Guy Macon is a self appointed OT cop

Guy Macon · May 28, 2004

Activ8 <reply2group@ndbbm.net> says...

I thought it was "Collection Of Piss ants"

Are you confusing "Piss Ant" with "Pissant"?

http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=pissant

Jim Thompson · May 28, 2004

On Fri, 28 May 2004 08:41:46 -0700, Guy Macon
<http://www.guymacon.com> wrote:

Jim Thompson says...

Activ8 wrote:

Guy Macon wrote:

Chris Carlen says...

Jeez, Jim. That wasn't very nice. She might get scared off.
She could be a valuable member of the group. Please don't do that.

I agree.

I do to

I permanently plonked "her" so long ago that I now don't remember why.

Are her contributions _now_ of a sufficient quality that I should
un-plonk "her"?

My agreement was with the theory that she *could* be a valuable member
of the group and with the "That wasn't very nice." comment. I have
not seen her actually contibute, and the facy=t that she ducked a
direct question asked twice has a trollish smell to it.

480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax

Guy Macon · May 28, 2004

Terry Given <the_domes@xtra.co.nz> says...

Whats worse is when morons like DarkMatter (Dark = Fecal?) who abuse others
get labelled as "self-appointed net cops" thereby tarring Guy with the same,
rather icky brush. Besides, I read "self-appointed" as "arrogant, jumped up
little prick" which IMO aint true - hes just trying to be helpful.

Alas, it has become obvious that it will never work.

Fred Bloggs · May 28, 2004

Guy Macon wrote:

Jim Thompson <thegreatone@example.com> says...

Just kill filter on your name ?

Joking around aside, there actually exists a reason why someone who
can killfile would still not want to be insulted by name. More and
more employers are conducting searches on people's posts before
hiring them, and a post with your name in the title could cause some
pointy haired boss to throw away your application instead of passing
it on to the engineering department.

Ehhh- YOU'RE FULL OF SHIT!- and what kind of moron would apply for work
with a moron who reads SED anyway. Something like this would ONLY be a
problem for some deceitful POS misrepresenting their character and
abilities- there are instances where "bosses" have discovered their
so-called engineer employee asking really fundamental questions about
something work-related and indicating they didn't know what they were
doing- now *that* does not look good.

Bob Stephens · May 28, 2004

On Fri, 28 May 2004 08:32:46 -0700, Guy Macon wrote:

Rich Grise <null@example.net> says...

This isn't fair. Al Bundy might be a schlub, but he's no bigot.
And since his wife broke his spirit, he doesn't really care about
the size of shape of women's chests, except to needle Marcie, and
when he's "reading" "BigUns" or going to the nudie bar.

In fact, some of us aspire to attain the heights achieved by the
likes of Al Bundy.

I have only watched the show a couple of times (the humor is not
to my taste) but I saw enough to see that the Al Bundy character
is not someone to scorn, but is instead a good man with hopes and
dreams that were crushed.

Jesus God! talk about flame bait. A good solid six on the Troll 'O Meter
--
"Just machines that make big decisions
programmed by fellas with compassion and vision."
-D. Fagen
(remove yomama)

Julie · May 28, 2004

Jim Thompson wrote:

On Fri, 28 May 2004 08:41:46 -0700, Guy Macon
http://www.guymacon.com> wrote:

Jim Thompson says...

Activ8 wrote:

Guy Macon wrote:

Chris Carlen says...

Jeez, Jim. That wasn't very nice. She might get scared off.
She could be a valuable member of the group. Please don't do that.

I agree.

I do to

I permanently plonked "her" so long ago that I now don't remember why.

Are her contributions _now_ of a sufficient quality that I should
un-plonk "her"?

My agreement was with the theory that she *could* be a valuable member
of the group and with the "That wasn't very nice." comment. I have
not seen her actually contibute, and the facy=t that she ducked a
direct question asked twice has a trollish smell to it.

A quick Google of just sci.electronics.design shows no original posts,
just follow-ups, mostly complaining about OT, with a few replies about
sources of materials.

Is this newsgroup a 'club' of some kind? Do I need to qualify in order to be
considered 'valuable'? Am I only here to suit other's needs?

Jim, you may want to learn how to properly use and understand Google Groups
results -- your 'analysis' is far from correct. Hopefully, your
electronics/design skills are better than your interpretive.

end.

Activ8 · May 28, 2004

On Fri, 28 May 2004 19:22:12 +1000, The Real Andy wrote:

On Fri, 28 May 2004 04:47:43 -0400, Activ8 <reply2group@ndbbm.net
wrote:

I hope we don't fuck too many innocents. I'm not going to sweat it
if we slap the shit out of a few soldiers and if we accidentally do
it to innocents, oh well, I'm sure we *accidentally* whacked a few
with our bombs, too.

Great attitude. Just remember those innocent people in 911 and how
much the world hated it. Funny how most forget the innocent now.

Yeah. Never mind. Lock and load.
--
Best Regards,
Mike

Guy Macon · May 28, 2004

Julie <julie@nospam.com> says...

Is this newsgroup a 'club' of some kind? Do I need to qualify
in order to be considered 'valuable'? Am I only here to suit
other's needs?

You come here and write a post calling me names in the subject
line, and now you DARE to act offended when others give you
the same rude treatment that you gave me? Did you really think
that you could insult people without getting insulted back?

You swine. You vulgar little maggot. You worthless bag of filth. As we
say in Texas, you couldn't pour water out of a boot with instructions
printed on the heel. You are a canker, an open wound. I would rather
kiss a lawyer than be seen with you. You took your last vacation in
the Islets of Langerhans.

You're a putrescent mass, a walking vomit. You are a spineless little
worm deserving nothing but the profoundest contempt. You are a jerk, a
cad, and a weasel. I take that back; you are a festering pustule on a
weasel's rump. Your life is a monument to stupidity. You are a stench,
a revulsion, a big suck on a sour lemon.

I will never get over the embarrassment of belonging to the same
species as you. You are a monster, an ogre, a malformity. I barf at
the very thought of you. You have all the appeal of a paper cut.
Lepers avoid you. You are vile, worthless, less than nothing. You are
a weed, a fungus, the dregs of this earth. You are a technicolor yawn.
And did I mention that you smell?

You are a squeaking rat, a mistake of nature and a heavy-metal bagpipe
player. You were not born. You were hatched into an unwilling world
that rejects the likes of you. You didn't crawl out of a normal egg,
either, but rather a mutant maggot egg rejected by an evil scientist
as being below his low standards. Your alleged parents abandoned you
at birth and then died of shame in recognition of what they had done
to an unsuspecting world. They were a bit late.

Try to edit your responses of unnecessary material before attempting
to impress us with your insight. The evidence that you are a
nincompoop will still be available to readers, but they will be able
to access it ever so much more rapidly. If cluelessness were crude
oil, your scalp would be crawling with caribou.

You are a thick-headed trog. I have seen skeet with more sense than
you have. You are a few bricks short of a full load, a few cards short
of a full deck, a few bytes short of a full core dump, and a few
chromosomes short of a full human. Worse than that, you top-post. God
created houseflies, cockroaches, maggots, mosquitos, fleas, ticks,
slugs, leeches, and intestinal parasites, then he lowered his
standards and made you. I take it back; God didn't make you. You are
Satan's spawn. You are Evil beyond comprehension, half-living in the
slough of despair. You are the entropy which will claim us all. You
are a green-nostriled, crossed eyed, hairy-livered inbred
trout-defiler. You make Ebola look good.

You are weary, stale, flat and unprofitable. You are grimy, squalid,
nasty and profane. You are foul and disgusting. You're a fool, an
ignoramus. Monkeys look down on you. Even sheep won't have sex with
you. You are unreservedly pathetic, starved for attention, and lost in
a land that reality forgot. You are not ANSI compliant and your markup
doesn't validate. You have a couple of address lines shorted together.
You should be promoted to Engineering Manager.

Do you really expect your delusional and incoherent ramblings to be
read? Everyone plonked you long ago. Do you fantasize that your
tantrums and conniption fits could possibly be worth the $0.000000001
worth of electricity used to send them? Your life is one big
W.O.M.B.A.T. and your future doesn't look promising either. We need to
trace your bloodline and terminate all siblings and cousins in order
to cleanse humanity of your polluted genes. The good news is that no
normal human would ever mate with you, so we won't have to go into the
sewers in search of your git.

You are a waste of flesh. You have no rhythm. You are ridiculous and
obnoxious. You are the moral equivalent of a leech. You are a living
emptiness, a meaningless void. You are sour and senile. You are a
loathsome disease, a drooling inbred cross-eyed toesucker. You make
Quakers shout and strike Pentecostals silent. You have a version 1.0
mind in a version 6.12 world. Your mother had to tie a pork chop
around your neck just to get your dog to play with you. You think
that HTTP://WWW.GUYMACON.COM/FUN/INSULT/INDEX.HTM is the name of a
rock band. You believe that P.D.Q. Bach is the greatest composer who
ever lived. You prefer L. Ron Hubbard to Larry Niven and Jerry
Pournelle. Hee-Haw is too deep for you. You would watch test patterns
all day if the other inmates would let you.

On a good day you're a half-wit. You remind me of drool. You are
deficient in all that lends character. You have the personality of
wallpaper. You are dank and filthy. You are asinine and benighted.
Spammers look down on you. Phone sex operators hang up on you.
Telemarketers refuse to be seen in public with you. You are the source
of all unpleasantness. You spread misery and sorrow wherever you go.
May you choke on your own foolish opinions. You are a Pusillanimous
galactophage and you wear your sister's training bra. Don't bother
opening the door when you leave - you should be able to slime your
way out underneath. I hope that when you get home your mother runs
out from under the porch and bites you.

You smarmy lagerlout git. You bloody woofter sod. Bugger off, pillock.
You grotty wanking oik artless base-court apple-john. You clouted
boggish foot-licking half-twit. You dankish clack-dish plonker. You
gormless crook-pated tosser. You bloody churlish boil-brained clotpole
ponce. You craven dewberry pisshead cockup pratting naff. You cockered
bum-bailey poofter. You gob-kissing gleeking flap-mouthed coxcomb. You
dread-bolted fobbing beef-witted clapper-clawed flirt-gill. May your
spouse be blessed with many bastards.

You are so clueless that if you dressed in a clue skin, doused yourself
in clue musk, and did the clue dance in the middle of a field of horny
clues at the height of clue mating season, you still would not have a
clue. If you were a movie you would be a double feature;
_Battlefield_Earth_ and _Moron_Movies_II_. You would be out of focus.

You are a fiend and a sniveling coward, and you have bad breath. You
are the unholy spawn of a bandy-legged hobo and a syphilitic camel.
You wear strangely mismatched clothing with oddly placed stains. You
are degenerate, noxious and depraved. I feel debased just knowing that
you exist. I despise everything about you, and I wish you would go
away. You are jetsam who dreams of becoming flotsam. You won't make
it. I beg for sweet death to come and remove me from a world which
became unbearable when you crawled out of a harpy's lair.

It is hard to believe how incredibly stupid you are. Stupid as a stone
that the other stones make fun of. So stupid that you have traveled
far beyond stupid as we know it and into a new dimension of stupid.
Meta-stupid. Stupid cubed. Trans-stupid stupid. Stupid collapsed to
a singularity where even the stupons have collapsed into stuponium.
Stupid so dense that no intelligence can escape. Singularity stupid.
Blazing hot summer day on Mercury stupid. You emit more stupid in one
minute than our entire galaxy emits in a year. Quasar stupid. It cannot
be possible that anything in our universe can really be this stupid.
This is a primordial fragment from the original big stupid bang. A pure
extract of stupid with absolute stupid purity. Stupid beyond the laws
of nature. I must apologize. I can't go on. This is my epiphany of
stupid. After this experience, you may not hear from me for a while.
I don't think that I can summon the strength left to mock your moronic
opinions and malformed comments about boring trivia or your other
drivel. Duh.

The only thing worse than your logic is your manners. I have snipped
away most of your of what you wrote, because, well ... it didn't
really say anything. Your attempt at constructing a creative flame was
pitiful. I mean, really, stringing together a bunch of insults among a
load of babbling was hardly effective... Maybe later in life, after
you have learned to read, write, spell, and count, you will have more
success. True, these are rudimentary skills that many of us "normal"
people take for granted that everyone has an easy time of mastering.
But we sometimes forget that there are "challenged" persons in this
world who find these things to be difficult. If I had known that this
was true in your case then I would have never have exposed myself to
what you wrote. It just wouldn't have been "right." Sort of like
parking in a handicap space. I wish you the best of luck in the
emotional, and social struggles that seem to be placing such a
demand on you.

P.S.: You are hypocritical, greedy, violent, malevolent, vengeful,
cowardly, deadly, mendacious, meretricious, loathsome, despicable,
belligerent, opportunistic, barratrous, contemptible, criminal,
fascistic, bigoted, racist, sexist, avaricious, tasteless, idiotic,
brain-damaged, imbecilic, insane, arrogant, deceitful, demented, lame,
self-righteous, byzantine, conspiratorial, satanic, fraudulent,
libelous, bilious, splenetic, spastic, ignorant, clueless, EDLINoid,
illegitimate, harmful, destructive, dumb, evasive, double-talking,
devious, revisionist, narrow, manipulative, paternalistic,
fundamentalist, dogmatic, idolatrous, unethical, cultic, diseased,
suppressive, controlling, restrictive, malignant, deceptive, dim,
crazy, weird, dyspeptic, stifling, uncaring, plantigrade, grim,
unsympathetic, jargon-spouting, censorious, secretive, aggressive,
mind-numbing, arassive, poisonous, flagrant, self-destructive,
abusive, socially-retarded, puerile, and Generally Not Good.

I hope this helps...

Jim Thompson · May 28, 2004

On Fri, 28 May 2004 09:54:49 -0700, Julie <julie@nospam.com> wrote:

[snip]

A quick Google of just sci.electronics.design shows no original posts,
just follow-ups, mostly complaining about OT, with a few replies about
sources of materials.

Is this newsgroup a 'club' of some kind? Do I need to qualify in order to be
considered 'valuable'? Am I only here to suit other's needs?

Jim, you may want to learn how to properly use and understand Google Groups
results -- your 'analysis' is far from correct. Hopefully, your
electronics/design skills are better than your interpretive.

end.

21 Posts to sci.electronics.design, 6 of which were complaining about
OT, 1 originating question asking about automatic monitor turn-off, a
few software comments, balance about where to obtain parts/materials.

You remain plonked ;-)

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice

480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax

JeffM · May 28, 2004

keep changing the subject line.
Richard Henry

Nobody else here seems to know how to do it, so of course
I am tempted to show [off] this ability that I and only I have
Guy Macon

It could be that most people are observing the *least common denominator*.
Changing the subject line makes the Google archive look terrible.
I, for one, wish you would stop this practice.

Activ8 · May 28, 2004

On Fri, 28 May 2004 09:02:19 -0700, Guy Macon wrote:

Activ8 <reply2group@ndbbm.net> says...

I thought it was "Collection Of Piss ants"

Are you confusing "Piss Ant" with "Pissant"?

http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=pissant

Yup. Should've gone with my first instinct.
--
Best Regards,
Mike

Guy Macon · May 28, 2004

JeffM <jeffm_@email.com> says...

Changing the subject line makes the Google archive look terrible.
I, for one, wish you would stop this practice.

My basic philosophy is this: If someone cares enough to ask me to do
(or not do) something and I have no good reason to not comply, I do
as I am asked out of basic politeness. So, because you asked, I
will stop changing the subject line unless I have a really good
reason to do so.

Frank Bemelman · May 28, 2004

"Guy Macon" <http://www.guymacon.com> schreef in bericht
news:16WdnfZs1tn2wSrdRVn-hQ@speakeasy.net...

"Frank Bemelman" <f.bemelmanx@planet.invalid.nl> wrote in message

You really are one of a kind. Archie Bunker on his
bad days had more class. Or Al Bundy. And nothing to
compensate.

I would have picked another example.

JT is a perfect example.

--
Thanks, Frank.
(remove 'x' and 'invalid' when replying by email)

Frank Bemelman · May 28, 2004

"JeffM" <jeffm_@email.com> schreef in bericht
news:f8b945bc.0405280949.6d697bf8@posting.google.com...

keep changing the subject line.
Richard Henry

Nobody else here seems to know how to do it, so of course
I am tempted to show [off] this ability that I and only I have
Guy Macon

It could be that most people are observing the *least common denominator*.
Changing the subject line makes the Google archive look terrible.
I, for one, wish you would stop this practice.

Yeah, Google archive really looks ugly now, with all the subjects changing.

Guy Macon · May 28, 2004

Activ8 <reply2group@ndbbm.net> says...

On Fri, 28 May 2004 09:02:19 -0700, Guy Macon wrote:

Activ8 <reply2group@ndbbm.net> says...

I thought it was "Collection Of Piss ants"

Are you confusing "Piss Ant" with "Pissant"?

http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=pissant

Yup. Should've gone with my first instinct.

It must be nice to have good first instincts.
My first instinct is usually wrong!

John Larkin · May 28, 2004

On Fri, 28 May 2004 09:54:49 -0700, Julie <julie@nospam.com> wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:

On Fri, 28 May 2004 08:41:46 -0700, Guy Macon
http://www.guymacon.com> wrote:

Jim Thompson says...

Activ8 wrote:

Guy Macon wrote:

Chris Carlen says...

Jeez, Jim. That wasn't very nice. She might get scared off.
She could be a valuable member of the group. Please don't do that.

I agree.

I do to

I permanently plonked "her" so long ago that I now don't remember why.

Are her contributions _now_ of a sufficient quality that I should
un-plonk "her"?

My agreement was with the theory that she *could* be a valuable member
of the group and with the "That wasn't very nice." comment. I have
not seen her actually contibute, and the facy=t that she ducked a
direct question asked twice has a trollish smell to it.

A quick Google of just sci.electronics.design shows no original posts,
just follow-ups, mostly complaining about OT, with a few replies about
sources of materials.

Is this newsgroup a 'club' of some kind? Do I need to qualify in order to be
considered 'valuable'?

Julie,

I guess it is a little clubby, but that makes it a more interesting
group than, say, comp.arch.embedded, which is tinder-dry. There aren't
actually a lot of interesting on-topic posts that really belong here
(as opposed to the basics group or whatever) so the background chatter
kind of keeps the group alive. Actually, strangers who ask decent
questions are usually welcomed, but we do get a number of
otherwise-strangers who contribute nothing but complain about the
topicality of other postings, and a few of us find this pattern
annoying. We figure that if you want to talk tekkie, just do it; lord
knows we could use some fresh non-trivial topics.

(Hmmm... musing on fast programmable analog transversal filters.
THAT's a nasty topic.)

The recurring issue is: is this group about electronic design, or is
this a group for electronic designers? I vote for the latter, as there
are all sorts of personal/psychological/economic issues that strongly
influence electronic design, and they affect the outcome.

Oh, humor always helps.

Jim, you may want to learn how to properly use and understand Google Groups
results -- your 'analysis' is far from correct. Hopefully, your
electronics/design skills are better than your interpretive.

Jim had designed so many important linear ICs that we should tolerate
his modestly-curgemonny Wild-Westerly opinions. But I wish JT and JF
and a few others wouldn't try so hard to chase the wimmen away.

Am I only here to suit other's needs?

The only needs you should suit are your own.

John

John Fields · May 28, 2004

On Fri, 28 May 2004 09:54:49 -0700, Julie <julie@nospam.com> wrote:

Is this newsgroup a 'club' of some kind?

---
Basically, yes.

It's a newsgroup by and for people who are interested in electronic
design. From time to time, malevolent troublemakers wander in but are
either soon dispatched and sent scurrying away with their tails
between their legs, or converted; whereupon they become accepted
members of the group.
---

Do I need to qualify in order to be considered 'valuable'?

---
Yes. If you don't, why would you be considered valuable?
---

Am I only here to suit other's needs?

---
Basically, yes, (as we _all_ are) unless you have a question which you
need to have answered, in which case whoever answers your question
will be satisying a need of yours. Even then, if someone has a need
to answer questions, then you're here to satisfy _their_ needs as well
as your own, so it's a two-way street of sorts.

--
John Fields

Jim Thompson · May 28, 2004

On Fri, 28 May 2004 11:36:33 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@highSNIPlandTHIStechPLEASEnology.com> wrote:

On Fri, 28 May 2004 09:54:49 -0700, Julie <julie@nospam.com> wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:

[snip]

[Julie]

Is this newsgroup a 'club' of some kind? Do I need to qualify in order to be
considered 'valuable'?

Julie,

I guess it is a little clubby, but that makes it a more interesting
group than, say, comp.arch.embedded, which is tinder-dry. There aren't
actually a lot of interesting on-topic posts that really belong here
(as opposed to the basics group or whatever) so the background chatter
kind of keeps the group alive. Actually, strangers who ask decent
questions are usually welcomed, but we do get a number of
otherwise-strangers who contribute nothing but complain about the
topicality of other postings, and a few of us find this pattern
annoying. We figure that if you want to talk tekkie, just do it; lord
knows we could use some fresh non-trivial topics.

(Hmmm... musing on fast programmable analog transversal filters.
THAT's a nasty topic.)

I don't know about how to attain programmability, but I have another
one working here, but clocked this time, rather than using an
R-C-inverter delay.

The recurring issue is: is this group about electronic design, or is
this a group for electronic designers? I vote for the latter, as there
are all sorts of personal/psychological/economic issues that strongly
influence electronic design, and they affect the outcome.

Oh, humor always helps.

Jim, you may want to learn how to properly use and understand Google Groups
results -- your 'analysis' is far from correct. Hopefully, your
electronics/design skills are better than your interpretive.

Jim had designed so many important linear ICs that we should tolerate
his modestly-curgemonny Wild-Westerly opinions. But I wish JT and JF
and a few others wouldn't try so hard to chase the wimmen away.

Am I only here to suit other's needs?

The only needs you should suit are your own.

John

480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax

Julie · May 28, 2004

Guy Macon wrote:

Julie <julie@nospam.com> says...
You come here and write a post calling me names in the subject
line, and now you DARE to act offended when others give you
the same rude treatment that you gave me? Did you really think
that you could insult people without getting insulted back?

Guy, I'm still trying to figure out what your main complaint is. As I
previously responded, *I DID NOT WRITE A POST CALLING YOU NAMES*. I *strongly*
recommend checking your history and/or Google Groups and definitively determine
what your legitimate complaint is, and if warranted, post a reply w/ a link to
the newsgroup posting.

Your attacks are personal and completely unwarranted.

<senseless blather omitted>

JeffM · May 28, 2004

abuse prisoners...the abuses were merely humiliations
Activ8

This whole thing is an artifact of the 24-hour news cycle
and lame reporters.
Senator Inhofe got it right when he said he was "outraged at the outrage".
If Saddaam's guys were still in charge of this prison,
these prisoners would beg to receive this kind of treatment.

We need to start taking religion into account.
If a guy is going to kill himself in the process of attacking you,
what can you do to convince him it's a bad idea?
Wrap his corpse in pigskin before you bury it.
The word I get is that it worked on the Moros.

Guy Macon is a self appointed OT cop

Guy Macon

Guest

Jim Thompson

Guest

Guy Macon

Guest

Fred Bloggs

Guest

Bob Stephens

Guest

Julie

Guest

Activ8

Guest

Guy Macon

Guest

Jim Thompson

Guest

JeffM

Guest

Activ8

Guest

Guy Macon

Guest

Frank Bemelman

Guest

Frank Bemelman

Guest

Guy Macon

Guest

John Larkin

Guest

John Fields

Guest

Jim Thompson

Guest

Julie

Guest

JeffM

Guest

Log in

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor