OT: Bush Thugs Rough Up Grieving Mother of KIA

[Rich Grise]

On Thursday 23 September 2004 03:46 am, John Woodgate did deign to grace us
with the following:

I read in sci.electronics.design that Rich Grise <null@example.net
wrote (in <aMu4d.5653$Co1.4168@trnddc02&gt about 'SUPER-DUPER OFF TOPIC -
GOD ANSWERS RICH GRISE'S EMAIL', on Thu, 23 Sep 2004:

I don't know if this is irony, or if there's some other "category" or
"genre" but, if one were to ask that "seriously," I'd be inclined to
say, "Oh, I don't think he plonks anybody." ;-)

Revelation xx 15. Of course, the underlying axioms may not be useful.
(;-)
--

Just did a real quick search - I'll stand here and defend my position,
by saying I'm not technically wrong (if I got the right verse): "throw
into the lake of fire" is not equal to "plonk." ;-)

Cheers!
Rich

 

[Bob Stephens]

On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 15:21:45 +0100, John Woodgate wrote:

I read in sci.electronics.design that Bob Stephens <stephensyomamadigita
l@earthlink.net> wrote (in <1qstdsae4nzak.88acqjjtcv1r$.dlg@40tude.net&gt
about 'Ping Kevin Aylward - re GUY MACON', on Thu, 23 Sep 2004:
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:50:58 +0100, John Woodgate wrote:

An understanding of Boolean algebra
requires one to dismiss the ideas of decimal math.

Or to more fully understand them.

(I know it's a split infinitive - bite me)

I don't follow all of Noah Webster's axioms - some of them are not
valuable. 'Or more fully to understand them.' is just not what anyone
but a pedant would say.


Incidentally, most of the 'rules of grammar' are axioms, of greatly
varying value.

I agree. I just figured I'd nitpick my own post and save everyone else the
trouble ;-)>

Bob

 

[Guy Macon]

Kevin Aylward <salesEXTRACT@anasoft.co.uk> says...

Guy Macon wrote:

Kevin Aylward <salesEXTRACT@anasoft.co.uk> says...

there are Replicators an Replicatants

Where do those replicators come from?

First the obligatory insults:
Ho humm. Look, sonny, we have already established you don't have the
pre-requite background to understand my answers, so go back to making
your girlie doll toys.

Over "100,000 girlie doll toys" with the most complex software ever
put into a toy, to be exact.

Have you *ever* made any actual electronic products that actual
consumers have bought?

This is sci.electronics.design, Let's see some actual designs,
blowhard.

Please killfile me, you smarmy lagerlout bloody woofter sod.
Bugger off, pillock.

 

[John Larkin]

On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:17:12 GMT, Fred Bloggs <nospam@nospam.com>
wrote:

Fred,

you are *way* too involved in this. It isn't healthy.

John


I want to see more polling statistics like the District of Columbia:
Kerry:86%, Bush:9%, Nader:5% - now those are reasonable numbers.

My favorite statistic for DC is their number of electors.

John

 

[Fred Bloggs]

John Larkin wrote:

On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:17:12 GMT, Fred Bloggs <nospam@nospam.com
wrote:


Fred,

you are *way* too involved in this. It isn't healthy.

John


I want to see more polling statistics like the District of Columbia:
Kerry:86%, Bush:9%, Nader:5% - now those are reasonable numbers.


My favorite statistic for DC is their number of electors.

John

Ahh- but their direct influence extends into West Virginia, Maryland,
Virginia, Delaware, and Pennsylvania ( not all border states I know).

 

[John Larkin]

On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 07:06:51 GMT, Spehro Pefhany
<speffSNIP@interlogDOTyou.knowwhat> wrote:

On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 19:44:34 -0700, the renowned John Larkin
jjlarkin@highlandSNIPtechTHISnologyPLEASE.com> wrote:

I'd never violate Ohm's Law, or resist arrest.

But I am disappointed that nobody riffed on my "monkey" post, though.

John

It was so close, but we were all put off a bit by the whole monkey-ape
dichotomy, I'm afraid.

Best regards,
Spehro Pefhany

Walking around with a chimp on your shoulder, I see.

John

 

[martin griffith]

On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 15:28:16 +0100, in sci.electronics.design you
wrote:

I read in sci.electronics.design that John Fields <jfields@austininstrum
ents.com> wrote (in <thk5l05co4fvne7p2tpg89ocl46r2sjaf4@4ax.com&gt about
'Custom Meter Dials', on Thu, 23 Sep 2004:

I must say that I find it confusing, and the Help was written by people
who knew far too much about it, like much other software help.

I found the same with Linux documentation, which is a shame. I almost
wanted to start www.Joined_Up_Linux.org ( dont clik, it doesnt exist)




martin

Serious error.
All shortcuts have disappeared.
Screen. Mind. Both are blank.

 

[John Larkin]

On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 11:14:03 +0200, "Josep Duran"
<j.duran@nospamteleline.es> wrote:

"Guy Macon" <http://www.guymacon.com> escribió en el mensaje

One cannot
have a better eBay feedback record than John Larkin's perfect one.


Take a closer look at his feedback and you'll see he doesn´t seem to care
about
leaving feedback to the others.

I would count this as a negative vote.

Luckily, ebay doesn't. And any seller has the right to reject my high
bids, and take less money from someone else.

John

 

[Rich Grise]

On Thursday 23 September 2004 02:45 am, xray did deign to grace us with the
following:

On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 08:30:06 +0100, John Woodgate
jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk> wrote:

I read in sci.electronics.design that Rich Grise <null@example.net
wrote (in <HZt4d.5647$Co1.4440@trnddc02&gt about '[OT]: Ping Kevin
Aylward - re your "scientific paper"', on Thu, 23 Sep 2004:
You Are One With
Nirvana.

No, he's One Without Nirvana.

Nirvana was never the same without one -- Cobain.

Wasn't he a singer? It seems Prince George and his Good ol' Boy cabal
are keeping America safe from such heinous terrorists as Cat Stevens.
I wonder if any of the shit^H^H^H^Hdittoheads see just how insane
their fearless leader really is, or if we have to ride it all the
way down first.

Thanks,
Rich

 

[Dirk Bruere at Neopax]

Rich Grise wrote:

On Monday 20 September 2004 08:36 pm, Don Taylor did deign to grace us with
the following:

I'd be up for the experiment, just to see if I'm right or wrong.


Do you mean as the patient? Would you like to try something a little
less intrusive, if a little silly-sounding at first?

When you get an "attack" of your noise, listen to it, as if it's
a radio station that's almost swamped in static (or whatever it
sounds like to you) and see if you can imagine it as some form
of communication, maybe hyperspace radio from aliens, or something;
listen with an attitude maybe something like, "Well, the guy's taking a
flight of fancy, but what's wrong with playing pretend just this once,
just so I can tell him he's wrong." And actually try to "actively
listen," as I said, like you're trying to pick a single conversation
out of a crowd, or whatever way you feel like "listening" to
your tinnitus.

Every now and then I get a mild ringing in my ears, as I suppose
almost everybody does from time to time, and I've tried that
listen-to-it trick, and it makes it go away.

Let me know what happens, OK?

"Slaughter your family now - Satan commands it!"

--
Dirk

The Consensus:-
The political party for the new millenium
http://www.theconsensus.org

 

[Fred Bartoli]

"John Woodgate" <jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk> a écrit dans le message de
news:CcdVhkJydsUBFw$P@jmwa.demon.co.uk...

I read in sci.electronics.design that Fred Bartoli <fred._canxxxel_this_
bartoli@RemoveThatAlso_free.fr_AndThisToo> wrote (in <4152b7d8$0$32712$6
26a14ce@news.free.fr&gt about 'High Current Low Voltage Power Source', on
Thu, 23 Sep 2004:

"vijayamurugan.P" <netizen@outgun.com> a écrit dans le message de
news:1095939576.745180.125450@k17g2000odb.googlegroups.com...
that is the output requirment
not input

suggest


1800A 75V output, no input.

Hmmm, let me think...
Yes... I'd go for an alternator feeding an AC motor that will drive the
alternator.


He says 'not input', not 'no input'.

Yes. I noticed that but I couldn't help it and expected nobody would jump on
me.
....but I forgot about you

But a rotating machine solution
seems to be a reasonable one for those numbers. Certainly much quicker
to develop!

Sure.


--
Thanks,
Fred.

 

[Guy Macon]

Rich Grise <null@example.net> says...

Kevin Aylward did deign to grace us with the following:

Rich Grise wrote:
On Wednesday 22 September 2004 11:24 am, Kevin Aylward did deign to
[snip}

PLONK!

Why does this not surprise me?

Can you tell me your secret? I have been *begging* the gob-kissing
gleeking flap-mouthed coxcomb dread-bolted fobbing beef-witted
clapper-clawed flirt-gill to killfile me.

 

[Rich Grise]

On Wednesday 22 September 2004 08:59 pm, Guy Macon <http://www.guymacon.com>
did deign to grace us with the following:

Rich Grise <null@example.net> says...

Actually, one time at an apartment in Bloomington, MN (near
Mpls.), at a patio party I happened to be wearing a fairly
bright red polo shirt. Some hummingbird zoomed up to just
outside arm's length, paused and looked me over, with a
"WTF??" look in his eye, and flew away. Most people (and I)
surmise that he probably thought I was a big azalea or
something. ;-)

Actually, most of here think that you are a big azalea (or possibly
a Titan Arum in full bloom) but are too polite to mention it to you.

HTH.

Believe it or not, I really don't mind - the flower is, after all,
the sexual organ of the plant (leer, snort.)

Cheers!
Rich

 

[Kevin Aylward]

Guy Macon wrote:

This is just one more Kevin Aylward Ad Homenim attack. I am well
aware of the strengths and weaknesses of being an autodict, and
have been quite careful to stay within my area of expertise.

Kevin wants it both ways; he alternates between whining that I
have not immersed myself in the details of his theory and
flaming me for supposedly immersing myself in the details of
his theory without being qualified to do so.

It doesn't require a degree to ascertain that the vast majority
of experts do *not* consider free will to be proven not to exist.

And this is a claim you made up. I certainly never said it. I pointed
you to some websites that indeed have many experts having the conclusion
that free will is an illusion.

Most experts say that it is an open question and depends on such

Stop making claims about what *most experts" say, you have no idea what
most experts say. Your boot in the loop.

Why dont you actually go and see the extensive reaserch peole are
actually doing on the brain. For example, complex ics have been designed
for insertion into the brain in an effort to correct memory problems.
All of this work is based on the principle that the brain is just a
complex physical machine. None, in my view, of these neural specialists
consider that any sort of soul is required. If the brain is indeed a
machine, subject to the laws of physics, here is no place for free will.
it that simple. The fact that many experts have failed to see this
inescapable logic is just unfortunate.

hotly debated factors as the many-worlds interpretation.

Oh dear...The MWI just dont get a look in, bar any but a few. Its not
relevent to the issue.

You have this comic book understanding of this whole subject and think
that it means something.

It doesn't require a degree to ascertain that the vast majority
of experts do *not* believe that heisenberg was wrong and that
you can ave exact knowledge of the position and velocity of a
subatomic particle.

Unfortunately time has moved on, and so has the understanding of QM. I
have gave you references to *modern* accounts of QM. Most, and I mean
most, physicists simply gloss over the fundamentals. It not that they
necessarily agree with the CI, they just don't have any requirements to
be concerned with them. Most experiments don't care, so neither do the
physicists. Indeed, in electronic engineering, most experts don't
understand stability theory exactly
(http://www.anasoft.co.uk/EE/feedbackstability/feedbackstability.html),
even those with PhDs. In most case it don't matter.

What part of the peer reviewed and published experiment I quoted that
actually made measurements better than a naive interpretation of HUP did
you not understand?

Oh, of course. None of it. You don't have the background.


Kevin Aylward
salesEXTRACT@anasoft.co.uk
http://www.anasoft.co.uk
SuperSpice, a very affordable Mixed-Mode
Windows Simulator with Schematic Capture,
Waveform Display, FFT's and Filter Design.

 

[Guy Macon]

Rich Grise <null@example.net> says...

I'd like to look this up, even if only as a talking point, but
what does "xx 15" mean?

Roman numarals. XX=20. (He should have used upper case)

 

[Rich Grise]

On Thursday 23 September 2004 12:03 am, John Woodgate did deign to grace us
with the following:

I read in sci.electronics.design that Rich Grise <null@example.net
wrote (in <OTt4d.5644$Co1.2225@trnddc02&gt about '[OT]: Ping Kevin
Aylward - re your "scientific paper"', on Thu, 23 Sep 2004:

Then, motivated by Consciousness - which the photon was in the first
place - the molecules start getting together, to form living things -
plants, that have one degree of freedom (and radial symmetry), animals,
that have two (and bilateral symmetry), and Humans have three.

You cannot be serious! Or is that a set of axioms? (;-)

I think it's more like a conjecture - kind of a "suppose this is the
case...", that he then seems to try to analyze - he makes no bones
about it being controversial or crazy or whatever - he just seems to
make a sort of "is there another way of looking at things?" kind of
exposition. A thought experiment, if you will.

As it happens, it works for me and I agree with every word. Of course,
I'm the guy he talks about at level 7 X 7. ;-)

And, of course, I'm about as prejudiced as a guy can get, when you're
talking about people who believe in their own delusions.

Cheers!
Rich

 

[Mark Fergerson]

Pooh Bear wrote:

xray wrote:

<snip>

I also used to say nuclear like George Bush (nuk-u-lar) until someone
pointed it out to me. (I guess nobody has told him.) I was consistant
and said "nuk-u-las" too. Not now.

Creases me up whenever Dubya says it.

Is it right that the world's most powerful leader hould be an object of
derision for his absence of language skills ? Never mind any other skills ;-)

That's a Washington D.C. thing. If you want the power brokers there
to take you seriously, you have to pronounce it that way, because the
old farts are incapable of admitting thay're wrong. Fucking stupid
politicians, anyway.

Then there is wash vs. "warsh". We can always learn if we are willing.

You lost me there - must be a US thing.

Generic Redneck dialect. I've heard that out of people from places as
disparate as Maine and SoCal.

Mark L. Fergerson

 

[Keith Williams]

In article <mto5l091f3fcr9s92fdf4b8pp4vdeb1sqk@4ax.com>,
jjlarkin@highlandSNIPtechTHISnologyPLEASE.com says...

On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:17:12 GMT, Fred Bloggs <nospam@nospam.com
wrote:


Fred,

you are *way* too involved in this. It isn't healthy.

John


I want to see more polling statistics like the District of Columbia:
Kerry:86%, Bush:9%, Nader:5% - now those are reasonable numbers.

My favorite statistic for DC is their number of electors.

....unfortunately the same number as twelve states (Delaware, Hawaii,
Idaho, Maine, Montana, North Dakota, Nebraska, New Hampshire, Rhode
Island, South Dakota, Vermont, and Wyoming).

--
Keith

 

[Guy Macon]

Rich Grise <null@example.net> says...

Just did a real quick search - I'll stand here and defend my position,
by saying I'm not technically wrong (if I got the right verse): "throw
into the lake of fire" is not equal to "plonk." ;-)

Plonking is in the book of Proverbs, Chapter 14, verses 15 through 17.

"A clueless newbie believes anything, but a prudent man
thinks before he posts. A wise man respects [insert deity
of your choice, if any] and plonks flamers, but a fool is
hotheaded and reckless. A quick-tempered man does clueless
things, and a smart-ass is hated."

(Translated directly from the original Hebrew)

 

[John Larkin]

On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 14:57:50 GMT, Fred Bloggs <nospam@nospam.com>
wrote:

John Larkin wrote:
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:17:12 GMT, Fred Bloggs <nospam@nospam.com
wrote:


Fred,

you are *way* too involved in this. It isn't healthy.

John


I want to see more polling statistics like the District of Columbia:
Kerry:86%, Bush:9%, Nader:5% - now those are reasonable numbers.


My favorite statistic for DC is their number of electors.

John


Ahh- but their direct influence extends into West Virginia, Maryland,
Virginia, Delaware, and Pennsylvania ( not all border states I know).

That influence is, I suspect, negative.

John