Chip with simple program for Toy

[John Fortier]

"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:ds09pvcq8up3aotkjtcl8ipqrfve8oua54@4ax.com...

On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 18:19:36 -0700, "Baphomet"
fandaDEATH2SPAMMERS@catskill.net> wrote:


"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:hnl8pv8r5esl80juaq80ep45n5qabi5ll1@4ax.com...
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 16:50:29 -0700, "Baphomet"
fandaDEATH2SPAMMERS@catskill.net> wrote:


Nah! He's just like a texas bronco; he has to be trained ;-) Where the
heck
is my resident dominatrix?

---
You better find out, you're gonna need her to "punish" you with that
strap-on up your ass for being a bad boy pretty soon.

Are you a john John? Promises...you give me nothing but promises...but
can
you deliver? I remember a drill instructor once saying that Texas has
nothing but steers and queers...and you don't look like a steer.

---
Sounds like you'd like to move here, since either way you'd wind up with
a horn up your ass.

--
John Fields

1/10

Not everyone here has the same sexual preferences as you do, Jonny boy. A
horn up your ass? Well, if that turns you on, so be it, but could you leave
it there so we don't have to put up with your spray any more?

Is this particular perversion only available in Texas, or is it your own
invention?

 

[John Fortier]

"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:epcapv0h92g12iscithjfu0721gmr3k37t@4ax.com...

On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 06:55:02 -0700, "Baphomet"
fandaDEATH2SPAMMERS@catskill.net> wrote:


"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:ds09pvcq8up3aotkjtcl8ipqrfve8oua54@4ax.com...
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 18:19:36 -0700, "Baphomet"
fandaDEATH2SPAMMERS@catskill.net> wrote:


"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:hnl8pv8r5esl80juaq80ep45n5qabi5ll1@4ax.com...
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 16:50:29 -0700, "Baphomet"
fandaDEATH2SPAMMERS@catskill.net> wrote:


Nah! He's just like a texas bronco; he has to be trained ;-) Where
the
heck
is my resident dominatrix?

---
You better find out, you're gonna need her to "punish" you with that
strap-on up your ass for being a bad boy pretty soon.

Are you a john John? Promises...you give me nothing but promises...but
can
you deliver? I remember a drill instructor once saying that Texas has
nothing but steers and queers...and you don't look like a steer.

---
Sounds like you'd like to move here, since either way you'd wind up
with
a horn up your ass.

Only if it's your horn John...are you making me an offer? - LOL

---
Only in inviting you to Texas, where I'm sure you can find anything
you're looking for.

--
John Fields

2/10

Baph, the poor schmuck probably wears horns, you know, the mark of the
cuckold. That is, assuming that he has enough of a life to actually have an
SO in it.

John Fortier

 

[John Fortier]

"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:8qaapv0qp05igbbme1a05slitlus9frema@4ax.com...

On 21 Oct 2003 03:29:15 -0700, bill.sloman@ieee.org (Bill Sloman) wrote:


You are welcome to join the "jump in and write rude things about John
Fields group" originally founded by Robert (of blessed memory).

I seldom miss an opportunity. Do try to keep it pithy though. Roger
Johansson's 309 lines was too long to be effective, and seems to
grossly over-rate John's cultural sensibility - he is not a
creationist, merely a dim creep who has been shaped by a creationist
environment.

---
Pithy, Bill, not banal.

--
John Fields

Yes it was, wasn't it.

Poor attempt at pith. 1/10. If you want to take the pith, Jonny, you'll
have to do much better than your last few attempts. I know what a strain it
must be not to fall back into your old habit of just lashing out with ssilly
insults and invective, but you must try torise to level of those who deign
to communicate with you.

 

[John Fortier]

"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:dgbapv0dfq3r56305k091j02ibel573idb@4ax.com...

On 21 Oct 2003 03:42:27 -0700, bill.sloman@ieee.org (Bill Sloman) wrote:


Jim, you over-value John as a debater. He seems to have learned his
style of abuse in fourth grade, and failed to develop it since then.
In a user-group occasionally blessed by flames from the unsurpassed
Richard Steven Waltz, John Fields is a one-finger pianist playing
"Chopsticks", over and over again.

You may like his politics, but you can scarcely be impressed by his
abuse.

---
While you may like Steve's excellently rowdy style because you find it
slapsticky and easy to understand, I prefer a more subdued tone, the
subtleties and undertones of which you obviously can't grasp because of
your belief in the primitivity of things Texana.

Oh well...

--
John Fields

If you consider your posts to be subdued, subtle and to contain undertones,
then you are even more divorced from reality than I had at first considered
you to be.

Jonny, you're about as subtle as Godzilla, without the charm.

Actually, Steve's flame posts may have "style", but their content is pretty
well zero. I've said it before, and I'll probably have to say it a lot
more, if you can't express yourself without swearing, you can't really
express yourself at all.

John Fortier

 

[John Fortier]

"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:l5capvkphpqec6qv3a77jd467cb0oema7f@4ax.com...

On 21 Oct 2003 03:45:50 -0700, bill.sloman@ieee.org (Bill Sloman) wrote:

John Fields <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:<1u29pvshrj0cpafh5c6620ge6mepcvlgns@4ax.com>...
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 18:20:39 -0700, "Baphomet"
fandaDEATH2SPAMMERS@catskill.net> wrote:


"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:gam8pv8hghekik4cfq61dcmoc8apt3c5r7@4ax.com...
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 14:58:10 -0700, "Baphomet"
fandaDEATH2SPAMMERS@catskill.net> wrote:


It's truly a joy to read your posts.

---
You _enjoy_ reading paranoid, sophomoric twaddle?

Only when it's good...but then again, how would you possibly know?

---
What, did you also lose your short term memory in VietNam?

It's not hard to figure out from your admission of enjoying reading
Johanson's masturbation fantasies.

You get your kicks from being beaten up by teenage boys?

Explains a lot.

---
Now that makes absolutely no sense to me. Care to explain how you
arrived at that conclusion?

--
John Fields

Most of the world seems to make very little sense to you Jonny. Take your
own advice; do a Google search.

 

[John Fields]

On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 15:16:17 GMT, "John Fortier"
<jfortier@rochester.rr.com> wrote:

Your company employs amateurs? Why does this not surprise me?

Or are you using "dispatch' in the tough guy vernacular, as in shoot 'em up?

---
The meaning should be obvious (to anyone of modest intelligence) from
the context.

For the rest of you there's always Webster and Roget.

--
John Fields

 

[John Fortier]

"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:ijdapvgdv86v7lorpd6m383dr0nbfnqrov@4ax.com...

On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 07:11:49 -0700, "Baphomet"
fandaDEATH2SPAMMERS@catskill.net> wrote:


You have to realize that the people that you are trying to reach (Dark
Matter, John Fields, and their ilk) are monosyllabic cultural
Neanderthals,
lacking any kind of sophistication and intellectual or emotional depth.
They've never had a thought deeper than their next rape fantasy and the
words just go over their pointy, opinionated, narrow minded little heads.


Because they become so frustrated with the pathetically obvious
limitations
of the truly anal retentive,

Interesting phrase. Apparently out of place, but perhaps referring to
the author? A clumsy construct, in any case, by one casting aspersions
on Neanderthals...

their limited vocabulary (such that it may be),
comes rushing out in hilarious epithets when confronted with themselves.


--
John Fields

2/10

Comparing Jonny to Neanderthals probably is casting aspersions on
Neanderthals. Strange that he should admit it in public.

John Fortier

 

[Baphomet]

"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:8qaapv0qp05igbbme1a05slitlus9frema@4ax.com...

On 21 Oct 2003 03:29:15 -0700, bill.sloman@ieee.org (Bill Sloman) wrote:


You are welcome to join the "jump in and write rude things about John
Fields group" originally founded by Robert (of blessed memory).

I seldom miss an opportunity. Do try to keep it pithy though. Roger
Johansson's 309 lines was too long to be effective, and seems to
grossly over-rate John's cultural sensibility - he is not a
creationist, merely a dim creep who has been shaped by a creationist
environment.

---
Pithy, Bill, not banal.

In your case John, I think anal would be more appropriate LOL

 

[John Fields]

On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 15:24:53 GMT, "John Fortier"
<jfortier@rochester.rr.com> wrote:

Bill is qujite right, you are despicable. Rude, ignorant, boorish, boring
and banal, with the social graces of a pigmy hippo. There aren't that many
people who need to know about the 555, and the number there are don't make
it worthwhile for the rest of us to put up withyour purile excresences.

---
You couldn't be more wrong if you tried. The 555 (and the new 7555) are
the best chips that were ever designed for general-purpose electronical
work with the 741 a close second (maybe) and putting them down is
besmirching their designers in a very rude way.
---

Face it, Jonny, you're out of your depth and no-one's going to rescue you.

I did warn you that you would be held up to the ridicule you so richly
deserve at every post, and now, here we go, it's happening.

How's it feel to be the recipient of what you deserve, after so long making
life in the groups unpleasant for others?

---
As soon as someone comes along who isn't a phony blowhard son of a bitch
AND has something to say, I'll listen to them. Until then, you and your
band of puny, ineffectual babboons may as well stop wasting bandwidth
with your drivel, which is not likely to come out looking like the
Britannica anytime soon.

--
John Fields

 

[John Fields]

On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 15:28:40 GMT, "John Fortier"
<jfortier@rochester.rr.com> wrote:

Not everyone here has the same sexual preferences as you do, Jonny boy.

---
Obviously, and at the other end of the spectrum from me is your band of
faggot cocksuckers. (Not that there's anything wrong with that...)

--
John Fields

 

[John Fields]

On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 15:31:16 GMT, "John Fortier"
<jfortier@rochester.rr.com> wrote:

Baph, the poor schmuck probably wears horns, you know, the mark of the
cuckold. That is, assuming that he has enough of a life to actually have an
SO in it.

---
Well, of course I have an SO, and if you also have one I suspect the
difference between them is that mine can knit, while yours is shorn for
wool.

--
John Fields

 

[Baphomet]

"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:vkcapv8ebjfob95oniej638n21118rbcu3@4ax.com...

On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 06:52:21 -0700, "Baphomet"
fandaDEATH2SPAMMERS@catskill.net> wrote:


"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:jn29pvkt5pgm6g6324jrdu5n96vpg654uf@4ax.com...
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 17:56:52 -0700, "Baphomet"
fandaDEATH2SPAMMERS@catskill.net> wrote:


Are you taking linguistics from Dark Matter by any chance ;-)

---
If that's the best you can do, I'm going to have to let you slide,
Barphy. Sorry, but I just don't have time for amateurs.

And you would certainly be the resident expert in that!

---
Yes, I have to deal with, and dispatch them, every day.

Why don't you dispatch your amaturish website to a free server. You could
then save even more money oh anal retentive one.

 

[Baphomet]

"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:epcapv0h92g12iscithjfu0721gmr3k37t@4ax.com...

On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 06:55:02 -0700, "Baphomet"
fandaDEATH2SPAMMERS@catskill.net> wrote:


"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:ds09pvcq8up3aotkjtcl8ipqrfve8oua54@4ax.com...
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 18:19:36 -0700, "Baphomet"
fandaDEATH2SPAMMERS@catskill.net> wrote:


"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:hnl8pv8r5esl80juaq80ep45n5qabi5ll1@4ax.com...
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 16:50:29 -0700, "Baphomet"
fandaDEATH2SPAMMERS@catskill.net> wrote:


Nah! He's just like a texas bronco; he has to be trained ;-) Where
the
heck
is my resident dominatrix?

---
You better find out, you're gonna need her to "punish" you with that
strap-on up your ass for being a bad boy pretty soon.

Are you a john John? Promises...you give me nothing but promises...but
can
you deliver? I remember a drill instructor once saying that Texas has
nothing but steers and queers...and you don't look like a steer.

---
Sounds like you'd like to move here, since either way you'd wind up
with
a horn up your ass.

Only if it's your horn John...are you making me an offer? - LOL

---
Only in inviting you to Texas, where I'm sure you can find anything
you're looking for.

I'm quite sure you've found it all before. It would now be used goods.

 

[John Fields]

On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 15:37:03 GMT, "John Fortier"
<jfortier@rochester.rr.com> wrote:

Poor attempt at pith. 1/10. If you want to take the pith, Jonny, you'll
have to do much better than your last few attempts. I know what a strain it
must be not to fall back into your old habit of just lashing out with ssilly
insults and invective, but you must try torise to level of those who deign
to communicate with you.

---
Deign? Don't make me laugh. You're a supercilious maroon with an
unbridled yearning for adequacy, yet without the wherewithal to attain
it, and you're just lucky that I take precious time out of my life to
eddicate croutons like you.

--
John Fields

 

[Baphomet]

"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:90dapvg979nqhmlcsav7oiebjs6rj3t0bf@4ax.com...

On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 06:58:07 -0700, "Baphomet"
fandaDEATH2SPAMMERS@catskill.net> wrote:


Are you in the closet? So many of your references are sexual in nature
that it makes one wonder. Come on...you can admit it to us. We won't hold
it
against you ;-)

---
But you'd like to try?

It won't work... I'm hetero.

That's what all the folks in the closet say.

 

[Baphomet]

"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:ijdapvgdv86v7lorpd6m383dr0nbfnqrov@4ax.com...

On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 07:11:49 -0700, "Baphomet"
fandaDEATH2SPAMMERS@catskill.net> wrote:


You have to realize that the people that you are trying to reach (Dark
Matter, John Fields, and their ilk) are monosyllabic cultural
Neanderthals,
lacking any kind of sophistication and intellectual or emotional depth.
They've never had a thought deeper than their next rape fantasy and the
words just go over their pointy, opinionated, narrow minded little heads.


Because they become so frustrated with the pathetically obvious
limitations
of the truly anal retentive,

Interesting phrase. Apparently out of place, but perhaps referring to
the author? A clumsy construct, in any case, by one casting aspersions
on Neanderthals...

We've come to expect better of you John. It must be nap time again...and so
early today.

 

[N. Thornton]

You're right, of course. John Fields is an abusive, foul mouthed bully

You are more retarded than roger dodger is. You two should get married.

impersonator? Everyone seems to agree that you are an emotionally
dysfuntional putz. What do you think? Do you think? Can you think? Do you

What a boring thread. Even tho this one means nothing to me
personally, I _do_ appreciate the odd wacko threads that pepper this
otherwise expert newsgroup. It wouod be a duller place without the
various characters that post nuttines once in a while.

I think we have the perfect mix. I cant understand why anyone would
want it moderated. Long live a little spice to life!


Regards, NT

 

[John Fields]

On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 11:38:13 -0700, "Baphomet"
<fandaDEATH2SPAMMERS@catskill.net> wrote:

God, I just love beating up on bullies Go on Fields, "make my day".

---

_You_ do? Bullshit. You're a toady. All you're doing is riding around
on Farty's coattails while he thrashes about wildly trying to repair the
damage he's already inficted on himself.

Amazing! Three clowns, all Bozos! Better tho, (since I'm the cute,
diminutive "Jonny") in order to alleviate confusion, maybe you all can
be Farty, Barphy, and Dopey?

--
John Fields

 

[Baphomet]

"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:31eapv0fn1uf3ba89n37qnj31o5ogb0mht@4ax.com...

On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 07:14:37 -0700, "Baphomet"
fandaDEATH2SPAMMERS@catskill.net> wrote:


"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:sv19pvc2l3hkusefl6qi0mhkkbdcrro3kb@4ax.com...
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 18:23:06 -0700, "Baphomet"
fandaDEATH2SPAMMERS@catskill.net> wrote:


Me too! God, I haven't had this much fun since they made Quaaludes
illegal.

---
That certainly explains the soporific quality of your posts.

It went way over your head...but then, why am I not surprised? Sopor was the
name of methaqualone (the active ingredient of Quaalude) but made by Arnar
Stone.

Was that a double entendre John; if so, you must have tried them
yourself.

---
IKYABWAI (I know you are but what am I)? Yet another oxymoron posted by
J.Fields

Yawnnnnnnn...

Just as I suspected. It is nappy time for Johhny.