The proper way to post to a group

[DarkMatter]

On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 04:00:37 GMT, "Ross Mac"
<macroeng@example.invalid> Gave us:

I guess it is time to repost DarkMatters favorite tune.....

Leave it to a retarded troll to post baby bullshit in usenet.

You are that retarded troll. Sad, you are.

 

[DarkMatter]

On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 02:01:42 GMT, "John Fortier"
<jfortier@rochester.rr.com> Gave us:

Top posting on this one, for the previously stated reason that it's a heap
of old monkey dung.

Yes, your posts are exactly that. Heaps of monkey dung.

YOU are a heap of kaka as well, boy. Your steamin' heap is so
strong, you probably get checks from your neighbors for clearing their
driveways of snow. Then you get a bill for the steamin' heap you
leave behind. Yes, you are that usenet retard from Rochester.

 

[DarkMatter]

On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 02:01:42 GMT, "John Fortier"
<jfortier@rochester.rr.com> Gave us:

Come on guys, darkmatter may be amusing in his own moronic little way, but
the best way to treat spoiled children is to ignore them. Just don't answer
him. Pretend he doesn't exist. Eventually, if he can't get a rise out of
anyone, he'll go off in a sulk.

Said the wussy boy, troll retard. I'll bet that you answer every
fucking post you read, before you hit this one, jackoff!

 

[DarkMatter]

On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 02:01:42 GMT, "John Fortier"
<jfortier@rochester.rr.com> Gave us:

Still working on the lightly moderated group, so if you want a universe
without dark matter, feel free to join in.

You wouldn't know what a moderated group was if one bit you in the
ass.

Guess what, retard boy. Nobody will post in your group, myself or
otherwise. So have fun professing your usenet retardedness all
around. You have been doing a fine job so far. Just ask anybody that
actually DOES know something about usenet. You be 'tard, boy.

 

[DarkMatter]

On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 22:04:52 -0400, Keith R. Williams
<krw@attglobal.net> Gave us:

Nope. He *claims* he's an engineer. He may have eluded to
having earned some degree, but he has never claimed that he has
an *engineering* degree. You must learn to read what such liars
actually say, rather than following the deflections.

Fuck you! I didn't lie. I am a degreed engineer. EE, fuckhead!

So take a flying leap off a tall bridge, you worthless, lying
bastard.

 

[DarkMatter]

On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 22:04:52 -0400, Keith R. Williams
<krw@attglobal.net> Gave us:

Well, I've been a practicing engineer for 30ish years and
couldn't answer your question. I don't do such stuff.
Electrical engineering is a big field and one cannot be expected
to pass a random Internet test.

Damn, the total idiot said something right. Was it an accident?
Let's analyze...

You are right. You PRACTICED at being an engineer.

You are right. You don't do such stuff!

You are right. Electrical engineering is a "big field."
Just not one that you are up on.

The fact is, the little bastard doesn't even come close to me on
motion control, and it is NOT my mainstay in the field. It just
happens to be ONE solution that we provided a customer with.

It ain't some lame table bed motion system for a fucking vertical
mill, like Johnny wafted off at the mouth about. When I mentioned my
system, all the little wussy bastard could do is start trolling, and
he hasn't stopped since. Lately, he claims that I "found it" on
Google. More bullshit. I can describe the system intimately, as I
was on the design team that developed it, as well as the crew that
tested and calibrated the units to their respective tool heads.

Not only is he a whacked troll fuck that can't handle it when he has
been bested, you are as well.

 

[Michael Black]

"Michael A. Terrell" (mike.terrell@earthlink.net) writes:

John Fortier wrote:

I liked the Beverly Hillbillies alternative words, the only trouble is, now
I can't get get the tune out of my head and for some reason I keep trying to
remember the name of the girl who played the daughter!

John

That's easy. She is Donna Douglas, and the Beverly Hillbillies theme
music was written and performed by Lester Flatt and Earl Scruggs.

Actually, no. Earl Scruggs was on Fresh Air this week, and he was

asked about this. He said something to suggest they had less
to do with the song than is expected, though I was not paying full
attention.

A quick search for the song provides the information that "The Ballad
of Jed Clampett" was written by Paul Henning, both the lyrics and
music. He was of course, the creator of the show.

The booklet that comes with Flatt & Scruggs "The Complete Mercury Sessions"
CD mentions how they had a "huge country hit with their version of
'The Ballad of Jed Clampett' (which Lester, despite legend, did not
sing on the show's theme)".

So they didn't sing the theme. They didn't write the song, or the lyrics.
And it's not even clear if their version was used in the show (though,
if I'd been paying attention to the interview, I would have got
the full bit about why they did record the song).

Michael

 

[John Larkin]

On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 20:49:18 -0700, DarkMatter
<DarkMatter@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:

On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 19:05:38 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highlandSNIPtechTHISnologyPLEASE.com> Gave us:

On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 21:30:24 -0400, Keith R. Williams
krw@attglobal.net> wrote:


I thought his insistence that a 100W light bulb gave out less
heat than a 100w heater was pretty funny.

That is not what I said, retard boy. What I said was that I could
heat a room better with a 100 watt heating element than a 100 watt
light bulb can or does. Your inability to grasp my position on the
matter is the sole reason that you are considered a blathering retard.

...or his insistence
that UV/X-rays cannot heat. Hell, he's been plenty funny!

I never said that. I said that what a 100 watt light bulb emits
does not heat walls at a distance, which your lame ass distorted into
some other troll baby bullshit, as usual.


Oh yeah, and his statement that all PC keyboards are Hall effect. That
was pretty funny.

As if you know a fucking thing about keyboards, or hall effect
switches without looking it up.


John, the retard.

Yes, that you are.

You're not "pretty funny", you are downright stupid to the point of
it being humorous. Now *that* IS funny.

Hey, that's a neat trick, negative snipping. I guess Hall effect
keyboards can do that.

John

 

[Michael A. Terrell]

Michael Black wrote:

"Michael A. Terrell" (mike.terrell@earthlink.net) writes:
John Fortier wrote:

I liked the Beverly Hillbillies alternative words, the only trouble is, now
I can't get get the tune out of my head and for some reason I keep trying to
remember the name of the girl who played the daughter!

John

That's easy. She is Donna Douglas, and the Beverly Hillbillies theme
music was written and performed by Lester Flatt and Earl Scruggs.

Actually, no. Earl Scruggs was on Fresh Air this week, and he was
asked about this. He said something to suggest they had less
to do with the song than is expected, though I was not paying full
attention.

A quick search for the song provides the information that "The Ballad
of Jed Clampett" was written by Paul Henning, both the lyrics and
music. He was of course, the creator of the show.

You're right about Paul Henning.

The booklet that comes with Flatt & Scruggs "The Complete Mercury Sessions"
CD mentions how they had a "huge country hit with their version of
'The Ballad of Jed Clampett' (which Lester, despite legend, did not
sing on the show's theme)".

I have that CD, and I finally found that. I wish the would use larger
print.

So they didn't sing the theme. They didn't write the song, or the lyrics.
And it's not even clear if their version was used in the show (though,
if I'd been paying attention to the interview, I would have got
the full bit about why they did record the song).

Michael

I have a CD "Flatt & Scruggs on Foggy Mountain" that has "The ballad
of Jed Clampett" and it list P. Henning, and it runs 2:03

WSM has been playing it fairly often, and has attributed it to them.
They were early morning DJs on WSM in the early '60s, as well as
performing on the Grand Ole Opry.
--


Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida

 

[DarkMatter]

On 18 Oct 2003 04:23:56 GMT, et472@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Michael Black)
Gave us:

Actually, no. Earl Scruggs was on Fresh Air this week, and he was
asked about this. He said something to suggest they had less
to do with the song than is expected, though I was not paying full
attention.

A quick search for the song provides the information that "The Ballad
of Jed Clampett" was written by Paul Henning, both the lyrics and
music. He was of course, the creator of the show.

The booklet that comes with Flatt & Scruggs "The Complete Mercury Sessions"
CD mentions how they had a "huge country hit with their version of
'The Ballad of Jed Clampett' (which Lester, despite legend, did not
sing on the show's theme)".

So they didn't sing the theme. They didn't write the song, or the lyrics.
And it's not even clear if their version was used in the show (though,
if I'd been paying attention to the interview, I would have got
the full bit about why they did record the song).

Michael

Then that retarded usenet poster "MacRetard" had to go and befoul
usenet with his baby troll bullshit.

Thanks for the CORRECT trivia.

 

[John Fields]

On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 02:01:42 GMT, "John Fortier"
<jfortier@rochester.rr.com> wrote:

Top posting on this one, for the previously stated reason that it's a heap
of old monkey dung.

Come on guys, darkmatter may be amusing in his own moronic little way, but
the best way to treat spoiled children is to ignore them.

---
Spoiled children who aren't dealt with often often evolve with a
disproportionate sense of importance and turn into bullies.
---

Just don't answer
him. Pretend he doesn't exist.

---
The Ostrich response?
---

Eventually, if he can't get a rise out of
anyone, he'll go off in a sulk. Probably to bug the folks at
alt.anal.bandits!

---
By posting that slur, even though it's not _to_ DM, you know he'll read
it and probably respond. Sounds to me like a sneaky way of getting into
the fray while pretentending to distance yourself from it.
---

Still working on the lightly moderated group, so if you want a universe
without dark matter, feel free to join in.

---
The belief in the existence of dark matter is a fallacy.

Suppose for a moment that our local universe is merely a bubble
surrounded by an infinite expanse of infinitely dense, infinitely
energetic Universe. For want of a better analogy, a void in a block of
Swiss cheese. When our universe was formed and the void appeared, some
of the material from the Universe outgassed into the void and eventually
became the matter from which everything in our universe is composed.

However, since the beginning of the formation of the void, the
gravitational force of the Universe has been attracting matter back to
itself. Because of the inverse square law on our side of the void wall,
the closer the matter gets to the void's wall the more it is attracted,
the greater its velocity will become, and the greater the red shift the
farther out we look. If the velocity becomes luminal, then its mass
becomes infinite, leaves our local universe and rejoins the infinite
Universe.

So, if this conjecture is true it would explain the reason for the
increasing red shift with distance, the discrepancy between how much
matter should be here and how much there appears to be, (obviating the
need for the existence of dark matter) and the reason for the horizon of
the universe.

It would also settle the question of whether our local universe is open
or closed. Interestingly, it would also bring up the question of
whether or not the Swiss cheese was really a black hole in which we were
embedded!
---

I liked the Beverly Hillbillies alternative words, the only trouble is, now
I can't get get the tune out of my head and for some reason I keep trying to
remember the name of the girl who played the daughter!

---
Elly May Clampett / Donna Douglas

http://www.pcperspectives.com/hillbillies/




--
John Fields

 

[John Fields]

On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 02:01:42 GMT, "John Fortier"
<jfortier@rochester.rr.com> wrote:

PS darkmatter, don't bother replying, I'll ignore you and you won't ever
know if you have managed to annoy me.

---
Can you say "hypocrite"?

If you're going to ignore someone (and you mean it) you can't write to
them to let them know that you're ignoring them!^)

--
John Fields

 

[John Fields]

On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 22:04:52 -0400, Keith R. Williams
<krw@attglobal.net> wrote:

In article <FPJjb.4373$Ec1.381562@bgtnsc05-
news.ops.worldnet.att.net>, macroeng@example.invalid says...

He claims he has a degree...

Nope. He *claims* he's an engineer. He may have eluded to
^^^^^^

alluded?

having earned some degree, but he has never claimed that he has
an *engineering* degree. You must learn to read what such liars
actually say, rather than following the deflections.

just ask him a question like I did...he will
send you some crap he got off of google...but will never answer a technical
question....I did this over on sci.electronics.repair ....just more
rhetoric.....

Well, I've been a practicing engineer for 30ish years and
couldn't answer your question. I don't do such stuff.
Electrical engineering is a big field and one cannot be expected
to pass a random Internet test.

I guess it is time to repost DarkMatters favorite tune.....

Mildly amusing. It pissed off DimBulb, so I'll give you three
stars (more may be awarded based on further DimBulb tirades ;-).

snip

--
John Fields

 

[John Fields]

On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 19:22:50 -0700, DarkMatter
<DarkMatter@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:

On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 15:00:55 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highSNIPlandTHIStechPLEASEnology.com> Gave us:

Yucch: what a nasty little life you must inhabit.

Cheers,


It takes a true retard to spew this baby bullshit, then finish with
"Cheers"

You are so fucking stupid, you make stupid people look like
geniuses.

---
You've gotta be pretty smart to make a stupid person look like a genius,
but it would take a genius to make you look smart.

--
John Fields

 

[John Fields]

On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 20:49:18 -0700, DarkMatter
<DarkMatter@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:

I never said that. I said that what a 100 watt light bulb emits
does not heat walls at a distance, which your lame ass distorted into
some other troll baby bullshit, as usual.

---
In addition to visible light, a 100 watt incandescent lamp emits
infrared radiation which, when absorbed by distant objects, will cause
the objects to become heated.

--
John Fields

 

[Keith R. Williams]

In article <vdg2pvgfnurkas4124bsc4ecsd8v6j07t9@4ax.com>,
jfields@austininstruments.com says...

On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 22:04:52 -0400, Keith R. Williams
krw@attglobal.net> wrote:

In article <FPJjb.4373$Ec1.381562@bgtnsc05-
news.ops.worldnet.att.net>, macroeng@example.invalid says...

He claims he has a degree...

Nope. He *claims* he's an engineer. He may have eluded to
^^^^^^
alluded?

Damned spiel checkers!

--
Keith

 

[DarkMatter]

On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 11:21:35 -0400, Keith R. Williams
<krw@attglobal.net> Gave us:

In article <vdg2pvgfnurkas4124bsc4ecsd8v6j07t9@4ax.com>,
jfields@austininstruments.com says...
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 22:04:52 -0400, Keith R. Williams
krw@attglobal.net> wrote:

In article <FPJjb.4373$Ec1.381562@bgtnsc05-
news.ops.worldnet.att.net>, macroeng@example.invalid says...

He claims he has a degree...

Nope. He *claims* he's an engineer. He may have eluded to
^^^^^^
alluded?

Damned spiel checkers!

Sure.

 

[Ross Mac]

TardMatter has no life, no future and no education...his sole quest in life
is to flame the newsgroups...he claims to be and engineer..but so far...he
is a google poster....Just give him a problem...he will never answer!
Loosen your rubber helmet Tard boy!


"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:t2g2pvs7s2db1r09r9b7vafu237amfskou@4ax.com...

On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 02:01:42 GMT, "John Fortier"
jfortier@rochester.rr.com> wrote:


PS darkmatter, don't bother replying, I'll ignore you and you won't ever
know if you have managed to annoy me.

---
Can you say "hypocrite"?

If you're going to ignore someone (and you mean it) you can't write to
them to let them know that you're ignoring them!^)

--
John Fields

 

[John Fortier]

"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:1qd2pv8n04laa6hm5rphg4h9pa6pnabtli@4ax.com...

On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 02:01:42 GMT, "John Fortier"
jfortier@rochester.rr.com> wrote:

Snip of not very interesting stuff

The belief in the existence of dark matter is a fallacy.

Suppose for a moment that our local universe is merely a bubble
surrounded by an infinite expanse of infinitely dense, infinitely
energetic Universe. For want of a better analogy, a void in a block of
Swiss cheese. When our universe was formed and the void appeared, some
of the material from the Universe outgassed into the void and eventually
became the matter from which everything in our universe is composed.

However, since the beginning of the formation of the void, the
gravitational force of the Universe has been attracting matter back to
itself. Because of the inverse square law on our side of the void wall,
the closer the matter gets to the void's wall the more it is attracted,
the greater its velocity will become, and the greater the red shift the
farther out we look. If the velocity becomes luminal, then its mass
becomes infinite, leaves our local universe and rejoins the infinite
Universe.

So, if this conjecture is true it would explain the reason for the
increasing red shift with distance, the discrepancy between how much
matter should be here and how much there appears to be, (obviating the
need for the existence of dark matter) and the reason for the horizon of
the universe.

It would also settle the question of whether our local universe is open
or closed. Interestingly, it would also bring up the question of
whether or not the Swiss cheese was really a black hole in which we were
embedded!
--- Beverly Hillbillies snip
John Fields

Very interesting theory. However: assuming that the hole in the "Swiss
Cheese" is spherical, and that the density of the surrounding "cheese" is
constant, which seems reasonable from the relatively constant amplitued of
the microwave background radiation, it has been demonstrated, frequently,
that the gravitational effects within such a spherical chamber are zero. In
other words the attraction of the surrounding grativy generating medium
actually cancels at any point in the surrounded sphere.

It follows from this that the atttraction of the surrounding denser medium
will have no effect on the surrounded volume, while the spherical "bubble"
exists. Therefore, matter and energy near the boundary of the "hole" will
not be affected by the presence of the surrounding denser medium more than
matter close to the center. There is no net gravitational effect which will
accelerate the matter within our universe toward the surrounding denser
medium. So, should such a super dense surrounding medium exist, it will not
explain the expanding local universe.

A second objection to your theory is the obvious one of asking why such
bubbles should occur in the first place, and, if they should form, what
prevents the surrounding medium from collapsing back onto them. While the
gravitational effects on a surrounded sphere may be zero, the self
attraction of the surrounding medium is not zero and the enclosure will tend
to close, quite rapidly. Why then does our universe continue to exist?

Third, if the surrounding medium exists, why is all we see from the edge of
the universe the cosmic microwave background radiation? The argument that
the radiation from the surrounding medium is redshifted to microwave
frequencies by the gravitational effects of the surreounding medium does not
hold water for the reasons explained above. If the surrounding superdense
medium exists, we should be able to see the radiation from the inner surface
of the bubble. In fact the whole universe should be so awash with radiation
at all frequencies that life as we know it would be impossible. I think I
might have noticed it, myself!

Fourth; for us to observe a equal universal expansion in all directions, we
would have to be close tothe exact centre of th surrounded sphere. This
souds just a little coincidental to be likely, anthropic principle aside..

I'm sorry, John, but I cannot subscribe to your theory. There are too many
holes in it, and the pun is entirely intended!

However, there is every probability that our universe, viewed as a whole, is
the contents of a all encompassing black hole.

Actually, this seems to be a suitable subject for a whole new thread, but
probably not in the present news group. Do you know of a suitable group
where we could start such a thread and continue it without interfering with
the main purpose of the host group? A few opinions apart from ours on this
subject would add flavour tothe stew of contention.

It appears that dark matter may exist, although the case is as yet unproven.
However, darkmatter, unfortunately, does exist.

I have to ask you, John, how much time and effort have you wasted dealing
with darkmatter and his ilk and whether or not you would prefer to post to a
group where you could speak your mind openly without having to put up with
darkmatter's purile excresences and the similar eminations of those like
him.

Regards

John

 

[John Fortier]

"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:t2g2pvs7s2db1r09r9b7vafu237amfskou@4ax.com...

On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 02:01:42 GMT, "John Fortier"
jfortier@rochester.rr.com> wrote:


PS darkmatter, don't bother replying, I'll ignore you and you won't ever
know if you have managed to annoy me.

---
Can you say "hypocrite"?

If you're going to ignore someone (and you mean it) you can't write to
them to let them know that you're ignoring them!^)

--
John Fields

Why not? I already did. The ignoring is in affect from the time of posting
the message.

Try it, It's actually very satisfying!

John Fortier