PRC as a amplifier in GPS question.

"-=Spudley=-" <-=Spudley=-@work.com> wrote in message
news:1PUqk.29858$IK1.4985@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
Will you please try to keep up.
First, top posting is bad form.

Second, the comment was attributed to Peter in the reply.

Frankly you need to keep up.

Peter was challenging the reply attributing the comment to him when he
didn't say it.

Look at the post Peter replied to. Although you don't seem to know enough
about usenet to figure it out.
 
Iain Churches wrote:

"Eeyore" wrote

Well I haven't done anything yet. And if Philthy cleans up his act I
won't.

Surely your "deadline" has long passed Graham?
Your posts are starting to look a little vacuous.
The deadline to modify his behaviour. I'm not a meanie. I haven't (yet)
seen any more cancer or death threats.

Besides, these things don't usually happen overnight (except one notorious
example which had the abuse crowd baying for my blood).

Graham
 
bassett wrote:

"Eeyore" wrote

Ah. Wars. I thought the previous poster had the Empire more in mind.

Talking of War's As far as Phillie's conserned, It might be time for him
to capitulate, and go and live on Macquarie island. well away from the
Internet. As his fate is sealed, according to some.

Meanwhile Graham, is issueing Tin Hats and the troops are in the trenches,
awaiting the impending confruntation of Good over Evil.

He will Go, He won't.
He's on his last warning, [that was 5 years ago] Phil wait's for a full
moon, to repel borders, on the ship of fools. He must change, he won't. It
might be easer to get him to change his socks.
He will be nice to everyone, He can't , he dosen't know how.

But like a lot of people I wish you would hurry up, it's getting cold,
standing out here attempting to protect
peace and harmany.

I,m sorry Graham, but somehow me thinks you have shot yourself in the foot.
Oh I doubt it. There are to date only 2 serious abusers I've failed to 'nick'
and besides, both have pretty much shut up now. Both use far cleverer ways of
covering their tracks than Philthy does.

Graham
 
Arny Krueger wrote:

"Eeyore" wrot

Name ONE country we 'raped'.

Three...

What is now known as The United States Of America
Raped ? In what way ? Might I draw your attention to how you treated
your own indigenous population ?


Oh, that assortment of moghul territories and mini kingdoms we turned
into a nation state and introduced democracy to. We built the Indian
Parliament around 1912 or so IIRC. Yup, that was rape for sure


South Africa
Cite ? I think you'll find the Boers were the beastly ones.

Graham
 
keithr wrote:

"Arny Krueger" wrote
"Eeyore" wrote

Name ONE country we 'raped'.

Three...

What is now known as The United States Of America

Nope, and in any case the British only ever had possession of a small part
of what is now called The United States Of America.
Exactly. The French had bits too.


Their successors now
known as Americans did a far more efficient job of raping the rest of it.

India

Yes but the original rulers were doing an effective job long before

South Africa

Not really, they did a much better job in other parts of Africa.

...immediately come to mind.

History and geography are not really strong subjects in America are they?
I'd love to see an American history book. They must get these ideas from
somewhere.

The way the British treated their colonies, dominions etc is well demonstrated
by the continuing existence of the Commonwealth of Nations which has recently
even accepted one former non-British territory. There are are over 50 members
IIRC.

Graham
 
Iain Churches wrote:

"keithr" wrote in

History and geography are not really strong subjects in America are they?

Living in "darkest Detroit", Arny, has probably never
visited either India or S.Africa, and so do not know the
high level of esteem in which the British are held there.
The Indians are great fun and usually very sociable. Just be careful doing
business with them though.

Graham
 
"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:48AC3431.D781A344@hotmail.com...
bassett wrote:

"Eeyore" wrote

Ah. Wars. I thought the previous poster had the Empire more in mind.

Talking of War's As far as Phillie's conserned, It might be time for
him
to capitulate, and go and live on Macquarie island. well away from the
Internet. As his fate is sealed, according to some.

Meanwhile Graham, is issueing Tin Hats and the troops are in the
trenches,
awaiting the impending confruntation of Good over Evil.

He will Go, He won't.
He's on his last warning, [that was 5 years ago] Phil wait's for a full
moon, to repel borders, on the ship of fools. He must change, he won't.
It
might be easer to get him to change his socks.
He will be nice to everyone, He can't , he dosen't know how.

But like a lot of people I wish you would hurry up, it's getting cold,
standing out here attempting to protect
peace and harmany.

I,m sorry Graham, but somehow me thinks you have shot yourself in the
foot.

Oh I doubt it. There are to date only 2 serious abusers I've failed to
'nick'
and besides, both have pretty much shut up now. Both use far cleverer ways
of
covering their tracks than Philthy does.

Graham

Whatever the outcome, I give you high marks for trying. We've become
accustomed to a debased usenet, accustomed to rudeness, accustomed to evil.

It's bad to become accustomed to bad things.

Bob Morein
(310) 237-6511
 
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 16:25:44 +0100, Eeyore wrote:


The way the British treated their colonies, dominions etc is well demonstrated
by the continuing existence of the Commonwealth of Nations which has recently
even accepted one former non-British territory. There are are over 50 members
IIRC.
Which country is that?
Membership of the Commonwealth is basically in the hands of the pollies
and have you ever known them to give up any excuse for a jolly?

As they say here;
You are a beaut,
We the salute,
Elizabeth the last.
 
Soundhaspriority wrote:

"Eeyore" wrote
bassett wrote:
"Eeyore" wrote

Ah. Wars. I thought the previous poster had the Empire more in mind.

Talking of War's As far as Phillie's conserned, It might be time for
him to capitulate, and go and live on Macquarie island. well away from the

Internet. As his fate is sealed, according to some.

Meanwhile Graham, is issueing Tin Hats and the troops are in the
trenches, awaiting the impending confruntation of Good over Evil.

He will Go, He won't.
He's on his last warning, [that was 5 years ago] Phil wait's for a full
moon, to repel borders, on the ship of fools. He must change, he won't.
It might be easer to get him to change his socks.
He will be nice to everyone, He can't , he dosen't know how.

But like a lot of people I wish you would hurry up, it's getting cold,
standing out here attempting to protect
peace and harmany.

I,m sorry Graham, but somehow me thinks you have shot yourself in the
foot.

Oh I doubt it. There are to date only 2 serious abusers I've failed to
'nick' and besides, both have pretty much shut up now. Both use far cleverer
ways
of covering their tracks than Philthy does.

Graham

Whatever the outcome, I give you high marks for trying. We've become
accustomed to a debased usenet, accustomed to rudeness, accustomed to evil.

It's bad to become accustomed to bad things.
I totally agree

Graham

p.s. I checked it wasn't from Buzzard this time !
 
terryc wrote:

On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 16:25:44 +0100, Eeyore wrote:

The way the British treated their colonies, dominions etc is well demonstrated
by the continuing existence of the Commonwealth of Nations which has recently
even accepted one former non-British territory. There are are over 50 members
IIRC.

Which country is that?
Mozambique.


Membership of the Commonwealth is basically in the hands of the pollies
and have you ever known them to give up any excuse for a jolly?
It serves its purpose.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commonwealth_of_Nations

Graham
 
"keithr" <keithr@nowhere.com.au> wrote in message
news:48ac04f7$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au
"Arny Krueger" <arnyk@hotpop.com> wrote in message
news:n6adnUTeE-fObjbVnZ2dnUVZ_qfinZ2d@comcast.com...
"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote
in message news:48AB3363.A1D24B5B@hotmail.com

Name ONE country we 'raped'.

Three...

What is now known as The United States Of America

Nope, and in any case the British only ever had
possession of a small part of what is now called The
United States Of America.
You're avoiding the obvious point - the reason for our Revolutionary War was
was that the British were raping us. The British continued rape us, and we
had the war of 1812. The British continued to rape us and helped precipitate
our war between the states.

India

Yes but the original rulers were doing an effective job
long before
Thanks for agreeing that the British raped India.

South Africa

Not really,
Yes, really.

they did a much better job in other parts of Africa.
That too, but I thought that all I had to do is list one. My list of 3
stands without effective criticism.

...immediately come to mind.

History and geography are not really strong subjects in
America are they?
Indict yourself if you wish, since you either basically agreed with me, or
made a irrelevant argument. I could say the same thing based on the
statement by the British citizen who claimed that the British have never
ever raped not even one country.

One of the problems with people who live in second-rate countries like the
UK is that they don't appreciate the complexities of life in the rather
large and complex country that is still *The* world power. It is composed of
50 states, many of which are each larger in terms of geographic size,
economic power, complex political and social life, and population than just
about any of the other countries of the world. Just keeping track of *that*
is more than enough for most ordinary mortals.
 
"Iain Churches" <IainNG@kolumbus.fi> wrote in message
news:Z4Vqk.53004$_03.7222@reader1.news.saunalahti.fi
"keithr" <keithr@nowhere.com.au> wrote in message

Living in "darkest Detroit", Arny, has probably never
visited either India or S.Africa, and so do not know the
high level of esteem in which the British are held there.
Since millions of citizens of India and 100s of thousands of citizens of
South Africa live in the US, I don't have to go very far to converse with
them, and thus I know how they think. Just ask anybody of Dutch descent
about their *pleasure* with the British military adventures in South Africa
at their expense.

I note that those *lovely places* called "Concentration Camps" were invented
by the British during their attempt to suppress personal liberties in South
Africa. Talk about covering yourself with glory in the pages of history!

This is in stark contrast to Vietnam where tourists
are advised to wear a T-shirt on which is written
in Vietnamese. "I am not an American"
So what if they are still sore about the fact that we did indeed bomb them
back into the stone age, as promised. I can imagine the laughter if Finland
made that threat.

I have travelled (sic) extensively in all three countries.
Obviously Ian, you didn't learn very much from the experience. Old dogs, new
tricks, and all that. ;-)
 
"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:48AC3778.6B793F59@hotmail.com...
I'd love to see an American history book. They must get these ideas from
somewhere.
The Scandinavian nations in general seem to hold the US
in rather low esteem. There are often comparisons in the
Swedish press of American and Scandinavian educational
systems, social policies, salary levels, political structure,
etc etc.

In most instances, the US comes out very badly. It seems
that the US Bachelor degree is at roughly the same
academic level as the Swedish school leavers' certificate.
A gem that made me chuckle was the disclosure that
60% of American high-school students thought that
Joan of Arc was Noah's wife:)

While most Scandinavians are fluent in two or more
languages (more difficult than English) some areas of the
US have a 47% illiteracy rate, and many millions of
Americans don't have a bank account because the
use of an ATM is too complex for them!

It seems to that a large percentage of Americans did
not know how many states make up the US .
Even Barack Obama thought there were 57!

In addition only 26% of American high-school
students knew anything at all about the EU, and only
a tiny percentage knew how many nations comprised
the European Union. Not one of those interviewed
could name them all (25 at the time) In view of the
alarming lack of general knowledge, and to avoid
dragging the average percentage of correct answers
into single figures, the question "How many of the
EU member nations belong to NATO?" was not asked.

Worrying?

I wear with pride the tee-shirt, given out by the
hotel in Saigon, on which is written in Vietnamese
"I am not an American" :)


Iain
 
"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote in
message news:48AC3778.6B793F59@hotmail.com
keithr wrote:

"Arny Krueger" wrote
"Eeyore" wrote

Name ONE country we 'raped'.

Three...

What is now known as The United States Of America

Nope, and in any case the British only ever had
possession of a small part of what is now called The
United States Of America.

Exactly. The French had bits too.
You've both missed the point.

Our response to the British ongoing attempts to rape us ended up causing two
direct wars and an indirect one, all of which we won.

India

Yes but the original rulers were doing an effective job
long before
Doesn't change the fact that the British raped them.

South Africa

Not really, they did a much better job in other parts of
Africa.
Doesn't change the fact that the British raped them.


...immediately come to mind.

History and geography are not really strong subjects in
America are they?

I'd love to see an American history book. They must get
these ideas from somewhere.
Thanks for admitting that you know very little about American history or
geography.

The way the British treated their colonies, dominions etc
is well demonstrated by the continuing existence of the
Commonwealth of Nations which has recently even accepted
one former non-British territory. There are over 50
members IRC.
Those are the weak and/or lazy ones who lacked what it took to put the
British raping to an end in a timely fashion.
 
"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote in
message news:48AC3648.31740115@hotmail.com

Arny Krueger wrote:

"Eeyore" wrote

Name ONE country we 'raped'.

Three...

What is now known as The United States Of America

Raped ? In what way ?
"no taxation without representation".

It took 3 wars with the British for us to make our point, two direct and one
via a proxy known as "The Confederate States Of America". We won all 3.

Might I draw your attention to how
you treated your own indigenous population ?
I have never claimed that the US were a bunch of choir boys. In fact we are
currently the most successfully blood-thirsty lot in the world, and have
been that way for at least 60 years.

India

Oh, that assortment of moghul territories and mini
kingdoms we turned into a nation state and introduced
democracy to. We built the Indian Parliament around 1912
or so IIRC. Yup, that was rape for sure
Tell that to Ghandi. ;-)

South Africa

Cite ?
The various relevant writings of say, Winston Churchill.

And you talk about how little U.S. citizens know about history? GMAB!

I think you'll find the Boers were the beastly
ones.
Oh come on now, it is well known that the British tried to rape South Africa
for their diamonds.
 
"Iain Churches" <IainNG@kolumbus.fi> wrote in message
news:IP_qk.53199$_03.43684@reader1.news.saunalahti.fi
"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote
in message news:48AC3778.6B793F59@hotmail.com...



I'd love to see an American history book. They must get
these ideas from somewhere.


The Scandinavian nations in general seem to hold the US
in rather low esteem.
It is known as "Ankle Biting".

There are often comparisons in the
Swedish press of American and Scandinavian educational
systems, social policies, salary levels, political
structure, etc etc.
More ankle biting.

Most of the smarter, more industrious Scandinavians emigrated to the US
decades ago. Who cares what those laggards that are left behind think?
 
Arny Krueger wrote:

I note that those *lovely places* called "Concentration Camps" were invented
by the British during their attempt to suppress personal liberties in South
Africa. Talk about covering yourself with glory in the pages of history!
Fundmanentally no different to the camps you put your Japanese citizens in
during WW2. Except I don't think we confiscated their property too.

Graham
 
Arny Krueger wrote:

Just ask anybody of Dutch descent about their *pleasure* with the British
military adventures in South Africa at their expense.
The main 'second' Boer War was started by the Boers (the Dutch) and they
eventually lost.

"First, the Boers mounted pre-emptive strikes into British-held territory in
Natal and the Cape Colony, besieging the British garrisons of Ladysmith,
Mafeking and Kimberley"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Boer_War

I don't know anyone of Dutch descent living here who holds anti-British views.
They're generally very friendly.

Graham
 
Arny Krueger wrote:

"Eeyore" wrote
keithr wrote:

"Arny Krueger" wrote
"Eeyore" wrote

Name ONE country we 'raped'.

Three...

What is now known as The United States Of America

Nope, and in any case the British only ever had
possession of a small part of what is now called The
United States Of America.

Exactly. The French had bits too.

You've both missed the point.

Our response to the British ongoing attempts to rape us ended up causing two
direct wars and an indirect one, all of which we won.
In which way did we sexually abuse you ?

Graham
 
Arny Krueger wrote:

"Eeyore" wrote
keithr wrote:

History and geography are not really strong subjects in
America are they?

I'd love to see an American history book. They must get
these ideas from somewhere.

Thanks for admitting that you know very little about American history or
geography.
I bet I know a lot more about it than you do about British history.


The way the British treated their colonies, dominions etc
is well demonstrated by the continuing existence of the
Commonwealth of Nations which has recently even accepted
one former non-British territory. There are over 50
members IRC.

Those are the weak and/or lazy ones who lacked what it took to put the
British raping to an end in a timely fashion.
And they loved being 'raped' so much that they joined a mutual club to celebrate
it. Yes, that makes sense. Maybe Mozambique was hoping they'd get raped too if
they joined, even though they'd never been a British colony ?

Graham
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top