D
DarkMatter
Guest
On Sun, 6 Jul 2003 17:05:01 -0700, "bigmike" <bigmike@cornhusker.net>
Gave us:
Gave us:
K
Ken Taylor
Guest
"ob723bg9" <NOspam@freak.net> wrote in message
news:3F089954.3921094E@freak.net...
build the system so it drank the tea for you as well.
Ken
news:3F089954.3921094E@freak.net...
left work and the kettle would be hot when you got home. I'm sure you could
build the system so it drank the tea for you as well.
Ken
P
Paul Burridge
Guest
On Sun, 6 Jul 2003 05:57:27 -0700, "JohanWagener"
<rebeldog@webmail.co.za> wrote:
:->
<rebeldog@webmail.co.za> wrote:
Aluminium, lead, cadmium, strontium, plutonium.... why the problem?
:->
J
John Fields
Guest
On Sun, 6 Jul 2003 17:05:01 -0700, "bigmike" <bigmike@cornhusker.net>
wrote:
--
John Fields
wrote:
Sure you can, haven't you ever heard of Schroedinger's cat?^)
--
John Fields
B
bigmike
Guest
"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message
news:3F087BD4.4C15@armory.com...
the part of the people, and according to you, free will does not exist.
Can't have it both ways Stevie boy, make up your mind.
news:3F087BD4.4C15@armory.com...
They can't take back their planet Steve, that would suggest "Free Will" on
the part of the people, and according to you, free will does not exist.
Can't have it both ways Stevie boy, make up your mind.
R
Richard Lamb
Guest
ob723bg9 wrote:
Would that be a space (like) heater?
S
Steve Sousa
Guest
"Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:<3F078633.4A887D07@earthlink.net>...
You guys are so complicated...
A pic12508 running on it's internal 4MHz clock + an lm1881 sync
separator does the job just fine.
There's no need to digitize the video information. You just have to
clamp the undesired signals to black level, you do this by counting
lines and syncing(sp?) to the vertical sync, this happens at most at
15625Hz for the pal people, slow enough for a pic. With a discrete
sync separator and running the pic at 10MHz you could skip the lm1881.
Greetings
You guys are so complicated...
A pic12508 running on it's internal 4MHz clock + an lm1881 sync
separator does the job just fine.
There's no need to digitize the video information. You just have to
clamp the undesired signals to black level, you do this by counting
lines and syncing(sp?) to the vertical sync, this happens at most at
15625Hz for the pal people, slow enough for a pic. With a discrete
sync separator and running the pic at 10MHz you could skip the lm1881.
Greetings
B
Bill Sloman
Guest
GC <gary@gcavie.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message news:<MPG.1972aee6453514619896a1@news.cis.dfn.de>...
well-known glove-puppet, who continued her policies for the next three
years.
While the British National Health service is expensive in relative
terms, it is relatively cheap as health service go - about half the
price per head of the American system, and somewhere between 10% and
20% cheaper than the French and German systems. The quality of
service, averaged over the whole population is better than the U.S.
and only marginally worse than the French and German systems.
My impression is that the U.K. Labour Party is actually getting it
into a better state, but that it is taking a long time. We left
England before Blair was elected, so I'm pretty much reliant on the
Guardian Weekly - but at least our friends aren't telling us the sort
of horror stories they tell us about the privatised railways.
-----
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
No. She resigned after 11 years, to be replaced by John Major, the
well-known glove-puppet, who continued her policies for the next three
years.
While the British National Health service is expensive in relative
terms, it is relatively cheap as health service go - about half the
price per head of the American system, and somewhere between 10% and
20% cheaper than the French and German systems. The quality of
service, averaged over the whole population is better than the U.S.
and only marginally worse than the French and German systems.
My impression is that the U.K. Labour Party is actually getting it
into a better state, but that it is taking a long time. We left
England before Blair was elected, so I'm pretty much reliant on the
Guardian Weekly - but at least our friends aren't telling us the sort
of horror stories they tell us about the privatised railways.
-----
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
C
Clif Holland
Guest
I located the chips and then your e-mail bounced. Waste of my time.
--
Clif
"G. Skiffington" <skiffiREDUCEng@nbnet.nb.ca> wrote in message
news:3F00D36A.A36@nbnet.nb.ca...
--
Clif
"G. Skiffington" <skiffiREDUCEng@nbnet.nb.ca> wrote in message
news:3F00D36A.A36@nbnet.nb.ca...
B
bigmike
Guest
"bigmike" <bigmike@cornhusker.net> wrote in message news:...
will, and that their lives are destined to follow a givin path, not of their
own choosing. Rediculous, but convenient for him and his theories. Second,
Steve beleives everything is explainable through science. Occupational
hazard probably. In reality, his theories have more in common with stoicism
that with socialism. However, if you go back through Steve's post, you will
find one thing that is unfaultering - Steve does not like to be wrong, and
he will twist things around until he is right - EVERYTIME. For someone like
Steve to be interested in socialism, is no big surprise. Socialism was the
result of egomaniacs in the first place. I would be willing to be you
EVERYTHING I own, that Steve does not beleive one word of what he is saying
here. Not a snowball chance in hell. However, he is certainly hoping we will
he applies to just about everything he says. First, people do not have free
will, and that their lives are destined to follow a givin path, not of their
own choosing. Rediculous, but convenient for him and his theories. Second,
Steve beleives everything is explainable through science. Occupational
hazard probably. In reality, his theories have more in common with stoicism
that with socialism. However, if you go back through Steve's post, you will
find one thing that is unfaultering - Steve does not like to be wrong, and
he will twist things around until he is right - EVERYTIME. For someone like
Steve to be interested in socialism, is no big surprise. Socialism was the
result of egomaniacs in the first place. I would be willing to be you
EVERYTHING I own, that Steve does not beleive one word of what he is saying
here. Not a snowball chance in hell. However, he is certainly hoping we will
R
Ralph Mowery
Guest
I hate it when that hapens and usually send about the same thing back and
never try to resend the information. If people can not post with their own
email or a place where a reply will go without hunting around their address
for "remove this" junk they don't deserve a response. Doubt it slows down
the spam anyway.
"Clif Holland" <radio.service@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:RF3Oa.40713$n%5.40386@nwrddc02.gnilink.net...
never try to resend the information. If people can not post with their own
email or a place where a reply will go without hunting around their address
for "remove this" junk they don't deserve a response. Doubt it slows down
the spam anyway.
"Clif Holland" <radio.service@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:RF3Oa.40713$n%5.40386@nwrddc02.gnilink.net...
R
R. Steve Walz
Guest
DarkMatter wrote:
argument against me.
You just proved that you simply have no head for social or
philosophical thought as all.
Why do you even try when you embarrass yourself so?
-Steve
--
-Steve Walz rstevew@armory.com ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public
You were altogether and entirely unable to make one single logical
argument against me.
You just proved that you simply have no head for social or
philosophical thought as all.
Why do you even try when you embarrass yourself so?
-Steve
--
-Steve Walz rstevew@armory.com ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public
R
R. Steve Walz
Guest
John Larkin wrote:
needs to be for any reason.
But shoddiness is NOT a matter of "taste", only of deprivation.
What I'm saying is that all should be paid the same for each hour
they work, after their basic survival contribution, and they should
be guaranteed a home of their own, period.
-Steve
--
-Steve Walz rstevew@armory.com ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public
Yes, the insane are eligible, so then perhaps you would be!
You need experience in real life.
In my ideal society they are the same, no money can be saved or
needs to be for any reason.
With kids.
Sure you can, you buy things with your hours. You buy what you want.
But shoddiness is NOT a matter of "taste", only of deprivation.
What I'm saying is that all should be paid the same for each hour
they work, after their basic survival contribution, and they should
be guaranteed a home of their own, period.
-Steve
--
-Steve Walz rstevew@armory.com ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public
R
R. Steve Walz
Guest
DarkMatter wrote:
yourself with name-calling?? What? You're not embarrassed? That's
because you're STUPID, because you SHOULD be embarrassed!
-Steve
--
-Steve Walz rstevew@armory.com ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public
Why don't you try to think of logical arguments instead of embarrassing
yourself with name-calling?? What? You're not embarrassed? That's
because you're STUPID, because you SHOULD be embarrassed!
-Steve
--
-Steve Walz rstevew@armory.com ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public
R
R. Steve Walz
Guest
bigmike wrote:
but that's because you aren't very aware. Cause and effect in the
social evolutionary realm, and consequent evolution of thought, will
cause the people to get real fucking tired of taking shit from assholes
like you. That's not "free will" outside causation, it IS causa and
effect that makes social revolution inevitable.
-Steve
--
-Steve Walz rstevew@armory.com ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public
You don't understand the difference between "Free Will" and Awareness,
but that's because you aren't very aware. Cause and effect in the
social evolutionary realm, and consequent evolution of thought, will
cause the people to get real fucking tired of taking shit from assholes
like you. That's not "free will" outside causation, it IS causa and
effect that makes social revolution inevitable.
-Steve
--
-Steve Walz rstevew@armory.com ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public
R
R. Steve Walz
Guest
bigmike wrote:
think that cause and effect "Intends" anything, then QUIT USING THE
WORD!!
Stupid.
-Steve
--
-Steve Walz rstevew@armory.com ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public
It all revolves around your meaning of the word: "Intent". If YOU don't
think that cause and effect "Intends" anything, then QUIT USING THE
WORD!!
Then you think that you're unconscious.For example - if you
throw a rock in the air, it wants to come back down. I know what it means,
everybody knows what the hell it means. A scientist however, will
say -wrong! The rock cannot want to come back down - it cannot think. Well,
no shit sherlock
science sometimes, and a little more common sense - but they can't because
that's a Pathetic Fallacy! I think the person's use of "intent" was quite
accurate.
---------------------
Stupid.
-Steve
--
-Steve Walz rstevew@armory.com ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public
K
Kevin Aylward
Guest
Andrew VK3BFA wrote:
the other methods work if you can change your
conditions, there are well tried methods. The issue is determining what
the cause of the problem is.
One has to accept that the brain can "malfunction" for at least two
independent reasons, either by physical processes e.g. lack of some
chemical *or* some sort of brainwashing. It don't make sense to try and
fix your allocation problem in software if the problem is a fried memory
chip, neither does it make sense to add to add 100 speed up processors
if the code is slow because of wait loops.
Kevin Aylward
salesEXTRACT@anasoft.co.uk
http://www.anasoft.co.uk
SuperSpice, a very affordable Mixed-Mode
Windows Simulator with Schematic Capture,
Waveform Display, FFT's and Filter Design.
The pill, is arguably for hard *physical* causes.
the other methods work if you can change your
Only for its specific cause.
In a particular instance there is often a superior method. For certain
conditions, there are well tried methods. The issue is determining what
the cause of the problem is.
One has to accept that the brain can "malfunction" for at least two
independent reasons, either by physical processes e.g. lack of some
chemical *or* some sort of brainwashing. It don't make sense to try and
fix your allocation problem in software if the problem is a fried memory
chip, neither does it make sense to add to add 100 speed up processors
if the code is slow because of wait loops.
Kevin Aylward
salesEXTRACT@anasoft.co.uk
http://www.anasoft.co.uk
SuperSpice, a very affordable Mixed-Mode
Windows Simulator with Schematic Capture,
Waveform Display, FFT's and Filter Design.
F
Franc Zabkar
Guest
On Sun, 6 Jul 2003 08:18:19 -0700, "JohanWagener"
<rebeldog@webmail.co.za> put finger to keyboard and composed:
- Franc Zabkar
--
Please remove one 's' from my address when replying by email.
<rebeldog@webmail.co.za> put finger to keyboard and composed:
Sounds like a job for MacGyver.
- Franc Zabkar
--
Please remove one 's' from my address when replying by email.
R
R. Steve Walz
Guest
bigmike wrote:
of attention upon the processes within oneself, and the internal
self-modeling of one's self in a model of the physical world in order
to hypothesize, but in NO way does this mean that cause and effect in
your brain is somehow not functioning!
It does NOT require any control of cause and effect, nor any control
of what one must inevitably think because of the action of cause and
effect in the brain, nor what it was always going to think at this
moment.
anything that happens between your ears is exempted from the laws of
physics. Nonsense! You're also ignoring my thought-experiment that
PROVED that we cannot exert control of our own mind because WE ARE our
own mind, and therefore we must BE what we ARE, example: We cannot
change the tiniest idea we hold as true just as an act of will to
show that we are outside causation. We can lie about it, we can be
caused to do so by this connundrum, but we cannot actually change our
mind without a causative REASON, and if that REASON is sufficient, then
we cannot even STOP ourselves FROm changing our mind!!!!
change our own mind for NO causative REASON, that is, on a total WHIM,
why, then I could in mere moments, change where I THOUGHT I was, and
be totally lost to this reality quite irretrievably and be off in my
own version of reality and unable to decide my way back! Instead I am
forced to believe what I evolved to believe and remain a mind that is
"here", and must confront where I am IN REALITY. In fact that is the
very MEANING of Reality.
capitalism is somehow fair to people because it punishes them for
being "bad", a totally moralistic concept based on Xtian guilt and
shame.
This was born in the Inquisition when it was needed to justify torture
to the torturers, who were having a GREAT DEAL of emotional trouble
torturing people who were admitting to believing things that they
couldn't help believing, and stupidly telling the truth because they
believed wrongly that they were talking to the direct agents of the
"Lord God", and not mere stupid humans who were torturing them!!
Why these heretics were believing things such as the heliocentric
universe, and the existence of other planets!! They even believed
that the bible had not been shown to be the word of God, but merely
the words of men!!!
Surely these heretics had to be regarded as guilty for their beliefs,
they surely must have made some kind of pact with the devil to join
his side of the "battle" against God so that they could believe such
LIES and they must have done so intentionally out of disobedience to
God's will! To say they couldn't help believing as they did must
surely be a LIE and they LIARS INTENTIONALLY BEING EVIL!!!
You see what "Free Will" leads to, and where it came from????
Hmmmm?
-Steve
--
-Steve Walz rstevew@armory.com ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public
You're EXTREMELY confused. Awareness is the directing of the process
of attention upon the processes within oneself, and the internal
self-modeling of one's self in a model of the physical world in order
to hypothesize, but in NO way does this mean that cause and effect in
your brain is somehow not functioning!
It does NOT require any control of cause and effect, nor any control
of what one must inevitably think because of the action of cause and
effect in the brain, nor what it was always going to think at this
moment.
Anti-scientific religious blather. You're, in effect, pretending, that
anything that happens between your ears is exempted from the laws of
physics. Nonsense! You're also ignoring my thought-experiment that
PROVED that we cannot exert control of our own mind because WE ARE our
own mind, and therefore we must BE what we ARE, example: We cannot
change the tiniest idea we hold as true just as an act of will to
show that we are outside causation. We can lie about it, we can be
caused to do so by this connundrum, but we cannot actually change our
mind without a causative REASON, and if that REASON is sufficient, then
we cannot even STOP ourselves FROm changing our mind!!!!
Some do only because they are as confused as you are!!
Garbage, I've proven it does not, and that it CANNOT! If we could
change our own mind for NO causative REASON, that is, on a total WHIM,
why, then I could in mere moments, change where I THOUGHT I was, and
be totally lost to this reality quite irretrievably and be off in my
own version of reality and unable to decide my way back! Instead I am
forced to believe what I evolved to believe and remain a mind that is
"here", and must confront where I am IN REALITY. In fact that is the
very MEANING of Reality.
Absolutely! Your superstition is at the heart of the belief that
capitalism is somehow fair to people because it punishes them for
being "bad", a totally moralistic concept based on Xtian guilt and
shame.
This was born in the Inquisition when it was needed to justify torture
to the torturers, who were having a GREAT DEAL of emotional trouble
torturing people who were admitting to believing things that they
couldn't help believing, and stupidly telling the truth because they
believed wrongly that they were talking to the direct agents of the
"Lord God", and not mere stupid humans who were torturing them!!
Why these heretics were believing things such as the heliocentric
universe, and the existence of other planets!! They even believed
that the bible had not been shown to be the word of God, but merely
the words of men!!!
Surely these heretics had to be regarded as guilty for their beliefs,
they surely must have made some kind of pact with the devil to join
his side of the "battle" against God so that they could believe such
LIES and they must have done so intentionally out of disobedience to
God's will! To say they couldn't help believing as they did must
surely be a LIE and they LIARS INTENTIONALLY BEING EVIL!!!
You see what "Free Will" leads to, and where it came from????
Hmmmm?
-Steve
--
-Steve Walz rstevew@armory.com ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public
R
R. Steve Walz
Guest
Andrew VK3BFA wrote:
comes from it. This applies to pills or ideas, you're a product of
cause and effect.
idea, and not because it actually is or is not. If you decide not
to then you may get worse or better, again due to cause and effect.
-Steve
--
-Steve Walz rstevew@armory.com ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public
The abuse is freeof charge, and unrelated to me being right.
Whatever you decide to swallow, you cannot help your decision or what
comes from it. This applies to pills or ideas, you're a product of
cause and effect.
No, you take the pill if cause and effect makes you think it's a good
idea, and not because it actually is or is not. If you decide not
to then you may get worse or better, again due to cause and effect.
Nonsense, again you ignore cause and effect.
-Steve
--
-Steve Walz rstevew@armory.com ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public