C
charles
Guest
In article <kftviuFc8gbU1@mid.individual.net>,
JNugent <jnugent@mail.com> wrote:
But the driving of vehicles is called \"motoring\" not \"engining\".
My (1960) Chambers Dictionary says \"a machine whereby some source of energy
is used to give motion .. esp an internal combustion engine or a machine
for converting electrical into mechanical energy\"
> There\'s no over-riding reason why this should be so. It just *is* so.
--
from KT24 in Surrey, England - sent from my RISC OS 4té
\"I\'d rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom\" Thomas Carlyle
JNugent <jnugent@mail.com> wrote:
On 26/06/2023 10:00 am, charles wrote:
Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:
John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:
devnull <devnull@alt.home.repair> wrote:
The Natural Philosopher wrote:
me wrote:
Commander Kinsey wrote:
Start stop is pointless, it saves fuck all petrol to turn the
engine off for a minute.
The money you might save on gas you\'ll spend replacing the starter
motor.
As usual kinsey is exactly wrong, as are you
The more you use the starter, the sooner it will wear out.
The only motor in a Tesla is an electric motor.
Idiot, all motors are electric.
Funny, I thought they were all \"motor cars\" whatever the engine type.
\"Motor\", referring specifically to an internal combustion engine, is an
Americanism. In British English, the word almost always references an
electric motor. Note that you never hear \"electric engine\".
But the driving of vehicles is called \"motoring\" not \"engining\".
My (1960) Chambers Dictionary says \"a machine whereby some source of energy
is used to give motion .. esp an internal combustion engine or a machine
for converting electrical into mechanical energy\"
> There\'s no over-riding reason why this should be so. It just *is* so.
--
from KT24 in Surrey, England - sent from my RISC OS 4té
\"I\'d rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom\" Thomas Carlyle