PRC as a amplifier in GPS question.

[Dyna Soar]

John-Melb wrote:

"Dyna Soar" wrote:

Wrong, if they did, they'd be aware of your paranoia.

Also, you've accused me of being an "anti",

This is now the third time I'm asking you to back that up.

Of what am I an "anti"? Or are you just making things up?

You're anti-guns and anti-gun owners.

Bullshit. All in your obsessed mind.
I've never posted any anti-gun or anti-gun owner posts. In fact, I have no
problem with responsible gun ownership although, to me, gun ownership is not
an important issue. My criticisms have always been the posting of off topic
shit, whether it be for or against guns, AGW or whatever.

I'll give you an analogy, Person A. Person B and Person C are among a
group who post on an internet discussion forum, let's call it
"alt.shovelnose" where they have interesting and in depth discussions
on their love of 1968 Toyota's.

Along comes Person D, who repeatedly posts O/T racist drivel on
"alt.shovelnose" slinging of particular groups within society, it
could be asians, jews catholics, muslims or any other group you wish
to name. Not once does Person A, Person B or Person C criticise Person
D, tell him his posts are O/T, tell him they're not interested in his
pet hates

Person E responds to this and gives alternative viewpoint on the
groups within society that Person D is vilifying.

Person A, Person B and Person C immediately start slinging off at
Person E.

Isn't it reasonable for Person E to assume that Person A, Person B and
Person C are just as racist as Person D, and hold similar beliefs?

No, your analogy is all flawed as far as I'm concerned. I've often posted
that I'm against anyone posting off topic shit to this group. That includes
posts either for or against ownership etc of guns.

***********

Many "anti's" are outright liars, and they hate they're lies being
exposed,

I'm ambivalent on the matter of guns, but can't help noticing the irony in
your comment.
There are just as many of the pro gun lobby who are "outright liars, and
hate their lies being exposed" as on the other side of the fence.
You appear to be so biased on the matter, it's made you paranoid.
Surely paranoia and guns are a dangerous mix.

***********
John - Melb wrote:

And none of the other precious darlings on aus.electronics seem to
have a problem with it ?

I have a problem with any off-topic postings, but don't have the paranoia
about it that you do.

*************

John - Melb wrote:

"Dyna Soar" wrote..

You've challenged me a number of times about responding to Trevor's
anti-gun rants on aus.electronics, have you ever challenged Trevor
about posting them here in the first place ?

Not sure if I have in this group, but I definitely have in others.

So you're not sure if you've ever challenged Trevor about his O/T
anti- gun rants appearing on aus.electronics, but you've challenged
me about countering them a number of times............Hmmm?

Can't you read English? I have challenged him before, but I'm not sure if
on this group.

***********

Hmm, I guess that's why no-one had an issue with Trevors inane anti-
gun rants on aus.electronics, but went feral when an alternative
viewpoint appeared.

Even if that were true (which I dispute) why the hell does it matter anyway,
particularly in a group you only inhabit to stalk Wilson?
Your paranoia is getting worse, John. And, before you again bring up the
"medical qualification" line, even Blind Freddy can see your obsession.
You and Wilson deserve one another. I personally would be happy if you both
pissed off from aus.electronics unless you're posting on topic.

***********

For Christ sake, John, put a sock in it! Or at least copy and paste a new
diatribe.

You keep on about this over and over and over again. Your paranoia is
increasing daily.

I, for one, object to any gun postings, for or against, by you or Wilson or
anyone else in aus.electronics and have made that known before.

***********


--
Dyna

All rights reserved. All wrongs avenged.

 

[John-Melb]

On Nov 24, 9:07 pm, "Dyna Soar"
<dynasoar..REMOVE..THI...@ozdebate.com> wrote:

Wrong, if they did, they'd be aware of your paranoia.

Also, you've accused me of being an "anti",

This is now the third time I'm asking you to back that up.

Of what am I an "anti"?  Or are you just making things up?

You're anti-guns and anti-gun owners.

I'll give you an analogy, Person A. Person B and Person C are among a
group who post on an internet discussion forum, let's call it
"alt.shovelnose" where they have interesting and in depth discussions
on their love of 1968 Toyota's.

Along comes Person D, who repeatedly posts O/T racist drivel on
"alt.shovelnose" slinging of particular groups within society, it
could be asians, jews catholics, muslims or any other group you wish
to name. Not once does Person A, Person B or Person C criticise Person
D, tell him his posts are O/T, tell him they're not interested in his
pet hates

Person E responds to this and gives alternative viewpoint on the
groups within society that Person D is vilifying.

Person A, Person B and Person C immediately start slinging off at
Person E.

Isn't it reasonable for Person E to assume that Person A, Person B and
Person C are just as racist as Person D, and hold similar beliefs?

--
Dyna

All rights reserved. All wrongs avenged.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

 

[Bruce Varley]

"Sylvia Else" <sylvia@not.at.this.address> wrote in message
news:0083b31e$0$1587$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com...

I have to phases of power supply to my house - so three power lines, two
phases plus neutral.

I've on occasion wondered what would happen if we lost the neutral line.
It seems to me that we'd then have the voltage between the two phases
across two sets of appliances, one set attached to one phase, and the
other set attached to the other phase, with the two sets in series as a
result of their common connection to the neutral wire. Since the two sets
are unlikely to represent equal loads, the net result would be a large
overvoltage on one set of appliances.

My electrician says it's not an issue, but I can't see why.

Any thoughts?

Sylvia.

It actually happened in our house about 2 weeks ago, an overgrown bush near
the incomer was the cause. First sign of trouble was unexpected swings in
light brightness when kitchen appliances were switched on. I checked with a
DVM, and saw phase voltages to neutral shifting between 275 volts (240
nominal) and 190 volts as appliances were turned on and off. Perhaps
fortunately, at the time we didn't have any electronics energised. There was
no equipment damage at all.

 

[keithr]

John-Melb wrote:

On Nov 24, 8:33 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
John-Melb wrote:
On Nov 24, 6:53 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
Don't be so egotistical as to believe that anti-john means anti-gun.
Don't be a total dick-head.
No problem, I don't see you as a role model

Trevor Tosspot posted his O/T anti-gun rants on aus.electronics, you
said nothing, no criticism, no advice to take it where it's relevant,
nothing.
Yada yada yada - repeated ad nauseum.

As soon as alternative viewpoint appeared, you and a couple of your
friends over on aus.electronics went feral.
yada yada yada - nothing new here.

You even followed it up by childishly questioning my sexuality
your reaction would seem to indicate that that is a sore point.

Now you're over here making inane comments about US laws.
Exactly what comments have I made about US laws?


On Nov 24, 12:24 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:

Well the US seems to believe that it's laws should be followed by other
countries so why shouldn't the reverse be true?

That is a comment on US attitudes not US laws, try and keep up

And others are supposed to believe you're not anti-gun, you just don't
like me.
Yep, its not so hard really, guns are OK in their place, but you are an
arsehole.

Simple enough for you?

 

[Dyna Soar]

John-Melb wrote:

On Nov 24, 10:20 pm, "Dyna Soar"
dynasoar..REMOVE..THI...@ozdebate.com> wrote:
John-Melb wrote:
"Dyna Soar" wrote:
Wrong, if they did, they'd be aware of your paranoia.
Also, you've accused me of being an "anti",
This is now the third time I'm asking you to back that up.
Of what am I an "anti"? Or are you just making things up?
You're anti-guns and anti-gun owners.

Bullshit. All in your obsessed mind.
I've never posted any anti-gun or anti-gun owner posts. In fact, I
have no problem with responsible gun ownership although, to me, gun
ownership is not an important issue. My criticisms have always been
the posting of off topic shit, whether it be for or against guns,
AGW or whatever.

Isn't it reasonable for Person E to assume that Person A, Person B
and Person C are just as racist as Person D, and hold similar
beliefs?

No, your analogy is all flawed as far as I'm concerned. I've often
posted that I'm against anyone posting off topic shit to this group.
That includes posts either for or against ownership etc of guns.

Read it again

"Not once does Person A, Person B or Person C criticise Person
D, tell him his posts are O/T, tell him they're not interested in his
pet hates"

Not once.

For a long time I've not answered *any* of Wilson's posts on *any* subject.
He's too big a dick to waste time on.
However, I've made it known often in other posts that I disapprove of his
off topic posts.

It appears you're too frigging stupid to understand this.


--
Dyna

All rights reserved. All wrongs avenged.

 

[John-Melb]

On Nov 24, 10:20 pm, "Dyna Soar"
<dynasoar..REMOVE..THI...@ozdebate.com> wrote:

John-Melb wrote:
 "Dyna  Soar"  wrote:
Wrong, if they did, they'd be aware of your paranoia.
Also, you've accused me of being an "anti",
This is now the third time I'm asking you to back that up.
Of what am I an "anti"? Or are you just making things up?
You're anti-guns and anti-gun owners.

Bullshit.  All in your obsessed mind.
I've never posted any anti-gun or anti-gun owner posts.  In fact, I have no
problem with responsible gun ownership although, to me, gun ownership is not
an important issue.  My criticisms have always been the posting of off topic
shit, whether it be for or against guns, AGW or whatever.





I'll give you an analogy, Person A. Person B and Person C are among a
group who post on an internet discussion forum, let's call it
"alt.shovelnose" where they have interesting and in depth discussions
on their love of 1968 Toyota's.
Along comes Person D, who repeatedly posts O/T racist drivel on
"alt.shovelnose" slinging of particular groups within society, it
could be asians, jews catholics, muslims or any other group you wish
to name. Not once does Person A, Person B or Person C criticise Person
D, tell him his posts are O/T, tell him they're not interested in his
pet hates
Person E responds to this and gives alternative viewpoint on the
groups within society that Person D is vilifying.
Person A, Person B and Person C immediately start slinging off at
Person E.
Isn't it reasonable for Person E to assume that Person A, Person B and
Person C are just as racist as Person D, and hold similar beliefs?

No, your analogy is all flawed as far as I'm concerned.  I've often posted
that I'm against anyone posting off topic shit to this group.  That includes
posts either for or against ownership etc of guns.

Read it again

"Not once does Person A, Person B or Person C criticise Person
D, tell him his posts are O/T, tell him they're not interested in his
pet hates"

Not once.

***********

Many "anti's" are outright liars, and they hate they're lies being
exposed,

I'm ambivalent on the matter of guns, but can't help noticing the irony in
your comment.
There are just as many of the pro gun lobby who are "outright liars, and
hate their lies being exposed" as on the other side of the fence.
You appear to be so biased on the matter, it's made you paranoid.
Surely paranoia and guns are a dangerous mix.

***********

John - Melb wrote:
And none of the other precious darlings on aus.electronics seem to
have a problem with it ?

I have a problem with any off-topic postings, but don't have the paranoia
about it that you do.

*************

John - Melb wrote:
 "Dyna  Soar" wrote..
You've challenged me a number of times about responding to Trevor's
anti-gun rants on aus.electronics, have you ever challenged Trevor
about posting them here in the first place ?
Not sure if I have in this group, but I definitely have in others.
So you're not sure if you've ever challenged Trevor about his O/T
anti- gun rants appearing on aus.electronics, but you've challenged
me about countering them a number of times............Hmmm?

Can't you read English?  I have challenged him before, but I'm not sure if
on this group.

***********

Hmm, I guess that's why no-one had an issue with Trevors inane anti-
gun rants on aus.electronics, but went feral when an alternative
viewpoint appeared.

Even if that were true (which I dispute) why the hell does it matter anyway,
particularly in a group you only inhabit to stalk Wilson?
Your paranoia is getting worse, John.  And, before you again bring up the
"medical qualification" line, even Blind Freddy can see your obsession.
You and Wilson deserve one another.  I personally would be happy if you both
pissed off from aus.electronics unless you're posting on topic.

***********

For Christ sake, John, put a sock in it!  Or at least copy and paste a new
diatribe.

You keep on about this over and over and over again.  Your paranoia is
increasing daily.

I, for one, object to any gun postings, for or against, by you or Wilson or
anyone else in aus.electronics and have made that known before.

***********

--
Dyna

All rights reserved. All wrongs avenged.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

 

[John-Melb]

On Nov 24, 11:11 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:

John-Melb wrote:
On Nov 24, 8:33 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
John-Melb wrote:
On Nov 24, 6:53 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
Don't be so egotistical as to believe that anti-john means anti-gun.
Don't be a total dick-head.
No problem, I don't see you as a role model

Trevor Tosspot posted his O/T anti-gun rants on aus.electronics, you
said nothing, no criticism, no advice to take it where it's relevant,
nothing.
Yada yada yada - repeated ad nauseum.

As soon as alternative viewpoint appeared, you and a couple of your
friends over on aus.electronics went feral.
yada yada yada - nothing new here.

You even followed it up by childishly questioning my sexuality
your reaction would seem to indicate that that is a sore point.

Now you're over here making inane comments about US laws.
Exactly what comments have I made about US laws?

On Nov 24, 12:24 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:

Well the US seems to believe that it's laws should be followed by other
countries so why shouldn't the reverse be true?

That is a comment on US attitudes not US laws, try and keep up

Yes, Trevor Tosspot doesn't appear to like Americans much
either.........

Funny about that

And others are supposed to believe you're not anti-gun, you just don't
like me.
Yep, its not so hard really, guns are OK in their place, but you are an
arsehole.

Simple enough for you?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

 

[John-Melb]

On Nov 24, 11:14 pm, "Dyna Soar"
<dynasoar..REMOVE..THI...@ozdebate.com> wrote:

For a long time I've not answered *any* of Wilson's posts on *any* subject.
He's too big a dick to waste time on.

No he's not, he's one of aus.electronics "longest and most highly
respected members" ( or something like that).that was one of the first
response I got when I responded to his anti-gun rantiing on
aus.electronics.

However, I've made it known often in other posts that I disapprove of his
off topic posts.

You've just proved my point

" Not once does Person A, Person B or Person C criticise Person
D, tell him his posts are O/T, tell him they're not interested in his
pet hates"

Not once.

It appears  you're too frigging stupid to understand this.

It appears you and Trevor Tosspot share opinions on a number of
subjects, including me, that's nice to know

--
Dyna

All rights reserved. All wrongs avenged.

Interesting sig line, I guess if the wrongs are vilification of a
class persons of which you are a member, but that class of persons
just happens to be gun owners, this coesn't count huh?

- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

 

[Phil Allison]

"Phil Allison"

"kreed"


The exception here could be blocks of flats, if the main neutral to
the building fails, and there isn't a good earth, the imbalance could
be a risk.

** If that situation arose it would be possible to break the flats into
three groups and feed each group with their own phase and neutral conductor.



..... Phil

 

[keithr]

Jeßus wrote:

In article <7muumpF3jjppaU1@mid.individual.net>,
dynasoar..REMOVE..THIS..@ozdebate.com said...
:
:John-Melb wrote:
:> On Nov 23, 6:37 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
:
:>> And who are these "Anti-gun idiots"?
:
:> Let's see now,
:
:> The description includes those who don't have an issue with anti-gun
:> zealots posting their claptrap on other groups, but who go feral when
:> an alternative viewpoint appears in the same forum.
:
:> Remind you of anyone?
:
:> How is Dorothy, by the way?
:
:For Christ sake, John, put a sock in it! Or at least copy and paste a new
:diatribe.
:
:You keep on about this over and over and over again. Your paranoia is
:increasing daily.
:
:I, for one, object to any gun postings, for or against, by you or Wilson or
:anyone else in aus.electronics and have made that known before.
:
:Go and beat up a prisoner or something, it may help you overcome your
bsessions.

This guy is a screw? Look at the poor judgment he shows on Usenet - and
this same guy is in charge of prisoners?

So rumour has it.

 

[John-Melb]

On Nov 25, 9:04 am, keithr <kei...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:

On 25/11/2009 6:20 AM, John-Melb wrote:





On Nov 24, 11:11 pm, keithr<ke...@nowhere.com.au>  wrote:
John-Melb wrote:
On Nov 24, 8:33 pm, keithr<ke...@nowhere.com.au>  wrote:
John-Melb wrote:
On Nov 24, 6:53 pm, keithr<ke...@nowhere.com.au>  wrote:
Don't be so egotistical as to believe that anti-john means anti-gun.
Don't be a total dick-head.
No problem, I don't see you as a role model

Trevor Tosspot posted his O/T anti-gun rants on aus.electronics, you
said nothing, no criticism, no advice to take it where it's relevant,
nothing.
Yada yada yada - repeated ad nauseum.

As soon as alternative viewpoint appeared, you and a couple of your
friends over on aus.electronics went feral.
yada yada yada - nothing new here.

You even followed it up by childishly questioning my sexuality
your reaction would seem to indicate that that is a sore point.

Now you're over here making inane comments about US laws.
Exactly what comments have I made about US laws?

On Nov 24, 12:24 pm, keithr<ke...@nowhere.com.au>  wrote:

Well the US seems to believe that it's laws should be followed by other
countries so why shouldn't the reverse be true?

That is a comment on US attitudes not US laws, try and keep up

Yes, Trevor Tosspot doesn't appear to like Americans much
either.........

Funny about that

And what is the relevance of that?

I was an onservation that you're getting more and more like your
"Newest, bestest friend every day, they'll soon be refering to you two
as "bookends"

Actually, I quite like America, I lived there for five and a half years,
and have spent 3 - 6 weeks a year there in the 6 years since I returned
to Australia. Liking the place though does not mean that I like all
American attitudes any more than being anti-john means that I am anti-gun..

You really do have trouble grasping even the simplest of concepts don't you?



And others are supposed to believe you're not anti-gun, you just don't
like me.
Yep, its not so hard really, guns are OK in their place, but you are an
arsehole.

Simple enough for you?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

 

[John-Melb]

On Nov 26, 6:41 am, John-Melb <mcnamara_j...@hotmail.com> wrote:

On Nov 25, 7:38 am, "Trevor Wilson" <tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au
wrote:





**Not that you'll pay any attention, nor even understand my words, I will
now place on the record my feeling in this matter.

* Some Americans are bad.
* Some Americans are good.
* Some Americans are stupid.
* Some Americans are smart.
* Some Americans are delusional paranoid.
* Some Americans are sane, well balanced humans.
* I like some of the Americans I've met (funnily enough, I liked the ones
from NYC and Texas).
* I dispise some Americans I've met (I was not all that enamoured with LA
residents).
* IMO, American gun control laws are stupid, haphazard and poorly policed.

Clear

Not the sort of thing's you've said in the past
---------------------------------------------------------------
On May 21, 11:08 am, "Trevor Wilson"

tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote:
**Perhaps you're smarter than mostAmericans. Most of them think that Hugh
Lawrie is an American.

----------------------------------------------------------------
On Jun 16, 7:03 pm, "Trevor Wilson" <tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au
wrote:

 Lock 'em up. Unless, of course, you'd prefer to
live in a state of paranoia, like mostAmericansdo.

--------------------------------------------------------------------
On Oct 25 2004, 4:36 pm, "Trevor Wilson"

tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote:
**That much is abundantly clear to the entire planet. After, all the
majority of you clowns voted for a brain dead, religious nutter for your
President. That fact, alone, is evidence that at least 50% of the US
population doesn't have a clue.
**Sure. None of us ever expectAmericansto be smarter than we orginally
figured. You'll just confirm your own lack of critical thinking ability..

-------------------------------------------------------------
On Dec 6 2006, 2:21 pm, "Trevor Wilson"

tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote:
** I've met quite a fewAmericanswho live well above the poverty line and are as dumb as a pile of
rocks.

---------------------------------------------------------------
On Mar 10 2006, 1:38 pm, "Trevor Wilson"

tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote:
**Don't forget: Fat, lazy-arsedAmericans.

--------------------------------------------------------------

Do you change your underpants as often as you change your assertions?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

 

[Jeßus]

In article <7muumpF3jjppaU1@mid.individual.net>,
dynasoar..REMOVE..THIS..@ozdebate.com said...
:
:John-Melb wrote:
:> On Nov 23, 6:37 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
:
:>> And who are these "Anti-gun idiots"?
:
:> Let's see now,
:
:> The description includes those who don't have an issue with anti-gun
:> zealots posting their claptrap on other groups, but who go feral when
:> an alternative viewpoint appears in the same forum.
:
:> Remind you of anyone?
:
:> How is Dorothy, by the way?
:
:For Christ sake, John, put a sock in it! Or at least copy and paste a new
:diatribe.
:
:You keep on about this over and over and over again. Your paranoia is
:increasing daily.
:
:I, for one, object to any gun postings, for or against, by you or Wilson or
:anyone else in aus.electronics and have made that known before.
:
:Go and beat up a prisoner or something, it may help you overcome your
bsessions.

This guy is a screw? Look at the poor judgment he shows on Usenet - and
this same guy is in charge of prisoners?

 

[Jeßus]

In article <7mv3vlF3ikaf0U2@mid.individual.net>,
dynasoar..REMOVE..THIS..@ozdebate.com said...
:
:John-Melb wrote:
:> "Dyna Soar" wrote:
:
:>> Go and beat up a prisoner or something, it may help you overcome your
:>> obsessions.
:
:> Fuck you, and fuck the horse you rode in on too!
:
:Strike a nerve, did I?

Interesting theory, but no go, I'm afraid.
That would imply he has nerve endings, which presumably are wired to a
brain via at least a few synapses.

 

[Bob Larter]

keithr wrote:

Jeßus wrote:
In article <7muumpF3jjppaU1@mid.individual.net>,
dynasoar..REMOVE..THIS..@ozdebate.com said...
:
:John-Melb wrote:
:> On Nov 23, 6:37 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
:
:>> And who are these "Anti-gun idiots"?
:
:> Let's see now,
:
:> The description includes those who don't have an issue with anti-gun
:> zealots posting their claptrap on other groups, but who go feral when
:> an alternative viewpoint appears in the same forum.
:
:> Remind you of anyone?
:
:> How is Dorothy, by the way?
:
:For Christ sake, John, put a sock in it! Or at least copy and paste
a new :diatribe.
:
:You keep on about this over and over and over again. Your paranoia
is :increasing daily.
:
:I, for one, object to any gun postings, for or against, by you or
Wilson or :anyone else in aus.electronics and have made that known
before.
:
:Go and beat up a prisoner or something, it may help you overcome your
bsessions.

This guy is a screw? Look at the poor judgment he shows on Usenet -
and this same guy is in charge of prisoners?

So rumour has it.

That's scary. Never thought I'd feel sorry for prisoners.

--
W
. | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because
\|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------

 

[Bob Larter]

F Murtz wrote:

Sylvia Else wrote:
PeterD wrote:
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 10:33:40 +1100, Sylvia Else
sylvia@not.at.this.address> wrote:

terryc wrote:
On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 22:12:24 +1100, Phil Allison wrote:


Would the two utility meters correctly reflect the energy I
consumed?
**Briefly, yes.
** Indefinitely, actually.
Yep, that is how 415VAC is obtained.
But is it how it's metered?

I haven't gone through the math, and I'd overlooked the fact that
each meter sees a power factor of less than one, so I can't say now
whether I think the meters would read correctly. But if there's a way
of looking at the problem that makes the answer obvious, I've yet to
see it.

Sylvia.


Do it the old fashioned way: make a test! Can't be that difficult, can
it?

Of course not. I'll just get out the 415VAC resistive load I happen to
have lying around, and see what registers.

Sylvia.
Two large lamps in series.

Yep. A pair of 100W/240V lightbulbs should do the trick.

--
W
. | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because
\|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------

 

[What The]

"Franc Zabkar" <fzabkar@iinternode.on.net> wrote in message
news:b4dcg5t0b8idutkpin4hi3pqksavlee3h3@4ax.com...

Here is a UV toothbrush steriliser for AU$15:
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/UV-TOOTHBRUSH-SANITIZER-STERILIZER-Portable-NEW-IN-BOX_W0QQitemZ370291635298QQcmdZViewItemQQptZAU_Body_Care?hash=item563719f462

Silicon Chip Magazine once adapted a similar Jaycar gadget for erasing
EPROMs.

See http://www.siliconchip.com.au/cms/A_104058/article.html

http://us1.webpublications.com.au/static/images/articles/i1040/104058_2mg.jpg
http://us1.webpublications.com.au/static/images/articles/i1040/104058_3mg.jpg
http://us1.webpublications.com.au/static/images/articles/i1040/104058_4mg.jpg
http://us1.webpublications.com.au/static/images/articles/i1040/104058_5mg.jpg
http://us1.webpublications.com.au/static/images/articles/i1040/104058_6mg.jpg
http://us1.webpublications.com.au/static/images/articles/i1040/104058_7mg.jpg
http://us1.webpublications.com.au/static/images/articles/i1040/104058_8mg.jpg

The timer had to be extended by adding a timing capacitor in parallel
with the existing one.

- Franc Zabkar
--
Please remove one 'i' from my address when replying by email.

Thanks Franc. I stumbled across that article when i was searching, only to
find jaycar didn't sell them anymore. I managed to get a batch of 15 EEPROMs
(pin compatible) foir <25AUD delivered so it worked out OK in the end,
however, i might grab one of those just in case i get another situation that
i don't have a pin compatible chip to replace.

Cheers.

 

[Tom]

What The wrote:

"Franc Zabkar" <fzabkar@iinternode.on.net> wrote in message
news:b4dcg5t0b8idutkpin4hi3pqksavlee3h3@4ax.com...

Here is a UV toothbrush steriliser for AU$15:
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/UV-TOOTHBRUSH-SANITIZER-STERILIZER-Portable-NEW-IN-BOX_W0QQitemZ370291635298QQcmdZViewItemQQptZAU_Body_Care?hash=item563719f462

Silicon Chip Magazine once adapted a similar Jaycar gadget for erasing
EPROMs.

See http://www.siliconchip.com.au/cms/A_104058/article.html

http://us1.webpublications.com.au/static/images/articles/i1040/104058_2mg.jpg
http://us1.webpublications.com.au/static/images/articles/i1040/104058_3mg.jpg
http://us1.webpublications.com.au/static/images/articles/i1040/104058_4mg.jpg
http://us1.webpublications.com.au/static/images/articles/i1040/104058_5mg.jpg
http://us1.webpublications.com.au/static/images/articles/i1040/104058_6mg.jpg
http://us1.webpublications.com.au/static/images/articles/i1040/104058_7mg.jpg
http://us1.webpublications.com.au/static/images/articles/i1040/104058_8mg.jpg

The timer had to be extended by adding a timing capacitor in parallel
with the existing one.

- Franc Zabkar
--
Please remove one 'i' from my address when replying by email.



Thanks Franc. I stumbled across that article when i was searching, only to
find jaycar didn't sell them anymore. I managed to get a batch of 15 EEPROMs
(pin compatible) foir <25AUD delivered so it worked out OK in the end,
however, i might grab one of those just in case i get another situation that
i don't have a pin compatible chip to replace.

Cheers.


If it's only for rare use why not use sunlight.

Tom

 

[who where]

On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:06:17 +1000, Tom <tom@no.spam.invalid> wrote:

If it's only for rare use why not use sunlight.

I presume that means you've had success with that method. We've tried
it on the odd occasion over the years (Perth) and found nary a bit
nuked after a week out in the sun. YMMV but I wouldn't be wasting my
time trying it again.

 

[Tom]

who where wrote:

On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:06:17 +1000, Tom <tom@no.spam.invalid> wrote:

If it's only for rare use why not use sunlight.

I presume that means you've had success with that method. We've tried
it on the odd occasion over the years (Perth) and found nary a bit
nuked after a week out in the sun. YMMV but I wouldn't be wasting my
time trying it again.

Was that direct sunlight or through the window?
Tom