EAGLE Netlist conversion

[Workaholic]

David Sutherland <david@bitbucket.com> wrote in message news:<ccrfd0583p5gpdnb1vuemmh3t60uh6e46b@4ax.com>...

newsgroups untrimmed from advocacy

David Sutherland wrote:
I don't think

That, unfortunately, is the harsh reality that is my existence.


Regards,
David Sutherland
(note **ANTI-SPAM** in reply field)

All os's suck eggs!!!
The problem is that programmers nowadays have lost the art.
And if you never have to do a format-and-reinstall with xp,then you
are not using your pc enough.
And when you do a reinstall,you might discover that you reclaim more
than 50% of your hd.

 

[Keith]

On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 00:07:55 +0000, Cuneg the Whale-scolder wrote:

Workaholic wrote:
David Sutherland <david@bitbucket.com> wrote in message
news:<ccrfd0583p5gpdnb1vuemmh3t60uh6e46b@4ax.com>...
newsgroups untrimmed from advocacy

David Sutherland wrote:
I don't think

That, unfortunately, is the harsh reality that is my existence.


Regards,
David Sutherland
(note **ANTI-SPAM** in reply field)

All os's suck eggs!!!

A) You've never used VMS then?

You must be lysdexic: MVS rules. VMS sucks smelly socks. ;-)

B) Write your own.

Easy. ...as long as the requirements don't require it to compile. ;-)

--
Keith

 

[Cuneg the Whale-scolder]

Workaholic wrote:

David Sutherland <david@bitbucket.com> wrote in message
news:<ccrfd0583p5gpdnb1vuemmh3t60uh6e46b@4ax.com>...
newsgroups untrimmed from advocacy

David Sutherland wrote:
I don't think

That, unfortunately, is the harsh reality that is my existence.


Regards,
David Sutherland
(note **ANTI-SPAM** in reply field)

All os's suck eggs!!!

A) You've never used VMS then?

B) Write your own.

 

[Keith]

On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 00:24:20 +0000, Bonik the Goober-bumper wrote:

Keith wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 00:07:55 +0000, Cuneg the Whale-scolder wrote:

Workaholic wrote:
David Sutherland <david@bitbucket.com> wrote in message
news:<ccrfd0583p5gpdnb1vuemmh3t60uh6e46b@4ax.com>...
newsgroups untrimmed from advocacy

David Sutherland wrote:
I don't think

That, unfortunately, is the harsh reality that is my existence.


Regards,
David Sutherland
(note **ANTI-SPAM** in reply field)

All os's suck eggs!!!

A) You've never used VMS then?

You must be lysdexic: MVS rules. VMS sucks smelly socks. ;-)

B) Write your own.

Easy. ...as long as the requirements don't require it to compile. ;-)

Is that a deliberate tautology or don't you know just what the fuck you're
blabbing on about?

I guess I'll have to leave that question to the humor impaired. What a
maroon.

--
Keith

 

[Bonik the Goober-bumper]

Keith wrote:

On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 00:07:55 +0000, Cuneg the Whale-scolder wrote:

Workaholic wrote:
David Sutherland <david@bitbucket.com> wrote in message
news:<ccrfd0583p5gpdnb1vuemmh3t60uh6e46b@4ax.com>...
newsgroups untrimmed from advocacy

David Sutherland wrote:
I don't think

That, unfortunately, is the harsh reality that is my existence.


Regards,
David Sutherland
(note **ANTI-SPAM** in reply field)

All os's suck eggs!!!

A) You've never used VMS then?

You must be lysdexic: MVS rules. VMS sucks smelly socks. ;-)

B) Write your own.

Easy. ...as long as the requirements don't require it to compile. ;-)

Is that a deliberate tautology or don't you know just what the fuck you're
blabbing on about?

 

[Wagdesh the Foot-poker]

Keith wrote:

On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 00:24:20 +0000, Bonik the Goober-bumper wrote:

Keith wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 00:07:55 +0000, Cuneg the Whale-scolder wrote:

Workaholic wrote:
David Sutherland <david@bitbucket.com> wrote in message
news:<ccrfd0583p5gpdnb1vuemmh3t60uh6e46b@4ax.com>...
newsgroups untrimmed from advocacy

David Sutherland wrote:
I don't think

That, unfortunately, is the harsh reality that is my existence.


Regards,
David Sutherland
(note **ANTI-SPAM** in reply field)

All os's suck eggs!!!

A) You've never used VMS then?

You must be lysdexic: MVS rules. VMS sucks smelly socks. ;-)

B) Write your own.

Easy. ...as long as the requirements don't require it to compile.
;-)

Is that a deliberate tautology or don't you know just what the fuck
you're blabbing on about?

I guess I'll have to leave that question to the humor impaired. What
a maroon.

Oh, were you trying to be funny? I'm so glad you told me. Did you know that
invoking the word humour after a failed attempt at it is indicative of your
not being able to be funny at all? Mind you, that can be qualifed a little.
Watching retards like you flail your arms and legs around all over the place
is funny, even if you can't help it.

 

[Keith]

On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 01:51:41 +0000, Wagdesh the Foot-poker wrote:

Keith wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 00:24:20 +0000, Bonik the Goober-bumper wrote:

Keith wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 00:07:55 +0000, Cuneg the Whale-scolder wrote:

Workaholic wrote:
David Sutherland <david@bitbucket.com> wrote in message
news:<ccrfd0583p5gpdnb1vuemmh3t60uh6e46b@4ax.com>...
newsgroups untrimmed from advocacy

David Sutherland wrote:
I don't think

That, unfortunately, is the harsh reality that is my existence.


Regards,
David Sutherland
(note **ANTI-SPAM** in reply field)

All os's suck eggs!!!

A) You've never used VMS then?

You must be lysdexic: MVS rules. VMS sucks smelly socks. ;-)

B) Write your own.

Easy. ...as long as the requirements don't require it to compile.
;-)

Is that a deliberate tautology or don't you know just what the fuck
you're blabbing on about?

I guess I'll have to leave that question to the humor impaired. What
a maroon.

Oh, were you trying to be funny? I'm so glad you told me.

I tried to on the first post with the smiley, but I guess you're too dense
to understand simple emoticons. The fact that the word was "write", to
which I answered "as long as it doesn't have to compile", should have been
enoguh of a clue to even the most clueless, but...

Did you know that
invoking the word humour after a failed attempt at it is indicative of
your not being able to be funny at all? Mind you, that can be qualifed a
little. Watching retards like you flail your arms and legs around all
over the place is funny, even if you can't help it.

You're right, you are funny when you do that!

--
Keith

 

[Kadaitcha Man]

Keith wrote:

On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 01:51:41 +0000, Wagdesh the Foot-poker wrote:

Keith wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 00:24:20 +0000, Bonik the Goober-bumper wrote:

Keith wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 00:07:55 +0000, Cuneg the Whale-scolder wrote:

Workaholic wrote:
David Sutherland <david@bitbucket.com> wrote in message
news:<ccrfd0583p5gpdnb1vuemmh3t60uh6e46b@4ax.com>...
newsgroups untrimmed from advocacy

David Sutherland wrote:
I don't think

That, unfortunately, is the harsh reality that is my existence.


Regards,
David Sutherland
(note **ANTI-SPAM** in reply field)

All os's suck eggs!!!

A) You've never used VMS then?

You must be lysdexic: MVS rules. VMS sucks smelly socks. ;-)

B) Write your own.

Easy. ...as long as the requirements don't require it to compile.
;-)

Is that a deliberate tautology or don't you know just what the fuck
you're blabbing on about?

I guess I'll have to leave that question to the humor impaired.
What a maroon.

Oh, were you trying to be funny? I'm so glad you told me.

I tried to on the first post with the smiley, but I guess you're too
dense to understand simple emoticons.

So you believe that you can enthral your readers with inane, tautological
tripe and have them rolling on the ground, gasping for breath from roaring
in side-splitting laughter merely because you can type a ;-) ?

Did you know that
invoking the word humour after a failed attempt at it is indicative
of your not being able to be funny at all? Mind you, that can be
qualifed a little. Watching retards like you flail your arms and
legs around all over the place is funny, even if you can't help it.

You're right, you are funny when you do that!

Which is funnier? The mind image I drew of you or your fucked up IKYABWAI
lame underneath it? So much for originality, eh. That would go a long way to
explaining your need to use emoticons to make people laugh.

Here, piss your pants laughing at this

Here, this is twice as funny

Let me know when you can't laugh any more and I'll stop.

 

[Keith]

On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 02:27:22 +0000, Kadaitcha Man wrote:

Keith wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 01:51:41 +0000, Wagdesh the Foot-poker wrote:

Keith wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 00:24:20 +0000, Bonik the Goober-bumper wrote:

Keith wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 00:07:55 +0000, Cuneg the Whale-scolder wrote:

Workaholic wrote:
David Sutherland <david@bitbucket.com> wrote in message
news:<ccrfd0583p5gpdnb1vuemmh3t60uh6e46b@4ax.com>...
newsgroups untrimmed from advocacy

David Sutherland wrote:
I don't think

That, unfortunately, is the harsh reality that is my existence.


Regards,
David Sutherland
(note **ANTI-SPAM** in reply field)

All os's suck eggs!!!

A) You've never used VMS then?

You must be lysdexic: MVS rules. VMS sucks smelly socks. ;-)

B) Write your own.

Easy. ...as long as the requirements don't require it to compile.
;-)

Is that a deliberate tautology or don't you know just what the fuck
you're blabbing on about?

I guess I'll have to leave that question to the humor impaired.
What a maroon.

Oh, were you trying to be funny? I'm so glad you told me.

I tried to on the first post with the smiley, but I guess you're too
dense to understand simple emoticons.

So you believe that you can enthral your readers with inane, tautological
tripe and have them rolling on the ground, gasping for breath from roaring
in side-splitting laughter merely because you can type a ;-) ?

No, but I thought that even a moron (which includes you Kadaitcha,
Wagdesh, Bonik, Cunig, or whatever you're next going to call yourself)
would read far enough to see the smiley and ignore the previous. My
comment was really about VMS, which does suck eggs (or is that the
real burr in your butt) compared to MVS.

Did you know that
invoking the word humour after a failed attempt at it is indicative of
your not being able to be funny at all? Mind you, that can be qualifed
a little. Watching retards like you flail your arms and legs around
all over the place is funny, even if you can't help it.

You're right, you are funny when you do that!

Which is funnier? The mind image I drew of you or your fucked up
IKYABWAI lame underneath it? So much for originality, eh. That would go
a long way to explaining your need to use emoticons to make people
laugh.

Yes, your attemt to sound like four different people is funny, as is your
attempt to draw this out further. What a maroon!

Here, piss your pants laughing at this

Unlike you, apparently, my mother potty trained me almost fifty years ago.

Here, this is twice as funny

Sure, that is twice as funny as your best shot so far.

Let me know when you can't laugh any more and I'll stop.

LOL! I can't stop. LOL! PLease don't show me the bottom of your
sock-puppet drawer! I cant *STAND* it!

Maroon!

--
Keith

 

[Kadaitcha Man]

Keith wrote:

On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 02:27:22 +0000, Kadaitcha Man wrote:

Keith wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 01:51:41 +0000, Wagdesh the Foot-poker wrote:

Keith wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 00:24:20 +0000, Bonik the Goober-bumper wrote:

Keith wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 00:07:55 +0000, Cuneg the Whale-scolder
wrote:

Workaholic wrote:
David Sutherland <david@bitbucket.com> wrote in message
news:<ccrfd0583p5gpdnb1vuemmh3t60uh6e46b@4ax.com>...
newsgroups untrimmed from advocacy

David Sutherland wrote:
I don't think

That, unfortunately, is the harsh reality that is my
existence.


Regards,
David Sutherland
(note **ANTI-SPAM** in reply field)

All os's suck eggs!!!

A) You've never used VMS then?

You must be lysdexic: MVS rules. VMS sucks smelly socks. ;-)

B) Write your own.

Easy. ...as long as the requirements don't require it to
compile. ;-)

Is that a deliberate tautology or don't you know just what the
fuck you're blabbing on about?

I guess I'll have to leave that question to the humor impaired.
What a maroon.

Oh, were you trying to be funny? I'm so glad you told me.

I tried to on the first post with the smiley, but I guess you're too
dense to understand simple emoticons.

So you believe that you can enthral your readers with inane,
tautological tripe and have them rolling on the ground, gasping for
breath from roaring in side-splitting laughter merely because you
can type a ;-) ?

No, but I thought

BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!! See how hilarious you can be without ever once having to
use a fuckwitted smiley face?

 

[Keith]

On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 03:06:38 +0000, Kadaitcha Man wrote:

Keith wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 02:27:22 +0000, Kadaitcha Man wrote:

Keith wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 01:51:41 +0000, Wagdesh the Foot-poker wrote:

Keith wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 00:24:20 +0000, Bonik the Goober-bumper wrote:

Keith wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 00:07:55 +0000, Cuneg the Whale-scolder
wrote:

Workaholic wrote:
David Sutherland <david@bitbucket.com> wrote in message
news:<ccrfd0583p5gpdnb1vuemmh3t60uh6e46b@4ax.com>...
newsgroups untrimmed from advocacy

David Sutherland wrote:
I don't think

That, unfortunately, is the harsh reality that is my
existence.


Regards,
David Sutherland
(note **ANTI-SPAM** in reply field)

All os's suck eggs!!!

A) You've never used VMS then?

You must be lysdexic: MVS rules. VMS sucks smelly socks. ;-)

B) Write your own.

Easy. ...as long as the requirements don't require it to
compile. ;-)

Is that a deliberate tautology or don't you know just what the
fuck you're blabbing on about?

I guess I'll have to leave that question to the humor impaired.
What a maroon.

Oh, were you trying to be funny? I'm so glad you told me.

I tried to on the first post with the smiley, but I guess you're too
dense to understand simple emoticons.

So you believe that you can enthral your readers with inane,
tautological tripe and have them rolling on the ground, gasping for
breath from roaring in side-splitting laughter merely because you
can type a ;-) ?

No, but I thought

BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!! See a fuckwit?

Yes indeed.

--
Keith

 

[Dart the lethal Clam-star]

Keith wrote:

On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 03:06:38 +0000, Kadaitcha Man wrote:

Keith wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 02:27:22 +0000, Kadaitcha Man wrote:

Keith wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 01:51:41 +0000, Wagdesh the Foot-poker wrote:

Keith wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 00:24:20 +0000, Bonik the Goober-bumper
wrote:

Keith wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 00:07:55 +0000, Cuneg the Whale-scolder
wrote:

Workaholic wrote:
David Sutherland <david@bitbucket.com> wrote in message
news:<ccrfd0583p5gpdnb1vuemmh3t60uh6e46b@4ax.com>...
newsgroups untrimmed from advocacy

David Sutherland wrote:
I don't think

That, unfortunately, is the harsh reality that is my
existence.


Regards,
David Sutherland
(note **ANTI-SPAM** in reply field)

All os's suck eggs!!!

A) You've never used VMS then?

You must be lysdexic: MVS rules. VMS sucks smelly socks.
;-)

B) Write your own.

Easy. ...as long as the requirements don't require it to
compile. ;-)

Is that a deliberate tautology or don't you know just what the
fuck you're blabbing on about?

I guess I'll have to leave that question to the humor impaired.
What a maroon.

Oh, were you trying to be funny? I'm so glad you told me.

I tried to on the first post with the smiley, but I guess you're
too dense to understand simple emoticons.

So you believe that you can enthral your readers with inane,
tautological tripe and have them rolling on the ground, gasping for
breath from roaring in side-splitting laughter merely because you
can type a ;-) ?

No, but I thought

BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!! See a fuckwit?

Yes indeed.

Post edits. How terribly original. #3 in the lamer's kitbag.

Never mind. You just carry on believing that you're fun guy.

 

[Keith]

On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 14:32:42 +0000, Dart the lethal Clam-starer wrote:

Keith wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 03:06:38 +0000, Kadaitcha Man wrote:

Keith wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 02:27:22 +0000, Kadaitcha Man wrote:

Keith wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 01:51:41 +0000, Wagdesh the Foot-poker wrote:

Keith wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 00:24:20 +0000, Bonik the Goober-bumper
wrote:

Keith wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 00:07:55 +0000, Cuneg the Whale-scolder
wrote:

Workaholic wrote:
David Sutherland <david@bitbucket.com> wrote in message
news:<ccrfd0583p5gpdnb1vuemmh3t60uh6e46b@4ax.com>...
newsgroups untrimmed from advocacy

David Sutherland wrote:
I don't think

That, unfortunately, is the harsh reality that is my
existence.


Regards,
David Sutherland
(note **ANTI-SPAM** in reply field)

All os's suck eggs!!!

A) You've never used VMS then?

You must be lysdexic: MVS rules. VMS sucks smelly socks.
;-)

B) Write your own.

Easy. ...as long as the requirements don't require it to
compile. ;-)

Is that a deliberate tautology or don't you know just what the
fuck you're blabbing on about?

I guess I'll have to leave that question to the humor impaired.
What a maroon.

Oh, were you trying to be funny? I'm so glad you told me.

I tried to on the first post with the smiley, but I guess you're
too dense to understand simple emoticons.

So you believe that you can enthral your readers with inane,
tautological tripe and have them rolling on the ground, gasping for
breath from roaring in side-splitting laughter merely because you
can type a ;-) ?

No, but I thought

BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!! See a fuckwit?

Yes indeed.

Post edits. How terribly original. #3 in the lamer's kitbag.

Yes it is. I'm so glad you noticed that you are such a lamer.

Never mind. You just carry on believing that you're fun guy.

Never mind, but do get some more sock-puppets. Five obviously
isn't enough.

--
Keith

 

[Winfield Hill]

Keith wrote...

Dart the lethal Clam-starer wrote:
Keith wrote:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
Keith wrote:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
Keith wrote:
Wagdesh the Foot-poker wrote:
Keith wrote:
Bonik the Goober-bumper wrote:
Keith wrote:
Cuneg the Whale-scolder wrote:
Workaholic wrote:
David Sutherland wrote
That, unfortunately, is the harsh reality that is my
existence.
Regards, David Sutherland
All os's suck eggs!!!
A) You've never used VMS then?
You must be lysdexic: MVS rules. VMS sucks smelly socks.
Is that a deliberate tautology ...?
I guess I'll have to leave that question to the humor impaired.
Oh, were you trying to be funny? I'm so glad you told me.
I tried to on the first post with the smiley...
So you believe that you can enthral your readers with inane tripe
No, but I thought
BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!! See a fuckwit?
Yes indeed.
Post edits. How terribly original. #3 in the lamer's kitbag.
Yes it is. I'm so glad you noticed that you are such a lamer.

An interesting >>>> pattern is developing.

Thanks,
- Win

(email: use hill_at_rowland-dot-org for now)

 

[Keith]

On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 08:56:46 -0700, Winfield Hill wrote:

Keith wrote...
Dart the lethal Clam-starer wrote:
Keith wrote:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
Keith wrote:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
Keith wrote:
Wagdesh the Foot-poker wrote:
Keith wrote:
Bonik the Goober-bumper wrote:
Keith wrote:
Cuneg the Whale-scolder wrote:
Workaholic wrote:
David Sutherland wrote
That, unfortunately, is the harsh reality that is my
existence.
Regards, David Sutherland
All os's suck eggs!!!
A) You've never used VMS then?
You must be lysdexic: MVS rules. VMS sucks smelly socks.
Is that a deliberate tautology ...?
I guess I'll have to leave that question to the humor impaired.
Oh, were you trying to be funny? I'm so glad you told me.
I tried to on the first post with the smiley...
So you believe that you can enthral your readers with inane tripe
No, but I thought
BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!! See a fuckwit?
Yes indeed.
Post edits. How terribly original. #3 in the lamer's kitbag.
Yes it is. I'm so glad you noticed that you are such a lamer.

An interesting >>>> pattern is developing.

Sure, and deliberate. ...but now you've gone and spoiled it. ;-)

--
Keith

 

[John Woodgate]

I read in sci.electronics.design that Winfield Hill
<Winfield_member@newsguy.com> wrote (in <ce0l7u0kmf@drn.newsguy.com&gt
about 'I've dumped Linux and moved to Windows XP.', on Sun, 25 Jul 2004:

An interesting >>>> pattern is developing.

I understand that Outhouse Distress doesn't do '>'. Several of my e-mail
correspondents have to jump through symbolic hoops to separate their
responses from my message text. So a lot of people won't see that
pattern.
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
The good news is that nothing is compulsory.
The bad news is that everything is prohibited.
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk

 

[Winfield Hill]

Keith wrote...

Winfield Hill wrote:
Keith wrote...
Dart the lethal Clam-starer wrote:
Keith wrote:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
Keith wrote:
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
Keith wrote:
Wagdesh the Foot-poker wrote:
Keith wrote:
Bonik the Goober-bumper wrote:
Keith wrote:
Cuneg the Whale-scolder wrote:
Workaholic wrote:
David Sutherland wrote
That is the harsh reality that is my existence.
All os's suck eggs!!!
A) You've never used VMS then?
You must be lysdexic: MVS rules. VMS sucks smelly socks.
Is that a deliberate tautology ...?
I'll have to leave that question to the humor impaired.
Oh, were you trying to be funny? I'm so glad you told me.
I tried to on the first post with the smiley...
So you believe that you can enthral readers with inane tripe
No, but I thought
BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!! See a fuckwit?
Yes indeed.
Post edits. How terribly original. #3 in the lamer's kitbag.
Yes it is. I'm so glad you noticed that you are such a lamer.
An interesting >>>> pattern is developing.
Sure, and deliberate. ...but now you've gone and spoiled it. ;-)

How is that?

Thanks,
- Win

(email: use hill_at_rowland-dot-org for now)

 

[Diogenes]

John Woodgate wrote:

I read in sci.electronics.design that Winfield Hill
Winfield_member@newsguy.com> wrote (in <ce0l7u0kmf@drn.newsguy.com&gt
about 'I've dumped Linux and moved to Windows XP.', on Sun, 25 Jul
2004:

An interesting >>>> pattern is developing.

I understand that Outhouse Distress doesn't do '>'. Several of my
e-mail correspondents have to jump through symbolic hoops to separate
their responses from my message text. So a lot of people won't see
that pattern.

You understand wrong. Must be linux lusers: linux makes you stupid.

 

[John Woodgate]

I read in sci.electronics.design that Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr.com>
wrote (in <GTRMc.19575$KU.15576@animal.nntpserver.com&gt about 'I've
dumped Linux and moved to Windows XP.', on Sun, 25 Jul 2004:

You understand wrong.

Well, no. THEY understand wrong. Their e-mails are entirely innocent of
any '>'.
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
The good news is that nothing is compulsory.
The bad news is that everything is prohibited.
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk

 

[Sugak the Menace-acquirer]

Keith wrote:

On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 14:32:42 +0000, Dart the lethal Clam-starer wrote:

Keith wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 03:06:38 +0000, Kadaitcha Man wrote:

Keith wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 02:27:22 +0000, Kadaitcha Man wrote:

Keith wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 01:51:41 +0000, Wagdesh the Foot-poker
wrote:

Keith wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 00:24:20 +0000, Bonik the Goober-bumper
wrote:

Keith wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 00:07:55 +0000, Cuneg the Whale-scolder
wrote:

Workaholic wrote:
David Sutherland <david@bitbucket.com> wrote in message
news:<ccrfd0583p5gpdnb1vuemmh3t60uh6e46b@4ax.com>...
newsgroups untrimmed from advocacy

David Sutherland wrote:
I don't think

That, unfortunately, is the harsh reality that is my
existence.


Regards,
David Sutherland
(note **ANTI-SPAM** in reply field)

All os's suck eggs!!!

A) You've never used VMS then?

You must be lysdexic: MVS rules. VMS sucks smelly socks.
;-)

B) Write your own.

Easy. ...as long as the requirements don't require it to
compile. ;-)

Is that a deliberate tautology or don't you know just what
the fuck you're blabbing on about?

I guess I'll have to leave that question to the humor
impaired. What a maroon.

Oh, were you trying to be funny? I'm so glad you told me.

I tried to on the first post with the smiley, but I guess you're
too dense to understand simple emoticons.

So you believe that you can enthral your readers with inane,
tautological tripe and have them rolling on the ground, gasping
for breath from roaring in side-splitting laughter merely
because you can type a ;-) ?

No, but I thought

BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!! See a fuckwit?

Yes indeed.

Post edits. How terribly original. #3 in the lamer's kitbag.

Yes it is. I'm so glad you noticed that you are such a lamer.

#9.

Never mind. You just carry on believing that you're fun guy.

Never mind,

#7.

but do get some more sock-puppets. Five obviously
isn't enough.

#6.

1. spnak! nice backpedal! You replied so I win. (dance, owned
etc.) You are my bitch. Spank. You are my toy. You are
delusional. You love me. You are jealous. You follow me
around. You are obsessed.
2. Slurp! Get a room. etc.
#3. My rules count. I won't reply anymore therefore I win. Post
edit, context snip, etc.
4. Sheep fucker, fag, native, fuck your mother, sister, brother,
father. Cock sucker, asshole, brain damaged, retard, jackass,
newbie, incompetent, monkey, boring, asswipe, loser, child,
village idiot, immature, paedophile, head > groin, fuck you,
fuck off, stfu, geriatric, amateur, nigger, inmate etc.
5. Testicles, anus, penis, faecal matter, urine, vagina, bodily
excretions, masturbation etc.
6. blink (clueless)
#7. MEOW, repeat, same old ... etc.
8. Typo, spelling, grammar, punctuation, comprehension lame.
#9. I'm rubber, you're glue! IKYABWAI. Lame by proxy, truth
hurts, takes one to know one. So you don't know the answer
then? That proves my point. Get a life, etc.
10. Whine/pout/flip-flop, FOOM self-nuke.