T
Thomas
Guest
On Jul 7, 8:59 am, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
ROFLMAO
S
Scout
Guest
keithr wrote:
like to the appropriate newgroup(s) then no one will have any problems
keeping it out of an electronics newsgroup. However, if he brings up the
subject of guns there.....well he picked the battleground. Maybe you
should take up his choice of battleground with Trevor and get on his
case when he starts getting off topic.....or does that make too much sense?
Sure, and once you get Trevor to limit his comments about guns and such
like to the appropriate newgroup(s) then no one will have any problems
keeping it out of an electronics newsgroup. However, if he brings up the
subject of guns there.....well he picked the battleground. Maybe you
should take up his choice of battleground with Trevor and get on his
case when he starts getting off topic.....or does that make too much sense?
M
Mr.T
Guest
<editor@netpath.net> wrote in message
news:e05647b6-8ebf-46fb-b84b-349dbb07db49@a36g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
MrT.
news:e05647b6-8ebf-46fb-b84b-349dbb07db49@a36g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
You mean like that popular "Leftist" media network owned by Rupert Murdoch?
MrT.
J
Jeßus
Guest
In article <4%Z3m.10469$8P7.5340@newsfe21.iad>, altzone@gmail.com
said...
'anti-gun zealot' in disguise. He's certainly having the desired effect,
if that's his real motive.
said...
None. I'm beginning to suspect that 'John-Melb' is in fact another
'anti-gun zealot' in disguise. He's certainly having the desired effect,
if that's his real motive.
T
Thomas
Guest
On Jul 7, 11:44 am, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
Yep, but he isn't, he's spreading his assertions on aus.electronics.
We're arguing with Trevor on aus.electronic BECAUSE he is posting his
anti-gun garbage on aus.electronics.
Have you said the same thing to Trevor about his comments regarding
American gun dealers, DGU's and "psychopaths in the
talk.politics.guns
group ", if not, why not?
Yep, but he isn't, he's spreading his assertions on aus.electronics.
We're arguing with Trevor on aus.electronic BECAUSE he is posting his
anti-gun garbage on aus.electronics.
Have you said the same thing to Trevor about his comments regarding
American gun dealers, DGU's and "psychopaths in the
talk.politics.guns
group ", if not, why not?
T
Thomas
Guest
On Jul 7, 2:08 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
Trevor posts his anti-gun crap on aus.electronics, and you support his
right to post it there.
We respond and get whinged at.
Whilst Trevor chooses to use aus.electronics as a means to spread his
anti-gun rethoric, I'll be around. Live with it or take it up with
Trevor.
in an attempt to vilify those who have done him no wrong? As Wilson
has previously done on both rec.audio.opinion and aus.hi-fi as well as
aus.electronics? Someone who repeatadly treats those who disagree with
him with contempt? Someone who point blank refuse to provide cites for
his claims like the time he provided a "cite" of "www.google.com" or
deliberately provides erroneous cites, like the time Wilson claimed
the FBI-UCR for 1976-86 were available on the FBI website? The answer
to your question is "Very likely".
Yep, and you do what you do, and I do what I do.
Trevor posts his anti-gun crap on aus.electronics, and you support his
right to post it there.
We respond and get whinged at.
Whilst Trevor chooses to use aus.electronics as a means to spread his
anti-gun rethoric, I'll be around. Live with it or take it up with
Trevor.
Someone with a history of posting untrue garbage on unrelated groups
in an attempt to vilify those who have done him no wrong? As Wilson
has previously done on both rec.audio.opinion and aus.hi-fi as well as
aus.electronics? Someone who repeatadly treats those who disagree with
him with contempt? Someone who point blank refuse to provide cites for
his claims like the time he provided a "cite" of "www.google.com" or
deliberately provides erroneous cites, like the time Wilson claimed
the FBI-UCR for 1976-86 were available on the FBI website? The answer
to your question is "Very likely".
T
Thomas
Guest
On Jul 7, 3:23 pm, Thomas <recalcitrant_redn...@hotmail.com> wrote:
S
Scout
Guest
keithr wrote:
issues with what is or isn't posted there, and as such I thought you
might like to address it at the source. Otherwise, don't bitch when
people responds to his comments on other subjects.
stupid comments about Australian electronics design, then I would think
that confronting and addressing his nonsense would be called
for....don't you?
Certainly not, it's not my primary newsgroup. You, however, seem to have
issues with what is or isn't posted there, and as such I thought you
might like to address it at the source. Otherwise, don't bitch when
people responds to his comments on other subjects.
I would unless they were talking to some poster here who was making
stupid comments about Australian electronics design, then I would think
that confronting and addressing his nonsense would be called
for....don't you?
It's not a matter of POV but facts.
S
Scout
Guest
keithr wrote:
If they don't care....then you can stop whining about it.
Otherwise, I suggest you take it up with Trevor, he picked the battleground
<snip>
If they don't care....then you can stop whining about it.
Otherwise, I suggest you take it up with Trevor, he picked the battleground
J
John - Melb
Guest
On Jul 7, 3:08 pm, Thomas <recalcitrant_redn...@hotmail.com> wrote:
because they agree with him? As you said, active combatants.
Interesting question Tom, I guess they aren't having a dig at Trevor
because they agree with him? As you said, active combatants.
J
John - Melb
Guest
On Jul 7, 2:08 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
Chinese sneakers, we can put up with the likes of you.
Almost sounds like a threat, I'm sure if we can put up with adds for
Chinese sneakers, we can put up with the likes of you.
R
regn.pickford
Guest
"John - Melb" <mcnamara_john@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:9d1a8d56-4488-47a6-aeb8-521d4d984ead@12g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 6, 6:30 am, "regn.pickford" <r...@mysoul.cop.au> wrote:
Then it mustn't have come up about **Trevor's belief that
obtaining or possessing inanimate objects like Electronic smoke
alarms, Electronic fire control systems or fire extinguishers means you
are a pyromaniac in self denial and want to start fires.
You don't have an electronic smoke alarm unless you intend to use it.
news:9d1a8d56-4488-47a6-aeb8-521d4d984ead@12g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 6, 6:30 am, "regn.pickford" <r...@mysoul.cop.au> wrote:
Then it mustn't have come up about **Trevor's belief that
obtaining or possessing inanimate objects like Electronic smoke
alarms, Electronic fire control systems or fire extinguishers means you
are a pyromaniac in self denial and want to start fires.
You don't have an electronic smoke alarm unless you intend to use it.
K
keithr
Guest
Scout wrote:
started it mister, it isn't our fault"
What a pathetic whining little bunch of 9 year olds you are - "Hekeithr wrote:
Thomas wrote:
On Jul 7, 2:08 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
Trevor does what Trevor does and that is nothing to do with the rest of
the posters on the NG. I don't see that you have any argument whatever
he chooses to post there. If the posters of aus.electronics were to
start flooding this NG with postings about electronic design, then you
would have some grievance but the majority of the posters there are far
too considerate to do that.
It is very much something to do with other aus.electronic posters,
when Wilson posts his anti-gun garbage, like his normal people"
comments of his lies about US gun dealers, and you people support his
right to make those comments, but then sook like litle girls when an
alternative view is posted.
It is absolutely nothing to do with other aus.electronic posters and
none of them care in the least about your rants.
snip
If they don't care....then you can stop whining about it.
Otherwise, I suggest you take it up with Trevor, he picked the battleground
started it mister, it isn't our fault"
S
Scout
Guest
keithr wrote:
Well, I didn't want to be the one to say that about you, but I'm happy
to see you can admit it.
Scout wrote:
keithr wrote:
Thomas wrote:
On Jul 7, 2:08 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
Trevor does what Trevor does and that is nothing to do with the
rest of
the posters on the NG. I don't see that you have any argument whatever
he chooses to post there. If the posters of aus.electronics were to
start flooding this NG with postings about electronic design, then you
would have some grievance but the majority of the posters there are
far
too considerate to do that.
It is very much something to do with other aus.electronic posters,
when Wilson posts his anti-gun garbage, like his normal people"
comments of his lies about US gun dealers, and you people support his
right to make those comments, but then sook like litle girls when an
alternative view is posted.
It is absolutely nothing to do with other aus.electronic posters and
none of them care in the least about your rants.
snip
If they don't care....then you can stop whining about it.
Otherwise, I suggest you take it up with Trevor, he picked the
battleground
What a pathetic whining little bunch of 9 year olds you are - "He
started it mister, it isn't our fault"
Well, I didn't want to be the one to say that about you, but I'm happy
to see you can admit it.
T
Thomas
Guest
On Jul 7, 11:23 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
as a forum to launch an attack on guns and gun owners, as he had
previously done on both rec.audio.opinion and aus.hi-fi. The material
posted in response to this demonstrates that Wilson often tells
porkies about firearms related matters and the anti-gun lobby in
general often it wrong. If you're prepared to tell Wilson to keep his
his anti-gun rethoric off aus.electronics, I'm prepared to walk away.
If Wilson continues to use aus.electronics as a vehicle to launch his
anti-gun tirades, all bets are off.
about guns and gun owners on aus.electronics, but the alternaie view
is not welcome. I don't think I've cost The Shooter's Party any votes
at all, you're minds were made up well before Wilson posted his
"normal people" rant. Responding to anti-gun zealots is never futile,
and as for posting in a forum where the anti view is welcomed but the
pro view is not, again, highlighting prejudice is always worthwhile.
Alright, I'll do a deal with you. Wanker Wilson used aus.electronics
as a forum to launch an attack on guns and gun owners, as he had
previously done on both rec.audio.opinion and aus.hi-fi. The material
posted in response to this demonstrates that Wilson often tells
porkies about firearms related matters and the anti-gun lobby in
general often it wrong. If you're prepared to tell Wilson to keep his
his anti-gun rethoric off aus.electronics, I'm prepared to walk away.
If Wilson continues to use aus.electronics as a vehicle to launch his
anti-gun tirades, all bets are off.
So, it's OK for an anti-gun zealot like Wilson to makes his remarks
about guns and gun owners on aus.electronics, but the alternaie view
is not welcome. I don't think I've cost The Shooter's Party any votes
at all, you're minds were made up well before Wilson posted his
"normal people" rant. Responding to anti-gun zealots is never futile,
and as for posting in a forum where the anti view is welcomed but the
pro view is not, again, highlighting prejudice is always worthwhile.
B
Bob Larter
Guest
Thomas wrote:
aus.electronics poster? What did we do to deserve being bombarded with
massively off-topic xposts?
--
W
. | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because
\|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------
Assuming that it's true, how is that the fault of every other
aus.electronics poster? What did we do to deserve being bombarded with
massively off-topic xposts?
--
W
. | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because
\|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------
B
Bob Larter
Guest
John - Melb wrote:
--
W
. | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because
\|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------
Oh please. He's just making an analogy.
--
W
. | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because
\|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------
B
Bob Larter
Guest
Scout wrote:
they don't say it here, who gives a stuff?
In summary: <http://xkcd.com/386/>
--
W
. | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because
\|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------
No. People talk complete rubbish about electronics all over Usenet. If
they don't say it here, who gives a stuff?
In summary: <http://xkcd.com/386/>
--
W
. | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because
\|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------
B
Bob Larter
Guest
Thomas wrote:
something relating to electronics, would you want us to drown the gun
groups in tirades against that person? At the very least, I doubt that
you'd be interested in the resulting thread.
minds.
aus.electronics - I skipped over the Taser thread because I'm profoundly
uninterested in the pro/anti gun debate. Yes, I have my opinions on the
topic, but they're not on the pro or anti side, & they're totally
off-topic for aus.electronics. In the unlikely event that I develop an
interest in either side of the debate, I'll sub to one of the relevent
newsgroups.
either couldn't care less about the issue, or simply aren't interested
in arguing about it.
In summary; the guy xposting stuff between here & the gun groups is
being a dickhead, & you won't score any points with anyone by being just
as big a dickhead.
--
W
. | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because
\|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------
Hell no. If someone in one of the gun groups decided to mouth off about
something relating to electronics, would you want us to drown the gun
groups in tirades against that person? At the very least, I doubt that
you'd be interested in the resulting thread.
You clearly have a low opinions of peoples' ability to make up their own
minds.
That's a big assumption. Speaking for myself - & probably many others in
aus.electronics - I skipped over the Taser thread because I'm profoundly
uninterested in the pro/anti gun debate. Yes, I have my opinions on the
topic, but they're not on the pro or anti side, & they're totally
off-topic for aus.electronics. In the unlikely event that I develop an
interest in either side of the debate, I'll sub to one of the relevent
newsgroups.
You're missing the point, which is that, IMHO, most of the posters here
either couldn't care less about the issue, or simply aren't interested
in arguing about it.
In summary; the guy xposting stuff between here & the gun groups is
being a dickhead, & you won't score any points with anyone by being just
as big a dickhead.
--
W
. | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because
\|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------
K
keithr
Guest
Scout wrote:
that reply makes no sense at all, although it does sound rather childish.keithr wrote:
Scout wrote:
keithr wrote:
Thomas wrote:
On Jul 7, 2:08 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
Trevor does what Trevor does and that is nothing to do with the
rest of
the posters on the NG. I don't see that you have any argument
whatever
he chooses to post there. If the posters of aus.electronics were to
start flooding this NG with postings about electronic design, then
you
would have some grievance but the majority of the posters there
are far
too considerate to do that.
It is very much something to do with other aus.electronic posters,
when Wilson posts his anti-gun garbage, like his normal people"
comments of his lies about US gun dealers, and you people support his
right to make those comments, but then sook like litle girls when an
alternative view is posted.
It is absolutely nothing to do with other aus.electronic posters
and none of them care in the least about your rants.
snip
If they don't care....then you can stop whining about it.
Otherwise, I suggest you take it up with Trevor, he picked the
battleground
What a pathetic whining little bunch of 9 year olds you are - "He
started it mister, it isn't our fault"
Well, I didn't want to be the one to say that about you, but I'm happy
to see you can admit it.