PRC as a amplifier in GPS question.

[Eeyore]

David Segall wrote:

Eeyore wrote:
David Segall wrote:
Closing his account because he has been rude to you seems like petty
revenge. Kill file him and forget him.

He's been doing this for YEARS.

He WILL stop or he won't be on the net. That's a promise. I've taken on far
harder nuts than him and they've had their legs chopped off from beneath them.

I more or less killed off the 'meow wars' for example. See wikipedia. Website
owners that allow their facilities to be used for abuse don't like being woken
up at 4 a.m. for one thing.

I've even had anonymisers 'cut' accounts. Talking one-to-one with the tech
staff also works wonders.
If you insist on wasting your great, self-proclaimed and oft-repeated
skills to suppress Phil's rants I can't stop you. However, I believe
it would be much easier for you and everyone else if you just kill
file him. You do know how to do that don't you?

I don't WANT to killfile him since many of his posts are of excellent quality. It's
only as the thread rambles on usually that it descends into darkness.

At the point in time I have NO ONE killfiled. I like to hear all opinions, even
some of the dafter ones. Some are a total scream.

Graham

 

[Eeyore]

Moi wrote:

What is this Graham's problem? He seems rather pompous and cocksure of
himself

Experience. And a damn good tutor. You know how hunters often have the heads of
their prey stuffed ? Shame I can't do the same.

At the height of the meow trying to destroy a group I posted to I could issue
around 50 abuse reports in an evening. That was tops though.

Graham

 

[Eeyore]

"Michael A. Terrell" wrote:

Moi wrote:

What is this Graham's problem? He seems rather pompous and cocksure of
himself (he knows 'excatly what [he's] doing' (wihs I always did but I am
human...)... And perhaps obsessive... OK, we've all suffered from Phil. Just
killfile him when he gets too much, and provided not too many blokes reply
and quote him, life will be much easier!

He's British, and doesn't believe that England no longer rules the
known world. He doesn't accept that they don't own the United States,
and many other countries they raped over the years.

Name ONE country we 'raped'.

He is a simple
little troll, nothing more. A lot of people on the sci.electronics.*
newsgroups have him and Phil kill filed to lower the noise floor.

Interesting that the 2 Johns are now chatting with me again. And I much enjoy
their comments.

I will add that I had been receiving poor (IMHO) medical treatment (I now have a
complete copy of my medical records) and my mood is now much milder after a long
sought change in some medication. I am actually considering a civil case against
the doctors involved. Funding it will be the problem. Maybe I can get a no win no
fee agreement ?

Graham

 

[Soundhaspriority]

"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:48AB21F1.A9F94362@hotmail.com...

Soundhaspriority wrote:

"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote in message

Graham, not to embarass you, but you responded to McCarty:

Path:
border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!post01.iad01!news.buzzardnews.com!not-for-mail
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.4.0.080122
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:24:14 +1000
Subject: Re: aus.Re: DI 101?
From: Soundhaspriority <nowhere@nowhere.c

I am not your critic; I'm rooting for you. It is true that in the case of
Phil Allison, the law is difficult. In the case of McCarty, there
actually
is law.

Oh you mean I got caught out by your imposter ? Damn !

Graham

Smile

I sent you email. Watch out for forgeries in that mode as well.

Bob Morein
(310) 237-6511

 

[Eeyore]

Soundhaspriority wrote:

"Eeyore" wrote
Soundhaspriority wrote:
"Eeyore" wrote

Graham, not to embarass you, but you responded to McCarty:

Path:
border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!post01.iad01!news.buzzardnews.com!not-for-mail
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.4.0.080122
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:24:14 +1000
Subject: Re: aus.Re: DI 101?
From: Soundhaspriority <nowhere@nowhere.c

I am not your critic; I'm rooting for you. It is true that in the case of
Phil Allison, the law is difficult. In the case of McCarty, there
actually
is law.

Oh you mean I got caught out by your imposter ? Damn !

Graham

Smile

I sent you email. Watch out for forgeries in that mode as well.

Got it. Very interesting if not altogther bemusing !

Graham

 

[Peter Larsen]

Eeyore wrote:

Name ONE country we 'raped'.

There was this issue of the Congreve rocket attack on Copenhagen ... it was
not called for and not required to reach the objective of neutralizing the
danish fleet so that it could not end up on Napoleons side. However to be
fair you - as a nation - did apologize indirectly via your effors in the
Vienna conference when we had what is technically known as A problem with
Schleswig later than century and in your support of the resolution of the
Schleswig border problem via a vote after The Great War and recently
directly.

When you - ie. Britain - went after the french navy in WW2 - they might have
been well off having read their history books with greater care, they would
quite possibly have given up if they had remebered Copenhagen. As for the
tactic as well as strategic necessity of both naval seizures, no contest, it
was an obviously required step for your nations survival.

Graham

Kind regards

Peter Larsen

 

[-=Spudley=-]

"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:48A9E0DA.3965C2C@hotmail.com...

Peter Larsen wrote:

Eeyore wrote:

May I suggest you read some of the recent correspondence between

Just that was what prompted my comments.

Sorry Peter but you're a million miles out of touch with reality.

Graham

Quite possibly it was this response of yours to Phil that prompted Peter to
comment. "You're not only a foul-mouthed shit, you're also an idiot."

 

[Peter Larsen]

-=Spudley=- wrote:

Quite possibly it was this response of yours to Phil that prompted
Peter to comment. "You're not only a foul-mouthed shit, you're also
an idiot."

I made no such comment.

Peter Larsen

 

[bassett]

Well we all await the outcome, but getting rid of Phillie, has been tried
before, and apart from a few lapse's where he disappeared for a week or so,
He's here, and here to stay.

So unless you have some secret formula, I think your drawing a very long
bow, When you say you will remove him.

As has been suggested, just do as the rest of us do and simply "kilfile" the
little bugger.

But like all things "time will tell"

And as I said before, Attempting to regulate who posts and who dosen't post
on a public unmoderated newsgroup, is impossable to control. regardless of
what you might know, or what you think you might know.
But we all wish you well in your endeavours

bassett

 

[keithr]

"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:48AB3363.A1D24B5B@hotmail.com...

"Michael A. Terrell" wrote:

Moi wrote:

What is this Graham's problem? He seems rather pompous and cocksure of
himself (he knows 'excatly what [he's] doing' (wihs I always did but I
am
human...)... And perhaps obsessive... OK, we've all suffered from Phil.
Just
killfile him when he gets too much, and provided not too many blokes
reply
and quote him, life will be much easier!

He's British, and doesn't believe that England no longer rules the
known world. He doesn't accept that they don't own the United States,
and many other countries they raped over the years.

Name ONE country we 'raped'.

How about China during the opium war? It is the only time that I know of
that a country has declared war on another in order to protect it's "Rights"
to push hard drugs against that county's wishes.

 

[Moi]

"keithr" <keithr@nowhere.com.au> wrote in message
news:48abb214$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au...

"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:48AB3363.A1D24B5B@hotmail.com...


"Michael A. Terrell" wrote:

Moi wrote:

What is this Graham's problem? He seems rather pompous and cocksure of
himself (he knows 'excatly what [he's] doing' (wihs I always did but I
am
human...)... And perhaps obsessive... OK, we've all suffered from
Phil. Just
killfile him when he gets too much, and provided not too many blokes
reply
and quote him, life will be much easier!

He's British, and doesn't believe that England no longer rules the
known world. He doesn't accept that they don't own the United States,
and many other countries they raped over the years.

Name ONE country we 'raped'.

How about China during the opium war? It is the only time that I know of
that a country has declared war on another in order to protect it's
"Rights" to push hard drugs against that county's wishes.
Actually, I am British too, though the past was beyond my control. (BTW,

and a neutralised <g> Australian to boot (or is that to thong?)). I don't
think it's his Britishness that does this. The arrogance is more like
America! There, I've stirred the pot now! Having said that, there are many
Americans I admire... and then again there are many I do NOT! Graham keeps
on declaring that he knows what he's doing, just you wait and see, etc. But
nothing! It's become a bit of an obsession with him. Not healthy,
obsessions. Most of us have become frustrated with Phil but now and then he
gives really good information. I killfiled him long ago to get rid of the
abuse, only to see his post quoted numerous times by others!

 

[Eeyore]

bassett wrote:

Well we all await the outcome, but getting rid of Phillie, has been tried
before, and apart from a few lapse's where he disappeared for a week or so,
He's here, and here to stay.

So unless you have some secret formula,

Yes.

I think your drawing a very long
bow, When you say you will remove him.

As has been suggested, just do as the rest of us do and simply "kilfile" the
little bugger.

But like all things "time will tell"

And as I said before, Attempting to regulate who posts and who dosen't post
on a public unmoderated newsgroup, is impossable to control. regardless of
what you might know, or what you think you might know.
But we all wish you well in your endeavours

Thank you.

Graham

 

[Eeyore]

Moi wrote:

"keithr" wrote
"Eeyore" wrote in message
"Michael A. Terrell" wrote:
Moi wrote:

What is this Graham's problem? He seems rather pompous and cocksure of
himself (he knows 'excatly what [he's] doing' (wihs I always did but I
am human...)... And perhaps obsessive... OK, we've all suffered from
Phil. Just killfile him when he gets too much, and provided not too many
blokes
reply and quote him, life will be much easier!

He's British, and doesn't believe that England no longer rules the
known world. He doesn't accept that they don't own the United States,
and many other countries they raped over the years.

Name ONE country we 'raped'.

How about China during the opium war? It is the only time that I know of
that a country has declared war on another in order to protect it's
"Rights" to push hard drugs against that county's wishes.
Actually, I am British too, though the past was beyond my control. (BTW,
and a neutralised <g> Australian to boot (or is that to thong?)). I don't
think it's his Britishness that does this. The arrogance is more like
America! There, I've stirred the pot now! Having said that, there are many
Americans I admire... and then again there are many I do NOT! Graham keeps
on declaring that he knows what he's doing, just you wait and see, etc. But
nothing!

Well I haven't done anything yet. And if Philthy cleans up his act I won't.

It's become a bit of an obsession with him. Not healthy,
obsessions. Most of us have become frustrated with Phil but now and then he
gives really good information. I killfiled him long ago to get rid of the
abuse, only to see his post quoted numerous times by others!

Which is why the other method is more effective.

Graham

 

[Eeyore]

Peter Larsen wrote:

Eeyore wrote:

Name ONE country we 'raped'.

There was this issue of the Congreve rocket attack on Copenhagen ... it was
not called for and not required to reach the objective of neutralizing the
danish fleet so that it could not end up on Napoleons side. However to be
fair you - as a nation - did apologize indirectly via your effors in the
Vienna conference when we had what is technically known as A problem with
Schleswig later than century and in your support of the resolution of the
Schleswig border problem via a vote after The Great War and recently
directly.

When you - ie. Britain - went after the french navy in WW2 - they might have
been well off having read their history books with greater care, they would
quite possibly have given up if they had remebered Copenhagen. As for the
tactic as well as strategic necessity of both naval seizures, no contest, it
was an obviously required step for your nations survival.

Ah. Wars. I thought the previous poster had the Empire more in mind.

Graham

 

[Iain Churches]

"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:48ABC4C8.D36A282D@hotmail.com...

Well I haven't done anything yet. And if Philthy cleans up his act I
won't.

Surely your "deadline" has long passed Graham?
Your posts are starting to look a little vacuous.

Iain

 

[bassett]

"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:48ABC560.A9077198@hotmail.com...

Peter Larsen wrote:

Eeyore wrote:

Name ONE country we 'raped'.

There was this issue of the Congreve rocket attack on Copenhagen ... it
was
not called for and not required to reach the objective of neutralizing
the
danish fleet so that it could not end up on Napoleons side. However to be
fair you - as a nation - did apologize indirectly via your effors in the
Vienna conference when we had what is technically known as A problem with
Schleswig later than century and in your support of the resolution of the
Schleswig border problem via a vote after The Great War and recently
directly.

When you - ie. Britain - went after the french navy in WW2 - they might
have
been well off having read their history books with greater care, they
would
quite possibly have given up if they had remebered Copenhagen. As for the
tactic as well as strategic necessity of both naval seizures, no contest,
it
was an obviously required step for your nations survival.

Ah. Wars. I thought the previous poster had the Empire more in mind.

Graham

Talking of War's As far as Phillie's conserned, It might be time for him
to capitulate, and go and live on Macquarie island. well away from the
Internet. As his fate is sealed, according to some.

Meanwhile Graham, is issueing Tin Hats and the troops are in the trenches,
awaiting the impending confruntation of Good over Evil.

He will Go, He won't.
He's on his last warning, [that was 5 years ago] Phil wait's for a full
moon, to repel borders, on the ship of fools. He must change, he won't. It
might be easer to get him to change his socks.
He will be nice to everyone, He can't , he dosen't know how.

But like a lot of people I wish you would hurry up, it's getting cold,
standing out here attempting to protect
peace and harmany.

I,m sorry Graham, but somehow me thinks you have shot yourself in the foot.

bassett

 

[Arny Krueger]

"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote in
message news:48AB3363.A1D24B5B@hotmail.com

Name ONE country we 'raped'.

Three...

What is now known as The United States Of America

India

South Africa

....immediately come to mind.

 

[keithr]

"Arny Krueger" <arnyk@hotpop.com> wrote in message
news:n6adnUTeE-fObjbVnZ2dnUVZ_qfinZ2d@comcast.com...

"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote in
message news:48AB3363.A1D24B5B@hotmail.com

Name ONE country we 'raped'.

Three...

What is now known as The United States Of America

Nope, and in any case the British only ever had possession of a small part
of what is now called The United States Of America. Their successors now
known as Americans did a far more efficient job of raping the rest of it.

India

Yes but the original rulers were doing an effective job long before

South Africa

Not really, they did a much better job in other parts of Africa.

...immediately come to mind.

History and geography are not really strong subjects in America are they?

Keith

 

[-=Spudley=-]

Will you please try to keep up.


"Peter Larsen" <digilyd@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:48ab8530$0$56782$edfadb0f@dtext02.news.tele.dk...

-=Spudley=- wrote:

Quite possibly it was this response of yours to Phil that prompted
Peter to comment. "You're not only a foul-mouthed shit, you're also
an idiot."

I made no such comment.

Peter Larsen

 

[Iain Churches]

"keithr" <keithr@nowhere.com.au> wrote in message
news:48ac04f7$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au...

"Arny Krueger" <arnyk@hotpop.com> wrote in message
news:n6adnUTeE-fObjbVnZ2dnUVZ_qfinZ2d@comcast.com...
"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote in
message news:48AB3363.A1D24B5B@hotmail.com

Name ONE country we 'raped'.

Three...

What is now known as The United States Of America

Nope, and in any case the British only ever had possession of a small part
of what is now called The United States Of America. Their successors now
known as Americans did a far more efficient job of raping the rest of it.

India

Yes but the original rulers were doing an effective job long before

South Africa

Not really, they did a much better job in other parts of Africa.

...immediately come to mind.

History and geography are not really strong subjects in America are they?

Keith

Living in "darkest Detroit", Arny, has probably never
visited either India or S.Africa, and so do not know the
high level of esteem in which the British are held there.

This is in stark contrast to Vietnam where tourists
are advised to wear a T-shirt on which is written
in Vietnamese. "I am not an American"

I have travelled extensively in all three countries.


Iain