Apology on behalf of the United States of America

On Friday, October 25, 2019 at 5:46:51 PM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence..org wrote:

bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com wrote in news:fbb2abf6-4434-4d16-a149-
235bd80b89fd@googlegroups.com:

Trump has record high approval ratings from his supporters,

That has to be one of the most retarded statements you have ever made.

IOW, NO SHIT, DIP TRACY.

What 'SUPPORTER' would NOT support?

I did not think it was possible to be dumber than a standard
Trumpanzee retatard. You must be a Trumpanzee Shaman. A true sub-
standard of the sub-standard.

Bwuahahahahhahaa!

There's a difference between supporting his political agenda and approving of the job he's doing. That's why there's a separate poll for approval rating, they don't just assume being a supporter means the voter approves of him. Approval is a popularity rating, supporter is a political agenda rating.
Like I told you before, turn off the news. You lack the basic background knowledge to even modestly comprehend what you're hearing.

 

[Lasse Langwadt Christense]

lørdag den 26. oktober 2019 kl. 00.41.10 UTC+2 skrev bitrex:

Spending only as much as the top half of countries in the world on
defense, rather than more than every country in the world combined,
seems like a plausible option.

how much of that budget is really stuff other countries also do they just
don't put it don't he military budget to avoid being called socialist?

like creating jobs on regions that have nothing else to do, give someone
a free education

 

[John Larkin]

On Fri, 25 Oct 2019 18:41:04 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

On 10/25/19 3:03 PM, John Larkin wrote:
On Fri, 25 Oct 2019 13:40:56 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

On 10/25/19 10:31 AM, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Thu, 24 Oct 2019 14:51:59 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

On 10/24/19 2:04 PM, Whoey Louie wrote:
On Thursday, October 24, 2019 at 12:16:37 PM UTC-4, bitrex wrote:
On 10/24/19 9:27 AM, Whoey Louie wrote:
On Thursday, October 24, 2019 at 1:35:11 AM UTC-4, bitrex wrote:
On 10/23/19 6:00 PM, Whoey Louie wrote:
On Wednesday, October 23, 2019 at 11:44:45 AM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in
news:6c35fa8c-d27c-44c1-825a-9a5c38bbafc6@googlegroups.com:

On Tuesday, October 22, 2019 at 10:49:34 PM UTC-4,
DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in
news:c87009b3-25e9-4ec7-a3e3-4b866ab1e8ff@googlegroups.com:

The founders understood
what they were doing. It's worked perfectly fine here and will
continue to do so,

You are such a fucking retard. You have no clue what their
reasons
were. Many still had hooks in slavery.

I see. He who claims to be a Republican is now advancing the
party line of the nuttiest of the libs, that the US was founded on
slavery. Not that it matters, because slavery is irrelevant.








And the reason for it is no longer valid, if it ever was.

Since we see perfectly well that it was not only voters that
got
influenced by foreign players.

What's this newest conspiracy theory? Just like Trump?


And meanwhile, here you are, always bitching about Trump, but you
claim to be a Republican. It's the Republicans, including you,
who continue to support him and enable him. If ten or twenty
percent of the GOP left the party in disgust, like I did, this
insanity would come to an end.


I said nothing about the US being founded on slavery, you stupid,
illiterate fucktard!

You just dragged slavery into the electoral college. That sounds very
much what the lib loons are doing, trying to drag slavery into the
founding of America, claiming that America was founded on slavery.


It wasn't founded on slavery so much as that slavery at the time was
simply a fact of life.

I agree. But some of the screwy libs are claiming that the US was
founded on slavery. And many of them and more want reparations, as if
paying someone today for something from 150 years ago makes any sense.



The far left "movement" in America, such as it is, is pretty small
compared to some other places in the world.

That sure doesn't seem to be the case when you have twenty something
democrat lefties all running for president and only one more left-center guy,
Biden.

Nobody under 40 likes Biden. The guy is losing it already nearly as bad
as Trump is.


It has a loud voice and says
a lot of provocative things. That's fine with me that's part of the
concept of "freedom" and watching MAGA-types recoil in horror at
statements like "Hey, why don't we just buy all the homeless someplace
to live with taxpayer money?" can be amusing I'll admit. It probably
wouldn't cause the world to end. ohmahgawd they could all live somewhere!!!

Most of what passes for "leftism" here is just milquetoast centrism by
world standards asking stuff like "Hey wouldn't it be a great idea if
everyone had access to good-quality health care at low or no cost."

It's a lot more than that. Andy YinYang wants to give everyone of
legal age $1000 a month. All of the Democrats running favor free
healthcare for illegal aliens. All are in favor of sanctuary cities
and states and an open southern border. There are proposals for
free college education, canceling existing student debt, huge govt
spending with new programs, no plans for how to pay for it. It's
lib loony tunes time here. So loony, they may very well get Trump
re-elected.

Oh well we both think Yang is a loser candidate but for different
reasons, his $1000 UBI program is garbage not because UBI is IMO an
intrinsically bad idea necessarily, but because it comes along with a
10% VAT on all goods and services and at the expense of pretty much
every other government safety-net service for the poor.

$1000/month plus a 10% VAT on _all_ goods and services is a hand-out and
a gut punch simultaneously, to everyone but primarily again, the poor.
They definitely don't need a gut punch to go along with some new
program. $1000/month? Won't even cover housing and utility expenses in
many areas of the country. And as I understand it it's at the expense of
_all_ other social service programs like food stamps. what are they
going to eat, their utility bills?

And I'm perfectly ok with the cash not going to everyone. I don't need
an extra 1k a month give it to someone who does it would be a waste of
my time to even deal with the paperwork.

Having secure housing is a good idea, it's pretty hard to get a job and
work effectively when you're in a constant state of anxiety of whether
you're going to have anywhere to live next month. but Yang's ideas were
dreamed up in a corporate boardroom somewhere he seems to have no on the
ground experience with the destitute.

He's been super-wealthy so long he probably doesn't even know what
things cost anymore. Anyone candidate proposing new social programs of
any type aimed at the poor should at least be able to answer basic
questions about everyday life as a low-income person. What do things
cost. What kind of expenses do those people have. What does say a new
tire cost to replace when one gets a flat, so one can get to work and
not get fired. I doubt he'd be able to answer many of these simple
questions. His ideas are tits on a bull.



Guaranteed minimum income, guaranteed housing, universal medicaire,
and open borders is an interesting combination.




The first three are guaranteed to make lots of people happy except
billionaires and grumpy right-wingers who hate that people who aren't
them are even allowed to exist without being their personal slaves.

There are about 700 billionaires in the USA. Their wealth is mostly
stock shares. Their net economic influence is mostly the jealousy they
inspire.

What would any one person do with such a ludicrous amount of money?

Billionaires don't have "money." They mostly have stock shares.

Most

people couldn't even conceptualize how much a billion is relative to
figures encountered in more pedestrian life, much less be jealous of
that specific figure.

There is plenty of jealousy.

If I give $1000 a month to a few people, they will mostly be better
off. If I give the same to 300 million people, they will mostly be
worse off.

Money is just pieces of paper, like stock shares.

Imagine taxing their wealth to pay everyone a minimum income. That
would crash the stock market, and pay the guaranteed minimum for
roughly a year. Where does the money come from next?

Spending only as much as the top half of countries in the world on
defense, rather than more than every country in the world combined,
seems like a plausible option.

Agreed, we should not be spending trillions to keep up bases all
around the world. Let the europeans pay for as much defense as they
want.

--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc
picosecond timing precision measurement

jlarkin att highlandtechnology dott com
http://www.highlandtechnology.com

 

[John Larkin]

On Fri, 25 Oct 2019 21:39:30 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in
news:sf56re5gmr1ldd75qsuotiqnvcr5km747v@4ax.com:

On Thu, 24 Oct 2019 17:51:18 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in
news:uge3relh4farnddfudu2n521gt5p1qe6o8@4ax.com:

the damage that your 24/7 rage does to your life

I am in no rage, dipshit.

I'd love to rage on your face with a blackjack though.

Remember those?

That's exactly the point.

You made no point, dipshit. Yet another reason folks dislike you.
You tout total bullshit as fact.

You are so angry,

Invalid, incorrect observation. WAKE UP!


over stuff that you can
easily ignore, that you want to kill people.

Never ever said a damned thing about killing anyone.

"rage on your face with a blackjack" sounds dangerous to me.

Or did you mean to just shake it at me from a safe distance?

You can do useful, interesting, fun stuff, or you can be angry and
frustrated for the rest of your short life on earth.

I do useful, interesting 'things'. My 'short life' is quite
sufficient for me. Whatever God gives, I get. Including whatever
fucked up lesson I am supposed to learn by tolerating twerps like
you.

Jesus would be proud of you.

--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc
picosecond timing precision measurement

jlarkin att highlandtechnology dott com
http://www.highlandtechnology.com

 

[John Larkin]

On Fri, 25 Oct 2019 15:58:12 -0700 (PDT),
bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com wrote:

On Friday, October 25, 2019 at 5:46:51 PM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com wrote in news:fbb2abf6-4434-4d16-a149-
235bd80b89fd@googlegroups.com:

Trump has record high approval ratings from his supporters,

That has to be one of the most retarded statements you have ever made.

IOW, NO SHIT, DIP TRACY.

What 'SUPPORTER' would NOT support?

I did not think it was possible to be dumber than a standard
Trumpanzee retatard. You must be a Trumpanzee Shaman. A true sub-
standard of the sub-standard.

Bwuahahahahhahaa!

There's a difference between supporting his political agenda and approving of the job he's doing.

And they are sending him a *lot* of money.

--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc
picosecond timing precision measurement

jlarkin att highlandtechnology dott com
http://www.highlandtechnology.com

 

[bitrex]

On 10/25/19 6:41 PM, bitrex wrote:

The first three are guaranteed to make lots of people happy except
billionaires and grumpy right-wingers who hate that people who aren't
them are even allowed to exist without being their personal slaves.

There are about 700 billionaires in the USA. Their wealth is mostly
stock shares. Their net economic influence is mostly the jealousy they
inspire.

What would any one person do with such a ludicrous amount of money? Most
people couldn't even conceptualize how much a billion is relative to
figures encountered in more pedestrian life, much less be jealous of
that specific figure.

Only the Donald Trumps and the Trump-wannabees of the world desperately
want gold-plated Lamborghinis, 300 foot yachts and all the absurdly
tacky, gold-plated marble inlaid decor that comes along with all of it.

Most normal humans in the world who are not Trumps or
Trump-aspirationals view that "lifestyle" correctly as the fashion of
Emperor Nero-style madness and hubris that it is.

 

[Bill Sloman]

On Saturday, October 26, 2019 at 2:38:31 AM UTC+11, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

On Thu, 24 Oct 2019 17:51:18 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in
news:uge3relh4farnddfudu2n521gt5p1qe6o8@4ax.com:

the damage that your 24/7 rage does to your life

I am in no rage, dipshit.

I'd love to rage on your face with a blackjack though.

Remember those?

That's exactly the point. You are so angry, over stuff that you can
easily ignore, that you want to kill people.

Beating somebody's face with a black-jack isn't necessarily fatal.

You can do useful, interesting, fun stuff, or you can be angry and
frustrated for the rest of your short life on earth.

The problem here is that John Larkin wants to tell us what constitutes interesting fun stuff, and seems to think that it is perfectly okay to ignore serious failures in the way society is running - letting Donald Trump get elected President, or letting atmospheric CO2 levels hit 415 ppm and leaving them free to get higher.

He sees anybody with enough sense to worry about the bigger picture as allowing themselves to get agitated about stuff that he thinks that they can't influence.

It may be good for your short term mental health to imagine that this is the best of all possible worlds, but as Shaw said "the reasonable man adapts himself to the world as it is, while it's the unreasonable man who tries to change, which means that all progress depends on the unreasonable man".

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[bitrex]

On 10/25/19 7:41 PM, Bill Sloman wrote:

On Saturday, October 26, 2019 at 1:32:00 AM UTC+11, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Thu, 24 Oct 2019 14:51:59 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

On 10/24/19 2:04 PM, Whoey Louie wrote:
On Thursday, October 24, 2019 at 12:16:37 PM UTC-4, bitrex wrote:
On 10/24/19 9:27 AM, Whoey Louie wrote:
On Thursday, October 24, 2019 at 1:35:11 AM UTC-4, bitrex wrote:
On 10/23/19 6:00 PM, Whoey Louie wrote:
On Wednesday, October 23, 2019 at 11:44:45 AM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in
news:6c35fa8c-d27c-44c1-825a-9a5c38bbafc6@googlegroups.com:

On Tuesday, October 22, 2019 at 10:49:34 PM UTC-4,
DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in
news:c87009b3-25e9-4ec7-a3e3-4b866ab1e8ff@googlegroups.com:

snip

Guaranteed minimum income, guaranteed housing, universal medicaire,
and open borders is an interesting combination.

It would be, if anybody were silly enough to propose it.

The mindless right sees any attempt to treat refugees humanely (and give genuine refugees the treatment that the UN recommends) as being soft on illegal immigrants, and thinks that anything less aggressive than their feral brutality consitutes offering open borders.

But nobody is ever going to get John Larkin to think about the implications of the ideas that he parrots.

The United States doesn't really have an effective "left" per se that
proposes things as legitimately "leftist" as JL writes.

The United States has a group of hardcore authoritarian nationalists who
call themselves Conservatives. Most of them wouldn't actually kill
anyone they don't like but would prefer it if they just died or went
away somehow.

and then a group of rabid fascists and white supremacists who would make
excellent Waffen SS and concentration camp guards and would happily go
around executing thousands of civilians like the Marines in Vietnam if
it were legal to do so.

That makes up the bulk of the right wing here.

Everyone else mostly has radical ideas like "maybe we can just use law
enforcement to police the border like we always have" and "wouldn't it
be a good idea if everyone could have affordable healthcare"

 

[Bill Sloman]

On Saturday, October 26, 2019 at 4:53:36 AM UTC+11, bloggs.fre...@gmail.com wrote:

On Thursday, October 24, 2019 at 10:31:45 PM UTC-4, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Friday, October 25, 2019 at 1:52:15 AM UTC+11, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Thu, 24 Oct 2019 11:34:38 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

jurb6006@gmail.com wrote in
news:096cf7e8-135c-4a7e-8ac5-a4475d1d9133@googlegroups.com:

<snip>

With any luck the crook will be impeached for his crimes and won't even get to stand, but that would require the Republican Party to recognise that their president is an electoral liability. If they'd had that much sense they wouldn't have nominated him in the first place, or allowed the Tea Party fraction to put up such dismal alternatives.

Trump has record high approval ratings from his supporters, and he will be reelected in 2020.

There aren't enough of them to guarantee this. 40.6% isn't a particularly high approval rating and quitre a few of them are too dumb to realise that ehy need to vote for him. John Larkin has never voted.

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/trump-approval-ratings/

> The Dems with their pathetically weak line-up of freaks for candidates know this, and that's why they're going the impeachment route. They have nothing and will get nowhere.

The Dems didn't want to go for impeachment - Trump's phone call to the president of Ukraine was so blatantly wrong that they didn't have any choice.

Fred Bloggs does have a problem with women, which is why he sees Elizabeth Warren as a pathetically weak freak candidate. Less prejudiced observers note that she has clear ideas about ways in which US society could be improved, and has already been involved in putting some of them into practice.

The contrast with Trump couldn't be starker.

Even Bernie Sanders is advocating policies that work fine in Northern Europe. Republicans think that pointing out that many of them are socialist (which they think means communist) guarantees that he won't be elected, but Donald Trump has now spent three years damaging the rightwing brand identity.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[bitrex]

On 10/25/19 8:03 PM, bitrex wrote:

The mindless right sees any attempt to treat refugees humanely (and
give genuine refugees the treatment that the UN recommends) as being
soft on illegal immigrants, and thinks that anything less aggressive
than their feral brutality consitutes offering open borders.

But nobody is ever going to get John Larkin to think about the
implications of the ideas that he parrots.


The United States doesn't really have an effective "left" per se that
proposes things as legitimately "leftist" as JL writes.

The United States has a group of hardcore authoritarian nationalists who
call themselves Conservatives. Most of them wouldn't actually kill
anyone they don't like but would prefer it if they just died or went
away somehow.

and then a group of rabid fascists and white supremacists who would make
excellent Waffen SS and concentration camp guards and would happily go
around executing thousands of civilians like the Marines in Vietnam if
it were legal to do so.

That makes up the bulk of the right wing here.

Both of them tend to have the same idea of what the "political process"
is which is "I do what I want, and you do as I say, or I'll fucking kill
you."

 

John Larkin <jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote in
news:vk07re5crl4kjdt6d4se3s1vf8th0a49jq@4ax.com:

Maybe impeached in the House. Certainly not convicted in the
Senate.
Impeachment will probably help him, as it did Clinton.

Oh no. It will be their duty. He will get shitcanned.

After all, there will be a point when blatant disregard for facts
becomes a criminal act.

Their childish barging into a scif yesterday was absolutely a
criminal act and they know it.

This ain't a break time blowjob, so the Clinton Impeachment and any
point you try to make is pretty much you being as stupid as the
dishonorable twerps that stormed the meeting.

 

John Larkin <jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote in
news:fe07ret1cso4h6eil551tq8fsh81596gfu@4ax.com:

On Fri, 25 Oct 2019 21:39:30 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in
news:sf56re5gmr1ldd75qsuotiqnvcr5km747v@4ax.com:

On Thu, 24 Oct 2019 17:51:18 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in
news:uge3relh4farnddfudu2n521gt5p1qe6o8@4ax.com:

the damage that your 24/7 rage does to your life

I am in no rage, dipshit.

I'd love to rage on your face with a blackjack though.

Remember those?

That's exactly the point.

You made no point, dipshit. Yet another reason folks dislike
you.
You tout total bullshit as fact.

You are so angry,

Invalid, incorrect observation. WAKE UP!


over stuff that you can
easily ignore, that you want to kill people.

Never ever said a damned thing about killing anyone.

"rage on your face with a blackjack" sounds dangerous to me.

Or did you mean to just shake it at me from a safe distance?

No. I meant 'bludgeon you so badly that it takes you to the very
edge of death'. And then pour salt on your wounds.

You can do useful, interesting, fun stuff, or you can be angry
and frustrated for the rest of your short life on earth.

I do useful, interesting 'things'. My 'short life' is quite
sufficient for me. Whatever God gives, I get. Including whatever
fucked up lesson I am supposed to learn by tolerating twerps like
you.

Jesus would be proud of you.

For trouncing on a punk like you?

 

[Bill Sloman]

On Saturday, October 26, 2019 at 3:12:30 AM UTC+11, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

On Fri, 25 Oct 2019 08:57:55 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com
wrote:

On Thursday, October 24, 2019 at 7:52:15 AM UTC-7, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Thu, 24 Oct 2019 11:34:38 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

2. Accept your loss.

What loss?

The loss is the damage that your 24/7 rage does to your life...

There's a clear class distinction present here: the lower class thinks of
the future as a month; the middle class thinks of the future as a few years.
An upper class considers generations.

That doesn't explain the many rich people who are alcoholics and
druggies, and who squander the family fortunes.

Being rich doesn't make you upper class. You can be born of rich parents and fail to exploit the opportunities this offers you.

> People of all "classes" have about the same passions.

But there are classier and less classy ways of coping with them.

Righteous anger can fuel an upper-class plan that lasts into the century,
or a middle-class plan that prepares for the next election. Only the
lower-class thinking makes an electoral defeat into cause for acceptance.

"Upper class" people don't have a monopoly on common sense.

They do tend to have access to better education. Getting stuck with Tulane is what happens to lower class people, and not moving on to a better institution is one way of staying lower class.

Common sense is what lets you discriminate between the possibilities that you know about. Getting a decent education opens your mind to a wider range of possibilities - like politicians who are better-behaved than Donald Trump.

Upper class people typically have access to more books than lower class people - there's a risk that they can get addicted to books designed to flatter their self-image (and "The Bell Curve" comes to mind) but more books often helps.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

On Sat, 26 Oct 2019 00:07:12 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

John Larkin <jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote in
news:fe07ret1cso4h6eil551tq8fsh81596gfu@4ax.com:

On Fri, 25 Oct 2019 21:39:30 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in
news:sf56re5gmr1ldd75qsuotiqnvcr5km747v@4ax.com:

On Thu, 24 Oct 2019 17:51:18 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in
news:uge3relh4farnddfudu2n521gt5p1qe6o8@4ax.com:

the damage that your 24/7 rage does to your life

I am in no rage, dipshit.

I'd love to rage on your face with a blackjack though.

Remember those?

That's exactly the point.

You made no point, dipshit. Yet another reason folks dislike
you.
You tout total bullshit as fact.

You are so angry,

Invalid, incorrect observation. WAKE UP!


over stuff that you can
easily ignore, that you want to kill people.

Never ever said a damned thing about killing anyone.

"rage on your face with a blackjack" sounds dangerous to me.

Or did you mean to just shake it at me from a safe distance?

No. I meant 'bludgeon you so badly that it takes you to the very
edge of death'. And then pour salt on your wounds.

Sick and idle fantasies. The person whose life you are actually
ruining is yourself.



--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc

lunatic fringe electronics

 

[Bill Sloman]

On Saturday, October 26, 2019 at 1:08:48 PM UTC+11, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

On Sat, 26 Oct 2019 00:07:12 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

John Larkin <jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote in
news:fe07ret1cso4h6eil551tq8fsh81596gfu@4ax.com:

On Fri, 25 Oct 2019 21:39:30 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in
news:sf56re5gmr1ldd75qsuotiqnvcr5km747v@4ax.com:

On Thu, 24 Oct 2019 17:51:18 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in
news:uge3relh4farnddfudu2n521gt5p1qe6o8@4ax.com:

<snip>

Never ever said a damned thing about killing anyone.

"rage on your face with a blackjack" sounds dangerous to me.

Or did you mean to just shake it at me from a safe distance?

No. I meant 'bludgeon you so badly that it takes you to the very
edge of death'. And then pour salt on your wounds.

Sick and idle fantasies. The person whose life you are actually
ruining is yourself.

John Larkin's sick and idle fantasy is that anthropogenic global warming isn't happening.

He isn't the only dangerous lunatic to espouse this idea - the people who are making serious money out of it spend some of that money to encourage gullible twits like him to think that way too.

Since the human population crash that they are risking won't happen in this generation, they are not ruining their own lives, but they are putting an enormous number of lives at risk.

It's irresponsible idiocy, but too long term to generate the amount of execration it deserves. I try to fill the execration gap, but I'm no Phil Allison.

--
Bill Sloman, sydney

 

Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com> wrote in news:qp18qf$i56$1@dont-
email.me:

On Fri, 25 Oct 2019 16:16:24 -0700, John Larkin wrote:

Jesus would be proud of you.

You do seem to attract all the nut-cases, John! :-D

Did he send you a picture of squirrels around his house? You
immature dingledorf?

Imagine, a fucktard 'curd' like you spouting off about 'nut-cases'.

With exclamation points, no less.

You're a fucking joke.

 

[Cursitor Doom]

On Fri, 25 Oct 2019 16:16:24 -0700, John Larkin wrote:

> Jesus would be proud of you.

You do seem to attract all the nut-cases, John! :-D



--
This message may be freely reproduced without limit or charge only via
the Usenet protocol. Reproduction in whole or part through other
protocols, whether for profit or not, is conditional upon a charge of
GBP10.00 per reproduction. Publication in this manner via non-Usenet
protocols constitutes acceptance of this condition.

 

Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com> wrote in news:qp1cgv$6jf$1@dont-
email.me:

On Fri, 25 Oct 2019 16:20:18 -0700, John Larkin wrote:

Pence can pardon him. It has been done, you know.

Tricky Dickie '74?

Pence could end up under indictment in this case as well.
Before he gets a chance to do any such thing.

 

[Cursitor Doom]

On Fri, 25 Oct 2019 16:20:18 -0700, John Larkin wrote:

> Pence can pardon him. It has been done, you know.

Tricky Dickie '74?



--
This message may be freely reproduced without limit or charge only via
the Usenet protocol. Reproduction in whole or part through other
protocols, whether for profit or not, is conditional upon a charge of
GBP10.00 per reproduction. Publication in this manner via non-Usenet
protocols constitutes acceptance of this condition.