Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Err,I took that to mean percentage of population or troops.Total = 35.57 to 36.57% Where are the rest?
Common knowledge that you don't appear to have been able to access.Bill Slomanwrote:
Terrell is a right-wing brown-nose on sci.electronics.design. The
people whom he brown-noses don't like factual corrections either, so
they aren't fond of me, and Mike parrots some of their sillier claims.
Bill posts common knowledge, while pretending that its a closely held
state secret.
Mike is - of course - unemployed for health reasons. His winsomeHe is an unemployable old loser with a huge chip on his shoulder.
Ayup. SED is crawling with wingnut Yanks - something we can do withoutOn Oct 12, 5:54 am, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...@earthlink.net
wrote:
Dyna Soar wrote:
Michael A. Terrell wrote:
Bill Slomanwrote:
On Oct 10, 8:33 pm, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...@earthlink.net
wrote:
Phil Allison wrote:
"Michael A. Terrell Retarded Looney "
** The Russians built and flew their own planes against the
German invasion - tens of thousand of them.
Your claims are utter crap.
What is a 'invasion'? They only buit a small percentage of the
planes, when compared to what the US supplied.
** Massive FUCKING lie !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Go eat shit you vile, septic MOTHERFUCKER !!
Are you ever going to grow up and admit your mistakes? You
changed the word from 'vasion' to 'invasion'. You don't fool
anyone, except yourself. You and Bill Slomanmake Australians look
like raving fools.
Since Michael Terrell obviously doesn't know about the Stormvik
ground attack aircraft,
http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_stormovik.html
of which the Russians built 36,000 - more than the 21,000 planes they
got from the USA - he would seem to be a better candidate for the
raving fool position.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1385548/posts
His claims about the absence of high octane aviation fule in Europe
in WW2 are also represent another area of ignorance on his part - he
obviously doesn't know about "cracking" heavy crude to produce lower
molecular weight hydrocarbons to be sold as gasoline - a process that
was originally invented before 1900, and was in general use before
WW2.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cracking_(chemistry)
Bill, get a fucking life.
LOL. He posts facts to counteract your bullshit so you tell him to get a
life.
That hole you're digging for yourself is getting deeper.
Your actions remind me why we here in Australia call Americans "Seppos".
Seppo (short for Septic Tanks) is rhyming slang for Yanks.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhyming_slang
The term fits you to a tee because, like a septic tank, you're full of piss
and shit!
Yawn. Sloman is a joke on the other electronics newsgroups.
Terrell is a right-wing brown-nose on sci.electronics.design. The
people whom he brown-noses don't like factual corrections either, so
they aren't fond of me, and Mike parrots some of their sillier claims.
Michael A. Terrell wrote:
keithr wrote:
Michael A. Terrell wrote:
terryc wrote:
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 06:25:22 -0400, Michael A. Terrell wrote:
terryc wrote:
On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 13:29:07 -0400, Michael A. Terrell wrote:
Phil Allison wrote:
"Michael A. Terrell Retarded Looney "
The Russians, using American built planes and supplies.
** The Yanks supplied Russia with inferior fighter planes ( P39s)
that no American wanted to fly against the Japanese or Germans. Gave
a few of them to black US pilots to fly too.
Women flew them, too. Big deal.
So you are confirming that USAian males think their women are lesser
people.
See? You have to attack everything. That was not what I said.
But it is. Someone suggested the the planes SOLD, not given, to the USSR
were substandard planes in the view of white pilots, but black pilots
were still required to fly them. To which you joined they were also
"flown" by women. Now you are attempting weasel out by saying you ddn't
mean flown (as in fighting), but "flown" as in transfer flights.
The point was that they were flown by more than the Russians.
You still have to provide that evidence.
Prove that they weren't. Our pilots were trained in anything that
flew, including crop dusters to free up the best planes for use
overseas. The planes sent to Russia were a lot better than what was
used to train our pilots. Some leaned to fly in patched together
biplanes
The vast majority of WWII pilots of all nations trained in biplanes.
And you think the warplanes the US supplied were worse?
Did the US supply biplanes then? In fact it was a British biplane that
crippled the Bismarck leading to its destruction.
Heres some more info on the Russian lend-lease
http://lend-lease.airforce.ru/english/articles/geust/aircraft_deliveries.htm
Returning military who lost everything they owned, and
came home penniless, only to be told the government couldn't and
wouldn't honor the promises made when they enlisted, or were drafted?
Having the president order the military to shoot Veterans who refused to
leave the capital?
sounds kind-of self inflicted.
I stated that it came from a US refinery. What other process isOn Oct 13, 4:04 am, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...@earthlink.net
wrote:
Bill Slomanwrote:
Terrell is a right-wing brown-nose on sci.electronics.design. The
people whom he brown-noses don't like factual corrections either, so
they aren't fond of me, and Mike parrots some of their sillier claims.
Bill posts common knowledge, while pretending that its a closely held
state secret.
Common knowledge that you don't appear to have been able to access.
He is an unemployable old loser with a huge chip on his shoulder.
Mike is - of course - unemployed for health reasons. His winsome
personality doesn't come into it. I'm 66 which means that I'm retired,
rather than unemployed. You were unemployed for years, before you 'retired'.
Ayup. SED is crawling with wingnut Yanks - something we can do without
in this *Australian* group.
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 22:05:30 -0400, Michael A. Terrell wrote:
terryc wrote:
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 23:55:15 -0400, Michael A. Terrell wrote:
Tell me, Phil. How may missions did you fly for the Russians in
WW-II? If zero, you have no clue as to what the pilots thought of
the planes they flew.
Wow, you claim to have talked to old Russian pilots now.
Where did I say that? Are you on the same drugs as Phil?
Well, it seems you are. You asked Phil if he'd ever flown for the
Russians in WWII. Was that an admission that you are talking out your
arse?
Other countries have - and had - refineries. You get a better yield ofBill Slomanwrote:
On Oct 13, 4:04 am, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...@earthlink.net
wrote:
Bill Slomanwrote:
Terrell is a right-wing brown-nose on sci.electronics.design. The
people whom he brown-noses don't like factual corrections either, so
they aren't fond of me, and Mike parrots some of their sillier claims.
Bill posts common knowledge, while pretending that its a closely held
state secret.
Common knowledge that you don't appear to have been able to access.
I stated that it came from a US refinery. What other process is
used?
Which must be a relief to your former co-workers.He is an unemployable old loser with a huge chip on his shoulder.
Mike is - of course - unemployed for health reasons. His winsome
personality doesn't come into it. I'm 66 which means that I'm retired,
rather than unemployed. You were unemployed for years, before you 'retired'.
Yawn. The VA has stated that I CAN NEVER WORK AGAIN.
And we can understand why you can't find anybody to share it.They haven't stopped me from doing volunteer work on the days I'm able to
leave MY house.
I take it that is an admission that I am correct on this point.terryc wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 22:05:30 -0400, Michael A. Terrell wrote:
terryc wrote:
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 23:55:15 -0400, Michael A. Terrell wrote:
Tell me, Phil. How may missions did you fly for the Russians
in
WW-II? If zero, you have no clue as to what the pilots thought of
the planes they flew.
Wow, you claim to have talked to old Russian pilots now.
Where did I say that? Are you on the same drugs as Phil?
Well, it seems you are. You asked Phil if he'd ever flown for the
Russians in WWII. Was that an admission that you are talking out your
arse?
That's your specialty, like all low grade trolls.
"We"?Bob Larter wrote:
Ayup. SED is crawling with wingnut Yanks - something we can do without
in this *Australian* group.
No more than we can do about the clueless trolls on any newsgroup.
On Oct 16, 10:50 pm, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...@earthlink.net
wrote:
Bill Slomanwrote:
On Oct 13, 4:04 am, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...@earthlink.net
wrote:
Bill Sloman wrote:
Terrell is a right-wing brown-nose on sci.electronics.design. The
people whom he brown-noses don't like factual corrections either, so
they aren't fond of me, and Mike parrots some of their sillier claims.
Bill posts common knowledge, while pretending that its a closely held
state secret.
Common knowledge that you don't appear to have been able to access.
I stated that it came from a US refinery. What other process is
used?
Other countries have - and had - refineries. You get a better yield of
high octane gasolene from light crude than you do from heavy crude,
but there was nothing magical about US oil.
He is an unemployable old loser with a huge chip on his shoulder.
Mike is - of course - unemployed for health reasons. His winsome
personality doesn't come into it. I'm 66 which means that I'm retired,
rather than unemployed. You were unemployed for years, before you 'retired'.
Yawn. The VA has stated that I CAN NEVER WORK AGAIN.
Which must be a relief to your former co-workers.
They haven't stopped me from doing volunteer work on the days I'm able to
leave MY house.
And we can understand why you can't find anybody to share it.
On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 16:51:06 -0400, Michael A. Terrell wrote:
Bob Larter wrote:
Ayup. SED is crawling with wingnut Yanks - something we can do without
in this *Australian* group.
No more than we can do about the clueless trolls on any newsgroup.
"We"?
On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 16:51:45 -0400, Michael A. Terrell wrote:
terryc wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 22:05:30 -0400, Michael A. Terrell wrote:
terryc wrote:
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 23:55:15 -0400, Michael A. Terrell wrote:
Tell me, Phil. How may missions did you fly for the Russians
in
WW-II? If zero, you have no clue as to what the pilots thought of
the planes they flew.
Wow, you claim to have talked to old Russian pilots now.
Where did I say that? Are you on the same drugs as Phil?
Well, it seems you are. You asked Phil if he'd ever flown for the
Russians in WWII. Was that an admission that you are talking out your
arse?
That's your specialty, like all low grade trolls.
I take it that is an admission that I am correct on this point.
Having the combination of ignorance and arrogance is what setsterryc wrote:
On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 16:51:45 -0400, Michael A. Terrell wrote:
terryc wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 22:05:30 -0400, Michael A. Terrell wrote:
terryc wrote:
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 23:55:15 -0400, Michael A. Terrell wrote:
Tell me, Phil. How may missions did you fly for the Russians
in
WW-II? If zero, you have no clue as to what the pilots thought of
the planes they flew.
Wow, you claim to have talked to old Russian pilots now.
Where did I say that? Are you on the same drugs as Phil?
Well, it seems you are. You asked Phil if he'd ever flown for the
Russians in WWII. Was that an admission that you are talking out your
arse?
That's your specialty, like all low grade trolls.
I take it that is an admission that I am correct on this point.
No, but you'll claim it anyway. Your ignorance and arrogance won't
let you do anything else.
Michael A. Terrell wrote:
terryc wrote:
On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 16:51:45 -0400, Michael A. Terrell wrote:
terryc wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 22:05:30 -0400, Michael A. Terrell wrote:
terryc wrote:
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 23:55:15 -0400, Michael A. Terrell wrote:
Tell me, Phil. How may missions did you fly for the Russians
in
WW-II? If zero, you have no clue as to what the pilots thought of
the planes they flew.
Wow, you claim to have talked to old Russian pilots now.
Where did I say that? Are you on the same drugs as Phil?
Well, it seems you are. You asked Phil if he'd ever flown for the
Russians in WWII. Was that an admission that you are talking out your
arse?
That's your specialty, like all low grade trolls.
I take it that is an admission that I am correct on this point.
No, but you'll claim it anyway. Your ignorance and arrogance won't
let you do anything else.
Having the combination of ignorance and arrogance is what sets
Americans apart from the rest of the world.
naah, admit it. the copmpanies could get more for it by selling it to theOther than it was availible, already refined and delivered to our
allies. We wouldn't have taken it from our civilians and given it to
other countries if they could have supplied enough for themselves.
Nope. Just wondering how "U" is included in "We".No more than we can do about the clueless trolls on any newsgroup.
"We"?
Is a two letter word too complex for you?
You are letting your imagination run away with you.Bill Slomanwrote:
On Oct 16, 10:50 pm, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...@earthlink.net
wrote:
Bill Slomanwrote:
On Oct 13, 4:04 am, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...@earthlink.net
wrote:
Bill Slomanwrote:
Terrell is a right-wing brown-nose on sci.electronics.design. The
people whom he brown-noses don't like factual corrections either, so
they aren't fond of me, and Mike parrots some of their sillier claims.
Bill posts common knowledge, while pretending that its a closely held
state secret.
Common knowledge that you don't appear to have been able to access.
I stated that it came from a US refinery. What other process is
used?
Other countries have - and had - refineries. You get a better yield of
high octane gasolene from light crude than you do from heavy crude,
but there was nothing magical about US oil.
Other than it was availible, already refined and delivered to our
allies. We wouldn't have taken it from our civilians and given it to
other countries if they could have supplied enough for themselves. We
did supply the high quality fuel needed for those engines, even if you
won't admit it. Local crude supplies were cracked for other uses.
He is an unemployable old loser with a huge chip on his shoulder.
Mike is - of course - unemployed for health reasons. His winsome
personality doesn't come into it. I'm 66 which means that I'm retired,
rather than unemployed. You were unemployed for years, before you 'retired'.
Yawn. The VA has stated that I CAN NEVER WORK AGAIN.
Which must be a relief to your former co-workers.
No, they liked to try to stump me with technical problems, but they
never could. I'm sure they partied for weeks every time you were fired,
though.
Sure, we understand.They haven't stopped me from doing volunteer work on the days I'm able to
leave MY house.
And we can understand why you can't find anybody to share it.
I'm not looking to share it. I don't ned to take in boarders to make
ends meet. I sleep odd hours due to my failing health, and don't want
people bugging me when I'm ill.
On Sat, 17 Oct 2009 04:24:13 -0400, Michael A. Terrell wrote:
Other than it was availible, already refined and delivered to our
allies. We wouldn't have taken it from our civilians and given it to
other countries if they could have supplied enough for themselves.
naah, admit it. the copmpanies could get more for it by selling it to the
allies and compared to selling it to the locals.