PRC as a amplifier in GPS question.

[Dyna Soar]

John-Melb wrote:

"Dyna Soar" wrote:
John-Melb wrote:
"Dyna Soar" wrote:
John-Melb wrote:
"Dyna Soar" wrote:
Go and beat up a prisoner or something, it may help you overcome
your obsessions.
Fuck you, and fuck the horse you rode in on too!
Strike a nerve, did I?
I think your comment was more illustrative of you than of me

Yeah, you're right about that. It was childish and I apologise.

Fuck you, and fuck the horse you rode in on too!

I suppose I shouldn't expect anything else from a paranoiac, obsessed
dickhead like you.
Whatever you think, though, my apology still stands. You don't want to
accept it? Fine.


--
Dyna

All rights reserved. All wrongs avenged.

 

[Dyna Soar]

John-Melb wrote:

mcnamara_j...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Dyna Soar"wrote:
John-Melb wrote:
"Dyna Soar" wrote:
John-Melb wrote:
"Dyna Soar" wrote:

Go and beat up a prisoner or something, it may help you overcome
your obsessions.
Fuck you, and fuck the horse you rode in on too!
Strike a nerve, did I?
I think your comment was more illustrative of you than of me

Yeah, you're right about that. It was childish and I apologise.

Fuck you, and fuck the horse you rode in on too!

Forgot to add, since my line of work is somehow relevant to this
discussion (according to you) when it comes to sarcasm, you really
shouldn't try it on someone in my line of work.

Are you threatening me? I'd be careful about that if I were you...


--
Dyna

All rights reserved. All wrongs avenged.

 

[Dyna Soar]

John-Melb wrote:

"Dyna Soar" wrote:
John-Melb wrote:
mcnamara_j...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Dyna Soar"wrote:
John-Melb wrote:
"Dyna Soar" wrote:
John-Melb wrote:
"Dyna Soar" wrote:

Go and beat up a prisoner or something, it may help you
overcome your obsessions.
Fuck you, and fuck the horse you rode in on too!
Strike a nerve, did I?
I think your comment was more illustrative of you than of me
Yeah, you're right about that. It was childish and I apologise.
Fuck you, and fuck the horse you rode in on too!
Forgot to add, since my line of work is somehow relevant to this
discussion (according to you) when it comes to sarcasm, you really
shouldn't try it on someone in my line of work.

Are you threatening me? I'd be careful about that if I were you...

Grow up dick-head, how many times a day do I use or see sarcasm in my
line of work.

If that's the case, you don't handle it too well, do you!
Which is all further proof of your paranoia.


--
Dyna

All rights reserved. All wrongs avenged.

 

[John-Melb]

On Nov 23, 9:29 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:

John-Melb wrote:
On Nov 23, 7:16 pm, "Dyna  Soar"
dynasoar..REMOVE..THI...@ozdebate.com> wrote:

For Christ sake, John, put a sock in it!  Or at least copy and paste a new
diatribe.

You keep on about this over and over and over again.  Your paranoia is
increasing daily.

I, for one, object to any gun postings, for or against, by you or Wilson or
anyone else in aus.electronics and have made that known before.

I found a number of Wilson's anti-gun and anti-gun owner rants on
aus.electronics.

Not one other poster told him his posts were off topic, not one other
poster told him to take it to where people were interested, not one
other poster criticised his O/T anti-gun rants in any way.

Not true john, nobody objected to your replies, it was when you started
threads just to attack trevor that the objections were made. You brought
that one on yourself

No one objected to Trevor's O/t rants, only mine, funny about that.

As soon as I started providing alternative viewpoint, I started
copping flack. I even had "Keefy" questioning my sexual preferences.

Toughen up princess, if you can't take the heat, stop whining and stay
off the net

You're the one whining about where I post

Go and beat up a prisoner or something, it may help you overcome your
obsessions.

Fuck you, and fuck the horse you rode in on too!

Hmm, didn't know you were into bestiality, quite an admission

No, I only screw within my species

 

[John-Melb]

On Nov 23, 9:03 pm, "Dyna Soar"
<dynasoar..REMOVE..THI...@ozdebate.com> wrote:

John-Melb wrote:
 "Dyna  Soar" wrote:
John-Melb wrote:
"Dyna Soar" wrote:
Go and beat up a prisoner or something, it may help you overcome
your obsessions.
Fuck you, and fuck the horse you rode in on too!
Strike a nerve, did I?
I think your comment was more illustrative of you than of me

Yeah, you're right about that.  It was childish and I apologise.

Fuck you, and fuck the horse you rode in on too!

--
Dyna

All rights reserved. All wrongs avenged.

 

[Dyna Soar]

John-Melb wrote:

On Nov 23, 10:24 pm, "Dyna Soar"
dynasoar..REMOVE..THI...@ozdebate.com> wrote:

If that's the case, you don't handle it too well, do you!
Which is all further proof of your paranoia.

Yet another example of some irrelevant "anti" believing he can
diagnose, let me guess, you went to the same med school as Keefy.

"anti"? Anti what?

As has been explained to you ad nauseam, one doesn't need to be medically
trained to observe your paranoia.

--
Dyna

All rights reserved. All wrongs avenged.

 

[John-Melb]

On Nov 23, 9:42 pm, John-Melb <mcnamara_j...@hotmail.com> wrote:

On Nov 23, 9:03 pm, "Dyna  Soar"

dynasoar..REMOVE..THI...@ozdebate.com> wrote:
John-Melb wrote:
 "Dyna  Soar" wrote:
John-Melb wrote:
"Dyna Soar" wrote:
Go and beat up a prisoner or something, it may help you overcome
your obsessions.
Fuck you, and fuck the horse you rode in on too!
Strike a nerve, did I?
I think your comment was more illustrative of you than of me

Yeah, you're right about that.  It was childish and I apologise.

Fuck you, and fuck the horse you rode in on too!

Forgot to add, since my line of work is somehow relevant to this
discussion (according to you) when it comes to sarcasm, you really
shouldn't try it on someone in my line of work.

--
Dyna

All rights reserved. All wrongs avenged.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

 

[John-Melb]

On Nov 23, 9:59 pm, "Dyna Soar"
<dynasoar..REMOVE..THI...@ozdebate.com> wrote:

I suppose I shouldn't expect anything else from a paranoiac, obsessed
dickhead like you.

Gee thanks, coming from you, that's a compliment.

Whatever you think, though, my apology still stands.  You don't want to
accept it?  Fine.

Bullshit

 

[John-Melb]

On Nov 23, 10:03 pm, "Dyna Soar"
<dynasoar..REMOVE..THI...@ozdebate.com> wrote:

John-Melb wrote:
 <mcnamara_j...@hotmail.com> wrote:
 Dyna Soar"wrote:
John-Melb wrote:
"Dyna Soar" wrote:
John-Melb wrote:
"Dyna Soar" wrote:
Go and beat up a prisoner or something, it may help you overcome
your obsessions.
Fuck you, and fuck the horse you rode in on too!
Strike a nerve, did I?
I think your comment was more illustrative of you than of me
Yeah, you're right about that. It was childish and I apologise.
Fuck you, and fuck the horse you rode in on too!
Forgot to add, since my line of work is somehow relevant to this
discussion (according to you) when it comes to sarcasm, you really
shouldn't try it on someone in my line of work.

Are you threatening me?  I'd be careful about that if I were you...

Grow up dick-head, how many times a day do I use or see sarcasm in my
line of work.

--
Dyna

All rights reserved. All wrongs avenged.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

 

[John-Melb]

On Nov 23, 10:24 pm, "Dyna Soar"
<dynasoar..REMOVE..THI...@ozdebate.com> wrote:

If that's the case, you don't handle it too well, do you!
Which is all further proof of your paranoia.

Yet another example of some irrelevant "anti" believing he can
diagnose, let me guess, you went to the same med school as Keefy.

 

[John-Melb]

On Nov 23, 10:54 pm, "Dyna Soar"
<dynasoar..REMOVE..THI...@ozdebate.com> wrote:

John-Melb wrote:
On Nov 23, 10:24 pm, "Dyna  Soar"
dynasoar..REMOVE..THI...@ozdebate.com> wrote:
If that's the case, you don't handle it too well, do you!
Which is all further proof of your paranoia.
Yet another example of some irrelevant "anti" believing he can
diagnose, let me guess, you went to the same med school as Keefy.

"anti"?  Anti what?

As has been explained to you ad nauseam, one doesn't need to be medically
trained to observe your paranoia.

Then why is it, that those who are medically trained have never

observed or commented on it?

--
Dyna

All rights reserved. All wrongs avenged.

 

[Phil Allison]

"Stupider than Anyone Else on Earth "

Trevor Wilson wrote:

My electrician says it's not an issue, but I can't see why.

Any thoughts?

**Not an issue, due to the MEN system used in AUSTRALIA. Cross-posting to
an international group will guarantee a bunch of useless comments. Pay
attention to Australian posters only.

Your electrician is correct.


From the replies, the same system applies in the US.

** Wot INSANE FUCKING CRAPOLOGY !!

The only relevant reply from the US so far indicates the DIRECT OPPOSITE .

Piss off - TROLLING BITCH.



...... Phil

 

[Phil Allison]

"kreed"

The scenario you mention with live entertainment is particularly bad,
as when you think about it, unlike a fixed installation you can't bond
the earth and neutral in these portable 3 phase to 240v outlet mains
boxes. If you did, it would trip any earth leakage breakers upstream
- if these are fitted.


To make matters worse, in live entertainment, the major loads are
almost all amplifiers, and lighting. None of these are stable loads
(amplifiers are changing their load current draw constantly with the
music and lights are being dimmed, flashed often in large groups. )


Therefore if the neutral lead fails, there is no bonding to earth to
back it up, unlike a residence, and with the inherent instabilty of
the load balance, massive damage is guaranteed.

** Current good practice for professional lighting dimmers is to use 800
volt rated triacs (so over-voltage will not trigger them) and 400 volt
rated primary transformers on each phase with a circuit on the secondaries
that detects any voltage imbalance.

Soon as a significant voltage imbalance is detected, all drive to the triacs
is instantly cancelled and it locks on.

Power amplifiers with iron transformers pretty much protect themselves by
blowing the AC fuse.

SMPSs of all sizes are vulnerable to instant damage or even exploding
electros.


...... Phil

 

[John-Melb]

On Nov 24, 12:24 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:

Well the US seems to believe that it's laws should be followed by other
countries so why shouldn't the reverse be true?

Please excuse the rantings of "Keefy".

He's Trevor Tosspot's "newest bestest friend" and one of the idiots
from aus.electronics who doesn't have an issue with O/T anti-gun rants
being posted there, but gets quite upset at any alternative viewpoint
appearing.

If you don't see things his way, the poor fragile fellow makes silly
assertions about your sexual preferences, really quite pathetic.

What "keefy" refuses to accept is it's his anti-gun mates who are
trying to enforce their belief system onto others.

Hey Keefy, how is Dorothy by the way?

 

[Dyna Soar]

John-Melb wrote:

"Dyna Soar" wrote:
John-Melb wrote:
"Dyna Soar" wrote:

If that's the case, you don't handle it too well, do you!
Which is all further proof of your paranoia.
Yet another example of some irrelevant "anti" believing he can
diagnose, let me guess, you went to the same med school as Keefy.

"anti"? Anti what?

You going to answer this?

As has been explained to you ad nauseam, one doesn't need to be
medically trained to observe your paranoia.

Then why is it, that those who are medically trained have never
observed or commented on it?

Obviously they don't read your posts on Usenet.

--
Dyna

All rights reserved. All wrongs avenged.

 

[John-Melb]

On Nov 24, 6:53 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:

Don't be so egotistical as to believe that anti-john means anti-gun.

Don't be a total dick-head.

Trevor Tosspot posted his O/T anti-gun rants on aus.electronics, you
said nothing, no criticism, no advice to take it where it's relevant,
nothing.

As soon as alternative viewpoint appeared, you and a couple of your
friends over on aus.electronics went feral.

You even followed it up by childishly questioning my sexuality

Now you're over here making inane comments about US laws.

And others are supposed to believe you're not anti-gun, you just don't
like me.

Yeah right................

 

[Dyna Soar]

John-Melb wrote:

Dyna Soar" wrote:
John-Melb wrote:
"Dyna Soar" wrote:
John-Melb wrote:
"Dyna Soar" wrote:

If that's the case, you don't handle it too well, do you!
Which is all further proof of your paranoia.

Yet another example of some irrelevant "anti" believing he can
diagnose, let me guess, you went to the same med school as Keefy.

"anti"? Anti what?

You going to answer this?

As has been explained to you ad nauseam, one doesn't need to be
medically trained to observe your paranoia.

Then why is it, that those who are medically trained have never
observed or commented on it?

Obviously they don't read your posts on Usenet.

Maybe they do

Wrong, if they did, they'd be aware of your paranoia.

Also, you've accused me of being an "anti",

This is now the third time I'm asking you to back that up.

Of what am I an "anti"? Or are you just making things up?

--
Dyna

All rights reserved. All wrongs avenged.

 

[John-Melb]

On Nov 24, 7:52 pm, "Dyna Soar"
<dynasoar..REMOVE..THI...@ozdebate.com> wrote:

John-Melb wrote:
 "Dyna  Soar" wrote:
John-Melb wrote:
 "Dyna Soar" wrote:
If that's the case, you don't handle it too well, do you!
Which is all further proof of your paranoia.
Yet another example of some irrelevant "anti" believing he can
diagnose, let me guess, you went to the same med school as Keefy.
"anti"? Anti what?

You going to answer this?

As has been explained to you ad nauseam, one doesn't need to be
medically trained to observe your paranoia.
Then why is it, that those who are medically trained have never
observed or commented on it?

Obviously they don't read your posts on Usenet.

Maybe they do

--
Dyna

All rights reserved. All wrongs avenged.

 

[John-Melb]

On Nov 24, 8:33 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:

John-Melb wrote:
On Nov 24, 6:53 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:

Don't be so egotistical as to believe that anti-john means anti-gun.

Don't be a total dick-head.

No problem, I don't see you as a role model

Trevor Tosspot posted his O/T anti-gun rants on aus.electronics, you
said nothing, no criticism, no advice to take it where it's relevant,
nothing.

Yada yada yada - repeated ad nauseum.

As soon as alternative viewpoint appeared, you and a couple of your
friends over on aus.electronics went feral.

yada yada yada - nothing new here.

You even followed it up by childishly questioning my sexuality

your reaction would seem to indicate that that is a sore point.

Now you're over here making inane comments about US laws.

Exactly what comments have I made about US laws?

And others are supposed to believe you're not anti-gun, you just don't
like me.

Yep, its not so hard really, guns are OK in their place, but you are an
arsehole.

Thanks

Simple enough for you?

 

[John-Melb]

On Nov 24, 8:33 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:

John-Melb wrote:
On Nov 24, 6:53 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:

Don't be so egotistical as to believe that anti-john means anti-gun.

Don't be a total dick-head.

No problem, I don't see you as a role model

Trevor Tosspot posted his O/T anti-gun rants on aus.electronics, you
said nothing, no criticism, no advice to take it where it's relevant,
nothing.

Yada yada yada - repeated ad nauseum.

As soon as alternative viewpoint appeared, you and a couple of your
friends over on aus.electronics went feral.

yada yada yada - nothing new here.

You even followed it up by childishly questioning my sexuality

your reaction would seem to indicate that that is a sore point.

Now you're over here making inane comments about US laws.

Exactly what comments have I made about US laws?

On Nov 24, 12:24 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:

Well the US seems to believe that it's laws should be followed by other
countries so why shouldn't the reverse be true?

And others are supposed to believe you're not anti-gun, you just don't
like me.

Yep, its not so hard really, guns are OK in their place, but you are an
arsehole.

Simple enough for you?