Chip with simple program for Toy

[Baphomet]

"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:hnl8pv8r5esl80juaq80ep45n5qabi5ll1@4ax.com...

On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 16:50:29 -0700, "Baphomet"
fandaDEATH2SPAMMERS@catskill.net> wrote:


Nah! He's just like a texas bronco; he has to be trained ;-) Where the
heck
is my resident dominatrix?

---
You better find out, you're gonna need her to "punish" you with that
strap-on up your ass for being a bad boy pretty soon.

Are you a john John? Promises...you give me nothing but promises...but can
you deliver? I remember a drill instructor once saying that Texas has
nothing but steers and queers...and you don't look like a steer.

 

[Baphomet]

"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:gam8pv8hghekik4cfq61dcmoc8apt3c5r7@4ax.com...

On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 14:58:10 -0700, "Baphomet"
fandaDEATH2SPAMMERS@catskill.net> wrote:


It's truly a joy to read your posts.

---
You _enjoy_ reading paranoid, sophomoric twaddle?

Only when it's good...but then again, how would you possibly know?

 

[Baphomet]

"Ross Mac" <macroeng@example.invalid> wrote in message
news:U_Ykb.186874$0v4.14443718@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...

I feel the love!......I think ole TardBoy / DarkManure has turned ya on
each
other.....seems we have a feeding frenzy in the newsgroups....What the
heck,
I'm enjoying it...

Me too! God, I haven't had this much fun since they made Quaaludes illegal.

 

[John Fields]

On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 17:56:52 -0700, "Baphomet"
<fandaDEATH2SPAMMERS@catskill.net> wrote:

Are you taking linguistics from Dark Matter by any chance ;-)

---
If that's the best you can do, I'm going to have to let you slide,
Barphy. Sorry, but I just don't have time for amateurs.

--
John Fields

 

[John Fields]

On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 18:20:39 -0700, "Baphomet"
<fandaDEATH2SPAMMERS@catskill.net> wrote:

"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:gam8pv8hghekik4cfq61dcmoc8apt3c5r7@4ax.com...
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 14:58:10 -0700, "Baphomet"
fandaDEATH2SPAMMERS@catskill.net> wrote:


It's truly a joy to read your posts.

---
You _enjoy_ reading paranoid, sophomoric twaddle?

Only when it's good...but then again, how would you possibly know?

---
What, did you also lose your short term memory in VietNam?

It's not hard to figure out from your admission of enjoying reading
Johanson's masturbation fantasies.

--
John Fields

 

[Baphomet]

"Ross Mac" <macroeng@example.invalid> wrote in message
news:%fZkb.186895$0v4.14445373@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...

You certainly resemble my remarks....there goes that wonderful
"TardMatter"
vocabulary....I can go back months and see the exact same "one liners" and
not ever good ones .....The same tired troll rhetoric: top poster , baby
bullshit, troll, etc.....Come On!....all your words....Break out a
dictionary or do a google search...at least you could find a new insult!
You're so helpless you couldn't get laid in a whorehouse with a hundred in
each hand....loosen up the rubber helmet there DuckManure......and
hey....cut off that medical marijuana before you post!....(I can hear the
little dweeb bonging with his buddies as these kids compose this childish
crap).....

Ross -

Fields picked a real winner to be a butt buddy with, dontcha think?

"DarkMatter" <DarkMatter@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:eiq7pvgebsf53k6fijuk7b32a9cui78u4j@4ax.com...
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 02:29:57 GMT, "Ross Mac"
macroeng@example.invalid> Gave us:

By Google poster, your assholyness, I mean that you run to Google to
get
answers to technical questions.

You're a goddamned retard, boy.

Show me where I searched google for an answer to a question.
You cannot.

You have no ability to answer from knowledge
or experience.

You have no ability to be correct at all. This is a perfect
example.

Just the usual, TardBoy dribble....the 4 or 5 word vocabulary that is
from
group to group..you leave a snail trail a mile long ya little parasite!

You're an idiot. A top posting, total usenet retard.

 

[Baphomet]

"Ken Taylor" <ken123@xtra.co.nz> wrote in message
news:Oj_kb.185104$JA5.4613350@news.xtra.co.nz...

"Jim Thompson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:9li8pvg17skhufn88b50u1bnn65chao3ra@4ax.com...
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 14:58:10 -0700, "Baphomet"
fandaDEATH2SPAMMERS@catskill.net> wrote:


"Roger Johansson" <no-email@home.se> wrote in message
news:5088pvg68rrlfr02ardkfs70nqlrro5rrj@4ax.com...
John Fields <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

Regardless of how I post, _this_ newsgroup won't be moderated, and I
could care less what Fortier does with any groups he chooses to
start.

This group IS already moderated, by YOU, and it has been for years.

I have seen you beat up lots of people who protest against the rough
atmosphere you uphold here.

They have the choice between silently accept your rule, or get abused
if they protest.

They have to join the secret community of tough people or leave.
Those are the rules you uphold.

Heavy Snip...Snip...Snip...

Roger -

It's truly a joy to read your posts. It is so refreshing to know
that
literacy is alive and well in the Western world, in spite of
overwhelming
evidence to the contrary on the internet in general, and usenet in
particular. Keep up the good fight.

You're right, of course. John Fields is an abusive, foul mouthed
bully
who like all good bullies, picks on the weak and defenseless of which I
can
guarantee, I am not one. He is probably off in some bar in Austin,
sulking
since I read him the riot act yesterday. At least he has the good sense
to
lay low for awhile until the heat dies down. Fortunately, I have a long
attention span and it will give me the greatest of pleasure to jump on
his
case at every available opportunity...and I haven't even warmed up yet
;-)

Shoot, I'd better watch my step before I get accused of being a
bully.
Can I recuse myself if I accuse myself? LOL


John Fields hardly needs me to defend him, but John DOES NOT pick on
the "weak and defenseless".

But, indeed, he does have a perverse need to pick on trolls of the
village-idiot persuasion.

If you want to "jump on his case", go ahead, be the next victim, make
John's day ;-)

...Jim Thompson
--
Funnily enough, those harping on about John are names I don't recognise
(maybe I automatically filter out twaddle). In JF's defense, the only time
he's called me an idiot has been when I've typed whilst in a different
room
to my brain.

Cheers.

Ken

Funny, I've been in that same but different room many times myself ;-)

 

[John Larkin]

On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 19:54:15 +0200, Roger Johansson <no-email@home.se>
wrote:

I can explain why there is so much rudeness and aggressiveness in
usenet, and in the society in general, why there is so much violence
and mobbing in schools, workplaces, homes and everywhere.

It is a result of the cultural pattern called creationism

[snipped most of an astounding 309-line diatribe]

Your rant is amazing, certainly deserving of extended analysis, except
that I have code to finish tonight. In summary, it conveys the
reassurance that no group has a monopoly on bigotry, illogic, or
self-righteous prudery.

John

 

[R. Steve Walz]

Roger Johansson wrote:

John Fields <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

Regardless of how I post, _this_ newsgroup won't be moderated, and I
could care less what Fortier does with any groups he chooses to start.

This group IS already moderated, by YOU, and it has been for years.

I have seen you beat up lots of people who protest against the rough
atmosphere you uphold here.

They have the choice between silently accept your rule, or get abused
if they protest.
----------

Oh Roger, quit being such a wuss, he can't keep you from posting!

They have to join the secret community of tough people or leave.
Those are the rules you uphold.

Sometimes your victims do not deserve much more, because they are just
as abusive as you, but you also jump on innecent people who stand for
a more civilized view than your views allow.

Women and younger people are scared away, and you don't care about
that, because in your world everybody have to learn how to be tough
and insensitive, you see it as a way of growing up, so to speak.

I can explain why there is so much rudeness and aggressiveness in
usenet, and in the society in general, why there is so much violence
and mobbing in schools, workplaces, homes and everywhere.

It is a result of the cultural pattern called creationism which we
live in. The creationists don't think humans are good enough as they
are naturally, they think we have to be trained to be tough and that
love has to be created. They "create" men out of boys and train girls
from early teenage years to be very strong willed and romantic, so
they can keep the men very happy no matter how badly these men treat
their minds and their social world.
----------------

You're ignoring some basic features of human nature, which is precisely
why MY ideal Communist society is a lot more realistic than your
"amazing magic communism" where you don't even make people work to eat.

You assume that all evil in people is produced by rightist religion
and "creationism", when it isn't, some of it is produced by abuse by
others which is BOTH intentful AND accidental, and also circumstantial
abuse by circumstances and bad luck. People will always be capable of
"being mean", and not all of it either CAN or even SHOULD be made
illegal or be eliminated, because it forms the basis for both criticism
AND the very rejection of stupidity that YOU'RE DOING HERE!!!

Much of what you say below is apt, but it is only your half of the
truth. Some people whine to get attention, it is a manipulation.
-Steve

These creationist men are speed-freaks. They have found a way to
combine anger and love to a state of mind they call God.
They feel all-powerful, and wise beyond all limits, because their
minds are so excited that they can think extremely fast.
And when you can think that fast it doesn't matter how stupid you are,
you can still feel infinitely wise and have mental and social power
over more natural people. That is what they call "the holy spirit".

They have lost all taste and sensibility and base their actions on the
idea that we all have to become totally evil to be free from emotional
bounds. They have no moderation and class, they have simplified their
world to take into consideration only half of the equation, the
problem of being free. They have forgotten the other half, to be human
and to be nice to others. They compensate mental drunkenness with a
lot of violence.

So these creationists train their children to be tough and when they
meet more relaxed and natural children in school mobbing is the
result. The children who are trained to handle violence, who live with
violence and rudeness and aggressive attitudes are socially stronger
than the more natural children.

So they call the natural children "motherfuckers" and mob them until
the natural children learn to be violent minds too.

We have been trying to abolish creationism for thousands of years, we
have gotten rid of religion in the modern world, we have had womens
liberation and laws which are not gender specific anymore, we have
taken all religion out of the official laws, we have human rights,
individual freedom, democracy instead of theocracy, etc..

But in the reality, in the social field, we still have these old
creationist traditions which result in social processes which are used
to force boys to grow up to men, to force us into gender roles, to
create "eternal love" and "holy marriages", to create "the holy
spirit".

It is like normal people are wrestling with muscle builders for the
power in the world. The normal people have taken away all the old
justifications for the creationist system, we have reformed the laws,
but in the social reality we still have the old traditional patterns,
backed up by the social power of mental muscle builders on steroids.

In Poland a few weeks ago there was a national scandal over the
situation in the schools.
For some reason somebody had used a video camera in a classroom, where
the boys in the class, 14-15 year olds, harassed the teacher badly.
They trained karate kick towards his face, they hit him and called him
dirty words.

This was shown on national television. The principal of the school
held a speech to the pupils are was very upset over how they behaved.

A boy from the class was interviewed on tv. He said: "But he didn't
defend himself, and then it is normal to do this.. isn't it?"

He looked surprised, like somebody had just taken away one set of
rules and replaced them with another set of rules, and now he was
suddenly guilty of a big offence according to the new rules, although
he had followed the other set of rules perfectly.

This is the situation we subject our children too, they are torn
between two sets of rules. The rules they learn in the social life, to
be tough and cool, and to hunt down those damned motherfuckers and
torture them, and the other set of rules, the official laws which say
that you should be nice and that it is not allowed to threaten others,
it is not allowed to harass other or to use rude and aggressive
language.

So what should the children believe in? The nice official set of
rules, or the tough set of rules they learn in their social life and
in violent computer games, in violent movies and tv-series?

Most people do not know that we are trying to abolish this old
lifestyle of creationism, so they engage to 100% in making other
people tougher and tougher, and all means are allowed.
They admire the people who are totally senseless, who can kill and
torture others, that is why there are so many movies about tough men,
and women too nowadays.

They are trying to abolish the patriarchal society by making everybody
into men, with violent minds, women and children too.
The most creationist country in the world is USA, that is why it is
also the most violent country in the world, and they have the large
part of the population in prison, and they export violent movies,
tv-series, computer games, and the US-americans are the rudest and
most aggressive people in usenet.

But now they have exported their violent culture to many other parts
of the world, so we see young kids in baseball caps training karate
kicks towards other children here in Europe too, and the gangster rap
culture is getting stronger all over the world.

The speed freak kind of love is based on hidden violence.
But now we have come to a point in the human history where the
violence is not very hidden anymore. Now we have to do something about
this cultural pattern.
We have to realize that a speeded mind is not a good thing, that the
traditions and social processes involved in the creationist culture
are very detrimental to this world.
It produces very strong conviction, strong willed people, minds filled
with violence. It produces restlessness, workaholism, drug use,
violence, fundamentalism, terrorism.

One problem is that most people do not understand that they have been
manipulated and trained to handle ever increasing levels of stress,
they think it is just natural to "grow up and take responsibility for
your emotions and your social life", they have no idea what traditions
have formed their personalities and why they like to drink alcohol and
watch violent movies.
They have simply gotten used to it.

They live at a constantly high level of stress, they handle it by
working hard, or by being obsessed. Obsessed by sex, or gambling, or
sports, or some other way to keep up the speed in their brains.
A lot of people use drugs of some sort, sleeping pills, etc..
Or they are very much into some type of conviction, like being
religious, patriotic, nationalistic, or they are obsessed fans of a
football club, or they are in love, which is also a form of
conviction.

The lovers convince each other that everything is alright, that they
are happy. Or they use alcohol to forget how they really feel inside
their tortured souls.
Or they are listening to music, to take their minds off the real
feelings they have inside.
Very concentrated minds, learn to handle high levels of excitement.

Such people are very easy to handle for the rulers, because they are
totally occupied with their own minds, keeping an eye on themselves
and everybody else. These people are very strong willed, they convince
themselves all the time that they feel fine, that they are extremely
intelligent and that they have total control over everything.

That is why we often see people who are convinced that they have
invented something very important, like a machine that goes faster
than light, and there is no way in hell you can explain to them that
they have made a mistake.
They have trained for so long to defend their own minds against others
so they will never listen to rational arguments.
They are examples of what creationism does to our minds.
Most people in the world are totally whacked mentally, they have
gotten used to living on a very high excitement level.

Few know how to remove themselves from all sources of stress and know
how to let their minds wind down and get some real rest.
Most people get restless and go crazy when it gets too quiet and too
peaceful. They have gotten used to high mental intensity levels.

The children have to get used to this intensity during their childhood
and youth, and many children have problems with this.

We all have problems with all the thoughts and emotions running
through our heads, and the social relations problems, which are also a
result of this old cultural pattern, the admiration for violent and
strong minds.

Creationism is also the reason why many newsgroups are in the hands of
a few tough people who act as netcops. They are habitually rude
towards newcomers, tell people to do the work by themselves, and
control the activity in the newsgroup.

Such people handle the stress in their minds by filling their time
with an occupation, to control a certain newsgroup, they fill their
minds with a strong conviction, that they are doing the right thing,
and they harbor a certain amount of violence in their minds, which
they direct at others who do not follow the rules.

Terrorists are doing just the same. They fill their minds with a
strong conviction, with something to do, and a certain amount of
violence.

Violent criminals do the same thing. They may harbor a strong hatred
of prostitutes, they stalk prostitutes and kill them, and they have
strong convictions that they are doing the right thing.

People who kill doctors who perform abortions in USA are doing the
same thing. They fill their minds with something to believe in,
something to do, and a certain amount of violence.

Because of creationism we also live in a very confused intellectual
world, filled with lies and secrets, and enormous amounts of
misunderstood ideas.

Creationists love languages which require high concentration to
understand, like perl, or unix documentation. They hate when people
explain things in simple and plain english, so anybody can understand
it. They have a team-spirit which is based on very high concentration
and tough rules, and a rude atmosphere. They don't want to be "too
obvious", because it would make it easy for anybody, not just the very
concentrated minds.
People who are simple, natural, nice and a bit naive are seen as
enemies who go against that team spirit.

Ever wondered why art is so strange?
Well, no you know why. It is because the creationist culture we live
in inspire people to be strange, and express themselves in cryptic,
non-obvious ways, and some take it further than others.

Speed freaks often have a strong need to be "respected", so they try
to look scary. They would risk being laughed at if they don't scare
people. A gangster rapper with tattoos, black leather clothes and
other signs of violence and power could easily be laughed at if he
couldn't look dangerous enough to gain some "respect".
Somebody who do silly things and dresses in silly clothes needs
violence to get some "respect" and avoid being laughed at.

People who are respected for real reasons have no need to demand
respect from others.

Speed-freaks brains are filled with the holy ghost, a state of mind
based on a balance between good and evil, pain and love, fear and
conviction, anger and will power.

They are absolutely convinced that everybody else would like to become
born again creationist if they only knew how wonderful it is, and if
they could get there, so they gladly "help" others to become more
determined, more angry, to achieve the state of mind we call the holy
ghost.
That is why they do not hesitate to spread a lot of negativity and
negativity in newsgroups, they love that tough atmosphere themselves,
and they are convinced that others also need to learn to live with the
help of a lot of will power.

One wonders if such people have friends or are married.
Imagine having such a person as a friend, who always tell you to do
your own homework, read the fucking manual, and other less positive
ways to express oneself.

Don't they have any friends, are they living completely alone?
Or are they schizofrenic, so they are nice and forgiving towards their
wifes and children, and nasty towards everybody else?

That is the religious idea of the holy marriage, that you can only be
nice inside your own family, and they are completely different outside
the family.

We have been trying to abolish that system, those traditions, for
thousands of years, but they still linger on in the less educated
parts of the population.
Creationism is still a source of rudeness, agressivity, and violence,
in media, in schools, in workplaces, in the society.

They call themselves "aware", "awake", "responsible", but they are
just full of trickery, deception, violence and evil.
They are dominating the social life with their deceptive ways, and
they feel justified in their evil deeds because they assume that
everybody would like to be a speed-freak if they only knew how nice it
is, how you can feel powerful and smart compared to the relaxed and
natural people.

Creationism has lost ground to humanism steadily for thousands of
years, except for the last 20 years when it seems to have gained
influence again. Probably because of modern mass media, which have
spread the US-american creationist views and culture over the world,
which has led to a substantial degradation of the cultural life in
many parts of the world. The cultural freedom of the 60-ies which
produced lots of different kinds of music and social freedom has been
replaced by a monoculture which is very influenced by creationism and
violence.

Ever wondered why billions of youngsters over the world admire
gangsterlike rapper types who look like they should belong in a prison
rather than to be admired as "singers"?
Well, now you know why.

With God on our side..
Roger J.
----------

-Steve
--
-Steve Walz rstevew@armory.com ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public

 

[DarkMatter]

On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 19:54:15 +0200, Roger Johansson <no-email@home.se>
Gave us:

This group IS already moderated, by YOU, and it has been for years.

I have seen you beat up lots of people who protest against the rough
atmosphere you uphold here.

The idiots come out of the woodwork!

Keeerimany!

You're a goddamned usenet retard for sure with that troll boy
tirade. Cut n paste trolls, we got now.

 

[DarkMatter]

On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 14:58:10 -0700, "Baphomet"
<fandaDEATH2SPAMMERS@catskill.net> Gave us:

You're right, of course. John Fields is an abusive, foul mouthed bully
who like all good bullies, picks on the weak and defenseless of which I can
guarantee, I am not one. He is probably off in some bar in Austin, sulking
since I read him the riot act yesterday.

You are more retarded than roger dodger is. You two should get
married.

 

[DarkMatter]

On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 04:15:44 GMT, "R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com>
Gave us:

Oh Roger, quit being such a wuss,

Did your lame ass have to quote all 300 lines of his shit tripe to
post your 30 odd lines of shit tripe?

 

[Roger Johansson]

John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandSNIPtechTHISnologyPLEASE.com> wrote:

Your rant is amazing, certainly deserving of extended analysis, except
that I have code to finish tonight. In summary, it conveys the
reassurance that no group has a monopoly on bigotry, illogic, or
self-righteous prudery.

My views are the result of a long study of the problems of mankind,
both in world literature, in my own reality and through media.

When you look at what is shown on tv every night you might wonder
where all this violence comes from. Not only the real violence in the
news, but also all the violence in movies and tv series.
And the violence in people's faces and voices, if you are sensible
enough to see it.

Think of what we could do if most people were not occupied with
filling their lives with a lot of meaningless stuff, and violence.

Mankind is paralyzed by a cultural pattern which creates a need in
people to fill the emptyness in their lives, they fill it with
obsessions like sex, music, work, hate, love, bitterness, drugs,
games, anything to take their mind off reality.

The reason is an old power system, a mind control system which earlier
had a religious form, today it has taken on new forms but the old
traditions live on as social processes.

It takes only half an hour for me to explain what I have to say, but
it usually takes years to help a typical reader overcome all the
objections to my ideas he has been impregnated with.

The reason for that is that the culture we live in has built up a lot
of reasons and justifications for the lifestyle most people follow,
and these ideas fill people's minds with justifications for the way
they have been taught to live.
When people are forced to live at a high stress level they find
reasons whu it has to be like that. It is easier for them to change
their own way of seeing the world than to change the world for the
better.

People who try to change the world for the better are called whiners
or sissies. It is more manly to accept a tough world and make it even
tougher.

People learn to be devious and streetsmart, they become experienced
and learn how to fool the simple and naive people.
It becomes an ideal to be tough and smart, to learn to handle a lot of
stress.

People who are trained to be tough and devious have social and mental
power over more natural and uncomplicated people.
The tough people can always escalate themselves out of any problems,
the less tough ones are not prepared to go to higher levels of
toughness and violence.

It has become an ideal to be always on the guard, always ready for a
devious social game, and the people who are not aware of this ideal
are victimized and harassed until they learn the secret rules of this
cultural pattern.

This system leads to a situation where people are so occupied with
keeping an eye on themselves and others that they cannot relax and
find peace of mind. This is the reason why they always occupy
themselves with something, and why they feel a need to drink alcohol.

It is a painful situation to live in, it is unnatural to be constantly
exited and ready for devious social games.
They try to ease the pain and find relief, or occupy themselves with
something as they cannot afford to relax for real.

To be constantly exited has become the norm, instead of being relaxed.
There are many forms of excitation, hate, love, deviousness, fear,
concentration, etc..

In the social life the norm should be to be relaxed, not ready for all
sorts of foul play and violence.

We have a faulty ideal in this culture, and we need to realize how
much problems it causes and change our ideals.

The concentrated and excited people need to understand that they have
to learn to relax, learn to forget the training they have been
subjected to. We should lower the levels of violence instead of
training everybody to ever higher levels of violence.

--
Roger J.

(My email address is a spam trap, don't use it)

 

[Bill Sloman]

John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandSNIPtechTHISnologyPLEASE.com> wrote in message news:<4l79pv8el6jn912h857a35pbh8p7rlmtv5@4ax.com>...

On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 19:54:15 +0200, Roger Johansson <no-email@home.se
wrote:

I can explain why there is so much rudeness and aggressiveness in
usenet, and in the society in general, why there is so much violence
and mobbing in schools, workplaces, homes and everywhere.

It is a result of the cultural pattern called creationism


[snipped most of an astounding 309-line diatribe]

Your rant is amazing, certainly deserving of extended analysis, except
that I have code to finish tonight. In summary, it conveys the
reassurance that no group has a monopoly on bigotry, illogic, or
self-righteous prudery.

You may be able to defend the "bigotry" and the "illogic" but my scan
of the excessively long (if well intentioned) diatribe didn't light on
anything that struck me as "self-righteous prudery". Care to snip and
post the offending line?

------
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen

 

[Bill Sloman]

"John Fortier" <jfortier@rochester.rr.com> wrote in message news:<VAXkb.7435$%a2.5762@twister.nyroc.rr.com>...

"Baphomet" <fandaDEATH2SPAMMERS@catskill.net> wrote in message
news:vp8c27ml08sp7c@corp.supernews.com...

"Roger Johansson" <no-email@home.se> wrote in message
news:5088pvg68rrlfr02ardkfs70nqlrro5rrj@4ax.com...
John Fields <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

Regardless of how I post, _this_ newsgroup won't be moderated, and I
could care less what Fortier does with any groups he chooses to start.

This group IS already moderated, by YOU, and it has been for years.

I have seen you beat up lots of people who protest against the rough
atmosphere you uphold here.

They have the choice between silently accept your rule, or get abused
if they protest.

They have to join the secret community of tough people or leave.
Those are the rules you uphold.

Heavy Snip...Snip...Snip...

Roger -

It's truly a joy to read your posts. It is so refreshing to know that
literacy is alive and well in the Western world, in spite of overwhelming
evidence to the contrary on the internet in general, and usenet in
particular. Keep up the good fight.

You're right, of course. John Fields is an abusive, foul mouthed bully
who like all good bullies, picks on the weak and defenseless of which I
can
guarantee, I am not one. He is probably off in some bar in Austin, sulking
since I read him the riot act yesterday. At least he has the good sense to
lay low for awhile until the heat dies down. Fortunately, I have a long
attention span and it will give me the greatest of pleasure to jump on his
case at every available opportunity...and I haven't even warmed up yet ;-)

Shoot, I'd better watch my step before I get accused of being a bully.
Can I recuse myself if I accuse myself? LOL



Wanna form a posse?

You are welcome to join the "jump in and write rude things about John
Fields group" originally founded by Robert (of blessed memory).

I seldom miss an opportunity. Do try to keep it pithy though. Roger
Johansson's 309 lines was too long to be effective, and seems to
grossly over-rate John's cultural sensibility - he is not a
creationist, merely a dim creep who has been shaped by a creationist
environment.

-------
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen

 

[Bill Sloman]

John Fields <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message news:<97l8pvcb1pb5qpbvdi9edjodrhhvshfdh7@4ax.com>...

On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 20:29:41 GMT, "John Fortier"
jfortier@rochester.rr.com> wrote:


"Baphomet" <fandaDEATH2SPAMMERS@catskill.net> wrote in message
news:vp8c27ml08sp7c@corp.supernews.com...

"Roger Johansson" <no-email@home.se> wrote in message
news:5088pvg68rrlfr02ardkfs70nqlrro5rrj@4ax.com...
John Fields <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

Regardless of how I post, _this_ newsgroup won't be moderated, and I
could care less what Fortier does with any groups he chooses to start.

This group IS already moderated, by YOU, and it has been for years.

I have seen you beat up lots of people who protest against the rough
atmosphere you uphold here.

They have the choice between silently accept your rule, or get abused
if they protest.

They have to join the secret community of tough people or leave.
Those are the rules you uphold.

Heavy Snip...Snip...Snip...

Roger -

It's truly a joy to read your posts. It is so refreshing to know that
literacy is alive and well in the Western world, in spite of overwhelming
evidence to the contrary on the internet in general, and usenet in
particular. Keep up the good fight.

You're right, of course. John Fields is an abusive, foul mouthed bully
who like all good bullies, picks on the weak and defenseless of which I
can
guarantee, I am not one. He is probably off in some bar in Austin, sulking
since I read him the riot act yesterday. At least he has the good sense to
lay low for awhile until the heat dies down. Fortunately, I have a long
attention span and it will give me the greatest of pleasure to jump on his
case at every available opportunity...and I haven't even warmed up yet ;-)

Shoot, I'd better watch my step before I get accused of being a bully.
Can I recuse myself if I accuse myself? LOL



Wanna form a posse?

---
If you three pukes are going to be in it it should be called a pusse.

There you go again, assuming that everybody who thinks that you are an
arse-hole is sexually interested. The message you need to appreciate
is that we find you despicable, not desireable, and that we'd like
*you* to put a cork in it, rather than have you hanging it out in the
hope of more complimentary insertions.

--------
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen

 

[Bill Sloman]

Jim Thompson <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote in message news:<9li8pvg17skhufn88b50u1bnn65chao3ra@4ax.com>...

On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 14:58:10 -0700, "Baphomet"
fandaDEATH2SPAMMERS@catskill.net> wrote:


"Roger Johansson" <no-email@home.se> wrote in message
news:5088pvg68rrlfr02ardkfs70nqlrro5rrj@4ax.com...
John Fields <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

Regardless of how I post, _this_ newsgroup won't be moderated, and I
could care less what Fortier does with any groups he chooses to start.

This group IS already moderated, by YOU, and it has been for years.

I have seen you beat up lots of people who protest against the rough
atmosphere you uphold here.

They have the choice between silently accept your rule, or get abused
if they protest.

They have to join the secret community of tough people or leave.
Those are the rules you uphold.

Heavy Snip...Snip...Snip...

Roger -

It's truly a joy to read your posts. It is so refreshing to know that
literacy is alive and well in the Western world, in spite of overwhelming
evidence to the contrary on the internet in general, and usenet in
particular. Keep up the good fight.

You're right, of course. John Fields is an abusive, foul mouthed bully
who like all good bullies, picks on the weak and defenseless of which I can
guarantee, I am not one. He is probably off in some bar in Austin, sulking
since I read him the riot act yesterday. At least he has the good sense to
lay low for awhile until the heat dies down. Fortunately, I have a long
attention span and it will give me the greatest of pleasure to jump on his
case at every available opportunity...and I haven't even warmed up yet ;-)

Shoot, I'd better watch my step before I get accused of being a bully.
Can I recuse myself if I accuse myself? LOL


John Fields hardly needs me to defend him, but John DOES NOT pick on
the "weak and defenseless".

But, indeed, he does have a perverse need to pick on trolls of the
village-idiot persuasion.

If you want to "jump on his case", go ahead, be the next victim, make
John's day ;-)

Jim, you over-value John as a debater. He seems to have learned his
style of abuse in fourth grade, and failed to develop it since then.
In a user-group occasionally blessed by flames from the unsurpassed
Richard Steven Waltz, John Fields is a one-finger pianist playing
"Chopsticks", over and over again.

You may like his politics, but you can scarcely be impressed by his
abuse.

-------
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen

 

[Bill Sloman]

John Fields <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message news:<1u29pvshrj0cpafh5c6620ge6mepcvlgns@4ax.com>...

On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 18:20:39 -0700, "Baphomet"
fandaDEATH2SPAMMERS@catskill.net> wrote:


"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:gam8pv8hghekik4cfq61dcmoc8apt3c5r7@4ax.com...
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 14:58:10 -0700, "Baphomet"
fandaDEATH2SPAMMERS@catskill.net> wrote:


It's truly a joy to read your posts.

---
You _enjoy_ reading paranoid, sophomoric twaddle?

Only when it's good...but then again, how would you possibly know?

---
What, did you also lose your short term memory in VietNam?

It's not hard to figure out from your admission of enjoying reading
Johanson's masturbation fantasies.

You get your kicks from being beaten up by teenage boys?

Explains a lot.

---------
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen

 

[John Fields]

On 21 Oct 2003 03:29:15 -0700, bill.sloman@ieee.org (Bill Sloman) wrote:

You are welcome to join the "jump in and write rude things about John
Fields group" originally founded by Robert (of blessed memory).

I seldom miss an opportunity. Do try to keep it pithy though. Roger
Johansson's 309 lines was too long to be effective, and seems to
grossly over-rate John's cultural sensibility - he is not a
creationist, merely a dim creep who has been shaped by a creationist
environment.

---
Pithy, Bill, not banal.

--
John Fields

 

[John Fields]

On 21 Oct 2003 03:36:22 -0700, bill.sloman@ieee.org (Bill Sloman) wrote:

There you go again, assuming that everybody who thinks that you are an
arse-hole is sexually interested. The message you need to appreciate
is that we find you despicable, not desireable, and that we'd like
*you* to put a cork in it, rather than have you hanging it out in the
hope of more complimentary insertions.

---
What's happened to you Bill? I can remember when you could at least
stay on the subject for a _little_ while. Now, it seems you're just
trying a scattergun approach. Grasping at straws, perhaps? Or
Alzheimer's, Or don't you know?

--
John Fields