OT GW

[Paul Saccani]

On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 08:10:41 +1000, Buzz^| <bradleyden@spammail.com>
wrote:

On 16/01/2012 2:28 PM, Paul Saccani wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 12:27:16 +1100, Trevor Wilson
trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote:

On 1/14/2012 11:05 AM, kreed wrote:
On Jan 14, 7:52 am, Jeßus<n...@all.invalid> wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 08:36:45 +1100, Trevor Wilson

tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote:
On 1/13/2012 11:44 PM, kreed wrote:
the ones who own government and to the REAL evil worldwide.

**No one "owns" government. Here in Australia, we have a Democratically
elected government. If we don't like what they do, we vote someone else
in. Simple.


What a load of rubbish, like almost everywhere the political system
consists 2 controlled parties, and one of them always gets power
either outright or with the support of smaller parties who cannot wait
to sell out.

**Wrong. Again.

It doesn't look like it, despite your weasel editing to remove "with
the support of smaller parties" and pretend that he didn't include
more than two parties.

How about:
Italy?
Proves his point.
The UK?
Proves his point.
France?
Proves his point.
Germany?
Proves his point.
Afghanistan?
Proves his point.
Iraq?
Proves his point.
China
Not democratic, irrelevant.
North Korea?
Not democratic, irrelevant.
South Korea?
Proves his point.


snip

Well you say you would like more than two parties.

I don't believe I did.

Why didn't you put here on your list. We have many, many political parties?

Shouldn't you look at what happens in places with so many parties?

More is better isn't it?

We have 2 PMs two deputy PMs two of everything really, see how well it
works. Everyone wants to be boss, even the prior (or is it current)
ruling party is being split into two to make more parties.

Divide and rule is the motto here.

The answers to the constitutional questions are going to be
interesting...
--
Cheers,
Paul Saccani
Perth, Western Australia.