T
Trevor Wilson
Guest
On 12/7/2011 8:48 AM, Jeßus wrote:
other 'debaters' in this thread)?
--
kreed wrote:
Thats because its not. It's mostly fabricated crap in order to get the
result they are paid
to get and it is laugable. The peers that review this garbage are
just as corrupt as the authors.
--
Kreed wrote:
When you look at the staggering amounts of money and power at stake
here, buying off
these organisations (note most are gov funded) would cost lunch money
by comparison
There is one rule that always applies, -- IT IS ALWAYS ABOUT THE
MONEY / POWER. This is how
it always has been.
When you look at how things work in real life, and not in TV land or
Government land, this is the only answer.
--
atec77 wrote:
The reality is we all knew the model tweva aspires to was is and will
remain flawed due to data being made to fit the requirements
Now that climate-gate is openly being examined it's patently obvious
tweva is a fuckwitt , next time I get down Melbourne and time permits I
intend explaining in person exactly why he is
--
atec77 wrote:
just shows how little tweva matters , sydney then as I hear his silly
little shop is hidden in some backwater at the wrong side of town for me
so the visiting might be to much trouble , either way the bloke is still
a fuckwitt
--
kreed wrote:
Bloody hell, for an "expert" on spotting good and bad "science" you
are a real riot Trev.
On the other hand, based on what we see these days, it is possible
that DDT ill effects
were pushed aside for financial gain - kind of like what "warmists" do
now for financial gain, or to protect financial gain..
Much easier to do back then with no internet or other
public ways of mass info dissemination other than mainstream media.
--
Bernd Felsche wrote:
Mounting evidence? Steaming piles of manure.
Pure Gedankenexperiments and soothsaying akin to reading the
entrails of chickens.
--
Noddy wrote:
The one were most of the "credible" scientists in England who have been
associated with it for a number of years are now largely in hiding after
it was recently revealed that their modelling was wrong (and they knew
it) and that their principal objective was to scare the shit out of the
public to ensure continued funding.
--
kreed wrote:
The IPCC reports are not relevant. Its paid, corrupted, agenda based
"science". The IPCC has little credibility and it won't be accepted
in a rational discussion.
Kind of like asking a used car salesman or a politician (hmmm... bad
example as I know Trev worships labor pollies and big banks)
Kind of like asking Hitler for advice on advancing the rights of
Jewish people, and having blind faith and belief in all he says ?
--
kreed wrote:
Anyone who debunks this AGW garbage is not going to be allowed a voice
or funding for their
research as they cost the big guys trillions.
--
kreed wrote:
If the ABC bought and paid for news and current affairs programs say
there is man made global warming, because its being told by a bimbo
news announcer with no qualifications, that means I should ignore it
too ! Thanks for clarifying that Twever.
--
'Lindsay' wrote:
Ask him about his elastic seine net killfile. It's a Twev special. It
breathes like a human lung, and lets people in and out whenever he sees
fit,
but he forgets to tell anyone, until it suits his dodgy arguements.
At one stage he had every "John" on the net in there, and expected me to
pick one. I picked John the Baptist, John Lennon, John Cleese, which were
all wrong.
--
kreed wrote:
Now that that is over we shall see. The basics are is that it is a
tax, and therefore state theft of private property without consent,
and that governments are only good at turning things to shit means
inherently overall it has to have a BAD effect.
--
That'll do. I'm bored now. There is more. MUCH more. Not only are these
comments littered with gratuitous insults, NONE are backed with cites or
anything resembling facts. How do you expect me to respond when faced
with such purile nonsense?
When presented with credible cites and some facts, I will always be
happy to respond in kind. When I am presented with gratiutous and
childish insults, I will expose the insulter for what they are. Think of
my posts as a mirror. Don't like what you see? Then act responsibly.
--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au
**Fair enough. I take it yhou have no issue with these comments (fromOn Mon, 5 Dec 2011 20:26:41 +1100, "Lindsay"
ask.me.for.it@hornet.net.ay.you> wrote:
"Jeßus"<none@all.invalid> wrote in message
news:6oood7l9rbe6f6cvos3a4vnhqq2gdmns5h@4ax.com...
I should have known better. How many times are you going to try to
infer that we all listen to that moron Alan Jones? I haven't even
stated my opinion on GW, in case you haven't noticed!
You, Trevor, are a fucking idiot. Time to filter you again.
Seems to be a popular and growing perception. Maybe he has some "issues"
that he needs to confront...
Ask him about his elastic seine net killfile. It's a Twev special. It
breathes like a human lung, and lets people in and out whenever he sees fit,
but he forgets to tell anyone, until it suits his dodgy arguements.
At one stage he had every "John" on the net in there, and expected me to
pick one. I picked John the Baptist, John Lennon, John Cleese, which were
all wrong.
He's strange, is twev....
Indeed. I have no problem with his having views on *whatever*, but the
way he debates them is another matter.
other 'debaters' in this thread)?
--
kreed wrote:
Thats because its not. It's mostly fabricated crap in order to get the
result they are paid
to get and it is laugable. The peers that review this garbage are
just as corrupt as the authors.
--
Kreed wrote:
When you look at the staggering amounts of money and power at stake
here, buying off
these organisations (note most are gov funded) would cost lunch money
by comparison
There is one rule that always applies, -- IT IS ALWAYS ABOUT THE
MONEY / POWER. This is how
it always has been.
When you look at how things work in real life, and not in TV land or
Government land, this is the only answer.
--
atec77 wrote:
The reality is we all knew the model tweva aspires to was is and will
remain flawed due to data being made to fit the requirements
Now that climate-gate is openly being examined it's patently obvious
tweva is a fuckwitt , next time I get down Melbourne and time permits I
intend explaining in person exactly why he is
--
atec77 wrote:
just shows how little tweva matters , sydney then as I hear his silly
little shop is hidden in some backwater at the wrong side of town for me
so the visiting might be to much trouble , either way the bloke is still
a fuckwitt
--
kreed wrote:
Bloody hell, for an "expert" on spotting good and bad "science" you
are a real riot Trev.
On the other hand, based on what we see these days, it is possible
that DDT ill effects
were pushed aside for financial gain - kind of like what "warmists" do
now for financial gain, or to protect financial gain..
Much easier to do back then with no internet or other
public ways of mass info dissemination other than mainstream media.
--
Bernd Felsche wrote:
Mounting evidence? Steaming piles of manure.
Pure Gedankenexperiments and soothsaying akin to reading the
entrails of chickens.
--
Noddy wrote:
The one were most of the "credible" scientists in England who have been
associated with it for a number of years are now largely in hiding after
it was recently revealed that their modelling was wrong (and they knew
it) and that their principal objective was to scare the shit out of the
public to ensure continued funding.
--
kreed wrote:
The IPCC reports are not relevant. Its paid, corrupted, agenda based
"science". The IPCC has little credibility and it won't be accepted
in a rational discussion.
Kind of like asking a used car salesman or a politician (hmmm... bad
example as I know Trev worships labor pollies and big banks)
Kind of like asking Hitler for advice on advancing the rights of
Jewish people, and having blind faith and belief in all he says ?
--
kreed wrote:
Anyone who debunks this AGW garbage is not going to be allowed a voice
or funding for their
research as they cost the big guys trillions.
--
kreed wrote:
If the ABC bought and paid for news and current affairs programs say
there is man made global warming, because its being told by a bimbo
news announcer with no qualifications, that means I should ignore it
too ! Thanks for clarifying that Twever.
--
'Lindsay' wrote:
Ask him about his elastic seine net killfile. It's a Twev special. It
breathes like a human lung, and lets people in and out whenever he sees
fit,
but he forgets to tell anyone, until it suits his dodgy arguements.
At one stage he had every "John" on the net in there, and expected me to
pick one. I picked John the Baptist, John Lennon, John Cleese, which were
all wrong.
--
kreed wrote:
Now that that is over we shall see. The basics are is that it is a
tax, and therefore state theft of private property without consent,
and that governments are only good at turning things to shit means
inherently overall it has to have a BAD effect.
--
That'll do. I'm bored now. There is more. MUCH more. Not only are these
comments littered with gratuitous insults, NONE are backed with cites or
anything resembling facts. How do you expect me to respond when faced
with such purile nonsense?
When presented with credible cites and some facts, I will always be
happy to respond in kind. When I am presented with gratiutous and
childish insults, I will expose the insulter for what they are. Think of
my posts as a mirror. Don't like what you see? Then act responsibly.
--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au