EAGLE Netlist conversion

[Gririg the sadistic]

Keith wrote:

On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 08:56:46 -0700, Winfield Hill wrote:

Keith wrote...
Dart the lethal Clam-starer wrote:
Keith wrote:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
Keith wrote:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
Keith wrote:
Wagdesh the Foot-poker wrote:
Keith wrote:
Bonik the Goober-bumper wrote:
Keith wrote:
Cuneg the Whale-scolder wrote:
Workaholic wrote:
David Sutherland wrote
That, unfortunately, is the harsh reality that is my
existence.
Regards, David Sutherland
All os's suck eggs!!!
A) You've never used VMS then?
You must be lysdexic: MVS rules. VMS sucks smelly socks.
Is that a deliberate tautology ...?
I guess I'll have to leave that question to the humor
impaired.
Oh, were you trying to be funny? I'm so glad you told me.
I tried to on the first post with the smiley...
So you believe that you can enthral your readers with inane
tripe
No, but I thought
BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!! See a fuckwit?
Yes indeed.
Post edits. How terribly original. #3 in the lamer's kitbag.
Yes it is. I'm so glad you noticed that you are such a lamer.

An interesting >>>> pattern is developing.

Sure, and deliberate. ...but now you've gone and spoiled it. ;-)

Are you trying to be deliberately funny again there, Keith? You it doesn't
work, don't you?

 

[Vrurg the rotten]

John Woodgate wrote:

I read in sci.electronics.design that Winfield Hill
Winfield_member@newsguy.com> wrote (in <ce0l7u0kmf@drn.newsguy.com&gt
about 'I've dumped Linux and moved to Windows XP.', on Sun, 25 Jul
2004:

An interesting >>>> pattern is developing.

I understand that Outhouse Distress doesn't do '>'.

Then you don't understand anything at all. It does them very nicely, out of
the box.

Several of my
e-mail correspondents have to jump through symbolic hoops to separate
their responses from my message text.

Tell your correspondents to download OEQuoteFix. They'll adore you for it.
Maybe even chuck you a bone.

 

[Wonig the horrific]

John Woodgate wrote:

I read in sci.electronics.design that Diogenes
diogenes@sinope.gr.com> wrote (in
GTRMc.19575$KU.15576@animal.nntpserver.com&gt about 'I've dumped
Linux and moved to Windows XP.', on Sun, 25 Jul 2004:

You understand wrong.

Well, no. THEY understand wrong.

"I understand that Outhouse Distress doesn't do '>'."

Just a little reminder for the totally fuckwitted cunts who can't remember
anything from one moment to the next.

 

[Ken Smith]

In article <Uc4QxhB3K+ABFwcz@jmwa.demon.co.uk>,
John Woodgate <noone@yuk.yuk> wrote:
[...]

I understand that Outhouse Distress doesn't do '>'. Several of my e-mail
correspondents have to jump through symbolic hoops to separate their
responses from my message text. So a lot of people won't see that
pattern.

I use Lookout Distress for my email at work. It does have a setting you
can enable that is to insert the ">" characters. It works a good 25% of
the time. If the E-mail is in HTML, RTF or the moon is full it simply
won't do it. It does let you export the e-mail as a text file (how nice
of them). I wrote a program that inserts the ">" characters so I can then
suck it back into Lookout. It only adds about 10 extra minutes to
answering a long e-mail so its not too back for a MS product.

--
--
kensmith@rahul.net forging knowledge

 

[Keith]

On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 22:57:29 +0000, Gririg the sadistic wrote:

Keith wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 08:56:46 -0700, Winfield Hill wrote:

Keith wrote...
Dart the lethal Clam-starer wrote:
Keith wrote:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
Keith wrote:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
Keith wrote:
Wagdesh the Foot-poker wrote:
Keith wrote:
Bonik the Goober-bumper wrote:
Keith wrote:
Cuneg the Whale-scolder wrote:
Workaholic wrote:
David Sutherland wrote
That, unfortunately, is the harsh reality that is my
existence.
Regards, David Sutherland
All os's suck eggs!!!
A) You've never used VMS then?
You must be lysdexic: MVS rules. VMS sucks smelly socks.
Is that a deliberate tautology ...?
I guess I'll have to leave that question to the humor
impaired.
Oh, were you trying to be funny? I'm so glad you told me.
I tried to on the first post with the smiley...
So you believe that you can enthral your readers with inane
tripe
No, but I thought
BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!! See a fuckwit?
Yes indeed.
Post edits. How terribly original. #3 in the lamer's kitbag.
Yes it is. I'm so glad you noticed that you are such a lamer.

An interesting >>>> pattern is developing.

Sure, and deliberate. ...but now you've gone and spoiled it. ;-)

Are you trying to be deliberately funny again there, Keith?

You figure it out.

You it doesn't work, don't you?

....easy for you to say!

You can go away now, sock-puppet-boy!

--
Keith

 

[Cork the ill-favored]

Keith wrote:

On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 22:57:29 +0000, Gririg the sadistic wrote:
Keith wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 08:56:46 -0700, Winfield Hill wrote:
Keith wrote...
Dart the lethal Clam-starer wrote:
Keith wrote:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
Keith wrote:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
Keith wrote:
Wagdesh the Foot-poker wrote:
Keith wrote:
Bonik the Goober-bumper wrote:
Keith wrote:
Cuneg the Whale-scolder wrote:
Workaholic wrote:
David Sutherland wrote
That, unfortunately, is the harsh reality that is my
existence.
Regards, David Sutherland
All os's suck eggs!!!
A) You've never used VMS then?
You must be lysdexic: MVS rules. VMS sucks smelly
socks.
Is that a deliberate tautology ...?
I guess I'll have to leave that question to the humor
impaired.
Oh, were you trying to be funny? I'm so glad you told me.
I tried to on the first post with the smiley...
So you believe that you can enthral your readers with inane
tripe
No, but I thought
BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!! See a fuckwit?
Yes indeed.
Post edits. How terribly original. #3 in the lamer's kitbag.
Yes it is. I'm so glad you noticed that you are such a lamer.

An interesting >>>> pattern is developing.

Sure, and deliberate. ...but now you've gone and spoiled it. ;-)

Are you trying to be deliberately funny again there, Keith?

You figure it out.

So you don't know then? Doubt's a bitch, eh.

 

[Ban]

Workaholic wrote:

All os's suck eggs!!!
The problem is that programmers nowadays have lost the art.
And if you never have to do a format-and-reinstall with xp,then you
are not using your pc enough.
And when you do a reinstall,you might discover that you reclaim more
than 50% of your hd.

If you have a 3GB HD and have stored a couple of backup points, yes. But now
we have 100G and somehow they want to be filled...
--
ciao Ban
Bordighera, Italy

 

[Ban]

John Woodgate wrote:

I read in sci.electronics.design that Winfield Hill
Winfield_member@newsguy.com> wrote (in <ce0l7u0kmf@drn.newsguy.com&gt
about 'I've dumped Linux and moved to Windows XP.', on Sun, 25 Jul
2004:

An interesting >>>> pattern is developing.

I understand that Outhouse Distress doesn't do '>'. Several of my
e-mail correspondents have to jump through symbolic hoops to separate
their responses from my message text. So a lot of people won't see
that pattern.

With OE quotefix you can see everything even in colour. I recommend it
really since it puts the sig on the right place, which is down.
--
ciao Ban
Bordighera, Italy

 

[Roy Lewallen]

Paul Burridge wrote:

On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 00:00:50 -0700, Roy Lewallen <w7el@eznec.com
wrote:


Paul Burridge wrote:

. . .
Your reply throws up another interesting question: which model
parameters are essential for adequate modeling of the BJT up into UHF,
and which, by their omission, call the model's reliability at beyond
such high frequencies into question?
Thanks,

There is no answer to that question. It's sort of like asking which
words are essential in order to communicate.


Sorry, perhaps I didn't explain properly. I'm talking about *Spice*
parameters here and there are a finite number of them. Obviously Cje
and Cjb are essential for accurately modelling into RF., but are there
any others that must be included (excepting of course factors external
to the transistor like lead-length and case/ground capacitance etc.)?

I understood what you meant, but you didn't understand my answer, so
I'll be less subtle and more blunt. The components you need for accuracy
depend on what the application is, and how much accuracy you need. A
single component -- a dependent source -- is adequate for a lot of uses.
Two components (a dependent source and one capacitor) are adequate for a
lot more; all the tens of SPICE model parameters still aren't enough for
some others. You either have to have a basic understanding of what
you're doing in order to determine (or make an educated guess at) which
parameters are necessary for the application at hand, or you've got to
toss them all in and hope they'll be enough. There's no magic list you
can use to look up which ones you need and which you don't.

Roy Lewallen, W7EL

 

[JEDIDIAH]

["Followup-To:" header set to comp.os.linux.advocacy.]
On 2004-07-25, Cuneg the Whale-scolder <IdKWJIbKsGAC@alt.binaries.erotica.pictures> wrote:

Workaholic wrote:
David Sutherland <david@bitbucket.com> wrote in message
news:<ccrfd0583p5gpdnb1vuemmh3t60uh6e46b@4ax.com>...
newsgroups untrimmed from advocacy

David Sutherland wrote:
I don't think

That, unfortunately, is the harsh reality that is my existence.


Regards,
David Sutherland
(note **ANTI-SPAM** in reply field)

All os's suck eggs!!!

A) You've never used VMS then?

VMS really sucks.

While highly robust, it's not an interface that I would wish on my
worst enemy. It's only something I would subject myself or others
to if I had some really serious production uptime requirements.

B) Write your own.

Yeah, I think I will hammer out my own automobile while waiting
between compiles...


--
It is not true that Microsoft doesn't innovate.

They brought us the email virus.

In my Atari days, such a notion would have |||
been considered a complete absurdity. / | \

 

[Paul Burridge]

On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 00:27:48 -0700, Roy Lewallen <w7el@eznec.com>
wrote:

I understood what you meant, but you didn't understand my answer, so
I'll be less subtle and more blunt. The components you need for accuracy
depend on what the application is, and how much accuracy you need. A
single component -- a dependent source -- is adequate for a lot of uses.
Two components (a dependent source and one capacitor) are adequate for a
lot more; all the tens of SPICE model parameters still aren't enough for
some others. You either have to have a basic understanding of what
you're doing in order to determine (or make an educated guess at) which
parameters are necessary for the application at hand, or you've got to
toss them all in and hope they'll be enough. There's no magic list you
can use to look up which ones you need and which you don't.

Okay, thanks, Roy. I can see where you're coming from now.
--

"What is now proved was once only imagin'd." - William Blake, 1793.

 

[J M Noeding]

On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:52:59 +0100, Paul Burridge
<pb@notthisbit.osiris1.co.uk> wrote:

Okay, thanks, Roy. I can see where you're coming from now.

why don't you stick to uk.r.a newsgroup and let radio amateurs on
other groups make friendship instead of quarrel
---
J. M. Noeding, LA8AK, N-4623 Kristiansand
http://home.online.no/~la8ak/c.htm

 

[The Ghost In The Machine]

In comp.os.linux.advocacy, Wonig the horrific
<OGf4oS4gJqFY@alt.binaries.erotica.centerfolds>
wrote
on Sun, 25 Jul 04 23:08:46 GMT
<EoIX5pwidz2bD2E759652Q5R3KhWyT3F@alt.binaries.erotica.centerfolds>:

John Woodgate wrote:
I read in sci.electronics.design that Diogenes
diogenes@sinope.gr.com> wrote (in
GTRMc.19575$KU.15576@animal.nntpserver.com&gt about 'I've dumped
Linux and moved to Windows XP.', on Sun, 25 Jul 2004:

You understand wrong.

Well, no. THEY understand wrong.

"I understand that Outhouse Distress doesn't do '>'."

Just a little reminder for the totally fuckwitted cunts who can't remember
anything from one moment to the next.

Pedant Point: Outlook does have '>' capability -- just not by default.
Also, sans a certain patch it can munge the included lines fairly badly.

Followups to aowxp exclusively.

--
#191, ewill3@earthlink.net
It's still legal to go .sigless.

 

[The Censor In The Machine]

The Ghost In The Machine wrote:

In comp.os.linux.advocacy, Wonig the horrific
OGf4oS4gJqFY@alt.binaries.erotica.centerfolds
wrote
on Sun, 25 Jul 04 23:08:46 GMT
EoIX5pwidz2bD2E759652Q5R3KhWyT3F@alt.binaries.erotica.centerfolds>:
John Woodgate wrote:
I read in sci.electronics.design that Diogenes
diogenes@sinope.gr.com> wrote (in
GTRMc.19575$KU.15576@animal.nntpserver.com&gt about 'I've dumped
Linux and moved to Windows XP.', on Sun, 25 Jul 2004:

You understand wrong.

Well, no. THEY understand wrong.

"I understand that Outhouse Distress doesn't do '>'."

Just a little reminder for the totally fuckwitted cunts who can't remember
anything from one moment to the next.


Pedant Point: Outlook does have '>' capability -- just not by default.
Also, sans a certain patch it can munge the included lines fairly badly.

Followups to aowxp exclusively.

[followups fixed]

 

[Lunal the Whale-blunderer]

The Ghost In The Machine wrote:

-- just not by default.

Crapola.

 

[Clifford Heath]

John Woodgate wrote:

Ahem. Nigeria's problems , AIUI, is that there are too many conflicting
'archies',

My Nigerian friends maintain that the military is the robber of
peace in Nigeria, propped up by money from an un-named oil company.

 

[John Woodgate]

I read in sci.electronics.design that Clifford Heath
<no@spam.please.net> wrote (in <410646da$0$18190$afc38c87@news.optusnet.
com.au&gt about 'OT: Cartoon', on Tue, 27 Jul 2004:

John Woodgate wrote:
Ahem. Nigeria's problems , AIUI, is that there are too many conflicting
'archies',

My Nigerian friends maintain that the military is the robber of
peace in Nigeria, propped up by money from an un-named oil company.

Quite possibly. The oil company is supporting the military in order to
keep a cork on the other 'archies'. There is religious dissent,
including Islamic fundamentalism, and tribal rivalries. You may not
remember Biafra, but I do.
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
The good news is that nothing is compulsory.
The bad news is that everything is prohibited.
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk

 

[mehran gupta]

Definition of a Republican vs Democrat:

A man in a hot air balloon realized he was lost. He
reduced altitude and spotted a woman below.
He descended a bit more and shouted, "Excuse me,
can you help me? I promised a friend I would meet
him an hour ago, but I don't know where I am."
The woman replied, "Your are in a hot air balloon
approximately 30 feet above the ground.
You are between 40 and 41 degrees north latitude
and between 59 and 60 degrees west longitude."

"You must be a republican," said the balloonist.

"I am," said replied the woman. "How did you know?"

"Well," answered the balloonist, "everything you
told me is technically correct, but I have no idea what
to make of your information, and the fact is I am
still lost. Frankly, you've not been much help so far."

The woman below responded. "You must be a
democrat."

"I am," replied the balloonist, "but how did you
know?"

"Well," said the woman, "you don't know where you
are or where you are going. You have risen to where
you are due to a large quantity of hot air.
You made a promise which you have no idea how to
keep, and you expect me to solve your problem.
The fact is you are in exactly the same position you
were in before we met, but now, somehow, it's my
fault."

.....Could also be the difference between liberal and conservative....

Mehran

 

[Keith]

On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 04:01:13 +0000, Cork the ill-favored wrote:

Keith wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 22:57:29 +0000, Gririg the sadistic wrote:
Keith wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 08:56:46 -0700, Winfield Hill wrote:
Keith wrote...
Dart the lethal Clam-starer wrote:
Keith wrote:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
Keith wrote:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
Keith wrote:
Wagdesh the Foot-poker wrote:
Keith wrote:
Bonik the Goober-bumper wrote:
Keith wrote:
Cuneg the Whale-scolder wrote:
Workaholic wrote:
David Sutherland wrote
That, unfortunately, is the harsh reality that is my
existence.
Regards, David Sutherland
All os's suck eggs!!!
A) You've never used VMS then?
You must be lysdexic: MVS rules. VMS sucks smelly
socks.
Is that a deliberate tautology ...?
I guess I'll have to leave that question to the humor
impaired.
Oh, were you trying to be funny? I'm so glad you told me.
I tried to on the first post with the smiley...
So you believe that you can enthral your readers with inane
tripe
No, but I thought
BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!! See a fuckwit?
Yes indeed.
Post edits. How terribly original. #3 in the lamer's kitbag.
Yes it is. I'm so glad you noticed that you are such a lamer.

An interesting >>>> pattern is developing.

Sure, and deliberate. ...but now you've gone and spoiled it. ;-)

Are you trying to be deliberately funny again there, Keith?

You figure it out.

So you don't know then? Doubt's a bitch, eh.

I know I can't keep up with your sock-puppets. Someone has to work to
pay for your welfare.

--
Keith

 

[Keith]

On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 04:44:19 +0000, Ban wrote:

John Woodgate wrote:
I read in sci.electronics.design that Winfield Hill
Winfield_member@newsguy.com> wrote (in <ce0l7u0kmf@drn.newsguy.com&gt
about 'I've dumped Linux and moved to Windows XP.', on Sun, 25 Jul
2004:

An interesting >>>> pattern is developing.

I understand that Outhouse Distress doesn't do '>'. Several of my
e-mail correspondents have to jump through symbolic hoops to separate
their responses from my message text. So a lot of people won't see
that pattern.

With OE quotefix you can see everything even in colour. I recommend it
really since it puts the sig on the right place, which is down.

Good grief, this isn't anythign new! Any decent newsreader has this built
in, though minus the virus propagation feechur.

--
Keith