PRC as a amplifier in GPS question.

Thanks, you've been most helpful

DaveC


"Alex Gibson" <me@privacy.net> wrote in
news:2j1ruoFs6reeU1@uni-berlin.de:

"DaveC" <bobason456@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns95048FAE52257ohirohotmailcom@203.96.16.33...
Hello.. well my on going project to write a TCP/IP stack on a pic
is
still
"on going" and with the holodays here I'm going to get a good chunk
of
it
out of the way.

I'm still using slip to connect it to my PC, but recently I'v come
to realize how much simpler life would be if I used 10baseT
Ethernet.
Basicaly
because the chips that deal with this have more memory for packets
then
the
pic does !

Any way. I have searched around and found this one

http://www.embeddedethernet.com/

But the price of US$80 is a bit off-putting, seeing as I can pick
up a complete PCI card from DickSmith (AKA RadioShack) for $10-15
nowdays.

I've found others that use old ISA NIC's but I'd rather use
something
else.

So does any one know of other solutions, for embedded mcus that
dont
cost
so much?

I know, I know, TCP/IP done a thousand times before on a PIC. but
I'm
doing
it to learn, not to be new.

Thanks
DaveC

cheap option as others have said is an isa ethernet card

http://www.ethernut.de/en/isa/index.html

get one from one of the weekend computer markets.
50c - $5 for an isa card, for $5 should be able to pic up a few.
Make sure to check what the chip is.

http://hyper.sunjapan.com.cn/~hz/PIC/index.html look at picnic
http://hyper.sunjapan.com.cn/~hz/PIC/picnic/hardware.html

For quick option www.edtp.com
packet whacker , nicholas or nicki board

Have a look at http://www.lvr.com/

Also enter the Zilog design comp and select one of the ethernet
modules. If they have any left.
http://www.jandspromotions.com/zilog2004/

Alex
 
<SNIP>

"How ANYONE Can Replace Leaking Capacitors"
http://www.overclockers.com/tips1081/

The biggest problem I can see with his methodology is the amount of heat
that will be applied to the board and components from the very slow one
leg at a time removal of the capacitors. Soldering takes place at a
temperature of around 300 degrees C. Often electronic components are
rated to withstand this temperature for only 10 seconds at a time.
Excessive heat will also cause the tracks on the board to lift. On some
boards the tracks are very close together so a tyro could easily bridge
some solder across two or three tracks accidentally.

By fitting second hand componets there is an increased risk of these
failing later and having to be replaced again.

Most motherboards these days have multiple layer traces meaning there is
a risk of damaging the through plating in the component holes where the
internal traces join to it. This is unrepairable.

Any leaked electrolyte should be cleaned off the board before installing
new caps. NOT using screwdrivers as he used them - using the correct
equipment to avoid damaging the board.
The biggest problem I can see is the the guy is using a big soldering iron,
the tip looks like a chisel tip, which is no good for fine electronic work.
You are very likely to rip up tracks and thru hold plating with that
monster. Also his method of removal was to wiggle the caps out one leg at a
time which again can easily stuff the board. And last but not least it
sounds like the guy ended up with a dry joint since he describes one of the
caps as being a bit loose but not able fall out. I wonder how much longer
that motherboard worked for......

To the original poster -
As others have said if you have no experience of fine electronic soldering
then best to leave it to a pro.

Cheers
Vaughan
 
Hi John
The is part of an alarm clock radio Superstar Model and the board
description is PB1001-H(Rev.3)
I can identify the vertical chip AN5151N. If this is a possible
suspect, could anyone give me the pinouts please.
Thank you.
AT




"john" <va3mmTAKEOUTTHIS@niagara.com> wrote in message news:<newscache$pjb9zh$vpj$1@newsfeed.niagara.com>...
Try the scan circuits...If we had the Make and Model
we could be more helpful.

kip

--
"Watch the return E-Mail addy its false"
"AliTonto" <alitonto@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:6655e407.0406130828.55ebe544@posting.google.com...
I have this tv that has parallel horizontal white lines that cover the
whole screen; they are spaced apart for most of the screen but get
closer together up the top. I have replaced electrolytics in vertical
section but no change.
Whatelse could be causing this problem?
Any info will be helpful.
Thank you.
 
Re: siemens gigaset 2415 2400 2420 2402 system pin code

press *65# as system pin code to access secret menu to reset factory
setting

hope these help!
 
Vogan wrote:
SNIP

"How ANYONE Can Replace Leaking Capacitors"
http://www.overclockers.com/tips1081/

The biggest problem I can see with his methodology is the amount of
heat that will be applied to the board and components from the very
slow one leg at a time removal of the capacitors. Soldering takes
place at a temperature of around 300 degrees C. Often electronic
components are rated to withstand this temperature for only 10
seconds at a time. Excessive heat will also cause the tracks on the
board to lift. On some boards the tracks are very close together so
a tyro could easily bridge some solder across two or three tracks
accidentally.

By fitting second hand componets there is an increased risk of these
failing later and having to be replaced again.

Most motherboards these days have multiple layer traces meaning
there is a risk of damaging the through plating in the component
holes where the internal traces join to it. This is unrepairable.

Any leaked electrolyte should be cleaned off the board before
installing new caps. NOT using screwdrivers as he used them - using
the correct equipment to avoid damaging the board.



The biggest problem I can see is the the guy is using a big soldering
iron, the tip looks like a chisel tip, which is no good for fine
electronic work. You are very likely to rip up tracks and thru hold
plating with that monster. Also his method of removal was to wiggle
the caps out one leg at a time which again can easily stuff the
board. And last but not least it sounds like the guy ended up with a
dry joint since he describes one of the caps as being a bit loose but
not able fall out. I wonder how much longer that motherboard worked
for......

To the original poster -
As others have said if you have no experience of fine electronic
soldering then best to leave it to a pro.
I just replaced 10 capacitors in a board I really didn't want to retire
today. This thread prompted me to give it a go, it's been sitting on my
shelf for a few months. I spoke to a mate who's been tinkering with
electronics and has owned a soldering iron since he was 10. He said "Why
not?" The board would start to boot and then die after about 20-30 seconds.
Ten caps were bulging, none leaking. I replaced them all with caps taken off
other boards. Some weren't quite the same specs, I used 1000uf 6.3v in some
places instead of 10v ones that I removed. Me mate reckons that, PCs only
having 12, 5 and 3.3 volt rails, they were obviously not being used on the
12v rail and the spec on the cap is the max it can handle so the 6.3v ones
should be fine. Three of the caps I replaced were really close together and
the ones I used to replace them were larger diameter so I could only fit the
middle one flush with the mobo, the other two, on each side, are soldered to
short 'legs' I soldered through the holes and are almost laying on their
sides. I used big caps here as the ones I removed were big (just not *as*
big) and they are situated right between the ATX power connector and the row
of smaller caps by the CPU socket.

I used the cheapest soldering iron from Dick Smith's, it came with a chisel
tip and a pointed tip, I used the pointed tip. Cost about $20 last year.

I finished the project an hour ago, just had a coffee. Took me most of the
day from unsoldering caps from other boards to putting the covers on the
case and downloading the latest anti-virus defs. The board, an Abit
BX133-RAID, is now running a Celeron Coppermine 900Mhz at just over a Gig.
(112 FSB). It is rock-solid (touch wood), I've ran Prime95 error-free for a
couple of hours with it sitting on the table before fitting it in the case
and installing all my programs. I put a copper-based HSF on the CPU off a
Barton 2500+ and it's running at 32°C under full load. (Case 21°C). I also
put a heatsink and fan off a dead GeForce2 on the northbridge, just because
I had it and it's fittings lined up with holes in the mobo <shrug>. It's in
a full tower with a couple of fans, one in the bottom and one out by the
CPU. I really wanted to get that board going as it has the normal BX-based
board's ATA33 IDE channels plus a Promise controller with two ATA100
channels and RAID option. I have a few HDDs of around 10-20GB and wanted a
machine that could use them all for storage. Now I have it. I can fit up to
eight IDE devices. It's currently playing a Nirvana track, (My mp3
collection on random, hooked up to the stereo) and is housing the modem for
my home LAN. Just played a DivX on it, looks good.

So, yeah, we'll see how it goes in the longer term. I have high hopes for
it. It'll be running 24/7, also running SETI@home. The board is a
well-designed and built board, it just suffered from that wide-spread 'crap
capacitor' problem that was going around a while ago. (The board was made in
2000-2001) Most of the caps I soldered onto it today came off old P1 boards,
good quality caps.

Just thought I'd share.
--
~misfit~




---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.705 / Virus Database: 461 - Release Date: 12/06/2004
 
On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 22:58:29 +1200, "~misfit~"
<misfit61nz@yahoomung.co.nz> wrote:

Vogan wrote:
SNIP

"How ANYONE Can Replace Leaking Capacitors"
http://www.overclockers.com/tips1081/

The biggest problem I can see with his methodology is the amount of
heat that will be applied to the board and components from the very
slow one leg at a time removal of the capacitors. Soldering takes
place at a temperature of around 300 degrees C. Often electronic
components are rated to withstand this temperature for only 10
seconds at a time. Excessive heat will also cause the tracks on the
board to lift. On some boards the tracks are very close together so
a tyro could easily bridge some solder across two or three tracks
accidentally.

By fitting second hand componets there is an increased risk of these
failing later and having to be replaced again.

Most motherboards these days have multiple layer traces meaning
there is a risk of damaging the through plating in the component
holes where the internal traces join to it. This is unrepairable.

Any leaked electrolyte should be cleaned off the board before
installing new caps. NOT using screwdrivers as he used them - using
the correct equipment to avoid damaging the board.



The biggest problem I can see is the the guy is using a big soldering
iron, the tip looks like a chisel tip, which is no good for fine
electronic work. You are very likely to rip up tracks and thru hold
plating with that monster. Also his method of removal was to wiggle
the caps out one leg at a time which again can easily stuff the
board. And last but not least it sounds like the guy ended up with a
dry joint since he describes one of the caps as being a bit loose but
not able fall out. I wonder how much longer that motherboard worked
for......

To the original poster -
As others have said if you have no experience of fine electronic
soldering then best to leave it to a pro.

I just replaced 10 capacitors in a board I really didn't want to retire
today. This thread prompted me to give it a go, it's been sitting on my
shelf for a few months. I spoke to a mate who's been tinkering with
electronics and has owned a soldering iron since he was 10. He said "Why
not?" The board would start to boot and then die after about 20-30 seconds.
Ten caps were bulging, none leaking. I replaced them all with caps taken off
other boards. Some weren't quite the same specs, I used 1000uf 6.3v in some
places instead of 10v ones that I removed. Me mate reckons that, PCs only
having 12, 5 and 3.3 volt rails, they were obviously not being used on the
12v rail and the spec on the cap is the max it can handle so the 6.3v ones
should be fine. Three of the caps I replaced were really close together and
the ones I used to replace them were larger diameter so I could only fit the
middle one flush with the mobo, the other two, on each side, are soldered to
short 'legs' I soldered through the holes and are almost laying on their
sides. I used big caps here as the ones I removed were big (just not *as*
big) and they are situated right between the ATX power connector and the row
of smaller caps by the CPU socket.

I used the cheapest soldering iron from Dick Smith's, it came with a chisel
tip and a pointed tip, I used the pointed tip. Cost about $20 last year.

I finished the project an hour ago, just had a coffee. Took me most of the
day from unsoldering caps from other boards to putting the covers on the
case and downloading the latest anti-virus defs. The board, an Abit
BX133-RAID, is now running a Celeron Coppermine 900Mhz at just over a Gig.
(112 FSB). It is rock-solid (touch wood), I've ran Prime95 error-free for a
couple of hours with it sitting on the table before fitting it in the case
and installing all my programs. I put a copper-based HSF on the CPU off a
Barton 2500+ and it's running at 32°C under full load. (Case 21°C). I also
put a heatsink and fan off a dead GeForce2 on the northbridge, just because
I had it and it's fittings lined up with holes in the mobo <shrug>. It's in
a full tower with a couple of fans, one in the bottom and one out by the
CPU. I really wanted to get that board going as it has the normal BX-based
board's ATA33 IDE channels plus a Promise controller with two ATA100
channels and RAID option. I have a few HDDs of around 10-20GB and wanted a
machine that could use them all for storage. Now I have it. I can fit up to
eight IDE devices. It's currently playing a Nirvana track, (My mp3
collection on random, hooked up to the stereo) and is housing the modem for
my home LAN. Just played a DivX on it, looks good.

So, yeah, we'll see how it goes in the longer term. I have high hopes for
it. It'll be running 24/7, also running SETI@home. The board is a
well-designed and built board, it just suffered from that wide-spread 'crap
capacitor' problem that was going around a while ago. (The board was made in
2000-2001) Most of the caps I soldered onto it today came off old P1 boards,
good quality caps.

Just thought I'd share.
--
~misfit~

Hello misfit,
Good for you! I like to read a nice success story
especially from a chap willing to have a go.
I had a little success myself along similar lines recently also.
A weird fault in an old radio transceiver. When first switched
on, after being off for a day or so, it would crackle and pop
intermittently for about 5 minutes then come good. I could not
pin the source of the crackles and pops down to any one
area. Freezer spray didn't help me, so I checked every electro
and tantalum on the Tx/Rx board of this 20 year old codan
radio (HF4000). About 15 of the twenty or so tantalums
were leaky and about 4 of the 8 or so electros were leaky
also. I used new tantalums and second hand good electros
for the replacements.
The second hand electros were salvaged from junk boards
and were checked on a multimeter for leakage, a digital multi
meter that could check for capacitor value and Bob Parker's
little ESR meter, so I had no concerns about using the tested
second hand caps. They were definitely better than the leaky
ones that were in the radio. No more crackles and pops
when the radio is first switched on in the morning now. :)

Speaking of crackles and pops there used to be an instrument
called an "Ionisation Tester" Trimax (sp) made in Melbourne.
I remember using one decades ago to check high voltage capacitors.
This instrument had a micro ammeter, kilovolt meter and
a loudspeaker. The loudspeaker would roar with bad capacitors
or make the occasional pop with good capacitors.
Testing my suspect tantalum caps with a multimeter wasn't
really stretching them far voltage wise but I was lucky in this
instance in picking the dodgy caps.
I will have to have a play around sometime with a low voltage
supply, 0 to 35V, a micro ammeter and an audio amp just
like the high voltage ionisation tester to see if noisy caps
can be identified for sure. Nah! I am dreaming, too many
other things to do. :)

Thanks for sharing your story misfit.

Regards,
John Crighton
Sydney
 
John Crighton wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 22:58:29 +1200, "~misfit~"
misfit61nz@yahoomung.co.nz> wrote:

Vogan wrote:
To the original poster -
As others have said if you have no experience of fine electronic
soldering then best to leave it to a pro.

I just replaced 10 capacitors in a board I really didn't want to
retire today. This thread prompted me to give it a go, it's been
sitting on my shelf for a few months. I spoke to a mate who's been
tinkering with electronics and has owned a soldering iron since he
was 10. He said "Why not?" The board would start to boot and then
die after about 20-30 seconds. Ten caps were bulging, none leaking.
I replaced them all with caps taken off other boards. Some weren't
quite the same specs, I used 1000uf 6.3v in some places instead of
10v ones that I removed. Me mate reckons that, PCs only having 12, 5
and 3.3 volt rails, they were obviously not being used on the 12v
rail and the spec on the cap is the max it can handle so the 6.3v
ones should be fine. Three of the caps I replaced were really close
together and the ones I used to replace them were larger diameter so
I could only fit the middle one flush with the mobo, the other two,
on each side, are soldered to short 'legs' I soldered through the
holes and are almost laying on their sides. I used big caps here as
the ones I removed were big (just not *as* big) and they are
situated right between the ATX power connector and the row of
smaller caps by the CPU socket.

I used the cheapest soldering iron from Dick Smith's, it came with a
chisel tip and a pointed tip, I used the pointed tip. Cost about $20
last year.

I finished the project an hour ago, just had a coffee. Took me most
of the day from unsoldering caps from other boards to putting the
covers on the case and downloading the latest anti-virus defs. The
board, an Abit BX133-RAID, is now running a Celeron Coppermine
900Mhz at just over a Gig. (112 FSB). It is rock-solid (touch wood),
I've ran Prime95 error-free for a couple of hours with it sitting on
the table before fitting it in the case and installing all my
programs. I put a copper-based HSF on the CPU off a Barton 2500+ and
it's running at 32°C under full load. (Case 21°C). I also put a
heatsink and fan off a dead GeForce2 on the northbridge, just
because I had it and it's fittings lined up with holes in the mobo
shrug>. It's in a full tower with a couple of fans, one in the
bottom and one out by the CPU. I really wanted to get that board
going as it has the normal BX-based board's ATA33 IDE channels plus
a Promise controller with two ATA100 channels and RAID option. I
have a few HDDs of around 10-20GB and wanted a machine that could
use them all for storage. Now I have it. I can fit up to eight IDE
devices. It's currently playing a Nirvana track, (My mp3 collection
on random, hooked up to the stereo) and is housing the modem for my
home LAN. Just played a DivX on it, looks good.

So, yeah, we'll see how it goes in the longer term. I have high
hopes for it. It'll be running 24/7, also running SETI@home. The
board is a well-designed and built board, it just suffered from that
wide-spread 'crap capacitor' problem that was going around a while
ago. (The board was made in 2000-2001) Most of the caps I soldered
onto it today came off old P1 boards, good quality caps.

Just thought I'd share.
--
~misfit~

Hello misfit,
Good for you! I like to read a nice success story
especially from a chap willing to have a go.
I had a little success myself along similar lines recently also.
A weird fault in an old radio transceiver. When first switched
on, after being off for a day or so, it would crackle and pop
intermittently for about 5 minutes then come good. I could not
pin the source of the crackles and pops down to any one
area. Freezer spray didn't help me, so I checked every electro
and tantalum on the Tx/Rx board of this 20 year old codan
radio (HF4000). About 15 of the twenty or so tantalums
were leaky and about 4 of the 8 or so electros were leaky
also. I used new tantalums and second hand good electros
for the replacements.
The second hand electros were salvaged from junk boards
and were checked on a multimeter for leakage, a digital multi
meter that could check for capacitor value and Bob Parker's
little ESR meter, so I had no concerns about using the tested
second hand caps. They were definitely better than the leaky
ones that were in the radio. No more crackles and pops
when the radio is first switched on in the morning now. :)

Speaking of crackles and pops there used to be an instrument
called an "Ionisation Tester" Trimax (sp) made in Melbourne.
I remember using one decades ago to check high voltage capacitors.
This instrument had a micro ammeter, kilovolt meter and
a loudspeaker. The loudspeaker would roar with bad capacitors
or make the occasional pop with good capacitors.
Testing my suspect tantalum caps with a multimeter wasn't
really stretching them far voltage wise but I was lucky in this
instance in picking the dodgy caps.
I will have to have a play around sometime with a low voltage
supply, 0 to 35V, a micro ammeter and an audio amp just
like the high voltage ionisation tester to see if noisy caps
can be identified for sure. Nah! I am dreaming, too many
other things to do. :)

Thanks for sharing your story misfit.

Regards,
John Crighton
Sydney
Hi John. I'm posting from nz.tech, I know next-to-nothing about electronics
per-se, I *do* build (and trouble-shoot) computers for family and friends,
that's about my limit so far. Good to hear about your success with the
transceiver, I'm of the "fix it if possible" school, I hate the throw-away
values most people have today.

I'm embarrassed now, after reading your story I realised that a cheap
multi-meter I bought a few months ago for testing PC power supplies has a
capacitor-test function. I didn't even think about testing the caps I put in
the board, I just picked indentical values, eyeballed them and if they
looked good used them. <g>. Oh well, next time....

The PC has been running all night on 100% load and seems to be running
perfectly. I'm so happy. :)

Take care,
--
~misfit~


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.706 / Virus Database: 462 - Release Date: 14/06/2004
 
thay are retrace lines, nothing to do with
the vetical chip.

"AliTonto" <alitonto@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:6655e407.0406131624.110099c4@posting.google.com...
Hi John
The is part of an alarm clock radio Superstar Model and the board
description is PB1001-H(Rev.3)
I can identify the vertical chip AN5151N. If this is a possible
suspect, could anyone give me the pinouts please.
Thank you.
AT




"john" <va3mmTAKEOUTTHIS@niagara.com> wrote in message
news:<newscache$pjb9zh$vpj$1@newsfeed.niagara.com>...
Try the scan circuits...If we had the Make and Model
we could be more helpful.

kip

--
"Watch the return E-Mail addy its false"
"AliTonto" <alitonto@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:6655e407.0406130828.55ebe544@posting.google.com...
I have this tv that has parallel horizontal white lines that cover the
whole screen; they are spaced apart for most of the screen but get
closer together up the top. I have replaced electrolytics in vertical
section but no change.
Whatelse could be causing this problem?
Any info will be helpful.
Thank you.
 
I had similar symptoms with my TV. Turned out to be a cold solder on a diode
that was part of the power circuit. It used to display this screen just
before it cut out.

--
Please remove your shoes to reply
"Mr TUBEAMPS" <youfinedout@thomuusnonsence> wrote in message
news:40ce4bb8$0$11520$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
thay are retrace lines, nothing to do with
the vetical chip.

"AliTonto" <alitonto@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:6655e407.0406131624.110099c4@posting.google.com...
Hi John
The is part of an alarm clock radio Superstar Model and the board
description is PB1001-H(Rev.3)
I can identify the vertical chip AN5151N. If this is a possible
suspect, could anyone give me the pinouts please.
Thank you.
AT




"john" <va3mmTAKEOUTTHIS@niagara.com> wrote in message
news:<newscache$pjb9zh$vpj$1@newsfeed.niagara.com>...
Try the scan circuits...If we had the Make and Model
we could be more helpful.

kip

--
"Watch the return E-Mail addy its false"
"AliTonto" <alitonto@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:6655e407.0406130828.55ebe544@posting.google.com...
I have this tv that has parallel horizontal white lines that cover
the
whole screen; they are spaced apart for most of the screen but get
closer together up the top. I have replaced electrolytics in
vertical
section but no change.
Whatelse could be causing this problem?
Any info will be helpful.
Thank you.
 
In article <0Bqzc.2356$s52.82726@news.xtra.co.nz>,
misfit61nz@yahoomung.co.nz says...
John Crighton wrote:

Regards,
John Crighton
Sydney

Hi John. I'm posting from nz.tech, I know next-to-nothing about electronics
per-se, I *do* build (and trouble-shoot) computers for family and friends,
that's about my limit so far. Good to hear about your success with the
transceiver, I'm of the "fix it if possible" school, I hate the throw-away
values most people have today.
That is based on the fact that most products nowadays are manufactured
with a limited lifetime and parts are not available.

Also, in order to meet the expectations of consumers, many electronic
items are manufactured using miniaturised components (SMDs etc) that are
more difficult to remove and replace, or proprietary ICs etc.

Finally, it requires specialised knowledge, skills and equipment to
diagnose faults in modern electronic devices. Because of this the cost of
servicing is expensive and often more than the equipment is worth, so
they are not economic to repair.

The main driving factor in all of this is consumer demand for cheaper
gear, which I'm sure you agree with, or perhaps you would rather
computers still cost $8000 as the early IBM PCs did. The reason that the
Sinclair ZX80s and the like were so popular back then was that PC type
computers were so much more expensive than they are now. Most of the PCs
of the era were based on proprietary architectures.

I'm embarrassed now, after reading your story I realised that a cheap
multi-meter I bought a few months ago for testing PC power supplies has a
capacitor-test function. I didn't even think about testing the caps I put in
the board, I just picked indentical values, eyeballed them and if they
looked good used them. <g>. Oh well, next time....
Is that cheap multimeter repairable if it breaks? Will you spend the time
necessary to find the fault in it and repair it?
 
Patrick Dunford wrote:
In article <0Bqzc.2356$s52.82726@news.xtra.co.nz>,
misfit61nz@yahoomung.co.nz says...
John Crighton wrote:

Regards,
John Crighton
Sydney

Hi John. I'm posting from nz.tech, I know next-to-nothing about
electronics per-se, I *do* build (and trouble-shoot) computers for
family and friends, that's about my limit so far. Good to hear about
your success with the transceiver, I'm of the "fix it if possible"
school, I hate the throw-away values most people have today.

That is based on the fact that most products nowadays are manufactured
with a limited lifetime and parts are not available.

Also, in order to meet the expectations of consumers, many electronic
items are manufactured using miniaturised components (SMDs etc) that
are more difficult to remove and replace, or proprietary ICs etc.

Finally, it requires specialised knowledge, skills and equipment to
diagnose faults in modern electronic devices. Because of this the
cost of servicing is expensive and often more than the equipment is
worth, so they are not economic to repair.

The main driving factor in all of this is consumer demand for cheaper
gear, which I'm sure you agree with, or perhaps you would rather
computers still cost $8000 as the early IBM PCs did. The reason that
the Sinclair ZX80s and the like were so popular back then was that PC
type computers were so much more expensive than they are now. Most of
the PCs of the era were based on proprietary architectures.


I'm embarrassed now, after reading your story I realised that a cheap
multi-meter I bought a few months ago for testing PC power supplies
has a capacitor-test function. I didn't even think about testing the
caps I put in the board, I just picked indentical values, eyeballed
them and if they looked good used them. <g>. Oh well, next time....

Is that cheap multimeter repairable if it breaks? Will you spend the
time necessary to find the fault in it and repair it?
No, the multimeter was bought as a known throw-away if anything goes wrong
with it. Hell, even a new battery for it costs more than the meter cost.

The motherboard however is a different matter. It wasn't much more than a
year old when it failed, due to the infamous 'crap capacitor' problem that
hit the PC industry at the end of the last century/begining of this one. It
wasn't a 'cheapie' like the multimeter, in fact it was a top-of-the-range
board at the time.

BTW, it's now running a Tualatin Celeron 1300Mhz with an Upgradeware
adapter, overclocked to 1455Mhz.
--
~misfit~


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.706 / Virus Database: 462 - Release Date: 14/06/2004
 
"~misfit~" <misfit61nz@yahoomung.co.nz> wrote in message
news:HExzc.2529$s52.86339@news.xtra.co.nz...
Patrick Dunford wrote:
In article <0Bqzc.2356$s52.82726@news.xtra.co.nz>,
misfit61nz@yahoomung.co.nz says...
John Crighton wrote:
Good to hear about
your success with the transceiver, I'm of the "fix it if possible"
school, I hate the throw-away values most people have today.
Is that cheap multimeter repairable if it breaks? Will you spend the
time necessary to find the fault in it and repair it?
No, the multimeter was bought as a known throw-away if anything goes wrong
with it. Hell, even a new battery for it costs more than the meter cost.
I now have several Aus$12.00 meters from any one of a number of cheaps shops
or supercheap auto or dickies and use them regularly for all sorts of
measurements. I keep an eye out for when they are on special and add another
one or two at a time for the other car or toolbox.....

Every time that I have put the meter leads into a powerpoint to check the
voltage and find that I've been measuring current yesterday and forgot to
change the connection at the meter, well, you know that the meter winds up
looking like what the roadrunner leaves behind..... When the meter only cost
ten bucks, .....

And you should see my collection of soldering implements, from tiny little
small pin ic's up to tractor radiators!

Peter
 
"Patrick Dunford" <patrickdunford@nomail.invalid> wrote in message
news:MPG.1b394bf0abe0dbca989a86@news.paradise.net.nz...
In article <0Bqzc.2356$s52.82726@news.xtra.co.nz>,
misfit61nz@yahoomung.co.nz says...
John Crighton wrote:

Regards,
John Crighton
Sydney

Hi John. I'm posting from nz.tech, I know next-to-nothing about
electronics
per-se, I *do* build (and trouble-shoot) computers for family and
friends,
that's about my limit so far. Good to hear about your success with the
transceiver, I'm of the "fix it if possible" school, I hate the
throw-away
values most people have today.

That is based on the fact that most products nowadays are manufactured
with a limited lifetime and parts are not available.

Also, in order to meet the expectations of consumers, many electronic
items are manufactured using miniaturised components (SMDs etc) that are
more difficult to remove and replace, or proprietary ICs etc.

Finally, it requires specialised knowledge, skills and equipment to
diagnose faults in modern electronic devices. Because of this the cost of
servicing is expensive and often more than the equipment is worth, so
they are not economic to repair.

The main driving factor in all of this is consumer demand for cheaper
gear, which I'm sure you agree with, or perhaps you would rather
computers still cost $8000 as the early IBM PCs did. The reason that the
Sinclair ZX80s and the like were so popular back then was that PC type
computers were so much more expensive than they are now. Most of the PCs
of the era were based on proprietary architectures.


I'm embarrassed now, after reading your story I realised that a cheap
multi-meter I bought a few months ago for testing PC power supplies has
a
capacitor-test function. I didn't even think about testing the caps I
put in
the board, I just picked indentical values, eyeballed them and if they
looked good used them. <g>. Oh well, next time....

Is that cheap multimeter repairable if it breaks? Will you spend the time
necessary to find the fault in it and repair it?
I think you're misunderstanding the economics behind the cheap equipment
these days. What people want is something 'cheap'. Okay, not everyone, but
the vast majority, hence that rules. And it's pretty easy to do if you can
minimise component count and moving parts. Hence DVD players are sub-$100,
which I don't recall VCR's getting to. Recall when the original IBM PC's
were all TTL chips (what was it: 250-odd?)? Expensive. Then the VLSI chips
came out integrating functions into single chips, the price came down, etc.

SO....how do you repair a single chip device? Even if it has a few extra
bits here and there, chances are if it isn't a switch, a track or similar,
you can't repair it for less than a new device, on parts costs alone. If
it's for yourself, then fine, your time is worth nothing, but if it's for a
living, you've got a problem.

Ken
 
In article <2j943dFujln6U1@uni-berlin.de>, ken123@xtra.co.nz says...
"Patrick Dunford" <patrickdunford@nomail.invalid> wrote in message
news:MPG.1b394bf0abe0dbca989a86@news.paradise.net.nz...
In article <0Bqzc.2356$s52.82726@news.xtra.co.nz>,
misfit61nz@yahoomung.co.nz says...
John Crighton wrote:

Regards,
John Crighton
Sydney

Hi John. I'm posting from nz.tech, I know next-to-nothing about
electronics
per-se, I *do* build (and trouble-shoot) computers for family and
friends,
that's about my limit so far. Good to hear about your success with the
transceiver, I'm of the "fix it if possible" school, I hate the
throw-away
values most people have today.

That is based on the fact that most products nowadays are manufactured
with a limited lifetime and parts are not available.

Also, in order to meet the expectations of consumers, many electronic
items are manufactured using miniaturised components (SMDs etc) that are
more difficult to remove and replace, or proprietary ICs etc.

Finally, it requires specialised knowledge, skills and equipment to
diagnose faults in modern electronic devices. Because of this the cost of
servicing is expensive and often more than the equipment is worth, so
they are not economic to repair.

The main driving factor in all of this is consumer demand for cheaper
gear, which I'm sure you agree with, or perhaps you would rather
computers still cost $8000 as the early IBM PCs did. The reason that the
Sinclair ZX80s and the like were so popular back then was that PC type
computers were so much more expensive than they are now. Most of the PCs
of the era were based on proprietary architectures.


I'm embarrassed now, after reading your story I realised that a cheap
multi-meter I bought a few months ago for testing PC power supplies has
a
capacitor-test function. I didn't even think about testing the caps I
put in
the board, I just picked indentical values, eyeballed them and if they
looked good used them. <g>. Oh well, next time....

Is that cheap multimeter repairable if it breaks? Will you spend the time
necessary to find the fault in it and repair it?


I think you're misunderstanding the economics behind the cheap equipment
these days. What people want is something 'cheap'. Okay, not everyone, but
the vast majority, hence that rules. And it's pretty easy to do if you can
minimise component count and moving parts. Hence DVD players are sub-$100,
which I don't recall VCR's getting to. Recall when the original IBM PC's
were all TTL chips (what was it: 250-odd?)? Expensive. Then the VLSI chips
came out integrating functions into single chips, the price came down, etc.
DVD players are *occasionally* sub $100, and they achieve that by using
computer mechanisms for the most part. VCR prices have dropped to similar
levels to DVD players although it is rare to see them under $150.

The IBM PCs were repairable to an extent unheard of in the modern
computer, as were their predecessors. Ever heard of replacing a
northbridge or southbridge chip on a motherboard?

The economics have altered by making boards non-repairable, for example
by soldering chips into place instead of socketing as the early PCs had.
The cost of the original PC was not in the logic components, which were
cheap enough; it was from the proprietary architecture and the relatively
high costs of memory and peripherals, which were mostly made in the US at
the time.

Integrating logic into chipsets hasn't made a big difference to costs;
cutting overall production costs (by moving production to low wage
economies like China) has.

SO....how do you repair a single chip device? Even if it has a few extra
bits here and there, chances are if it isn't a switch, a track or similar,
you can't repair it for less than a new device, on parts costs alone. If
it's for yourself, then fine, your time is worth nothing, but if it's for a
living, you've got a problem.
 
"Patrick Dunford" <patrickdunford@nomail.invalid> wrote in message
news:MPG.1b3a898df3513f6a989aa2@news.paradise.net.nz...
In article <2j943dFujln6U1@uni-berlin.de>, ken123@xtra.co.nz says...
"Patrick Dunford" <patrickdunford@nomail.invalid> wrote in message
news:MPG.1b394bf0abe0dbca989a86@news.paradise.net.nz...
In article <0Bqzc.2356$s52.82726@news.xtra.co.nz>,
misfit61nz@yahoomung.co.nz says...
John Crighton wrote:

Regards,
John Crighton
Sydney

Hi John. I'm posting from nz.tech, I know next-to-nothing about
electronics
per-se, I *do* build (and trouble-shoot) computers for family and
friends,
that's about my limit so far. Good to hear about your success with
the
transceiver, I'm of the "fix it if possible" school, I hate the
throw-away
values most people have today.

That is based on the fact that most products nowadays are manufactured
with a limited lifetime and parts are not available.

Also, in order to meet the expectations of consumers, many electronic
items are manufactured using miniaturised components (SMDs etc) that
are
more difficult to remove and replace, or proprietary ICs etc.

Finally, it requires specialised knowledge, skills and equipment to
diagnose faults in modern electronic devices. Because of this the cost
of
servicing is expensive and often more than the equipment is worth, so
they are not economic to repair.

The main driving factor in all of this is consumer demand for cheaper
gear, which I'm sure you agree with, or perhaps you would rather
computers still cost $8000 as the early IBM PCs did. The reason that
the
Sinclair ZX80s and the like were so popular back then was that PC type
computers were so much more expensive than they are now. Most of the
PCs
of the era were based on proprietary architectures.


I'm embarrassed now, after reading your story I realised that a
cheap
multi-meter I bought a few months ago for testing PC power supplies
has
a
capacitor-test function. I didn't even think about testing the caps
I
put in
the board, I just picked indentical values, eyeballed them and if
they
looked good used them. <g>. Oh well, next time....

Is that cheap multimeter repairable if it breaks? Will you spend the
time
necessary to find the fault in it and repair it?


I think you're misunderstanding the economics behind the cheap equipment
these days. What people want is something 'cheap'. Okay, not everyone,
but
the vast majority, hence that rules. And it's pretty easy to do if you
can
minimise component count and moving parts. Hence DVD players are
sub-$100,
which I don't recall VCR's getting to. Recall when the original IBM PC's
were all TTL chips (what was it: 250-odd?)? Expensive. Then the VLSI
chips
came out integrating functions into single chips, the price came down,
etc.

DVD players are *occasionally* sub $100, and they achieve that by using
computer mechanisms for the most part. VCR prices have dropped to similar
levels to DVD players although it is rare to see them under $150.

The IBM PCs were repairable to an extent unheard of in the modern
computer, as were their predecessors. Ever heard of replacing a
northbridge or southbridge chip on a motherboard?

The economics have altered by making boards non-repairable, for example
by soldering chips into place instead of socketing as the early PCs had.
The cost of the original PC was not in the logic components, which were
cheap enough; it was from the proprietary architecture and the relatively
high costs of memory and peripherals, which were mostly made in the US at
the time.

Integrating logic into chipsets hasn't made a big difference to costs;
cutting overall production costs (by moving production to low wage
economies like China) has.

SO....how do you repair a single chip device? Even if it has a few extra
bits here and there, chances are if it isn't a switch, a track or
similar,
you can't repair it for less than a new device, on parts costs alone. If
it's for yourself, then fine, your time is worth nothing, but if it's
for a
living, you've got a problem.

Check DVD prices in the States - sub A$100. Cheap shit for sure, but there
you go. VCR prices are probably as low as they'll go before being made of
Unobtainium.

Yes, the original PC's were certainly repairable (did so myself, learnt
heaps!). They were labour intensive to build originally, plus of course the
premiums for the intellectual property. Sockets were a complete pain in the
arse (I won't dignify the idea by abbreviating that!) - I recall many boards
(IBM-compatibles and Apples especially) which had to be stripped of sockets
and rebuilt. It was worth it *only* because the original item was so
expensive.

I don't see how you can say that integration hasn't dropped prices though -
the prices dropped due to integration *way* before anyone built in China, or
even Korea or Taiwan. As you mentioned, it was all done in SiValley in the
'Good Old Days".

Cheers.

Ken
 
I have checked voltage to crt and it is at 262v.(I don't have specs)
I have replaced the diode feeding this which measured rather leaky.
I have now a better picture which looks normal at the top 1/5 of the
screen and from there dounwards the picture streches out more and more
into thin white horizontal lines.
Any further advice on what the problem could be? I will be happy to
solve this and maybe someone has the answer.
Thanking You.




alitonto@hotmail.com (AliTonto) wrote in message news:<6655e407.0406141932.32d92d93@posting.google.com>...
Yes, I think investigating the crt PCB further sounds hopefull; I will
check and return my results.
Thanks to all.



btvfxer@aol.com (BWL) wrote in message news:<20040614003139.02451.00001093@mb-m01.aol.com>...
Low 200v to the CRT will cause this as well; could be an open or changed value
resistor in the 200 volt circuit, usually powered by a winding/diode/filter cap
off the flyback transformer.
 
I have checked voltage to crt and it is at 262v.(I don't have specs)
I have replaced the diode feeding this which measured rather leaky.
I have now a better picture which looks normal at the top 1/5 of the
screen and from there dounwards the picture streches out more and more
into thin white horizontal lines.
Any further advice on what the problem could be? I will be happy to
solve this and maybe someone has the answer.
Thanking You.




alitonto@hotmail.com (AliTonto) wrote in message news:<6655e407.0406141932.32d92d93@posting.google.com>...
Yes, I think investigating the crt PCB further sounds hopefull; I will
check and return my results.
Thanks to all.



btvfxer@aol.com (BWL) wrote in message news:<20040614003139.02451.00001093@mb-m01.aol.com>...
Low 200v to the CRT will cause this as well; could be an open or changed value
resistor in the 200 volt circuit, usually powered by a winding/diode/filter cap
off the flyback transformer.
 
I would have to wonder how that would be possible - as by the look of
it - you never take your own hand off your cock
 
In article <cbd0ti$6qq$1@lust.ihug.co.nz>, embtwo@ihug.co.nz says...
In news:40d9fd00@news.orcon.net.nz,
Collector_NZ <collector_NZ@jun-kit.com> expelled:
Whats the simplest and easiest way to drop ~14v DC to 12v DC, source
voltage can vary by about .5V ether way.

7812 Voltage regulator IC - will do up to 1 amp with a decent heatsink,
LM338K (and a few other components) will do 5amps. Check out DSE or Jaycar
for prices. The DSE catalog has a wiring diagram for them in the data
pages.
These chips typically dropout about 2.5 - 3 volts. To get a reliable
voltage you will need a low dropout regulator or discrete circuitry using
a zener diode.

[added: aus.electronics, sci.electronics]
 
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 14:25:29 +1200, Patrick Dunford
<patrickdunford@nomail.invalid> wrote:

In article <cbd0ti$6qq$1@lust.ihug.co.nz>, embtwo@ihug.co.nz says...
In news:40d9fd00@news.orcon.net.nz,
Collector_NZ <collector_NZ@jun-kit.com> expelled:
Whats the simplest and easiest way to drop ~14v DC to 12v DC, source
voltage can vary by about .5V ether way.

7812 Voltage regulator IC - will do up to 1 amp with a decent heatsink,
LM338K (and a few other components) will do 5amps. Check out DSE or Jaycar
for prices. The DSE catalog has a wiring diagram for them in the data
pages.

These chips typically dropout about 2.5 - 3 volts. To get a reliable
voltage you will need a low dropout regulator or discrete circuitry using
a zener diode.

[added: aus.electronics, sci.electronics]
Get an LM2940-12 LVD regulator. 0.5v drop out voltage at 1Amp

see http://www.national.com/ds/LM/LM2940.pdf

Alan


++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Jenal Communications
Manufacturers and Suppliers of HF Selcall
P O Box 1108, Morley, WA, 6943
Tel: +61 8 9370 5533 Fax +61 8 9467 6146
Web Site: http://www.jenal.com
e-mail: http://www.jenal.com/?p=1
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top