L
Lasse Langwadt Christensen
Guest
torsdag den 20. april 2023 kl. 18.01.41 UTC+2 skrev SteveW:
there was a documentary on the death penalty, the interviews of those pro the death penalty was very
much against nitrogen because it would be easy, painless and probably euphoric right before death
On 20/04/2023 15:08, John Larkin wrote:
On Thu, 20 Apr 2023 14:56:21 +1000, \"Rod Speed\"
rod.sp...@gmail.com> wrote:
rbowman <bow...@montana.com> wrote
John Larkin wrote
rbowman <bow...@montana.com> wrote
John Larkin wrote
The old BBC mysteries had murders performed with coal gas. Or guns.
Now they have to use poison or push people off roofs.
Sylvia Plath found it quiet effective. You might blow the place up but
it was more environmentally friendly than what the Japanese came up
with.
https://www.wired.com/2009/03/japanese-deterg/
They\'re polite though. They print warning signs advising responders to
don hazmat suits prior to retrieving the corpse.
Yuk. H2S is stinky.
And people wonder why suicides with firearms shoot themselves.
\"Razors pain you, rivers are damp,
acids stain you, drugs cause cramp.
Nembutal doesnt.
Helium works fine.
Guns aren\'t lawful, nooses give,
gas smells awful; you might as well live.\"
Dorothy Parker
The ideal tool for suicide or execution is nitrogen. Cheap and
painless.
Yes. I am surprised that the US has not used it for carrying out the
death penalty. Especially when there were difficulties obtaining the
drugs that they normally used.
there was a documentary on the death penalty, the interviews of those pro the death penalty was very
much against nitrogen because it would be easy, painless and probably euphoric right before death