Toshiba TV29C90 problem; Image fades to black...

Hi Franc,
How did you locate this source? I couldn't find one with Google!
Ziggy

Franc Zabkar wrote:
On 28 Apr 2005 19:00:21 -0700, "gstringe" <annsmg@comcast.net> put
finger to keyboard and composed:


Looking for source or cross for damper diode FMPG5F


The FMP-G5FS is available from http://www.bdent.com for $5.10.

The specs are:

Manufacturer: Sanken
Vrm : 1500V
Io : 10A
Ifsm : 50A
Vf : 1.7V @ 10A
Ir : 50uA
trr : 0.7us


- Franc Zabkar
 
On 29 Apr 2005 04:34:16 -0700, "alitonto" <alitonto@hotmail.com> put
finger to keyboard and composed:

A.T. by the way how do I remove an S from your email address?
My address, like those of many others, has been munged as an antispam
measure to prevent automatic harvesting by spambots. When you reply to
me by email, you need to locate my address in your headers and
manually correct it. I suggest you modify your own hotmail address to
avoid being deluged by spam.


- Franc Zabkar
--
Please remove one 's' from my address when replying by email.
 
On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 07:49:24 -0500, your name here <no@thanks.com> put
finger to keyboard and composed:

Hi Franc,
How did you locate this source? I couldn't find one with Google!
Ziggy
I typed the part number into the search engine at
http://www.usbid.com. This told me that the manufacturer was Sanken. I
then had two choices, the Allegro/Sanken website, or
http://www.bdent.com who I knew from past experience to be a Sanken
distributor.

Franc Zabkar wrote:
On 28 Apr 2005 19:00:21 -0700, "gstringe" <annsmg@comcast.net> put
finger to keyboard and composed:


Looking for source or cross for damper diode FMPG5F


The FMP-G5FS is available from http://www.bdent.com for $5.10.

- Franc Zabkar
--
Please remove one 's' from my address when replying by email.
 
Dr. Klahn <xxdpplus@yahoo.com> wrote:
I have two Radio Shack 12-250 weather radios here. Both are functional
except that they don't trip on the weekly SAME test. I conclude that
the SAME decoder is not working in either, and needs to be realigned.
Have you tried reprogramming the SAME codes in them, or maybe
programming them for an adjacent county served by your NWS transmitter?

I was under the impression that the SAME data is transmitted with a
standard-ish modulation scheme, like Bell 103 or something. It seems
like they'd use a standard chip for this that would run off a crystal
and not have anything to "align", other than the crystal frequency.
Does the normal audio sound OK?

The Rat Shock parts list http://support.radioshack.com/parts//51031.htm
mentions a 10.240 MHz crystal (probably part of the tuner) and what
is probably a 4.0 MHz ceramic resonator, which probably drives whatever
microprocessor it has. If this resonator is off, I could see it working
well enough to respond to keypresses and drive the display, but not well
enough to understand the data stream.

Matt Roberds
 
I had one of these recently that made me crazy. It turned out to be a lead
that was not trimmed that was laying over across a trace of the 12v supply
(near the FBT) and was pinched between the board and the plastic frame. The
coating on the trace had worn thin and it would short when the board was
moved around.

Leonard

"bimmer" <bimmer019@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1114882359.959859.206530@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
The subject TV, a Toshiba CZ32V51 exhibited the following symptoms
intermittantly: Upon startup, it immediately went into failsafe mode
with slow blinking front red led with black screen, no audio or video.
After about 5 - 10 minutes a normal picture would come on and last for
as long as viewing. Occasionally the picture would "flip" with what
sounded like it may be an arc over.
I was able to get into diagnostic mode with the following results.

Self check 23906826
Power: 000
Bus Line OK
Bus Cont OK
Block UV V1
QV01 QV01S

Finally, it no longer went into normal video mode but I was able to do
one more self check:

Self check 23906826
Power 000
Bus Line OK
Bus Cont NG H001
Block UV (in red letters) V1
QV01 QV01S (both in red letters)

Seems to point to H001 the tuner?
Can someone with experience with this diagnostic /set chassis series
N9ES help me interpret it and suggest a cure?

Thanks,

Fred
 
you would have to open it up, and inside are some lenticular mirrors the
image bounces off of when its scanned. The mirrors likely have a mild dust
buildup on them, which results in 'filtering' the image to a very light
impression.


<dude17@sacbeemail.com> wrote in message
news:1114885959.303397.110470@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
| X-No-Archive: Yes
|
| I have a brother MFC-9600 Printer/Scanner/Photocopier/Fax comobo unit.
| Recently I found out the photocopy doesn't work right. It would
| produce a very light print out similar to a unit very low on toner.
|
| The unit has plenty of toner left and the laser printing unit is in
| perfect order as it makes good, black prints when I send a print job to
| it from my computer.
|
| The scanner also produces good contrast when I scan to computer from
| the unit.
|
| I checked copy settings such as "document type" and "contrast" from
| maximum to minimum, but the unit continues to produce very light
| prints. Since the scanning and printing units are both in good working
| order, I don't understand why photocopier function won't work
| correctly.
|
| Any clue?
|
 
If the TV is the exact same model, you can safely swap the board. If there
are no faults with it, and no other faults in the set, it should work. You
will have to do the complete convergence setup on the board, since it was
set up to the other set.

If you call a technician who is experienced with Zenith sets, and has access
to Zenith parts, he should be able to properly service this for you. The
only obstical that the tech may run in to, is if there are any specialized
parts that have to come from Zenith only, and are no long available.

Sometimes the fault are some defective components that are generic, and they
can be purchased from most electronic parts suppliers.

There are very few excuses for not being able to properly service this for
you.

--

JANA
_____

"Al" <owl@digitex.net> wrote in message
news:1114890527.494398.81500@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
I have a 52 inch projection that I started having convergence problems
just about 2 months after the warranty went out. I live in a area
where the only repair is 40 to 50 miles away. We had a shop open up
and I took the tv there and he said the convergence board was out. He
kept the tv for about 4 months and never came across to get the board
or repair.
I have just curved lines on the screen now and see all the colors but
they won't go together. This tv says on the back mfg 1997. I got it
about 1999. It has been out for these 3 years or so.
Here is my question. I have a friend that had what appears to be the
same tv. His tv had a weak pix and the repair man came and turned up
something to get a bright pix but said that it was at it's max. Then a
year later this friends set went completely out.
If the tv is the same as mine can I try myself to take the convergence
board out and put his in. He says I can have it. Can some one tell me
where the board is or what I am looking for.
ANY AND ALL HELP APPRECIATED.
If you reply you might also send me an email to my email address
owl@digitex.net
THANKS
AL
 
Go to the source for the +33V, and service this part of the supply. In some
models of sets, this comes from the horiz output section, on the secondary
of the flyback. In other models, it comes from an output of the main power
supply.

--

JANA
_____

"Stefan Toftevall" <stefan.toftevall@bredband.net> wrote in message
news:c4f805eb.0504300341.1a3cad27@posting.google.com...
Hi all, another strange problem that I have:
Tandberg CTV model 7R63. No IF output from tuner, and the tuner is
good, (UV1316-philips) tried another one with no help. What seems
weird is, the +33V supply which the tuner requires, is actually
fluctating quite much, between 18V and 21V depending on which channel
is selected. I also made up a constant +33V supply and fed the tuner ,
but with no improvment. Since this tuner is I2C bus controlled I begin
to think the CPU could be bad, not sending anything to the tuner which
is confused. OSD and all other functions is good, also when using the
external inputs the set operates good. This speaks for the cpu should
be good. Any advice is appreciated,
Regards
Stefan
 
I cannot tell you the exact parts in your monitor. There are many components
that can cause this. The fault is most likely in the vertical blanking
circuits, or in the feedback section of the vertical amplifier section
(causing a vertical blanking phase error). If the vertical blanking drive is
not properly biasing off the CRT during retrace, these lines will be
visible.

Another cause is that the CRT can be going weak, and thus not properly
responding to the blanking bias during the retrace period.

The expensive part of this type of repair is the labour, unless the CRT is
defective. The tech can easily spend more than an hour or two to
troubleshoot for the defective components, and then have to change them.

If you look at the labour cost per hour in your area, this should give you a
good idea of the basic cost for servicing your monitor. Calculate this based
on 2 hours to be safe. As for the parts, if it is a number of small
electrolytic capacitors, the parts cost can be from about $3.00 to $20.00
depending on the amount and the types of capacitors.

In most shops where we are, this would cost about $80 to $140 average, as
said, depending on the exact nature of the fault. This is considering that
the parts involved are also as mentioned.

In my opinion, since I know of this model of monitor, I would be considering
a new monitor. After servicing it, if you consider the age, there is the
potential reliability factor to consider.

A 19 inch LCD pane. would be equivalent to about a 21 inch CRT monitor.
There are many advantages of an LCD screen over a CRT monitor. One of the
main things I like about the LCD monitors, is that there are no convergence
or purity errors.

With LCD monitors, there is no eyesore caused by the scanning electron beam,
and the UV emissions from the screen surface. These monitors are considered
much healthier for the users. If a woman is pregnant there is no worry from
any electromagnetic radiation, or X-Ray emissions. LCD monitors typically
draw about 1/3 to 1/4 of the power consumption, and have no high voltage, as
like in a CRT monitor.

The prices of the LCD monitors are lower than that of the equivalent CRT
monitors of only a small number of years ago.


--

JANA
_____

<Yamoron@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1114877010.829099.191090@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
I have a 21" Sony monitor and about 7 thin diagonal lines have appeared
on my screen. The look like faint aperture grille lines, but are
angled upward starting at the bottom left. It gives the monitor a
"Candy-Cane" appearance. They do not go away when the monitor is
disconnected from the computer, or with degaussing.

Any ideas of what has gone bad?

Approximate cost range to repair this?

I've spent quite a bit of time searching for clues to this problem so
any input would be greatly appreciated.
 
"JANA" <jana@ca.inter.net> wrote in message news:3dic0qF6r0kecU1@uni-berlin.de...
In my opinion, since I know of this model of monitor, I would be considering
a new monitor. After servicing it, if you consider the age, there is the
potential reliability factor to consider.

A 19 inch LCD pane. would be equivalent to about a 21 inch CRT monitor.
There are many advantages of an LCD screen over a CRT monitor. One of the
main things I like about the LCD monitors, is that there are no convergence
or purity errors.
Uh, yeah, and color gamut on LCDs absolutely SUCK,
especially compared to a Sony F520.
 
I believe you are seeing retrace lines, which means the brightness
level is too high even if set to zero. If this is the case Sony DAS
must be used to correct, or a hardware mod can be done.

First you should try the 'Image Restoration' available in your OSD
menus. Note that the monitor must be powered on for at least 30
minutes, without going into power save mode, for this option to be
available. Often this is all that is needed.

If this is not an option, or does not do the job, see the thread re
the Dell P1130 (same Sony CR1 chassis as your monitor) here
http://www.network54.com/Forum/thread?forumid=87612&messageid=1109559823

A resistor change could correct your problem. See the post at the end
of the thread, below...
"On the main board is a circuit like the P1110, I change the resistor
R941 22M Ohms to 16.8M, this gives 500 Volts on G2,
and I get a good brightness."

Wayne

On 30 Apr 2005 09:03:30 -0700, Yamoron@gmail.com wrote:

I have a 21" Sony monitor and about 7 thin diagonal lines have appeared
on my screen. The look like faint aperture grille lines, but are
angled upward starting at the bottom left. It gives the monitor a
"Candy-Cane" appearance. They do not go away when the monitor is
disconnected from the computer, or with degausing.

Any ideas of what has gone bad?

Approximate cost range to repair this?

I've spent quite a bit of time searching for clues to this problem so
any input would be greatly appreciated.
 
Not at work so I can't be sure about this model. Does it have a sheet feeder on
the scanner. (ie can you scan from the flat bed OR through a sheet feeder).
If so, try copying both ways and see if there is a difference.
The sheet feeder usually has a seperate window (narrow window the width of the
page) through which the scanner unit "sees" the paper, if the sheet feeder
fails but the flat bed works then this window may need cleaning (dry cloth is
best, denatured alcohol or gentle household cleaner if necessary). Another
thought, the internal mirrors may be used differently between sheet feed and
flat bed, there could be a clue there and maybe cleaning the mirrors would be
needed but only if one method of copying works and the other one fails.
There has to be a difference in the way the internal electronics operate when
scanning versus copying (different signal paths are opened up). If the results
are the same from sheet feeder and flat bed then I would change the scanner
bulb (sounds silly????, could be that it is on the edge of failure and the
difference in logic between scanning and copying is enough to make the
difference).
I assume it is not under warranty? If so then call your friendly local Brother
agent. You may want to call them anyway but I guess it will cost something to
do so.
Tony

dude17@sacbeemail.com wrote:
X-No-Archive: Yes

I have a brother MFC-9600 Printer/Scanner/Photocopier/Fax comobo unit.
Recently I found out the photocopy doesn't work right. It would
produce a very light print out similar to a unit very low on toner.

The unit has plenty of toner left and the laser printing unit is in
perfect order as it makes good, black prints when I send a print job to
it from my computer.

The scanner also produces good contrast when I scan to computer from
the unit.

I checked copy settings such as "document type" and "contrast" from
maximum to minimum, but the unit continues to produce very light
prints. Since the scanning and printing units are both in good working
order, I don't understand why photocopier function won't work
correctly.

Any clue?
 
In sci.electronics.repair Lockergnome1 <lockergnome1@earthlink.net> wrote:
I recently acquired several model 3184-H lasers made by Hughes Aircraft
Company Electron Dynamics Division. [...] Thus far I have not been able
to find any information on these; does anyone know anything about these
devices?
Run, don't walk, to http://repairfaq.ece.drexel.edu/sam/lasertoc.htm .

Matt Roberds
 
"Cobalt" <spam@linhax.com> wrote in message
news:VrOdneI1-N4gRO7fRVn-jQ@adelphia.com...
you would have to open it up, and inside are some lenticular mirrors the
image bounces off of when its scanned. The mirrors likely have a mild dust
buildup on them, which results in 'filtering' the image to a very light
impression.


dude17@sacbeemail.com> wrote in message
news:1114885959.303397.110470@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
| X-No-Archive: Yes
|
| I have a brother MFC-9600 Printer/Scanner/Photocopier/Fax comobo unit.
| Recently I found out the photocopy doesn't work right. It would
| produce a very light print out similar to a unit very low on toner.
|
| The unit has plenty of toner left and the laser printing unit is in
| perfect order as it makes good, black prints when I send a print job to
| it from my computer.
|
| The scanner also produces good contrast when I scan to computer from
| the unit.
|
| I checked copy settings such as "document type" and "contrast" from
| maximum to minimum, but the unit continues to produce very light
| prints. Since the scanning and printing units are both in good working
| order, I don't understand why photocopier function won't work
| correctly.
|
| Any clue?
|
Dirty optics leads to less light getting to the latent white
areas on the OPC, to neutralise the charge, and so toner
stays on the OPC leading to grey instead of white on the
paper.

Diverse Devices, Southampton, England
electronic hints and repair briefs , schematics/manuals list on
http://home.graffiti.net/diverse
Copier repair hints
http://www.divdev.fsnet.co.uk/copiers.htm
 
might add tosreports@aol.com


"Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:426B3AE3.A0EA7815@earthlink.net...
| "Mark D. Zacharias" wrote:
| >
| > RonGrossi382750@yahoo.com wrote:
| > > The reason some people don't know for sure
| > > if they are going to Heaven when they die
| >
| > >snip<
| >
| > Take this nonsense somewhere else. We deal in facts here.
| >
| > Mark Z.
|
|
| Mark, this spam is posted from an AOL account though Google groups,
| using a yahoo return adddress. Forward the message with full headers to
| AOL and complain
|
| *********************************************************
|
| Search results for: 172.142.183.161
|
|
| OrgName: America Online
| OrgID: AOL
| Address: 22000 AOL Way
| City: Dulles
| StateProv: VA
| PostalCode: 20166
| Country: US
|
| NetRange: 172.128.0.0 - 172.191.255.255
| CIDR: 172.128.0.0/10
| NetName: AOL-172BLK
| NetHandle: NET-172-128-0-0-1
| Parent: NET-172-0-0-0-0
| NetType: Direct Allocation
| NameServer: DAHA-01.NS.AOL.COM
| NameServer: DAHA-02.NS.AOL.COM
| NameServer: DAHA-07.NS.AOL.COM
| Comment: ADDRESSES WITHIN THIS BLOCK ARE NON-PORTABLE
| RegDate: 2000-03-24
| Updated: 2003-08-08
|
| TechHandle: AOL-NOC-ARIN
| TechName: America Online, Inc.
| TechPhone: +1-703-265-4670
| TechEmail: domains@aol.net
|
| OrgAbuseHandle: AOL382-ARIN
| OrgAbuseName: Abuse
| OrgAbusePhone: +1-703-265-4670
| OrgAbuseEmail: abuse@aol.net
|
| OrgNOCHandle: AOL236-ARIN
| OrgNOCName: NOC
| OrgNOCPhone: +1-703-265-4670
| OrgNOCEmail: noc@aol.net
|
| OrgTechHandle: AOL-NOC-ARIN
| OrgTechName: America Online, Inc.
| OrgTechPhone: +1-703-265-4670
| OrgTechEmail: domains@aol.net
|
| # ARIN WHOIS database, last updated 2005-04-23 19:10
| # Enter ? for additional hints on searching ARIN's WHOIS database.
 
"Lockergnome1" <lockergnome1@earthlink.net> writes:

I recently acquired several model 3184-H lasers made by Hughes Aircraft
Company Electron Dynamics Division. They are gold-colored cylinders,
about 12.25 inches long and 1.75 inches diameter. There are small
leads (red and green) coming out of the side near one end. One of them
had been disassembeled, and had contained a glass cylinder about 3/4 of
the length of the entire thing (maybe more, it had been broken and I
estimated based on the pieces I had). I also got a few rubber blocks
about 1.5 x 4.5 x 0.5 inches, labelled Hughes Model 3591H/01 Laser
Power Supply. These have 2 small wires (black and red) and one larger
red wire protruding from one face, and a rectangular block with two
holes in it on one end. Thus far I have not been able to find any
information on these; does anyone know anything about these devices?
They are HeNe lasers with plasma tubes having Brester window snd external
mirrors in the gold end-pieces. If you power these with a HeNe laser power
supply designe for 2-4 mW lasers with red as positive, they shoud light
up. But if you've removed and replaced the end-pieces, mirrors alignment
is all messed up.

All asmples I've seen of these lasers have been dead due to air leakage.

The other blocks might be ballast resistors for the laser head. Measure
the resistance between the fat and thin red wires.

I'd be happy to check out the lasers and blocks for you.

--- sam | Sci.Electronics.Repair FAQ Mirror: http://repairfaq.ece.drexel.edu/
Repair | Main Table of Contents: http://repairfaq.ece.drexel.edu/REPAIR/
+Lasers | Sam's Laser FAQ: http://repairfaq.ece.drexel.edu/sam/lasersam.htm
| Mirror Sites: http://repairfaq.ece.drexel.edu/REPAIR/F_mirror.html

Note: These links are hopefully temporary until we can sort out the excessive
traffic on Repairfaq.org.

Important: Anything sent to the email address in the message header above is
ignored unless my full name is included in the subject line. Or, you can
contact me via the Feedback Form in the FAQs.
 
[This followup was posted to sci.electronics.repair and a copy was sent
to the cited author.]

In article <1114894601.588842.251700@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
ckozicki@snet.net says...
So I opened it, and there were a series of screens for calibrating
Contrast, Color, Sharp, and so on. Then there are two screens, each
with concentric rectangles about an inch from the edge of the screen -
one for oldie "4:3" viewers like me, and one for HD 16:9ers. Each has
a circle in the center, about 8 inches in diameter on a 24" diagonal
NTSC screen.

When I displayed it on my Toshiba 24af43 flat and the Sony 24" flat
WEGA, I was shocked by how bowed out and overscanned both sets were. I
cracked the internal menus on each set, and brought those rectangles
back on to the screens(!) let alone properly sizing them to achieve a
height and width ratio of 4:3, or, 1.33333333~ This certainly involved
a lot of "trapezoidal" and "pincushion" adjustments to get it right,
but once I did, it looked as ruler straight as I could get it.

Now here is the weird part: The concentric squares, one one inch
inside the other, were perfectly square, as measured diagonally and
vertical/horiz. The circle was perfectly round - I have a protractor
to check these things. And, everything was equally distant on all
sides. BUT: when I switch to broadcast TV - IE the Weather Channel
forecasts or other channels that use a lot of frames and boxes, the
main box may be off center, and on other channels the boxes would
appear pincushioned(some cases in or out) or even parallelogram shaped!

So I performed the secret menus adjustments according to THOSE images,
and went back to THX - Now the THX images were once again out of whack,
even worse than before.

I now have reached a compromise between the Star Wars THX calibrations
and broadcast TV - slightly out of whack between the two.

And no - neither set has geometry adjustments PER input. After all,
these are "smaller" 24" sets, not 27" or larger that probably do have
internal geometry for each input. So anyone reading this - PLEASE don't
suggest checking for adjustments for each input.

Anybody have any clues? Is it something the cable or broadcast channels
are doing to the signal? Or are both DVD players or the THX test
patterns themselves to blame?
For the Sony, you can also check the forums at www.agoraqest.com.

I assume on the Sony you made your adjustments in the DEF group? Be
aware that there may also be a 16:9 group, which would be active if the
DVD is sending an anamorphic signal. This section includes some geometry
settings of it's own. If the TV cannot override the anamorphic mode, you
may need to temporarily set your DVD player to letterbox mode and make
adjustments under DEF, then set to widescreen/anamorphic/16:9 and and
make adjustments under 16:9.

I would still consider getting Avia and/or DVE (Digital Video
Essentials.) They contain nice instructions on how to perform settings,
MANY more patterns, filters for setting tint/color if you don't want to
mess with turning guns on and off, and extensive audio adjustments.

Also, especially with the 24" Sony, too much brightness could overload
the TV's power supply, causing bowing and other issues. Both DVD's have
needle pulse patterns designed to help find your maximum white level
(Contrast or Picture) that the TV can properly handle.

--
If there is a no_junk in my address, please REMOVE it before replying!
All junk mail senders will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the
law!!
http://home.att.net/~andyross
 
What are you talikg about ?

"AliTonto" <alitonto@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:6655e407.0505010446.59d0c028@posting.google.com...
How do I go back to the way my page looked before Beta version came in
force;
I find this to be so tiring at reading lots of threads in this Beta style.
Anybodyelse feels the same?
Cheers.
 
According to circuit breaker tripping curves, a c.b does not trip with the
nominal current, but with 50% more current than nominal in 2 hours.Thus,
15+7.5=22.5 A and that for 2 hours.

--
Tzortzakakis Dimitrios
major in electrical engineering, freelance electrician
FH von Iraklion-Kreta, freiberuflicher Elektriker
dimtzort AT otenet DOT gr
Ď "Jerry G." <jerryg50@hotmail.com> Ýăńářĺ óôď ěŢíőěá
news:3a8utoF626r1cU4@uni-berlin.de...
I am thinking that your meter is being effected by some harmonics. I have
seen this before. If your circuit breaker for the outlet is a 15 Amp
rated,
it would be in a short time that it should become opened.

The inverter ovens are using switching power supply technology. The
current
pull from these under load is difficult to accurately measure. If the oven
seem to be working okay, I would think it is okay.

--

Jerry G.
======


dude17@sacbeemail.com> wrote in message
news:1111415748.421818.304320@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
X-No-Archive: Yes

I have one of those "inverter" type microwave oven made by
Panasonic. It uses an inverter instead of the traditional iron core
transformer to power the magnetron.

I just noticed that this thing draws a lot more power & current than it
should. The manual specifies "120V AC 12.7A, 1460W" and 1,300W cooking
power.

Measurement with either true RMS or regular ammeter shows actual
current draw is around 16A. Based on the specifications given, the
power factor comes to around 0.956. Given that, it probably has a
harmonics correction so the reading from even an ordinary ammeter
should be reasonably accurate.

One possibility is that the interference from the inverter is causing
the meter to read abnormally high but given rather unrealistic
specifications, I believe my result is reasonable.

It is rather unrealistic that the calculated system efficinecy is
89%(1300W output over 1460W input). 89% efficinecy is unrealistically
high when you factor in the loss in drive circuit and magnetron. More
realistic answer is: A.) the unit is drawing more than the rated power.
B.)the unit is putting out less than the rating C.) combination of
both.

Assuming my measurement is correct, what's the permissibility of
something with NEMA-15P plug drawing in excess of 15A for more than a
split second?

If you have an inveter microwave oven, I'd like to know how your unit's
current draw compares to the official specification.
 
"AliTonto" <alitonto@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:6655e407.0505010446.59d0c028@posting.google.com...
How do I go back to the way my page looked before Beta version came in force;
I find this to be so tiring at reading lots of threads in this Beta style.
Anybodyelse feels the same?
Cheers.
Yes. Use the UK (original) version:
http://www.google.co.uk/advanced_group_search?hl=en
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top