Lithium Ion standard batteries

[SG1]

"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:boendmFe9i6U1@mid.individual.net...

This where I am sposed to curl up and die is it child ?

Roddles they may say YES

 

[Rod Speed]

SG1 <Lost@theraces.com> wrote

Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote

This where I am sposed to curl up and die is it child ?

Roddles they may say YES

Doesn’t matter a damned thing what they say,
it’s as relevant as what the average 2 year old says.

 

[yaputya]

On 14/03/2014 12:28 AM, Rod Speed wrote:

SG1 <Lost@theraces.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote

This where I am sposed to curl up and die is it child ?

Roddles they may say YES

Doesn’t matter a damned thing what they say,
it’s as relevant as what the average 2 year old says.

An absolutely pathetic response, the ROD fool doesn't want to
address what HE wrote.....HEY-wake up - YOU wrote this.....

Here is what I quoted:
Damian>> My 14 year old digital camera still fits inside my side pocket.
Rod Speed>Most of us just use our much better phone cameras instead.
.............
Damian>> Dunno. The canon digital camera still produces higher enough mega pixels.
Damian>> And the SD cards are still available for more memory.
Damian>> Doesn't make sense throwing away something that's so flexible
Damian>> and still get the job done.
Rod Speed >Even the iphone 5S leaves it for dead.

No response, as you would expect from the brain-dead.

 

[yaputya]

On 13/03/2014 10:48 PM, Rod Speed wrote:

"yaputya" <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote in message news:boej31Fdbf1U1@mid.individual.net...
On 13/03/2014 7:01 PM, Rod Speed wrote:


"yaputya" <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote in message news:bodn17F77d6U1@mid.individual.net...
On 13/03/2014 4:27 AM, Rod Speed wrote:


"yaputya" <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote in message news:bocc6vFtdn1U1@mid.individual.net...
On 13/03/2014 12:59 AM, Rod Speed wrote:


This where I am sposed to curl up and die is it child ?

You are pathetic.

This where I am sposed to curl up and die is it child ?

Whatever. Your childish broken-record insults only reflect on your own maturity.

This where I am sposed to curl up and die is it child ?


Is it just a broken-record or is he just brain-dead?

This where I am sposed to curl up and die is it child ?



He IS just brain-dead.

This where I am sposed to curl up and die is it child ?

He IS just brain-dead.

This where I am sposed to curl up and die is it child ?

You have run out of intelligent responses......
A long time ago......

 

[yaputya]

On 13/03/2014 7:02 PM, Rod Speed wrote:

Some gutless fuckwit pom desperately cowering behind
keithr <user@domain.invalid> wrote just the puerile shit
any 2 year old could leave for dead, as always.

Why a POM?

 

[Rod Speed]

"yaputya" <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote in message
news:bog44gFmpe8U2@mid.individual.net...

On 13/03/2014 10:48 PM, Rod Speed wrote:


"yaputya" <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote in message
news:boej31Fdbf1U1@mid.individual.net...
On 13/03/2014 7:01 PM, Rod Speed wrote:


"yaputya" <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote in message
news:bodn17F77d6U1@mid.individual.net...
On 13/03/2014 4:27 AM, Rod Speed wrote:


"yaputya" <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote in message
news:bocc6vFtdn1U1@mid.individual.net...
On 13/03/2014 12:59 AM, Rod Speed wrote:


This where I am sposed to curl up and die is it child ?

You are pathetic.

This where I am sposed to curl up and die is it child ?

Whatever. Your childish broken-record insults only reflect on your
own maturity.

This where I am sposed to curl up and die is it child ?


Is it just a broken-record or is he just brain-dead?

This where I am sposed to curl up and die is it child ?



He IS just brain-dead.

This where I am sposed to curl up and die is it child ?

He IS just brain-dead.

This where I am sposed to curl up and die is it child ?


You have run out of intelligent responses......
A long time ago......

You never had one, child.

 

[Rod Speed]

"yaputya" <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote in message
news:bog3vbFmpe8U1@mid.individual.net...

On 14/03/2014 12:28 AM, Rod Speed wrote:
SG1 <Lost@theraces.com> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote

This where I am sposed to curl up and die is it child ?

Roddles they may say YES

Doesn’t matter a damned thing what they say,
it’s as relevant as what the average 2 year old says.

An absolutely pathetic response,

This where I am sposed to curl up and die is it child ?

 

[Rod Speed]

yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote

Rod Speed wrote

Some gutless fuckwit pom desperately cowering behind
keithr <user@domain.invalid> wrote just the puerile shit
any 2 year old could leave for dead, as always.

Why a POM?

Because he was born there to pom parents, stupid.

 

[keithr]

On 17/03/2014 2:23 PM, Rod Speed wrote:

"keithr" <user@domain.invalid> wrote in message
news:bomtjrF5puoU1@mid.individual.net...
On 17/03/2014 4:46 AM, Rod Speed wrote:
keithr <user@domain.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote

Some gutless fuckwit pom desperately cowering behind
keithr <user@domain.invalid> wrote just the puerile shit
any 2 year old could leave for dead, as always.

Why a POM?

Because he was born there to pom parents, stupid.

Just like Abbott.

He didn’t have pom parents, fuckwit.

He has a pommy father,

Not when he was born he didn’t.

Unless he officially renounced his British citizenship, he was still a
British citizen.

https://www.gov.uk/renounce-british-nationality/apply

Bet he didn't.

he was born in the UK.

To Australian parents.

Makes no difference.

That makes him a British citizen

Wrong, as always.

ROFL Always in such a hurry to be shown as a know-nothing

Lets see what the British government has to say about it

https://www.gov.uk/check-british-citizen

Check if you're a British citizen

1 When were you born?

Before 1 January 1983

2 Were you born in the UK or a qualifying territory?

Yes

In most cases you’re a British citizen

There are only 2 cases when you won’t be a British citizen:

your father was a diplomat working for a non-UK country

your father was ‘an enemy alien in occupation’ - this only
applies to people born in the Channel Islands during World War 2

IE he was born a British citizen no matter whether his parents were
Australian or not.

Suck that up spoodle.

 

[Rod Speed]

keithr <user@domain.invalid> wrote

Rod Speed wrote
keithr <user@domain.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
keithr <user@domain.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote

Some gutless fuckwit pom desperately cowering behind
keithr <user@domain.invalid> wrote just the puerile shit
any 2 year old could leave for dead, as always.

Why a POM?

Because he was born there to pom parents, stupid.

Just like Abbott.

He didn’t have pom parents, fuckwit.

He has a pommy father,

Not when he was born he didn’t.

Unless he officially renounced his British citizenship, he was still a
British citizen.

Irrelevant to whether he was an Australian at the time
Abbott was born.

> https://www.gov.uk/renounce-british-nationality/apply

Irrelevant to whether he was an Australian at the time
Abbott was born.

> Bet he didn't.

Irrelevant to whether he was an Australian at the time
Abbott was born.

he was born in the UK.

To Australian parents.

Makes no difference.

Wrong, as always.

That makes him a British citizen

Wrong, as always.

ROFL Always in such a hurry to be shown as a know-nothing

We'll see...

> Lets see what the British government has to say about it

Irrelevant to whether he was an Australian at the time
Abbott was born.

> https://www.gov.uk/check-british-citizen

Irrelevant to whether he was an Australian at the time
Abbott was born.

> Check if you're a British citizen

Irrelevant to whether he was an Australian at the time
Abbott was born.

1 When were you born?

Before 1 January 1983

2 Were you born in the UK or a qualifying territory?

Yes

In most cases you’re a British citizen

Irrelevant to whether he was an Australian at the time
Abbott was born.

> There are only 2 cases when you won’t be a British citizen:

Irrelevant to whether he was an Australian at the time
Abbott was born.

your father was a diplomat working for a non-UK country

your father was ‘an enemy alien in occupation’ - this only applies to
people born in the Channel Islands during World War 2

IE he was born a British citizen no matter whether his parents were
Australian or not.

Irrelevant to whether he was an Australian at the time
Abbott was born.

 

[SG1]

"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:boorqiFicueU1@mid.individual.net...

keithr <user@domain.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
keithr <user@domain.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
keithr <user@domain.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote

Some gutless fuckwit pom desperately cowering behind
keithr <user@domain.invalid> wrote just the puerile shit
any 2 year old could leave for dead, as always.

Why a POM?

Because he was born there to pom parents, stupid.

Just like Abbott.

He didn’t have pom parents, fuckwit.

He has a pommy father,

Not when he was born he didn’t.

Unless he officially renounced his British citizenship, he was still a
British citizen.

Irrelevant to whether he was an Australian at the time
Abbott was born.

https://www.gov.uk/renounce-british-nationality/apply

Irrelevant to whether he was an Australian at the time
Abbott was born.

Bet he didn't.

Irrelevant to whether he was an Australian at the time
Abbott was born.

he was born in the UK.

To Australian parents.

Makes no difference.

Wrong, as always.

That makes him a British citizen

Wrong, as always.

ROFL Always in such a hurry to be shown as a know-nothing

We'll see...

Lets see what the British government has to say about it

Irrelevant to whether he was an Australian at the time
Abbott was born.

https://www.gov.uk/check-british-citizen

Irrelevant to whether he was an Australian at the time
Abbott was born.

Check if you're a British citizen

Irrelevant to whether he was an Australian at the time
Abbott was born.

1 When were you born?

Before 1 January 1983

2 Were you born in the UK or a qualifying territory?

Yes

In most cases you’re a British citizen

Irrelevant to whether he was an Australian at the time
Abbott was born.

There are only 2 cases when you won’t be a British citizen:

Irrelevant to whether he was an Australian at the time
Abbott was born.

your father was a diplomat working for a non-UK country

your father was ‘an enemy alien in occupation’ - this only applies to
people born in the Channel Islands during World War 2

IE he was born a British citizen no matter whether his parents were
Australian or not.

Irrelevant to whether he was an Australian at the time
Abbott was born.

Yes Roddles irrelevant as he was born a POM. You have lost this weeks ago.
Now go and curl up and suck that thumb as the dummy has been spat a long
time ago.

 

[Rod Speed]

"SG1" <Lost@theraces.com> wrote in message
news:53276d50$0$17046$c3e8da3$dd9697d2@news.astraweb.com...

"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:boorqiFicueU1@mid.individual.net...
keithr <user@domain.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
keithr <user@domain.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
keithr <user@domain.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote

Some gutless fuckwit pom desperately cowering behind
keithr <user@domain.invalid> wrote just the puerile shit
any 2 year old could leave for dead, as always.

Why a POM?

Because he was born there to pom parents, stupid.

Just like Abbott.

He didn’t have pom parents, fuckwit.

He has a pommy father,

Not when he was born he didn’t.

Unless he officially renounced his British citizenship, he was still a
British citizen.

Irrelevant to whether he was an Australian at the time
Abbott was born.

https://www.gov.uk/renounce-british-nationality/apply

Irrelevant to whether he was an Australian at the time
Abbott was born.

Bet he didn't.

Irrelevant to whether he was an Australian at the time
Abbott was born.

he was born in the UK.

To Australian parents.

Makes no difference.

Wrong, as always.

That makes him a British citizen

Wrong, as always.

ROFL Always in such a hurry to be shown as a know-nothing

We'll see...

Lets see what the British government has to say about it

Irrelevant to whether he was an Australian at the time
Abbott was born.

https://www.gov.uk/check-british-citizen

Irrelevant to whether he was an Australian at the time
Abbott was born.

Check if you're a British citizen

Irrelevant to whether he was an Australian at the time
Abbott was born.

1 When were you born?

Before 1 January 1983

2 Were you born in the UK or a qualifying territory?

Yes

In most cases you’re a British citizen

Irrelevant to whether he was an Australian at the time
Abbott was born.

There are only 2 cases when you won’t be a British citizen:

Irrelevant to whether he was an Australian at the time
Abbott was born.

your father was a diplomat working for a non-UK country

your father was ‘an enemy alien in occupation’ - this only applies
to people born in the Channel Islands during World War 2

IE he was born a British citizen no matter whether his parents were
Australian or not.

Irrelevant to whether he was an Australian at the time
Abbott was born.

Yes Roddles irrelevant as he was born a POM.

Easy to claim.

> You have lost this weeks ago.

Wrong, as always.

 

[keithr]

On 18/03/2014 4:04 AM, Rod Speed wrote:

keithr <user@domain.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
keithr <user@domain.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
keithr <user@domain.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote

Some gutless fuckwit pom desperately cowering behind
keithr <user@domain.invalid> wrote just the puerile shit
any 2 year old could leave for dead, as always.

Why a POM?

Because he was born there to pom parents, stupid.

Just like Abbott.

He didn’t have pom parents, fuckwit.

He has a pommy father,

Not when he was born he didn’t.

Unless he officially renounced his British citizenship, he was still a
British citizen.

Irrelevant to whether he was an Australian at the time
Abbott was born.

https://www.gov.uk/renounce-british-nationality/apply

Irrelevant to whether he was an Australian at the time
Abbott was born.

Bet he didn't.

Irrelevant to whether he was an Australian at the time
Abbott was born.

he was born in the UK.

To Australian parents.

Makes no difference.

Wrong, as always.

That makes him a British citizen

Wrong, as always.

ROFL Always in such a hurry to be shown as a know-nothing

We'll see...

Lets see what the British government has to say about it

Irrelevant to whether he was an Australian at the time
Abbott was born.

https://www.gov.uk/check-british-citizen

Irrelevant to whether he was an Australian at the time
Abbott was born.

Check if you're a British citizen

Irrelevant to whether he was an Australian at the time
Abbott was born.

1 When were you born?

Before 1 January 1983

2 Were you born in the UK or a qualifying territory?

Yes

In most cases you’re a British citizen

Irrelevant to whether he was an Australian at the time
Abbott was born.

There are only 2 cases when you won’t be a British citizen:

Irrelevant to whether he was an Australian at the time
Abbott was born.

your father was a diplomat working for a non-UK country

your father was ‘an enemy alien in occupation’ - this only applies
to people born in the Channel Islands during World War 2

IE he was born a British citizen no matter whether his parents were
Australian or not.

Irrelevant to whether he was an Australian at the time
Abbott was born.

Abbott was born a pom proved beyond doubt, bluster all you like it don't
change anything.

Argument over. Bye bye.

 

[Rod Speed]

"keithr" <user@domain.invalid> wrote in message
news:boqka9Ftbu6U1@mid.individual.net...

On 18/03/2014 4:04 AM, Rod Speed wrote:
keithr <user@domain.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
keithr <user@domain.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
keithr <user@domain.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote

Some gutless fuckwit pom desperately cowering behind
keithr <user@domain.invalid> wrote just the puerile shit
any 2 year old could leave for dead, as always.

Why a POM?

Because he was born there to pom parents, stupid.

Just like Abbott.

He didn’t have pom parents, fuckwit.

He has a pommy father,

Not when he was born he didn’t.

Unless he officially renounced his British citizenship, he was still a
British citizen.

Irrelevant to whether he was an Australian at the time
Abbott was born.

https://www.gov.uk/renounce-british-nationality/apply

Irrelevant to whether he was an Australian at the time
Abbott was born.

Bet he didn't.

Irrelevant to whether he was an Australian at the time
Abbott was born.

he was born in the UK.

To Australian parents.

Makes no difference.

Wrong, as always.

That makes him a British citizen

Wrong, as always.

ROFL Always in such a hurry to be shown as a know-nothing

We'll see...

Lets see what the British government has to say about it

Irrelevant to whether he was an Australian at the time
Abbott was born.

https://www.gov.uk/check-british-citizen

Irrelevant to whether he was an Australian at the time
Abbott was born.

Check if you're a British citizen

Irrelevant to whether he was an Australian at the time
Abbott was born.

1 When were you born?

Before 1 January 1983

2 Were you born in the UK or a qualifying territory?

Yes

In most cases you’re a British citizen

Irrelevant to whether he was an Australian at the time
Abbott was born.

There are only 2 cases when you won’t be a British citizen:

Irrelevant to whether he was an Australian at the time
Abbott was born.

your father was a diplomat working for a non-UK country

your father was ‘an enemy alien in occupation’ - this only applies
to people born in the Channel Islands during World War 2

IE he was born a British citizen no matter whether his parents were
Australian or not.

Irrelevant to whether he was an Australian at the time
Abbott was born.

Abbott was born a pom proved beyond doubt,

Just another of your bare faced lies that you always end up with.

 

[news13]

On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 18:09:35 +1100, Damian wrote:

He's gota iphone. According to him, that replaces everything. It can
even cook a meal for you. ;-)

My landline does that; 1800-Rent-A-Chef!

 

[Damian]

"yaputya" <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote in message
news:bo1h8aFjikmU1@mid.individual.net...

On 8/03/2014 10:36 PM, Rod Speed wrote:
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Damian <damian_andrews75@yahoo.com.au> wrote

It'a 14 year old digital camera,

It’s a dinosaur.

that still works like a charm with AA bats.

You get a lot better result with a decent modern
camera that has an internal lithium ion battery.

Even a 14 year old DSLR will easily outperform a fixed lens
smartphone.

That was talking about a decent modern
DSLR, not a fixed lens smartphone.

Try doing macro close-up work with a smartphone!

Having fun thrashing that straw man ?

It's true - smartphones are crap at macro photography.

Pity smartphones don't even appear at all in what you quoted.

Cheap modern digital cameras are also MUCH better than most smartphone
cameras.

Having fun thrashing that straw man ?

You said smartphones are better - they are NOT!

Smartphones don't even appear at all in what you quoted.

For $50 you can buy a 14 or better Megapixel camera with x8 or better
OPTICAL zoom.

Having fun thrashing that straw man ?

What part of "For $50 you can buy a 14 or better Megapixel camera
with x8 or better OPTICAL zoom" do I need to explain to you?

Having fun thrashing that straw man ?

You are avoiding the point - understandable, because you are wrong.
Smartphones are clearly inferior to digital cameras.

He's gota iphone. According to him, that replaces everything. It can even
cook a meal for you. ;-)

 

[Damian]

"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:bo1rnmFllqdU1@mid.individual.net...

yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Damian <damian_andrews75@yahoo.com.au> wrote

It'a 14 year old digital camera,

It’s a dinosaur.

that still works like a charm with AA bats.

You get a lot better result with a decent modern
camera that has an internal lithium ion battery.

Even a 14 year old DSLR will easily outperform a fixed lens
smartphone.

That was talking about a decent modern
DSLR, not a fixed lens smartphone.

Try doing macro close-up work with a smartphone!

Having fun thrashing that straw man ?

It's true - smartphones are crap at macro photography.

Pity smartphones don't even appear at all in what you quoted.

Cheap modern digital cameras are also MUCH better than most
smartphone cameras.

Having fun thrashing that straw man ?

You said smartphones are better - they are NOT!

Smartphones don't even appear at all in what you quoted.

For $50 you can buy a 14 or better Megapixel camera with x8 or
better OPTICAL zoom.

Having fun thrashing that straw man ?

What part of "For $50 you can buy a 14 or better Megapixel camera
with x8 or better OPTICAL zoom" do I need to explain to you?

Having fun thrashing that straw man ?

You are avoiding the point

There was never any point, just you thrashing some straw man.

Cut the crap.

No need to tell yourself that publicly, just do it.

You were putting shit on old DSLR's,

And was clearly saying that a decent modern DSLR
with a built in lithium ion battery leaves it for dead.

No you wre 'clearly' saying your stupid shmart iwank phone can replace
digital cameras, DSLRs, etc, etc, and superior to all of them.
I have an iwank phone myself, it's a handy gadget, but nothing like a
replacement for everything as you claim it to be.

 

[Damian]

"yaputya" <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote in message
news:bo6199Fi0rbU1@mid.individual.net...

On 9/03/2014 1:42 AM, Rod Speed wrote:
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Damian <damian_andrews75@yahoo.com.au> wrote

It'a 14 year old digital camera,

It’s a dinosaur.

that still works like a charm with AA bats.

You get a lot better result with a decent modern
camera that has an internal lithium ion battery.

Even a 14 year old DSLR will easily outperform a fixed lens
smartphone.

That was talking about a decent modern
DSLR, not a fixed lens smartphone.

Try doing macro close-up work with a smartphone!

Having fun thrashing that straw man ?

It's true - smartphones are crap at macro photography.

Pity smartphones don't even appear at all in what you quoted.

Cheap modern digital cameras are also MUCH better than most
smartphone cameras.

Having fun thrashing that straw man ?

You said smartphones are better - they are NOT!

Smartphones don't even appear at all in what you quoted.

For $50 you can buy a 14 or better Megapixel camera with x8 or
better OPTICAL zoom.

Having fun thrashing that straw man ?

What part of "For $50 you can buy a 14 or better Megapixel camera
with x8 or better OPTICAL zoom" do I need to explain to you?

Having fun thrashing that straw man ?

You are avoiding the point

There was never any point, just you thrashing some straw man.

Cut the crap.

No need to tell yourself that publicly, just do it.

The only crap here is you changing your story.


You were putting shit on old DSLR's,

And was clearly saying that a decent modern DSLR
with a built in lithium ion battery leaves it for dead.

No, you actually claimed smartphones are better than Damian's SLR:

Damian>> My 14 year old digital camera still fits inside my side pocket.

Rod Speed>Most of us just use our much better phone cameras instead.

............

Damian>> Dunno. The canon digital camera still produces higher enough
mega pixels.
Damian>> And the SD cards are still available for more memory.
Damian>> Doesn't make sense throwing away something that's so flexible
Damian>> and still get the job done.

Rod Speed >Even the iphone 5S leaves it for dead.

Rod managed to get a iwank phone 5S after waiting over six years to clear
the funds.
Now, he got it, he thinks it's some magical gadget that replaces
everything.)
It can even find water in the central Australian desert. iWank phones are
that shmart. )

 

[Damian]

"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:bo6cmlFkgduU2@mid.individual.net...

yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Damian <damian_andrews75@yahoo.com.au> wrote

It'a 14 year old digital camera,

It’s a dinosaur.

that still works like a charm with AA bats.

You get a lot better result with a decent modern
camera that has an internal lithium ion battery.

Even a 14 year old DSLR will easily outperform a fixed lens
smartphone.

That was talking about a decent modern
DSLR, not a fixed lens smartphone.

Try doing macro close-up work with a smartphone!

Having fun thrashing that straw man ?

It's true - smartphones are crap at macro photography.

Pity smartphones don't even appear at all in what you quoted.

Cheap modern digital cameras are also MUCH better than most
smartphone cameras.

Having fun thrashing that straw man ?

You said smartphones are better - they are NOT!

Smartphones don't even appear at all in what you quoted.

For $50 you can buy a 14 or better Megapixel camera with x8 or
better OPTICAL zoom.

Having fun thrashing that straw man ?

What part of "For $50 you can buy a 14 or better Megapixel camera
with x8 or better OPTICAL zoom" do I need to explain to you?

Having fun thrashing that straw man ?

You are avoiding the point

There was never any point, just you thrashing some straw man.

Cut the crap.

No need to tell yourself that publicly, just do it.

The only crap here is you changing your story.

Everyone can see for themselves that I
have not changed any story in the above.

I see you changing your story all the time man.
But, it's ok. You're allowed to live in your infallable dream world.

You were putting shit on old DSLR's,

And was clearly saying that a decent modern DSLR
with a built in lithium ion battery leaves it for dead.

No, you actually claimed smartphones are better than Damian's SLR:

Everyone can see for themselves that I never did in what you quoted.

Yes, you did. Just 'cos my digital DSLR is an older model, you claimed
newer shmart phones(namely your iwank 5S)

 

[Damian]

"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:bo6t1oFo2ilU1@mid.individual.net...

yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Damian <damian_andrews75@yahoo.com.au> wrote

It'a 14 year old digital camera,

It’s a dinosaur.

that still works like a charm with AA bats.

You get a lot better result with a decent modern
camera that has an internal lithium ion battery.

Even a 14 year old DSLR will easily outperform a fixed lens
smartphone.

That was talking about a decent modern
DSLR, not a fixed lens smartphone.

Try doing macro close-up work with a smartphone!

Having fun thrashing that straw man ?

It's true - smartphones are crap at macro photography.

Pity smartphones don't even appear at all in what you quoted.

Cheap modern digital cameras are also MUCH better than most
smartphone cameras.

Having fun thrashing that straw man ?

You said smartphones are better - they are NOT!

Smartphones don't even appear at all in what you quoted.

For $50 you can buy a 14 or better Megapixel camera with x8 or
better OPTICAL zoom.

Having fun thrashing that straw man ?

What part of "For $50 you can buy a 14 or better Megapixel camera
with x8 or better OPTICAL zoom" do I need to explain to you?

Having fun thrashing that straw man ?

You are avoiding the point

There was never any point, just you thrashing some straw man.

Cut the crap.

No need to tell yourself that publicly, just do it.

The only crap here is you changing your story.

Everyone can see for themselves that I
have not changed any story in the above.

You were putting shit on old DSLR's,

And was clearly saying that a decent modern DSLR
with a built in lithium ion battery leaves it for dead.

No, you actually claimed smartphones are better than Damian's SLR:

Everyone can see for themselves that I never did in what you quoted.

Yeah?

Yep.

You sure chose some misleading words, then.

Everyone can see for themselves that I never did in what you quoted.

You're a 'misleader', when it comes to iWank phones my man. Admit it, at
least once for a change. 'cos your maker is catching up with you every
single day.