Guest
amdx <nojunk@knology.net> wrote in news:qlmidt$2ae$1@dont-email.me:
It should not be. At least not electrically. The mechanical
logistics of depressing it to the click over point and then releasing
it back up to at least the reset point is likely where the bottleneck
is. You'd be better off with a reed switch. Then you would not
experience a problem until you reached the mechanical resonance point
of the reeds. Your mechanism for the actuation needs to have low
unsprung weight too to attain the rates you want.
One would think that micro and cherry would have rep rate data.
I wanted to make a turns counter for my drill press.
I have it set for 330 RPMs or about 6 cycles per second.
It doesn't work. Unreliable counting.
My high point is (switch closure time) about 1/12 of the
rotation, I
wonder if I did a 50/50 duty cycle if it would be better.
Or, is expecting the switch to operate at 6Hz just to fast for a
standard microswitch?
Mikek
It should not be. At least not electrically. The mechanical
logistics of depressing it to the click over point and then releasing
it back up to at least the reset point is likely where the bottleneck
is. You'd be better off with a reed switch. Then you would not
experience a problem until you reached the mechanical resonance point
of the reeds. Your mechanism for the actuation needs to have low
unsprung weight too to attain the rates you want.
One would think that micro and cherry would have rep rate data.