Why do circuit breakers go up for on and down for off?...

On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 20:27:02 +0000, NY <me@privacy.net> wrote:

On 14/02/2023 18:54, Rod Speed wrote:
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 05:30:17 +1100, Carlos E. R.
robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:

On 2023-02-14 19:18, Rod Speed wrote:
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 01:17:43 +1100, Ian Jackson
ianREMOVETHISjackson@g3ohx.co.uk> wrote:
In message <op.10bquhfubyq249@pvr2.lan>, Rod Speed
rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> writes
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 08:00:14 +1100, NY <me@privacy.invalid> wrote:




Yes, I\'m not saying that Japanese grass and veg is blue, just they
(apparently) used the same word to describe both green and blue.

Sounds unlikely given that they must have noticed that the sky and
grass  arent the same color

Languages are strange things,
 Specially  the ones like english which have hijacked
useful words from any language of a country they
have fucked over or had anything to do with.

and some don\'t have words for the bleedin\' obvious.
 Can\'t think of any examples of that.

For example, Latin and in Gaelic seem to have difficulty with the
simple concept of \'Yes\' and \'No\'.
 Presumably because they prefer more subtle variations of those words.
 Same with languages which dont have a simple \'you\' and
have different words used for those you know well and
those you don\'t.

English uses \"you\" for both plural and singular.

Some use the word yous for the plural. I used to say \'you too\'
when asking the parents what they planned to do when together
and for some reason my stupid step mother didnt like that phrase.

\"Thou\" is not used.

I didn\'t mean that. I meant when two different words are
used in some languages like german for people who are
familiar to the speaker or not.

Yes, that is/was the distinction between thou (familiar) and you
(formal) - the exact same distinction as between tu/vous and du/Sie,
although vous and Sie can both mean you (plural) as well as you
(formal). English probably could do with a plural form of you; the
distinction between familiar and formal is less important.


you guys or y\'all.
 
In alt.home.repair, on Mon, 13 Feb 2023 16:30:21 GMT,
scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) wrote:

\"Rod Speed\" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> writes:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 21:21:29 +1100, Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid
wrote:


Please do not remove group names in your reply.

One of the commonly used servers gives you no choice on that.

And common etiquette requires removing unwanted/uneeded or unnecessary
cross posting.

Especially for ridiculous threads like this one.

I learned when I got to usenet that it was a violation of netiquette to
remove newsgroups from a distribution list.

While the immediate poster P may want his reply to go only to some
groups, those who follow after him F may want posters earlier than P to
see F\'s posts, and may not notice that ngs have been removed.
 
On 2023-02-18 22:55, Rod Speed wrote:
On Sun, 19 Feb 2023 07:25:43 +1100, Carlos E.R.
robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:

On 2023-02-18 02:47, Rod Speed wrote:
On Sat, 18 Feb 2023 06:19:29 +1100, Carlos E. R.
robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:

On 2023-02-17 20:12, Rod Speed wrote:
On Sat, 18 Feb 2023 03:05:55 +1100, Carlos E. R.
robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:

On 2023-02-17 04:52, Rod Speed wrote:
On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 12:45:30 +1100, Carlos E.R.
robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
On 2023-02-16 16:26, Scott Lurndal wrote:
micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> writes:
In alt.home.repair, on Thu, 16 Feb 2023 13:30:34 +0100,
\"Carlos E.R.\" <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
On 2023-02-16 05:45, micky wrote:
In alt.home.repair, on Wed, 15 Feb 2023 23:32:44 +0100,
\"Carlos E.R.\" <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:


I think all houses have circuit breakers, but that doesn\'t
mean they
have a fully compliant installation.

I don\'t think they\'ve ever ordered that here.  Althought some
people
remodel and upgrade on their own.  A friend bought a 100-year old
farmhouse about 10 years ago and it still had knob and tube
wiring.  I
think it was connected and in use.
 A lot of insurance companies will exclude electric-caused issues
from the policy if the home has knob and tube here in the states.

I had to look it up.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knob-and-tube_wiring

I\'ve never seen it here. Maybe, just maybe, something related
from before I was born. But we don\'t build houses with wood,
like in the photos. All brick, mortar, stone, concrete.
 Bullshit.
https://www.google.com/search?q=wooden+houses+spain&tbm=isch

Did you check the percent? :)
 You said DON\'T and ALL.

Less than a 0.01% error, probably.
 Don\'t buy that with the prefabs and we can see that your number is a
lie
using google street view.

In cities?

Yep.

In my city I don\'t remember seeing a single wood house.

Which city so I can street view it ?

Cartagena.

On some beaches, yes. For political reasons:

It is very difficult to get a building permit in some places, so
people plant a prefab instead.

So you were wrong.

Nope.

--
Cheers, Carlos.
 
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 10:16:13 +1100, \"Rod Speed\"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:

On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 07:27:02 +1100, NY <me@privacy.net> wrote:

On 14/02/2023 18:54, Rod Speed wrote:
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 05:30:17 +1100, Carlos E. R.
robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:

On 2023-02-14 19:18, Rod Speed wrote:
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 01:17:43 +1100, Ian Jackson
ianREMOVETHISjackson@g3ohx.co.uk> wrote:
In message <op.10bquhfubyq249@pvr2.lan>, Rod Speed
rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> writes
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 08:00:14 +1100, NY <me@privacy.invalid> wrote:




Yes, I\'m not saying that Japanese grass and veg is blue, just they
(apparently) used the same word to describe both green and blue.

Sounds unlikely given that they must have noticed that the sky and
grass arent the same color

Languages are strange things,
Specially the ones like english which have hijacked
useful words from any language of a country they
have fucked over or had anything to do with.

and some don\'t have words for the bleedin\' obvious.
Can\'t think of any examples of that.

For example, Latin and in Gaelic seem to have difficulty with the
simple concept of \'Yes\' and \'No\'.
Presumably because they prefer more subtle variations of those words.
Same with languages which dont have a simple \'you\' and
have different words used for those you know well and
those you don\'t.

English uses \"you\" for both plural and singular.
Some use the word yous for the plural. I used to say \'you too\'
when asking the parents what they planned to do when together
and for some reason my stupid step mother didnt like that phrase.

\"Thou\" is not used.
I didn\'t mean that. I meant when two different words are
used in some languages like german for people who are
familiar to the speaker or not.

Yes, that is/was the distinction between thou (familiar) and you
(formal) - the exact same distinction as between tu/vous and du/Sie,
although vous and Sie can both mean you (plural) as well as you (formal).

English probably could do with a plural form of you;

It already has a couple of informal ones, yous and you-all for yanks.

I used to say \'you two\' when asking the parents say where they would
be at a certain time etc, but my step mother didn\'t like that style. She
was a rather silly woman tho, hated the use of the word holidays for
university students, insisted on vacation for some reason.

the distinction between familiar and formal is less important.

We do have one here, \'darl\', even when referring to a man.

dawlin and honey in the south, by salesgirls for example. That\'s sort
of nice.
 
On 19/02/2023 12:37, Max Demian wrote:
On 18/02/2023 20:09, SteveW wrote:
On 18/02/2023 15:05, Max Demian wrote:
On 18/02/2023 13:14, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

\"The Electricity (Supply) Act 1919 merged the 600-odd local
generating companies into area boards, who in turn were centralised
into the Central Electricity Board by the Electricity Supply Act
1925. That is when the voltage was standardised at 240V, and the
National Grid created.

And then the EU stole ten of our good, English volts!

Have we got them back yet?

No they didn\'t. The reference simply changed to 230V, so that 220V and
240V countries could use the same, single design of 230V equipment,
designed with a wide enough tolerance to cope with the lowest
permitted voltage on 220V systems and the highest permitted voltage on
240V systems. The voltage supplied did not change.

Pointless as modern power supplies can easily accommodate wide ranges of
voltage. They should have left it up to manufacturers to decide what
range of voltage to cope with, depending on where they wanted to sell
the goods. 100-250V (50/60Hz) for Europe and US, 200-250V for UK and
Europe, 220-250V for UK only. Some goods are/were only suitable for the
UK due to language and TV system.

Euroharmonising for the sake of it.
+1. A more useless bit of virtue signalling \'harmonisation\' the EU has
yet to dream up.

If manufacturers want to cope with different voltages and frequencies
they can. Or not, if they dont.

I am fairly sure that one of my guitar amplifiers has an SMPSU that can
cope from 110V AC or DC to 240VAC or DC.


--
“I know that most men, including those at ease with problems of the
greatest complexity, can seldom accept even the simplest and most
obvious truth if it be such as would oblige them to admit the falsity of
conclusions which they have delighted in explaining to colleagues, which
they have proudly taught to others, and which they have woven, thread by
thread, into the fabric of their lives.”

― Leo Tolstoy
 
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 22:48:01 +0000, SteveW wrote:

> I don\'t know any Spanish. I only did French and Latin at school.

Ah, French... Amazon Prime has a series \'Three Pines\' that is set in
Quebec. I couldn\'t figure out one of the detective\'s names until I saw it
written Jean-Guy. I would have picked up on Jean-Paul or Jean-Marie but
Jonkey left me puzzled.
 
On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 01:28:53 -0000, Commander Kinsey wrote:

> My favourite sports car is a Triumph TR7.

Figures.

https://www.hotcars.com/triumph-tr7-best-avoided-by-gearheads/

The TR3 had a certain quirky charm and was faster than the MGA although
the MGA was better looking. The TR6 was better than the 4 and 5, but the 7
was definitely weird.

The Spitfires were rolling traffic hazards but they weren\'t completely
ugly. The best feature was the forward hinged bonnet so you could sit on
a tire while trying to figure out what was wrong with the engine.

What\'s really depressing is my Toyota econobox could outrun most of the
vintage British sports cars.
 
On 15-Feb-23 8:55 am, Don Y wrote:
A colleague sent along a copy of an article espousing a 2KW/hr/person
energy consumption rate as if it was a practical goal.

Yes, I\'m sure in some parts of the world, folks get by with
considerably *less*.

But, given that our cooling season will be starting RSN (despite
the fact that we\'re expecting ~20F overnight, this week) and
that guzzles power at an alarming rate.

I don\'t see any evidence that other parts of the country are
*considerably* more frugal/efficient, though.

www.eia.gov/consumption/residential/reports/2009/state_briefs/pdf/az.pdf
https://www.eia.gov/consumption/residential/reports/2009/state_briefs/

(Admittedly dated, no reflection on transportation)

A lot of improvements could in theory be made. Houses could be properly
insulated, and sealed, with ventilation provided via heat exchangers.
Entry and exit via rotating doors or air lock style arrangements, and so
on. Windows double or triple glazed, with controlled screens to permit,
or block, direct sunlight, depending on internal temperature. Systems to
store heat and cold, to balance day and night requirements.

Such improvements would limit the need for energy consuming heating and
cooling.

There would of course, be energy inputs to the manufacture and
installation of this stuff, which would have to be taken into account.

But the main issue, as always, is cost. As long as the energy costs are
less than the cost of the capital and maintenance required, it won\'t
happen without regulatory intervention, and the latter is unlikely
because it increases the costs suffered by voters.

A more irksome problem is lack of knowledge. People do not always act in
their own best financial interests, and do not necessarily trust correct
advice that seems counter-intuitive, especially if it comes from
politicians.

Sylvia.
 
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 12:57:59 -0600, Mark Lloyd wrote:


My mother told me about that, using the phone\'s hookswitch. Its a way to
make calls when you weren\'t supposed to and the dial had been disabled
or removed. I seem to remember doing that once.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2600:_The_Hacker_Quarterly

Fun with the phone system... A couple of students set up what amounted to
a PBX in the dorms, something that was completely illegal in the \'60s when
Ma Bell owned everything including the telephone itself. They were
expelled but the rumor was they found gainful employment at AT&T
immediately.

I had one phone that I\'d decorated with acrylic paint in a bored moment. I
got a strange look when I handed it in at the phone store but I imagine
they got phones back in worse shape. It really wasn\'t a good idea to
attach a convenient hammer to something as likely to piss a person off as
a phone. Those old Bakelite handsets had heft to them.
 
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 11:36:31 +1100, John Larkin
<jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 10:16:13 +1100, \"Rod Speed\"
rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:

On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 07:27:02 +1100, NY <me@privacy.net> wrote:

On 14/02/2023 18:54, Rod Speed wrote:
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 05:30:17 +1100, Carlos E. R.
robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:

On 2023-02-14 19:18, Rod Speed wrote:
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 01:17:43 +1100, Ian Jackson
ianREMOVETHISjackson@g3ohx.co.uk> wrote:
In message <op.10bquhfubyq249@pvr2.lan>, Rod Speed
rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> writes
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 08:00:14 +1100, NY <me@privacy.invalid> wrote:




Yes, I\'m not saying that Japanese grass and veg is blue, just
they
(apparently) used the same word to describe both green and blue.

Sounds unlikely given that they must have noticed that the sky and
grass arent the same color

Languages are strange things,
Specially the ones like english which have hijacked
useful words from any language of a country they
have fucked over or had anything to do with.

and some don\'t have words for the bleedin\' obvious.
Can\'t think of any examples of that.

For example, Latin and in Gaelic seem to have difficulty with the
simple concept of \'Yes\' and \'No\'.
Presumably because they prefer more subtle variations of those
words.
Same with languages which dont have a simple \'you\' and
have different words used for those you know well and
those you don\'t.

English uses \"you\" for both plural and singular.
Some use the word yous for the plural. I used to say \'you too\'
when asking the parents what they planned to do when together
and for some reason my stupid step mother didnt like that phrase.

\"Thou\" is not used.
I didn\'t mean that. I meant when two different words are
used in some languages like german for people who are
familiar to the speaker or not.

Yes, that is/was the distinction between thou (familiar) and you
(formal) - the exact same distinction as between tu/vous and du/Sie,
although vous and Sie can both mean you (plural) as well as you
(formal).

English probably could do with a plural form of you;

It already has a couple of informal ones, yous and you-all for yanks.

I used to say \'you two\' when asking the parents say where they would
be at a certain time etc, but my step mother didn\'t like that style. She
was a rather silly woman tho, hated the use of the word holidays for
university students, insisted on vacation for some reason.

the distinction between familiar and formal is less important.

We do have one here, \'darl\', even when referring to a man.

dawlin

That\'s what ours is derived from.

and honey in the south, by salesgirls for example. That\'s sort
of nice.

\'you bugger\' is common between men here.
 
On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 12:45:30 +1100, Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid>
wrote:

On 2023-02-16 16:26, Scott Lurndal wrote:
micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> writes:
In alt.home.repair, on Thu, 16 Feb 2023 13:30:34 +0100, \"Carlos E.R.\"
robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
On 2023-02-16 05:45, micky wrote:
In alt.home.repair, on Wed, 15 Feb 2023 23:32:44 +0100, \"Carlos
E.R.\" <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:


I think all houses have circuit breakers, but that doesn\'t mean they
have a fully compliant installation.

I don\'t think they\'ve ever ordered that here. Althought some people
remodel and upgrade on their own. A friend bought a 100-year old
farmhouse about 10 years ago and it still had knob and tube wiring. I
think it was connected and in use.
A lot of insurance companies will exclude electric-caused issues
from the policy if the home has knob and tube here in the states.

I had to look it up.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knob-and-tube_wiring

I\'ve never seen it here. Maybe, just maybe, something related from
before I was born. But we don\'t build houses with wood, like in the
photos. All brick, mortar, stone, concrete.

Bullshit.
https://www.google.com/search?q=wooden+houses+spain&tbm=isch
 
On 11/02/2023 08:16, Commander Kinsey wrote:
Why do circuit breakers go up for on and down for off? Would they work
installed upside down?
I haven\'t read the replies....
So you can\'t turn them on by accident?
 
On 2/14/2023 5:56 PM, Sylvia Else wrote:
A lot of improvements could in theory be made. Houses could be properly
insulated, and sealed, with ventilation provided via heat exchangers. Entry and
exit via rotating doors or air lock style arrangements, and so on. Windows
double or triple glazed, with controlled screens to permit, or block, direct
sunlight, depending on internal temperature. Systems to store heat and cold, to
balance day and night requirements.

Such improvements would limit the need for energy consuming heating and cooling.

There would of course, be energy inputs to the manufacture and installation of
this stuff, which would have to be taken into account.

But the main issue, as always, is cost. As long as the energy costs are less
than the cost of the capital and maintenance required, it won\'t happen without
regulatory intervention, and the latter is unlikely because it increases the
costs suffered by voters.

The timespans involved are often working against such \"investments\".
Am I going to bother installing an energy saving improvement if I
am unlikely to be able to recover its costs in the time that I
own the improved item?

And, there are a shitload of externalities that are glossed over.

Do you count the energy involved in rebuilding a home destroyed
by a hurricane? Earthquake? Flood? Landslide? *If* the area
is known to be PRONE to such events? (insurers factor those things
into their insurance premiums; shouldn\'t they also be \"charged\"
to the occupants of such areas?)

We rely on water pumped into the region from the Central Arizona
Project (a ~300mi long manmade canal augmented with pumping stations,
etc.). Shouldn\'t our energy budget reflect the (energy) cost of
moving that water? And, the energy expended in the creation (and
administration/maintenance) of that structure?

If you don\'t consider these, then you are likely to continue
practices that are unnecessarily wasteful of energy.

[Should The Netherlands have to reflect the energy cost of all that
reclaimed land in their energy budgets? Folks living on islands
that can\'t grow enough food to feed their populations? etc.]

A more irksome problem is lack of knowledge. People do not always act in their
own best financial interests, and do not necessarily trust correct advice that
seems counter-intuitive, especially if it comes from politicians.

Here, the problem is the (relatively low) cost of energy. Folks
cringe at $4 gas. What\'s a liter cost in the EU?

And, there are so many things that don\'t identify their energy costs
in a meaningful way. There\'s no \"fuel gauge\" on most devices
that alerts you (indirectly) to how often you have to \"fill up\"
and no way of gauging how long that \"tank\" will last you...
 
On Monday, February 13, 2023 at 3:30:45 PM UTC-8, John Larkin wrote:

One chemical was banned in the US, at a cost of about a billion
dollars, the ban expected to save about 0.001 lives.

Citation, or it didn\'t happen.

Cost, and benefits, all listed, and the chemical identified.
 
In message <tsqpfn$1mha$2@dont-email.me>, Max Demian
<max_demian@bigfoot.com> writes
On 18/02/2023 13:14, The Natural Philosopher wrote:



\"The Electricity (Supply) Act 1919 merged the 600-odd local
generating companies into area boards, who in turn were centralised
into the Central Electricity Board by the Electricity Supply Act
1925. That is when the voltage was standardised at 240V, and the
National Grid created.

And then the EU stole ten of our good, English volts!

Have we got them back yet?

We never lost them. In most places, the usual voltage is still around
240V. Without painstakingly checking the latest spec, the official UK
tolerance is 230V +10%/-6%, and the European is 230V +10%/-10%. [You do
the maths!] In my home, it\'s usually between 236 and 240V.
--
Ian
 
On 2023-02-15 00:15, Don Y wrote:
On 2/14/2023 3:15 PM, Carlos E.R. wrote:
On 2023-02-14 22:55, Don Y wrote:
A colleague sent along a copy of an article espousing a 2KW/hr/person
energy consumption rate as if it was a practical goal.

Total energy, or just electricity?

Because my house is capped to 2300 watts of electricity. My hot water
and frugal heating is on butane.

I think the point was total energy consumption.  Otherwise, it
is super easy to meet -- just shift all of your energy consumption
to non-electric means.

Well, it depends a lot.

It depends on the climate of where you live. And transportation, which
can be private or public, short distance/medium/long.

You have to specify the environment.

Without considering the heating/cooling, and transportation, I can
certainly live under 2KW. I do, in fact. If it is an average, measured
over the whole day, then I can also add heating/cooling to the mix. No
problem.

If you are USAian, then you can\'t :p


Most homes, here, have 100A (or 200A) service -- so, figure
a rate of ~20,000W or 40,000W.  (I\'ve lived in homes with
~60A services -- ~12KW -- and found it really cramped)

Most people here have a 3..4 Kw limit on the whole house.

--
Cheers, Carlos.
 
On Tuesday, February 14, 2023 at 9:41:16 AM UTC-8, Rod Speed wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 23:33:31 +1100, Max Demian <max_d...@bigfoot.com
wrote:

On 13/02/2023 21:48, Rod Speed wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 08:00:14 +1100, NY <m...@privacy.invalid> wrote:
\"Rod Speed\" <rod.sp...@gmail.com> wrote in message

Yes, I\'m not saying that Japanese grass and veg is blue, just they
(apparently) used the same word to describe both green and blue.
Sounds unlikely given that they must have noticed that the sky and
grass arent the same color

.... and new grass blades aren\'t the same color as older ones.
But they\'re both called by the same name.

But everyone else has a separate word for green and blue,
so its more than a tad unlikely that the Japs didn\'t too.

Oh, there\'s a separate word for \'wave\' and \'tsunami\' in English.
But, probably it used to be \'wave and \'tidal wave\' (i.e. no English word for it).
 
micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> writes:
In alt.home.repair, on Sat, 18 Feb 2023 00:30:30 -0000, \"Commander
Kinsey\" <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 07:01:02 -0000, micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> wrote:

In alt.home.repair, on Wed, 15 Feb 2023 01:57:40 -0500, Clare Snyder
clare@snyder.on.ca> wrote:


Mine has no output jacks or cords. Just a small nice wooden cabinet
with no holes, no jacks, maybe one 12\" wire as a transmitting antenna (I
have to go look again. Not sure if there\'s a wire.)

Ok, that\'s way more sophisticated, and more modern.
I\'ve never seen one like that.


Maybe 14 or 16\" square and 5\" high.

It might be from the 30\'s after my mother got married in 1929.

input of the radio, which was actually the audio amplifier section.

The radio could have a switch to disable the radio section or not, in
which case you would have to \"tune out\" the stations.

I have been lucky enough that there was no strong station at the
frequency. I left a note inside so I or the next owner doesn\'t have to
hunt for it.

The transmitter should be tunable.

...
Many were not, short of trimming the length of the antenna!!

Would that change the frequency?!

I didn\'t read carefully. I thought he said trimming the capacitor
that\'s in one of the tuned circuits.

No, trimming the length of the antenna would likely just decrease
transmission range.

That depends on the transmission frequency wavelength; e.g. if
the antenna was shorted from 1/2 wave to 1/4 wave, it will likely
not substantially change the transmission range (depending on
the frequency).
 
On Tuesday, 21 February 2023 at 07:54:34 UTC, Don Y wrote:
On 2/20/2023 11:18 PM, Tabby wrote:
One can find refrigerators at all different price points based on
size, reliability, warranty, appearance, features, etc.

how do you assess reliability?

By reputation and past experiences. It\'s not a guarantee but I

the reality is most buyers have little ability to assess electrical
reliability, and most high ticket appliances don\'t prove more reliable than
bog standard

You don\'t \"assess\" their reliability.

I do

You take note of experiences
your friends and neighbors have had, talk to neighbors who own
appliance stores and quiz them and their technicians about the
frequency (and cost) of service calls on various makes/models, etc.

shop kids just talk bs IME. A minority of places have someone that knows their subject

If you just walk into a store and buy something, caveat emptor.

none of the home despot links work. It doesn\'t matter, I\'m sure no
domestic fridge is worth 4k

One can live with a 1.5 cu ft refrigerator. Really! You just spend

obviously one can live with any size fridge, including zero

Of course! As I\'ve said numerous times, we opt for convenience,
here. You pitch something as a time saver not as an energy saver.
With most households having two wage earners, *someone* has
to come home from work and get dinner on the table in short
order. No \"Mom\'s\" to stay home all day and have dinner
*ready* and waiting.

Want an ice maker? Want something besides plain white? Water
dispenser (with internal filter)? Crushed ice? Through the door
dispensing? Counter depth? A camera to see what\'s inside without
opening the door (or, while you\'re off shopping)? Door-in-door?
HiTech?

No.

Icemaker is almost taken for granted.

I seldom see them here. Like most people I regard them as completely
pointless

I doubt I could find a kitchen with \"ice trays\" -- except in
the \"less advantaged\" parts of town. Most folks would have
the choice of ice *dispensed* in cube or crushed form.
Again, convenience.

We aren\'t obsessed with ice. It\'s little used, and when it is a tray is more convenient than having to clean out an inbuilt ice system every so often.


A bachelor might be satisfied with a plain white refrigerator

almost everyone is satisfied with plain white fridges here. If there\'s
anything wrong with that it\'s news to me.

Kitchen appliances routinely go through \"color changes\", here.
Stainless was \"in\". Then it wasn\'t. Black Stainless now seems to
be en vogue. White is typically a sign of a less expensive offering.
Sometimes black. You\'ll likely never find an almond or avocado
appliance purchased recently.

Some vendors allow the appearance of appliances to be altered
or customized. E.g., our dishwasher looks like a kitchen cabinet
as the controls are hidden and there is no need for a window
to view its contents.

Home buyers will note the \"color\" (for want of a better word) of
the kitchen appliances as a way to gauge how contemporary the
most recent remodel will have been.

(likely seldom cleaned) as the kitchen is just a *functional* place --
like the bathroom: prep meal and get the hell out!

straw man

Reality.

I find through-the-door a waste of useful volume as the interior of that
door is effectively forfeit to the icemaker/crusher and water dispenser.
But, folks with kids likely find it a big convenience as they aren\'t
constantly opening the door to the refrigerator just to get some ice or a
cold beverage.

we don\'t seem to suffer that problem. Maybe you live somewhere horribly hot

I would guess the refrigerator in most homes is opened dozens of times
each day (when occupied). Especially in homes with children or retirees.
Note that:

https://www.mylot.com/post/1542057/how-many-times-a-day-do-you-open-the-refrigerator

cites a study claiming \"22 times per person per day\". No idea if that
would truly be \"per person\" but, reading through the comments, others
have stated:
- \"i think if i sum up all the times that the fridge is opened by all
of us, it would exceed the 22 times a day average\"
- \"It’s hard to keep track, but I think with just me and my dog I still
exceed that number.\"
- \"I open mine about 12-15 times a day so well below average but the
majority of the time there is only me here, when the girls are home
that would at least double\"
- \"Its only 9 am and I know ive been in the fridge like 10 times already.\"
etc. So, \"often\" is likely a better figure for describing the
frequency that folks access (or view) the contents of their frigs.

we certainly don\'t open them that much. Maybe it\'s connected with obesity.

Newer refrigerators have tricks to reduce the number of times
the door must be opened. E.g., water and ice \"through the door\";
glass door panels and a means of switching the internal light
on WITHOUT opening the door (\"knock\") so you can \"browse\"
without having to let all the cooled air out; smaller doors that
allow access to a subset of the frig\'s contents without having
to open the \"real\" door(s), etc.

glass fronted fridges are much less energy efficient, so don\'t reduce energy use

https://newatlas.com/lg-door-in-door-super-capacity-fridge/23363/

(Note that it claims \"32 percent of the 1,000 or so American families
questioned said that their refrigerator door is opened between 20 and
50 times each day, with so-called \"go-to\" foods ranking high among the
regular quick grab and go visits.\")

Older (single door) refrigerators can be installed so the door
tends to close, even if not actively closed. This is not the case
on french door refrigerators where the door can partially close but
not seal. Refrigerators now have alarms that will detect if the door
is left open/ajar too long.

We drink cold water (unheated water is not cold, here -- esp in the
summer months!) from the refrigerator AFTER it has been filtered
to remove sediment and chlorine \"flavors\". How many glasses of water
do YOU drink, daily? Multiply by the number of occupants. Plus
a pot of coffee in the morning and two pots of tea (using filtered
water, of course)

most folk don\'t refrigerate their water

It would not be uncommon to open the door half a dozen times
while preparing a meal -- because you wouldn\'t want to leave
all of the ingredients (e.g., raw meat) \"out\" while you
were busy preparing other parts of the meal.

SWMBO opens the door probably hourly -- to fetch some chocolate,
cookies, cheese, etc. When the dogs were here, that was another
8 or 9 visits to the frig to retrieve their food (not counting
the times it was opened to *store* their food as it was prepared
in bulk).

Did I mention \"convenience\"?

Want to impress your friends? At only $10,400:

nor do I want to \'impress\' my friends with gross stupidity.

You likely are very practical -- walk or ride a bicycle everywhere (as
anything more than that would be extravagant?)

What do you do with the monies you have above and beyond what you *need*
to exist? Donate them back to The State? (then why didn\'t you retire all
those years earlier to ENJOY the time you have on the planet, instead of
working for \"non-stupid\" things?) Sounds pretty silly...

would it not be wise to get a clue about people\'s lives before making things
up & calling them silly?

You\'ve decided to throw shade on my, in particular (USAins, in general)
purchase decision:
\"why on earth would anyone pay 4k for domestic fridge\"

I asked what the point of a 4k fridge was & you\'ve confirmed that they have no real upside. I\'ve never seen a 4k fridge I\'d buy either.


So, I assume all of that money that you are saving (4000 less the
150 you quoted) is being used for *something*. Why not tell us how
you are spending those \"extra funds\" -- so we can mock *your* choices?

We all trade our time and skills for \"compensation\". We then convert
that compensation into other things that appeal to our own needs
and desires.

A neighbor drives a $300K car. And, is upset because his girlfriend
drives a $1.6M vehicle! (if he upgrades, might she, also? perhaps
best to live with the $300K vehicle -- at least until you know whether
or not she\'s a keeper!).

Other neighbors have second (and third) homes.

Or, $200K motor homes.

Or, jet around the world for most of the year.

\"Why would anyone _______________?\"
Ans: Because it\'s THEIR money obtained from THEIR labors and *that\'s*
what they chose to convert those labors into.

Of course, if you don\'t *have* the money, that\'s a different
story -- that\'s why they make small white refrigerators!

No, small white fridges are made because almost all of us find they meet our needs perfectly well. There are things worth paying extra for, and a fridge is simply not one of them. In fact the more expensive ones are less reliable, and I was quite glad to get rid of one I had years ago - no, not a 4k one :)
 
On 2/14/2023 6:17 PM, Carlos E.R. wrote:
Total energy, or just electricity?

Because my house is capped to 2300 watts of electricity. My hot water and
frugal heating is on butane.

I think the point was total energy consumption.  Otherwise, it
is super easy to meet -- just shift all of your energy consumption
to non-electric means.

Well, it depends a lot.

It depends on the climate of where you live. And transportation, which can be
private or public, short distance/medium/long.

You have to specify the environment.

In the US, there are wide variations in \"environments\".
I could \"get around\", when I lived in boston, much easier
(i.e., without personal transportation) than I can, here.
Folks who live in \"planned communities\" typically have
most services available in walking/(bike-)riding distances;
not so when the city sprawls...

Without considering the heating/cooling, and transportation, I can certainly
live under 2KW. I do, in fact. If it is an average, measured over the whole
day, then I can also add heating/cooling to the mix. No problem.

If you are USAian, then you can\'t :p

I\'m sure we *can*. We just don\'t *have* to. And, have very little
incentive to try.

People change their driving habits when gasoline prices climb above
$4/gallon... why do they change BACK when prices fall? (if you could
deal with driving less when prices were high, why can\'t you deal with
those same constraints when they are lower?)

Other forms of energy (natural gas, electricity) tend to see more
gradual changes in pricing. So, you just get accustomed to a
\"$10\" increase in your monthly bill. You might not be happy with
it but it\'s not annoying enough to force changes in behavior.

[Most folks pay $100/month -- or more -- for phone service,
TV/internet, etc. If they are comfortable with that sort of outlay
for the capability of making and receiving phone calls, why would
they fret over a fraction of a dollar, per day, to continue with
the lifestyle to which they\'ve become accustomed?]

Most homes, here, have 100A (or 200A) service -- so, figure
a rate of ~20,000W or 40,000W.  (I\'ve lived in homes with
~60A services -- ~12KW -- and found it really cramped)

Most people here have a 3..4 Kw limit on the whole house.

I have some lower income, elderly friends that probably have
that much available to them in their \"apartments\". But, they
don\'t have room for multiple TVs, washer/dryer, full-size
refrigerator/range/dishwasher/microwave, garage, etc. They
*might* have a personal laptop and likely a phone. No
\"personal outdoor space\" or the energy/labor required to
maintain it. They\'re unlikely to have any hobbies/activities
that use large amounts of power (woodworking, lathe,
power tools, etc.) or the space to store those types of kit.

And, many of their energy needs are \"institutionalized\"...
there\'s a central heating/cooling plant, a cafeteria that
prepares meals, an \"activities room\" with TV and other
amusements, a \"computer room\" so they have internet access
without having to worry about maintaining a \"personal\"
computer, etc.
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top