R
Rene Tschaggelar
Guest
Yannick wrote:
potential. Otherwise an electric conntection between the two, eg
they being mounted onto the same sheet of Alu or such, would let a
current flow.
The potential of a surface is relative to others and has no influence
on how the EMI is spread.
Isolating the laser body creates some optics precision problems plus
perhaps heat problems.
If the laser body is the positive laser terminal, the current source
is negative. Is there a problem ?
Rene
--
Ing.Buero R.Tschaggelar - http://www.ibrtses.com
& commercial newsgroups - http://www.talkto.net
It makes sense to use the potential of the laser body as shieldingwhat do you mean by mass? earth or gnd? i dont actualy have a gnd apart from
that provided by the scope earth clip, as the power suply is double
isolated, but the sheild is at what i consider 0v, i might however have gnd
at 3.5 v so the laser diode body is grounded, or have a seperate -3.5v suply
for the laser and a level shifter.
Yes 0V, why should u use the voltage of the laser body for shielding?
i was thinking this voltage of the shield has to be as low as possible
(relative to the used voltages) soo most EMI will not get past.
are doing the same , can you explain this?
potential. Otherwise an electric conntection between the two, eg
they being mounted onto the same sheet of Alu or such, would let a
current flow.
The potential of a surface is relative to others and has no influence
on how the EMI is spread.
Isolating the laser body creates some optics precision problems plus
perhaps heat problems.
If the laser body is the positive laser terminal, the current source
is negative. Is there a problem ?
Rene
--
Ing.Buero R.Tschaggelar - http://www.ibrtses.com
& commercial newsgroups - http://www.talkto.net