R
Rick C
Guest
On Monday, October 7, 2019 at 10:25:48 PM UTC-4, bitrex wrote:
Who has to go to court for camera offenses, the driver or the owner?
Do they have good footage of the driver's face?
--
Rick C.
-+-++ Get 2,000 miles of free Supercharging
-+-++ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
On 10/7/19 10:17 PM, Rick C wrote:
On Monday, October 7, 2019 at 10:01:18 PM UTC-4, bitrex wrote:
On 10/7/19 9:37 PM, Rick C wrote:
On Monday, October 7, 2019 at 12:49:47 PM UTC-4, Rob wrote:
bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
I think it may actually a high intensity array of white LEDs, not a
strobe. People put all sorts of weird crap on the license plates to try
to defeat 'em like IR LEDs or blinking LEDs pointing backwards, and
darkly tinted plate covers, reflective tape, stuff like that. High
intensity visible light flash will defeat any of that low-effort ideas I
believe.
Over here that is an offense that would result in a hefty fine when
you are caught. Maybe that is because most traffic tickets are issued
after cameras have taken pictures some way, and it has been like that
for decades. I believe in the USA for many situations it is required
that you are being stopped by a policeman, but that rarely happens here.
No, traffic cameras are widely used, just not all that pervasively... i.e. not at every intersection. Usually they are used at trouble spots.
The problem I have is that they are often operated by a company on a profit sharing basis with the local jurisdiction. So the company has little incentive to be accurate, rather they have every incentive to issue summons. There is no police officer reviewing anything. More importantly, there is no accuser to question in court. In fact, in many jurisdictions they don't even give you a trial, it's a hearing with a review board.
You don't get a trial because civil infractions, taken individually,
aren't crimes
Sorry, don't understand. Traffic tickets get a trial when issued by a cop. How is this different?
What kind of "trial" are we talking? Around here for civil infractions
like speeding and running red lights you go before a judge and plead
your case to the best of your ability with the 20 seconds you have
available (there are lot of people waiting...) and the judge says "Eh,
no" and you usually leave with nothing but your original ticket and
still a fine to pay. it's that way even if they're issued by a police
officer
Who has to go to court for camera offenses, the driver or the owner?
Do they have good footage of the driver's face?
--
Rick C.
-+-++ Get 2,000 miles of free Supercharging
-+-++ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209