PRC as a amplifier in GPS question.

[Eeyore]

Phil Allison wrote:

"Eeysore the INSANE TROLL"

** Pedantic twaddle.

Just like every insane thing the Stevenson TROLL posts.

BEHAVE !

** You are totally insane.

Do the planet a favour - go top yourself.

Do you REALLY want that abuse report ?

** Fair comment is no abuse - you pathetic fool.

" go top yourself." is not fair comment.

It is in breach of your ISP and news server's terms and condirions. And I
intend to ensure they apply them to you.

I have posted the relevant sections for your perusal. You are also
probably in breach of German and Australian Law. In view of your
residence in Australia, contined abuse could easily result in a criminal
action against you.

Graham

 

[Eeyore]

Phil Allison wrote:

"Eeysore the INSANE TROLL"

** You are totally insane.

Do the planet a favour - go top yourself.

http://www.telstra.com.au/global/terms/index.shtml

** I have no account with Telstra.

Then I'll find out who it is.

Mind you, doesn't Telstra supply the copper wires to the home ? That means
by default you have to observe their TOS, whoever the ISP is.

Graham

 

[Joe Kotroczo]

On 18/08/08 0:59, in article g8aafa$5dv$1@aioe.org, "liquidator"
<mikeh@mad.scientist.com> wrote:

(...)

I had made an assumption that we Americans copied them from you Brits,
since back then they were not common here.

Wiki seems to think they are American

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldfish_(snack)

Which begs the question how did they show up in a British SF novel prior to
being common here? Perhaps Doug Adams could portend the future?

Copied from the Germans, I think. At least I remember seeing the German ones
back when I was a little kid.

http://www.goldfischli.de/

--
Joe Kotroczo kotroczo@mac.com

 

[atec77]

Eeyore wrote:

atec77 wrote

Ritz , not to keen on them at all

Try them with some soft cheese.

Graham


What don't you get about DONT LIKE "EM ?

nothing is going to make me either

 

[atec77]

Eeyore wrote:

atec77 wrote:

Eeyore wrote:
atec77 wrote:

I dislike most fish products thanks
You're missing so much !
Nah , considering each mouthfull is laden with poisons I think not

Last food trouble I got was from chicken I think.

Graham


Dont usually eat soft white things either

steak however in moderation

 

[Eeyore]

Phil Allison wrote:

"Eeysore the INSANE TROLL"

** You are totally insane.

Do the planet a favour - go top yourself.

http://www.telstra.com.au/global/terms/index.shtml

** I have no account with Telstra.

Then I'll find out who it is.

Why are you cross posting your replies to me ?

THAT IS ABUSE !!

You haven't the tiniest clue what you're talking about.

Graham

 

[Eeyore]

Phil Allison wrote:

"Eeysore the INSANE TROLL"

** Pedantic twaddle.

Just like every insane thing the Stevenson TROLL posts.

BEHAVE !

** You are totally insane.

Do the planet a favour - go top yourself.

Do you REALLY want that abuse report ?

** Fair comment is no abuse - you pathetic fool.

" go top yourself." is not fair comment.

** It is not "abuse" nor a breach of any law.

Yes it is. It is a threatening speech.

It IS a common insult - you pathetic fool.

Only in your demented mind.

OTOH - what YOU are now doing is a serious crime.

You're quite MAD.

Graham

 

[Eeyore]

Phil Allison wrote:

"Eeysore the INSANE TROLL"

Why are you cross posting your replies to me ?

THAT IS ABUSE !!

You are truly clueless.

You deserve to be taken off usenet. Your warning period has expired. I
shall start taking abuse prevention measures soon.

Graham

 

[Eeyore]

atec77 wrote:

Eeyore wrote:
atec77 wrote

Ritz , not to keen on them at all

Try them with some soft cheese.

What don't you get about DONT LIKE "EM ?
nothing is going to make me either

Oh. THAT 'not keen'. OK !

Graham

 

[Eeyore]

Phil Allison wrote:

"Eeysore the INSANE TROLL"

Why are you cross posting your replies to me ?

THAT IS ABUSE !!

You are truly clueless.

** Can't answer the question - can you ????

Can't answer ANY of my questions - can you ???

You're not only a foul-mouthed shit, you're also an idiot.

I suggest you read the TOS and AUP of your providers and acquaint
yourself with the law.

Graham

 

[David Segall]

Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:

David Segall wrote:

Eeyore wrote:
Phil Allison wrote:

** No.

When do you want the abuse report sent ?

Everyone is getting totally sick of you.
I'm not! Phil usually posts prompt, helpful, literate replies to
questions in aus.electronics.

On a good day.

Clearly you're not familiar with his more normal behaviour like wishing
you get cancer and die a painful death.


His occasional rants are easy to skip

Not when he targets me amongst others.
I have been the subject of a Phil rant and I'm sure almost every other

poster has too. What Phil wishes is unlikely to hurt you although I
have to admit I am offended by his persistent misuse of the word
"troll".

He always includes his
name in the subject line so you can add him to your kill file and
achieve the same result without disadvantaging those of us who value
his advice.

Sorry, sunshine, Phil's gone too far. His behaviour is inexcusable and if
it doesn't stop he'll be an ever sadder git with no internet connection.
Probably ever again. The ISPs do talk to each other you know.

One word. Netiquette.
Poor etiquette, including netiquette, deserves a rebuke the first time

and avoiding the offender if that does not work. It hardly merits the
death penalty. That should be reserved for posters who sell imitation
Rolex watches, pretend to be another poster, persistently avoid a kill
file or cancel other peoples posts.

Closing his account because he has been rude to you seems like petty
revenge. Kill file him and forget him.

 

[Peter Larsen]

Eeyore wrote:

Users may not use the Telstra Network in order to transmit, distribute
or store material:.........c)
that is obscene, threatening, abusive or hateful or contains a virus,
worm, Trojan horse, or other harmful component.

That applies to YOU Philthy.

Graham, you have been quite threatening and attempted to intimidate in your
recent posts regarding Phil and thereby made your own case a lot less solid
than it might appear to be. You can complain or make it a feud, but quite
possibly not both.

Graham

Kind regards

Peter Larsen

 

[Eeyore]

David Segall wrote:

Eeyore wrote:
David Segall wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
Phil Allison wrote:

** No.

When do you want the abuse report sent ?

Everyone is getting totally sick of you.
I'm not! Phil usually posts prompt, helpful, literate replies to
questions in aus.electronics.

On a good day.

Clearly you're not familiar with his more normal behaviour like wishing
you get cancer and die a painful death.

His occasional rants are easy to skip

Occasional ? They are the norm.

Not when he targets me amongst others.
I have been the subject of a Phil rant and I'm sure almost every other
poster has too. What Phil wishes is unlikely to hurt you although I
have to admit I am offended by his persistent misuse of the word
"troll".

It might hurt if you're feeling vulnerable for any reason. What is beyond
doubt is that is in flagrant abuse of his telecom, ISP and news provider's
terms plus usually criminal law.

He always includes his
name in the subject line so you can add him to your kill file and
achieve the same result without disadvantaging those of us who value
his advice.

Sorry, sunshine, Phil's gone too far. His behaviour is inexcusable and if
it doesn't stop he'll be an ever sadder git with no internet connection.
Probably ever again. The ISPs do talk to each other you know.

One word. Netiquette.
Poor etiquette, including netiquette, deserves a rebuke the first time

I suspect he's had more than one 'first time'.

and avoiding the offender if that does not work. It hardly merits the
death penalty. That should be reserved for posters who sell imitation
Rolex watches, pretend to be another poster, persistently avoid a kill
file or cancel other peoples posts.

25 year mandatory sentences and confiscation of all property would fix that.

Closing his account because he has been rude to you seems like petty
revenge. Kill file him and forget him.

He's been doing this for YEARS.

He WILL stop or he won't be on the net. That's a promise. I've taken on far
harder nuts than him and they've had their legs chopped off from beneath them.

I more or less killed off the 'meow wars' for example. See wikipedia. Website
owners that allow their facilities to be used for abuse don't like being woken
up at 4 a.m. for one thing.

I've even had anonymisers 'cut' accounts. Talking one-to-one with the tech
staff also works wonders.

Graham

 

[Soundhaspriority]

"Peter Larsen" <digilyd@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:48a9c56e$0$56787$edfadb0f@dtext02.news.tele.dk...

Eeyore wrote:

Users may not use the Telstra Network in order to transmit, distribute
or store material:.........c)
that is obscene, threatening, abusive or hateful or contains a virus,
worm, Trojan horse, or other harmful component.

That applies to YOU Philthy.

Graham, you have been quite threatening and attempted to intimidate in
your recent posts regarding Phil and thereby made your own case a lot less
solid than it might appear to be. You can complain or make it a feud, but
quite possibly not both.

Graham

Kind regards

Peter Larsen

Peter, I think Graham is trying behavior modification before pulling the

trigger on Phil. It's actually more humane.

Bob Morein
(310) 237-6511

 

[Eeyore]

Peter Larsen wrote:

Eeyore wrote:

Users may not use the Telstra Network in order to transmit, distribute
or store material:.........c)
that is obscene, threatening, abusive or hateful or contains a virus,
worm, Trojan horse, or other harmful component.

That applies to YOU Philthy.

Graham, you have been quite threatening and attempted to intimidate in your
recent posts regarding Phil and thereby made your own case a lot less solid
than it might appear to be. You can complain or make it a feud, but quite
possibly not both.

Please advise where I have ever been abusive to Phil (where it was not a
response in kind - and I don't lower myself to his level of wishing painful
cancers to people for sure). I try to humour him sometimes in order to avoid
his rants but to little effect often.

I can assure you that I DO have a substantial track record of abuse removal.
Whether that involves acccount cancellation or a change in the attitude of the
offending poster I really don't mind. It's up to them. I am a VERY reasonable
person.

Graham

 

[Eeyore]

Eeyore wrote:

David Segall wrote:

Closing his account because he has been rude to you seems like petty
revenge. Kill file him and forget him.

He's been doing this for YEARS.

Oh, and not just to me. To EVERYONE.

He probably needs locking up in a psychiatric ward.

Graham

 

[Eeyore]

Soundhaspriority wrote:

"Peter Larsen" <digilyd@hotmail.com> wrote
Eeyore wrote:

Users may not use the Telstra Network in order to transmit, distribute
or store material:.........c)
that is obscene, threatening, abusive or hateful or contains a virus,
worm, Trojan horse, or other harmful component.

That applies to YOU Philthy.

Graham, you have been quite threatening and attempted to intimidate in
your recent posts regarding Phil and thereby made your own case a lot less
solid than it might appear to be. You can complain or make it a feud, but
quite possibly not both.

Graham

Kind regards

Peter Larsen

Peter, I think Graham is trying behavior modification before pulling the
trigger on Phil. It's actually more humane.

Bob Morein

It seems to have worked in aapl-s.

Graham

 

[Peter Larsen]

Eeyore wrote:

Please advise where I have ever been abusive to Phil (where it was
not a response in kind

You can not use foul language and/or manners and complain over its use
simultanously - you then become part of the problem. "Response in kind" is
not a valid reason, imo you have weakened the points you can make and it
would be possible to make the point against a complaint from you that you
had previously provoked.

Graham

Kind regards

Peter Larsen

 

[Eeyore]

Peter Larsen wrote:

Eeyore wrote:

Users may not use the Telstra Network in order to transmit, distribute
or store material:.........c)
that is obscene, threatening, abusive or hateful or contains a virus,
worm, Trojan horse, or other harmful component.

That applies to YOU Philthy.

Graham, you have been quite threatening and attempted to intimidate in your
recent posts regarding Phil and thereby made your own case a lot less solid
than it might appear to be. You can complain or make it a feud, but quite
possibly not both.

Thank you but I know EXACTLY what I'm doing.

I have been very reasonable yet Philthy continues to abuse all and sundry
contrary to the laws of his land, his news provider's land and the Terms of
Service and Acceptable Use Policies of both.

You want to tbe his mentor ? Fine by me.

Graham

 

[Eeyore]

Peter Larsen wrote:

Eeyore wrote:

Please advise where I have ever been abusive to Phil (where it was
not a response in kind

You can not use foul language and/or manners and complain over its use
simultanously - you then become part of the problem.

I DO NOT use profoundly foul language. I may be critical of Phil but I DO NOT
descend to his levels of profanity. Nor do I wish anyone dies painful deaths
from cancer (despite the fact that both my parents did so by the time I was
18).

"Response in kind" is
not a valid reason, imo you have weakened the points you can make and it
would be possible to make the point against a complaint from you that you
had previously provoked.

May I suggest you read some of the recent correspondence between Philthy and
me ?

If you can't see it for yourself, maybe someone else can help you. ?

Graham