OT: The cannibal left loves forcing females to compete against males!...

[Kevin Aylward]

\"Phil Allison\" wrote in message
news:35ccbf07-4d20-499e-a61c-caf40bcd872fn@googlegroups.com...

Kevin Aylward wrote:
=================
Phil Allison WROTE:

** Any born male athlete who chooses to call himself \"trans\" can do
that - fully knowing it ruins the event for everyone and the women
competitors hate them for it. They also know they cannot openly
complain about the fake trans competitors.

Yep. However, if ALL complained and rejected this absurdity the situation
would likely change.

** Athletes do * NOT * have a union protecting them.

Aspiring and leading competitors alike are all * signed up * members of a
governing association that
controls promotes the particular sport. Competitors have NO vote !!!

They cannot speak OR act against decisions made by their governing
committees.
To do any such thing so would mean the instant end of their careers in that
sport.
This is true of school, high school, university, amateur and professional
sports too.

That is why you hear no complaining voices !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.

So if fake or genuine trans ( ?) competitors are allowed in traditional
women only sports -
they have grin and bear it.

The International Olympic Committee ( IOC) has endorsed this anti-female
concept recently.
Abandoning all previous ideals of fair competition for born females.

Every sports competitor hates it, both genders, cos it is NASTY and
completely absurd.
Every sports fan hates it too.
It ruins the whole reason for them going and paying to watch.

The self appointed \" trans activists \" types behind this travesty are
nothing short of outright criminals.

Yes.


-- Kevin Aylward

http://www.anasoft.co.uk/ SuperSpice
http://www.kevinaylward.co.uk/ee/index.html

 

[Phil Allison]

Kevin Aylward wrote:
=================

** Any born male athlete who chooses to call himself \"trans\" can do
that - fully knowing it ruins the event for everyone and the women
competitors hate them for it. They also know they cannot openly
complain about the fake trans competitors.

Yep. However, if ALL complained and rejected this absurdity the situation
would likely change.


** Athletes do * NOT * have a union protecting them.

Aspiring and leading competitors alike are all * signed up * members of a
governing association that
controls promotes the particular sport. Competitors have NO vote !!!

They cannot speak OR act against decisions made by their governing
committees.
To do any such thing so would mean the instant end of their careers in that
sport.
This is true of school, high school, university, amateur and professional
sports too.

That is why you hear no complaining voices !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.

So if fake or genuine trans ( ?) competitors are allowed in traditional
women only sports -
they have grin and bear it.

The International Olympic Committee ( IOC) has endorsed this anti-female
concept recently.
Abandoning all previous ideals of fair competition for born females.

Every sports competitor hates it, both genders, cos it is NASTY and
completely absurd.
Every sports fan hates it too.
It ruins the whole reason for them going and paying to watch.

The self appointed \" trans activists \" types behind this travesty are
nothing short of outright criminals.

Yes.

** That is a damn good reply.


....... Phil

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Friday, December 17, 2021 at 8:19:52 AM UTC+11, Kevin Aylward wrote:

\"bitrex\" wrote in message news:3uJuJ.119903$Wkjc....@fx35.iad...
On 12/16/21 4:31 AM, Kevin Aylward wrote:

Sports are segregated based on sex, not mental state. Period. This has
been done for sound reasons that are as valid today as they have always
been.

If you\'re not testing the chromosomal makeup of every person who signs up
then you\'re not segregating based on biological sex in a rigorous way to
begin with.
FFS.

Its trivially obvious who is male and female for 99.9+% of cases.

And the incidence of gender dysphoria seems to be below 0.1%. Not that that\'s the problem. which seems to be people who have a desired to act and be accepted as somebody who has different sex chromosomes than the one they were born with. This is clearly irrational, but trying to reason them it of it doesn\'t work, and leads to a fairly high incidence of suicide.

> It has worked for 1000s of years. Dah....

After a fashion.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Androgen_insensitivity_syndrome

has been with us forever. It doesn\'t come up a frequently as gender dysphoria.

> You are only embarrassing yourself.

Or so Kevin imagines. If he had a better grasp of reality, he\'d realise that his face was the one with egg on it.

How else could you do it? the dick test? See if they have a dick or not
and you have team dick and team no-dick? Is that a sound investigative
procedure a scientist or engineer would come up with? what the fuck is
this.

FFS.... again....

Its called a birth certificate. It used to be a passport, but that\'s been
bastadised in some countries now. Fortunately, the UK is still holding out.

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/gender-neutral-passport-challenge-fails-at-supreme-court-txxh5bm3l

Birth certificates aren\'t based on chromosome counts. Androgen insensitivity syndrome will lead to wrong data being registered quite often, for people who exhibit it (though they are rare).

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Friday, December 17, 2021 at 8:20:16 AM UTC+11, Kevin Aylward wrote:

\"David Brown\" wrote in message news:spf171$hcj$1...@dont-email.me...
On 16/12/2021 09:39, Kevin Aylward wrote:
\"Anthony William Sloman\" wrote in message
news:b38903c5-92d2-432d...@googlegroups.com...

John Doe has a vivid imagination and no connection with reality.

Most fascinating is the DISTINCT possibility males who want to be
females will indeed be allowed to destroy female sports.

How do they \"destroy\" female sports? They certainly can\'t be
guaranteed to win every event in which they take part - the
distribution of male and female >performances mostly overlap. The male
high performing tail tends to do better than the female high
performing tail, but transgender males aren\'t drawn >exclusively from
that high-performing tail.

Ho humm.... complete ignorance as to how statistics works.

The distribution of the top females and the top males do not overlap,
and that\'s what matters. The best males in just about every single sport
known is such that no top female can beat the top males.

Looking just at the tail of the distribution demonstrates complete ignorance of how statistics work - or total ineptitude in comprehending what\'s going on.
In this case Kevin is merely looking for a sound bite, so it\'s simple bullshit.

Not all sports are dependent on size and strength (though many are). In
swimming, for example, the differences are often quite small. In horse
riding and archery, there is no difference. In gymnastics, biological
men would not stand a chance against biological women in the women\'s
events. Any sport judged by style (diving, figure skating, etc.) is in
theory unbiased. And in any sport with weight classes will be
relatively fair.


This has been known and verified for 1000s of years.

Its trivially obvious that if males claiming to be woman continue
competing against females in sports, females will never hold world
records. Its astounding that anyone can deny this.


It is trivially obvious that for most sports, a top-class woman athlete
will be better at her sport than 99.9% or more males (classifying purely
on binary male/female biology). So a serious woman runner will out-run
almost any man - only /serious/ male runners will beat her.

Meaningless twaddle.

Kevin doesn\'t want to think about it.

> At every level, people compete at their level. At each level, males are better than females in most sport. End of.

And wants to reiterate his self-serving over-simplification.

Transgender people will come from that 99.9% mass, approximately 99.9%
of the time. In fact, it is even more likely that a transgender woman.

There is no such entity as a transgender woman. A woman is a woman. Period.

If you are stuck with Kevin\'s comprehension problem.

> There is a single name for men claiming to be woman. Its transwoman.

In Kevin\'s rather specialised vocabulary. Words mean what most people think they mean, and meaning does change with time.

will be relatively small and weak, as before confirming their identity
as a women, the person was likely to emphasise traditional feminine
traits and activities rather than traditional masculine ones.
But to suggest it will \"destroy\" female sports is simply paranoia, ignorance, bigotry and intolerance.

Delusional twaddle.

In the opinion of a ignorant and intolerant bigot.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

-- Kevin Aylward

http://www.anasoft.co.uk/ SuperSpice
http://www.kevinaylward.co.uk/ee/index.html

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Friday, December 17, 2021 at 8:20:34 AM UTC+11, Kevin Aylward wrote:

\"Anthony William Sloman\" wrote in message
news:ef13b082-b9e3-4ed0...@googlegroups.com...
On Thursday, December 16, 2021 at 8:32:10 PM UTC+11, Kevin Aylward wrote:
\"Anthony William Sloman\" wrote in message
news:322ddbe8-0b87-4661...@googlegroups.com...
** Any born male athlete who chooses to call himself \"trans\" can do
that - fully knowing it ruins the event for everyone and the women
competitors hate >>them for it. They also know they cannot openly
complain about the fake trans competitors.

Yep. However, if ALL complained and rejected this absurdity the situation
would likely change.

I doubt if it works that way. Anybody whose doctors are convinced will
eventually need gender reassignment surgery may get hormone treatment to
prepare .

\"Gender\" cannot be surgically reassigned, such a concept is meaningless.

Don\'t tell me - tell the doctors who label the treatment.

\"Gender\" is attributed to behaviour and mental state not physical
characteristics, thus \"gender\" is not amenable to physical changes by way of surgery.

But surgery can - and does - make it easier for the patient to play the role they want to, which is why it is an accepted treatment.

Sure, historically, the words \"gender and \"sex\" were alias for each other
and stood for biology. This is no longer the case, thus one needs to be
precise in exactly what is being addressed.

Cosmetic mutilation surgery, such as removing penises are performed because men claiming to be woman desire to look like woman, otherwise they wouldn\'t do it.

\"They\" don\'t do it.

Pissing in the wind.

Being pedantic about word choice is something you go in for too..

Surgeons who have been convinced that it is in the patient\'s best interest do the job.

Nope.

Medical ethics starts of with \"do no harm\".

That kind of patient has a tendency to commit suicide if they don\'t get that kind of help.

Twaddle.

But you can\'t be bothered to find the statistical evidence which might contradict a factual assertion - probably because you tried and found that it didn\'t.

Thus such men inherently hold the view that being a woman is about physical appearance, that is about biology, despite disingenuously claiming that its actually about a mental state of mind.

The actual claim is that they want to be perceived - and treated a women. There nothing disingenuous about that.
Nope. Sure, a few might.

No heterosexual man or lesbian woman is going to treat a man as a real
woman.
Since the state of mind involved frequently leads to suicide when the
sufferer doesn\'t get surgical help, the fact it is merely a mental
condition doesn\'t >mean that one shouldn\'t take it seriously.
More twaddle.
Biological sex is binary and immutable. Thus a \"sex change\" is also
impossible. Period.

But a change of appearance is entirely possible, and is known to solve the
mental problem in many cases. As usual, Kevin is addressing the wrong
problem, >and coming to the wrong conclusion, with his usual faith in his
own defective reasoning.
Nope. I am addressing the actual problems the trans delusion is creating for
vast numbers of people. Its woman\'s spaces, its sports
Those that desire to remove healthy parts of their bodies require
psychological treatment, not affirmation.

This has been tried, and doesn\'t seem to stop them killing themselves too
frequently for comfort. Kevin feels free to ignore this - probably because
he hasn\'t had his nose rubbed in it by patients doing themselves in.

Nope. The claims that trans are all committing suicide when not pandered to
is just incoherent babbling. There is no evidence to support that claim.

But Kevin hasn\'t been able to find any evidence to falsify it.

Its astounding that those with a psychological delusion are pandered to, as if their psychosis is normal.

It\'s not a normal condition.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_dysphoria

is non-committal about the incidence, but it seems to be fewer than one in
several thousand. It\'s not a psychosis - the people involved tend to be
quite >realistic about the situation.

Sure, gender dysphoria is a real medical condition. Unfortunately large
numbers of trans don\'t accept that they have a problem, there believe that
they are normal. There lies the problem.

They obviously don\'t believe that they are \"normal\". They do seem to believe that they need to act as if weren\'t of the physical sex they wre born into.

You really don\'t know what happening. Claims of transgender have been
ramping up 10+ fold its getting to the 1%+

So what.

That is, they believe something that is contradictory to physical reality.

They don\'t. They just don\'t like the physically real situation and prefer to be treated in a way that doesn\'t match their chromosome.

Totally clueless. You are living in your own little world with no comprehension just how the trans ideology has infected mainstream activities.

Totally bonkers. Kevin - as a right wing lunatic - wants to believe that world is going to hell in a handbasket. and is obsessing about gender dysphoria as one of the \"symptoms\".

There should be no difference to response to those that claim that they are of the opposite sex/gender than that response that one would engage in to those that believe that they are Elvis, Napoleon or Jesus.

Except that the claim isn\'t that they are of the opposite sex, merely that
they\'d prefer to be treated as if they were.

Totally clueless to what\'s actually happening. Large numbers of trans ideologists claim that they are of the opposite sex. Dah....

They are probably as silly as you are. Ideologists like you can be remarkably nrealistic.

> You need to understand that the trans activists and mainstream media buy into the fact that a Transwoman is a real woman in every way.

They may buy into the fact that treating them as if they were may make them happier. They wouldn\'t be a great market for pregnancy test kits.

> ... and I\'ve had enough, you are too far gone. You have no idea what is actually happening.

I\'ve got a pretty clear idea of what you think is happening, and how totally bonkers your delusions are.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Friday, December 17, 2021 at 9:08:32 AM UTC+11, palli...@gmail.com wrote:

Kevin Aylward wrote:
=================

** Any born male athlete who chooses to call himself \"trans\" can do
that - fully knowing it ruins the event for everyone and the women
competitors hate them for it. They also know they cannot openly
complain about the fake trans competitors.

Yep. However, if ALL complained and rejected this absurdity the situation
would likely change.


** Athletes do * NOT * have a union protecting them.

Aspiring and leading competitors alike are all * signed up * members of a
governing association that
controls promotes the particular sport. Competitors have NO vote !!!

They cannot speak OR act against decisions made by their governing
committees.
To do any such thing so would mean the instant end of their careers in that
sport.
This is true of school, high school, university, amateur and professional
sports too.

That is why you hear no complaining voices !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.

So if fake or genuine trans ( ?) competitors are allowed in traditional
women only sports -
they have grin and bear it.

The International Olympic Committee ( IOC) has endorsed this anti-female
concept recently.
Abandoning all previous ideals of fair competition for born females.

Every sports competitor hates it, both genders, cos it is NASTY and
completely absurd.
Every sports fan hates it too.
It ruins the whole reason for them going and paying to watch.

The self appointed \" trans activists \" types behind this travesty are
nothing short of outright criminals.

Yes.

** That is a damn good reply.

It\'s clearly the sort of reply Phil likes to see. He wouldn\'t watch Sky News if he didn\'t like having his right-wing delusions pandered to.

Odd that you can get prosecuted for distributing pornography involving children, but can make money out of distributing the same level of mischievous misinformation on other topics

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[bitrex]

On 12/16/21 4:19 PM, Kevin Aylward wrote:

\"bitrex\"  wrote in message news:3uJuJ.119903$Wkjc.84725@fx35.iad...

On 12/16/21 4:31 AM, Kevin Aylward wrote:

Sports are segregated based on sex, not mental state.  Period. This
has been done for sound reasons that are as valid today as they have
always been.

If you\'re not testing the chromosomal makeup of every person who signs
up then you\'re not segregating based on biological sex in a rigorous
way to begin with.

FFS.

Its trivially obvious who is male and female for 99.9+% of cases.

Its worked for 1000s of years. Dah....

And women have been easily fooling men into thinking they\'re men for
1000s of years also using some of the oldest tricks in the book, just
with respect to American history it happened in the Revolutionary war
and the Civil War and it sometimes took months or years for men to
discover these \"frauds\" and for every one they caught there were likely
many they didn\'t.

You are only embarrassing yourself.

How else could you do it? the dick test? See if they have a dick or
not and you have team dick and team no-dick? Is that a sound
investigative procedure a scientist or engineer would come up with?
what the fuck is this.

FFS.... again....

Its called a birth certificate. It used to be a passport, but that\'s
been bastadised in some countries now. Fortunately, the UK is still
holding out.

The same world of pro athletics that\'s been regularly rocked by scandals
over athletes and whole teams and whole countries going to the most
absurd lengths to gain an edge in competition and nobody\'s gonna fake a
fuckin\' birth certificate though? That\'s not a rigorous process.

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/gender-neutral-passport-challenge-fails-at-supreme-court-txxh5bm3l


-- Kevin Aylward

http://www.anasoft.co.uk/ SuperSpice
http://www.kevinaylward.co.uk/ee/index.html

 

[bitrex]

On 12/16/21 6:15 PM, Anthony William Sloman wrote:

On Friday, December 17, 2021 at 8:20:16 AM UTC+11, Kevin Aylward wrote:
\"David Brown\" wrote in message news:spf171$hcj$1...@dont-email.me...
On 16/12/2021 09:39, Kevin Aylward wrote:
\"Anthony William Sloman\" wrote in message
news:b38903c5-92d2-432d...@googlegroups.com...

John Doe has a vivid imagination and no connection with reality.

Most fascinating is the DISTINCT possibility males who want to be
females will indeed be allowed to destroy female sports.

How do they \"destroy\" female sports? They certainly can\'t be
guaranteed to win every event in which they take part - the
distribution of male and female >performances mostly overlap. The male
high performing tail tends to do better than the female high
performing tail, but transgender males aren\'t drawn >exclusively from
that high-performing tail.

Ho humm.... complete ignorance as to how statistics works.

The distribution of the top females and the top males do not overlap,
and that\'s what matters. The best males in just about every single sport
known is such that no top female can beat the top males.

Looking just at the tail of the distribution demonstrates complete ignorance of how statistics work - or total ineptitude in comprehending what\'s going on.
In this case Kevin is merely looking for a sound bite, so it\'s simple bullshit.

Not all sports are dependent on size and strength (though many are). In
swimming, for example, the differences are often quite small. In horse
riding and archery, there is no difference. In gymnastics, biological
men would not stand a chance against biological women in the women\'s
events. Any sport judged by style (diving, figure skating, etc.) is in
theory unbiased. And in any sport with weight classes will be
relatively fair.


This has been known and verified for 1000s of years.

Its trivially obvious that if males claiming to be woman continue
competing against females in sports, females will never hold world
records. Its astounding that anyone can deny this.


It is trivially obvious that for most sports, a top-class woman athlete
will be better at her sport than 99.9% or more males (classifying purely
on binary male/female biology). So a serious woman runner will out-run
almost any man - only /serious/ male runners will beat her.

Meaningless twaddle.

Kevin doesn\'t want to think about it.

At every level, people compete at their level. At each level, males are better than females in most sport. End of.

And wants to reiterate his self-serving over-simplification.

Transgender people will come from that 99.9% mass, approximately 99.9%
of the time. In fact, it is even more likely that a transgender woman.

There is no such entity as a transgender woman. A woman is a woman. Period.

If you are stuck with Kevin\'s comprehension problem.

There is a single name for men claiming to be woman. Its transwoman.

In Kevin\'s rather specialised vocabulary. Words mean what most people think they mean, and meaning does change with time.

will be relatively small and weak, as before confirming their identity
as a women, the person was likely to emphasise traditional feminine
traits and activities rather than traditional masculine ones.
But to suggest it will \"destroy\" female sports is simply paranoia, ignorance, bigotry and intolerance.

Delusional twaddle.

In the opinion of a ignorant and intolerant bigot.

If one takes the statement \"Western culture is degenerating from a more
ideal state it was once in\" as an axiom then there certainly must be a
reason, there must be persons responsible, and the search for the guilty
will lead you places sooner-or-later. Silly places, but the axiom
demands conclusions whatever they are.

 

[bitrex]

On 12/17/21 12:51 AM, bitrex wrote:

On 12/16/21 6:15 PM, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Friday, December 17, 2021 at 8:20:16 AM UTC+11, Kevin Aylward wrote:
\"David Brown\" wrote in message news:spf171$hcj$1...@dont-email.me...
On 16/12/2021 09:39, Kevin Aylward wrote:
\"Anthony William Sloman\" wrote in message
news:b38903c5-92d2-432d...@googlegroups.com...

John Doe has a vivid imagination and no connection with reality.

Most fascinating is the DISTINCT possibility males who want to be
females will indeed be allowed to destroy female sports.

How do they \"destroy\" female sports? They certainly can\'t be
guaranteed to win every event in which they take part - the
distribution of male and female >performances mostly overlap. The
male
high performing tail tends to do better than the female high
performing tail, but transgender males aren\'t drawn >exclusively from
that high-performing tail.

Ho humm.... complete ignorance as to how statistics works.

The distribution of the top females and the top males do not overlap,
and that\'s what matters. The best males in just about every single
sport
known is such that no top female can beat the top males.

Looking just at the tail of the distribution demonstrates complete
ignorance of how statistics work - or total ineptitude in
comprehending what\'s going on.
In this case Kevin is merely looking for a sound bite, so it\'s simple
bullshit.
Not all sports are dependent on size and strength (though many are). In
swimming, for example, the differences are often quite small. In horse
riding and archery, there is no difference. In gymnastics, biological
men would not stand a chance against biological women in the women\'s
events. Any sport judged by style (diving, figure skating, etc.) is in
theory unbiased. And in any sport with weight classes will be
relatively fair.


This has been known and verified for 1000s of years.

Its trivially obvious that if males claiming to be woman continue
competing against females in sports, females will never hold world
records. Its astounding that anyone can deny this.


It is trivially obvious that for most sports, a top-class woman athlete
will be better at her sport than 99.9% or more males (classifying
purely
on binary male/female biology). So a serious woman runner will out-run
almost any man - only /serious/ male runners will beat her.

Meaningless twaddle.

Kevin doesn\'t want to think about it.
At every level, people compete at their level. At each level, males
are  better than females in most sport. End of.

And wants to reiterate his self-serving over-simplification.

Transgender people will come from that 99.9% mass, approximately 99.9%
of the time. In fact, it is even more likely that a transgender woman.

There is no such entity as a transgender woman. A woman is a woman.
Period.

If you are stuck with Kevin\'s comprehension problem.

There is a single name for men claiming to be woman. Its transwoman.

In Kevin\'s rather specialised vocabulary. Words mean what most people
think they mean, and meaning does change with time.

will be relatively small and weak, as before confirming their identity
as a women, the person was likely to emphasise traditional feminine
traits and activities rather than traditional masculine ones.
But to suggest it will \"destroy\" female sports is simply paranoia,
ignorance, bigotry and intolerance.

Delusional twaddle.

In the opinion of a ignorant and  intolerant bigot.


If one takes the statement \"Western culture is degenerating from a more
ideal state it was once in\" as an axiom then there certainly must be a
reason, there must be persons responsible, and the search for the guilty
will lead you places sooner-or-later. Silly places, but the axiom
demands conclusions whatever they are.

\"axiom\" probably isn\'t the right word, more like \"law of nature.\"

 

[Kevin Aylward]

\"Anthony William Sloman\" wrote in message
news:1dac900c-3dd8-49db-82c5-3e7d306c75c8n@googlegroups.com...

That kind of patient has a tendency to commit suicide if they don\'t get
that kind of help.

Twaddle.

But you can\'t be bothered to find the statistical evidence which might
contradict a factual assertion - probably because you tried and found that
it didn\'t.

Ho hum.... present *your* evidence to *your* claim. The onus is on you.

\"That which is asserted without evidence, may be dismissed without evidence\"

I didn\'t make the suicide claim....Dah..... However.... I was and am aware
of the actually data.

https://www.transgendertrend.com/the-suicide-myth/

US Study

\"A more rigorous study was published in the journal Pediatrics in 2018.
Transgender Adolescent Suicide Behaviour (Toomey et al) 8 uses data on
121,000 adolescents aged from 11 to 19, who were surveyed at schools across
the United States. In this study all the risk factors for attempted suicide,
including sex and gender identity, sexual orientation, age, race, and
parental education, are statistically analysed. Michael Biggs analysed the
study results and his finding was that, statistically, the group most likely
to report a suicide attempt is gender-non-conforming females, irrespective
of how they identify or their sexual orientation. 9\"

From the table, transwoman attempted suicide is a little over twice that of
a heterosexual adolescent.

Thus your claim is proven twaddle, as I claimed...

\"What are the facts about suicide and self-harm?\"

\"Michael Biggs analysed the Tavistock GIDS and national suicide figures and
found that suicide amongst young children in England and Wales is,
thankfully, vanishingly rare and there is no evidence that there is a high
rate among trans-identified children. In teenagers there are other
conditions that carry a higher suicide risk, including anorexia, depression
and autism.11 The Samaritans reported this year that suicides among teenage
girls and young women between the ages of 10 and 24 have almost doubled in
seven years, increasing by 94 per cent since 2012.12 All of these factors
may be significant when considering the adolescents who are being referred
to the Tavistock GIDS.

\"The Tavistock GIDS states on the Evidence page of their website that
amongst children referred to the clinic “suicide is extremely rare.” 13\"\"


You just parrot off anything that suits your leftist, delusional, agenda.

-- Kevin Aylward

http://www.anasoft.co.uk/ SuperSpice
http://www.kevinaylward.co.uk/ee/index.html

 

[Kevin Aylward]

\"Anthony William Sloman\" wrote in message
news:f47cdaf0-e9c5-4854-ac06-93dc68e730ben@googlegroups.com...

Delusional twaddle.

In the opinion of a ignorant and intolerant bigot.

Yeah...this is what bigots are, they promote the total shutdown of any view
that isn\'t in accordance to their ideology.:

https://sex-matters.org/posts/the-legal-system/law-commission-recommends-protection-for-gender-critical-views-from-chilling-effect/

Stonewall and GIRES:

\".... We think it would be harmful to afford legal protection to people who
engage in ‘the discussion or criticism of gender reassignment; treatment for
gender dysphoria; provision of and access to single-sex facilities and
activities’...\"

This is a fundamental factor in the definition of a bigot. Complete
intolerance to any opposing views.

They don\'t want anyone even discussing the issue because any discussion
immediately shows that their view is delusional.

You have no f\'ing idea what the gender ideology is, and how far entrenched
such a repugnant ideology is in entities in positions of power.

-- Kevin Aylward

http://www.anasoft.co.uk/ SuperSpice
http://www.kevinaylward.co.uk/ee/index.html

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Friday, December 17, 2021 at 9:51:52 PM UTC+11, Kevin Aylward wrote:

\"Anthony William Sloman\" wrote in message
news:f47cdaf0-e9c5-4854...@googlegroups.com...
Delusional twaddle.

In the opinion of a ignorant and intolerant bigot.

Yeah...this is what bigots are, they promote the total shutdown of any view that isn\'t in accordance to their ideology.:

That does fit you to a tee.

<snipped the legal opinions about the nature of the legal protections that might be appropriate, which doesn\'t strike me as relevant to this discussion>

> This is a fundamental factor in the definition of a bigot. Complete intolerance to any opposing views.

And repeated assertion of the same superficial opinions, which pretty much covers your contributions.

> They don\'t want anyone even discussing the issue because any discussion immediately shows that their view is delusional.

Your view clearly is.

> You have no f\'ing idea what the gender ideology is, and how far entrenched such a repugnant ideology is in entities in positions of power.

The only \"gender ideology\" I\'m aware of is all about making it less likely that people who suffer from gender dysphoria end up killing themselves.

Your attitude seems to be that we ought to encourage them to feel rotten about their unfortunate mental state.

Happily that attitude does seem to be only entrenched in people who are much too obviously bigoted to be let anywhere near positions of power.
That would include you. You may be disappointed that the rational majority doesn\'t take you seriously, but you really ought to blame the repugnant ideology you are putting forward. Sadly, you lack the kind of insight that might clue you in to exactly how repugnant it is.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Kevin Aylward]

\"David Brown\" wrote in message news:sphrgi$220$1@dont-email.me...

On 16/12/2021 22:20, Kevin Aylward wrote:

\"David Brown\" wrote in message news:spf171$hcj$1@dont-email.me...


There is no such entity as a transgender woman. A woman is a woman.
Period. There is a single name for men claiming to be woman. Its
transwoman.


I always find it amazing how some people seem so proud of their
ignorance - wearing it like a Blue Peter badge.

What part of the following do you not understand?

A female is the type of a species that has provides the large gamete, that
is the egg

A male is the type of a species that provides the small gamete, that is the
sperm

Definition Woman: Adult human female

Definition Man: Adult human male.

There are only two sex types, and for the human species, one can not change
into the other.

No amount of gaslighting can change basic facts of biology.

Sure, its astounding that there are those such as you that clearly exhibit
the Dunning-Kruger effect.

-- Kevin Aylward

http://www.anasoft.co.uk/ SuperSpice
http://www.kevinaylward.co.uk/ee/index.html

 

[Kevin Aylward]

\"Anthony William Sloman\" wrote in message
news:243f6fc5-db60-4886-8dcd-21bb3032a71en@googlegroups.com...

They don\'t want anyone even discussing the issue because any discussion
immediately shows that their view is delusional.

Your view clearly is.

You have no f\'ing idea what the gender ideology is, and how far
entrenched such a repugnant ideology is in entities in positions of
power.

The only \"gender ideology\" I\'m aware of is all about making it less likely
that people who suffer from gender dysphoria end up killing themselves.

Sure, you are clueless about the issue.

Twitter allows trans activist to threaten MPs and lock out people simply
tweeting what was said in Parliament on a gender debate.:



\"UK Human Rights Comm. MP Joanna Cherry questions Twitter on allowing
violence against women\"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3X0LXARUTE

and locks out people simply tweeting what was said in Parliament becuse the
view is not complementary to the trans lobby

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3X0LXARUTE 15:50


You are clearly senile. There is extensive identification of the the
disaster caused by trans ideology, you are just to stupid to understand.

https://sex-matters.org/
https://www.transgendertrend.com/
https://fairplayforwomen.com/
https://www.faircop.org.uk/

Sure, woman have penises and rape other woman, according to the Scottish
police. Yeah... right on....

Its f\'ing insane.



-- Kevin Aylward

http://www.anasoft.co.uk/ SuperSpice
http://www.kevinaylward.co.uk/ee/index.html

 

[Phil Allison]

David Brown should FOAD puked:
=========================

Kevin Aylward wrote:

But to suggest it will \"destroy\" female sports is simply paranoia, ignorance,
bigotry and intolerance.

Delusional twaddle.

In more recent news, I\'ve just heard that the Women\'s Football World Cup
was cancelled. The Olympics Committee have decided to switch to
male-only events, all in the nude - just like in ancient Greece after a
race was won by a women disguised as a man. And schools everywhere are
being told to cancel gym classes for girls, and replace them with
something more appropriate such as embroidery classes.

Or perhaps women\'s sport is not being destroyed at all, and it\'s time
you found another storm in a teacup to grouch about.

** Now that is damn funny !!.

Some bullshitting, fucking IDIOT gets fairly accused of posting \"twaddle\"
- then goes and does that *exact thing* again and again.

Wot a hoot !!


...... Phil

 

[Jasen Betts]

On 2021-12-17, Kevin Aylward <kevinRemoveandReplaceATkevinaylward.co.uk> wrote:

\"Anthony William Sloman\" wrote in message
news:1dac900c-3dd8-49db-82c5-3e7d306c75c8n@googlegroups.com...


That kind of patient has a tendency to commit suicide if they don\'t get
that kind of help.

Twaddle.

But you can\'t be bothered to find the statistical evidence which might
contradict a factual assertion - probably because you tried and found that
it didn\'t.

Ho hum.... present *your* evidence to *your* claim. The onus is on you.

\"That which is asserted without evidence, may be dismissed without evidence\"

I didn\'t make the suicide claim....Dah..... However.... I was and am aware
of the actually data.

https://www.transgendertrend.com/the-suicide-myth/

Actual data that does not address the claim, why do you mention it?

--
Jasen.

 

[Phil Allison]

Kevin Aylward wrote:
================

But to suggest it will \"destroy\" female sports is simply paranoia, ignorance,
bigotry and intolerance.

Delusional twaddle.
-- Kevin Aylward

** What is going on here is very obvious.

Fact: this NG is chock full of *colossal nerds*.

Egs, IEEE Bill, JL, Phil H, bitrex and a host of others.

Two things that all such nerds famously dislike and studiously avoid in their lives are *sports* and *women*.
They typically consider all sports to be worthless and have no empathy for women.

Here we have an issue that involves both sport and women mixed up with crazy males pretending to be female.

A guaranteed recipe for rampant cognitive dissonance.
If you are a nerd.


....... Phil

 

[Joe Gwinn]

On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 19:43:19 -0000, \"Kevin Aylward\"
<kevinRemoveandReplaceATkevinaylward.co.uk> wrote:

[snip]

Sure, woman have penises and rape other woman, according to the Scottish
police. Yeah... right on....

I cannot speak for the Scottish Police, but do I have a story:

In the late 1970s, I lived in Baltimore, and frequented a local pub.
One evening, when I arrived there were some new people at the table,
in particular a young woman whose husband had just died unexpectedly,
and she was in grief, as one would expect. She had come with one of
the regulars, I assume. Another woman (also new) was hitting on the
grieving widow, trying to convince the widow to come home with her.

I don\'t how to say this politely, but the second woman was a butch
dyke, made no secret of it., and was twice the size of the widow.

While people in the pub normally didn\'t interfere with pickups, in
this case, the entire table interfered with the dyke, seeing that the
widow was not thinking clearly, and was not understanding or agreeing
to what was on offer. In short, this would have been a rape. (And
strap-on penises do exist.)

That night, the widow went home alone. And she clearly counted this
as a save -- she later gave herself to the leader of the resistance.
(Not me, sadly.)

Joe Gwinn

 

[server]

bitrex <user@example.net> wrote in
news:daMuJ.81985$OB3.61590@fx06.iad:

On 12/16/21 1:58 PM, DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org
wrote:
David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> wrote in
news:spfd8b$4gk$1@dont-email.me:

On 16/12/2021 13:18, Phil Allison wrote:
David Brown Shat His underpants wrote:
============================

** Not one bit true at all.

Brown - you are known, lying fucking IDIOT
No need exists to keep on proving it.

Get cancer and fucking DIE you POS.


I\'ve had a break from this newsgroup for a while, but it seems
little has changed.


** Take a * MUCH LONGER * break you fucking, POS moron.

Like the whole rest of you miserable life.
-----------------------------------------------------------
--- ---


You really ought to see a specialist - you are a seriously
damaged person. I can\'t imagine what could go wrong in a
person\'s life to leave them in the state you are in.

Excellent observation. You are a \"known\" sooth sayer, as far
as I
am concerned.

Allison is the one \"known\" to be \"a lying fucking IDIOT\".

Get cancer? Die? He is the one who should be \"getting
death\". IF
we were anything like these ridiculously sad examples of human
beings, we would have minced them up and fed them to the
alligators decades ago. They are damn lucky we are on the \"nice\"
side of it all.


Sometimes I miss the good ol\' days when how much of a \"real man\"
you were was in large part directly related to how many women you
banged and/or how often. Wild concept, I know.

Yeah... Just ask Kareem Abdul-Jabbar.

My \'60s muscle car era hippie older brother had a list he kept on a
legal pad in his tool box. The listings even had little cherry
clusters in front of some of them.

My women were all far more precious than any one night stands.

However my last was most famous(to me)for always saying to me
(after several hours) \"Don\'t... stop... don\'t... stop...\"
I could never tell what she meant. ;-)

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Saturday, December 18, 2021 at 7:50:16 AM UTC+11, palli...@gmail.com wrote:

Kevin Aylward wrote:
===============
But to suggest it will \"destroy\" female sports is simply paranoia, ignorance,
bigotry and intolerance.

Delusional twaddle.

** What is going on here is very obvious.

Fact: this NG is chock full of *colossal nerds*.

Egs, IEEE Bill, JL, Phil H, bitrex and a host of others.

Two things that all such nerds famously dislike and studiously avoid in their lives are *sports* and *women*.
They typically consider all sports to be worthless and have no empathy for women.

Then I\'m not a typical nerd, since I played field hockey all my life - my last game was in 2010 when I was 67. In the Netherlands I played \"trimhockey\" which was mixed - five women and six men in a team. I got on fine with both the male and female players. How much \"empathy\" I might have had is anybody\'s guess - it;s not a well-defined term. \"Enough\" is probably correct.

Here we have an issue that involves both sport and women mixed up with crazy males pretending to be female.

A guaranteed recipe for rampant cognitive dissonance.

Phil might have trouble recognising cognitive dissonance. He seems to want to use it as synonym for \"disagreeing with Phil\'s sillier ideas\".

> If you are a nerd.

Phil seems to be enthusiastic about projecting his own psychological problems onto other people. He seems to imagine that most of the population is autistic when the real incidence is perhaps one percent of the population.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney