Plimer and Silicon Chip

Bill Sloman wrote:
On Oct 10, 8:33 pm, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...@earthlink.net
wrote:
Phil Allison wrote:

"Michael A. Terrell Retarded Looney "

** The Russians built and flew their own planes against the German
invasion - tens of thousand of them.

Your claims are utter crap.

What is a 'invasion'? They only buit a small percentage of the planes,
when compared to what the US supplied.

** Massive FUCKING lie !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Go eat shit you vile, septic MOTHERFUCKER !!

Are you ever going to grow up and admit your mistakes? You changed
the word from 'vasion' to 'invasion'. You don't fool anyone, except
yourself. You and Bill Slomanmake Australians look like raving fools.

Since Michael Terrell obviously doesn't know about the Stormvik ground
attack aircraft,

http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_stormovik.html

of which the Russians built 36,000 - more than the 21,000 planes they
got from the USA - he would seem to be a better candidate for the
raving fool position.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1385548/posts

His claims about the absence of high octane aviation fule in Europe in
WW2 are also represent another area of ignorance on his part - he
obviously doesn't know about "cracking" heavy crude to produce lower
molecular weight hydrocarbons to be sold as gasoline - a process that
was originally invented before 1900, and was in general use before
WW2.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cracking_(chemistry)
Click to expand...

Bill, get a fucking life.


--
The movie 'Deliverance' isn't a documentary!
 
"Bill Slowman"
"Phil Allison"
"Michael A. Terrell Retarded Looney "
** The Russians built and flew their own planes against the German
invasion - tens of thousand of them.

Your claims are utter crap.

What is a 'invasion'? They only buit a small percentage of the planes,
when compared to what the US supplied.

** Massive FUCKING lie !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Go eat shit you vile, septic MOTHERFUCKER !!

Are you ever going to grow up and admit your mistakes? You changed
the word from 'vasion' to 'invasion'. You don't fool anyone, except
yourself. You and Bill Slomanmake Australians look like raving fools.
Click to expand...
Since Michael Terrell obviously doesn't know about the Stormvik ground
attack aircraft,

http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_stormovik.html

of which the Russians built 36,000 - more than the 21,000 planes they
got from the USA - he would seem to be a better candidate for the
raving fool position.


** The Russians built well over 160,000 combat planes during WW2.

Egs:

36,000 Il-2s ( Stormoviks)

37,000 Lag 5,7, 9 & 11 fighters

37,000 Yak 1,3, 7 & 9 fighters.

11,400 Pe-2 and Pe-3 bombers

and many other types in numbers of around 5000 or so.


His claims about the absence of high octane aviation fule in Europe in
WW2 are also represent another area of ignorance on his part...
Click to expand...

** That was not the actual claim.

It was far stupider than that.


.... Phil
 
Michael A. Terrell wrote:
Bill Sloman wrote:

On Oct 10, 8:33 pm, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...@earthlink.net
wrote:
Phil Allison wrote:

"Michael A. Terrell Retarded Looney "

** The Russians built and flew their own planes against the
German invasion - tens of thousand of them.

Your claims are utter crap.

What is a 'invasion'? They only buit a small percentage of the
planes, when compared to what the US supplied.

** Massive FUCKING lie !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Go eat shit you vile, septic MOTHERFUCKER !!

Are you ever going to grow up and admit your mistakes? You
changed the word from 'vasion' to 'invasion'. You don't fool
anyone, except yourself. You and Bill Slomanmake Australians look
like raving fools.

Since Michael Terrell obviously doesn't know about the Stormvik
ground attack aircraft,

http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_stormovik.html

of which the Russians built 36,000 - more than the 21,000 planes they
got from the USA - he would seem to be a better candidate for the
raving fool position.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1385548/posts

His claims about the absence of high octane aviation fule in Europe
in WW2 are also represent another area of ignorance on his part - he
obviously doesn't know about "cracking" heavy crude to produce lower
molecular weight hydrocarbons to be sold as gasoline - a process that
was originally invented before 1900, and was in general use before
WW2.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cracking_(chemistry)

Bill, get a fucking life.
Click to expand...
LOL. He posts facts to counteract your bullshit so you tell him to get a
life.
That hole you're digging for yourself is getting deeper.

Your actions remind me why we here in Australia call Americans "Seppos".
Seppo (short for Septic Tanks) is rhyming slang for Yanks.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhyming_slang
The term fits you to a tee because, like a septic tank, you're full of piss
and shit!

--
Dyna

All rights reserved. All wrongs avenged.
 
Dyna Soar wrote:
Michael A. Terrell wrote:
Bill Sloman wrote:

On Oct 10, 8:33 pm, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...@earthlink.net
wrote:
Phil Allison wrote:

"Michael A. Terrell Retarded Looney "

** The Russians built and flew their own planes against the
German invasion - tens of thousand of them.

Your claims are utter crap.

What is a 'invasion'? They only buit a small percentage of the
planes, when compared to what the US supplied.

** Massive FUCKING lie !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Go eat shit you vile, septic MOTHERFUCKER !!

Are you ever going to grow up and admit your mistakes? You
changed the word from 'vasion' to 'invasion'. You don't fool
anyone, except yourself. You and Bill Slomanmake Australians look
like raving fools.

Since Michael Terrell obviously doesn't know about the Stormvik
ground attack aircraft,

http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_stormovik.html

of which the Russians built 36,000 - more than the 21,000 planes they
got from the USA - he would seem to be a better candidate for the
raving fool position.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1385548/posts

His claims about the absence of high octane aviation fule in Europe
in WW2 are also represent another area of ignorance on his part - he
obviously doesn't know about "cracking" heavy crude to produce lower
molecular weight hydrocarbons to be sold as gasoline - a process that
was originally invented before 1900, and was in general use before
WW2.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cracking_(chemistry)

Bill, get a fucking life.

LOL. He posts facts to counteract your bullshit so you tell him to get a
life.
That hole you're digging for yourself is getting deeper.

Your actions remind me why we here in Australia call Americans "Seppos".
Seppo (short for Septic Tanks) is rhyming slang for Yanks.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhyming_slang
The term fits you to a tee because, like a septic tank, you're full of piss
and shit!
Click to expand...

Yawn. Sloman is a joke on the other electronics newsgroups.

--
The movie 'Deliverance' isn't a documentary!
 
Phil Allison wrote:
"Bill Slowman"
"Phil Allison"
"Michael A. Terrell Retarded Looney "

** The Russians built and flew their own planes against the German
invasion - tens of thousand of them.

Your claims are utter crap.

What is a 'invasion'? They only buit a small percentage of the planes,
when compared to what the US supplied.

** Massive FUCKING lie !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Go eat shit you vile, septic MOTHERFUCKER !!

Are you ever going to grow up and admit your mistakes? You changed
the word from 'vasion' to 'invasion'. You don't fool anyone, except
yourself. You and Bill Slomanmake Australians look like raving fools.

Since Michael Terrell obviously doesn't know about the Stormvik ground
attack aircraft,

http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_stormovik.html

of which the Russians built 36,000 - more than the 21,000 planes they
got from the USA - he would seem to be a better candidate for the
raving fool position.

** The Russians built well over 160,000 combat planes during WW2.

Egs:

36,000 Il-2s ( Stormoviks)

37,000 Lag 5,7, 9 & 11 fighters

37,000 Yak 1,3, 7 & 9 fighters.

11,400 Pe-2 and Pe-3 bombers

and many other types in numbers of around 5000 or so.

His claims about the absence of high octane aviation fule in Europe in
WW2 are also represent another area of ignorance on his part...

** That was not the actual claim.

It was far stupider than that.

.... Phil
Click to expand...

Tell me, Phil. How may missions did you fly for the Russians in
WW-II? If zero, you have no clue as to what the pilots thought of the
planes they flew.


--
The movie 'Deliverance' isn't a documentary!
 
Michael A. Terrell wrote:
Dyna Soar wrote:

Your actions remind me why we here in Australia call Americans
"Seppos". Seppo (short for Septic Tanks) is rhyming slang for Yanks.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhyming_slang
The term fits you to a tee because, like a septic tank, you're full
of piss and shit!

Yawn. Sloman is a joke on the other electronics newsgroups.
Click to expand...
Whatever, you're still full of piss and shit.

--
Dyna

All rights reserved. All wrongs avenged.
 
"Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message
news:7jf35vF34qt1vU1@mid.individual.net...


**Nor is anything in the hands of the most rapid gun nutter.
Click to expand...
That should read: ".....most RABID gun nutter."


--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au
 
On Oct 12, 5:54 am, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...@earthlink.net>
wrote:
Dyna Soar wrote:

Michael A. Terrell wrote:
Bill Slomanwrote:

On Oct 10, 8:33 pm, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...@earthlink.net
wrote:
Phil Allison wrote:

 "Michael A. Terrell Retarded Looney "

** The Russians built and flew their own planes against the
German invasion   - tens of thousand of them.

   Your claims are utter crap.

  What is a 'invasion'?  They only buit a small percentage of the
planes, when compared to what the US supplied.

 ** Massive  FUCKING   lie  !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 Go eat shit you vile,  septic  MOTHERFUCKER  !!

   Are you ever going to grow up and admit your mistakes?  You
changed the word from 'vasion' to 'invasion'.  You don't fool
anyone, except yourself.  You and Bill Slomanmake Australians look
like raving fools.

Since Michael Terrell obviously doesn't know about the Stormvik
ground attack aircraft,

http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_stormovik.html

of which the Russians built 36,000 - more than the 21,000 planes they
got from the USA - he would seem to be a better candidate for the
raving fool position.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1385548/posts

His claims about the absence of high octane aviation fule in Europe
in WW2 are also represent another area of ignorance on his part - he
obviously doesn't know about "cracking" heavy crude to produce lower
molecular weight hydrocarbons to be sold as gasoline - a process that
was originally invented before 1900, and was in general use before
WW2.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cracking_(chemistry)

  Bill, get a fucking life.

LOL.  He posts facts to counteract your bullshit so you tell him to get a
life.
That hole you're digging for yourself is getting deeper.

Your actions remind me why we here in Australia call Americans "Seppos"..
Seppo (short for Septic Tanks) is rhyming slang for Yanks.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhyming_slang
The term fits you to a tee because, like a septic tank, you're full of piss
and shit!

  Yawn.  Sloman is a joke on the other electronics newsgroups.
Click to expand...
Terrell is a right-wing brown-nose on sci.electronics.design. The
people whom he brown-noses don't like factual corrections either, so
they aren't fond of me, and Mike parrots some of their sillier claims.

--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
 
On 2009-10-10, Michael A. Terrell <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:
Jasen Betts wrote:

On 2009-10-09, Michael A. Terrell <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:

So, you are a greedy, ungrateful bastard. It was supplied, at cost to
Allied nations. Our entire manufacturing infrastructure was converted
to the war effort, and millions of American citizens did with what they
needed, to make sure the military of Allied nations got the supplies
they needed. No new tires, very little gasoline. Food rationing, very
few new clothes, shoes or other items available, because the raw
materials were diverted to the war. Then most of the 'Allies'
conveniently forgot to pay for their share of the cost for freedom.

I can't say that that would have impressed any of those who were
actually doing the fighting

The you don't seem to get is the other allies made greater sacrifices.

Cites? Show proof.
Click to expand...
USA 0.32% killed
UK 0.94%
NZ 0.73%
AUS 0.57%
Canada 0.4%
India 0.43%
China ~2-3%
USSR 14.18%
Poland 16%
 
On 2009-10-11, KR <kenreed1999@gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 11, 3:33 pm, "Mr.T" <MrT@home> wrote:
"Davo" <D...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:4acec021$1_6@news.peopletelecom.com.au...

It's only the deterrent effect of having America standing behind us that
Australia hasn't been invaded by other countries. Australia wouldn't
stand a chance on its own. It's cool to be anti-establishment but
totally unrealistic to think we don't depend on America for our
security. China would be here in a flash otherwise.

Bollocks. New Zealand pissed off the yanks when they banned nuclear war
ships and reduced military co-operation. Nobody invaded them.
(Australia continued to be "invaded" by New Zealanders though :)

MrT.


AFAIK, NZ hasn't got a defense force at all.
Click to expand...
hasn't got much of a defense force,
no fighter planes, main battle tanks, or ships larger than frigates.

total force 12409 personnel
http://www.nzdf.mil.nz/at-a-glance/personnel-composition.htm

14658 is about 0.3% of total population

currently about 780 serving overseas.

Im told that its an extremely hard place to invade to start with
Click to expand...
several thousand kilometers of sea will slow most people down,
and then there's the accent :)
 
On Oct 12, 8:05 am, "Trevor Wilson" <tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au>
wrote:
"Mr.T" <MrT@home> wrote in message

news:4ad161a7$0$3253$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...



"Roger Dewhurst" <dewhu...@wave.co.nz> wrote in message
news:haou2p$5ip$2@lust.ihug.co.nz...
Your politicians have effectively disarmed the populace!!!!!!!! Silly
buggers.

Single shot rifles are no match for nuclear weapons in any case.

**Nor is anything in the hands of the most rapid gun nutter. American gun
nutters fail to recognise this simple point. Against the most ancient
technology, still in active service in the US military (B-52 Bombers - ca
1952), civilans have zero defence. Hell, even some very well equipped
military forces have no defence against them.

Guns, in the hands of civilians are simply no match for a well equipped,
well trained military force.

--
Trevor Wilsonwww.rageaudio.com.au
Click to expand...
No, but they can make a big difference to any survivors for self
defense, if law and order breaks down, and / or enemy ground forces
try to invade what is left.

Then again, if you nuke something, its debatable as to what is left.
 
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 23:55:15 -0400, Michael A. Terrell wrote:


Tell me, Phil. How may missions did you fly for the Russians in
WW-II? If zero, you have no clue as to what the pilots thought of the
planes they flew.
Click to expand...
Wow, you claim to have talked to old Russian pilots now.
 
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 21:13:19 -0400, Michael A. Terrell wrote:

terryc wrote:

On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 20:26:13 -0400, Michael A. Terrell wrote:

Oh, you want me to point to "the truth" as written by the USA armed
forces? Hell, even your own WWII veteran piss all over "the official
history".

Have you ever talked to any US W.W.II Veterans?

Yes, that is why I could make the comment.

Once again, you snipped most of the message.
Click to expand...
Shrug, you asked a question and I replied. Is "english" not your first
language or didn't they teach you any basic sentence construction?
 
On Oct 12, 8:14 pm, Jasen Betts <ja...@xnet.co.nz> wrote:
On 2009-10-11, KR <kenreed1...@gmail.com> wrote:



On Oct 11, 3:33 pm, "Mr.T" <MrT@home> wrote:
"Davo" <D...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:4acec021$1_6@news.peopletelecom.com.au...

It's only the deterrent effect of having America standing behind us that
Australia hasn't been invaded by other countries. Australia wouldn't
stand a chance on its own. It's cool to be anti-establishment but
totally unrealistic to think we don't depend on America for our
security. China would be here in a flash otherwise.

Bollocks. New Zealand pissed off the yanks when they banned nuclear war
ships and reduced military co-operation. Nobody invaded them.
(Australia continued to be "invaded" by New Zealanders though :)

MrT.

AFAIK, NZ hasn't got a defense force at all.

hasn't got much of a defense force,
no fighter planes, main battle tanks, or ships larger than frigates.

total force 12409 personnelhttp://www.nzdf.mil.nz/at-a-glance/personnel-composition.htm

14658 is about 0.3% of total population

currently about 780 serving overseas.

Im told that its an extremely hard place to invade to start with

several thousand kilometers of sea will slow most people down,
and then there's the accent :)
Click to expand...

Hm, maybe they would invade to get their hands on some really hot sexy
sheep ? ;).
Hm, then again only New Zealanders and Armenians (according to
Russians) fuck sheep.

New Zealanders don't have to invade their own country, and I doubt
Armenia could bother.
Too tied up with the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict anyway.

If the women there look anything like that Helen Clark, I cant blame
them.
 
John - Melb wrote:

And none of the other precious darlings on aus.electronics seem to
have a problem with it ?
Click to expand...
I have a problem with any off-topic postings, but don't have the paranoia
about it that you do.

While do you even bother reading this group when you make absolutely no
posts about electronics? We know the answer, of course, it's your obsession
with Wilson. I have news for you, he just ain't worth it.

--
Dyna

All rights reserved. All wrongs avenged.
 
On Oct 12, 9:05 am, "Trevor Wilson" <tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au>
wrote:
"Mr.T" <MrT@home> wrote in message

news:4ad161a7$0$3253$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...



"Roger Dewhurst" <dewhu...@wave.co.nz> wrote in message
news:haou2p$5ip$2@lust.ihug.co.nz...
Your politicians have effectively disarmed the populace!!!!!!!!  Silly
buggers.

Single shot rifles are no match for nuclear weapons in any case.

**Nor is anything in the hands of the most rapid gun nutter. American gun
nutters fail to recognise this simple point. Against the most ancient
technology, still in active service in the US military (B-52 Bombers - ca
1952), civilans have zero defence. Hell, even some very well equipped
military forces have no defence against them.

Guns, in the hands of civilians are simply no match for a well equipped,
well trained military force.

--
Trevor Wilsonwww.rageaudio.com.au
Click to expand...
Still using aus.electronics to launch your anti-gun rants I see
Trevor.

What is a "rapid(sic) gun nutter" be precise in your answer

Actually Trevor, "the most ancient military technology" still in
active service with the US military is probably the .50 M2 HB Browning
machine gun (circa 1919).

I really do find the way you display your ignorance on matters you
pontiifcate about so very entertaining.

Tell us again about your friend who can STOP his heart.
 
And none of the other precious darlings on aus.electronics seem to
have a problem with it ?
 
On Oct 13, 12:06 pm, John - Melb <mcnamara_j...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 13, 11:28 am, "Dyna  Soar"

dynasoar..REMOVE..THI...@ozdebate.com> wrote:
John - Melb wrote:
And none of the other precious darlings on aus.electronics seem to
have a problem with it ?

I have a problem with any off-topic postings, but don't have the paranoia
about it that you do.

While do you even bother reading this group when you make absolutely no
posts about electronics?  We know the answer, of course, it's your obsession
with Wilson.  I have news for you, he just ain't worth it.

Why do other posters on aus.electronics not have a problem with
Trivial Trevor's O/T anti-gun and anti-gunowner rants, but go feral
when an alternative viewpoint appears?

I'm pretty sure I know the answer to that one too........



--
Dyna

All rights reserved. All wrongs avenged.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
----------------------------------------------------------
Click to expand...
Hey Dyna, from APG
On Sep 26, 10:28 pm, John - Melb <mcnamara_j...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sep 25, 5:45 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:

Put it somewhere else trevor, otherwise you'll have your alter ego and
his little mates from APG swarming all over the place again.-


Sorry Keefy, too late.

It's interesting to note that Keefy isn't concerned about Trevor's
anti-gun rants appearing on aus.electronics, he's concerned that an
alternative viewpoint may appear.

Doesn't surprise me in the least
----------------------------------------------------------------
Click to expand...
 
On Oct 13, 11:28 am, "Dyna Soar"
<dynasoar..REMOVE..THI...@ozdebate.com> wrote:
John - Melb wrote:
And none of the other precious darlings on aus.electronics seem to
have a problem with it ?

I have a problem with any off-topic postings, but don't have the paranoia
about it that you do.

While do you even bother reading this group when you make absolutely no
posts about electronics?  We know the answer, of course, it's your obsession
with Wilson.  I have news for you, he just ain't worth it.
Click to expand...
Why do other posters on aus.electronics not have a problem with
Trivial Trevor's O/T anti-gun and anti-gunowner rants, but go feral
when an alternative viewpoint appears?

I'm pretty sure I know the answer to that one too........

--
Dyna

All rights reserved. All wrongs avenged.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top