Lithium Ion standard batteries

Damian · Mar 20, 2014

"yaputya" <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote in message
news:boaq4pFimjpU1@mid.individual.net...

On 11/03/2014 7:17 PM, Rod Speed wrote:

"yaputya" <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote in message
news:bo8innF460mU1@mid.individual.net...
On 10/03/2014 11:35 PM, Rod Speed wrote:
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Damian <damian_andrews75@yahoo.com.au> wrote

It'a 14 year old digital camera,

Its a dinosaur.

that still works like a charm with AA bats.

You get a lot better result with a decent modern
camera that has an internal lithium ion battery.

Even a 14 year old DSLR will easily outperform a fixed lens
smartphone.

That was talking about a decent modern
DSLR, not a fixed lens smartphone.

Try doing macro close-up work with a smartphone!

Having fun thrashing that straw man ?

It's true - smartphones are crap at macro photography.

Pity smartphones don't even appear at all in what you quoted.

Cheap modern digital cameras are also MUCH better than most
smartphone cameras.

Having fun thrashing that straw man ?

You said smartphones are better - they are NOT!

Smartphones don't even appear at all in what you quoted.

For $50 you can buy a 14 or better Megapixel camera with x8
or better OPTICAL zoom.

Having fun thrashing that straw man ?

What part of "For $50 you can buy a 14 or better Megapixel
camera
with x8 or better OPTICAL zoom" do I need to explain to you?

Having fun thrashing that straw man ?

You are avoiding the point

There was never any point, just you thrashing some straw man.

Cut the crap.

No need to tell yourself that publicly, just do it.

The only crap here is you changing your story.

Everyone can see for themselves that I
have not changed any story in the above.

You were putting shit on old DSLR's,

And was clearly saying that a decent modern DSLR
with a built in lithium ion battery leaves it for dead.

No, you actually claimed smartphones are better than Damian's SLR:

Everyone can see for themselves that I never did in what you quoted.

Yeah?

Yep.

You sure chose some misleading words, then.

Everyone can see for themselves that I never did in what you quoted.

None of what you added was ever part of what you have above, child.

Grow up yourself.

He won't, 'cos he can't.
He did that long long time ago. He's beyond that now.
Gravity has taken the lead now. ;-)

Damian · Mar 20, 2014

"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:bobd8pFmpaeU1@mid.individual.net...

"yaputya" <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote in message
news:boaq4pFimjpU1@mid.individual.net...
On 11/03/2014 7:17 PM, Rod Speed wrote:

"yaputya" <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote in message
news:bo8innF460mU1@mid.individual.net...
On 10/03/2014 11:35 PM, Rod Speed wrote:
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Damian <damian_andrews75@yahoo.com.au> wrote

It'a 14 year old digital camera,

Its a dinosaur.

that still works like a charm with AA bats.

You get a lot better result with a decent modern
camera that has an internal lithium ion battery.

Even a 14 year old DSLR will easily outperform a fixed lens
smartphone.

That was talking about a decent modern
DSLR, not a fixed lens smartphone.

Try doing macro close-up work with a smartphone!

Having fun thrashing that straw man ?

It's true - smartphones are crap at macro photography.

Pity smartphones don't even appear at all in what you quoted.

Cheap modern digital cameras are also MUCH better than most
smartphone cameras.

Having fun thrashing that straw man ?

You said smartphones are better - they are NOT!

Smartphones don't even appear at all in what you quoted.

For $50 you can buy a 14 or better Megapixel camera with x8
or better OPTICAL zoom.

Having fun thrashing that straw man ?

What part of "For $50 you can buy a 14 or better Megapixel
camera
with x8 or better OPTICAL zoom" do I need to explain to you?

Having fun thrashing that straw man ?

You are avoiding the point

There was never any point, just you thrashing some straw man.

Cut the crap.

No need to tell yourself that publicly, just do it.

The only crap here is you changing your story.

Everyone can see for themselves that I
have not changed any story in the above.

You were putting shit on old DSLR's,

And was clearly saying that a decent modern DSLR
with a built in lithium ion battery leaves it for dead.

No, you actually claimed smartphones are better than Damian's SLR:

Everyone can see for themselves that I never did in what you quoted.

Yeah?

Yep.

You sure chose some misleading words, then.

Everyone can see for themselves that I never did in what you quoted.

None of what you added was ever part of what you have above, child.

Grow up yourself.

This where I am sposed to curl up and die is it child ?

I can't picture you in fetal position. Your bad back won't allow it.

Damian · Mar 20, 2014

"yaputya" <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote in message
news:bobnouFp1irU1@mid.individual.net...

On 12/03/2014 4:36 PM, Rod Speed wrote:

"yaputya" <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote in message
news:boaq4pFimjpU1@mid.individual.net...
On 11/03/2014 7:17 PM, Rod Speed wrote:

"yaputya" <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote in message
news:bo8innF460mU1@mid.individual.net...
On 10/03/2014 11:35 PM, Rod Speed wrote:
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Damian <damian_andrews75@yahoo.com.au> wrote

It'a 14 year old digital camera,

Its a dinosaur.

that still works like a charm with AA bats.

You get a lot better result with a decent modern
camera that has an internal lithium ion battery.

Even a 14 year old DSLR will easily outperform a fixed
lens smartphone.

That was talking about a decent modern
DSLR, not a fixed lens smartphone.

Try doing macro close-up work with a smartphone!

Having fun thrashing that straw man ?

It's true - smartphones are crap at macro photography.

Pity smartphones don't even appear at all in what you quoted.

Cheap modern digital cameras are also MUCH better than
most smartphone cameras.

Having fun thrashing that straw man ?

You said smartphones are better - they are NOT!

Smartphones don't even appear at all in what you quoted.

For $50 you can buy a 14 or better Megapixel camera with
x8 or better OPTICAL zoom.

Having fun thrashing that straw man ?

What part of "For $50 you can buy a 14 or better Megapixel
camera
with x8 or better OPTICAL zoom" do I need to explain to
you?

Having fun thrashing that straw man ?

You are avoiding the point

There was never any point, just you thrashing some straw man.

Cut the crap.

No need to tell yourself that publicly, just do it.

The only crap here is you changing your story.

Everyone can see for themselves that I
have not changed any story in the above.

You were putting shit on old DSLR's,

And was clearly saying that a decent modern DSLR
with a built in lithium ion battery leaves it for dead.

No, you actually claimed smartphones are better than Damian's SLR:

Everyone can see for themselves that I never did in what you
quoted.

Yeah?

Yep.

You sure chose some misleading words, then.

Everyone can see for themselves that I never did in what you quoted.

None of what you added was ever part of what you have above, child.

Grow up yourself.

This where I am sposed to curl up and die is it child ?

You are pathetic.

Actually, that's an understatement. Rod's gone pass that. ;-)

Damian · Mar 20, 2014

"yaputya" <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote in message
news:boc4isFrrt7U1@mid.individual.net...

On 12/03/2014 9:58 PM, Rod Speed wrote:

"yaputya" <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote in message
news:bobnouFp1irU1@mid.individual.net...
On 12/03/2014 4:36 PM, Rod Speed wrote:

"yaputya" <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote in message
news:boaq4pFimjpU1@mid.individual.net...
On 11/03/2014 7:17 PM, Rod Speed wrote:

"yaputya" <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote in message
news:bo8innF460mU1@mid.individual.net...
On 10/03/2014 11:35 PM, Rod Speed wrote:
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Damian <damian_andrews75@yahoo.com.au> wrote

It'a 14 year old digital camera,

Its a dinosaur.

that still works like a charm with AA bats.

You get a lot better result with a decent modern
camera that has an internal lithium ion battery.

Even a 14 year old DSLR will easily outperform a fixed
lens smartphone.

That was talking about a decent modern
DSLR, not a fixed lens smartphone.

Try doing macro close-up work with a smartphone!

Having fun thrashing that straw man ?

It's true - smartphones are crap at macro photography.

Pity smartphones don't even appear at all in what you
quoted.

Cheap modern digital cameras are also MUCH better than
most smartphone cameras.

Having fun thrashing that straw man ?

You said smartphones are better - they are NOT!

Smartphones don't even appear at all in what you quoted.

For $50 you can buy a 14 or better Megapixel camera with
x8 or better OPTICAL zoom.

Having fun thrashing that straw man ?

What part of "For $50 you can buy a 14 or better Megapixel
camera
with x8 or better OPTICAL zoom" do I need to explain to
you?

Having fun thrashing that straw man ?

You are avoiding the point

There was never any point, just you thrashing some straw man.

Cut the crap.

No need to tell yourself that publicly, just do it.

The only crap here is you changing your story.

Everyone can see for themselves that I
have not changed any story in the above.

You were putting shit on old DSLR's,

And was clearly saying that a decent modern DSLR
with a built in lithium ion battery leaves it for dead.

No, you actually claimed smartphones are better than Damian's
SLR:

Everyone can see for themselves that I never did in what you
quoted.

Yeah?

Yep.

You sure chose some misleading words, then.

Everyone can see for themselves that I never did in what you
quoted.

None of what you added was ever part of what you have above, child.

Grow up yourself.

This where I am sposed to curl up and die is it child ?

You are pathetic.

This where I am sposed to curl up and die is it child ?

Whatever. Your childish broken-record insults only reflect on your own
maturity.

Rod got stuck when he was six years old. Emotionally, he's stuck at that age
group.
It's a Freudian emotional growth stunt issue.

Damian · Mar 20, 2014

"yaputya" <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote in message
news:bog44gFmpe8U2@mid.individual.net...

On 13/03/2014 10:48 PM, Rod Speed wrote:

"yaputya" <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote in message
news:boej31Fdbf1U1@mid.individual.net...
On 13/03/2014 7:01 PM, Rod Speed wrote:

"yaputya" <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote in message
news:bodn17F77d6U1@mid.individual.net...
On 13/03/2014 4:27 AM, Rod Speed wrote:

"yaputya" <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote in message
news:bocc6vFtdn1U1@mid.individual.net...
On 13/03/2014 12:59 AM, Rod Speed wrote:

This where I am sposed to curl up and die is it child ?

You are pathetic.

This where I am sposed to curl up and die is it child ?

Whatever. Your childish broken-record insults only reflect on your
own maturity.

This where I am sposed to curl up and die is it child ?

Is it just a broken-record or is he just brain-dead?

This where I am sposed to curl up and die is it child ?

He IS just brain-dead.

This where I am sposed to curl up and die is it child ?

He IS just brain-dead.

This where I am sposed to curl up and die is it child ?

You have run out of intelligent responses......
A long time ago......

Some say Rod's never had any such intelligent responses. Just quick
responses with super fast googling ability.

Damian · Mar 20, 2014

"keithr" <user@domain.invalid> wrote in message
news:boo1vmFcpr3U1@mid.individual.net...

On 17/03/2014 2:23 PM, Rod Speed wrote:

"keithr" <user@domain.invalid> wrote in message
news:bomtjrF5puoU1@mid.individual.net...
On 17/03/2014 4:46 AM, Rod Speed wrote:
keithr <user@domain.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote

Some gutless fuckwit pom desperately cowering behind
keithr <user@domain.invalid> wrote just the puerile shit
any 2 year old could leave for dead, as always.

Why a POM?

Because he was born there to pom parents, stupid.

Just like Abbott.

He didnt have pom parents, fuckwit.

He has a pommy father,

Not when he was born he didnt.

Unless he officially renounced his British citizenship, he was still a
British citizen.

https://www.gov.uk/renounce-british-nationality/apply

Bet he didn't.

he was born in the UK.

To Australian parents.

Makes no difference.

That makes him a British citizen

Wrong, as always.

ROFL Always in such a hurry to be shown as a know-nothing

Lets see what the British government has to say about it

https://www.gov.uk/check-british-citizen

Check if you're a British citizen

1 When were you born?

Before 1 January 1983

2 Were you born in the UK or a qualifying territory?

Yes

In most cases youre a British citizen

There are only 2 cases when you wont be a British citizen:

your father was a diplomat working for a non-UK country

your father was an enemy alien in occupation - this only applies to
people born in the Channel Islands during World War 2

IE he was born a British citizen no matter whether his parents were
Australian or not.

Suck that up spoodle.

Now you gonna suffer wrath of THE ROD MAN. No body calls him a "Spoodle".

)

Damian · Mar 20, 2014

"keithr" <user@domain.invalid> wrote in message
news:boqka9Ftbu6U1@mid.individual.net...

On 18/03/2014 4:04 AM, Rod Speed wrote:
keithr <user@domain.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
keithr <user@domain.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
keithr <user@domain.invalid> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
yaputya <sir.leftlegin.to.U@gmale.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote

Some gutless fuckwit pom desperately cowering behind
keithr <user@domain.invalid> wrote just the puerile shit
any 2 year old could leave for dead, as always.

Why a POM?

Because he was born there to pom parents, stupid.

Just like Abbott.

He didnt have pom parents, fuckwit.

He has a pommy father,

Not when he was born he didnt.

Unless he officially renounced his British citizenship, he was still a
British citizen.

Irrelevant to whether he was an Australian at the time
Abbott was born.

https://www.gov.uk/renounce-british-nationality/apply

Irrelevant to whether he was an Australian at the time
Abbott was born.

Bet he didn't.

Irrelevant to whether he was an Australian at the time
Abbott was born.

he was born in the UK.

To Australian parents.

Makes no difference.

Wrong, as always.

That makes him a British citizen

Wrong, as always.

ROFL Always in such a hurry to be shown as a know-nothing

We'll see...

Lets see what the British government has to say about it

Irrelevant to whether he was an Australian at the time
Abbott was born.

https://www.gov.uk/check-british-citizen

Irrelevant to whether he was an Australian at the time
Abbott was born.

Check if you're a British citizen

Irrelevant to whether he was an Australian at the time
Abbott was born.

1 When were you born?

Before 1 January 1983

2 Were you born in the UK or a qualifying territory?

Yes

In most cases youre a British citizen

Irrelevant to whether he was an Australian at the time
Abbott was born.

There are only 2 cases when you wont be a British citizen:

Irrelevant to whether he was an Australian at the time
Abbott was born.

your father was a diplomat working for a non-UK country

your father was an enemy alien in occupation - this only applies
to people born in the Channel Islands during World War 2

IE he was born a British citizen no matter whether his parents were
Australian or not.

Irrelevant to whether he was an Australian at the time
Abbott was born.

Abbott was born a pom proved beyond doubt, bluster all you like it don't
change anything.

Argument over. Bye bye.

Roddles is the best arse kisser Abbot's ever had.
Let's not upset the relationship.
Abbotard is not British("POM"). He's 100% true blue Aussie.
If Roddles doesn't believe in the crap, he can't accept the Abbotard.
So, let it be. ;-)

Rod Speed · Mar 20, 2014