Toshiba TV29C90 problem; Image fades to black...

[RapidRonnie]

Jumpster Jiver wrote:

gerryu21220@gmail.com wrote:
Oh, man... really? Is that the same as the infamous "Skippy"?

I'm curious: if this guy is such bad news, how did he ever get a 1500+
positive feedback rating on eBay? Wouldn't he get a lot more negative
feedback? Not trying to defend him - don't know this person, nor dealt
with him. Just puzzled.

Gerry

It probably means he is a good seller on ebay, especially if he has a
100% (or near that) positive rating.
Bu it also means he does not know the rules about where you may spam
advertisements about your items for sale.

He knows them very well. ebay has purposefully turned a bad eye to
this kind of thing. I punish ebay about twice a week with my own secret
methods.

 

[boardjunkie]

On Jan 24, 7:08 am, "Mark D. Zacharias" <spamme...@nonsense.net>
wrote:

And you are lucky if the 1000TW is more than about 15 watts per channel.
This model predates the FTC enforcements of the '70s.

People should stop selling amps based on power consumption rather than
output. Either it's ignorance or dishonesty. Take your pick.

Mark Z.

That model is rated at 50wrms/ch.
http://www.classic-audio.com/pioneer/SX1000TW.html

If anything, audio amps made during the 70s were *underrated* in terms
of output power.

'Specially compared to the consumer junk produced today.

 

[Mark D. Zacharias]

"boardjunkie" <boardjunkie@techie.com> wrote in message
news:1169675594.807822.229800@v45g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...

On Jan 24, 7:08 am, "Mark D. Zacharias" <spamme...@nonsense.net
wrote:
And you are lucky if the 1000TW is more than about 15 watts per channel.
This model predates the FTC enforcements of the '70s.

People should stop selling amps based on power consumption rather than
output. Either it's ignorance or dishonesty. Take your pick.

Mark Z.

That model is rated at 50wrms/ch.
http://www.classic-audio.com/pioneer/SX1000TW.html

If anything, audio amps made during the 70s were *underrated* in terms
of output power.

'Specially compared to the consumer junk produced today.

I'm pretty skeptical. As I recall, this model has pretty small heat sinks.
Pioneer didn't really get with the program til after the SX-828 etc. Many
models were over rated prior to that time.

If I remember I'll look it up at work - I've got most of the old Pioneer
manuals.

In any case the guy selling this piece overstated the power by at least a
factor of 3X .

Mark Z.

 

[Meat Plow]

On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 04:04:38 +0000, Mark D. Zacharias Has Frothed:

"boardjunkie" <boardjunkie@techie.com> wrote in message
news:1169675594.807822.229800@v45g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...


On Jan 24, 7:08 am, "Mark D. Zacharias" <spamme...@nonsense.net
wrote:
And you are lucky if the 1000TW is more than about 15 watts per channel.
This model predates the FTC enforcements of the '70s.

People should stop selling amps based on power consumption rather than
output. Either it's ignorance or dishonesty. Take your pick.

Mark Z.

That model is rated at 50wrms/ch.
http://www.classic-audio.com/pioneer/SX1000TW.html

If anything, audio amps made during the 70s were *underrated* in terms
of output power.

'Specially compared to the consumer junk produced today.


I'm pretty skeptical. As I recall, this model has pretty small heat sinks.
Pioneer didn't really get with the program til after the SX-828 etc. Many
models were over rated prior to that time.

IIRC 45 watts/ch @8ohms.
--
Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, June 2004

COOSN-266-06-25794

 

[Mark D. Zacharias]

Meat Plow wrote:

On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 04:04:38 +0000, Mark D. Zacharias Has Frothed:


"boardjunkie" <boardjunkie@techie.com> wrote in message
news:1169675594.807822.229800@v45g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...


On Jan 24, 7:08 am, "Mark D. Zacharias" <spamme...@nonsense.net
wrote:
And you are lucky if the 1000TW is more than about 15 watts per
channel. This model predates the FTC enforcements of the '70s.

People should stop selling amps based on power consumption rather
than output. Either it's ignorance or dishonesty. Take your pick.

Mark Z.

That model is rated at 50wrms/ch.
http://www.classic-audio.com/pioneer/SX1000TW.html

If anything, audio amps made during the 70s were *underrated* in
terms of output power.

'Specially compared to the consumer junk produced today.


I'm pretty skeptical. As I recall, this model has pretty small heat
sinks. Pioneer didn't really get with the program til after the
SX-828 etc. Many models were over rated prior to that time.

IIRC 45 watts/ch @8ohms.

I checked at work. It was 45 watts IHF per channel. You'd have to derate it
somewhat for RMS. Also, the heat sinks were simply too small to maintain the
output for very long. Power consumption from the wall was rated 175 watts
max.

To get 150 per channel from this would be a miracle indeed.

Like I said. Ignorance or dishonesty, take your pick.

Mark Z.

 

[cyleamoore]

I dont have the schematics and this is a very large heavy TV.

Could I get the schematics and a parts list that you used to replace
the blown cap's.

Please send to cyleamoore@yahoo.com


--
cyleamoore
------------------------------------------------------------------------
cyleamoore's Profile: http://www.futurehardware.in/member.php?userid=690
View this thread: http://www.futurehardware.in/showthread.php?t=242077

Future Hardware - http://www.futurehardware.in

 

[Reinhard Zwirner]

Hi

Yesterday I received the answer to my question (and the datasheet):
my searched for A/D converter is a Siliconix LD 130.
Unfortunately I'll have to pay 50.- Euros for a new one :-( ....
But perhaps someone here might know a less expensive source.

CU

Reinhard

 

[Michael Kennedy]

I have something for you discussion forum...

Stop Spamming our Newsgroup!


"Shaine" <shanugulati@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1169905283.029219.180930@a34g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...

We have just launched a new Search Engine - http://www.ogleo.com
Kindly have a look and give us your suggestions here:
Ogleo Discussion Forum http://forum.ogleo.com

Links:
======
Ogleo Home Page - http://www.ogleo.com
Ogleo Traffic Details - http://ogleo.com/traffic
Ogleo Discussion Forums - http://forum.ogleo.com

About Ogleo.com
===============
Ogleo.com is an integrated search tool which integrates various
services to serve best of the web to its users. Ogleo word has been
derived from word Ogle \O"gle\, n, which means to look at. At this
time we have integrated 5 different services in Ogleo.com i.e. Web
Results, Questions and Answers, Dictionary Definitions, Encyclopedia
Content and Images.

Our Mission
Ogleo's aim is to integrate the information which is available with
various content providers so that anyone can access the world's
information in a single click.

Future Plans
In future we have planned to integrate more services in Ogleo.com e.g.
News, Shopping, Photos, Videos, Whois, Jobs, Directories, Groups and
Yellow Pages etc.

===Please don't forget to forward this message to your friends===
ALSO DON'T FORGET TO MAKE OGLEO.COM YOUR HOME PAGE

Thanks
Ogleo.com Team

 

[Leonard Caillouet]

"cyleamoore" <cyleamoore.2l2y4v@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:cyleamoore.2l2y4v@nospamplease.com...

I dont have the schematics and this is a very large heavy TV.

Could I get the schematics and a parts list that you used to replace
the blown cap's.

Please send to cyleamoore@yahoo.com

It should not require schematics to fix these is most cases. You need to
repair the vertical output circuit and check the set thoroughly for leaky
and high ESR caps. No one can predict which parts you need to change,
though it might be possible to guess.

Leonard

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
It has removed 23012 spam emails to date.
Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
Try SPAMfighter for free now!

 

[Mr. Dejager]

I'm New to this thred... and web sight! I have the manual for a Micronta
22-025 in PDF form for any one that needs it. But How to get it to you?
Explane for the newbee!
Thanks
MDJ


--
Mr. Dejager
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr. Dejager's Profile: http://www.futurehardware.in/member.php?userid=714
View this thread: http://www.futurehardware.in/showthread.php?t=233669

Future Hardware - http://www.futurehardware.in

 

[Homer J Simpson]

"Mr. Dejager" <Mr.Dejager.2l6vsq@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:Mr.Dejager.2l6vsq@nospamplease.com...

I'm New to this thred... and web sight! I have the manual for a Micronta
22-025 in PDF form for any one that needs it. But How to get it to you?

Post the manual on http://rapidshare.com/ and post the link on this site.

Do sign up first for free - you might as well get the brownie points if any.

--
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..

 

[UCLAN]

Frank wrote:

I have to ask you "were have you started to read this message"
AT THE TOP OF THE PAGE wanker

Please re-write the above in English ("were have you started...??)

So why the fuck do bottom posting wankers want you to spend time scrolling
down a page of crap looking for were the new message starts ?

Because that is the way conversation occurs. I like to read the question
*BEFORE* the answer, not after it.

 

[kaboom]

Frank wrote:

I have to ask you "were have you started to read this message"
AT THE TOP OF THE PAGE wanker

Nice troll, but:

"Posting at the top because that's where the cursor happened to
be is like shitting in your pants because that's where your
asshole happened to be."

Bye bye now!

 

[Charles Schuler]

"kaboom" <kaboomicus@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:45c50407.12087406@news.snet.sbcglobal.net...

Frank wrote:

I have to ask you "were have you started to read this message"
AT THE TOP OF THE PAGE wanker

Nice troll, but:

"Posting at the top because that's where the cursor happened to
be is like shitting in your pants because that's where your
asshole happened to be."

Got a good laugh from that!

However, I am flexible enough to deal with top posts, interspersed posts (my
favorite), or bottom posts. I guess these kinds of controversies distract
us from the serious problems that we all face.

 

[Dr. Anton T. Squeegee]

In article <45c4d847@clear.net.nz>, erty@home.com (known to some as
Frank) scribed...

I have to ask you "were have you started to read this message"
AT THE TOP OF THE PAGE wanker

<childish and rude rant snipped>

It is obvious that you are new to the Internet in general, Usenet
in particular, and that you really need to get out more and tune those
social skills.

Usenet has been around since at least the late 70's, and has very
well-established rules of the road, which were established for excellent
reasons.

These two sites do a great job of explaining why top-posting on
Usenet is a Bad Thing.

http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/gey_chr0.htm

http://www.html-faq.com/etiquette/?toppost



With that out of the way... *PLONK!*


--
Dr. Anton T. Squeegee, Director, Dutch Surrealist Plumbing Institute
(Known to some as Bruce Lane, KC7GR)
http://www.bluefeathertech.com -- kyrrin a/t bluefeathertech d-o=t calm
"Salvadore Dali's computer has surreal ports..."

 

[Bill Harris]

I should experiment before posting, I know. I had the cassette deck
that wouldn't play more than a few seconds. When I opened the lid, I
found an optical interrupter attached to the tape counter, and it wasn't
moving. I tried spinning it by hand when it was in play mode, and it
began turning. At that point, the tape deck kept running. FWIW, the
interrupter was connected to the transport with two belts in series.
I'm not yet sure if the problem is internal to the transport or in the
pulley that connects those two belts; I think it may be internal to the
transport.

Torque still seems low, for rewind is not much good, and fast forward is
more like forward with no sound.

From http://repairfaq.ece.drexel.edu/sam/audiofaq.htm#audtcdrw, I
presume that http://repairfaq.ece.drexel.edu/sam/audiofaq.htm#audgeng or
perhaps http://repairfaq.ece.drexel.edu/sam/audiofaq.htm#audlube (mostly
to warn me not to do this) may be my friend.

In particular, I'm guessing that some belt is no longer in the prime of
its life. Any further tips (e.g., whether I'm likely on the right
track, whether there are diagrams for removing and replacing the rubber
belts and pulleys, or sources for replacement belts -- I did check the
FAQ but didn't find any information) would be appreciated.

TIA,

Bill
--
Bill Harris

 

[Meat Plow]

On Mon, 05 Feb 2007 02:10:02 +0000, Dave Boxner Has Frothed:

I have a Tektronix 561A with a bad CRT. I have another 561A with a good
CRT but bad chassis.

How to swap CRTs and make one good scope without shocking the bejeezus
out of myself...?

Which pin on the CRT, looking from the back, to short and discharge...?

TIA

Dave

I'll send you over to sci.electronics.repair for an answer.

--
Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, June 2004

COOSN-266-06-25794

 

[Mike Berger]

The point is that in a threaded news reader, you have ALREADY read
the question. Why do you need to read it again (and again)?

For an example, look at the thread called "Power Amp Repair"
from 2/3/2007. As you read succeeding messages, all you see
after a while is repeated text -- the same thing repeated over
and over, redundantly, again and again and again -- unless you
go to the trouble of scrolling down to try to pick out whatever
line of new advice has been added to the preceeding 300 lines of
repeated text.

In other words, bottom-posting without significant editing and
trimming just makes it much harder to follow the thread in the
first place. Unless you're completely obsessive about how
you read things, or have such a short attention span that you
immediately forget what you just read, bottom-posting makes no
sense at all.

Since it takes a lot of extra time to switch from frame to frame
and scroll down, I usually ignore messages that don't show something
new in the first frame.

UCLAN wrote:

Frank wrote:

I have to ask you "were have you started to read this message"
AT THE TOP OF THE PAGE wanker

Please re-write the above in English ("were have you started...??)

So why the fuck do bottom posting wankers want you to spend time
scrolling
down a page of crap looking for were the new message starts ?

Because that is the way conversation occurs. I like to read the question
*BEFORE* the answer, not after it.

 

[Michael A. Terrell]

"Mr. Dejager" wrote:

I'm New to this thred... and web sight! I have the manual for a Micronta
22-025 in PDF form for any one that needs it. But How to get it to you?
Explane for the newbee!

news:alt.binaries.schematics.electronic allows you to post PDF files.

--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida

 

[Jim Land]

"lee jae kyung" <leelk3@kornet.net> wrote in news:eq900c$6ij$1
@news2.kornet.net:

We are sell of device for cellular phone :

I are not buy of your device for any thing!!!