T
Tom Gardner
Guest
On 18/03/20 01:52, Clifford Heath wrote:
I don't disagree, other than to note I'm neither American nor in
the US, so the politics aren't mine
It is a variant of Eisenhower's military-industrial complex.
Somehow I doubt James will agree.
On 18/3/20 10:47 am, Tom Gardner wrote:
On 17/03/20 23:41, Clifford Heath wrote:
On 18/3/20 5:38 am, dagmargoodboat@yahoo.com wrote:
On Sunday, March 15, 2020 at 7:58:06 PM UTC-4, Clifford Heath wrote:
The number of critical cases not surviving the COVID-19 virus is linked
to the limited availability of ventilators. So I'm looking at my
extensive collection of project materials and thinking "how hard can it
be to make a ventilator? How many could I make in the next two weeks?"
Can anyone summarise the key components and functions of these things?
I'm assuming some kind of motor-driven bellows, and a face mask, but...
what else?
Clifford Heath.
Just a sketch of the systems / function --
o fail-safe battery backup
o measure volume inspired/expired, pressure
o modes: force respiration rate, or detect & assist patient breathing effort
o monitor patient's 02 saturation
o alarm, for various out-of-bounds conditions
I've not seen masks used in the ICU; all the vents I saw required
intubation, with an inflatable balloon used to seal the tube in
the patient's airway.
This page is a decent start...
https://www.medtronic.com/covidien/en-us/support/products/mechanical-ventilation/puritan-bennett-pb980-ventilator.html
Here's the manual for a portable unit:
https://www.medonegroup.com/pdf/manuals/techManuals/Respironics-V60-Service-Manual.pdf
Note that it is *illegal* to manufacture, sell, or use w/o FDA approval.
James, thanks.
"Illegal" in the USA has (for decades) been under the control of a cartel of
medical, legal and insurance industries which has deprived US citizens of the
basic affordable health care that's standard in almost every other part of
the world. That cartel must be broken, and this is quite possibly the trigger
to do it (though ventilators are probably not the first brick to be removed
from the wall).
People's appetite for risk changes when their loved ones start dying
unnecessarily.
There are good reasons for the law controlling the sale
of medical devices.
The US medical industry isn't one of those reasons.
"Cartel" isn't inappropriate.
It is appropriate, but the health care workers aren't party to it.
Liability lawyers are mostly responsible (taking advantage of your
hyper-individualistic politics), and then insurance companies.
Manufacturers certainly don't mind having very high barriers to entry - that's
one of the factors that determine the profitability of an industry.
Strangely enough, insurance co's love big payouts, because it gives them a
reason to extract and pocket more of the nation's GDP in premiums.
Cartel is exactly the right term.
I don't disagree, other than to note I'm neither American nor in
the US, so the politics aren't mine
It is a variant of Eisenhower's military-industrial complex.
Somehow I doubt James will agree.