PRC as a amplifier in GPS question.

[Bob Larter]

Davo wrote:

Bob Larter wrote:
F Murtz wrote:
Davo wrote:
John-Melb wrote:
On Oct 23, 7:49 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
SNIP

Well, that's certainly relevant to "aus.politics.guns".

Trivial Trevor's newest, bestest friend slithers in from that place
where anti-gun ranting is acceptable but any alternative viewpoint
isn't.

It's nice to know that firearms ownership isn't the only long held
concept anti-gunners have problems with, they also have a real problem
with freedom of speech, if they don't like what you're saying.

How is Dorothy by the way Keefy?





What's the process involved in getting hold of a gun?
Can you just go in a shop and buy one?
Depends on the laws in your part of the world.

Is it legal to shoot dipshits who spew off-topic crap into
inappropriate newsgroups?

I don't think so,

Damn.

why?

Have a guess.

--
W
. | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because
\|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------

 

[Swanny]

David L. Jones wrote:

You aren't going to believe this...

I recently reviewed the new Microchip PICkit3 compared to the old PICkit2
and pretty much hammered the people responsible on behalf of those who have
found the PICkit3 upgrade rather lacking:
http://www.eevblog.com/2009/10/21/eevblog-39-pickit-3-programmerdebugger-review/

At it turns out, not surprisingly the video made it's way all around the
Microchip offices, even to the desk of their CEO.
As with any multi billion dollar corporation, I expected either deathly
silence or a nasty letter from their lawyers.

But it turns out Microchip really do care about their products and
customers, and really do listen, so they seriously took it as constructive
criticism.

So not only was my blog well received at Microchip, I got a lengthy call
from none other than the Microchip CEO Steve Sanghi, thanking me for the
blog and raising the issues. He pointed out a few factual errors which was
fair enough, but admitted they could have done the PICkit 3 better and most
importantly are working to fix the issues and give customers what they
expect.

They have even posted this hillarious video response in record time:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3YUvlrVlNao

I am absolutely blown away by their honesty and responsiveness, and it
starts from their CEO down.
Two thumbs up to Steve Sanghi and the guys and gals at Microchip!

Dave.

I belive it. I've been to Microchip in Arizona, presented at the Masters
Conference and met several of their guys (working on the dsPic
architecture). They are very responsive and open. I even had one of my
suggestions incorporated into the architecture.

 

[atec7 7]

John-Melb wrote:

On Nov 17, 11:49 am, "Trevor Wilson"
tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote:

**Me, anti-gun? Nope. I don't care about guns, one way or the other.
SNIP

That would have to be the funniest thing I've read in a very long
time.

OK, Trevor explain the 7,000 + posts you've made on gun related forums
over the past decade if you "don't care about guns"

Explain you habit of posting O/T anti-gun rants on places like
rec.audio.opinion, aus,hi-fi and aus.electronics if you "don't care
about guns"

The interesting thing is, Trevor claims he's not "anti-gun" this must
mean he's finally worked out what "anti-gun" is, took him long emough.
He's a slow learner, must be the lead thing.
Yes twevy is a slow learner

he is also an utter dick

 

[John-Melb]

On Nov 17, 11:49 am, "Trevor Wilson"
<tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote:

**Me, anti-gun? Nope. I don't care about guns, one way or the other.
SNIP

That would have to be the funniest thing I've read in a very long
time.

OK, Trevor explain the 7,000 + posts you've made on gun related forums
over the past decade if you "don't care about guns"

Explain you habit of posting O/T anti-gun rants on places like
rec.audio.opinion, aus,hi-fi and aus.electronics if you "don't care
about guns"

The interesting thing is, Trevor claims he's not "anti-gun" this must
mean he's finally worked out what "anti-gun" is, took him long emough.
He's a slow learner, must be the lead thing.

 

[Trevor Wilson]

"John-Melb" <mcnamara_john@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:532c115f-70ca-4a72-92ab-fdbbd3f4f895@i12g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 17, 11:49 am, "Trevor Wilson"
<tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote:

**Me, anti-gun? Nope. I don't care about guns, one way or the other.
SNIP

That would have to be the funniest thing I've read in a very long
time.

OK, Trevor explain the 7,000 + posts you've made on gun related forums
over the past decade if you "don't care about guns"

**Sure. I DON'T CARE ABOUT GUNS. I typed it in caps in the hope that you can
understand. I care about strong, homogeneous, well supported and policed gun
control laws.


Explain you habit of posting O/T anti-gun rants on places like
rec.audio.opinion, aus,hi-fi and aus.electronics if you "don't care
about guns"

**Asked and answered.


The interesting thing is, Trevor claims he's not "anti-gun" this must
mean he's finally worked out what "anti-gun" is, took him long emough.
He's a slow learner, must be the lead thing.

**Nope, but you sure are. Guns are not the problem. The idiot holding the
gun may well be, however. In that sense, gun control laws are very
important.


--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au

 

[kreed]

On Nov 18, 11:57 am, atec7 7 <"atec 77"@hotmail.com> wrote:

John-Melb wrote:
On Nov 17, 11:49 am, "Trevor Wilson"
tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote:

**Me, anti-gun? Nope. I don't care about guns, one way or the other.
SNIP

That would have to be the funniest thing I've read in a very long
time.

OK, Trevor explain the 7,000 + posts you've made on gun related forums
over the past decade if you "don't care about guns"

Explain you habit of posting O/T anti-gun rants on places like
rec.audio.opinion, aus,hi-fi and aus.electronics if you "don't care
about guns"

The interesting thing is, Trevor claims he's not "anti-gun" this must
mean he's finally worked out what "anti-gun" is, took him long emough.
He's a slow learner, must be the lead thing.

Yes twevy is a slow learner
he is also an utter dick

indeed

 

[the watcher]

John-Melb wrote:

On Nov 17, 11:49 am, "Trevor Wilson"
tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote:

**Me, anti-gun? Nope. I don't care about guns, one way or the other.
SNIP

That would have to be the funniest thing I've read in a very long
time.

OK, Trevor explain the 7,000 + posts you've made on gun related forums
over the past decade if you "don't care about guns"

Explain you habit of posting O/T anti-gun rants on places like
rec.audio.opinion, aus,hi-fi and aus.electronics if you "don't care
about guns"

The interesting thing is, Trevor claims he's not "anti-gun" this must
mean he's finally worked out what "anti-gun" is, took him long emough.
He's a slow learner, must be the lead thing.

you seem to be somewhat delayed yourself,this is the professional term
for beingretarded. btw. what would it be about crossposting being poor
usenet etiquette that YOU seemingly arefailing to grasp? or is this
group NOT aus.hi-fi? pot,kettle,black!!
Professionally yours
Dr Patric

 

[the watcher]

John-Melb wrote:

On Nov 18, 4:08 pm, the watcher <""coffeyman\"@out the back.com.au"
wrote:

you seem to be somewhat delayed yourself,this is the professional term
for beingretarded. btw. what would it be about crossposting being poor
usenet etiquette that YOU seemingly arefailing to grasp? or is this
group NOT aus.hi-fi? pot,kettle,black!!
Professionally yours
Dr Patric

Interesting, tell me, when Trevor Tosspot previously used aus.hi-fi to
launch his anti-gun venom and vitriol, did you complain about his
posts, or do you find them OK, and are just upset when an alternative
viewpoint appears?

After all, I do play by Tosspot's rules.

perhaps you might try usenetrules/etiquette like most of us do but as I
posted, whatever tw did,you have confirmed that as I stated in your case
it is truly sbout pot,kettle,black
DrPatric

 

[John-Melb]

On Nov 18, 2:33 pm, "Trevor Wilson" <tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au>
wrote:

"John-Melb" <mcnamara_j...@hotmail.com> wrote in message

news:532c115f-70ca-4a72-92ab-fdbbd3f4f895@i12g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 17, 11:49 am, "Trevor Wilson"

tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote:
**Me, anti-gun? Nope. I don't care about guns, one way or the other.

SNIP

That would have to be the funniest thing I've read in a very long
time.

OK, Trevor explain the 7,000 + posts you've made on gun related forums
over the past decade if you "don't care about guns"

**Sure. I DON'T CARE ABOUT GUNS. I typed it in caps in the hope that you can
understand. I care about strong, homogeneous, well supported and policed gun
control laws.

You describe gun laws which require the same level of control for
anitque pinfires as for a Luger or Colt Automatic, laws which place
muzzleloaded shotguns in a differing, harder to obtain, "category" to
breach loading shotguns, laws which based the security levels for
ammuntion not on the type or quality of ammunition, but on the licence
under which the ammunition is owned, laws which caused the destruction
of over 600,000 lawfully owned sporting firearms, but appear unable to
stop criminal gans obtaining Glocks, as "strong, homogeneous, well
supported and policed gun control laws."

Fascinating, and certainly illustrative of your ignorance of the
subject matter.

Explain you habit of posting O/T anti-gun rants on places like
rec.audio.opinion, aus,hi-fi and aus.electronics if you "don't care
about guns"

**Asked and answered.

Really, I must have missed it, care to provide a cite?

Betcha can't

The interesting thing is, Trevor claims he's not "anti-gun" this must
mean he's finally worked out what "anti-gun" is, took him long emough.
He's a slow learner, must be the lead thing.

**Nope, but you sure are. Guns are not the problem. The idiot holding the
gun may well be, however. In that sense, gun control laws are very
important.

So you still haven't worked out what "anti-gun" means in common
discussion, despite describing yourself as "not anti-gun" ? You
really do struggle with reality, dear fellow, stay away from lead for
another decade or three and things might improve for you.

"Guns are not the problem" good, I'll quote you on that........

Tell us again about your friend who can STOP his heart

--
Trevor Wilsonwww.rageaudio.com.au

 

[John-Melb]

On Nov 18, 3:43 pm, "Trevor Wilson" <tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au>
wrote:

"John-Melb" <mcnamara_j...@hotmail.com> wrote in message

news:d4c33b94-9e74-4af4-91e4-fd5c7a45b086@u36g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 18, 2:33 pm, "Trevor Wilson" <tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au
wrote:





"John-Melb" <mcnamara_j...@hotmail.com> wrote in message

news:532c115f-70ca-4a72-92ab-fdbbd3f4f895@i12g2000prg.googlegroups.com....
On Nov 17, 11:49 am, "Trevor Wilson"

tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote:
**Me, anti-gun? Nope. I don't care about guns, one way or the other.

SNIP

That would have to be the funniest thing I've read in a very long
time.

OK, Trevor explain the 7,000 + posts you've made on gun related forums
over the past decade if you "don't care about guns"

**Sure. I DON'T CARE ABOUT GUNS. I typed it in caps in the hope that you
can
understand. I care about strong, homogeneous, well supported and policed
gun
control laws.

You describe gun laws which require the same level of control for
anitque pinfires as for a Luger or Colt Automatic, laws which place
muzzleloaded shotguns in a differing, harder to obtain, "category" to
breach loading shotguns, laws which based the security levels for
ammuntion not on the type or quality of ammunition, but on the licence
under which the ammunition is owned, laws which caused the destruction
of over 600,000 lawfully owned sporting firearms, but appear unable to
stop criminal gans obtaining Glocks, as "strong, homogeneous, well
supported and policed gun control laws."

Fascinating, and certainly illustrative of your ignorance of the
subject matter.

**I did not fully describe the differences between US and Austrlian gun
control laws. You are far too stupid to understand them, so I won't bother.
The differences are profound and deep, along with very good policing of
those laws in Australia.

I was describing "Australian" gun laws you ignorant tool!

Explain you habit of posting O/T anti-gun rants on places like
rec.audio.opinion, aus,hi-fi and aus.electronics if you "don't care
about guns"

**Asked and answered.

Really, I must have missed it, care to provide a cite?

**Look up.

Betcha can't

**Moron.

Failure to provide proof of your assertions is noted, by your own
admission, this means you're lying.

The interesting thing is, Trevor claims he's not "anti-gun" this must
mean he's finally worked out what "anti-gun" is, took him long emough.
He's a slow learner, must be the lead thing.

**Nope, but you sure are. Guns are not the problem. The idiot holding the
gun may well be, however. In that sense, gun control laws are very
important.

So you still haven't worked out what "anti-gun" means in common
discussion, despite describing yourself as "not anti-gun" ?

**On the contrary, it is YOU who has failed miserably to explain what is
meant by the term: anti-gun.

But you must know what it means, you've described yourself in the same
terms

  You
really do struggle with reality, dear fellow, stay away from lead for
another decade or three and things might improve for you.

"Guns are not the problem" good, I'll quote you on that........

**Keep it in context and quote in full, moron.

Sure, "Guns are not the problem"

--
Trevor Wilsonwww.rageaudio.com.au- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

 

[John-Melb]

On Nov 18, 4:08 pm, the watcher <""coffeyman\"@out the back.com.au">
wrote:

you seem to be somewhat delayed yourself,this is the professional term
for beingretarded. btw. what would it be about crossposting being poor
usenet etiquette that YOU seemingly arefailing to grasp? or is this
group NOT aus.hi-fi? pot,kettle,black!!
Professionally yours
Dr Patric

Interesting, tell me, when Trevor Tosspot previously used aus.hi-fi to
launch his anti-gun venom and vitriol, did you complain about his
posts, or do you find them OK, and are just upset when an alternative
viewpoint appears?

After all, I do play by Tosspot's rules.

 

[John-Melb]

On Nov 18, 4:24 pm, the watcher <""coffeyman\"@out the back.com.au">
wrote:

perhaps you might try usenetrules/etiquette like most of us do but as I
posted, whatever tw did,you have confirmed that as I stated in your case
it is truly sbout pot,kettle,black
DrPatric

So, I'm correct in assuming you never complained about Trevor
Tosspot's inanae anti-gun rants appearing on aus.hi-fi but are now
sooking about alternative viewpoint on the same forum?

 

[keithr]

John-Melb wrote:

On Nov 18, 4:08 pm, the watcher <""coffeyman\"@out the back.com.au"
wrote:

you seem to be somewhat delayed yourself,this is the professional term
for beingretarded. btw. what would it be about crossposting being poor
usenet etiquette that YOU seemingly arefailing to grasp? or is this
group NOT aus.hi-fi? pot,kettle,black!!
Professionally yours
Dr Patric

Interesting, tell me, when Trevor Tosspot previously used aus.hi-fi to
launch his anti-gun venom and vitriol, did you complain about his
posts, or do you find them OK, and are just upset when an alternative
viewpoint appears?

After all, I do play by Tosspot's rules.

Which obviously makes you every bit as bad as he is. It is pure
hypocrisy to complain about trevor posting about gun politics in those
groups and then doing it your self. You and he are one and the same.

 

[John-Melb]

On Nov 18, 8:24 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:

Which obviously makes you every bit as bad as he is. It is pure
hypocrisy to complain about trevor posting about gun politics in those
groups and then doing it your self. You and he are one and the same.

Yes, Keith, you've already made it quite clear that you don't have an
issue with Trevor posting his O/T rants on aus.electronics, but get
quite upset when alternative viewpoint appears.

How is Dorothy, by the way?

 

[Bret L]

After all, I do play by Tosspot's rules.

Which obviously makes you every bit as bad as he is. It is pure
hypocrisy to complain about trevor posting about gun politics in those
groups and then doing it your self. You and he are one and the same.

R.a.o. has no on topic, everything BUT audio is fair game.

Gun control is people control, ultimately. Moreover, and more to the
point, it's about who has the guns and may do what to whom.

Gun control took over in Australia when that effectively small island
nation became in effect a vaginocracy. Female rule is the rule of
abstract notions of safety and security which are often at great
variance with reality, very especially when that reality is filtered
by the usual suspects-a media of mass information and entertainment
dedicated to the growth of big, overwhelming state control by special
interests.

John Knox wrote a diatribe in 1558 against feminocracy, and to those
of us who do not hold the tenets of Christianity as literal truth, it
may seem ridiculous today. However, in his day, Christianity was still
Western Christianity, adapted to his peculiar people, and ours (I
presume here that Australian readers are, at least overwhelmingly, of
European descent). Therefore, I believe a reading of his text will
still have some validity to us half a millennium later.

The majority of females in Australia may not have a great interest in
gun control per se one way or another: some will undoubtedly and
sensibly feel they should be allowed to carry a firearm in the cities
as protection against crime, and rural ones may even more think that
anyone in a country such as Australia, with its lethal fauna in
abundance, should be carrying an effective firearm. But that isn't the
point. Organized feminist doctrine wants men disarmed so they are at
the mercy of the Nanny State in all things, in which feminists,
sodomites, halfwits, and members of influential alien minorities have
disproportionate if not absolute control.

The feminine spirit has had disproportionate sway in Australia for
most of a century. The basic mentality is that of "cutting down the
tall poppies", of enforced egalitarianism, of an over powering
atmosphere of Scargill mentality trade unionism and a contempt of
anyone who would change the extant order for good or ill, except to
the extent those wanting change could enforce the widespread universal
propaganda that this or that particular change was really staying the
same, that keeping things as they were would really be to change even
more fundamental values.

Of course, this has propagated through the entire Western world in
much the same fashion. In my nation, or what is left of it, we fancy
ourselves the lone holdout, but that can't last forever. It has
already broken down in a great number of ways. In my opinion,
regaining manly virtue is key to our survival as a people everywhere
our people dwell.

 

[Jeßus]

In article <8225cabc-2846-45e9-8ce1-1e35eb256494
@h40g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, mcnamara_john@hotmail.com said...
:
:On Nov 18, 4:08 pm, the watcher <""coffeyman\"@out the back.com.au">
:wrote:
:
:> you seem to be somewhat delayed yourself,this is the professional term
:> for beingretarded. btw. what would it be about crossposting being poor
:> usenet etiquette that YOU seemingly arefailing to grasp? or is this
:> group NOT aus.hi-fi? pot,kettle,black!!
:> Professionally yours
:> Dr Patric
:
:Interesting, tell me, when Trevor Tosspot previously used aus.hi-fi to
:launch his anti-gun venom and vitriol, did you complain about his
osts, or do you find them OK, and are just upset when an alternative
:viewpoint appears?
:
:After all, I do play by Tosspot's rules.

You really are a fuckwit.
And I suspect, an anti-gun nut in disguise.

 

[keithr]

Jeßus wrote:

In article <8225cabc-2846-45e9-8ce1-1e35eb256494
@h40g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, mcnamara_john@hotmail.com said...
:
:On Nov 18, 4:08 pm, the watcher <""coffeyman\"@out the back.com.au"
:wrote:
:
:> you seem to be somewhat delayed yourself,this is the professional term
:> for beingretarded. btw. what would it be about crossposting being poor
:> usenet etiquette that YOU seemingly arefailing to grasp? or is this
:> group NOT aus.hi-fi? pot,kettle,black!!
:> Professionally yours
:> Dr Patric
:
:Interesting, tell me, when Trevor Tosspot previously used aus.hi-fi to
:launch his anti-gun venom and vitriol, did you complain about his
osts, or do you find them OK, and are just upset when an alternative
:viewpoint appears?
:
:After all, I do play by Tosspot's rules.

You really are a fuckwit.
And I suspect, an anti-gun nut in disguise.

You may be right, he seems hell-bent on ruining the reputation of gun
owners.

 

[keithr]

John-Melb wrote:

On Nov 18, 8:24 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:

Which obviously makes you every bit as bad as he is. It is pure
hypocrisy to complain about trevor posting about gun politics in those
groups and then doing it your self. You and he are one and the same.

Yes, Keith, you've already made it quite clear that you don't have an
issue with Trevor posting his O/T rants on aus.electronics, but get
quite upset when alternative viewpoint appears.

Yada yada yada, are you capable of more than one idea?

How is Dorothy, by the way?

Don't ask me after all it is your friend not mine.

Seek treatment now, the longer you leave it, the more your trevor
obsession will hurt you.

 

[John-Melb]

On Nov 19, 7:44 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:

John-Melb wrote:
On Nov 18, 8:24 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:

Which obviously makes you every bit as bad as he is. It is pure
hypocrisy to complain about trevor posting about gun politics in those
groups and then doing it your self. You and he are one and the same.

Yes, Keith, you've already made it quite clear that you don't have an
issue with Trevor posting his O/T rants on aus.electronics, but get
quite upset when alternative viewpoint appears.

Yada yada yada, are you capable of more than one idea?

Yes, why do you ask?

How is Dorothy, by the way?

Don't ask me after all it is your friend not mine.

You raised mention of Dorothy before me

Seek treatment now, the longer you leave it, the more your trevor
obsession will hurt you.

And you medical qualifications for recommending "treatment" are?

 

[Mickel]

"What The" <none@none.com> wrote in message
news:8_7Mm.55236$ze1.3010@news-server.bigpond.net.au...

Anyone in Sydney have one of these kicking around. Need to erase some old
27C512 chips (so it doesn't need to be huge) and don't feel like paying
$25 out of china along with the 1 week wait for something that i imagine
may be collecting dust on your bookcase.

Use that big bright ball in the sky, it's free even if it is a bit slow.

Michael