PRC as a amplifier in GPS question.

[Franc Zabkar]

On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 05:48:01 GMT, "Mickel" <mickle@nospam.com> put
finger to keyboard and composed:

"What The" <none@none.com> wrote in message
news:8_7Mm.55236$ze1.3010@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
Anyone in Sydney have one of these kicking around. Need to erase some old
27C512 chips (so it doesn't need to be huge) and don't feel like paying
$25 out of china along with the 1 week wait for something that i imagine
may be collecting dust on your bookcase.

Use that big bright ball in the sky, it's free even if it is a bit slow.

Michael

Here is a UV toothbrush steriliser for AU$15:
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/UV-TOOTHBRUSH-SANITIZER-STERILIZER-Portable-NEW-IN-BOX_W0QQitemZ370291635298QQcmdZViewItemQQptZAU_Body_Care?hash=item563719f462

Silicon Chip Magazine once adapted a similar Jaycar gadget for erasing
EPROMs.

See http://www.siliconchip.com.au/cms/A_104058/article.html

http://us1.webpublications.com.au/static/images/articles/i1040/104058_2mg.jpg
http://us1.webpublications.com.au/static/images/articles/i1040/104058_3mg.jpg
http://us1.webpublications.com.au/static/images/articles/i1040/104058_4mg.jpg
http://us1.webpublications.com.au/static/images/articles/i1040/104058_5mg.jpg
http://us1.webpublications.com.au/static/images/articles/i1040/104058_6mg.jpg
http://us1.webpublications.com.au/static/images/articles/i1040/104058_7mg.jpg
http://us1.webpublications.com.au/static/images/articles/i1040/104058_8mg.jpg

The timer had to be extended by adding a timing capacitor in parallel
with the existing one.

- Franc Zabkar
--
Please remove one 'i' from my address when replying by email.

 

[keithr]

On 19/11/2009 8:47 PM, John-Melb wrote:

On Nov 19, 7:44 pm, keithr<ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
John-Melb wrote:
On Nov 18, 8:24 pm, keithr<ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:

Which obviously makes you every bit as bad as he is. It is pure
hypocrisy to complain about trevor posting about gun politics in those
groups and then doing it your self. You and he are one and the same.

Yes, Keith, you've already made it quite clear that you don't have an
issue with Trevor posting his O/T rants on aus.electronics, but get
quite upset when alternative viewpoint appears.

Yada yada yada, are you capable of more than one idea?

Yes, why do you ask?


How is Dorothy, by the way?

Don't ask me after all it is your friend not mine.

You raised mention of Dorothy before me

Seek treatment now, the longer you leave it, the more your trevor
obsession will hurt you.

And you medical qualifications for recommending "treatment" are?

A lifetimes observation of those who needed treatment and those who did not.

 

[Jeßus]

In article <4b0504a0@dnews.tpgi.com.au>, keith@nowhere.com.au said...
:
:Jeßus wrote:
:> In article <8225cabc-2846-45e9-8ce1-1e35eb256494
:> @h40g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, mcnamara_john@hotmail.com said...
:> :
:> :On Nov 18, 4:08 pm, the watcher <""coffeyman\"@out the back.com.au">
:> :wrote:
:> :
:> :> you seem to be somewhat delayed yourself,this is the professional term
:> :> for beingretarded. btw. what would it be about crossposting being poor
:> :> usenet etiquette that YOU seemingly arefailing to grasp? or is this
:> :> group NOT aus.hi-fi? pot,kettle,black!!
:> :> Professionally yours
:> :> Dr Patric
:> :
:> :Interesting, tell me, when Trevor Tosspot previously used aus.hi-fi to
:> :launch his anti-gun venom and vitriol, did you complain about his
:> osts, or do you find them OK, and are just upset when an alternative
:> :viewpoint appears?
:> :
:> :After all, I do play by Tosspot's rules.
:>
:> You really are a fuckwit.
:> And I suspect, an anti-gun nut in disguise.
:
:You may be right, he seems hell-bent on ruining the reputation of gun
wners.

Exactly.

 

[Jeßus]

In article <620f3005-d787-4612-be90-
0f9f1136998f@s21g2000prm.googlegroups.com>, mcnamara_john@hotmail.com
said...
:
:On Nov 19, 7:44 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
:> John-Melb wrote:
:> > On Nov 18, 8:24 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
:>
:> >> Which obviously makes you every bit as bad as he is. It is pure
:> >> hypocrisy to complain about trevor posting about gun politics in those
:> >> groups and then doing it your self. You and he are one and the same.
:>
:> > Yes, Keith, you've already made it quite clear that you don't have an
:> > issue with Trevor posting his O/T rants on aus.electronics, but get
:> > quite upset when alternative viewpoint appears.
:>
:> Yada yada yada, are you capable of more than one idea?
:
:Yes, why do you ask?
:
:>
:> > How is Dorothy, by the way?
:>
:> Don't ask me after all it is your friend not mine.
:
:You raised mention of Dorothy before me
:
:> Seek treatment now, the longer you leave it, the more your trevor
:> obsession will hurt you.
:
:And you medical qualifications for recommending "treatment" are?

And yours are? Considering your frequent diagnosis of Trevor...

 

[Dyna Soar]

John-Melb wrote:

On Nov 22, 12:04 pm, keithr <kei...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:

I move in circles where anti gun ranting is equally as acceptable as
pro gun ranting i.e. nobody wants to hear either. Thats why trevor
gets ignored when he get in one of his rants, same as you would do
if you had any sense.

Hmm, I guess that's why no-one had an issue with Trevors inane anti-
gun rants on aus.electronics, but went feral when an alternative
viewpoint appeared.

Even if that were true (which I dispute) why the hell does it matter anyway,
particularly in a group you only inhabit to stalk Wilson?
Your paranoia is getting worse, John. And, before you again bring up the
"medical qualification" line, even Blind Freddy can see your obsession.
You and Wilson deserve one another. I personally would be happy if you both
pissed off from aus.electronics unless you're posting on topic.


--
Dyna

All rights reserved. All wrongs avenged.

 

[John-Melb]

On Nov 22, 12:04 pm, keithr <kei...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:

I move in circles where anti gun ranting is equally as acceptable as pro
gun ranting i.e. nobody wants to hear either. Thats why trevor gets
ignored when he get in one of his rants, same as you would do if you had
any sense.

Hmm, I guess that's why no-one had an issue with Trevors inane anti-
gun rants on aus.electronics, but went feral when an alternative
viewpoint appeared.

 

[Dyna Soar]

John-Melb wrote:

"Dyna Soar" wrote:

Even if that were true (which I dispute) why the hell does it matter
anyway, particularly in a group you only inhabit to stalk Wilson?
Your paranoia is getting worse, John. And, before you again bring up
the "medical qualification" line, even Blind Freddy can see your
obsession.
You and Wilson deserve one another. I personally would be happy if
you both pissed off from aus.electronics unless you're posting on
topic.

Does "Blind Freddy" post on aus.electronics too?

Can't say I've ever read anything by him.

I suspect you are quite aware of the colloquial expression "Blind Freddy",
and you're pleading ignorance as an excuse for avoiding answering the
criticism.

But. just in case your education was very lacking...

http://www.allwords.com/word-Blind+Freddy.html
(colloquial) Imaginary incapacitated person. Used as a standard or archetype
of incapacity, in the sense that if Blind Freddy can see or know something
then it must be obvious.


--
Dyna

All rights reserved. All wrongs avenged.

 

[John-Melb]

On Nov 22, 9:03 pm, "Dyna Soar"
<dynasoar..REMOVE..THI...@ozdebate.com> wrote:

Even if that were true (which I dispute) why the hell does it matter anyway,
particularly in a group you only inhabit to stalk Wilson?
Your paranoia is getting worse, John.  And, before you again bring up the
"medical qualification" line, even Blind Freddy can see your obsession.
You and Wilson deserve one another.  I personally would be happy if you both
pissed off from aus.electronics unless you're posting on topic.

Does "Blind Freddy" post on aus.electronics too?

Can't say I've ever read anything by him.

 

[keithr]

Dyna Soar wrote:

John-Melb wrote:
"Dyna Soar" wrote:

Even if that were true (which I dispute) why the hell does it matter
anyway, particularly in a group you only inhabit to stalk Wilson?
Your paranoia is getting worse, John. And, before you again bring up
the "medical qualification" line, even Blind Freddy can see your
obsession.
You and Wilson deserve one another. I personally would be happy if
you both pissed off from aus.electronics unless you're posting on
topic.

Does "Blind Freddy" post on aus.electronics too?

Can't say I've ever read anything by him.

I suspect you are quite aware of the colloquial expression "Blind Freddy",
and you're pleading ignorance as an excuse for avoiding answering the
criticism.

But. just in case your education was very lacking...

http://www.allwords.com/word-Blind+Freddy.html
(colloquial) Imaginary incapacitated person. Used as a standard or archetype
of incapacity, in the sense that if Blind Freddy can see or know something
then it must be obvious.


Don't worry about it, just john's attempt at a witticism - a failure

just as you would expect.

 

[John-Melb]

On Nov 22, 9:37 pm, "Dyna Soar"
<dynasoar..REMOVE..THI...@ozdebate.com> wrote:

John-Melb wrote:
 "Dyna  Soar" wrote:
Even if that were true (which I dispute) why the hell does it matter
anyway, particularly in a group you only inhabit to stalk Wilson?
Your paranoia is getting worse, John. And, before you again bring up
the "medical qualification" line, even Blind Freddy can see your
obsession.
You and Wilson deserve one another. I personally would be happy if
you both pissed off from aus.electronics unless you're posting on
topic.
Does "Blind Freddy" post on aus.electronics too?
Can't say I've ever read anything by him.

I suspect you are quite aware of the colloquial expression "Blind Freddy",
and you're pleading ignorance as an excuse for avoiding answering the
criticism.

But. just in case your education was very lacking...

http://www.allwords.com/word-Blind+Freddy.html
(colloquial) Imaginary incapacitated person. Used as a standard or archetype
of incapacity, in the sense that if Blind Freddy can see or know something
then it must be obvious.

--
Dyna

All rights reserved. All wrongs avenged.

So, someone who doesn't actually exist could see my "obsession"

Fascinating, so I guess you folks on aus.electronics don't mind
Trevor's rants but get upset at alternative viewpoint being posted
because the fairies at the bottom of the garden told you too?

 

[Jeßus]

In article <7msgj8F3jnu7hU1@mid.individual.net>,
dynasoar..REMOVE..THIS..@ozdebate.com said...
:
:John-Melb wrote:
:> On Nov 22, 12:04 pm, keithr <kei...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
:
:>> I move in circles where anti gun ranting is equally as acceptable as
:>> pro gun ranting i.e. nobody wants to hear either. Thats why trevor
:>> gets ignored when he get in one of his rants, same as you would do
:>> if you had any sense.
:
:> Hmm, I guess that's why no-one had an issue with Trevors inane anti-
:> gun rants on aus.electronics, but went feral when an alternative
:> viewpoint appeared.
:
:Even if that were true (which I dispute) why the hell does it matter anyway,
articularly in a group you only inhabit to stalk Wilson?
:Your paranoia is getting worse, John. And, before you again bring up the
:"medical qualification" line, even Blind Freddy can see your obsession.
:You and Wilson deserve one another. I personally would be happy if you both
issed off from aus.electronics unless you're posting on topic.

As a gun owner, I just wish he would STFU with his counterproductive
diatribes and chasing TW around in aus.electronics (and any other OT
venue for that matter).

We don't need idiots like him making a noise - he's only making a better
case for the anti-gun crowd.

I've said it often enough - but sometimes I really wonder if he's a
'double agent', and in fact anti-gun.

 

[Dyna Soar]

John-Melb wrote:

On Nov 23, 6:37 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:

And who are these "Anti-gun idiots"?

Let's see now,

The description includes those who don't have an issue with anti-gun
zealots posting their claptrap on other groups, but who go feral when
an alternative viewpoint appears in the same forum.

Remind you of anyone?

How is Dorothy, by the way?

For Christ sake, John, put a sock in it! Or at least copy and paste a new
diatribe.

You keep on about this over and over and over again. Your paranoia is
increasing daily.

I, for one, object to any gun postings, for or against, by you or Wilson or
anyone else in aus.electronics and have made that known before.

Go and beat up a prisoner or something, it may help you overcome your
obsessions.

--
Dyna

All rights reserved. All wrongs avenged.

 

[John-Melb]

On Nov 23, 6:37 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:

And who are these "Anti-gun idiots"?

Let's see now,

The description includes those who don't have an issue with anti-gun
zealots posting their claptrap on other groups, but who go feral when
an alternative viewpoint appears in the same forum.

Remind you of anyone?

How is Dorothy, by the way?

 

[John-Melb]

On Nov 23, 7:16 pm, "Dyna Soar"
<dynasoar..REMOVE..THI...@ozdebate.com> wrote:

John-Melb wrote:
On Nov 23, 6:37 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
And who are these "Anti-gun idiots"?
Let's see now,
The description includes those who don't have an issue with anti-gun
zealots posting their claptrap on other groups, but who go feral when
an alternative viewpoint appears in the same forum.
Remind you of anyone?
How is Dorothy, by the way?

For Christ sake, John, put a sock in it!  Or at least copy and paste a new
diatribe.

You keep on about this over and over and over again.  Your paranoia is
increasing daily.

I, for one, object to any gun postings, for or against, by you or Wilson or
anyone else in aus.electronics and have made that known before.

You got a cite for that?

Go and beat up a prisoner or something, it may help you overcome your
obsessions.

--
Dyna

All rights reserved. All wrongs avenged.

 

[John-Melb]

On Nov 23, 7:16 pm, "Dyna Soar"
<dynasoar..REMOVE..THI...@ozdebate.com> wrote:

For Christ sake, John, put a sock in it!  Or at least copy and paste a new
diatribe.

You keep on about this over and over and over again.  Your paranoia is
increasing daily.

I, for one, object to any gun postings, for or against, by you or Wilson or
anyone else in aus.electronics and have made that known before.

I found a number of Wilson's anti-gun and anti-gun owner rants on
aus.electronics.

Not one other poster told him his posts were off topic, not one other
poster told him to take it to where people were interested, not one
other poster criticised his O/T anti-gun rants in any way.

As soon as I started providing alternative viewpoint, I started
copping flack. I even had "Keefy" questioning my sexual preferences.

Go and beat up a prisoner or something, it may help you overcome your
obsessions.

Fuck you, and fuck the horse you rode in on too!

--
Dyna

All rights reserved. All wrongs avenged.

 

[Dyna Soar]

John-Melb wrote:

"Dyna Soar" wrote:

For Christ sake, John, put a sock in it! Or at least copy and paste
a new diatribe.

You keep on about this over and over and over again. Your paranoia is
increasing daily.

I, for one, object to any gun postings, for or against, by you or
Wilson or anyone else in aus.electronics and have made that known
before.

You got a cite for that?

From my "sent" folder...

*********
You have actually demonstrated your
paranoia as much as Trevor does. The two of you, as far as this goes, are
identical to one another

*********

You have a problem with Trevor Wilson? OK, many of us do. But we, unlike
you, are men enough to ignore him and get on with life.

**********

Why do you even bother reading this group when you make absolutely no
posts about electronics? We know the answer, of course, it's your obsession
with Wilson. I have news for you, he just ain't worth it.

**********

I'm sure many have a problem with both anti-gun or pro-gun viewpoints in
this group. I know I do. Perhaps they're not as vocal.

Actually, I regard Wilson as a complete nutter and no longer respond to any
of his posts. Why don't you do the same?

**********

Yes, I guess you'd like to see Trevor's anti-gun bile be posted
without ever being challenged.

Bloody Hell, you're obsessing again, where did I state that? I'd prefer if
Wilson just pissed off. Just as I'd prefer you to piss off, too. However,
this is Usenet and, to quote Roddles, each of us get no say in where and
what another posts.

**********

You rant about many things, AGW, guns, whatever, then proceed to use the
terms, "we" and "everybody".
Some of the things you rant about, I agree with. Equally, I disagree with
other sections of your rants.

So DON'T SPEAK FOR ME!!! You have no tight to so do and by doing so, you're
actually lying.

*********

You and Wilson deserve one another. I personally would be happy if you both
pissed off from aus.electronics unless you're posting on topic.

**********

--
Dyna

All rights reserved. All wrongs avenged.

 

[Dyna Soar]

John-Melb wrote:

"Dyna Soar" wrote:

Go and beat up a prisoner or something, it may help you overcome your
obsessions.

Fuck you, and fuck the horse you rode in on too!

Strike a nerve, did I?


--
Dyna

All rights reserved. All wrongs avenged.

 

[Dyna Soar]

John-Melb wrote:

"Dyna Soar" wrote:
John-Melb wrote:
"Dyna Soar" wrote:

Go and beat up a prisoner or something, it may help you overcome
your obsessions.

Fuck you, and fuck the horse you rode in on too!

Strike a nerve, did I?

I think your comment was more illustrative of you than of me

Yeah, you're right about that. It was childish and I apologise.


--
Dyna

All rights reserved. All wrongs avenged.

 

[John-Melb]

On Nov 23, 8:44 pm, "Dyna Soar"
<dynasoar..REMOVE..THI...@ozdebate.com> wrote:

From my "sent" folder...

*********
You have actually demonstrated your
paranoia as much as Trevor does.  The two of you, as far as this goes, are
identical to one another

*********

You have a problem with Trevor Wilson?  OK,  many of us do.  But we, unlike
you, are men enough to ignore him and get on with life.

**********

Why do you even bother reading this group when you make absolutely no
posts about electronics?  We know the answer, of course, it's your obsession
with Wilson.  I have news for you, he just ain't worth it.

**********

I'm sure many have a problem with both anti-gun or pro-gun viewpoints in
this group.  I know I do.  Perhaps they're not as vocal.

Actually, I regard Wilson as a complete nutter and no longer respond to any
of his posts.  Why don't you do the same?

**********

Yes, I guess you'd like to see Trevor's anti-gun bile be posted
without ever being challenged.

Bloody Hell, you're obsessing again, where did I state that?  I'd prefer if
Wilson just pissed off.  Just as I'd prefer you to piss off, too.  However,
this is Usenet and, to quote Roddles, each of us get no say in where and
what another posts.

**********

You rant about many things, AGW, guns, whatever, then proceed to use the
terms, "we" and "everybody".
Some of the things you rant about, I agree with.  Equally, I disagree with
other sections of your rants.

So DON'T SPEAK FOR ME!!!  You have no tight to so do and by doing so, you're
actually lying.

*********

You and Wilson deserve one another.  I personally would be happy if you both
pissed off from aus.electronics unless you're posting on topic.

**********

--
Dyna

All rights reserved. All wrongs avenged.

Er, Dyna. not one of those quotes was having a go at Trevor for his O/
T anti-gun rants on aus.electronics. One was having a go at Trevor for
his empirical use of the term "we", the vast majority of them were
directed at me.

I guess you've just proved my point.

 

[John-Melb]

On Nov 23, 8:46 pm, "Dyna Soar"
<dynasoar..REMOVE..THI...@ozdebate.com> wrote:

John-Melb wrote:
 "Dyna  Soar" wrote:
Go and beat up a prisoner or something, it may help you overcome your
obsessions.
Fuck you, and fuck the horse you rode in on too!

Strike a nerve, did I?

I think your comment was more illustrative of you than of me

--
Dyna

All rights reserved. All wrongs avenged.