Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Damian <damian_andrews75@yahoo.com.au> wrote
It'a 14 year old digital camera,
Its a dinosaur.
that still works like a charm with AA bats.
You get a lot better result with a decent modern
camera that has an internal lithium ion battery.
Even a 14 year old DSLR will easily outperform a fixed lens
smartphone.
That was talking about a decent modern
DSLR, not a fixed lens smartphone.
Try doing macro close-up work with a smartphone!
Having fun thrashing that straw man ?
It's true - smartphones are crap at macro photography.
Pity smartphones don't even appear at all in what you quoted.
Cheap modern digital cameras are also MUCH better than most
smartphone cameras.
Having fun thrashing that straw man ?
You said smartphones are better - they are NOT!
Smartphones don't even appear at all in what you quoted.
For $50 you can buy a 14 or better Megapixel camera with x8 or
better OPTICAL zoom.
Having fun thrashing that straw man ?
What part of "For $50 you can buy a 14 or better Megapixel camera
with x8 or better OPTICAL zoom" do I need to explain to you?
Having fun thrashing that straw man ?
You are avoiding the point
There was never any point, just you thrashing some straw man.
Cut the crap.
No need to tell yourself that publicly, just do it.
The only crap here is you changing your story.
You were putting shit on old DSLR's,
And was clearly saying that a decent modern DSLR
with a built in lithium ion battery leaves it for dead.
No, you actually claimed smartphones are better than Damian's SLR:
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Damian <damian_andrews75@yahoo.com.au> wrote
It'a 14 year old digital camera,
Its a dinosaur.
that still works like a charm with AA bats.
You get a lot better result with a decent modern
camera that has an internal lithium ion battery.
Even a 14 year old DSLR will easily outperform a fixed lens smartphone.
That was talking about a decent modern
DSLR, not a fixed lens smartphone.
Try doing macro close-up work with a smartphone!
Having fun thrashing that straw man ?
It's true - smartphones are crap at macro photography.
Pity smartphones don't even appear at all in what you quoted.
Cheap modern digital cameras are also MUCH better than most smartphone cameras.
Having fun thrashing that straw man ?
You said smartphones are better - they are NOT!
Smartphones don't even appear at all in what you quoted.
For $50 you can buy a 14 or better Megapixel camera with x8 or better OPTICAL zoom.
Having fun thrashing that straw man ?
What part of "For $50 you can buy a 14 or better Megapixel camera
with x8 or better OPTICAL zoom" do I need to explain to you?
Having fun thrashing that straw man ?
You are avoiding the point
There was never any point, just you thrashing some straw man.
Cut the crap.
No need to tell yourself that publicly, just do it.
The only crap here is you changing your story.
Everyone can see for themselves that I
have not changed any story in the above.
You were putting shit on old DSLR's,
And was clearly saying that a decent modern DSLR
with a built in lithium ion battery leaves it for dead.
No, you actually claimed smartphones are better than Damian's SLR:
Everyone can see for themselves that I never did in what you quoted.
On 11/03/2014 8:37 AM, Rod Speed wrote:
You never could bullshit your way out of a wet paper bag.
Poor old roddles, doesn't have an answer, but he just can't give up.
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Damian <damian_andrews75@yahoo.com.au> wrote
It'a 14 year old digital camera,
Its a dinosaur.
that still works like a charm with AA bats.
You get a lot better result with a decent modern
camera that has an internal lithium ion battery.
Even a 14 year old DSLR will easily outperform a fixed lens smartphone.
That was talking about a decent modern
DSLR, not a fixed lens smartphone.
Try doing macro close-up work with a smartphone!
Having fun thrashing that straw man ?
It's true - smartphones are crap at macro photography.
Pity smartphones don't even appear at all in what you quoted.
Cheap modern digital cameras are also MUCH better than most smartphone cameras.
Having fun thrashing that straw man ?
You said smartphones are better - they are NOT!
Smartphones don't even appear at all in what you quoted.
For $50 you can buy a 14 or better Megapixel camera with x8 or better OPTICAL zoom.
Having fun thrashing that straw man ?
What part of "For $50 you can buy a 14 or better Megapixel camera
with x8 or better OPTICAL zoom" do I need to explain to you?
Having fun thrashing that straw man ?
You are avoiding the point
There was never any point, just you thrashing some straw man.
Cut the crap.
No need to tell yourself that publicly, just do it.
The only crap here is you changing your story.
Everyone can see for themselves that I
have not changed any story in the above.
You were putting shit on old DSLR's,
And was clearly saying that a decent modern DSLR
with a built in lithium ion battery leaves it for dead.
No, you actually claimed smartphones are better than Damian's SLR:
Everyone can see for themselves that I never did in what you quoted.
Yeah?
Yep.
You sure chose some misleading words, then.
Everyone can see for themselves that I never did in what you quoted.
On 10/03/2014 11:35 PM, Rod Speed wrote:
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Damian <damian_andrews75@yahoo.com.au> wrote
It'a 14 year old digital camera,
Its a dinosaur.
that still works like a charm with AA bats.
You get a lot better result with a decent modern
camera that has an internal lithium ion battery.
Even a 14 year old DSLR will easily outperform a fixed lens
smartphone.
That was talking about a decent modern
DSLR, not a fixed lens smartphone.
Try doing macro close-up work with a smartphone!
Having fun thrashing that straw man ?
It's true - smartphones are crap at macro photography.
Pity smartphones don't even appear at all in what you quoted.
Cheap modern digital cameras are also MUCH better than most
smartphone cameras.
Having fun thrashing that straw man ?
You said smartphones are better - they are NOT!
Smartphones don't even appear at all in what you quoted.
For $50 you can buy a 14 or better Megapixel camera with x8 or
better OPTICAL zoom.
Having fun thrashing that straw man ?
What part of "For $50 you can buy a 14 or better Megapixel
camera
with x8 or better OPTICAL zoom" do I need to explain to you?
Having fun thrashing that straw man ?
You are avoiding the point
There was never any point, just you thrashing some straw man.
Cut the crap.
No need to tell yourself that publicly, just do it.
The only crap here is you changing your story.
Everyone can see for themselves that I
have not changed any story in the above.
You were putting shit on old DSLR's,
And was clearly saying that a decent modern DSLR
with a built in lithium ion battery leaves it for dead.
No, you actually claimed smartphones are better than Damian's SLR:
Everyone can see for themselves that I never did in what you quoted.
Yeah?
Yep.
You sure chose some misleading words, then.
Everyone can see for themselves that I never did in what you quoted.
"yaputya" <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote in message news:bo8innF460mU1@mid.individual.net...
On 10/03/2014 11:35 PM, Rod Speed wrote:
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Damian <damian_andrews75@yahoo.com.au> wrote
It'a 14 year old digital camera,
Its a dinosaur.
that still works like a charm with AA bats.
You get a lot better result with a decent modern
camera that has an internal lithium ion battery.
Even a 14 year old DSLR will easily outperform a fixed lens smartphone.
That was talking about a decent modern
DSLR, not a fixed lens smartphone.
Try doing macro close-up work with a smartphone!
Having fun thrashing that straw man ?
It's true - smartphones are crap at macro photography.
Pity smartphones don't even appear at all in what you quoted.
Cheap modern digital cameras are also MUCH better than most smartphone cameras.
Having fun thrashing that straw man ?
You said smartphones are better - they are NOT!
Smartphones don't even appear at all in what you quoted.
For $50 you can buy a 14 or better Megapixel camera with x8 or better OPTICAL zoom.
Having fun thrashing that straw man ?
What part of "For $50 you can buy a 14 or better Megapixel camera
with x8 or better OPTICAL zoom" do I need to explain to you?
Having fun thrashing that straw man ?
You are avoiding the point
There was never any point, just you thrashing some straw man.
Cut the crap.
No need to tell yourself that publicly, just do it.
The only crap here is you changing your story.
Everyone can see for themselves that I
have not changed any story in the above.
You were putting shit on old DSLR's,
And was clearly saying that a decent modern DSLR
with a built in lithium ion battery leaves it for dead.
No, you actually claimed smartphones are better than Damian's SLR:
Everyone can see for themselves that I never did in what you quoted.
Yeah?
Yep.
You sure chose some misleading words, then.
Everyone can see for themselves that I never did in what you quoted.
None of what you added was ever part of what you have above, child.
On 11/03/2014 7:17 PM, Rod Speed wrote:
"yaputya" <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote in message
news:bo8innF460mU1@mid.individual.net...
On 10/03/2014 11:35 PM, Rod Speed wrote:
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Damian <damian_andrews75@yahoo.com.au> wrote
It'a 14 year old digital camera,
Its a dinosaur.
that still works like a charm with AA bats.
You get a lot better result with a decent modern
camera that has an internal lithium ion battery.
Even a 14 year old DSLR will easily outperform a fixed lens
smartphone.
That was talking about a decent modern
DSLR, not a fixed lens smartphone.
Try doing macro close-up work with a smartphone!
Having fun thrashing that straw man ?
It's true - smartphones are crap at macro photography.
Pity smartphones don't even appear at all in what you quoted.
Cheap modern digital cameras are also MUCH better than most
smartphone cameras.
Having fun thrashing that straw man ?
You said smartphones are better - they are NOT!
Smartphones don't even appear at all in what you quoted.
For $50 you can buy a 14 or better Megapixel camera with x8
or better OPTICAL zoom.
Having fun thrashing that straw man ?
What part of "For $50 you can buy a 14 or better Megapixel
camera
with x8 or better OPTICAL zoom" do I need to explain to you?
Having fun thrashing that straw man ?
You are avoiding the point
There was never any point, just you thrashing some straw man.
Cut the crap.
No need to tell yourself that publicly, just do it.
The only crap here is you changing your story.
Everyone can see for themselves that I
have not changed any story in the above.
You were putting shit on old DSLR's,
And was clearly saying that a decent modern DSLR
with a built in lithium ion battery leaves it for dead.
No, you actually claimed smartphones are better than Damian's SLR:
Everyone can see for themselves that I never did in what you quoted.
Yeah?
Yep.
You sure chose some misleading words, then.
Everyone can see for themselves that I never did in what you quoted.
None of what you added was ever part of what you have above, child.
Grow up yourself.
"yaputya" <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote in message news:boaq4pFimjpU1@mid.individual.net...
On 11/03/2014 7:17 PM, Rod Speed wrote:
"yaputya" <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote in message news:bo8innF460mU1@mid.individual.net...
On 10/03/2014 11:35 PM, Rod Speed wrote:
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Damian <damian_andrews75@yahoo.com.au> wrote
It'a 14 year old digital camera,
Its a dinosaur.
that still works like a charm with AA bats.
You get a lot better result with a decent modern
camera that has an internal lithium ion battery.
Even a 14 year old DSLR will easily outperform a fixed lens smartphone.
That was talking about a decent modern
DSLR, not a fixed lens smartphone.
Try doing macro close-up work with a smartphone!
Having fun thrashing that straw man ?
It's true - smartphones are crap at macro photography.
Pity smartphones don't even appear at all in what you quoted.
Cheap modern digital cameras are also MUCH better than most smartphone cameras.
Having fun thrashing that straw man ?
You said smartphones are better - they are NOT!
Smartphones don't even appear at all in what you quoted.
For $50 you can buy a 14 or better Megapixel camera with x8 or better OPTICAL zoom.
Having fun thrashing that straw man ?
What part of "For $50 you can buy a 14 or better Megapixel camera
with x8 or better OPTICAL zoom" do I need to explain to you?
Having fun thrashing that straw man ?
You are avoiding the point
There was never any point, just you thrashing some straw man.
Cut the crap.
No need to tell yourself that publicly, just do it.
The only crap here is you changing your story.
Everyone can see for themselves that I
have not changed any story in the above.
You were putting shit on old DSLR's,
And was clearly saying that a decent modern DSLR
with a built in lithium ion battery leaves it for dead.
No, you actually claimed smartphones are better than Damian's SLR:
Everyone can see for themselves that I never did in what you quoted.
Yeah?
Yep.
You sure chose some misleading words, then.
Everyone can see for themselves that I never did in what you quoted.
None of what you added was ever part of what you have above, child.
Grow up yourself.
This where I am sposed to curl up and die is it child ?
On 12/03/2014 4:36 PM, Rod Speed wrote:
"yaputya" <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote in message
news:boaq4pFimjpU1@mid.individual.net...
On 11/03/2014 7:17 PM, Rod Speed wrote:
"yaputya" <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote in message
news:bo8innF460mU1@mid.individual.net...
On 10/03/2014 11:35 PM, Rod Speed wrote:
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Damian <damian_andrews75@yahoo.com.au> wrote
It'a 14 year old digital camera,
Its a dinosaur.
that still works like a charm with AA bats.
You get a lot better result with a decent modern
camera that has an internal lithium ion battery.
Even a 14 year old DSLR will easily outperform a fixed
lens smartphone.
That was talking about a decent modern
DSLR, not a fixed lens smartphone.
Try doing macro close-up work with a smartphone!
Having fun thrashing that straw man ?
It's true - smartphones are crap at macro photography.
Pity smartphones don't even appear at all in what you quoted.
Cheap modern digital cameras are also MUCH better than
most smartphone cameras.
Having fun thrashing that straw man ?
You said smartphones are better - they are NOT!
Smartphones don't even appear at all in what you quoted.
For $50 you can buy a 14 or better Megapixel camera with
x8 or better OPTICAL zoom.
Having fun thrashing that straw man ?
What part of "For $50 you can buy a 14 or better Megapixel
camera
with x8 or better OPTICAL zoom" do I need to explain to
you?
Having fun thrashing that straw man ?
You are avoiding the point
There was never any point, just you thrashing some straw man.
Cut the crap.
No need to tell yourself that publicly, just do it.
The only crap here is you changing your story.
Everyone can see for themselves that I
have not changed any story in the above.
You were putting shit on old DSLR's,
And was clearly saying that a decent modern DSLR
with a built in lithium ion battery leaves it for dead.
No, you actually claimed smartphones are better than Damian's SLR:
Everyone can see for themselves that I never did in what you
quoted.
Yeah?
Yep.
You sure chose some misleading words, then.
Everyone can see for themselves that I never did in what you quoted.
None of what you added was ever part of what you have above, child.
Grow up yourself.
This where I am sposed to curl up and die is it child ?
You are pathetic.
"yaputya" <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote in message news:bobnouFp1irU1@mid.individual.net...
On 12/03/2014 4:36 PM, Rod Speed wrote:
"yaputya" <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote in message news:boaq4pFimjpU1@mid.individual.net...
On 11/03/2014 7:17 PM, Rod Speed wrote:
"yaputya" <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote in message news:bo8innF460mU1@mid.individual.net...
On 10/03/2014 11:35 PM, Rod Speed wrote:
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Damian <damian_andrews75@yahoo.com.au> wrote
It'a 14 year old digital camera,
Its a dinosaur.
that still works like a charm with AA bats.
You get a lot better result with a decent modern
camera that has an internal lithium ion battery.
Even a 14 year old DSLR will easily outperform a fixed lens smartphone.
That was talking about a decent modern
DSLR, not a fixed lens smartphone.
Try doing macro close-up work with a smartphone!
Having fun thrashing that straw man ?
It's true - smartphones are crap at macro photography.
Pity smartphones don't even appear at all in what you quoted.
Cheap modern digital cameras are also MUCH better than most smartphone cameras.
Having fun thrashing that straw man ?
You said smartphones are better - they are NOT!
Smartphones don't even appear at all in what you quoted.
For $50 you can buy a 14 or better Megapixel camera with x8 or better OPTICAL zoom.
Having fun thrashing that straw man ?
What part of "For $50 you can buy a 14 or better Megapixel camera
with x8 or better OPTICAL zoom" do I need to explain to you?
Having fun thrashing that straw man ?
You are avoiding the point
There was never any point, just you thrashing some straw man.
Cut the crap.
No need to tell yourself that publicly, just do it.
The only crap here is you changing your story.
Everyone can see for themselves that I
have not changed any story in the above.
You were putting shit on old DSLR's,
And was clearly saying that a decent modern DSLR
with a built in lithium ion battery leaves it for dead.
No, you actually claimed smartphones are better than Damian's SLR:
Everyone can see for themselves that I never did in what you quoted.
Yeah?
Yep.
You sure chose some misleading words, then.
Everyone can see for themselves that I never did in what you quoted.
None of what you added was ever part of what you have above, child.
Grow up yourself.
This where I am sposed to curl up and die is it child ?
You are pathetic.
This where I am sposed to curl up and die is it child ?
On 12/03/2014 9:58 PM, Rod Speed wrote:
"yaputya" <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote in message
news:bobnouFp1irU1@mid.individual.net...
On 12/03/2014 4:36 PM, Rod Speed wrote:
"yaputya" <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote in message
news:boaq4pFimjpU1@mid.individual.net...
On 11/03/2014 7:17 PM, Rod Speed wrote:
"yaputya" <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote in message
news:bo8innF460mU1@mid.individual.net...
On 10/03/2014 11:35 PM, Rod Speed wrote:
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Damian <damian_andrews75@yahoo.com.au> wrote
It'a 14 year old digital camera,
Its a dinosaur.
that still works like a charm with AA bats.
You get a lot better result with a decent modern
camera that has an internal lithium ion battery.
Even a 14 year old DSLR will easily outperform a fixed
lens smartphone.
That was talking about a decent modern
DSLR, not a fixed lens smartphone.
Try doing macro close-up work with a smartphone!
Having fun thrashing that straw man ?
It's true - smartphones are crap at macro photography.
Pity smartphones don't even appear at all in what you
quoted.
Cheap modern digital cameras are also MUCH better than
most smartphone cameras.
Having fun thrashing that straw man ?
You said smartphones are better - they are NOT!
Smartphones don't even appear at all in what you quoted.
For $50 you can buy a 14 or better Megapixel camera with
x8 or better OPTICAL zoom.
Having fun thrashing that straw man ?
What part of "For $50 you can buy a 14 or better Megapixel
camera
with x8 or better OPTICAL zoom" do I need to explain to
you?
Having fun thrashing that straw man ?
You are avoiding the point
There was never any point, just you thrashing some straw man.
Cut the crap.
No need to tell yourself that publicly, just do it.
The only crap here is you changing your story.
Everyone can see for themselves that I
have not changed any story in the above.
You were putting shit on old DSLR's,
And was clearly saying that a decent modern DSLR
with a built in lithium ion battery leaves it for dead.
No, you actually claimed smartphones are better than Damian's
SLR:
Everyone can see for themselves that I never did in what you
quoted.
Yeah?
Yep.
You sure chose some misleading words, then.
Everyone can see for themselves that I never did in what you
quoted.
None of what you added was ever part of what you have above, child.
Grow up yourself.
This where I am sposed to curl up and die is it child ?
You are pathetic.
This where I am sposed to curl up and die is it child ?
Whatever. Your childish broken-record insults only reflect on your own
maturity.
This where I am sposed to curl up and die is it child ?
You are pathetic.
This where I am sposed to curl up and die is it child ?
Whatever. Your childish broken-record insults only reflect on your own maturity.
This where I am sposed to curl up and die is it child ?
On 13/03/2014 12:59 AM, Rod Speed wrote:
This where I am sposed to curl up and die is it child ?
You are pathetic.
This where I am sposed to curl up and die is it child ?
Whatever. Your childish broken-record insults only reflect on your own
maturity.
This where I am sposed to curl up and die is it child ?
Is it just a broken-record or is he just brain-dead?
"yaputya" <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote in message news:bocc6vFtdn1U1@mid.individual.net...
On 13/03/2014 12:59 AM, Rod Speed wrote:
This where I am sposed to curl up and die is it child ?
You are pathetic.
This where I am sposed to curl up and die is it child ?
Whatever. Your childish broken-record insults only reflect on your own maturity.
This where I am sposed to curl up and die is it child ?
Is it just a broken-record or is he just brain-dead?
This where I am sposed to curl up and die is it child ?
OMG, the rodbot has gone into an oozlum loop. Thats the end of the"yaputya" <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote in message
news:bocc6vFtdn1U1@mid.individual.net...
On 13/03/2014 12:59 AM, Rod Speed wrote:
This where I am sposed to curl up and die is it child ?
You are pathetic.
This where I am sposed to curl up and die is it child ?
Whatever. Your childish broken-record insults only reflect on your
own maturity.
This where I am sposed to curl up and die is it child ?
Is it just a broken-record or is he just brain-dead?
This where I am sposed to curl up and die is it child ?
On 13/03/2014 4:27 AM, Rod Speed wrote:
"yaputya" <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote in message
news:bocc6vFtdn1U1@mid.individual.net...
On 13/03/2014 12:59 AM, Rod Speed wrote:
This where I am sposed to curl up and die is it child ?
You are pathetic.
This where I am sposed to curl up and die is it child ?
Whatever. Your childish broken-record insults only reflect on your own
maturity.
This where I am sposed to curl up and die is it child ?
Is it just a broken-record or is he just brain-dead?
This where I am sposed to curl up and die is it child ?
He IS just brain-dead.
"yaputya" <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote in message news:bodn17F77d6U1@mid.individual.net...
On 13/03/2014 4:27 AM, Rod Speed wrote:
"yaputya" <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote in message news:bocc6vFtdn1U1@mid.individual.net...
On 13/03/2014 12:59 AM, Rod Speed wrote:
This where I am sposed to curl up and die is it child ?
You are pathetic.
This where I am sposed to curl up and die is it child ?
Whatever. Your childish broken-record insults only reflect on your own maturity.
This where I am sposed to curl up and die is it child ?
Is it just a broken-record or is he just brain-dead?
This where I am sposed to curl up and die is it child ?
He IS just brain-dead.
This where I am sposed to curl up and die is it child ?
He IS just brain-dead.
On 13/03/2014 7:01 PM, Rod Speed wrote:
"yaputya" <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote in message
news:bodn17F77d6U1@mid.individual.net...
On 13/03/2014 4:27 AM, Rod Speed wrote:
"yaputya" <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote in message
news:bocc6vFtdn1U1@mid.individual.net...
On 13/03/2014 12:59 AM, Rod Speed wrote:
This where I am sposed to curl up and die is it child ?
You are pathetic.
This where I am sposed to curl up and die is it child ?
Whatever. Your childish broken-record insults only reflect on your
own maturity.
This where I am sposed to curl up and die is it child ?
Is it just a broken-record or is he just brain-dead?
This where I am sposed to curl up and die is it child ?
He IS just brain-dead.
This where I am sposed to curl up and die is it child ?
He IS just brain-dead.