OT: Bush Thugs Rough Up Grieving Mother of KIA

[Rolavine]

From: Fred Bloggs nospam@nospam.com
snip

Nah- what this is going to become is the most monstrous welfare fraud in
the history of America. Those Iraqis are not stupid- they will take that
money for the labor jobs to rebuild something, blow it up, and then go
back to work re-building it, then blow it up, ad-infinitum.

LOL, good one!

It is also
clear that the ultimate distorted focus has been rebuilding the
infrastructure required to pump that stolen oil- an obviously degenerate
priority over any humanitarian concern! The Bush administration is too
stupid to avoid legitimate condemnation even in this over-priced public
relations document. The hallmark of the Bush administration from the
start has been to falsify and withhold executive branch government data
across the board. But when it comes to blatant political propaganda,
they really open those channels, and as usual they are incredibly
deceitful, publishing this highly charged political paper under the
guise of an engineering administrative report. It is a total fraud.

I though so too, but only called it interesting!
Your a good and funny writer!

I don't agree about this war being about OIL, hell it would have to go to $500
a barrel to pay for this war. Iraq full oil production at current prices is
worth only 25 billion a year. So far that would be 10 full years of oil
production to pay for the war if we spent a beliveable 250 billion so far..

So, not even oil can explain this war as well as the theory of it being 'Bush's
Personal Jihad'. Of course, after listening to Bush Supporters, this theory
also explains why their war related arguments make no sense, they know it was
revenge, but they are in love with revenge.

"That's the man that tried to kill my Dad."

Rocky

 

[Guy Macon]

Rich Grise <null@example.net> says...

Guy Macon did deign to grace us with the following:

Don Pearce <donald@pearce.uk.com> says...

So if I declare an axiom that black is, in fact white - I can build a
theory that states that all black objects are actually white objects,
and as a useful corollary, all white objects are actually black.

That is how Kevin's logic works - he has built his theory on a pile of
self-referential sand.

You forgot to say that all white objects being actually black
is trivially obvious and that anyone who doesn't agree is a twat.
These additional arguments will, I am sure, convince the entire
world that all white objects are actually black. QED.

Yes, and the sky is green - it's just a conspiracy that convinces
everybody that it's blue, when it's really not.

If you think the sky is blue, you clearly lack the advanged degree
required to understand the arguments that is is green. Yes, I know
I said that the arguments are trivially obvious before, but now the
arguments are to suptle for you - quit rolling your eyes like that!

OBSERVATION:
The sea is green.

AXIOM:
The sea is green because it reflects the sky.

CONCLUSION:
The sky is green because it reflects the sea.

QED


(Kevin Aylward, please plonk me, you craven dewberry pisshead cockup
pratting naff)

 

[Guy Macon]

martin griffith <martingriffith@yahoo.co.uk> says...

On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 15:28:16 +0100, in sci.electronics.design you
wrote:

Please adjust your software. "You wrote" works fine in emails,
but in newsgroups we have no idea who you are quoting.

I read in sci.electronics.design that John Fields <jfields@austininstrum
ents.com> wrote (in <thk5l05co4fvne7p2tpg89ocl46r2sjaf4@4ax.com&gt about
'Custom Meter Dials', on Thu, 23 Sep 2004:

Putting in the newsgroup and the name and the email address and the
message-ID and the subject and the date is a bit of overkill, IMO.

I must say that I find it confusing, and the Help was written by people
who knew far too much about it, like much other software help.

I found the same with Linux documentation, which is a shame. I almost
wanted to start www.Joined_Up_Linux.org ( dont clik, it doesnt exist)

Have either of you considered picking some small part of Linux that
you have figured out and writing up some documantation for it?
Linux needs more ordinary users explaining things in plain language.

 

[Dirk Bruere at Neopax]

John Woodgate wrote:

I read in sci.electronics.design that Dirk Bruere at Neopax
dirk@neopax.com> wrote (in <2rg1pkF1a9s0cU2@uni-berlin.de&gt about
'[OT]: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper"', on Thu, 23 Sep
2004:

The *phenomenon* manifested itself in several *phenomena*.


In which case, it's a meta-phenomenon.

No.
The phenonenon was Philip who manifested via various phenomena.

--
Dirk

The Consensus:-
The political party for the new millenium
http://www.theconsensus.org

 

[Frithiof Andreas Jensen]

"Rich Grise" <null@example.net> wrote in message
news:0Pu4d.5654$Co1.1995@trnddc02...

It's about the silliest thing I've heard yet.

It's actually true!!!!

*However* Windows being the simple creature what it is, the first workaround
is of course to make a duplicate of the install disk and feed it that.

If is has thrashed the Original disk, I do seem to remember that all it
actually does it to overwite the boot sector with a program that nags about
it and then hangs up. Restoring the boot sector fixes it. I was hit by this
and I worked around it - so it is not so hard.

 

[Paul Burke]

Dirk Bruere at Neopax wrote:

I want to know how *not* to be God!

Easy. Resign.

 

[Guy Macon]

Rich Grise <null@example.net> says...

But for heaven's sakes, don't take anybody's word for anything - you
have to draw your own conclusions, like with anything else.

I thought that you had to have a degree to draw your own conclusions...

(Kevin Aylward, please killfile me. You are a dankish clack-dish
gormless plonker.)

 

[Rolavine]

From: Jim Yanik jyanik@abuse.gov

Perhaps that's due to the liberal bias most universities have these days.
They inculcate their students with it.
And all that political correctness,too.

Nope, it is due to the fact that Liberalism is based on making decisions with

facts and objectivity, and they teach facts and objectivity at them
institutions of higher learning.

Neoconism is based on subjectivity, ethnocentricity, generalities, and a set of
myths that could be disproven by any child with access to google in five
minutes. Also, since it takes more than four years of brainwashing to get
someone reduced enough to accept this kind of BS, it would have to in a
combined masters program.

Rocky

 

[Dirk Bruere at Neopax]

Paul Burke wrote:

Dirk Bruere at Neopax wrote:


I want to know how *not* to be God!


Easy. Resign.

How?

--
Dirk

The Consensus:-
The political party for the new millenium
http://www.theconsensus.org

 

[Dirk Bruere at Neopax]

Guy Macon wrote:

Kevin Aylward <salesEXTRACT@anasoft.co.uk> says...


PLONK!


Please plonk me as well. You see, Rich Grise and I are such
good buddies that we like to go everywhere together.

If you don't killfile me I will take that as evidence that
you find my posts to be valuable and well worth reading.

BTW, your royal family is ugly and your government is a lapdog
for George W. Bush.

Very true.

--
Dirk

The Consensus:-
The political party for the new millenium
http://www.theconsensus.org

 

[John Fields]

On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 15:07:13 +0000 (UTC), kensmith@green.rahul.net
(Ken Smith) wrote:

I spent a couple of hours trying to learn it but one of the other
engineers suggested a different program, Intellicad. In about 1/2 a hour
I finished the job I was trying to do with AutoSketch and have never gone
back to try to finish learning Autosketch. I don't see much point since
better software can be had for less.

---
If you've never used AutoSketch, then I find it difficult to
understand how you can say it's better or worse than something else.

Something else is easier to learn? Sure.

Something else is better? Not necessarily, since it depends on what
you need to do. However, for your application (which took only half
an hour to complete, including learning to use the CAD package!) the
simple package probably was better.

--
John Fields

 

[John Woodgate]

I read in sci.electronics.design that Guy Macon <http@?.guymacon.com>
wrote (in <10l5p6jfme0oa90@news.supernews.com&gt about '[OT]: Ping Kevin
Aylward - re your "scientific paper"', on Thu, 23 Sep 2004:

John Woodgate <jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk> says...

They aren't obligatory. I think you'd do better to just ignore the
critiques that are obviously based on a lack of understanding.

What part of "The vast majority of experts do *not* consider
free will to be proven not to exist. Most experts say that it
is an open question and depends on such hotly debated factors
as the many-worlds interpretation" is obviously based on a
lack of understanding?

What part of "The vast majority of experts do *not* believe
that Heisenberg was wrong and that you can have exact knowledge
of the position and velocity of a subatomic particle" is
obviously based on a lack of understanding?


Did I cite your texts? It's clearly a matter of opinion which texts are

'based on a lack of understanding', but it's STILL better to ignore
rather than react with abuse.

Unless, of course, you actually like being abused. (;-)
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
The good news is that nothing is compulsory.
The bad news is that everything is prohibited.
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk

 

[Jim Yanik]

kensmith@green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) wrote in
news:citdgq$h5$2@blue.rahul.net:

In article <118afaeb.0409221056.21f9c32b@posting.google.com>,
Product developer <jdurban@vorel.com> wrote:
rolavine@aol.com (Rolavine) wrote in message
news:<20040921232637.11452.00003662@mb-m23.aol.com>...
[...]
vote for Bush, it's hard to believe that anyone would love failure
that much.

These are only lies to the uniformed or rabid liberals which is really
one in the same.

Statistics show that the better educated and informed someone is the
more likely they are to be a democrat, so your observation is contrary
to the facts.

Perhaps that's due to the liberal bias most universities have these days.
They inculcate their students with it.
And all that political correctness,too.



--
Jim Yanik
jyanik-at-kua.net

 

[Jim Yanik]

"Watson A.Name - \"Watt Sun, the Dark Remover\"" <NOSPAM@dslextreme.com>
wrote in news:10l5er0m8fhsg64@corp.supernews.com:

"fancy nospam tunes" <tunesandballoons@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1270ed33.0409221027.333ca624@posting.google.com...
James D. Veale <jdveale@TheWorld.com> wrote in message
news:<chgltg$523$1@pcls4.std.com>...
You might want to check out

http://www.streamlight.com

http://www.flashlights.com

Streamlight makes a 2 AA Luxeon flashlight
and a dimmable 3 AAA Luxeon headlight. I believe the flashlight
has a DC-DC voltage converter, so it runs well on NiMH
rechargeables.

Check candlepower.com or ledmusuem.com reviews before buying the Argo
headlamp. One review alleged the 3 AA batteries lasted only an hour.
Would be very costly, if NiMH rechargeable batteries weren't used. The
new model Argo may have an improved (more efficient) driver.

What is the cost of building a LS 2-AA headlamp?

Well, the 1W LS with lens, AKA -NW98, is about $16 or maybe a bit less.
So I'd say that that's the most expensive part. You can also buy a kit
of a LS and a Micropuck for about $25 and put into yout own case. I
bought two of them from LED Supply and put them each in its own project
box.

Micropuck:
http://lib1.store.vip.sc5.yahoo.com/lib/ledsupply/LuxDrive-2009-MAR-04.p
df

sales:
http://shop.store.yahoo.com/ledsupply/02009a-ho.html

Just make sure you heatsink the LS to some copper or aluminum.

In my humble opinion, the candlepower guys are a bunch of elitists,
trying to make some bucks. They make these good looking flashlights,
but they all use CR123 lithium cells which cost up to $10 each or more,
and are hard to find. I think the only way to go is the two AA cells,
and use rechargeables if you use it a lot. Two AA cells are only fifty
cents on sale. See www.cheapbatteries.com.

I bought a dozen 123 cells for $15 + shipping.($20 total,$1.66 per cell)

You want to drive a 1 *WATT* LED with a couple of AA cells?
How much power do you think 2 AA cells can source?

--
Jim Yanik
jyanik-at-kua.net

 

[legg]

On 23 Sep 2004 04:59:37 -0700, "vijayamurugan.P" <netizen@outgun.com>
wrote:

sorry sir

the input is 3 Phase AC 415V 50Hz/60Hz
the output Requirment is 1800 Amps,75 Volts.
Suggest me suitable Converter confihuration & devices used in the
circuit

At this power level, the requirements of the load will play a
significant role in determining the conversion method. Of major
concern are weight, volume, and regulation/ripple expectations. Cost
and environmental factors may also limit your choices.

If this is a tech school project, then you should identify one
practical application and concentrate on satisfying this one
application, as part of the design process. This will allow you to
make practical decisions about, for example, whether DC is actually
preferable over AC, as niether is intrinsically stated in your spec,
so far.

Once identified, you may find that the 75V and 1800A are not actually
required simultaneously - that the system power level is lower than
the label requirements suggest at first glance.

If you google for "MEGAWATT SOLID-STATE ELECTRONICS", you'll find a
number of informative articles, that may help in determining your
approach to a full-powered system.

RL

 

[John Woodgate]

I read in sci.electronics.design that Rich Grise <null@example.net>
wrote (in <_sB4d.8178$2A1.2381@trnddc08&gt about '[OT]: Ping Kevin
Aylward - re your "scientific paper"', on Thu, 23 Sep 2004:

On Wednesday 22 September 2004 02:10 am, John Woodgate did deign to grace us
with the following:

I read in sci.electronics.design that Rich Grise <null@example.net
wrote (in <wY94d.7083$je.2025@trnddc04&gt about '[OT]: Ping Kevin Aylward
- re your "scientific paper"', on Wed, 22 Sep 2004:

Is that what got us into earthworms?

No, it's interment that gets you into earthworms. Especially if you go
to Ilkley Moor for romantic pursuits without your hat.
--
All I've found on Ilkley Moor is some pictures of some rolling hills.
Would you be so kind as to enlighten us, or at least me, on your reference
here?

I'm a bit surprised that your search didn't turn up the National Anthem

of Free and Independent Yorkshire.

This should do:

http://www.stockdill.freeserve.co.uk/moor/
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
The good news is that nothing is compulsory.
The bad news is that everything is prohibited.
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk

 

[John Woodgate]

I read in sci.electronics.design that Guy Macon <http@?.guymacon.com>
wrote (in <10l5nmonfuet21f@news.supernews.com&gt about 'Ping Kevin
Aylward - re GU...', on Thu, 23 Sep 2004:

This is just one more Kevin Aylward Ad Homenim attack. I am well aware
of the strengths and weaknesses of being an autodict,

I hope you didn't criticize Kevin' spelling.

To be clear, I make a point of NOT doing that, but in this case I'm
making a different point.
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
The good news is that nothing is compulsory.
The bad news is that everything is prohibited.
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk

 

[Ken Smith]

In article <MPG.1bbc4262193a3c5a98970c@news.individual.net>,
Chaos Master <renan.birckREPLYTONEWS.REPLYTONEWS.REPLYTONEWS@gmail.com> wrote:

Ken Smith writes within:
In article <4150F0C3.9E6C303D@Hovnanian.com>,

The really important question is: Why?

'cause its the wifes computer and she won't switch to Linux.

Install Windows 98 SE then.

IMHO, Win 98 SE is the best Windows version, that isn't based on NT code.

If I have to do this again and can arrange a legal copy Win98-2 will go on
the machine. I have a strict rule about honoring copyrights.

--
--
kensmith@rahul.net forging knowledge

 

[Ken Smith]

In article <0Pu4d.5654$Co1.1995@trnddc02>,
Rich Grise <null@example.net> wrote:

On Wednesday 22 September 2004 11:46 am, Ken Smith did deign to grace us
with the following:

In article <20040922135642.04433.00001196@mb-m05.aol.com>,
Rolavine <rolavine@aol.com> wrote:
[...]
Are you sure it would destroy the floppies, I dont' think so, I think it
just looks at them to check that you own them.

Windows95 demanded that the DOS floppy not be write protected and trashed
it so the DOS on it won't ever install again. I assume that ME would do
the same to the Win98 floppies and am not about to switch off the write
protect to find out.

Where exactly did you get this little tidbit?

It's about the silliest thing I've heard yet.

From installing Win95 upgrade. You may think its silly but it is what
really happened on the Win95 install.

--
--
kensmith@rahul.net forging knowledge

 

[John Woodgate]

I read in sci.electronics.design that Guy Macon <http@?.guymacon.com>
wrote (in <10l5rbrm72qj3f1@news.supernews.com&gt about 'Custom Meter
Dials', on Thu, 23 Sep 2004:

Putting in the newsgroup and the name and the email address and the
message-ID and the subject and the date is a bit of overkill, IMO.

I do that because it helps to trace threads back. For example, today,
Dirk accused me of trashing one of his articles **that I hadn't even
seen**. Difficult, that!

[snip]

Have either of you considered picking some small part of Linux that you
have figured out and writing up some documantation for it? Linux needs
more ordinary users explaining things in plain language.

I just don't have time to get into Linux.
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
The good news is that nothing is compulsory.
The bad news is that everything is prohibited.
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk