window?
Direct, out in the (sunny) summer weather.
 
On Nov 20, 3:48 pm, "Mickel" <mic...@nospam.com> wrote:
"What The" <n...@none.com> wrote in message

news:8_7Mm.55236$ze1.3010@news-server.bigpond.net.au...

Anyone in Sydney have one of these kicking around. Need to erase some old
27C512 chips (so it doesn't need to be huge) and don't feel like paying
$25 out of china along with the 1 week wait for something that i imagine
may be collecting dust on your bookcase.

Use that big bright ball in the sky, it's free even if it is a bit slow.

Michael

20+ years ago I just bought the germicidal UV tube, a ballast and
starter and interlock switch (all scavenged from the junk box) and
built an enclosure for it for safety.


The toothbrush sterilizer idea is probably more cost efficient though.
 
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:54:12 +1100, Sylvia Else wrote:


But that doesn't answer the question of how.
Friction, then chemical, and maybe a bit of adhesion.
 
On Dec 6, 9:05 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
John-Melb wrote:
UNSNIP

 > 2. The carriage of concealed arms for the purposes of self defence
 > should be allowed, where a person has undergone appropriate training
 > and can show a genuine requirement for such arms.

What would you see as a genuine need? I'd see a need if you are actively
involved in the drug trade, if you are in a bikie gang, if you have
upset a bikie gang, or if you live in Melbourne and your name is Moran.

If someone is going be authorised to carry a concealed firearm, then the
training should be to the same standard as the police (or at least the
standard that the police should be held to), including target
identification and marksmanship, and subject to annual re-qualification.
Also some limitation on the type of weapon carried.

Whats anti-gun about that?
Why do you see the need to somehow associate drug dealers and bikie
gangs with licenced firearms ownership? Does it somehow make you feel
morally superior?
 
On Nov 28, 5:29 pm, Bob Larter <bobbylar...@gmail.com> wrote:
keithr wrote:
Jeßus wrote:
In article <7muumpF3jjpp...@mid.individual.net>,
dynasoar..REMOVE..THI...@ozdebate.com said...
:
:John-Melb wrote:
:> On Nov 23, 6:37 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
:
:>> And who are these "Anti-gun idiots"?
:
:> Let's see now,
:
:> The description includes those who don't have an issue with anti-gun
:> zealots posting their claptrap on other groups, but who go feral when
:> an alternative viewpoint appears in the same forum.
:
:> Remind you of anyone?
:
:> How is Dorothy, by the way?
:
:For Christ sake, John, put a sock in it!  Or at least copy and paste
a new :diatribe.
:
:You keep on about this over and over and over again.  Your paranoia
is :increasing daily.
:
:I, for one, object to any gun postings, for or against, by you or
Wilson or :anyone else in aus.electronics and have made that known
before.
:
:Go and beat up a prisoner or something, it may help you overcome your
:eek:bsessions.

This guy is a screw? Look at the poor judgment he shows on Usenet -
and this same guy is in charge of prisoners?

So rumour has it.

That's scary. Never thought I'd feel sorry for prisoners.

Which one's do you feel sorry for Bob, the murderers, the armed
robbers, the rapists, the drug dealers or the child molesters?
--
    W
  . | ,. w ,   "Some people are alive only because
   \|/  \|/     it is illegal to kill them."    Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
 
On Dec 13, 12:07 pm, "Allan" <some...@nowhere.com> wrote:
Why did you cross post your Message to aus.electronics group??
No electronics in this reply?
Two reasons
I was awaiting a reply from Keithr, and this is where he hangs out.

An experiment, Trivial Trevor regularly posts his anti-gun and anti-
gunowner rants on aus.electronics, and no-one complains, as soon as
any alternative viewpoint goes up, a small select group on
aus.electronics go absolutely feral.

You're sooking about what I posted, have you ever taken up the
repeated posting of anti-gun diatribe on the same group with the
poster?

Why is that?
"John-Melb" <mcnamara_j...@hotmail.com> wrote in message

news:4ec29cdf-4178-4cff-993f-4555fe6b5b5c@f18g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On Dec 6, 9:05 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:





John-Melb wrote:
UNSNIP

2. The carriage of concealed arms for the purposes of self defence
should be allowed, where a person has undergone appropriate training
and can show a genuine requirement for such arms.

What would you see as a genuine need? I'd see a need if you are actively
involved in the drug trade, if you are in a bikie gang, if you have
upset a bikie gang, or if you live in Melbourne and your name is Moran.

If someone is going be authorised to carry a concealed firearm, then the
training should be to the same standard as the police (or at least the
standard that the police should be held to), including target
identification and marksmanship, and subject to annual re-qualification..
Also some limitation on the type of weapon carried.

Whats anti-gun about that?

Why do you see the need to somehow associate drug dealers and bikie
gangs with licenced firearms ownership? Does it somehow make you feel
morally superior?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
 
On Dec 14, 8:45 pm, John-Melb <mcnamara_j...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Dec 14, 6:00 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:> Allan wrote:
Why did you cross post your Message to aus.electronics group??
No electronics in this reply?

John does it to play the arsehole. His (flimsy) excuse is that there is
a poster who sometimes expresses opinions contrary to john's there and
the other posters there have the temerity not to take him to task for
it. There is an opinion expressed by some other gun owners that john is
an agent provocateur for the anti gun lobby by trying to make gun owners
look bad.

Tell us again how no-one took Trevor (aus.electronics long standing
and highly respected poster) to task for posting his anti-gun diatribe
on aus.electronics, but when feral when alternative viewpoint
appeared. How is Dorothy by the way?





"John-Melb" <mcnamara_j...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4ec29cdf-4178-4cff-993f-4555fe6b5b5c@f18g2000prf.googlegroups.com....
On Dec 6, 9:05 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
John-Melb wrote:
UNSNIP

2. The carriage of concealed arms for the purposes of self defence
should be allowed, where a person has undergone appropriate training
and can show a genuine requirement for such arms.

What would you see as a genuine need? I'd see a need if you are actively
involved in the drug trade, if you are in a bikie gang, if you have
upset a bikie gang, or if you live in Melbourne and your name is Moran.

If someone is going be authorised to carry a concealed firearm, then the
training should be to the same standard as the police (or at least the
standard that the police should be held to), including target
identification and marksmanship, and subject to annual re-qualification.
Also some limitation on the type of weapon carried.

Whats anti-gun about that?

Why do you see the need to somehow associate drug dealers and bikie
gangs with licenced firearms ownership? Does it somehow make you feel
morally superior?

Nope, I don't associate them at all, I was just giving examples of
people who really do need a gun for self defence, legal or not. As
against those who feel that it would be nice to have one.- Hide quoted text -

Yes you did, I mentioned legal carry, and you started ranting about
drug dealers and bikie gangs, why, what association is there between
licenced gun owners and drug dealers in your mind?



- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
 
On Dec 19, 11:26 pm, ".." <sustainable.future...@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear All,

As you know global warming is endangering the future of life on the
planet. It will also affect us;
rising sea levels, dwindling water supplies, mass deaths due to heat
waves, stoppage of the gulfstream, which
brings milder climate to north of Europe, super hurricanes, less food
due to droughts are some of the effects.

As you also know global warming is produced due to CO2 emissions
coming from burning of fossil fuels.
Fortunately this has been shown to be false, so no need to panic about
it.
Dont be the last one to find this out, you will just look like a
moron.


So what
can every single person do to reduce global warming ?

Absolutely nothing. No way on earth you can stop a natural process.
You can however stop promoting rubbish like carbon pollution,
man made global warming etc, and by this alone you can do your bit to
stop bottom feeders (gore and other politicians for example) profiting
from it - stealing directly out of you and your family's pocket and
your future.

If you still want to believe in AGW, then feel free to spend this
money on your own ways to reduce energy consumption. That is your
right. Dont dare FORCE others to do the same.

I do agree however that saving energy is a good idea, there are many
easy and cheap way to do so, if you can do more for less it saves
money and that allows you to potentially have a higher amount of funds
to spend on other things, or save, invest.


1) Insulation: Do you know that you can save 50% of heating energy
(and money) by insulation ? Especially in
the times the financial crisis, you can make the insulation cheaper
and save the money when oil, natural gas and
coal prices are higher due to higher demand. What needs to be
insulated ? Firstly the Roof, since warmer air
goes up, then the windows (tripple glass or at least dual glass and
shutters for additional insulation at night,
and in summer time), then the outer walls. Also small cracks, leaks in
weatherstrips etc should be eliminated.
An infrared inspection of your house for heat losses would be the best
way to find out what else can be done.
A wintergarden will help heating your house additionally in winter
time.
Depending on climate it is a good idea.

2) Using rechargable batteries instead of alkaline batteries, and
charge them during less demand ours like at night
will also save a lot of energy and money.
Remember that some rechargeables are 1.2v VS 1.5v, this may be a
problem
with some equipment.

I have had success with these newer 2000MAH AA L Ion cells, when
used with the proper charger.
They don't last for as many charges as they claim, but even if they
last for 50 or so is a worthwhile saving of money.

Running things directly off mains power rather than battery will be
more efficient (if possible).

3) Lightning; the use of Compact fluorescent lamps instead of
traditioanl light bulbs will save 80% of energy, the
use of very new LED lamps will save even more.

Straight 2" and 4" fluro tubes ( that have been used for decades)
(better still the new T5 Fluorescent fittings, and/or triphosphor
tubes) use even less power than CFL and give more USABLE light.
Retrofitting with electronic ballasts can save a few watts of power
(and heat).

A lot of what is said about CFL's is false and they are not the
universal answer (though they are good in some cases). Please read
this technical article on the matter.

http://sound.westhost.com/articles/incandescent.htm

4) Buying local. Most of the energy is spent for transportation of
imported goods, especially food. By buying local
made food you not only save a lot of energy, but also create more jobs
at home.

Very little is made locally (if you are referring to western
countries). Food I agree with if the quality is there and the price is
value for money.

One case where you should NOT buy locally is western made cars
compared to asian imports (japan etc).
Western cars in my experience generally have worse build quality,
outdated design and technology, higher price, less efficiency, lower
life, lower resale values than most Japanese (and even korean) brands.
This is bad for all of us, and "the environment".

5) Heating; there are several way to save energy and money by changing
the heating method; you can use the free heat
of the nature by adding a solar thermal equipment to heat the water
for taking showers and also to heat your home.
Additionally you can use a heating pump, which funtions like a reverse
fridge; it takes the heat of the outside and
transfers it to your home. You use much much less energy to do this
(electricity to pump a liquid).

Heat pump is indeed the most efficient way to provide heat from
electricity that I am aware of.

6) Your car; by buying a hybrid car you save 30% of fuel, by
converting your car to CNG (compressed natural gas) you
can save a lot of CO2, since CNG has much less carbon but more
hydrogen, which will result in water (CH4 instead of
C8H18). CNG will also result in much more energy output per mass. The
conversion is not very expensive. It is totally
save, since the storage has to resist a certain pressure.
Since its now widely known that carbon pollution is a hoax, the amount
of carbon emitted
doesn't matter anymore.

Hybrids cost much more to buy over equivalent normal cars, the extra
cost is much more than the likely fuel savings over the life. The
batteries used are a shocking pollutant, don't usually have a long
life, and high cost.
Buying a very efficient normal car is a much better way to save fuel
and cost in my opinion.

Of course there are also other smaller things you have to consider:
- Each 60 pounds increases fuel consumption by 10%.

- Aggressive driving (speeding, rapid acceleration, and hard braking)
wastes gas. It can lower your highway gas mileage
33% and city mileage 5%.
It can, dont know the exact figures though.

- Drive at lowest and constant rpms; 2000 rpm are enough; you can save
up to 30%. Even a Porsche can be driven at the
4th gear at 20 mph and at the 6th gear at 50 mph with 2.5 times less
fuel consumption.

- Avoid high speeds. Driving 75 mph, rather than 65 mph, could cut
your fuel economy by 15%.
In practice with modern cars in my experience it makes no noticeable
difference
Around here you are more likely to cause an accident, aggravation or
be a victim of road rage
if you were to try doing that on a main road.

- Use air conditioning only when necessary
Car Air conditioning uses less fuel than the aerodynamic drag caused
by open windows, especially in modern
cars where aerodynamics are an extremely important part of the design
to improve fuel efficiency.

If you are driving slowly the aerodynamic losses will be less, but you
probably wont be getting much airflow either. If its in traffic, the
outside air will be hot, probably full of exhaust fumes, in this case
using aircon with vents closed is probably whats needed.

- Keep tires properly inflated and aligned to improve your gasoline
mileage by around 3.3%.
It does help, also makes them last longer and grip better.

- Replace clogged air filters to improve gas mileage by as much as 10%
and protect your engine
true - dont know exact figures though

- Combine errands into one trip. Several short trips, each one taken
from a cold start, can use twice as much fuel as
one trip covering the same distance when the engine is warm. Do not
forget that in the first mile your car uses 8
times more fuel, in the second mile 4 times and only after the
fourth mile it becomes normal
Dont know about the figures accuracy, but stuff like repeated short
trips isn't good for the engine, it should
be regularly driven for long enough (20-30 min) to heat up the oil
enough to burn off the crap that accumulates
in it if it doesn't get warm. This crap becomes acidic and damages
your engine if not burnt off. Same with exhaust systems I have found
that if they regularly get hot enough, it gets rid of the condensation
etc that causes corrosion.

Repeated short trips probably increase damage via metal fatigue from
the metal expanding and contracting many times where on a long trip,
this will only happen at start up and when stopped.

7) Buying A++ or A+++ equipments. The extra money you pay for this
will be back in 1-2 years. It will save a lot of CO2.

??????????


8) Try to save also energy at your job; you can do it by insulation,
more efficient processes, heat recovery, more
efficient pumps/engines, low temperature processses, material
saving, water savings, optimization, automatic turning
off of unnecessary energy using processes, control if some
processes are really necessary (the change of some
processes makes other processes sometimes unnecesarry on which
nobody has thought about).

9) Solar cells for your own home; at the moment solar cells are very
cheap since there is an overproduction. These cells
can operate a fridge for example.

They arent here, even though there are subsidies


> Regards.
 
"kreed" wrote...
One case where you should NOT buy locally is western made cars
compared to asian imports (japan etc).
Western cars in my experience generally have worse build quality,
outdated design and technology, higher price, less efficiency, lower
life, lower resale values than most Japanese (and even korean) brands.
Rubbish, the best cars in the world are made by German companies.
They have the highest build quality in the world and they always lead
automotive
technology in all areas -e.g. Porsche, BMW, Mercedes, Audi etc.
 
On Dec 20, 8:44 pm, "fritz" <yapu...@microsoft.com> wrote:
"kreed" wrote...

One case where you should NOT buy locally is western made cars
compared to asian imports (japan etc).
Western cars in my experience generally have worse build quality,
outdated design and technology, higher price, less efficiency, lower
life, lower resale values than most Japanese (and even korean) brands.

Rubbish, the best cars in the world are made by German companies.
They have the highest build quality in the world and they always lead
automotive
technology in all areas -e.g. Porsche, BMW, Mercedes, Audi etc.

I don't dispute that - but they are European, not western.

On the downside brands like you mention are beyond the reach of most
people though, and are not an option for the majority of the
population.

The entry level and lower priced Mercedes are not made in Germany now
either. Not saying that they are necessarily bad quality as I havent
owned one.

I don't know if the other companies you mentioned make lower price
models for the mainstream market here. In my experience, Japanese made
cars provide the best build quality in the lower priced market where
the majority of buyers are.
 
kreed wrote:
On Dec 20, 8:44 pm, "fritz"<yapu...@microsoft.com> wrote:
"kreed" wrote...

One case where you should NOT buy locally is western made cars
compared to asian imports (japan etc).
Western cars in my experience generally have worse build quality,
outdated design and technology, higher price, less efficiency, lower
life, lower resale values than most Japanese (and even korean) brands.

Rubbish, the best cars in the world are made by German companies.
They have the highest build quality in the world and they always lead
automotive
technology in all areas -e.g. Porsche, BMW, Mercedes, Audi etc.


I don't dispute that - but they are European, not western.

On the downside brands like you mention are beyond the reach of most
people though, and are not an option for the majority of the
population.

The entry level and lower priced Mercedes are not made in Germany now
either. Not saying that they are necessarily bad quality as I havent
owned one.

I don't know if the other companies you mentioned make lower price
models for the mainstream market here. In my experience, Japanese made
cars provide the best build quality in the lower priced market where
the majority of buyers are.



the japs make one of the very top luxury cars in the world but next to
no one has heard of it and nearly impossible to buy.(toyota century)
 
fritz wrote:
"kreed" wrote...

One case where you should NOT buy locally is western made cars
compared to asian imports (japan etc).
Western cars in my experience generally have worse build quality,
outdated design and technology, higher price, less efficiency, lower
life, lower resale values than most Japanese (and even korean)
brands.

Rubbish, the best cars in the world are made by German companies.
And so are some of the worst.
Even ownend an Opel?

Dave.

--
---------------------------------------------
Check out my Electronics Engineering Video Blog & Podcast:
http://www.eevblog.com
 
"fritz" <yaputya@microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:hgkv7b$c66$02$1@news.t-online.com...
"kreed" wrote...

One case where you should NOT buy locally is western made cars
compared to asian imports (japan etc).
Western cars in my experience generally have worse build quality,
outdated design and technology, higher price, less efficiency, lower
life, lower resale values than most Japanese (and even korean) brands.

Rubbish, the best cars in the world are made by German companies.
They have the highest build quality in the world and they always lead
automotive
technology in all areas -e.g. Porsche, BMW, Mercedes, Audi etc.
**Clearly you have never owned a Japanese car. They are vastly more reliable
than any of the European brands. Including Mercs. In fact, one of my clients
owns a C Class Benz. It has been back to Mercedes 37 (THIRTY SEVEN) times
for under warranty faults. He asked for a replacement and Merc refused.


--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au
 
fritz wrote:
"kreed" wrote...
One case where you should NOT buy locally is western made cars
compared to asian imports (japan etc).
Western cars in my experience generally have worse build quality,
outdated design and technology, higher price, less efficiency, lower
life, lower resale values than most Japanese (and even korean) brands.

Rubbish, the best cars in the world are made by German companies.
They have the highest build quality in the world and they always lead
automotive
technology in all areas -e.g. Porsche, BMW, Mercedes, Audi etc.
When it comes to reliability, German cars are worse all the major
Japanese makes, and worse than Kia!

http://www.caradvice.com.au/1436/top-10-reliable-brands/

"Other manufacturers which performed relatively poorly in the list include

* Porsche (27.48%)
* BMW (28.64)
* Mercedes (29.90%)
* Audi (36.74%)
* Land Rover (44.21%)
* Jeep (46.35 %)"
 
kreed wrote:
On Dec 21, 12:33 am, F Murtz<hagg...@hotmail.com> wrote:
kreed wrote:
On Dec 20, 8:44 pm, "fritz"<yapu...@microsoft.com> wrote:
"kreed" wrote...

One case where you should NOT buy locally is western made cars
compared to asian imports (japan etc).
Western cars in my experience generally have worse build quality,
outdated design and technology, higher price, less efficiency, lower
life, lower resale values than most Japanese (and even korean) brands.

Rubbish, the best cars in the world are made by German companies.
They have the highest build quality in the world and they always lead
automotive
technology in all areas -e.g. Porsche, BMW, Mercedes, Audi etc.

I don't dispute that - but they are European, not western.

On the downside brands like you mention are beyond the reach of most
people though, and are not an option for the majority of the
population.

The entry level and lower priced Mercedes are not made in Germany now
either. Not saying that they are necessarily bad quality as I havent
owned one.

I don't know if the other companies you mentioned make lower price
models for the mainstream market here. In my experience, Japanese made
cars provide the best build quality in the lower priced market where
the majority of buyers are.

the japs make one of the very top luxury cars in the world but next to
no one has heard of it and nearly impossible to buy.(toyota century)

I havent heard of it either.
I always assumed that the luxury cars toyota made were under the
"Lexus" name.

Look it up in wikipedia, it has a V12 engine.
 
On Dec 21, 8:31 am, "Trevor Wilson" <tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au>
wrote:
"fritz" <yapu...@microsoft.com> wrote in message

news:hgkv7b$c66$02$1@news.t-online.com...



"kreed" wrote...

One case where you should NOT buy locally is western made cars
compared to asian imports (japan etc).
Western cars in my experience generally have worse build quality,
outdated design and technology, higher price, less efficiency, lower
life, lower resale values than most Japanese (and even korean) brands.

Rubbish, the best cars in the world are made by German companies.
They have the highest build quality in the world and they always lead
automotive
technology in all areas -e.g. Porsche, BMW, Mercedes, Audi etc.

**Clearly you have never owned a Japanese car. They are vastly more reliable
than any of the European brands. Including Mercs.
That is my experience too. Have had 2 Mitsubishi, and a Toyota (japan
made) and they just kept going for many years and are extremely well
priced for what you get.

The best example was our 1991 Express work van, bought new and got
over 600,000 km out of it before it wasn't viable to repair with. I
did have the engine rebuilt, and put in a reconditioned exchange
gearbox from wreckers at around 300,000k, but a friend did it for a
reasonable price.

To my amazement I have seen the thing STILL getting round as one of
those "wicked" backpacker hire vans.

Locally made cars or locally assembled japan brand cars have been poor
quality, and I would never buy again.


In fact, one of my clients
owns a C Class Benz. It has been back to Mercedes 37 (THIRTY SEVEN) times
for under warranty faults. He asked for a replacement and Merc refused.

--
Trevor Wilsonwww.rageaudio.com.au

Is this particular model made in Germany or elsewhere ?

A good friend of mine who is a Merc enthusiast told me a few years
back that all but the top end models are now made outside Germany
(South Africa, Korea, US depending on where they are to be exported
to IIRC).

He has also mentioned similar stories to what you say about your
client's Merc troubles.
 
On Dec 21, 12:33 am, F Murtz <hagg...@hotmail.com> wrote:
kreed wrote:
On Dec 20, 8:44 pm, "fritz"<yapu...@microsoft.com> wrote:
"kreed" wrote...

One case where you should NOT buy locally is western made cars
compared to asian imports (japan etc).
Western cars in my experience generally have worse build quality,
outdated design and technology, higher price, less efficiency, lower
life, lower resale values than most Japanese (and even korean) brands.

Rubbish, the best cars in the world are made by German companies.
They have the highest build quality in the world and they always lead
automotive
technology in all areas -e.g. Porsche, BMW, Mercedes, Audi etc.

I don't dispute that - but they are European, not western.

On the downside brands like you mention are beyond the reach of most
people though, and are not an option for the majority of the
population.

The entry level and lower priced Mercedes are not made in Germany now
either. Not saying that they are necessarily bad quality as I havent
owned one.

I don't know if the other companies you mentioned make lower price
models for the mainstream market here. In my experience, Japanese made
cars provide the best build quality in the lower priced market where
the majority of buyers are.

the japs make one of the very top luxury cars in the world but next to
no one has heard of it and nearly impossible to buy.(toyota century)
I havent heard of it either.
I always assumed that the luxury cars toyota made were under the
"Lexus" name.
 
Trevor Wilson wrote:
"fritz" <yaputya@microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:hgkv7b$c66$02$1@news.t-online.com...

"kreed" wrote...

One case where you should NOT buy locally is western made cars
compared to asian imports (japan etc).
Western cars in my experience generally have worse build quality,
outdated design and technology, higher price, less efficiency, lower
life, lower resale values than most Japanese (and even korean)
brands.

Rubbish, the best cars in the world are made by German companies.
They have the highest build quality in the world and they always lead
automotive
technology in all areas -e.g. Porsche, BMW, Mercedes, Audi etc.

**Clearly you have never owned a Japanese car. They are vastly more
reliable than any of the European brands.
Yup.
I had a Mazda 626 that did over 300,000km with hardly any trouble at all,
incredibly reliable, and never got professionally serviced, I just changed
the consumables myself whenever I got around to it. Worst problem ever was
the alternator going.
My current Opel has done only half that and it's constantly in the shop and
has broken down completely on many occasions. I think I've had half the bits
under the bonnet replaced. Has always leaked coolant like there's no
tomorrow (been in 4 times for coolant leaks alone). And I've had it dealer
serviced since new.
German cars are built like a brick out-house though, very solid, but the
reliability is abysmal.

Dave.

--
================================================
Check out my Electronics Engineering Video Blog & Podcast:
http://www.eevblog.com
 
"kreed" <kenreed1999@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:cf26eaa1-6a60-4622-b4c3-e56741467ef3@b36g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On Dec 21, 8:31 am, "Trevor Wilson" <tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au
wrote:
"fritz" <yapu...@microsoft.com> wrote in message

news:hgkv7b$c66$02$1@news.t-online.com...



"kreed" wrote...

One case where you should NOT buy locally is western made cars
compared to asian imports (japan etc).
Western cars in my experience generally have worse build quality,
outdated design and technology, higher price, less efficiency, lower
life, lower resale values than most Japanese (and even korean) brands.

Rubbish, the best cars in the world are made by German companies.
They have the highest build quality in the world and they always lead
automotive
technology in all areas -e.g. Porsche, BMW, Mercedes, Audi etc.

**Clearly you have never owned a Japanese car. They are vastly more
reliable
than any of the European brands. Including Mercs.

That is my experience too. Have had 2 Mitsubishi, and a Toyota (japan
made) and they just kept going for many years and are extremely well
priced for what you get.

The best example was our 1991 Express work van, bought new and got
over 600,000 km out of it before it wasn't viable to repair with. I
did have the engine rebuilt, and put in a reconditioned exchange
gearbox from wreckers at around 300,000k, but a friend did it for a
reasonable price.

To my amazement I have seen the thing STILL getting round as one of
those "wicked" backpacker hire vans.

Locally made cars or locally assembled japan brand cars have been poor
quality, and I would never buy again.
**Fair enough. I've been lucky. We have a 1989 Telstar in the family. Since
new, the only problem has been a squeaky water pump.

In fact, one of my clients
owns a C Class Benz. It has been back to Mercedes 37 (THIRTY SEVEN) times
for under warranty faults. He asked for a replacement and Merc refused.

--
Trevor Wilsonwww.rageaudio.com.au


Is this particular model made in Germany or elsewhere ?
**South Afrika. Ironically, the guy also owns a Golf. It was also made in
South Afrika. It has been perfectly reliable. He won't be buying a Benz
again.

A good friend of mine who is a Merc enthusiast told me a few years
back that all but the top end models are now made outside Germany
(South Africa, Korea, US depending on where they are to be exported
to IIRC).
**True enough. A mate has a 3 year old 500SL. It has been reasonably
reliable, but is Hellishly expensive to service.

He has also mentioned similar stories to what you say about your
client's Merc troubles.
**Clearly Merc could copy VW's expertise in setting up overseas operations.


--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au
 
F Murtz wrote:
kreed wrote:
On Dec 21, 12:33 am, F Murtz<hagg...@hotmail.com> wrote:
kreed wrote:
On Dec 20, 8:44 pm, "fritz"<yapu...@microsoft.com> wrote:
"kreed" wrote...

One case where you should NOT buy locally is western made cars
compared to asian imports (japan etc).
Western cars in my experience generally have worse build quality,
outdated design and technology, higher price, less efficiency, lower
life, lower resale values than most Japanese (and even korean)
brands.

Rubbish, the best cars in the world are made by German companies.
They have the highest build quality in the world and they always lead
automotive
technology in all areas -e.g. Porsche, BMW, Mercedes, Audi etc.

I don't dispute that - but they are European, not western.

On the downside brands like you mention are beyond the reach of most
people though, and are not an option for the majority of the
population.

The entry level and lower priced Mercedes are not made in Germany now
either. Not saying that they are necessarily bad quality as I havent
owned one.

I don't know if the other companies you mentioned make lower price
models for the mainstream market here. In my experience, Japanese made
cars provide the best build quality in the lower priced market where
the majority of buyers are.

the japs make one of the very top luxury cars in the world but next to
no one has heard of it and nearly impossible to buy.(toyota century)

I havent heard of it either.
I always assumed that the luxury cars toyota made were under the
"Lexus" name.

Look it up in wikipedia, it has a V12 engine.
It looks like the car that the chairman of Fujitsu used to turn up at
the factory in, when I was over there in the '80s
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top