need a cheap student edition FPGA

On Sat, 08 May 2010 10:00:16 -0400, barbara@bookpro.com wrote:

On Fri, 07 May 2010 22:09:24 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:


"krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" wrote:

On Fri, 07 May 2010 20:48:05 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:


"krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" wrote:

On Fri, 07 May 2010 19:37:28 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:


"krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" wrote:

On Fri, 7 May 2010 15:39:52 -0400, "Otto Bahn" <Ladybrrane@GroinToHell.com
wrote:

"Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote

Like the top of your head?

Everybody likes the top of Barbara's head.


A real 'Chrome Dome'? :)

"Beer rest" is the correct answer.

I'm a trifle bemused by the reference to DD-214 in your .sig, though.

Surely people who own destroyers other than the old USS Tracy should be
allowed to stand (or, as you Americans say, run) for office?


I use that sig file for a reason. People who have served their
country in the military know that you don't drag your country to war for
some things, but when you do, you go in with enough manpower and weapons
to get the job done in a short time. Also, in the military you learn to
complete your mission within budget.

Please to be explaining Iraq.

More examples of the "875 Verbal SAT score", oTTo? What a lying sack of shit.


Do you think it's the same inflatable airhead 'Otto' that was in one
of the 'Airplane' movies?

Can't be. That Otto was funny.


Only because of the sight gags. The mule was funny too, but he can't
design electronics. :)

Maybe oTTo looks funny but I'm betting on pathetic.

Are you up for a thought experiment?

Just suppose--for the sake of argument--that oTTo knew exactly what
the SAT score ranges are and were. Suppose that he posted what he did
about his alleged score just to see what kind of responses he would
get. And suppose a couple of people pointed out why this score wasn't
possible, perhaps thinking that he was conflating verbal and math.
Then suppose that, in spite of claims, arguments, and Web links to the
contraray, oTTo continued to insist on his score, and these folks
continued to point out that his claim wasn't possible. Just suppose
they continued to try to force him admit his error long past the point
at which sensible people realized what was going on--indeed, past the
point when oTTo himself posted clues as big as stop signs.
Click to expand...
That would suppose that oTTo had a brain, something that is not possible.

If oTTo made himself look foolish intentionally and the people who
kept biting his shiny hook made themselves look foolish
unintentonally, which is the bigger fool?
Click to expand...
oTTo, obviously.
 
barbara@bookpro.com wrote:
On Fri, 07 May 2010 22:09:24 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:


"krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" wrote:

On Fri, 07 May 2010 20:48:05 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:


"krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" wrote:

On Fri, 07 May 2010 19:37:28 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:


"krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" wrote:

On Fri, 7 May 2010 15:39:52 -0400, "Otto Bahn" <Ladybrrane@GroinToHell.com
wrote:

"Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote

Like the top of your head?

Everybody likes the top of Barbara's head.


A real 'Chrome Dome'? :)

"Beer rest" is the correct answer.

I'm a trifle bemused by the reference to DD-214 in your .sig, though.

Surely people who own destroyers other than the old USS Tracy should be
allowed to stand (or, as you Americans say, run) for office?


I use that sig file for a reason. People who have served their
country in the military know that you don't drag your country to war for
some things, but when you do, you go in with enough manpower and weapons
to get the job done in a short time. Also, in the military you learn to
complete your mission within budget.

Please to be explaining Iraq.

More examples of the "875 Verbal SAT score", oTTo? What a lying sack of shit.


Do you think it's the same inflatable airhead 'Otto' that was in one
of the 'Airplane' movies?

Can't be. That Otto was funny.


Only because of the sight gags. The mule was funny too, but he can't
design electronics. :)

Maybe oTTo looks funny but I'm betting on pathetic.

Are you up for a thought experiment?

Just suppose--for the sake of argument--that oTTo knew exactly what
the SAT score ranges are and were. Suppose that he posted what he did
about his alleged score just to see what kind of responses he would
get. And suppose a couple of people pointed out why this score wasn't
possible, perhaps thinking that he was conflating verbal and math.
Then suppose that, in spite of claims, arguments, and Web links to the
contraray, oTTo continued to insist on his score, and these folks
continued to point out that his claim wasn't possible. Just suppose
they continued to try to force him admit his error long past the point
at which sensible people realized what was going on--indeed, past the
point when oTTo himself posted clues as big as stop signs.

If oTTo made himself look foolish intentionally and the people who
kept biting his shiny hook made themselves look foolish
unintentonally, which is the bigger fool?
Click to expand...

Have you ever heard of 'Troll baiting'?

--
Anyone wanting to run for any political office in the US should have to
have a DD214, and a honorable discharge.
 
On Sat, 08 May 2010 16:28:43 +1000, Peter Moylan
<gro.nalyomp@retep> wrote:

Hatunen wrote:
On Thu, 6 May 2010 10:13:45 -0400, "Otto Bahn"
Ladybrrane@GroinToHell.com> wrote:

"Mark Edwards" <Mark-Edwards@comcast.net> wrote

As originally designed, a score of 500 on a test section was the
average, while each 100 above or below represented a standard
deviation.
That's just plain silly. There's only three standard deviations above
average according to your logic...?

The CEEB imposed a reporting cutoff at plus/minus three SD. Once
beyond 3 SD the scores get more and more iffy as to validity
(what's the real meaning if one test taker scores +5 SD while
another scores +6 SD?).

That's a strange place to saturate the score. In my experience, three SD
above average is the borderline for "will almost certainly finish a
university degree in minimum time", and two SD above average is the
cutoff for "will be able to start university studies, but will probably
never graduate". In other words, you're right at the point where
interesting predictions can be made.
Click to expand...
About 99.8% of the population is contained between plus/minus
3sd. Thre's no way to say with certainty that a score at +4sd
actually is meaningful.



--
************* DAVE HATUNEN (hatunen@cox.net) *************
* Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow *
* My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *
 
barbara@bookpro.com filted:
If oTTo made himself look foolish intentionally and the people who
kept biting his shiny hook made themselves look foolish
unintentonally, which is the bigger fool?
Click to expand...
This is plenty big enough for me:

http://www.waitrose.com/assets/img/recipes/normal/0206ss04r06.jpg

.....r


--
"Oy! A cat made of lead cannot fly."
- Mark Brader declaims a basic scientific principle
 
No cluons were harmed when Hatunen wrote:
"Mark Edwards" <Mark-Edwards@comcast.net> wrote
Click to expand...
You forgot to remove me from the attributions after you snipped what I
posted...


Mark Edwards
--
Proof of Sanity Forged Upon Request
 
"Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote

On Fri, 07 May 2010 20:48:05 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:


"krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" wrote:

On Fri, 07 May 2010 19:37:28 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:


"krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" wrote:

On Fri, 7 May 2010 15:39:52 -0400, "Otto Bahn"
Ladybrrane@GroinToHell.com
wrote:

"Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote

Like the top of your head?

Everybody likes the top of Barbara's head.


A real 'Chrome Dome'? :)

"Beer rest" is the correct answer.

I'm a trifle bemused by the reference to DD-214 in your
.sig, though.

Surely people who own destroyers other than the old USS
Tracy should be
allowed to stand (or, as you Americans say, run) for office?


I use that sig file for a reason. People who have served
their
country in the military know that you don't drag your country
to war for
some things, but when you do, you go in with enough manpower
and weapons
to get the job done in a short time. Also, in the military
you learn to
complete your mission within budget.

Please to be explaining Iraq.

More examples of the "875 Verbal SAT score", oTTo? What a lying
sack of shit.


Do you think it's the same inflatable airhead 'Otto' that was
in one
of the 'Airplane' movies?

Can't be. That Otto was funny.


Only because of the sight gags. The mule was funny too, but he
can't
design electronics. :)

Maybe oTTo looks funny but I'm betting on pathetic.

Are you up for a thought experiment?

Just suppose--for the sake of argument--that oTTo knew exactly what
the SAT score ranges are and were. Suppose that he posted what he did
about his alleged score just to see what kind of responses he would
get. And suppose a couple of people pointed out why this score wasn't
possible, perhaps thinking that he was conflating verbal and math.
Then suppose that, in spite of claims, arguments, and Web links to the
contraray, oTTo continued to insist on his score, and these folks
continued to point out that his claim wasn't possible. Just suppose
they continued to try to force him admit his error long past the point
at which sensible people realized what was going on--indeed, past the
point when oTTo himself posted clues as big as stop signs.

If oTTo made himself look foolish intentionally and the people who
kept biting his shiny hook made themselves look foolish
unintentonally, which is the bigger fool?


Have you ever heard of 'Troll baiting'?
Click to expand...
Yeah, it's that lame excuse trollees use after they finally realize
the numerous, voluminous posts were just a big waste of time, as if
all that writing justified get a short little bit of bait from me.

--oTTo--
 
"Hatunen" <hatunen@cox.net> wrote

Please to be explaining Iraq.

And Afghanistan and Viet Nam.


Ask the British why they screwed up the area, and the UN about their
decisions about Iraq.

The French started the crap in IndoChina, then deserted. Wimpy assed
politicians refused to allow US troops to fight an effective war. That
old BS about crossing a line in the sand doesn't work. The only policy
that does work is 'Destroy your enemy totally and utterly, that he rise
against you not again.'

The subject at issue is the previous statement:
Click to expand...
Yeah, Bush II served in the military, so maybe his blanket statement
about people who served is a tad off. Why Bush I didn't finish the
job either is another story. Then there's JFK's botched attempts.

--oTTo--
 
<krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote

Like the top of your head?

Everybody likes the top of Barbara's head.


A real 'Chrome Dome'? :)

"Beer rest" is the correct answer.

I'm a trifle bemused by the reference to DD-214 in your .sig,
though.

Surely people who own destroyers other than the old USS Tracy
should
be
allowed to stand (or, as you Americans say, run) for office?


I use that sig file for a reason. People who have served their
country in the military know that you don't drag your country to war
for
some things, but when you do, you go in with enough manpower and
weapons
to get the job done in a short time. Also, in the military you
learn
to
complete your mission within budget.

Please to be explaining Iraq.

More examples of the "875 Verbal SAT score", oTTo?

Exactly. Many people do not realize that is perfectly good
grammer (and even preferred in some situations). Hell, I can
even detect the obvious!

It's nice that you admit to being a liar.

What an absurd assertion to make, right up there with a cretin
like you saying, "All cretins are liars."

Are you attempting to cop to the lesser charge of cretin? It's true, but
that
doesn't mean you're not also a liar, which you demonstrably are.
Click to expand...
The old "I know you are but what am I?" defense. Used by kids since
the time of Sophacles.

--oTTo--
 
On Sun, 9 May 2010 18:19:44 -0400, "Otto Bahn" <Ladybrrane@GroinToHell.com>
wrote:

krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote

Like the top of your head?

Everybody likes the top of Barbara's head.


A real 'Chrome Dome'? :)

"Beer rest" is the correct answer.

I'm a trifle bemused by the reference to DD-214 in your .sig,
though.

Surely people who own destroyers other than the old USS Tracy
should
be
allowed to stand (or, as you Americans say, run) for office?


I use that sig file for a reason. People who have served their
country in the military know that you don't drag your country to war
for
some things, but when you do, you go in with enough manpower and
weapons
to get the job done in a short time. Also, in the military you
learn
to
complete your mission within budget.

Please to be explaining Iraq.

More examples of the "875 Verbal SAT score", oTTo?

Exactly. Many people do not realize that is perfectly good
grammer (and even preferred in some situations). Hell, I can
even detect the obvious!

It's nice that you admit to being a liar.

What an absurd assertion to make, right up there with a cretin
like you saying, "All cretins are liars."

Are you attempting to cop to the lesser charge of cretin? It's true, but
that
doesn't mean you're not also a liar, which you demonstrably are.

The old "I know you are but what am I?" defense. Used by kids since
the time of Sophacles.
Click to expand...
I see you're too stupid to parse even simple logic. Rather surprising for
someone with an "875" (75 more than is possible, for those not following
along) Verbal score on the SAT.
 
On Sun, 9 May 2010 18:10:13 -0400, "Otto Bahn" <Ladybrrane@GroinToHell.com>
wrote:

"Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote

On Fri, 07 May 2010 20:48:05 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:


"krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" wrote:

On Fri, 07 May 2010 19:37:28 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:


"krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" wrote:

On Fri, 7 May 2010 15:39:52 -0400, "Otto Bahn"
Ladybrrane@GroinToHell.com
wrote:

"Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote

Like the top of your head?

Everybody likes the top of Barbara's head.


A real 'Chrome Dome'? :)

"Beer rest" is the correct answer.

I'm a trifle bemused by the reference to DD-214 in your
.sig, though.

Surely people who own destroyers other than the old USS
Tracy should be
allowed to stand (or, as you Americans say, run) for office?


I use that sig file for a reason. People who have served
their
country in the military know that you don't drag your country
to war for
some things, but when you do, you go in with enough manpower
and weapons
to get the job done in a short time. Also, in the military
you learn to
complete your mission within budget.

Please to be explaining Iraq.

More examples of the "875 Verbal SAT score", oTTo? What a lying
sack of shit.


Do you think it's the same inflatable airhead 'Otto' that was
in one
of the 'Airplane' movies?

Can't be. That Otto was funny.


Only because of the sight gags. The mule was funny too, but he
can't
design electronics. :)

Maybe oTTo looks funny but I'm betting on pathetic.

Are you up for a thought experiment?

Just suppose--for the sake of argument--that oTTo knew exactly what
the SAT score ranges are and were. Suppose that he posted what he did
about his alleged score just to see what kind of responses he would
get. And suppose a couple of people pointed out why this score wasn't
possible, perhaps thinking that he was conflating verbal and math.
Then suppose that, in spite of claims, arguments, and Web links to the
contraray, oTTo continued to insist on his score, and these folks
continued to point out that his claim wasn't possible. Just suppose
they continued to try to force him admit his error long past the point
at which sensible people realized what was going on--indeed, past the
point when oTTo himself posted clues as big as stop signs.

If oTTo made himself look foolish intentionally and the people who
kept biting his shiny hook made themselves look foolish
unintentonally, which is the bigger fool?


Have you ever heard of 'Troll baiting'?

Yeah, it's that lame excuse trollees use after they finally realize
the numerous, voluminous posts were just a big waste of time, as if
all that writing justified get a short little bit of bait from me.
Click to expand...
Speaking of pots...
 
krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz <krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
"Otto Bahn" <Ladybrrane@GroinToHell.com> wrote:
krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote
Are you attempting to cop to the lesser charge of cretin? It's true, but
that doesn't mean you're not also a liar, which you demonstrably are.

The old "I know you are but what am I?" defense. Used by kids since
the time of Sophacles.

I see you're too stupid to parse even simple logic. Rather surprising for
someone with an "875" (75 more than is possible, for those not following
along) Verbal score on the SAT.
Click to expand...
Are you sure you did the continuation into the complex plane correctly? The
path you take is CRUCIAL to ending up at the correct score.

(And if you keep not snipping followups at this rate, you'll get there by
buffer overflow anyway.)

Dave "reverse polish residuation" DeLaney
--
\/David DeLaney posting from dbd@vic.com "It's not the pot that grows the flower
It's not the clock that slows the hour The definition's plain for anyone to see
Love is all it takes to make a family" - R&P. VISUALIZE HAPPYNET VRbeable<BLINK>
http://www.vic.com/~dbd/ - net.legends FAQ & Magic / I WUV you in all CAPS! --K.
 
On Mon, 10 May 2010 00:21:32 -0400, dbd@gatekeeper.vic.com (David DeLaney)
wrote:

krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz <krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
"Otto Bahn" <Ladybrrane@GroinToHell.com> wrote:
krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote
Are you attempting to cop to the lesser charge of cretin? It's true, but
that doesn't mean you're not also a liar, which you demonstrably are.

The old "I know you are but what am I?" defense. Used by kids since
the time of Sophacles.

I see you're too stupid to parse even simple logic. Rather surprising for
someone with an "875" (75 more than is possible, for those not following
along) Verbal score on the SAT.

Are you sure you did the continuation into the complex plane correctly? The
path you take is CRUCIAL to ending up at the correct score.

(And if you keep not snipping followups at this rate, you'll get there by
buffer overflow anyway.)
Click to expand...
No, I hadn't tried numerology either. Occam tells me it's just a lying
braggart, though.
 
On 5/9/2010 11:17 PM, krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Sun, 9 May 2010 18:10:13 -0400, "Otto Bahn"<Ladybrrane@GroinToHell.com
wrote:


Have you ever heard of 'Troll baiting'?

Yeah, it's that lame excuse trollees use after they finally realize
the numerous, voluminous posts were just a big waste of time, as if
all that writing justified get a short little bit of bait from me.

Speaking of pots...
Click to expand...
Hey, oTTo! How do you plan on getting this one off your hook?

Matthew
 
On May 10, 7:24 am, Matthew L Martin <mlmar...@teranews.com> wrote:
On 5/9/2010 11:17 PM, k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:

On Sun, 9 May 2010 18:10:13 -0400, "Otto Bahn"<Ladybrr...@GroinToHell.com
wrote:

   Have you ever heard of 'Troll baiting'?

Yeah, it's that lame excuse trollees use after they finally realize
the numerous, voluminous posts were just a big waste of time, as if
all that writing justified get a short little bit of bait from me.

Speaking of pots...

Hey, oTTo! How do you plan on getting this one off your hook?

Matthew
Click to expand...
Thats easy. Reel it in out of it's environment, and it will
suffocate.

If I had a nickel...

---
Mark
blue river day, get the kayak
 
"Matthew L Martin" <mlmartin@teranews.com> wrote

Have you ever heard of 'Troll baiting'?

Yeah, it's that lame excuse trollees use after they finally realize
the numerous, voluminous posts were just a big waste of time, as if
all that writing justified get a short little bit of bait from me.

Speaking of pots...

Hey, oTTo! How do you plan on getting this one off your hook?
Click to expand...
875 volts ought to do it. I just need to ask Kenneth
what the frequency is.

--oTTo--
 
On Sun, 9 May 2010 18:17:23 -0400, "Otto Bahn"
<Ladybrrane@GroinToHell.com> wrote:

The subject at issue is the previous statement:
Click to expand...
[deleted by Otto so no one will know what he's talking about]

Yeah, Bush II served in the military, so maybe his blanket statement
about people who served is a tad off.
Click to expand...
There questions about just how much serving Bush did while in the
military...



--
************* DAVE HATUNEN (hatunen@cox.net) *************
* Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow *
* My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *
 
"Hatunen" <hatunen@cox.net> wrote

The subject at issue is the previous statement:

[deleted by Otto so no one will know what he's talking about]
Click to expand...
It was already deleted by someone else.

Yeah, Bush II served in the military, so maybe his blanket statement
about people who served is a tad off.

There questions about just how much serving Bush did while in the
military...
Click to expand...
Deletion of Bush I and JFK noted. General statement about those
who served has been trashed.

--oTTo--
 
On 2010-05-10, krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:

Speaking of pots...
Click to expand...
Aren't they usually called variable resistors these days?


--
"Gonzo, is that the contract from the devil?"
"No, Kermit, it's worse than that. This is the bill from special
effects."
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top